Statement of Peer Review †
- Type of peer review: single-blind.
- Conference submission management system: email.
- Number of submissions sent for review: 9 (ESPAUR 2021/22 Webinar); 60 (Antibiotic Guardian Awards).
- Number of submissions accepted: 8 (ESPAUR 2021/22 Webinar); 12 (Antibiotic Guardian Awards).
- Number of submissions published: 8 (ESPAUR 2021/22 Webinar); 12 (Antibiotic Guardian Awards).
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 88.9% (ESPAUR 2021/22 Webinar); 20% (Antibiotic Guardian Awards).
- Average number of reviews per paper: 1 (ESPAUR 2021/22 Webinar); 3.5 (Antibiotic Guardian Awards).
- Total number of reviewers involved: 6 (ESPAUR 2021/22 Webinar); 33 (Antibiotic Guardian Awards).
- Any additional information on the review process can be found below.
1. ESPAUR Report Webinar and Antibiotic Guardian Shared Learning Events
2. Antibiotic Guardian Shared Learning & Awards Event (AGSLA)
Shortlisting/Judging Panel (Peer Reviewers)
Conflicts of Interest
Award Category | Number of Judges/Reviewers | Number of Entries | Number Shortlisted |
---|---|---|---|
Animal Health | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Children & Family | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Community Communications | 3 | 5 | 3 |
COVID-19 Learning | 5 | 3 | 3 |
Diagnostic Stewardship | 4 | 3 | 2 |
Innovation & technology | 3 | 6 | 3 |
Multi-country collaboration | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Prescribing & stewardship | 7 | 18 | 3 |
Public Engagement | 4 | 7 | 5 |
Research | 3 | 5 | 3 |
Das Pillay Antimicrobial Stewardship Memorial Award | 4 | 5 | 3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ashiru-Oredope, D.; Triggs-Hodge, C.; Charlesworth, J. Statement of Peer Review. Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 15, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022015021
Ashiru-Oredope D, Triggs-Hodge C, Charlesworth J. Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum. 2022; 15(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022015021
Chicago/Turabian StyleAshiru-Oredope, Diane, Carry Triggs-Hodge, and Jordan Charlesworth. 2022. "Statement of Peer Review" Medical Sciences Forum 15, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022015021
APA StyleAshiru-Oredope, D., Triggs-Hodge, C., & Charlesworth, J. (2022). Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum, 15(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022015021