Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Influence of Dietary Synbiotic on Agonistic Behavior, Stress, and Brain Monoamines via Modulation of the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis in Laying Hens
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Supplementation with Organic Acid and Oregano Oils in Drinking Water on Pekin Duck Growth and Welfare
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacitracin Supplementation as a Growth Promoter Down-Regulates Innate and Adaptive Cytokines in Broilers’ Intestines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Impact of Heat Stress on Broiler Chicken Production

by
Oluwabunmi O. Apalowo
,
Deji A. Ekunseitan
and
Yewande O. Fasina
*
Department of Animal Science, North Carolina Agriculture & Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Poultry 2024, 3(2), 107-128; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry3020010
Submission received: 2 February 2024 / Revised: 28 March 2024 / Accepted: 8 April 2024 / Published: 29 April 2024

Abstract

:
Poultry farmers need to consider making adaptations now to help reduce cost, risk, and concern in the future; the industry’s high and unstable input costs, which result in losses, need to incentivize manufacturers to concentrate on efficient management, welfare, and health improvements, thereby creating premium and value-added products. Heat stress, a significant concern, particularly affects broiler chicken, which is vital for global meat supply in the dynamic field of poultry farming. Despite advances in breeding and management, these pressures have a negative influence on avian development, well-being, and overall health, threatening the poultry industry’s long-term viability. This study investigates the physiological reactions and production consequences of various heat conditions in the chicken business. It thoroughly investigates the complicated implications of heat stress, which has a negative impact on broiler performance and causes economic losses. This article investigates various dietary techniques, such as antioxidants, probiotics, amino acid balance, and vitamin supplementation, with the goal of improving chicken thermotolerance as part of a comprehensive stress reduction strategy. This assessment emphasizes the industry’s continuous commitment to sustainable practices by highlighting the need for more research to enhance methodology, investigate creative tactics, and address regional variances in heat stress.

1. Introduction

In the scope of poultry farming, broiler chickens are primarily cultivated for their meat. The increasing demand for animal protein is directly related to the ever-increasing world population, making efficient poultry production more important [1]. The production cycle is relatively short, spanning 5 to 8 weeks, during which these birds undergo a remarkable transformation. Starting at a weight of 40–55 g as day-old chicks, they quickly gain weight and reach a remarkable 2.5 kg by the time they are ready to be sold. Broiler chickens are vulnerable to problems, such as heat stress (HS), due to their quick growth. Recent years have seen a drastic reduction in the time it takes for chickens to reach market weight, thanks to improvements in production methods made possible by breakthroughs in breeding techniques in response to the worldwide surge in demand for chicken meat. As a result of these innovations altering the preexisting relationships with the environment, the production of broiler chickens is greatly affected by environmental stresses, which have negative effects on their health, welfare, and performance [2,3]. The health of broiler chickens is greatly affected by environmental factors such as excessive humidity, air flow, and temperature. Among these stressors, the most serious one is heat stress caused by high temperatures, which is worsening due to ongoing global climate changes [4]. It has negative effects on feed consumption, feed efficiency, body mass index, meat quality, and mortality rates [4]. The proper development and general well-being of broiler chickens depend on controlling these environmental stresses.
To maintain the advancements made in poultry farming, it is crucial to make sure that broiler chicks can survive these shifting environmental circumstances. Handling the different challenges that broiler chickens encounter is essential for a prosperous poultry farm. Environmental, dietary, or even internal stresses can upset these birds’ delicate physiological equilibrium [5]. The chicken production sector is still heavily impacted by environmental stress, despite advancements in housing and management systems that aim to reduce it [6].
The significance of tackling stress concerns and examining various techniques to alleviate stress in broiler production is emphasized in this review. Poultry producers must effectively manage many challenges that threaten the industry’s productivity and the quality of goods such as meat and eggs. The poultry industry persists in its development despite encountering challenges, propelled by the imperative to accommodate global demand for chicken products and accommodate evolving circumstances.

2. Definition of Terms

An environmental stressor refers to a component or situation within the immediate surroundings that possesses the potential to trigger distress or detrimental effects in living organisms which influences the health, behavior, and well-being of animals within a particular ecosystem. Environmental stressors may include interactions with other organisms, oscillations in the availability of food, pollution, high temperatures, habitat destruction, and many others [7]. Stressors encompass various elements such as temperature, climatic change, oxidative stress, and immune response [8] with particular emphases on heat stress in this review. When the net amount of heat energy leaving the animal and entering the environment is less than what the animal produces, heat stress happens [9].
Heat Stress: Poultry are considerably affected in terms of performance, health, and overall welfare by heat stress (HS) [10]. The inability of the birds to keep up with high temperature results in production of more metabolic heat than they can release. A condition known as hyperthermia, in which the body’s temperature rises abnormally, triggers HS [11]. Multiple physiological disturbances, including immune system abnormalities, hormone irregularities, respiratory difficulties, and electrolyte imbalances are observed in poultry exposed to HS [11,12,13]. Growth performance drops and intestinal barrier integrity is disrupted as a result of these domino effects of disturbances [14].

3. Factors Contributing to Heat Stress

Examination of Specific Environmental Factors Contributing to Heat Stress

A.
Climatic factors:
Seasonal Variations: Seasonal variations in poultry production refer to the cyclical changes and fluctuations observed in the output of poultry over different seasons of the year. These variations can be influenced by factors like temperature, daylight duration, and breeding cycles. Seasons characterized by high temperatures present a series of obstacles for the poultry industry. In their study, ref. [11] elucidate on the many consequences that arise from these factors. They encompass diminished meat quality, poor feed efficiency, altered behavior, and increased death rates. As an illustration of the ubiquitous impact of seasonal heat stress, these elements collectively contribute to large economic losses for chicken producers. Heat stress further compounds the variety of difficulties that poultry breeders must overcome. Ref. [15] emphasize that broilers exhibit heightened water usage in an effort to adapt to the elevated temperatures. The increased burden on water supply systems results in the need for strategic water management. The genetic aspects of heat tolerance introduce an additional level of intricacy, necessitating meticulous breeding techniques and selection processes to improve overall resistance to heat stress [11]. The production of broilers is substantially impacted by seasonal heat stress, which has adverse effects on health, performance, and economic outcomes. When confronted with the complex dynamics of hot seasons, it is critical for farmers to implement comprehensive management strategies, smart genetic selection, and advanced ventilation systems in order to ensure the profitability and sustainability of broiler farming.
Temperature: Birds are homeothermic animals, possessing the capability to regulate their internal body temperature within a relatively constant range. This functional ability (temperature regulation) occurs effectively when the birds are kept within a thermoneutral zone, which ranges from 21 to 28 °C (around 70 to 82 °F) [9], allowing them to maintain a stable temperature for their internal organs. A fluctuation in the environmental temperature above upper limits of the thermoneutral zone leads to heat stress in animals [16] which affects the overall performance of the chicken and can result in mortality. However, due to their high level of production, fast-growing broilers with a substantial body weight are highly susceptible to heat stress in environments with high ambient temperatures, while in the absence of developed thermoregulatory organs, neonatal chicks are vulnerable to cold stress and cannot endure the severe conditions. The optimal temperatures at which the bird can function most effectively are determined by its age, body weight, housing system, feeding level, relative humidity, air velocity, and overall health [17]. In situations with a high ambient temperature, chickens have greater energy requirements than those grown in thermoneutral environments.
Humidity: Heat dissipation is an additional aspect of heat management that is subject to the influence of a number of variables, in addition to heat production. Significantly influenced by the relative humidity of the surrounding environment, evaporative heat dissipation is a critical mechanism. Elevated humidity reduces evaporative heat loss, which increases with temperature. Age and air temperature are variables that influence the effect of humidity on the thermal regulation response of broiler chickens [18]. Humidity significantly influences the performance of broiler chicks and turkeys that have been subjected to temperatures elevating to 28 °C and 30 °C, respectively [19]. Redistributing heat within the body at high temperatures, humidity influenced the thermoregulation of 1-week-old broiler chickens, resulting in a rise in peripheral temperature and a decrease in rectal temperature [18]. On 4-week-old broiler chicks, however, elevated humidity levels over 60 percent exhibited varying impacts at 35 °C and 30 °C, hindering heat transfer at 35 °C while promoting it at 30 °C [18]. It is extremely important to address the variable humidity needs of broiler chicken, particularly in hot and humid climates, despite the difficulty of humidity regulation in poultry homes. To optimize the thermal comfort and well-being of chickens under a variety of climatic situations, it is critical to comprehend and control these variables.
B.
Management factors:
Housing Management: Numerous factors contribute to the overall heat stress on the chickens, which is reflected in the internal temperature of a poultry house. The proper management of poultry housing is critical in reducing heat stress, a possible stressor impacting productivity. Previous research has underlined the importance of ensuring adequate temperature regulation and ventilation controls in environmentally controlled housing for preventing heat stress [20,21]. In non-environmentally controlled situations, such as open-sided buildings, issues such as insufficient stocking density and ventilation can worsen heat stress [22,23]. Addressing these issues is critical for maintaining a healthy environment for chickens and avoiding heat stress-related problems. The aforementioned elements comprise heat produced by the avian species, ambient circumstances, the roof, the process of fecal matter biodegradation, and the exposed or shaded ground surface [24]. In equal environmental conditions, dark-colored surfaces absorb a greater amount of heat from direct sun radiation than light-colored surfaces [25]. Moreover, stagnant feces within the broiler house have the potential to release heat and a range of detrimental gases, including NH3, CH4, and H2S, as they decompose [26]. Achieving effective heat stress management in poultry production necessitates meticulous examination of the diverse heat generation sources present in the broiler house, as well as the development of solutions to alleviate the detrimental impacts these sources have on the birds (cool cell pads, sprinklers, fans, and tunnel ventilation are solutions to reducing heat stress). As a result, for maximum poultry welfare and productivity, the significance of the housing system is highlighted as an implementation to mitigate heat stress.
Nutritional Management: Poor nutritional management appears to have a more damaging effect on growth performance, health, and productivity of the young birds [27]. Heat stress causes broilers to limit their feed intake due to metabolic effort. Heat stress alters nutrient use, which in turn reduces hunger, which in turn slows growth and reduces feed conversion efficiency [28]. Consequently, the industry is experiencing losses in productivity and profitability, which threatens the economic viability of broiler production. In addition, broilers experience oxidative stress due to heat stress, which means there is a higher need for antioxidants to protect them from free radical damage [29]. When birds do not have enough to eat, their immune systems can become weakened and they become more susceptible to diseases caused by oxidative stress and the antioxidant defense mechanisms in their bodies. One popular way to reduce the physiological impact of heat stress on broilers is to restrict their feed intake [30]. Despite its good intentions, this method of heat stress relief makes feeding much more difficult. Broilers’ capacity to satisfy their nutritional needs for ideal development and growth is further compromised when feed restriction reduces the availability of vital nutrients [31]. To sum up, broiler production faces a tangled web of problems caused by the interaction of heat stress and nutritional inadequacies. To tackle these problems in a balanced way, we need to find ways to feed broilers so they can survive heat stress, build their resilience, and make chicken farming a viable economic and environmental option.
Water: It is important to consider the availability, temperature, and quality of water when producing broilers, especially when thinking about the effects of heat stress. When broilers drink water that is polluted with harmful bacteria or other contaminants, it can affect their digestive systems and weaken their immune systems [32]. As a natural cooling mechanism, birds drink more water when they are hot, but any pollutants in that water might make their health problems worse and lower their productivity drastically. A rise in water temperature may also occur because of heat stress and strong ambient temperatures [33]. Hot water can cause birds to drink less water, which can make them even more dehydrated and adversely affected by heat stress [34]. Also, a major problem during heat stress is not having enough water [35]. Sufficient water is essential for broilers to regulate their temperature and keep their physiological functions running smoothly [35]. Lack of water intake because of heat stress can make it harder for nutrients to be absorbed, which in turn might affect growth and performance [36]. For broiler production, heat stress is already a major problem, but when water is of low quality, very hot, and not readily available, it becomes much worse. During the heat stress period, it is crucial to establish a reliable source of clean water, control the temperature of the water, and make sure there is plenty of water available to offset these harmful impacts. To ensure the survival and resilience of broilers in harsh environmental conditions, it is essential to use appropriate water management methodologies.
Welfare and Stocking Density: Heat stress affects the welfare of broiler chicken. Increase in the intensity of heat stress coupled with compromised stocking density due to overcrowding of broilers has serious consequences for the birds’ health and well-being [37]. Despite the best intentions, overcrowding broiler chickens slows their growth, decreases their feed intake and efficiency, and endangers their health and well-being [38]. When broiler chicks are overcrowded in their house, their growth rate, feed consumption, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) all suffer [39]. Not only does overcrowding have a negative impact on broiler farmers’ bottom lines and overall income [37], but it also puts the birds’ health at risk. Research shows that broilers are more likely to experience effects of heat stress due to overcrowding, including decreased digestion and absorption, mucosal injury, and compromised intestinal processes [40]. Intestinal mucosal injury in broilers is closely linked to the increased release of corticosterone, which is caused by stress connected to high stocking density. This stress includes factors like competition for feed and water, elevated ambient temperature, and increased litter moisture content and ammonia levels [41]. One of the most important parts of rearing broilers at a high stocking density is the effect it has on carcass yield and meat quality [42]. Highlighting the need to resolve welfare concerns in chicken production methods, the convergence of heat stress and high stocking density intensifies these issues.

4. Economic Impact and Industry Resilience: Farmer, Industry, Country and Food Safety

The inadequate conversion of chicken feed into meat results in declines in productivity, ultimately causing considerable financial losses. For chicken producers in the United States, an annual cost reduction of about USD 50 million is anticipated for each one percent increase in feed conversion [12]. These obstacles are further compounded by heat stress, which in the chicken business alone results in annual economic losses of USD 128 to 165 million [43]. The ramifications of this phenomenon extend to the poultry business in the United States, where an estimated annual economic loss of USD 2.36 billion is incurred [11]. Chickens are susceptible to increased morbidity and mortality as a consequence of elevated ambient temperatures. Such practices endanger the well-being of chickens and have ramifications for human nutrition as well as poultry economic sustainability as a whole [9,44]. The financial repercussions highlight the critical nature of mitigating heat stress and improving feed conversion efficiency in order to ensure the long-term viability and profitability of poultry. Food safety is a top priority in today’s food quality paradigm, and the global chicken sector is facing a significant problem in this regard—high heat stress [45]. The complicated relationship between stress and its potential negative impacts on food safety is becoming clearer. While multiple findings demonstrate a relationship between stress and disease carriage in farm animals, the particular mechanisms underlying this association remain unknown [11,46].
Transportation of broilers from farms to processing plants under high-temperature circumstances exacerbates the issue, leading to measurable decreases in meat quality [47]. The combination of stress and transportation underscores the varied character of the poultry industry’s issues, which extend beyond on-farm factors. Foodborne bacteria such as Salmonella and Campylobacter colonize birds, posing a significant danger to both human health and the poultry and egg-producing industries. The spread of these diseases across the human food chain emphasizes the importance of resolving food safety issues in chicken husbandry. In the dynamic field of food quality concepts, food safety is a critical component. Recognizing the complex relationship between stress, transportation, and pathogen colonization is critical for developing comprehensive measures that protect both poultry health and the food supply chain’s integrity [48]. As the industry faces these problems, a comprehensive approach that includes stress management, efficient transportation methods, and stringent disease control techniques is critical to ensuring the safety and quality of chicken products that reach consumers.

