Next Article in Journal
Food Frequency Questionnaire: Is It Time for a Re-Vamp? A Kaupapa Māori Critique of Dietary Recall and Assessment Tools
Previous Article in Journal
Relationships among Student-Athletes’ Identity and Mental Health Condition—Survey in the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

BIA-Sustainability: Development of A Business Impact Assessment of Food Companies †

1
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, 1023 Auckland, New Zealand
2
Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong 3125, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Nutrition Society of New Zealand Annual Conference, Online, 2–3 December 2021.
Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 9(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022009001
Published: 13 April 2022

Abstract

:
Unsustainable food systems are responsible for unhealthy diets and significant environmental degradation globally. The environmental impact of food companies extends along the food supply chain. The International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) is a global research network that aims to monitor, benchmark and support public and private sector actions to reduce obesity and non-communicable diseases. The Business Impact Assessment on Obesity and Population Nutrition (BIA-Obesity) tool for monitoring the nutrition commitments of food manufacturers, retailers and quick-service restaurants has been successfully used in various countries. This research aims to develop a companion tool to monitor the commitments of food companies to sustainability and verify the relevance and feasibility of the proposed indicators with experts. An inventory of existing indicators was created to guide the creation of domains and indicators. The eleven proposed domains were: packaging, energy use, emissions, water and discharge, biodiversity, climate change adaptation, food loss and waste, environmental compliance, relationships with other organisations, corporate sustainability strategy and reducing ruminant-based products. The Global Reporting Initiative is the most widely used sustainability reporting framework, so selected indicators were modified, and additional indicators and a scoring system were added. Feedback was provided from six academic experts in New Zealand and Australia, sustainability managers from three major food companies in New Zealand and from the INFORMAS Food Sustainability Advisory team (international sustainability experts). In each feedback step, the indicators were modified to improve the specificity of commitments, clarify definitions, add or remove indicators and to modify the scoring of indicators. Feedback highlighted the complexity for food companies in setting commitments, how to incorporate the supply chain into the indicators, how to focus on priority areas of environmental impact for an individual company, and challenges in developing indicators for biodiversity. The resulting 35 indicators will be piloted in selected countries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M., G.S. (Gary Sacks); methodology, S.M., G.S. (Gary Sacks), A.R.-D., E.R.; data collection and analysis, A.R.-D., G.S. (Grace Shaw), S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.-D., S.M.; writing—review and editing, S.M., G.S. (Gary Sacks), A.R.-D., E.R., G.S. (Grace Shaw). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a University of Auckland new staff grant 3720346.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Ethical consent was gained for the interviews from The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee on 8 June 2020 (024751).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mackay, S.; Renker-Darby, A.; Robinson, E.; Shaw, G.; Sacks, G. BIA-Sustainability: Development of A Business Impact Assessment of Food Companies. Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022009001

AMA Style

Mackay S, Renker-Darby A, Robinson E, Shaw G, Sacks G. BIA-Sustainability: Development of A Business Impact Assessment of Food Companies. Medical Sciences Forum. 2022; 9(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022009001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mackay, Sally, Ana Renker-Darby, Ella Robinson, Grace Shaw, and Gary Sacks. 2022. "BIA-Sustainability: Development of A Business Impact Assessment of Food Companies" Medical Sciences Forum 9, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022009001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop