Next Article in Journal
ESSνSB from Source to Target and Plans for the Future
Previous Article in Journal
JUNO Status and Physics Potential
 
 
Proceeding Paper
Peer-Review Record

Measurement of Double-Differential Cross-Sections for Mesonless Charged Current Neutrino Scattering on Argon with MicroBooNE

Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008033
by Julia Book on behalf of the MicroBooNE Collaboration
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008033
Published: 8 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I suggest the following:

1) line90: Please provide a weblink or cite the paper also for reference nb [5] as done for the others

2) line 25: "scatters of" should be "neutrino scatters off the argon nucleus"

3) line36: instead of "two events selections", "two event categories"

4) line36-40: it is confusing, it sould be rephrased. In the introduction it is stated that the results presented refer to single-differential event rate for CC0piNp and double-differential cross-section for CC0pi1p events

5)line56-57: Was it supposed to be "The kinematic properties of these final state particles are affected by nuclear and initial state effects including final state interactions (FSI)"? Probably better: "The kinematic properties of these final state particles are affected by nuclear initial state effects, including also final state interactions (FSI)"

6)line60: "angles" instead of "angle"

7)line67: "transverse variables delta ALPHA T", the alpha is missing

8)line74-76: It should be rephrased, I suggest for example "In this regard, the transverse variable cross sections (figure 4), strongly disfavoring the no FSI hypothesis, start pointing to areas where modeling improvements are needed"

Author Response

Please see attachments

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The proceedings are well-written and I support publication in the present form

Author Response

No revisions required. Thank you for your feedback!

Back to TopTop