Precision of Tooth Size Measurement in Digital Models Acquired by Intraoral Scanning and by Scanning of Plaster Models Versus Conventionally Cast Models †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Quimby, M.L.; Vig, K.W.; Rashid, R.G.; Firestone, A.R. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004, 74, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Leifert, M.F.; Leifert, M.M.; Efstratiadis, S.S.; Cangialosi, T.J. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 136, e1–e4; discussion 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naidu, D.; Scott, J.; Ong, D.; Ho, C.T. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses. Aust. Orthod. J. 2009, 25, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sousa, M.V.; Vasconcelos, E.C.; Janson, G.; Garib, D.; Pinzan, A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2012, 142, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flügge, T.V.; Schlager, S.; Nelson, K.; Nahles, S.; Metzger, M.C. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2013, 144, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Lagravére, M.O. Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images. Korean J. Orthod. 2016, 46, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pellitteri, F.; Albertini, P.; Vogrig, A.; Spedicato, G.A.; Siciliani, G.; Lombardo, L. Comparative analysis of intraoral scanners accuracy using 3D software: An in vivo study. Prog. Orthod. 2022, 23, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naidu, D.; Freer, T.J. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2013, 144, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camardella, L.T.; Ongkosuwito, E.M.; Penning, E.W.; Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M.; Vilella, O.V.; Breuning, K.H. Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners. Korean J. Orthod. 2020, 50, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajeer, M.Y.; Millett, D.T.; Ayoub, A.F.; Siebert, J.P. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: Part I. J. Orthod. 2004, 31, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moon, Y.G.; Lee, K.M. Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan. Prog. Orthod. 2020, 21, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Digital Calliper/Plaster Model | Nemocast/Intraoral Scan | Nemocast/Plaster Scan | Mean | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Upper Arch | ||||
16 | 0.908 | 0.693 | 0.685 | 0.762 |
15 | 0.972 | 0.935 | 0.909 | 0.939 |
14 | 0.951 | 0.915 | 0.804 | 0.890 |
13 | 0.630 | 0.943 | 0.840 | 0.804 |
12 | 0.931 | 0.930 | 0.962 | 0.941 |
11 | 0.990 | 0.944 | 0.935 | 0.956 |
21 | 0.969 | 0.965 | 0.971 | 0.968 |
22 | 0.974 | 0.864 | 0.957 | 0.932 |
23 | 0.927 | 0.900 | 0.490 | 0.772 |
24 | 0.961 | 0.941 | 0.942 | 0.948 |
25 | 0.933 | 0.853 | 0.648 | 0.811 |
26 | 0.847 | 0.665 | 0.281 | 0.598 |
Lower Arch | ||||
36 | 0.989 | 0.947 | 0.914 | 0.950 |
35 | 0.979 | 0.912 | 0.835 | 0.909 |
34 | 0.890 | 0.915 | 0.961 | 0.922 |
33 | 0.904 | 0.867 | 0.902 | 0.891 |
32 | 0.895 | 0.965 | 0.961 | 0.940 |
31 | 0.905 | 0.524 | 0.861 | 0.763 |
41 | 0.919 | 0.937 | 0.968 | 0.941 |
42 | 0.878 | 0.932 | 0.965 | 0.925 |
43 | 0.915 | 0.952 | 0.900 | 0.922 |
44 | 0.932 | 0.921 | 0.915 | 0.923 |
45 | 0.967 | 0.927 | 0.955 | 0.950 |
46 | 0.931 | 0.888 | 0.949 | 0.923 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jardim, M.; Mariano Pereira, P.; Proença, L.; Bugaighis, I. Precision of Tooth Size Measurement in Digital Models Acquired by Intraoral Scanning and by Scanning of Plaster Models Versus Conventionally Cast Models. Med. Sci. Forum 2023, 22, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023022020
Jardim M, Mariano Pereira P, Proença L, Bugaighis I. Precision of Tooth Size Measurement in Digital Models Acquired by Intraoral Scanning and by Scanning of Plaster Models Versus Conventionally Cast Models. Medical Sciences Forum. 2023; 22(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023022020
Chicago/Turabian StyleJardim, Matilde, Pedro Mariano Pereira, Luís Proença, and Iman Bugaighis. 2023. "Precision of Tooth Size Measurement in Digital Models Acquired by Intraoral Scanning and by Scanning of Plaster Models Versus Conventionally Cast Models" Medical Sciences Forum 22, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023022020
APA StyleJardim, M., Mariano Pereira, P., Proença, L., & Bugaighis, I. (2023). Precision of Tooth Size Measurement in Digital Models Acquired by Intraoral Scanning and by Scanning of Plaster Models Versus Conventionally Cast Models. Medical Sciences Forum, 22(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023022020