Abstract
Expanding populations and limited natural resources are leading to demands for alternative dietary proteins. The world food supply needs to be increased to feed the increasing population with the same limited resources. To overcome the hunger problem, alternative protein sources such as fungal “Mycelium” can be regarded as a novel, sustainable and safe dietary protein to support health with limited resources (water, land) and with a lower carbon footprint. Although, mycelium is rich in various minerals, vitamin D2, fibers, essential amino acids along with protein, its storage life is relatively short due to its high moisture content (89% wb). Thus, drying of mycelium would facilitate shelf-life enhancement for further processing. Moving in this direction, cold pressing as a pre-processing step was conducted to reduce the initial moisture of mycelium so as to reduce the drying time and cost by a significant amount. Then, the influence of different drying techniques such as vacuum (VD), microwave (MWD) and freeze (FD) drying methods on quality attributes such as color, microstructure (SEM), water solubility index, water absorption index, bulk and tapped density, and flowability of Pleurotus eryngii was determined. Pressing at 5 N for 30 s reduced drying time by approximately 50–55%. FD was the most effective which retained the main characteristics of P. eryngii followed by VD and MWD. SEM analysis showed that FD sample contains porous fibrous structure, whereas MWD and VD samples contain a hard structure with less or no pores. Finally, despite having the shortest drying time, MWD and VD damages the structure of P. eryngii, whereas nutrient loss is not significant in all the drying processes.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/Foods2021-10950/s1, Poster: Effect of different drying methods on quality attributes and microstructure of mycelium (Pleurotus eryngii).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.N.M. and S.M.; methodology, S.M. and H.N.M.; software, S.M.; validation, S.M.; formal analysis, S.M.; investigation, H.N.M. and S.M.; resources, H.N.M.; data curation, S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. and H.N.M.; writing—review and editing, H.N.M. and S.M.; visualization, H.N.M.; supervision, H.N.M.; project administration, H.N.M.; funding acquisition, H.N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Ministry of Food Processing Industries (MoFPI), GOI, grant number “F. No. Q-11/9/2018-R&D dated 17 December 2018”.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Prime Minister Research Fellowship (PMRF) for providing fellowship during the research and Food Chemistry and Technology Laboratory, IIT Kharagpur for instrumental facility.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).