5. Impacts of Heat Stress in Broiler Production

5.1. Gut Health and Immune Function

  • Gut Health: The digestive tract of poultry contains a complex and diversified microbiota that interacts with the host in a bidirectional manner. Using the diet as a substrate and given the intimate interaction between the microbiota and the host, it is likely that a variety of host and environmental conditions, particularly heat stress, will have a major impact on the intestinal microbial community [49]. While it is becoming increasingly clear that heat stress has an impact on the structure and function of the gut microbiota, the precise mechanisms underlying these effects are still being studied and are not entirely known [50]. However, the intestinal tract is extremely sensitive to heat stress and all other forms of stress [51]. The efficient functioning of the intestinal tract is essential for the production of poultry since it greatly affects the birds’ general well-being and productivity [52]. However, poultry farming places a premium on maintaining an intact intestinal barrier. The integrity of the intestinal barrier is compromised by heat stress leading to an increase in intestinal permeability. This is the process by which typically restricted molecules with large molecular weights (>150 Da) can diffuse immediately from the intestinal lumen to the bloodstream [53]. Heat stress causes morphological alterations and mucosal damage in the intestines of chickens because it reduces blood flow, nutrient and oxygen availability, and feed intake [54]. Ref. [55] reported that an increase in permeability and localized inflammation along the small intestine, which includes the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, are significant consequences of heat stress on the intestinal barrier [56].
  • Immune Response: Numerous studies have explored the impact of stress on the immune response in animals, revealing intricate interactions between the central nervous system (CNS), endocrine system, and immune system [57,58]. The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic–adrenal medullar (SAM) axes are the primary pathways through which the immune response can be influenced [59]. The presence of receptors for numerous neuroendocrine products of the HPA and SAM axes, such as cortisol and catecholamines, has been demonstrated to be present in lymphocytes, monocytes or macrophages, and granulocytes. These receptors have the ability to interfere with cellular processes, activity in the areas of trafficking, proliferation, release of cytokines, generation of antibodies, and cytolytic behavior [57,59,60]. Knowing how heat stress impacts the immune response in chickens has been the subject of recent research. Multiple studies have shown that heat stress weakens the immune systems of both broilers and laying hens. While different indicators have been used to identify this effect, such as lower thymus and spleen relative weights in laying hens, it has also been reported that broilers exposed to heat stress have lower lymphoid organ weights. Laying hens’ liver weights are known to drop when they are subjected to prolonged heat stress. Broilers subjected to heat stress during either the main or secondary humoral reactions showed lower levels of total circulating antibodies and specific IgM and IgY concentrations [61,62,63]. Moreover, research has shown that heat-stressed laying hens have decreased humoral immune responses systemically and fewer intraepithelial lymphocytes and IgA-secreting cells in their digestive tracts [64,65]. Broilers that were heat stressed showed less antibody responses and were less able to phagocytize macrophages. Alterations in circulating cell levels were also brought about by heat stress, with an increase in the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a result of decreased lymphocytes and raised heterophils [66]. When birds experience severe heat stress, their bodies produce more reactive oxygen species (ROS), which causes oxidative stress. When there are too many reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the environment, it can harm hens and cause oxidative stress. This disorder develops when the bird’s ability to deal with reactive oxygen species (ROS) is overwhelmed. Chickens experience oxidative stress when there is an overabundance of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction causes this illness by taxing the bird’s immune system to its breaking point. The immune system responds to these stresses by producing heat shock proteins (HSP). Members of this family include proteins like HSP70. These proteins aid in the correct folding of other proteins, stop misfolded proteins from clumping together, and speed up the breakdown of damaged proteins; they are essential for cell protection. Their primary function is to allow cells to deal with and recover from stress. When heat stress is applied to broilers and laying hens, research has revealed that their HSP70 concentrations rise. This suggests that their cells are responding by reducing the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [67]. The findings presented here highlight the multidimensional nature of heat stress’s effect on chicken immunity.
  • Production Performance and Growth: A number of physiological reactions in chickens result from heat stress, all of which have a substantial effect on poultry output. As a consequence, avian neuroendocrine profiles are altered as the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is stimulated and feed intake is diminished. Although individual birds may exhibit differences in the duration and severity of these reactions to heat stress, the overall pattern remains consistent. The extent of these responses can be influenced by the severity and duration of the heat stress. Ref. [11] underscore the overall similarity of avian responses to heat stress, hence stressing the extensive ramifications of increased temperatures on the health and productivity of poultry. Several researchers in the poultry industry have investigated the influence of high temperatures on the health, physiology, and efficiency of chickens [68,69]. Ref. [70] discovered that broilers aged 42 days exposed to chronic heat had a 16.4 percent drop in feed intake, a 32.6 percent loss in body weight, and a 25.6 percent increase in the feed consumption ratio. Studies by [71] have shown that chronic heat stress in broilers can negatively impact fat metabolism, muscle growth, and meat quality due to electrolyte imbalance and activation of lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, ref. [72] observed that heat stress was associated with a decrease in protein content and an increase in fat deposits in birds. Increased mortality and welfare concerns have been associated with elevated ambient temperatures while transporting hens. There is frequently a correlation between increasing chicken weight and heightened death rates; specifically, heavier chickens are associated with more mortality. To address and reduce potential welfare difficulties and mortality risks, this highlights the significance of including environmental variables, particularly temperature, and the weight of broilers into transit protocols. Subsequent investigations and initiatives aimed at refining transportation conditions in light of these variables could potentially aid in the enhancement of poultry welfare enroute. The impact of heat stress on different commercial broiler strains is shown in Table 1.
Health Challenges and Disease Susceptibility: Public health and economic implications in chicken production are substantial due to the colonization of birds by foodborne bacteria such as Salmonella and Campylobacter, which subsequently spreads along the human food chain. Foodborne illnesses [48,83] are frequently associated with consumption. Heat stress may have adverse effects on food safety via a variety of different mechanisms, according to an expanding body of literature. While evidence exists to correlate stress with pathogen carriage and shedding in farm animals, the precise mechanisms by which these processes occur are still unknown [84]. The occurrence of horizontal transmission, pathogen colonization, and increased fecal shedding are all associated with heat stress, which consequently increases the likelihood of contamination in poultry products [85]. In the past, the aforementioned characteristics of poultry infections were predominantly ascribed to the immunosuppressive effects of stress-associated hormones and mediators. In contrast, “microbial endocrinology”, a new perspective that has evolved in recent years, proposes that stress-associated hormones and mediators have a direct impact on bacterial pathogens [86]. Salmonella and Campylobacter, among others, are able to boost their proliferation and pathogenicity by exploiting neuroendocrine abnormalities that emerge from the stress response of the host, according to recent research [86]. This revelation emphasizes the complex interaction among stress, the neuroendocrine system of the host, and the behavior of foodborne bacteria, thereby illuminating possible strategies to enhance chicken food safety. It is essential to recognize that heat stress has the ability to affect the interactions between hosts and pathogens. Particularly susceptible to stresses, the gastrointestinal tract undergoes numerous changes, including modifications in the protective microbiota and a reduction in the integrity of the intestinal epithelium [87]. An ex vivo investigation revealed that tissues derived from heat-stressed birds exhibited enhanced mucosal attachment of Salmonella Enteritidis. This finding suggests that elevated environmental temperatures might have an impact on the bacterial concentrations in bird feces, as well as influence the duration and magnitude of contamination in the vicinity [46]. Notwithstanding these results, a number of epidemiological investigations have documented seasonal variations in the prevalence of Salmonella and Campylobacter in broilers, as well as in chicken products sold at retail outlets [88]. This underscores the significance of taking environmental factors, such as heat stress, into account when examining pathogen dynamics in poultry production. It further underscores the necessity for ongoing research to comprehensively comprehend the intricate relationship among pathogen behavior, host reactions, and heat stress [89].
Meat Quality and Carcass Characteristics: Modern broiler strains which have undergone rigorous breeding and genetic modifications are more susceptible to heat stress and oxidative damages than their ancestors [90]. HS drives up production costs and management, with an attentive decrease in the quality of the meat due to their susceptibility to heat as a result of quick metabolism and rapid growth therefore making their meat prone to oxidative reactions due to the presence of unsaturated muscle lipids [91]. Modern rapid-growing broiler strains are more vulnerable to heat stress and oxidative damage than their ancestors. Stress-induced effect on meat quality is occasioned by several contributing secondary factors and conditions such as lower pH, denatured muscle protein and increased drip loss, color (L*) value and shear force [92]. Muscle pH is the most broadly accepted chemical indicator that influences meat quality, and it fluctuates due to accelerating anaerobic glycolysis in muscle during and/or after slaughtering which results in decrease in muscle pH [92]. A sharp drop in pH results in changes in quality attributes of meat and is associated with low color (a* = redness), high drip (loss of proteins) and cooking losses in chicken breast meat [93]. The discoloration in meat occurs as a direct effect of myoglobin oxidation which results in lower redness [94] as increased lipid oxidation elevates the production of malondialdehyde aided by the presence of unsaturated muscle lipids in broiler meat. Acute heat stress significantly increases the amounts of malondialdehyde and carbonyls in muscle. Rapid postmortem glycolysis leads to accumulation of H + in muscle from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis. In heat-stressed chickens, the rate of anaerobic glycolysis to generate energy (ATP) by breaking down muscle glycogen is faster than in normal birds [95].
Responses induced by heat stress affect both ante- and post-mortem muscle metabolism, which result in a decreased pH, increased rate and extent of glycogen breakdown, and drip loss [96]. The accumulation of these events depresses the quality and shelf-life attributes of meat and its products. The creation of acute and chronic stress responses, a decrease in muscle glycogen and protein concentration, and a redistribution of fat storage are some of the major physiological and metabolic reactions linked to heat stress in poultry and their impact on meat quality. HS-induced oxidative stress results in a rise in reactive oxygen molecules and a fall in blood vitamin and mineral concentrations that support the immune system of an animal [97]. The continuous buildup of oxidation in the system harms cell membrane and mitochondrial integrity and causes cell damage through lipid peroxidation [98,99]. Oxidation of lipids leads to discoloration, drip losses, off-odor and off-flavor development in meat [100]. These effects of pre-slaughter stress are mainly attributed to alterations in the activities of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and muscle glycogen reserves. Heat exposure can directly affect the metabolism of muscles and organs [101]. For example, when there is heat stress, there is a quick reduction in muscle pH resulting in a limited water-holding capacity which might exacerbate the risks of pale-soft exudative meat in broilers and turkeys [102]. Acute or brief heat stress in broilers from before to slaughter resulted in pale, mushy, and exudative meat alterations in meat quality [102]. It is well known that oxidative stress stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), induces lipid peroxidation, and causes protein and DNA damage [103]. Additionally, heat stress increases the accumulation of lactate and lowers the pH; as pH declines, ROS production is accelerated resulting in protein oxidation. ROS can lead to diverse functions, including inhibition of enzyme activities, aging, loss of protein functions, and development of PSE conditions [104]. Elevated body temperature enhances the generation of ROS via accelerated rapid metabolic reactions in cells and tissues. Mitochondria is recognized to play a critical role in maintaining bio-energetic status under physiological conditions but becomes dysfunctional under acute heat stress leading to increased production of mitochondrial ROS in the skeletal muscle of chickens [105,106]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by high ambient temperature leads to oxidative stress. ROS cause lipid peroxidation in muscles, protein and liver damage, thereby triggering a serious impact on the growth of skeletal muscle [107]. Increased fat deposition and decreased muscle protein content are the results of high temperature differential disrupting lipolysis by suppressing enzymatic activities involved in lipid breakdown [108]. Reduced aerobic metabolism of fat and glucose and increased glycolysis as a result of ROS production compromising mitochondrial activity ultimately lead to low-quality meat with high drip loss and low pH [104]. Because it lowers the meat’s acceptability, juiciness, and palatability, drip loss is associated with overall meat quality. It is one of the main problems with meat quality that animal scientists are working to fix, especially with chicken and pork [109]. Prior to bird slaughter, heat stress causes a rise in rigor mortis and metabolic rate, which denaturates proteins. Since protein plays a role in meat’s ability to bind water, protein damage from a hot carcass inhibits protein’s ability to do so, leading to a noticeable drop in meat content and insufficient water-holding capacity, as evidenced by increased cooking and drip losses [110].

5.2. Physiological Responses to Heat Stress

Physiological and Behavioral Responses: In order for animals to attain optimal production performance over long periods of time and in different environments, it is essential that they maintain a consistent body temperature. Intense thermoregulatory reactions are required for dispersing excess heat when ambient temperatures are high in the summer. Physiological changes include elevated heart rate, respiration rate, perspiration rate, and rectal temperature, and behavioral changes include stretching, sunning, drinking more, eating less, and panting [111]. Without endangering their well-being, these activities enable birds to triumph over the tremendous changes. The balance between heat loss and gain mechanisms is reflected in rectal temperature, which is a crucial physiological indicator for assessing thermal stress. Air sacs aid panting by increasing gas exchanges with air, which boosts evaporative heat loss through surface air circulation [112,113], thus panting is a good time to use them. Chickens are no different from any other animal in that they show changes in core temperature in reaction to outside stresses. In terms of core temperature, 41.2 degrees Celsius is the minimum acceptable for broilers and 42.2 degrees Celsius is the maximum. When birds are subjected to heat stress outside of their thermoneutral zone, though, these limitations become more pronounced. Under heat stress, broilers have a greater rectal temperature [114], which leads to an unintended rise in cloacal temperature [115]. A number of variables, including the birds’ sex, age, strain, and weight, affect the rate at which their core body temperatures rise in response to heat stress [116]. The birds’ level of heat stress can be determined by tracking their variations in core body temperature. Moderate heat stress is defined as a shift of 0.4–1 °C in core body temperature or severe heat stress as a change of >1 °C [117]. High temperatures affect poultry by activating the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and increasing corticosterone levels [118,119,120]. Triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4), which are thyroid hormones, are vital to the physiology of chicken by controlling development and metabolic processes. T3 is the type that exerts direct biological activity on cellular metabolism, whereas T4 functions as a precursor that is transformed into T3 across different tissues. Hormones in chickens are of significant importance in processes such as feather formation, reproductive health, and body temperature regulation [121]. Their distinct physiological functions are influenced by their separate impacts, as illustrated by T3’s function in cellular metabolism. The coordinated regulation of metabolic and developmental processes, which are essential for the optimal growth and overall health of chickens, is achieved through the combined activities of T3 and T4 [122]. The balance of thyroid hormones, triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4), crucial for regulating body temperature and metabolism, is disrupted under heat stress. Studies consistently show decreased T3 levels in high temperatures, indicating thyroid dysfunction [119,123,124]. Effects on T4 levels vary across studies, with some reporting decrease, increase, or no change [11,125]. Disruptions in thyroid hormones, especially T3, impact the reproductive performance of chicken [126]. Chronic heat stress in broilers leads to endocrine changes, promoting lipid accumulation through increased de novo lipogenesis, reduced lipolysis, and enhanced amino acid catabolism [127].
Oxidative responses: In the poultry gut, oxidative stress is caused by pathogenic reasons, environmental variables such as heat stress, and dietary factors. Oxidative stress in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of chickens can be attributed to a multitude of variables, encompassing disease elements, dietary components, and environmental situations like heat stress. These pressures negatively affect the growth and production of broilers, in addition to the quality of the meat and eggs that are produced. Studies on heat-stressed broilers have revealed degenerative and oxidative changes in hepatic tissue, downregulation of antioxidant enzymes, and upregulation of HSPs and HSFs [127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139]. Chronic heat stress impacts the gene expression levels of key regulators such as Nrf2, NF-κB, HSP70, HSP90, and HSF3, leading to liver oxidative damage and an inflammatory response. Mycotoxins in poultry diets, such as aflatoxin B1, represent another stress factor causing hepatic oxidative damage, impaired mitochondrial function, increased ROS generation, and downregulation of Nrf2, SOD, CAT, and GPx [130]. The ramifications of heat stress on broilers are diverse, including modifications in feed consumption, impaired growth capabilities, immunosuppression, hypoxia, and heightened mortality [1]. Additionally, heat stress has a detrimental impact on the quality of chicken meat [8]. The adverse effects on intestinal morphology are evident in the reduced crypt depth, mucous area, and villus height observed in broilers subjected to cyclic heat stress. The modifications observed in the GIT underscore the complex correlation between environmental stressors, specifically heat stress, and the physiological welfare of poultry. This underscores the importance of implementing comprehensive management approaches to alleviate oxidative stress and its consequential effects on poultry production. These findings underscore the intricate interplay between environmental stressors, oxidative stress, and the regulatory pathways involved in cellular responses in poultry. The delicate balance between these factors determines the overall health, welfare, and performance of poultry in the challenging conditions of modern farming practices.

6. Mitigating Techniques and Strategies

Genetic and Breeding Approaches: Genetic selection is a promising tool in developing heat-resistant breeds. Interestingly, ref. [131] demonstrated that fine mapping with quantitative trait loci (QTL) can enable efficient screening of heat tolerance in birds. These results suggest that it is possible to use these genes to develop chickens that can withstand thermal challenges. The genetics of the commercial broiler business have primarily focused on achieving rapid weight gain and feed efficiency in the last 2–3 decades. Some of the genetic strategies include the following:
Marker-assisted selective breeding: Molecular markers have recently been developed to identify potential candidate genes associated with heat-tolerant characteristics for chicken bird selection to promote resistance to heat stress [132]. By boosting chickens’ ability to survive in hot conditions, genetic potential can help the poultry industry improve overall poultry performance [133]. To establish thermotolerant breeds by marker-assisted selection, it may be necessary to identify and incorporate the appropriate biomarkers in breeding programs for thermal stress reactions in chickens [134]. For example, the HSP70 and HSP90 genes are known to protect the body from the negative effects of oxidative stress and are used as a marker for heat stress in chickens [135]. Heat shock proteins are widespread stress proteins found in all living cells. Living cells trigger a “heat shock response”, which activates proteins to defend them from heat stress. The primary function of heat shock proteins is housekeeping; they maintain order in the cell by synthesizing other proteins while in a stressful environment or any pathological condition, their expression level increases, and they incline to attract immune cells at the respective site [136]. The molecular weight-classified HSPs were HSP40, HSP70, HSP90, HSP100, small HSPs, and chaperonins. HSPs are extracellular stress signals that activate immune cells in specific body areas amid stress and unwanted situations. Cell repair from HS damage requires HSP70. HSPs are heat polypeptides created by high temperature, hence increased HSP expression during HS improves living cell tolerance to HS. One of the most studied heat shock protein families, HSP70 and 90, regulate cell cycle and cell tolerance [137]. In a heat stress environment, HSPs fix damaged proteins. As molecular chaperones, HSP 70 is low in normal climates, but muscle HSP levels rise rapidly during cellular stress (hyperthermia, oxidative stress, changes in pH). High HSP levels alter gene expression, remodeling skeletal muscles [138]. Many broiler chicken investigations have shown that the HSP family repairs damaged cells, and HSP70 is expressed in the muscles, liver, heart, kidney, and blood vessels during acute stress [139]. During AHS, broiler chicken muscle cells express HSP70 and 90. AHS also induces chicken kidney HSP70 and 90 protein and mRNA expression.
The naked neck gene: The naked neck (Na), dwarf (Dw), and frizzle (F) genes of chickens are thought to be candidates for thermal stress resistance. They represent a suitable, sustainable, and cost-effective solution to the heat stress problem. Utilizing favorable heat-resistant genes such as slow feathering (K), frizzle (F), and naked neck (Na) may increase heat tolerance, growth performance, and reproductive characteristics in chickens [140,141]. Homozygous chickens with the naked neck gene (Na) have roughly 40% less feather coverage than normal plumaged chicken, while heterozygous siblings have between 20% and 30% less [140,141]. When subjected to high ambient temperatures, their reduced plumage allows them to disperse heat. The Na chicken line has also exhibited improved immunity and output. When exposed to heat, birds with Na surpassed other feathered birds, according to research. This gene has been revealed to survive harsh environmental changes like high temperatures [142]. The lack of feathers on the neck increases the available space for heat dissipation and prevents heat insulation, allowing birds to survive the sweltering heat. Refs. [143,144] observed that in indigenous Egyptian breeds grown in hot stress, the gene improved thermotolerance via increasing HSP70 gene expression. Compared to other species, naked-necked birds exhibited significantly lower H/L ratios and total plasma cholesterol throughout the summer [145]. Under heat stress, laying chickens with the naked neck gene had higher egg weights, quality, and number [146]. The Na gene could be regarded as a marker gene because different genotypes can be identified by visual inspection of their feathers after hatching.
The frizzle gene (F): The frizzle gene is another potential target for creating heat-tolerant chickens. The frizzle gene (F) is a partly dominant gene that lowers feather intensity, boosting birds’ ability to dissipate excessive heat [144]. According to [15,145], the frizzle (F) gene causes the form of the feather to curl, reducing its weight and increasing heat emission from the body. Adult frizzled birds’ feathers (FF and Ff) are more brittle and curled than in the normal condition (ff). With the exception of sexual maturity under heat stress, ref. [146] discovered a significant interaction between environmental temperature and feathering genotype (FF) in all reproductive variables, including chick production, hatchability, and egg production. The scientists reported that regularly feathered chicken showed a notable drop in all reproductive indices at higher temperatures when compared to frizzle-feathered chicken. The findings of [147] demonstrated that frizzle layers outperformed conventional feathered chickens in a climate chamber at high temperatures. Commercialization of naked-necked and frizzled birds will benefit developing countries in tropical regions. The combination of the Na and F genes results in increased heat dissipation and low feather intensity, particularly when the Na gene is homozygous (NaNaF-), and the double heterozygous (Na/Na F/f) broiler has an additive effect [148].
Nutritional Interventions and Feed Modifications: Broiler feed conversion is prone to variability because of temperature fluctuations at both the seasonal and ambient levels. Research consistently indicates that elevated temperatures reduce the effectiveness of feed energy conversion into productive output. Although a reduction in feed intake does contribute to the diminished performance of broilers under high temperatures, the raised temperature itself is primarily responsible for a substantial percentage of the effect [149]. To address these obstacles, it is customary in the formulation of broiler feeds intended for hot climates to augment the energy content by the use of fat. In addition to increasing energy consumption, this lessens the specific dynamic effect of the diet, hence assisting birds in managing heat stress more effectively [149]. It is advisable to implement nutritional modifications, such as increasing protein intake and decreasing fat content, in order to mitigate the detrimental consequences of heat stress [150]. Vitamin supplementation, customized to specific needs and situations, is effective in minimizing the negative effects of heat stress on poultry, improving performance, and boosting immune function [149]. Proper management and awareness of each vitamin’s role helps to improve the health of heat-stressed birds.
In addition to augmenting energy intake, the inclusion of fat in the diet also improves the energy content of other components present in the feed. It has been shown to enhance nutritional utilization by decreasing the rate of food passage in the gastrointestinal tract [151,152]. It has been demonstrated that lower protein diets supplemented with restricted amino acids produce superior effects during periods of high temperature than high protein diets. The objective of these dietary approaches is to enhance the efficiency of feed conversion while minimizing the adverse effects of heat stress on the performance of broilers (Table 2).

7. Climate Change and Future Projections

Amidst the increasing difficulties presented by climate change, the broiler chicken industry in the United States is devising strategies to achieve sustainable practices and transformative resilience. In anticipation of the anticipated consequences of increased frequency, intensity, and duration of heat stress, the poultry industry is actively adopting constructive future strategies. Infrastructure improvements and technological advancements emerge as critical components of this paradigm shift. Sophisticated ventilation systems, intelligent housing designs, and precise climate control mechanisms are being developed by the industry [174]. These advancements not only alleviate the consequences of heat stress on broiler chicks but also establish conditions that are favorable for their maximum development. The concept of genetic selection in relation to climatic resilience becomes a fundamental pillar of progress. Efforts are being made by scientists and breeders to generate broiler chicken lines that possess improved heat tolerance [175]. Adopting this proactive stance guarantees that forthcoming generations of broilers will be more adept at flourishing amidst the ever-changing environmental circumstances, thus promoting sustainability and adaptability. Environmental stewardship and sustainable practices are emerging as guiding principles. The agricultural sector’s transition towards environmentally sustainable and resource-efficient practices demonstrates a dedication to accountable farming. The environmental well-being and longevity of broiler chicken production are enhanced by the implementation of sustainable measures such as optimized feed formulas and waste management systems [176]. Future investment in climate-resilient poultry breed research is crucial. Ongoing research contributes to the advancement of knowledge regarding the complex interplay among genetics, climate, and poultry health. This understanding not only strengthens the fortitude of broiler chickens but also provides insights for more extensive approaches to sustainable poultry agriculture. Fostering policy support and incorporating climate measures are fundamental components that establish a conducive milieu for the poultry sector. Policymakers are increasingly recognizing the imperative of harmonizing agricultural policy with measures for climate adaptation. To encourage the adoption of sustainable and climate-smart practices, they are offering vital incentives and tools.

8. Future Directions

The resolution of heat stress issues in broiler production necessitates the implementation of inventive approaches guided by comprehensive study and technical progressions. By combining intelligent sensors and real-time data analytics, precision agriculture optimizes environmental conditions for the comfort and performance of broiler chickens. The development of genetically resilient broiler strains that can endure various climate-related difficulties and maintain productivity is entirely dependent on genomic selection for multi-trait resilience, which extends beyond mere heat tolerance. The implementation of climate-adaptive housing designs, which incorporate innovative ventilation systems and modular structures, plays a crucial role in mitigating the adverse effects of severe temperatures on broiler welfare and fostering a favorable living environment. Nutritional techniques that prioritize the inclusion of immune-boosting components and antioxidants in broiler diets are of utmost importance in minimizing the physiological consequences of heat stress [11].

9. Conclusions

Broiler production faces heat stress, which requires scientific advances and adaptive solutions. Today, heat stress requires a complex approach, echoing Darwin’s “Difficulties of the theory”. A revolutionary resilience journey is built on precision agriculture, genetic selection, and sustainable practices. With sophisticated sensors and real-time data analytics, precision agriculture optimizes climate management for broiler well-being. Genomic selection helps broiler breeds withstand climate change’s many difficulties.
Climate-adaptive housing delivers broilers with physiologically adjusted habitats in this environment. Nutritionally, antioxidants and immune-boosting ingredients protect broilers from heat stress. In broiler production, agroecological approaches offer harmony and sustainability. Comprehensive policies assist the industry’s harmonized climate response at the crescendo. As the sector navigates heat stress, these coordinated efforts move broiler production toward resilience and sustainability. Innovation, genetics, nutrition, and policy help the broiler business push past adaptation and embrace climate change for sustainable growth.

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: O.O.A., D.A.E. and Y.O.F.; acquisition of laboratory data: not applicable; data analysis and interpretation: D.A.E., O.O.A. and Y.O.F.; drafting of the manuscript and/or critical revision of important intellectual content: O.O.A., D.A.E. and Y.O.F. Authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Institute for Food and Agriculture of the United States Department of Agriculture, Evans Allen Project No. NC.X-329-5-20-120-1, in the Agricultural Research Program, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Tona, G.O. Current and future improvements in livestock nutrition and feed resources. Anim. Husb. Nutr. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Al-Abdullatif, A.; Azzam, M.M. Effects of Hot Arid Environments on the Production Performance, Carcass Traits, and Fatty Acids Composition of Breast Meat in Broiler Chickens. Life 2023, 13, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mangan, M.; Siwek, M. Strategies to combat heat stress in poultry production—A review. Authorea 2023. preprints. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Livingston, M.L.; Pokoo-Aikins, A.; Frost, T.; Laprade, L.; Hoang, V.; Nogal, B.; Phillips, C.; Cowieson, A.J. Effect of heat stress, dietary electrolytes, and vitamins E and C on growth performance and blood biochemistry of the broiler chicken. Front. Anim. Sci. 2022, 3, 807267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elitok, B.; Bingüler, N. Importance of stress factors in poultry. Juniper Online J. Case Stud. 2018, 7, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ghanima, M.M.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Othman, S.I.; Taha, A.E.; Allam, A.A.; Abdel-Moneim, A.E. Impact of different rearing systems on growth, carcass traits, oxidative stress biomarkers, and humoral immunity of broilers exposed to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 3070–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Abo-Al-Ela, H.G.; El-Kassas, S.; El-Naggar, K.; Abdo, S.E.; Jahejo, A.R.; Al Wakeel, R.A. Stress and immunity in poultry: Light management and nanotechnology as effective immune enhancers to fight stress. Cell Stress Chaperones 2021, 26, 457–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hofmann, T.; Schmucker, S.S.; Bessei, W.; Grashorn, M.; Stefanski, V. Impact of housing environment on the immune system in chickens: A review. Animals 2020, 10, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Soliman, A.; Safwat, A.M. Climate change impact on immune status and productivity of poultry as well as the quality of meat and egg products. In Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture and Food Security in Egypt: Land and Water Resources—Smart Farming—Livestock, Fishery, and Aquacultucre; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 481–498. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tsiouris, V.; Georgopoulou, I.; Batzios, C.; Pappaioannou, N.; Ducatelle, R.; Fortomaris, P. Heat stress as a predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis in broiler chicks. Avian Pathol. 2018, 47, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lara, L.J.; Rostagno, M.H. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals 2013, 3, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Teeter, R.G.; Smith, M.O.; Owens, F.N.; Arp, S.C.; Sangiah, S.; Breazile, J.E. Chronic heat stress and respiratory alkalosis: Occurrence and treatment in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 1985, 64, 1060–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sohail, M.U.; Ijaz, A.; Yousaf, M.S.; Ashraf, K.; Zaneb, H.; Aleem, M.; Rehman, H. Alleviation of cyclic heat stress in broilers by dietary supplementation of mannan-oligosaccharide and Lactobacillus-based probiotic: Dynamics of cortisol, thyroid hormones, cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and humoral immunity. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1934–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Goo, D.; Kim, J.H.; Park, G.H.; Delos Reyes, J.B.; Kil, D.Y. Effect of heat stress and stocking density on growth performance, breast meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Animals 2019, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, H.; Jiao, H.C.; Buyse, J.; Decuypere, E. Strategies for preventing heat stress in poultry. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2006, 62, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Purswell, J.L.; Dozier, W.A., III; Olanrewaju, H.A.; Davis, J.D.; Xin, H.; Gates, R.S. Effect of temperature-humidity index on live performance in broiler chickens grown from 49 to 63 days of age. In Proceedings of the 9th International Livestock Environment Symposium (ILES IX), Valencia, Spain, 8–12 July 2012; p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  17. Olanrewaju, H.A.; Purswell, J.L.; Collier, S.D.; Branton, S.L. Effect of ambient temperature and light intensity on physiological reactions of heavy broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2668–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lin, H.; Zhang, H.F.; Jiao, H.C.; Zhao, T.; Sui, S.J.; Gu, X.H.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Buyse, J.; Decuypere, E. Thermoregulation responses of broiler chickens to humidity at different ambient temperatures. I. One Week Age. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 1166–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yahav, S. Relative humidity at moderate ambient temperatures: Its effect on male broiler chickens and turkeys. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rostagno, M.H. Effects of heat stress on the gut health of poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Saeed, M.; Abbas, G.; Alagawany, M.; Kamboh, A.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; Chao, S. Heat stress management in poultry farms: A comprehensive overview. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 84, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Oke, O.E.; Oso, O.M.; Logunleko, M.O.; Uyanga, V.A.; Akinyemi, F.; Okeniyi, F.A.; Akosile, O.A.; Baloyi, J.J.; Onagbesan, O.M. Adaptation of the White Fulani cattle to the tropical environment. J. Therm. Biol. 2022, 110, 103372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oke, O.E.; Oni, A.I.; Adebambo, P.O.; Oso, O.M.; Adeoye, M.M.; Lawal, T.G.; Afolayan, T.R.; Ogunbajo, O.E.; Ojelade, D.I.; Bakre, O.A. Evaluation of light colour manipulation on physiological response and growth performance of broiler chickens. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Clark, J.A. Environmental Aspects of Housing for Animal Production; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. Walsberg, G.E. Coat color and solar heat gain in animals. Bioscience 1983, 33, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiong Reddy, R.A.; Praveen, P.; Anuradha, P.P. Assessment of air quality in a poultry house. J. Ind. Pollut. Control 2007, 23, 369–372. [Google Scholar]
  27. Juul-Madsen, H.R.; Su, G.; Sørensen, P. Influence of early or late start of first feeding on growth and immune phenotype of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2004, 45, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Teyssier, J.R.; Brugaletta, G.; Sirri, F.; Dridi, S.; Rochell, S.J. A review of heat stress in chickens. Part II: Insights into protein and energy utilization and feeding. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 943612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Belhadj Slimen, I.; Najar, T.; Ghram, A.; Dabbebi, H.; Ben Mrad, M.; Abdrabbah, M. Reactive oxygen species, heat stress and oxidative-induced mitochondrial damage. A review. Int. J. Hyperth. 2014, 30, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mohamed, A.S.A.; Lozovskiy, A.R.; Ali, A.M.A. Nutritional strategies to alleviate heat stress effects through feed restrictions and feed additives (vitamins and minerals) in broilers under summer conditions. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol. 2020, 7, 123–131. [Google Scholar]
  31. Renema, R.A.; Robinson, F.E. Defining normal: Comparison of feed restriction and full feeding of female broiler breeders. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2004, 60, 508–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martínez, Y.; Almendares, C.I.; Hernández, C.J.; Avellaneda, M.C.; Urquía, A.M.; Valdivié, M. Effect of acetic acid and sodium bicarbonate supplemented to drinking water on water quality, growth performance, organ weights, cecal traits and hematological parameters of young broilers. Animals 2021, 11, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yahav, S. Alleviating heat stress in domestic fowl: Different strategies. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2009, 65, 719–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wilson, W.O.; Edwards, W.H. Response of hens under thermal stress to dehydration and chilled drinking water. Am. J. Physiol.-Leg. Content 1952, 169, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Syafwan, S.; Kwakkel, R.P.; Verstegen, M.W.A. Heat stress and feeding strategies in meat-type chickens. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 67, 653–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jéquier, E.; Constant, F. Water as an essential nutrient: The physiological basis of hydration. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ghosh, S.; Majumder, D.; Goswami, R. Broiler performance at different stocking density. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2012, 46, 381–384. [Google Scholar]
  38. Xiong, X.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Yu, C.; Peng, H.; Chen, J.; Xia, B.; Du, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z. Effects of stocking density on performance, egg quality, reproductive hormones, and antioxidant capacity in egg-laying ducks. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2020, 48, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heidari, S.; Toghyani, M. Effect of stocking density and methionine levels on growth performance and immunity of broiler chicks. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2018, 8, 483–489. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, W.; Wei, F.; Xu, B.; Sun, Q.; Deng, W.; Ma, H.; Bai, J.; Li, S. Effect of stocking density and alpha-lipoic acid on the growth performance, physiological and oxidative stress and immune response of broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Law, F.L.; Zulkifli, I.; Soleimani, A.F.; Liang, J.B.; Awad, E.A. Effects of reduced-protein diets supplemented with protease in broiler chickens under high stocking density. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2019, 59, 2212–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Beg, M.; Baqui, M.A.; Sarker, N.R.; Hossain, M.M. Effect of stocking density and feeding regime on performance of broiler chicken in summer season. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2011, 10, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Madkour, M.; Salman, F.M.; El-Wardany, I.; Abdel-Fattah, S.A.; Alagawany, M.; Hashem, N.M.; Abdelnour, S.A.; El-Kholy, M.S.; Dhama, K. Mitigating the detrimental effects of heat stress in poultry through thermal conditioning and nutritional manipulation. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 103, 103169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nienaber, J.A.; Hahn, G.L. Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2007, 52, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Humphrey, T. Are happy chickens safer chickens? Poultry welfare and disease susceptibility. Br. Poult. Sci. 2006, 47, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rostagno, M.H. Can stress in farm animals increase food safety risk? Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dadgar, S.; Lee, E.S.; Leer, T.; Burlinguette, N.; Classen, H.L.; Crowe, T.G.; Shand, P.J. Effect of microclimate temperature during transportation of broiler chickens on quality of the pectoralis major muscle. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Domingues, A.R.; Pires, S.M.; Halasa, T.; Hald, T. Source attribution of human salmonellosis using a meta-analysis of case-control studies of sporadic infections. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 140, 959–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kogut, M.H. The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 250, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kers, J.G.; Velkers, F.C.; Fischer, E.A.; Hermes, G.D.; Stegeman, J.A.; Smidt, H. Host and environmental factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in chickens. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Slawinska, A.; Mendes, S.; Dunislawska, A.; Siwek, M.; Zampiga, M.; Sirri, F.; Meluzzi, A.; Tavaniello, S.; Maiorano, G. Avian model to mitigate gut-derived immune response and oxidative stress during heat. Biosystems 2019, 178, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kadykalo, S.; Roberts, T.; Thompson, M.; Wilson, J.; Lang, M.; Espeisse, O. The value of anticoccidials for sustainable global poultry production. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 51, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lambert, G.P. Stress-induced gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction and its inflammatory effects. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87 (Suppl. S14), E101–E108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Quinteiro-Filho, W.M.; Calefi, A.S.; Cruz, D.; Aloia, T.; Zager, A.; Astolfi-Ferreira, C.S.; Ferreira, J.P.; Sharif, S.; Palermo-Neto, J. Heat stress decreases expression of the cytokines, avian β-defensins 4 and 6 and Toll-like receptor 2 in broiler chickens infected with Salmonella Enteritidis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2017, 186, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Alhenaky, A.; Abdelqader, A.; Abuajamieh, M.; Al-Fataftah, A. The effect of heat stress on intestinal integrity and Salmonella invasion in broiler birds. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 70, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, Q.J.; Liu, N.; Wu, X.H.; Wang, G.Y.; Lin, L. Glutamine alleviates heat stress-induced impairment of intestinal morphology, intestinal inflammatory response, and barrier integrity in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 2675–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Downing, J.E.; Miyan, J.A. Neural immunoregulation: Emerging roles for nerves in immune homeostasis and disease. Immunol. Today 2000, 21, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Butts, C.L.; Sternberg, E.M. Neuroendocrine factors alter host defense by modulating immune function. Cell. Immunol. 2008, 252, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Marketon, J.I.W.; Glaser, R. Stress hormones and immune function. Cell. Immunol. 2008, 252, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Padgett, D.A.; Glaser, R. How stress influences the immune response. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Dhabhar, F.S. Effects of stress on immune function: The good, the bad, and the beautiful. Immunol. Res. 2014, 58, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Niu, Z.Y.; Liu, F.Z.; Yan, Q.L.; Li, W.C. Effects of different levels of vitamin E on growth performance and immune responses of broilers under heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 2101–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bartlett, J.R.; Smith, M.O. Effects of different levels of zinc on the performance and immunocompetence of broilers under heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 1580–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Aengwanich, W. Pathological changes and the effects of ascorbic acid on lesion scores of bursa of Fabricius in broilers under chronic heat stress. Res. J. Vet. Sci. 2010, 3, 74–78. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bozkurt, M.; Küçükyilmaz, K.; Catli, A.U.; Çınar, M.; Bintaş, E.; Çöven, F. Performance, egg quality, and immune response of laying hens fed diets supplemented with mannan-oligosaccharide or an essential oil mixture under moderate and hot environmental conditions. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Deng, W.; Dong, X.F.; Tong, J.M.; Zhang, Q. The probiotic Bacillus licheniformis ameliorates heat stress-induced impairment of egg production, gut morphology, and intestinal mucosal immunity in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Prieto, M.T.; Campo, J.L. Effect of heat and several additives related to stress levels on fluctuating asymmetry, heterophil: Lymphocyte ratio, and tonic immobility duration in White Leghorn chicks. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2071–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Deeb, N.; Shlosberg, A.; Cahaner, A. Genotype-by-environment interaction with broiler genotypes differing in growth rate. 4. Association between responses to heat stress and to cold-induced ascites. Poult. Sci. 2002, 81, 1454–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ghazi, S.H.; Habibian, M.; Moeini, M.M.; Abdolmohammadi, A.R. Effects of different levels of organic and inorganic chromium on growth performance and immunocompetence of broilers under heat stress. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 146, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sohail, M.U.; Hume, M.E.; Byrd, J.A.; Nisbet, D.J.; Ijaz, A.; Sohail, A.; Shabbir, M.Z.; Rehman, H. Effect of supplementation of prebiotic mannan-oligosaccharides and probiotic mixture on growth performance of broilers subjected to chronic heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2235–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Sokołowicz, Z.; Krawczyk, J.; Świątkiewicz, S. 4. Quality of poultry meat from native chicken breeds—A review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016, 16, 347–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ayo, J.O.; Obidi, J.A.; Rekwot, P.I. Effects of heat stress on the well-being, fertility, and hatchability of chickens in the northern Guinea savannah zone of Nigeria: A review. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2011, 2011, 838606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Slawinska, A.; Zampiga, M.; Sirri, F.; Meluzzi, A.; Bertocchi, M.; Tavaniello, S.; Maiorano, G. Impact of galactooligosaccharides delivered in ovo on mitigating negative effects of heat stress on performance and welfare of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Imik, H.; Ozlu, H.; Gumus, R.E.C.E.P.; Atasever, M.A.; Urcar, S.; Atasever, M. Effects of ascorbic acid and α-lipoic acid on performance and meat quality of broilers subjected to heat stress. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012, 53, 800–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Alaqil, A.A.; Abd El-Atty, H.K.; Abbas, A.O. Intermittent Lighting Program Relieves the Deleterious Effect of Heat Stress on Growth, Stress Biomarkers, Physiological Status, and Immune Response of Broiler Chickens. Animals 2022, 12, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jahanian, R.; Rasouli, E. Dietary chromium methionine supplementation could alleviate immunosuppressive effects of heat stress in broiler chicks. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 3355–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Greene, E.S.; Maynard, C.; Owens, C.M.; Meullenet, J.-F.; Dridi, S. Effects of Herbal Adaptogen Feed-Additive on Growth Performance, Carcass Parameters, and Muscle Amino Acid Profile in Heat-Stressed Modern Broilers. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 784952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Awad, E.; Idrus, Z.; Farjam, A.S.; Bello, A.O. Growth performance, duodenal morphology and the caecal microbial population in female broiler chickens fed glycine-fortified low protein diets under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 2018, 59, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. El-Din, A.E.; Abou-Shehema, B.M. Effect of ascorbic acid or increasing metabolizable energy level with or without supplementation of some essential amino acids on productive and physiological traits of slow-growing chicks exposed to chronic heat stress. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 95, 744–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Attia, Y.A.; Al-Harthi, M.A.; Elnaggar, A.S. Productive, physiological and immunological responses of two broiler strains fed different dietary regimens and exposed to heat stress. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 17, 686–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kutlu, H.R. Influences of wet feeding and supplementation with ascorbic acid on performance and carcass composition of broiler chicks exposed to a high ambient temperature. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2001, 54, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Olfati, A.; Mojtahedin, A.; Sadeghi, T.; Akbari, M.; Martínez-Pastor, F. Comparison of growth performance and immune responses of broiler chicks reared under heat stress, cold stress and thermoneutral conditions. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2018, 16, e0505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Newell, D.G.; Koopmans, M.; Verhoef, L.; Duizer, E.; Aidara-Kane, A.; Sprong, H.; Opsteegh, M.; Langelaar, M.; Threfall, J.; Scheutz, F. Food-borne diseases—The challenges of 20 years ago still persist while new ones continue to emerge. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139, S3–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Regulation of the stress response by the gut microbiota: Implications for psychoneuroendocrinology. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2012, 37, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Burkholder, K.M.; Thompson, K.L.; Einstein, M.E.; Applegate, T.J.; Patterson, J.A. Influence of stressors on normal intestinal microbiota, intestinal morphology, and susceptibility to Salmonella enteritidis colonization in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 1734–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Freestone, P.P.; Sandrini, S.M.; Haigh, R.D.; Lyte, M. Microbial endocrinology: How stress influences susceptibility to infection. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Verbrugghe, E.; Boyen, F.; Gaastra, W.; Bekhuis, L.; Leyman, B.; Van Parys, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Pasmans, F. The complex interplay between stress and bacterial infections in animals. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 155, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jorgensen, F.; Ellis-Iversen, J.; Rushton, S.; Bull, S.A.; Harris, S.A.; Bryan, S.J.; Gonzalez, A.; Humphrey, T.J. Influence of season and geography on Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli subtypes in housed broiler flocks reared in Great Britain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3741–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zdragas, A.; Mazaraki, K.; Vafeas, G.; Giantzi, V.; Papadopoulos, T.; Ekateriniadou, L. Prevalence, seasonal occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in poultry retail products in Greece. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 55, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, Z.Y.; Jia, G.Q.; Zuo, J.J.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, J.; Ren, L.; Feng, D.Y. Effects of constant and cyclic heat stress on muscle metabolism and meat quality of broiler breast fillet and thigh meat. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2931–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ekunseitan, D.A.; Yusuf, A.O.; Ekunseitan, O.F.; Alao, S.O.; Allinson, A.Z. Dietary supplementation of Vitamin E and selenium on performance and oxidative stability of meat of broiler chickens in a hot climate. Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 2021, 54, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. El Rammouz, R.; Berri, C.; Le Bihan-Duval, E.; Babile, R.; Fernandez, X. Breed differences in the biochemical determinism of ultimate pH in breast muscles of broiler chickens—A key role of AMP deaminase? Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1445–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hao, Y.; Gu, X.H. Effects of heat shock protein 90 expressionon pectoralis major oxidation in broilers exposed to acute heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2709–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zaboli, G.; Huang, X.; Feng, X.; Ahn, D.U. How can heat stress affect chicken meat quality?—A review. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, C. Modelling and Analysis of Energy Metabolism in Postmortem Muscle. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  96. Terlouw, E.M.C.; Arnould, C.; Auperin, B.; Berri, C.; Le Bihan-Duval, E.; Deiss, V.; Lefèvre, F.; Lensink, B.; Mounier, L. Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: Current status and possible future research. Animal 2008, 2, 1501–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sahin, K.; Sahin, N.; Kucuk, O.; Hayirli, A.; Prasad, A.S. Role of dietary zinc in heat-stressed poultry: A review. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 2176–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Meng, Q.; Velalar, C.N.; Ruan, R. Regulating the age-related oxidative damage, mitochondrial integrity, and antioxidative enzyme activity in Fischer 344 rats by supplementation of the antioxidant epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Rejuvenation Res. 2008, 11, 649–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Song, D.J.; King, A.J. Effects of heat stress on broiler meat quality. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2015, 71, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ekunseitan, D.; Alagbada, I.; Ekunseitan, O.; Asa, J.; Adegun, W.; Alao, O. Meat Quality Characteristics of Chickens fed with Dietary Supplementation of Vitamin E and selenium in the tropics. J. Agric. Sci. Environ. 2022, 22, 72–84. [Google Scholar]
  101. Gregory, N.G. How climatic changes could affect meat quality. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1866–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Strasburg, G.M.; Chiang, W. Pale, soft, exudative turkey—The role of ryanodine receptor variation in meat quality. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dröge, W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82, 47–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Estévez, M. Oxidative damage to poultry: From farm to fork. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1368–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Mujahid, A.; Yoshiki, Y.; Akiba, Y.; Toyomizu, M. Superoxide radical production in chicken skeletal muscle induced by acute heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mujahid, M.S.; Diez Roux, A.V.; Morenoff, J.D.; Raghunathan, T. Assessing the measurement properties of neighborhood scales: From psychometrics to ecometrics. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 165, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kumar, B.; Manuja, A.; Aich, P. Stress and its impact on farm animals. Front. Biosci. Elite 2012, 4, 1759–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Lu, Z.; He, X.F.; Ma, B.B.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.L.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, G.H.; Gao, F. Increased fat synthesis and limited apolipoprotein B cause lipid accumulation in the liver of broiler chickens exposed to chronic heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 3695–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Forrest, J.C.; Morgan, M.T.; Borggaard, C.; Rasmussen, A.J.; Jespersen, B.L.; Andersen, J.R. Development of technology for the early post mortem prediction of water holding capacity and drip loss in fresh pork. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Woelfel, R.L.; Owens, C.M.; Hirschler, E.M.; Martinez-Dawson, R.; Sams, A.R. The characterization and incidence of pale, soft, and exudative broiler meat in a commercial processing plant. Poult. Sci. 2002, 81, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Hangalapura, B.N.; Nieuwland, M.; Buyse, J.; Kemp, B.; Parmentier, H.K. Effect of duration of cold stress on plasma adrenal and thyroid hormone levels and immune responses in chicken lines divergently selected for antibody responses. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1644–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Martello, L.S.; Savastano Junior, H.; Silva, S.L.; Balieiro, J.C.C. Alternative body sites for heat stress measurement in milking cows under tropical conditions and their relationship to the thermal discomfort of the animals. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2010, 54, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Joy, A.; Dunshea, F.R.; Leury, B.J.; Clarke, I.J.; DiGiacomo, K.; Chauhan, S.S. Resilience of small ruminants to climate change and increased environmental temperature: A review. Animals 2020, 10, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Fedde, M.R. Relationship of structure and function of the avian respiratory system to disease susceptibility. Poult. Sci. 1998, 77, 1130–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Nofal, M.E.; Magda, A.G.; Mousa, S.; Doaa, M.M.; Bealsh, A. Effect of dietary betaine supplementation on productive, physiological and immunological performance and carcass characteristic of growing developed chicks uinder the condition of heat stress. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J. 2015, 35, 237. [Google Scholar]
  116. Nascimento, S.T.; Silva, I.J.O.d.; Mourão, G.B.; Castro, A.C.d. Bands of respiratory rate and cloacal temperature for different broiler chicken strains. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2012, 41, 1318–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Iyasere, O.S. Effect of Heat and Physiological Stress on the Growth Performance, Physiology and Welfare of Broiler Chickens. Ph.D. Thesis, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  118. Mitchell, M.A.; Kettlewell, P.J. Physiological stress and welfare of broiler chickens in transit: Solutions not problems! Poult. Sci. 1998, 77, 1803–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Garriga, C.; Hunter, R.R.; Amat, C.; Planas, J.M.; Mitchell, M.A.; Moretó, M. Heat stress increases apical glucose transport in the chicken jejunum. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2006, 290, R195–R201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Star, L.; Decuypere, E.; Parmentier, H.K.; Kemp, B. Effect of single or combined climatic and hygienic stress in four-layer lines: 2. Endocrine and oxidative stress responses. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Quinteiro-Filho, W.M.; Gomes, A.; Pinheiro, M.L.; Ribeiro, A.; Ferraz-de-Paula, V.; Astolfi-Ferreira, C.S.; Ferreira, A.J.P.; Palermo-Neto, J. Heat stress impairs performance and induces intestinal inflammation in broiler chickens infected with Salmonella Enteritidis. Avian Pathol. 2012, 41, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. He, S.P.; Arowolo, M.A.; Medrano, R.F.; Li, S.; Yu, Q.F.; Chen, J.Y.; He, J.H. Impact of heat stress and nutritional interventions on poultry production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Etches, R.J.; John, T.M.; Gibbins, A.V. Behavioural, physiological, neuroendocrine and molecular responses to heat stress. In Poultry Production in Hot Climates; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2008; pp. 48–79. [Google Scholar]
  124. Mack, L.A.; Felver-Gant, J.N.; Dennis, R.L.; Cheng, H.W. Genetic variations alter production and behavioral responses following heat stress in 2 strains of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Elnagar, S.A.; Scheideler, S.E.; Beck, M.M. Reproductive hormones, hepatic deiodinase messenger ribonucleic acid, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-immunoreactive cells in hypothalamus in the heat stress-induced or chemically induced hypothyroid laying hen. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2001–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Gonzalez-Rivas, P.A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Ha, M.; Fegan, N.; Dunshea, F.R.; Warner, R.D. Effects of heat stress on animal physiology, metabolism, and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2020, 162, 108025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Pirkkala, L.; Nykänen, P.; Sistonen, L. Roles of the heat shock transcription factors in regulation of the heat shock response and beyond. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 1118–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Abdo, S.E.; El-Kassas, S.; El-Nahas, A.F.; Mahmoud, S. Modulatory effect of monochromatic blue light on heat stress response in commercial broilers. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1351945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Sahin, K.; Orhan, C.; Tuzcu, M.; Sahin, N.; Hayirli, A.; Bilgili, S.; Kucuk, O. Lycopene activates antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Mahmoud, H.E.; Ijiri, D.; Ebeid, T.A.; Ohtsuka, A. Effects of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on growth performance, antioxidative status, and immunity in broiler chickens under thermoneutral and high ambient temperature conditions. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 53, 274–283. [Google Scholar]
  131. Van Goor, A.; Bolek, K.J.; Ashwell, C.M.; Persia, M.E.; Rothschild, M.F.; Schmidt, C.J. Identification of quantitative trait loci for body temperature, body weight, breast yield, and digestibility in an advanced intercross line of chickens under heat stress. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2015, 47, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Kumar, M.; Ratwan, P.; Dahiya, S.P.; Nehra, A.K. Climate change and heat stress: Impact on production, reproduction and growth performance of poultry and its mitigation using genetic strategies. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 97, 102867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Nawaz, A.H.; Lin, S.; Wang, F.; Zheng, J.; Sun, J.; Zhang, W.; Jiao, Z.; Zhu, Z.; An, L.; Zhang, L. Investigating the heat tolerance and production performance in local chicken breed having normal and dwarf size. Animal 2023, 17, 100707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Mujahid, A.; Akiba, Y.; Toyomizu, M. Acute heat stress induces oxidative stress and decreases adaptation in young white leghorn cockerels by downregulation of avian uncoupling protein. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Xie, J.; Tang, L.; Lu, L.; Zhang, L.; Xi, L.; Liu, H.-C.; Odle, J.; Luo, X. Differential Expression of Heat Shock Transcription Factors and Heat Shock Proteins after Acute and Chronic Heat Stress in Laying Chickens (Gallus gallus). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Shankar, K.; Mehendale, H.M. Heat-Shock Proteins. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bakthisaran, R.; Tangirala, R.; Rao, C.M. Small heat shock proteins: Role in cellular functions and pathology. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Proteins Proteom. 2015, 1854, 291–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Yu, J.; Bao, E. Effect of acute heat stress on heat shock protein 70 and its corresponding mRNA expression in the heart, liver, and kidney of broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 21, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Abdelnour, S.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; Arif, M.; Taha, A.E.; Noreldin, A.E. Stress biomarkers and proteomics alteration to thermal stress in ruminants: A review. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 79, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Fathi, M.M.; Galal, A.; El-Safty, S.; Mahrous, M. Naked neck and frizzle genes for improving chickens raised under high ambient temperature: I. Growth performance and egg production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2013, 69, 813–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fathi, M.M.; Galal, A.; Radwan, L.M.; Abou-Emera, O.K.; Al-Homidan, I.H. Using major genes to mitigate the deleterious effects of heat stress in poultry: An updated review. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 102157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Fisinin, V.I.; Kavtarashvili, A.S. Heat stress in poultry. II. Methods and techniques for prevention and alleviation. Сельскoхoзяйственная Биoлoгия 2015, 4, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nawaz, A.H.; Amoah, K.; Leng, Q.Y.; Zheng, J.H.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhang, L. Poultry response to heat stress: Its physiological, metabolic, and genetic implications on meat production and quality including strategies to improve broiler production in a warming world. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 699081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Galal, A.; Radwan, L.M.; Rezik, H.H.; Ayoub, H. Expression levels of HSP70 and CPT-1 in three local breeds of chickens reared under normal or heat stress conditions after the introduction of the naked neck gene. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 80, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wasti, S.; Sah, N.; Mishra, B. Impact of heat stress on poultry health and performances, and potential mitigation strategies. Animals 2020, 10, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Sharifi, A.R.; Horst, P.; Simianer, H. The effect of frizzle gene and dwarf gene on reproductive performance of broiler breeder dams under high and normal ambient temperatures. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2356–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Haaren-Kiso, A.V.; Horst, P.; Zarate, A.V. Direct and indirect effects of the frizzle gene (F) on the productive adaptability of laying hens. Anim. Res. Dev. 1995, 42, 98–114. [Google Scholar]
  148. Duah, K.K.; Essuman, E.K.; Boadu, V.G.; Olympio, O.S.; Akwetey, W. Comparative study of indigenous chickens on the basis of their health and performance. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 2286–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Daghir, N.J. Nutritional strategies to reduce heat stress in broilers and broiler breeders. Lohmann Inf. 2009, 44, 6–15. [Google Scholar]
  150. Ghazalah, A.A.; Abd-Elsamee, M.O.; Ali, A.M. Influence of dietary energy and poultry fat on the response of broiler chicks to heat therm. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2008, 7, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mateos, G.G.; Sell, J.L. Influence of fat and carbohydrate source on rate of food passage of semipurified diets for laying hens. Poult. Sci. 1981, 60, 2114–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Mateos, G.G.; Sell, J.L.; Eastwood, J.A. Rate of food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat. Poult. Sci. 1982, 61, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Suganya, T.; Senthilkumar, S.; Deepa, K.; Amutha, R. Nutritional management to alleviate heat stress in broilers. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol. 2015, 4, 661–666. [Google Scholar]
  154. Farghly, M.; Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E. Feeding time can alleviate negative effects of heat stress on performance, meat quality and health status of turkey. Br. Poult. Sci. 2018, 59, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sahin, K.; Onderci, M.; Sahin, N.; Gulcu, F.; Yıldız, N.; Avcı, M.; Kucuk, O. Responses of quail to dietary vitamin E and zinc picolinate at different environmental temperatures. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2006, 129, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kucuk, O.; Sahin, N.; Sahin, K. Supplemental zinc and vitamin A can alleviate negative effects of heat stress in broiler chickens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2003, 94, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Sahin, K.; Onderci, M.; Sahin, N.; Gursu, M.F.; Kucuk, O. Dietary vitamin C and folic acid supplementation ameliorates the detrimental effects of heat stress in Japanese quail. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 1882–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. McKee, J.S.; Harrison, P.C. Effects of supplemental ascorbic acid on the performance of broiler chickens exposed to multiple concurrent stressors. Poult. Sci. 1995, 74, 1772–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Sahin, K.; Kucuk, O. Effects of vitamin E and selenium on performance, digestibility of nutrients, and carcass characteristics of Japanese quails reared under heat stress (34 C). J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2001, 85, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Sohail, M.U.; Rahman, Z.U.; Ijaz, A.; Yousaf, M.S.; Ashraf, K.; Yaqub, T.; Zaneb, H.; Anwar, H.; Rehman, H. Single or combined effects of mannan-oligosaccharides and probiotic supplements on the total oxidants, total antioxidants, enzymatic antioxidants, liver enzymes, and serum trace minerals in cyclic heat-stressed broilers. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 2573–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Silva, V.K.; Silva, J.D.T.d.; Gravena, R.A.; Marques, R.H.; Hada, F.H.; Moraes, V.M.B.d. Yeast extract and prebiotic in pre-initial phase diet for broiler chickens raised under different temperatures. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Faseleh Jahromi, M.; Wesam Altaher, Y.; Shokryazdan, P.; Ebrahimi, R.; Ebrahimi, M.; Idrus, Z.; Tufarelli, V.; Liang, J.B. Dietary supplementation of a mixture of Lactobacillus strains enhances performance of broiler chickens raised under heat stress conditions. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2016, 60, 1099–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Song, J.; Xiao, K.; Ke, Y.L.; Jiao, L.F.; Hu, C.H.; Diao, Q.Y.; Shi, B.; Zou, X.T. Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Ashraf, S.; Zaneb, H.; Yousaf, M.S.; Ijaz, A.; Sohail, M.U.; Muti, S.; Usman, M.M.; Ijaz, S.; Rehman, H. Effect of dietary supplementation of prebiotics and probiotics on intestinal microarchitecture in broilers reared under cyclic heat stress. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2013, 97, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Zulkifli, I.; Abdullah, N.; Azrin, N.M.; Ho, Y.W. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Saeed, M.; Babazadeh, D.; Naveed, M.; Arain, M.A.; Hassan, F.U.; Chao, S. Reconsidering betaine as a natural anti-heat stress agent in poultry industry: A review. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2017, 49, 1329–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Arain, M.A.; Mei, Z.; Hassan, F.U.; Saeed, M.; Alagawany, M.; Shar, A.H.; Rajput, I.R. Lycopene: A natural antioxidant for prevention of heat-induced oxidative stress in poultry. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tanaka, T.; Shnimizu, M.; Moriwaki, H. Cancer chemoprevention by caroteno. Molecules 2012, 17, 3202–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Rehman, Z.U.; Chand, N.; Khan, R.U.; Naz, S.; Alhidary, I.A. Serum biochemical profile of two broiler strains supplemented with vitamin E, raw ginger (Zingiber officinale) and L-carnitine under high ambient temperatures. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 48, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, G.F.; Yang, Z.B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, W.R.; Jiang, S.Z.; Gai, G.S. Effects of ginger root (Zingiber officinale) processed to different particle sizes on growth performance, antioxidant status, and serum metabolites of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 2159–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Daneshyar, M.; Najafi, R. Effects of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) and Turmeric (Curcuma longa) Powder on Performance, Enzyme Activity, and Blood Parameters of Broiler Chickens Under Heat Stress. Poult. Sci. J. 2016, 4, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  172. Farah, N.; Benghuzzi, H.; Tucci, M.; Cason, Z. The effects of isolated antioxidants from black seed on the cellular metabolism of A549 cells. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2005, 41, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Mohammed, A.A.; Al-Suwaiegh, S.B. Effects of Nigella sativa on mammals’ health and production. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2016, 4, 630–636. [Google Scholar]
  174. Himeur, Y.; Alsalemi, A.; Bensaali, F.; Amira, A. Building power consumption datasets: Survey, taxonomy and future directions. Energy Build. 2020, 227, 110404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Castro, F.; Chai, L.; Arango, J.; Owens, C.; Smith, P.; Reichelt, S.; DuBois, C.; Menconi, A. Poultry industry paradigms: Connecting the dots. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2023, 32, 100310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Boliko, M.C. FAO and the situation of food security and nutrition in the world. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2019, 65, S4–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Impact of heat stress on different broiler strains. Each superscripts indicate the conclusion from each author and also the animal type/strain differs.
Table 1. Impact of heat stress on different broiler strains. Each superscripts indicate the conclusion from each author and also the animal type/strain differs.
StrainSexHousing Conditions Negative EffectsReferences
Hubbard-CobbMaleThermoneutral or heat-challenged conditionIncreased feed intake and higher FCR in HS, mortality[73]
Ross 308MaleThermoneutral group up to 35 days of age and then subjected to chronic HS (30 °C for 24 h/day)1 HS decrease in BW and feed consumption,
2 HS decreased daily weight gain,
daily feed intake
Increased FCR, increased mortality (5×), increase in rectal temperature
1 [4]



2 [74]
Mixed (males and female)24 °C (control),
34 °C HS
HS decreased body weight gain in male but had no effect on body weight gain in females, reduced feed consumption[75]
Cobb Mixed (male and female)20 °C (thermoneutral; TN conditions), or 27.8 °C (HS conditions)Lower final BW, BWG, FI, and FE[76]
Cobb500Male1 Thermoneutral temperature at 24 °C or heat stress at 35 °C1 FBW, BWG, and FI reduced by 20, 29, and 16 percent1 [14]
2 Temperature conditions (thermoneutral and heat stress)2 Lower feed intake, BW gain, and deteriorated feed conversion values2 [77]
3 Cyclic heat stress (HS, 35 °C from 9:30 am–5:30 pm); however, the rest of the chamber were maintained at thermoneutral conditions (24 °C, TN)3 HS reduced feed intake and body weight, body part weights3 [78]
Female23 °C (unheated), 34 °C for 7 h each day (cyclic heat), 34 (constant heat)Reduction in feed intake and decrease in growth rate[79]
Ross-708Mixed
sex
35 ± 2 °C from d 1 (HS)
and thermoneutral conditions
HS-CONT unsupplemented group had 18.3% less BW gain on d 21 and 49.6% less on d 42 as compared with the CONT group[71]
El-Salam strain, a white feather crossbredMaleHS (38 °C and 60% RH)BWG decreased, F:G was impaired. No effect on apparent digestibility of DM, OM, EE, and C
HS + AA: increased BWG and FI and improved F:G
[11,80]
Ross PM3 High ambient
temperature (35 to
37 °C for 8 h/d vs.
thermoneutral for 16
h/d)
Decreased FI and weight gain[81]
33 °C as HS, 12 °C as
cold stress, 23 °C (thermoneutral)
Lower feed intake, lower body
weight, higher FCR and water
intake
[82]
Table 2. An overview of nutritional strategies to reduce heat stress in birds.
Table 2. An overview of nutritional strategies to reduce heat stress in birds.
Nutritional StrategiesMethods/DosageBenefitsReference
Restricted feeding and wateringIncrease water intake, restrict feed or intermittent feed. Feed withdraw from 9:00 am to 4:30 pm and provide cool water at this time.Effective in lowering heat stress mortality. Starved birds produce 20% to 70% less metabolic heat than fed birds.[153,154]
Vitamins and mineral supplementationSupplementing poultry birds with vitamins C, E, and A, as well as minerals such as Fe, Zn, Se, and Cr in drinking water.It reduces mortality and promotes growth during heat stress.[155]
Increasing Zn (0, 30, and 60 mg/kg) and vitamin E (0, 250, and 500 mg/kg) supplements to diet.Enhanced FI consumption, development rate, and carcass quality in a linear fashion.[156]
Vitamin AVitamin A (15,000 IU) supplementation with drinking water.Enhanced live weight gain, feed efficiency, and carcass characteristics, as well as a reduction in serum MDA concentrations.[157]
Vitamin C Ascorbic acid (AA)High dose (1000 mg/kg) of AA supplementation in water.Increases broiler performance by decreasing heat stress reactions and lowering plasma corticosteroid levels.[158]
Decreases the respiratory quotient in broiler chickens that are under a lot of heat stress by focusing on increasing fatty acid oxidation.[159]
Vitamin EHigh dietary supplemental level of Vitamin E (250 mg/kg diet) into feed.Cell membrane damage and lipid peroxidation are prevented by vitamin E in the liver.[160]
Prebiotics (Bospro, Lacto-Sacc)Supplementation of 1 g/kg lactobacillus culture in the diet.Antibiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics can all influence the gut microbiota under heat stress.[98]
ProbioticsUse of prebiotic and probiotics.Modify gut microbiota to improve health status and performance throughout the summer season.[161]
Probiotic mixture(L. pentosus ITA23; L. acidophilus ITA44).Increased the number of enterococcus, bifidobacteria, and lactobacillus in the intestines of heat-stressed broilers.
An increase in the antioxidant capacity of the liver.
[162]
Probiotic mixture(B. licheniformis, B. subtilis, and L. plantarum).Enhanced the viable populations of lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in the small intestine, while coliforms reduced in broilers subjected to heat stress. Intestinal barrier function is improved and jejunal villus height is increased.[163]
Lactobacillus-based probiotics(L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. rhamnosus, B. bifidum, S. thermophilus, E. faecium, A. oryzae, and C. pintolopesii).In the duodenum and ileum of broilers that had lost height, depth, and surface area due to heat stress, the changes were reversed.
Kept the goblet cells performing their function.
[164]
Probiotic B. subtilis Broilers exhibit an elevated antibody response to NDV subsequent to heat stress.[165]
Herbal supplements and phytogenicUsing phytochemicals such as lycopene, anthocyanins, and gamma-glutamylethylamide, which can be found in papaya, guava, apricots, pink grapefruit, watermelon, and tomatoes.Reduce heat stress and enhance performance.
Increasing the level of serum growth hormone and alerting of heat shock genes in the immune system.
[166,167,168]
GingerThe inclusion of ginger in the diet of broilers experiencing heat stress at a concentration of 2%.Enhance biochemical blood parameters while bolstering performance and immunity.[169]
Adding 5 g of ginger per kilogram of feed to the diets of broilers.The activities of GSHPx and SOD were enhanced and the MDA of broilers was decreased for a duration of 3–6 weeks.[170]
Cinnamon powder0.5% cinnamon powder into a system.Blood variables are enhanced and performance is improved.
It was found that cinnamon supplements helped keep balance because of the lower pH and DM levels caused by heat stress.
[171]
Black cumin (Nigella sativa) seeds (NSS)Adding black cumin meal (10% to 20% of the feed), seeds (1% to 2% of the feed), or oil (0.5% to 1% of the feed) during very hot conditions.Reduced oxidative stress, raised serum MDA levels, and improved the birds’ performance. It also helped the health of brain and spinal cord tissues.[172,173]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Apalowo, O.O.; Ekunseitan, D.A.; Fasina, Y.O. Impact of Heat Stress on Broiler Chicken Production. Poultry 2024, 3, 107-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry3020010

AMA Style

Apalowo OO, Ekunseitan DA, Fasina YO. Impact of Heat Stress on Broiler Chicken Production. Poultry. 2024; 3(2):107-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry3020010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Apalowo, Oluwabunmi O., Deji A. Ekunseitan, and Yewande O. Fasina. 2024. "Impact of Heat Stress on Broiler Chicken Production" Poultry 3, no. 2: 107-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry3020010

APA Style

Apalowo, O. O., Ekunseitan, D. A., & Fasina, Y. O. (2024). Impact of Heat Stress on Broiler Chicken Production. Poultry, 3(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry3020010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop