Next Article in Journal
Seed Water Absorption, Germination, Emergence and Seedling Phenotypic Characterization of the Common Bean Landraces Differing in Seed Size and Color
Previous Article in Journal
Variation of Seed Traits and Initial Quality among Selected Cowpea, Mungbean, and Soybean Accessions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Response of Capsicum annuum L. Seedlings Raised in Pro Trays to Inoculation with AM Fungus Glomus bagyarajii and K Solubilizing Bacterium Frateuria aurantia

by
Vijaykumar B. Spoorthi
1,
Praveen Ranadev
2,
Revanna Ashwin
2 and
Joseph D. Bagyaraj
2,*
1
Department of Microbiology, St Joseph’s College (Autonomous), 36, Lalbagh Road, Bengaluru 560027, Karnataka, India
2
Centre for Natural Biological Resources and Community Development (CNBRCD), 41, RBI Colony, Anand Nagar, Bangalore 560024, Karnataka, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Seeds 2022, 1(4), 315-323; https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds1040026
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 24 November 2022

Abstract

:
Raising vegetable seedlings in pro trays is becoming an innovative approach to producing quality seedlings in horticulture. The present investigation was conducted to evaluate the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Glomus bagyarajii and potassium (K) solubilizing bacterium Frateuria aurantia singly and together in enhancing the growth of capsicum seedlings raised in pro trays under polyhouse conditions. Different growth parameters such as shoot and root length, total seedling length, stem diameter, dry weight of seedlings, biovolume index, plant strength, vigour index, macro and micronutrient uptake, mycorrhizal root colonization, and the population of F. aurantia in the root zone soil were monitored. Significantly higher shoot length, root length, stem diameter, and biovolume index were recorded in the treatments inoculated with G. bagyarajii alone, followed by F. aurantia alone. Most of the plant growth parameters were significantly less in the dual inoculated treatment with G. bagyarajii + F. aurantia compared to single inoculation with either of them. This brings out the negative influence of the two inoculants on each other leading to a reduced effect on plant growth.

1. Introduction

Sustainable agriculture aims to maintain soil fertility for a long time and achieve optimized yield using low input [1]. It recommends reduced chemical fertilizer application and increased organic inputs for long-term crop production, which benefits the environment and reduces the cost of cultivation [2]. It also increases biodiversity by providing a healthy environment for the organisms to live [3]. Soil harbours a large population of microorganisms. The highest concentration of microbial population is around the roots, i.e., the rhizosphere region [4]. This is due particularly to the presence of sugars, amino acids, organic acids, etc., in the root exudates [5,6]. Microorganisms such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) colonize the rhizosphere to form a beneficial association with the root system of plants. This association aids plant growth by increasing its ability to take nutrients from the soil. Biofertilizers developed from microorganisms such as PGPR and AMF are less expensive and environmentally friendly compared to chemical fertilizers and pesticides and thus promoting sustainable agriculture [1,7,8,9].
AMF form a symbiotic association with nearly 80% of plants, and inoculation with AMF improving plant growth under phosphorus (P) deficient conditions is well documented [1]. They facilitate the uptake of diffusion-limited nutrients and protect the plants against biotic and abiotic stresses in exchange for photosynthates of the plant [10,11]. It also has synergistic interactions with other beneficial soil microorganisms, thereby enhancing plant growth [1]. PGPR are the rhizosphere bacteria that can enhance plant growth by a wide variety of mechanisms such as biological nitrogen fixation, phytohormone production, P, and potassium (K) solubilization, etc. [12].
Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB) viz. F. aurantia are PGPR which are effective in releasing potassium from potassium-bearing minerals through the production of organic acids such as tartaric acid, citric acid, succinic acid, α-ketogluconic acid, and oxalic acid, and thus solubilizing the insoluble potassium to soluble forms of potassium, which can be easily and readily taken up by the plants [13]. Usually, 90–98% of the total potassium in soil occurs in the form of mineral potassium, and most of this is unavailable for plant uptake [11]. K is an essential element required for plant growth. It is required to activate numerous enzymes involved in various processes such as sugar degradation, energy metabolism, and starch synthesis [14,15].
Capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.), also known as bell pepper or chilli pepper, belongs to the family Solanaceae. It is a popular vegetable crop which is native to the tropical and subtropical regions of America, and is presently cultivated all over the world. Capsicum is known for its high nutritional content. It is high in vitamins C, E, and A, a good range of minerals, phytochemicals, and dietary fibre, which play an important role in decreasing human micronutrient deficiencies [16,17]. The phytochemicals present in capsicum also have many industrial applications [18]. India contributes to one-fourth of the world’s production of capsicum, with an average annual production of 518,000 metric tons from an area of 24,000 ha, with a productivity of 1266 kg per ha [19]. Cultivation of capsicum is highly encouraged in peri-urban regions because of easy access to urban markets.
There are numerous methods for the application of beneficial microbes for improving plant growth [20]. The pro tray nursery is a recent technology widely gaining popularity for quality seedling production. Such seedlings have an independent area for each seedling; hence, improved seed germination, better root development, easy handling, cheaper transportation, and better establishment of the crop when transplanted in the main field [21,22]. The objective of the current work was to evaluate the effect of the AMF G. bagyarajii and the KSB F. aurantia inoculated singly and together on the growth of capsicum seedlings raised in pro trays under polyhouse conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

The polyhouse experiment was conducted at the Centre for Natural Biological Resources and Community Development (CNBRCD), Bangalore, India. The capsicum seeds of Arka Mohini, a F1 hybrid, commonly used by farmers in India, were obtained from the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bangalore, and used in the present study.

2.1. Inoculum Preparation

Pure culture of F. aurantia maintained at CNBRCD was used in the experiment. The culture was inoculated in a Glucose Yeast extract Calcium Carbonate (GYCC) broth and was incubated for 24 h. The culture suspension was centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min at 10,000 rpm and the centrifuged pellet was mixed in an appropriate amount of phosphate buffer. This culture buffer suspension was used as inoculum to inoculate seedlings in pro trays. The CFU of the KSB F. aurantia inoculum was determined by serial dilution and the spread plate method technique [23]. G. bagyarajii used in the study was maintained at CNBRCD culture collection in the polyhouse using Chloris gayana (Rhodes grass) as the host, using vermiculite, perlite, and soilrite as the substrate, in the ratio 3:1:1 (v/v/v). Seventy-five days after sowing, the shoots of Rhodes grass was harvested and the roots were cut into 1 cm length, mixed with the grown substrate and air-dried. This air-dried mixture was used as inoculum to inoculate in pro trays. The number of infective propagules of the inoculum was estimated through the most probable number (MPN) method [24].

2.2. Pro Tray Inoculation and Growth Condition

The capsicum seedlings were raised in one hundred cells of two pro trays (each with 50 cells) for each treatment holding 20 g substrate per cell. Each cell was filled with 18.5 g of the vermiculite, soilrite and perlite mixture, and 1.5 g of compost. The experiment had four treatments viz. T1—Uninoculated control; T2—Treated with KSB F. aurantia; T3—Treated with AMF G. bagyarajii, and T4—Treated with F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii. The experimental design used for the study was a randomized complete block design (RCBD). A depression was made in each cell and 0.8 g of the G. bagyarajii inoculum containing 7000 IP/g and/or 2 mL of F. aurantia containing 9 × 105 CFU/mL were added depending on the treatment. Uninoculated pro trays with no inoculation received autoclaved GYCC broth at the rate of 2 mL/cell, and washings of AMF inoculum suspension passed through a 45 µm sieve which contained associated microorganisms but not AMF propagules at the rate of 2 mL/cell. Two seeds were sown to each cell of the pro trays and thinned to one after germination. Ruakura nutrient solution (5 mL) with P [25] was applied to each cell on the tenth day after sowing, and thereafter 5 mL of the same nutrient solution without P was applied once in 7 days to all the cells. The plants were maintained in a polyhouse and watered regularly to maintain the optimum moisture status in the soil.

2.3. Parameters Evaluated

The seedlings were harvested 55 days after sowing (DAS). Various plant parameters such as shoot, root, seedling length, and stem diameter of the seedlings were measured. The biovolume index (BI) was calculated using the formula given by Hatchell et al. [26], and the seedling vigour index and plant strength were calculated using the standard formula [27,28].
B i o   v o l u m e   i n d e x = p l a n t   h e i g h t   c m × S t e m   g i r t h   m m
S e e d l i n g   v i g o u r = G e r m i n a t i o n   p e r c e n t a g e × s e e d l i n g   l e n g t h   c m
P l a n t   s t e n g t h = D r y   w e i g h t   o f   p l a n t   g H e i g h t   o f   p l a n t   c m
The dry weight of the seedlings was determined after drying in an oven at 60 °C to a constant weight. The dried seedlings were powdered, and the nitrogen (N) concentrations of the shoot and root were estimated following the micro-Kjeldahl method [29]. The phosphorus concentration was determined by the vanadomolybdate phosphoric yellow colour method [30]. The potassium concentration was estimated by the flame photometer method [31]. The micronutrient contents were determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer with a hollow cathode lamp set to standard wavelengths [32]. Roots were cut into 1 cm size, the root bits were stained using trypan blue as described by Philips and Hayman [33], and the per cent mycorrhizal root colonization was estimated by adopting the gridline intersect method [34]. The rhizosphere population of F. aurantia was enumerated by the standard dilution plating technique [35] using GYCC agar.
The results were analyzed using ANOVA with the help of the software Web Agri Stat Package 2.0 https://ccari.icar.gov.in/wasp2.0/index.php (accessed on 22 October 2022) and the means were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% level.

3. Results and Discussion

There was a significant increase in shoot and root length, stem diameter, and BI of capsicum seedlings treated with microbial inoculants compared to uninoculated seedlings (Figure 1). Shoot length was the highest in G. bagyarajii treated seedlings but statistically did not differ from F. aurantia treated seedlings. Seedlings inoculated with F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii had significantly lesser shoot and root length compared to seedlings inoculated singly with either of them. Uninoculated seedlings had the least shoot and root length. The BI followed a similar trend. Stem diameter was significantly higher in G. bagyarajii alone treatment followed by F. aurantia alone treatment. The least stem diameter was observed in seedlings inoculated with F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii and uninoculated seedlings both being statistically on par with each other (Table 1).
AMF enhancing plant growth is well known and documented [1,36,37]. The improved growth by AMF is mainly attributed to the uptake of diffusion-limited nutrients from soil. The other beneficial effects are their role in the biological control of root pathogens, phytohormone production, greater ability to withstand abiotic stress, and synergistic interaction with PGPR. Increased shoot length, root length, stem diameter, and BI in AMF-inoculated seedlings raised in pro trays has been reported earlier in other plants [36,37,38].
The seedling vigour index was significantly the highest in G. bagyarajii inoculated treatment, followed by seedlings inoculated with F. aurantia alone. The dry weight of seedlings was higher in G. bagyarajii inoculated treatment, followed by seedlings inoculated with F. aurantia alone and with F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii both not differing significantly (Table 2). Uninoculated seedlings had the lowest dry weight. Inoculation with AMF improving plant dry weight has been reported in many crop plants [37,38]. G. bagyarajii enhancing plant growth has also been reported [39,40]. The various mechanisms by which AMF help in increasing plant growth and dry weight have been explained in the earlier paragraph. K being one of the major nutrients required for plant growth is present in an unavailable form in soils. KSB are effective in releasing these K bound to minerals in the soil through the production of various acids solubilizing the insoluble K to soluble forms which are taken up by the plants [41,42]. Inoculation with KSB improving the dry weight of several other plants has also been reported earlier [42,43]. In the present study, the differences in plant strength because of inoculation were not statistically significant (Table 2).
Regarding N concentration of seedlings, the maximum concentration was encountered in G. bagyarajii alone treatment, followed by F. aurantia alone treatment, followed by F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii treatment, with all three differing significantly. The least N concentration was recorded in uninoculated seedlings. The P concentration was highest in G. bagyarajii inoculated seedlings, followed by F. aurantia alone, and F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii inoculated seedlings, both being statistically on par, and the least P concentration was observed in uninoculated seedlings. P is a diffusion-limited nutrient. So, its uptake depends on the movement of these ions to the root surface and then the absorbing capacity of the root [44]. Increased uptake in G. bagyarajii inoculated seedlings is in conformity with earlier reports made on other plants [36,37]. K concentration was significantly higher in F. aurantia treatment, followed by G. bagyarajii alone, and F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii and uninoculated treatment, with all four treatments differing significantly from each other. The differences in the Ca and Mg concentrations in the different treatments were not statistically significant (Table 3).
The concentration of the micronutrients Zn, Mg, B, Mo, and Fe were highest in G. bagyarajii inoculated seedlings, followed by F. aurantia treatment, followed by F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii treatment, followed by uninoculated treatment, with all the treatments differing significantly from each other. The concentration of Cu was the highest in G. bagyarajii treatment, followed by F. aurantia treatment, with both not differing statistically. Seedlings dually inoculated with F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii had significantly less micronutrient uptake compared to seedlings singly inoculated. Higher uptake of micronutrients like Zn, B, Mo, and Fe in capsicum seedlings inoculated with AM fungi upholds the observations made earlier on other plants [45]. KSB improving K and micronutrient uptake has also been reported [41,42,43]. Dual inoculation of AMF + PGPR, such as N-fixers and P-solubilizers enhancing the uptake of micronutrients has been reported in many plants [38,44,45]. But in the present study, dual inoculation with F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii resulted in a reduced uptake of Zn, B, Mn, Fe, and Cu (Table 4). Though it is strange, it agrees with the observations made on tomatoes with dual inoculation with the AMF Funneliformis mosseae and the KSB Bacillus mucilaginosus [43].
The per cent mycorrhizal root colonization was significantly higher in G. bagyarajii alone and F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii treatments, with both being statistically on par, followed by F. aurantia alone treatment (Table 5). Uninoculated seedlings had the least mycorrhizal root colonization. Significantly higher mycorrhizal root colonization in G. bagyarajii alone and F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii treatments compared to uninoculated plants indicate the better proliferating ability of G. bagyarajii with capsicum as the host [45]. The highest CFU of F. aurantia was recorded in F. aurantia alone treatment followed by F. aurantia + G. bagyarajii treatment, with both differing significantly. F. aurantia colonies could not be encountered in uninoculated and G. bagyarajii alone inoculated treatments. Higher CFU of F. aurantia in the root zone of capsicum inoculated with this KSB brings out the ability of the bacterium to establish in the rhizosphere.
Significantly lower plant growth, dry weight, seedling vigour, and macro and micro-nutrients uptake in dual inoculated treatment revealed the negative interaction between the two inoculants. Earlier, Walker et al. [46] reported that the co-inoculated treatments involving Glomus + Azospirillum + Pseudomonas did not show positive effects on maize seedlings compared to their single inoculation. The result of the present study brings out that the AMF G. bagyarajii and KSB F. aurantia are not compatible. Another recent study also reported incompatibility between the AMF F. mosseae and the KSB B. mucilaginosus [40]. This suggests warranting more investigations between different AMF and KSB to uphold such negative interaction.

4. Conclusions

The synergistic interaction between AMF and PGPR is well documented. The result of the present study brings out that single inoculation with the AMF G. bagyarajii or the KSB F. aurantia promoted better plant growth compared to dual inoculation with both organisms. This brings out the negative effect of the two inoculants on each other, leading to a reduced effect on plant growth. Negative interaction between AMF and PGPR is rare and unusual. Detailed studies are required to understand the mechanisms involved in such negative interaction.

Author Contributions

Investigation, V.B.S.; Methodology, V.B.S., P.R. and R.A.; Supervision, R.A. and J.D.B.; Writing—original draft, V.B.S. and P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bagyaraj, D.J. Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture, Horticulture & Forestry; New India Publishing Agency: New Delhi, India, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Altieri, M.A. Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kuila, D.; Ghosh, S. Aspects, problems and utilization of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) application as bio-fertilizer in sustainable agriculture. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 100107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schoenborn, L.; Yates, P.S.; Grinton, B.E.; Hugenholtz, P.; Janssen, P.H. Liquid serial dilution is inferior to solid media for isolation of cultures representative of the phylum-level diversity of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4363–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Badri, D.V.; Weir, T.L.; Van der Lelie, D.; Vivanco, J.M. Rhizosphere chemical dialogues: Plant–microbe interactions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Badri, D.V.; Vivanco, J.M. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 666–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Igiehon, N.O.; Babalola, O.O.; Cheseto, X.; Torto, B. Effects of rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on yield, size distribution and fatty acid of soybean seeds grown under drought stress. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Laranjeira, S.; Reis, S.; Torcato, C.; Raimundo, F.; Ferreira, L.; Carnide, V.; Fernandes-Silva, A.; Marques, G. Use of plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria and mycorrhizal fungi consortium as a strategy to improve chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) productivity under different irrigation regimes. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chandini, P.; Ashwin, R.; Bagyaraj, D.J. Dual inoculation with AMF Funneliformis mosseae and PGPR Bacillus sonorensis enhances growth of brinjal seedlings raised in pro trays. Kavaka 2022, 58, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh, J.; Aneja, K.R. From Ethnomycology to Fungal Biotechnology: Exploiting Fungi from Natural Resources for Novel Products; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Harley, J.L. The significance of mycorrhiza. Mycol. Res. 1989, 92, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; El Enshasy, H. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: Recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, X.; Chen, J.; Guo, J. Two phosphate-and potassium-solubilizing bacteria isolated from Tianmu Mountain, Zhejiang, China. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 983–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Almeida, H.J.; Pancelli, M.A.; Prado, R.M.; Cavalcante, V.S.; Cruz, F.J.R. Effect of potassium on nutritional status and productivity of peanuts in succession with sugarcane. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sindhu, S.S.; Parmar, P.; Phour, M.; Sehrawat, A. Potassium-Solubilizing Microorganisms (KSMs) and its Effect on Plant Growth Improvement. In Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms For Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 171–185. [Google Scholar]
  16. Olatunji, T.L.; Afolayan, A.J. Comparison of nutritional, antioxidant vitamins and capsaicin contents in Capsicum annuum and C. frutescens. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2020, 26, 190–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Preciado-Rangel, P.; Andrade-Sifuentes, A.; Sanchez-Chavez, E.; Salas-Perez, L.; Fortis-Hernandez, M.; Rueda-Puente, E.O.; Garcia-Hernandez, J.L. Potassium influence the nutraceutical and antioxidant content of Serrano hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Agrociencia 2019, 53, 581–591. [Google Scholar]
  18. Baenas, N.; Belović, M.; Ilic, N.; Moreno, D.A.; García-Viguera, C. Industrial use of pepper (Capsicum annum L.) derived products: Technological benefits and biological advantages. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 872–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. National Horticulture Board, Department of Agriculture Cooporation & Farmers Welfare. 2022. Available online: https://nhb.gov.in/Statistics.aspx?enc=i3aXhtkJwc/n3rCHOr1FVp4BttTNWlLSQ8DhVptPrAbUppswYCodsFDUK1EY4Ru6yxB1yyjqgJ6NwxLqpANwXQ== (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  20. Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012, 963401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bisen, K.; Keswani, C.; Mishra, S.; Saxena, A.; Rakshit, A.; Singh, H.B. Unrealized Potential of Seed Biopriming for Versatile Agriculture. In Nutrient Use Efficiency: From Basics to Advances; Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B., Sen, A., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 193–206. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahmood, A.; Turgay, O.C.; Farooq, M.; Hayat, R. Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ben-David, A.; Davidson, C.E. Estimation method for serial dilution experiments. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 107, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bagyaraj, D.J.; Sturmer, S.L. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF). In A handbook of Tropical Soil Biology: Sampling and Characterization of Belowground Biodiversity; Moreira, F.M.S., Huising, J.E., Bignell, D.E., Eds.; Earthscan Pub: London, UK, 2008; pp. 131–147. [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, G.S.; Johnston, C.M.; Cornforth, I.S. Comparison of nutrient solutions for growth of plants in sand culture. New Phytol. 1983, 94, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hatchell, G.E.; Berry, C.R.; Muse, H.D. Nondestructive indices related to aboveground biomass of young loblolly and sand pines on ectomycorrhizal and fertilizer plots. For. Sci. 1985, 31, 419–427. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abdul-Baki, A.A.; Anderson, J.D. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 1973, 13, 630–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maskina, M.S.; Meelu, O.P.; Roberts, D.L. Effect of organic and inorganic manuring on rice nurseries. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 1984, 9, 265–275. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kjeldahl, J.G. Neue methode zur bestimmung des stickstoffs in organischen körpern. Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem. 1883, 22, 366–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jackson, M.L. Soil Chemical Analysis; Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  31. Barnes, R.B.; Richardson, D.; Berry, J.W.; Hood, R.L. Flame photometry a rapid analytical procedure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 1945, 17, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aggarwal, M. Experiment-32 Determination of Copper, Zinc, Lead and Cadmium in Food Products by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy; IGNOU: New Delhi, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  33. Philips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques to measure vesicular arbuscular infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980, 84, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Johnson, L.F.; Curl, E.A. Methods for Research on the Ecology of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens; Burgess Publishing Co.: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gracy, L.S.; Bagyaraj, D.J. Influence of Glomus bagyarajii and PGPRs on the growth, nutrition and forskolin concentration of Coleus forskohlii. Biol. Agric. Hort. 2006, 23, 371–381. [Google Scholar]
  37. Raghavendra Kumar, M.; Ashwin, R.; Bagyaraj, D.J. Screening arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in order to select the best for alleviating wilt disease complex of capsicum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Sec. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 88, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Praveen, R.; Anuroopa, N.; Ashwin, R.; Bagyaraj, D.J. Symbiotic response of fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and field bean (Lablab purpureus L.) with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Kavaka 2022, 58, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  39. Navdeep, S.; Daljeet, S.; Narinder, S. Effect of Glomus bagyarajii inoculation and phosphorus amendments on Fusarial wilt of chickpea. Agric. Esearch J. 2017, 54, 236–243. [Google Scholar]
  40. Buttar, D.S.; Singh, N.; Singh, N. Impact of phosphorus amendments on colonization and spore population of Glomus bagyarajii (AM fungi) in chickpea. Plant Disease Res. 2016, 31, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  41. Etesami, H.; Emami, S.; Alikhani, H.A. Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): Mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects A review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 17, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Meena, V.S.; Maurya, B.R.; Verma, J.P.; Meena, R.S. (Eds.) Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; p. 331. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jenifer Sheeba, J.; Ranadev, P.; Ashwin, R.; Bagyaraj, D.J. Influence of AM fungus Funneliformis mosseae and K solubilizing bacterium Bacillus mucilaginosus on the growth of tomato seedlings raised in pro trays. J. Microbes Res. 2022, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bagyaraj, D.J.; Sharma, M.P.; Maiti, D. Phosphorus nutrition of crops through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Curr. Sci. 2015, 108, 1288–1293. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sukeerthi, D.; Nikhil, N.; Ashwin, R.; Bagyaraj, D.J. Microbial consortium promotes growth of zinnia and balsam seedlings raised in pro trays. J. Floric. Landscaping 2020, 6, 04–08. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Walker, V.; Couillerot, O.; Von Felten, A.; Bellvert, F.; Jansa, J.; Maurhofer, M.; Bally, R.; Moënne-Loccoz, Y.; Comte, G. Variation of secondary metabolite levels in maize seedling roots induced by inoculation with Azospirillum, Pseudomonas and Glomus consortium under field conditions. Plant Soil 2012, 356, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Influence of microbial inoculants on growth of capsicum seedlings raised in pro trays 55 days after sowing. (T1: Uninoculated control; T2: Inoculated with Frateuria aurantia (Fa); T3: Inoculated with Glomus bagyarajii (Gb); T4: Inoculated with Fa + Gb).
Figure 1. Influence of microbial inoculants on growth of capsicum seedlings raised in pro trays 55 days after sowing. (T1: Uninoculated control; T2: Inoculated with Frateuria aurantia (Fa); T3: Inoculated with Glomus bagyarajii (Gb); T4: Inoculated with Fa + Gb).
Seeds 01 00026 g001
Table 1. Influence of the microbial inoculants on shoot length, stem diameter, root length, and biovolume index of capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
Table 1. Influence of the microbial inoculants on shoot length, stem diameter, root length, and biovolume index of capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
TreatmentsShoot Length (cm)Stem Diameter (mm)Root Length (cm)Biovolume Index
Uninoculated control17.24 ± 1.22 c2.64 ± 0.19 c10.81 ± 0.76 c45.51 ± 3.22 c
Inoculated with Frateuria aurantia (Fa)19.8 ± 1.40 ab2.82 ± 0.20 b13.65 ± 0.97 ab55.84 ± 3.95 a
Inoculated with Glomus bagyarajii (Gb)20.46 ± 1.45 a3.01 ± 0.21 a14.38 ± 1.02 a61.58 ± 4.35 ab
Inoculated with Fa + Gb19.35 ± 1.37 b2.64 ± 0.19 c12.75 ± 0.90 b51.08 ± 3.61 b
SEd0.470.050.670.94
LSD (0.05)0.930.111.361.86
Means in the column with same alphabets are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 2. Influence of the microbial inoculants on seed vigour, plant strength, fresh weight, and dry weight of capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
Table 2. Influence of the microbial inoculants on seed vigour, plant strength, fresh weight, and dry weight of capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
TreatmentsSeeding Vigour IndexPlant Strength/SeedlingFresh Weight/Seedling (g)Dry Weight/Seedling (g)
Uninoculated control2167 ± 153.2 d0.022.81 ± 0.20 b0.46 ± 0.03 c
Inoculated with Frateuria aurantia (Fa)2585 ± 182.8 b0.023.21 ± 0.23 ab0.52 ± 0.04 b
Inoculated with Glomus bagyarajii (Gb)2692 ± 190.3 a0.023.68 ± 0.24 a0.55 ± 0.04 a
Inoculated with Fa + Gb2481 ± 175.4 c0.023.29 ± 0.21 a0.50 ± 0.04 b
SEd0.046NS0.260.003
LSD (0.05)8.510.530.007
Means in the column with same alphabets are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05; NS-Not significant.
Table 3. Influence of microbial inoculants on uptake of macronutrients (%) by capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
Table 3. Influence of microbial inoculants on uptake of macronutrients (%) by capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
TreatmentsNitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumCalciumMagnesium
Uninoculated control3.01 ± 0.21 d0.66 ± 0.05 c4.22 ± 0.30 d0.780.33
Inoculated with Frateuria aurantia (Fa)3.47 ± 0.25 b0.72 ± 0.05 b4.57 ± 0.32 a0.830.37
Inoculated with Glomus bagyarajii (Gb)3.82 ± 0.27 a0.83 ± 0.06 a4.45 ± 0.31 b0.880.34
Inoculated with Fa + Gb3.33 ± 0.24 c0.72 ± 0.05 b4.42 ± 0.31 c0.810.40
SEd0.0070.0090.009NSNS
LSD (0.05)0.0180.020.02
Means in the column with same alphabets are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. NS-Not significant.
Table 4. Influence of microbial inoculants on uptake of micronutrients (ppm) by capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
Table 4. Influence of microbial inoculants on uptake of micronutrients (ppm) by capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
TreatmentsZincCopperManganeseBoronMolybdenumIron
Uninoculated control51.78 ± 3.7 d16.84 ± 1.19 c47.47 ± 3.36 c36.69 ± 2.6 d67.45 ± 4.8 d2622 ± 185.4 d
Inoculated with Frateuria aurantia (Fa)54.68 ± 3.9 b18.56 ± 1.31 a53.49 ± 3.37 b41.89 ± 3.0 b73.55 ± 5.2 b2922 ± 206.6 b
Inoculated with Glomus bagyarajii (Gb)56.97 ± 4.0 a18.84 ± 1.33 a56.68 ± 4.01 a46.40 ± 3.3 a86.27 ± 6.1 a3468 ± 245.2 a
Inoculated with Fa + Gb53.23 ± 3.8 c17.24 ± 1.22 b53.76 ± 3.80 b38.86 ± 2.8 c69.66 ± 5.0 c2717 ± 192.1 c
SEd0.170.120.140.200.2013.23
LSD (0.05)0.40.290.330.40.4830.53
Means in the column with same alphabets are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 5. Influence of the microbial inoculants on the percent mycorrhizal colonization of Glomus bagyarajii and microbial load of Frateuria aurantia in rhizosphere of capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
Table 5. Influence of the microbial inoculants on the percent mycorrhizal colonization of Glomus bagyarajii and microbial load of Frateuria aurantia in rhizosphere of capsicum seedlings grown in pro trays 55 days after sowing.
TreatmentsPercent Mycorrhizal Colonization (%)Bacterial CFU (×105 per mL)
Uninoculated control20 ± 1.41 c0 ± 0.35 c
Inoculated with Frateuria aurantia (Fa)30 ± 2.12 b16 ± 1.33 a
Inoculated with Glomus bagyarajii (Gb)96 ± 6.79 a0 ± 0.35 c
Inoculated with Fa + Gb94 ± 6.65 a5 ± 0.35 b
SEd3.50.3
LSD (0.05)7.40.6
Means in the column with same alphabets are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spoorthi, V.B.; Ranadev, P.; Ashwin, R.; Bagyaraj, J.D. Response of Capsicum annuum L. Seedlings Raised in Pro Trays to Inoculation with AM Fungus Glomus bagyarajii and K Solubilizing Bacterium Frateuria aurantia. Seeds 2022, 1, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds1040026

AMA Style

Spoorthi VB, Ranadev P, Ashwin R, Bagyaraj JD. Response of Capsicum annuum L. Seedlings Raised in Pro Trays to Inoculation with AM Fungus Glomus bagyarajii and K Solubilizing Bacterium Frateuria aurantia. Seeds. 2022; 1(4):315-323. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds1040026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spoorthi, Vijaykumar B., Praveen Ranadev, Revanna Ashwin, and Joseph D. Bagyaraj. 2022. "Response of Capsicum annuum L. Seedlings Raised in Pro Trays to Inoculation with AM Fungus Glomus bagyarajii and K Solubilizing Bacterium Frateuria aurantia" Seeds 1, no. 4: 315-323. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds1040026

APA Style

Spoorthi, V. B., Ranadev, P., Ashwin, R., & Bagyaraj, J. D. (2022). Response of Capsicum annuum L. Seedlings Raised in Pro Trays to Inoculation with AM Fungus Glomus bagyarajii and K Solubilizing Bacterium Frateuria aurantia. Seeds, 1(4), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds1040026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop