Next Article in Journal
Dissecting Plant Specific Insert Interaction Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Metformin on Antioxidative Response of Lactuca sativa Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum Type Influences Phosphorus Subcellular Distribution in Shoots of Wheat Grown in Acidic Soil under Sustainable Agricultural Practices †

1
INIAV, I.P., National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
2
MED, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Évora University, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
3
HERCULES Laboratory, Évora University, Largo Marquês de Marialva 8, 7000-809 Évora, Portugal
4
Science and Technology School, Évora University, Rua Romão Ramalho 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2020; Available online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4(1), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08596
Published: 30 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science)

Abstract

:
Crop growth in acidic soils is limited by toxicity of Al and/or Mn and deficiency of phosphorus (P). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improve host water and nutrient acquisition, particularly P. When colonization is initiated from an intact extraradical mycelium (ERM), shoot P levels increase, depending on the plant species associated with ERM development (Developer). In the present study, wheat (Triticum aestivum) was grown in an acidic soil with intact ERM associated with previously grown native stress-adapted Developers. Non-mycotrophic Silene gallica (SIL) was compared with strongly mycotrophic Lolium rigidum L. (LOL) and Ornithopus compressus (ORN). After 3 weeks, wheat shoot P concentration and subcellular redistribution were analyzed via ICP-MS. ERMs established after LOL or ORN growth promoted 1.7- and 1.6-fold wheat shoot P accumulation, respectively. Shoots of wheat grown after SIL showed 40% of P in the apoplast, while after LOL or ORN, this proportion was approx. 50%. Intact ERM from mycotrophic Developers adapted to acidic soils seems to influence crop growth by increasing P uptake and managing its subcellular distribution. This knowledge is important for the development of sustainable agricultural practices in the framework of net carbon zero-emission agriculture.

1. Introduction

Soil acidity is a worldwide problem for 40% of modern agricultural soils and more than 60% of potentially arable lands, particularly in the tropic and subtropic regions [1,2]. The increase in soil H+ leads to changes in the chemical and biochemical properties of soil that hinder plant development and survival. Acidity promotes the release of aluminum (Al), iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) from their soil-bound forms into plant bioavailable Al3+, Fe2+ and Mn2+, which can reach toxic levels depending on soil and environmental conditions [3,4]. Simultaneously, acidity can lead to a decline in soil fertility by promoting a decrease in solubility of phosphorus (P) and molybdenum (Mo) and deficiencies in plant-essential nutrients, such as magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca) and potassium (K) [5,6]. Erosion, extensive soil use, misapplication of ammonium-based fertilizers and natural waterlogging events can amplify the negative effects of soil acidity in agricultural soils [7,8,9,10]. Excess metals/metalloids in soil can be an aggravating factor for plant growth and yield, through the displacement of essential elements and consequent disruption of metabolic processes, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation [9]. To decrease toxicity symptoms in crops, soil amendments are generally used. The application of lime and/or dolomitic lime (Ca and Mg carbonates or oxides) can raise soil pH and improve plant nutrition by supplementing Ca and Mg. Nevertheless, lime is seldomly used in the required amounts, greatly increasing farming costs, and can be hampered by the soil’s strong buffering capacity, depending on soil characteristics [10]. More importantly, while liming improves plant P levels by decreasing the uptake of toxic ions, it has been associated with reduced P in the soil solution and plant shoot [11]. Liming and extensive P fertilization are not sustainable practices for intensive farming.
The intentional use of beneficial plant microbes, particularly arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), the most spread and oldest mutualistic association between plants and soil microbes (up to 80% of plants species), has the potential to buffer metal toxicity and increase plant productivity [12,13,14,15]. Plant hosts benefit from increased uptake of water and immobile soil nutrients, such as P, (due to the increase in uptake surface area), while the fungus receives photosynthates and other essential compounds from the plant. AMF symbiosis provides several other advantages to the plant host, such as the shaping of soil properties, texture and fertility (particularly soil organic matter); protection against abiotic and biotic stresses; and, in particular, protection against metal/metalloid toxicity [16]. In soils showing toxicity, native symbiotic microbiota is generally adapted to extreme environments, showing increased tolerance [17,18,19,20]. In these systems, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) play pivotal roles in plant survival [21,22,23]. Nonetheless, AMF have been scarcely used on extensive cropping systems due to the high cost and limited biodiversity of commercial inocula, together with the timeliness of colonization to achieve benefits. The use of pre-established extraradical mycelium (ERM) for crop growth improvement offers the advantage of an earlier and faster colonization [24]. In a study carried out by Brito et al. [25], four native Developers with different levels of mycothophy were grown to develop different soil AMF conditions. The undisturbed soil was then used to grow wheat and analyze the protective effect of early colonization granted by native intact ERM on crop development in acidic soil with Mn toxicity. While Mn and P concentrations in shoots were very similar between wheat grown in soil with intact ERM of Lolium rigidum L. (LOL) and Ornithopus compressus L., (ORN) there was a two-fold increase in wheat shoot dry weight in the second, which implies a functional diversity of AMF under Mn toxicity conditions. The AMF diversity found in both LOL and ORN roots and that found in the following planted wheat may reflect different mechanisms employed to counter soil acidity and Mn toxicity, depending on the AMF assemblage [26,27]. While LOL as a Developer induced stress-evading strategies in wheat, ORN was seen to mainly promote growth [28].
In the present work, wheat shoot P concentration and subcellular distribution are followed in these systems to ascertain the AMF-induced mechanisms of P compartmentalization contributing to increased growth of wheat.

2. Experiments

2.1. Experimental Setup and Plant Material

Plants were grown on acidic soil collected from the top 20 cm of a granitic Cambisol reported to induce Mn toxicity symptoms in wheat [29,30], which was chemically [31] and biologically characterized [26]. The experimental setup followed was previously detailed [25]. Briefly, 8 L pots filled with the acidic Cambisol were used to grow LOL or ORN, two strongly mycotrophic endemic plants and Silene gallica L. (SIL), a non-mycotrophic endemic plant used as blank for ERM development. After seven weeks, plants were eliminated leaving the soil undisturbed (intact ERM). After seven days, ten wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Ardila) seedlings were planted, and after 21 days of growth, shoots were excised, weighted, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis.

2.2. Wheat Shoot Subcellular Partitioning

Subcellular P distribution in wheat shoots was determined according to [31]. Briefly, frozen wheat samples were ground in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in buffer solution (250 mM sucrose, 1.0 mM dithioerythritol and 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5)) in a ratio of 200 mg/5 mL buffer solution. The homogenate was centrifuged at 2500× g for 15 min. The pellet obtained, rich in cell walls, cellular debris and metal granules, was the designated the cell wall fraction (CWF). The supernatant was rich in organelle components (i.e., chloroplasts and mitochondria), cytoplasm and vacuole contents and was the designated organelle and vacuole content fraction (OVF). All fractions were kept at −80 °C until analysis.

2.3. Quantification of P in Wheat Shoots and Subcellular Fractions

Ground samples (50 mg) and respective subcellular fractions were lyophilized in a Telstar® LyoQuest lyophilizer for 3 days. To increase digestion efficiency, lyophilized samples were kept overnight in Teflon beakers with 2 mL of HNO3 (Suprapur, 67–69%, Fisher Chemicals) at room temperature. Subsequently, these solutions were heated (<120 °C) for 24 h, and following the addition of 0.5 mL of H2O2 (Suprapur, 30%, Merck) to further digest the organic material, they were heated again at 80 °C. The process was repeated until a clear solution with no precipitates was obtained. After complete digestion, samples were dried at 100 °C, and the solid residue was resuspended in a 2% HNO3 solution (50 mL) and kept at 4 °C until analysis. One digestion blank and two certified reference materials (NIST SRM 1573a, tomato leaves and NCS ZC73030, wheat) were included in each digestion batch to check accuracy, for method validation and to estimate the detection limits of each element.
P quantification was performed on an Agilent 8800 Triple Quadrupole ICP-MS, equipped with a Micromist nebulizer [31]. Instrument optimization was performed with a tuning solution (Agilent ICP-MS Tuning solution), containing 10 μg/L each of Ce, Co, Li, Tl and Y in a matrix of 2% HNO3 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Multi-element certificate standard solution ICP-MS-68B-A (100 mg/L) from High-Purity Standards (Charleston, SC, USA) was used for external calibration. Ruthenium (Ru), rhodium (Rh) and iridium (Ir) were used as internal standards for possible instrumental drifts and matrix effects corrections. The collision/reaction cell was set to “O2 mode”. The plasma gas flow rate was 15 mL/min, and the collision and reaction O2 flow rate was 0.5 mL/min. Analyses were optimized at 1350 W forward power and 1.1 L/min carrier gas flow with no dilution or makeup gas. The sampling depth (10 mm) and lens parameters were optimized for the highest signal and optimum peak shape while maintaining low oxides and doubly charged species. All operation modes were performed with the MS/MS scan type.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical processing was performed with version 26 of SPSS Statistics software. Statistical significance of data was determined with one-way ANOVA, and individual means were compared using Tukey’s post hoc test with p < 0.05 (Shapiro–Wilk test ensured data normality, and Browns–Forsythe test was used to test homoscedasticity). The results are presented as average and standard error values of 4 replicates.

3. Results

The phosphorus contents were determined for shoots and respective subcellular fractions of wheat grown in soil where SIL, LOL or ORN were previously grown. The effect of undisturbed soil from mycotrophic Developers was evident on wheat shoot P contents. Wheat shoot P concentrations were 1.7 ± 0.1-fold higher for LOL and 1.6 ± 0.1-fold higher for ORN when compared to those from SIL soil (Figure 1a). The site of P accumulation was assessed based on wheat shoot subcellular fractionation. While shoots of wheat grown in SIL soil showed a greater proportion of P in the symplast (60%) than in the apoplast (40%), in shoots of wheat grown in soil from LOL or ORN, P was evenly distributed (approx. 50%) (Figure 1b). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

The previous growth of native plants altered soil biologic properties by promoting the development of the respective associated microbiota. Previous studies determined that an intact ERM from AMF developed in symbiosis with these plants provided an increased growth response in succeeding planted crops, such as wheat [25]. Growth improvement seemed to be dependent on the AMF assembled in the soil by the previous native plant, even though the nutritional status of wheat showed only small variations. In the present work, P levels were again seen to increase as a result of the presence of intact ERM of mycotrophic Developer plants as the main AMF inoculum source, reaching almost twice the levels of wheat grown in soil with no previous ERM development and, therefore, colonized by spores and root fragments that grant a slower rate of colonization. By previously growing native Developers in the problematic soil, wheat benefited from stress-adapted AMF species that grant protection against soil acidity but also from establishing a fully formed ERM that provides an earlier colonization. AMF assemblages additionally managed P distribution in wheat shoots at the cellular level, increasing P proportion at the cell wall or apoplastic space. AMF can induce changes in the presence and activity of element transporters. Plant P uptake through the mycorrhizal pathway is performed via specialized Pi transporters induced by the fungal partner on the host root cell membrane. Through this pathway, P is delivered by the fungi, most likely as polyphosphates, as an alternative to inorganic phosphate forms (Pi), supplied through the direct pathway [32]. Nevertheless, not all colonizing AMF show a positive influence, and plant growth can be affected. Functional diversity as a result of differential AMF colonization can be considered to be the sum of individual effects of the benefits (P supply to the plant) and costs (C supply to the fungus) [33]. In the present study, despite showing different beneficial effects on wheat growth, the AMF associated with LOL or ORN influenced P contents and subcellular distribution in a similar way.

5. Conclusions

In acidic soils, native stress-adapted plants can be used to develop beneficial soil microbiota allied to restricted till practices in order to keep ERM intact, thereby enhancing crop growth and productivity. Among other advantages, this strategy provides protection against metal toxicity and improves plant growth and nutrition. Phosphorus shows the highest variation as a result of the presence of intact ERMs from AMFs associated with native plants. Previous growth of the native LOL and ORN increased wheat shoot P concentrations and managed P subcellular distribution. Implementation of this strategy has the potential to contribute to the development of greener agricultural practices.

Author Contributions

J.M.S.F., D.M.T., A.P.P., I.B., P.B. and M.C. conceived and designed the experiments; J.M.S.F., D.M.T., P.B., I.B. and M.C. performed the experiments; J.M.S.F., D.M.T. and A.P.P. analyzed the data; D.M.T., A.P.P., I.B. and M.C. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; J.M.S.F. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Jorge M. S. Faria) upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially funded by Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER), Programa Operacional Regional Alentejo 2020 under research contract ALT20-03-0145-FEDER-000039.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMFArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
CWFCell wall fraction
ERMExtraradical mycelium
ICP-MSInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
LOLLolium rigidum
ORNOrnithopus compressus
OVFVacuole contents fraction
SILSilene gallica

References

  1. Kochian:, L.V.; Hoekenga, O.A.; Piñeros, M.A. How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 459–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kochian, L.V.; Piñeros, M.A.; Liu, J.; Magalhaes, J.V. Plant adaptation to acid soils: The molecular basis for crop aluminum resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 571–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. George, E.; Horst, W.J.; Neumann, E. Chapter 17—Adaptation of plants to adverse chemical soil conditions. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Marschner, P., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 409–472. ISBN 978-0-12-384905-2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Paterson, E.; Goodman, B.A.; Farmer, V.C. The chemistry of aluminium, iron and manganese oxides in acid soils. In Soil Acidity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1991; pp. 97–124. [Google Scholar]
  5. Marschner, H. Mechanisms of adaptation of plants to acid soils. Plant Soil 1991, 134, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mou, D.; Yao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, C.; Achal, V. Plant high tolerance to excess manganese related with root growth, manganese distribution and antioxidative enzyme activity in three grape cultivars. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rivera-Becerril, F.; Juárez-Vázquez, L.V.; Hernández-Cervantes, S.C.; Acevedo-Sandoval, O.A.; Vela-Correa, G.; Cruz-Chávez, E.; Moreno-Espíndola, I.P.; Esquivel-Herrera, A.; De León-González, F. Impacts of manganese mining activity on the environment: Interactions among soil, plants, and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013, 64, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kushwaha, A.; Rani, R.; Kumar, S.; Gautam, A. Heavy metal detoxification and tolerance mechanisms in plants: Implications for phytoremediation. Environ. Rev. 2016, 24, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yadav, S.K. Heavy metals toxicity in plants: An overview on the role of glutathione and phytochelatins in heavy metal stress tolerance of plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. de Vargas, J.P.R.; dos Santos, D.R.; Bastos, M.C.; Schaefer, G.; Parisi, P.B. Application forms and types of soil acidity corrective: Changes in depth chemical attributes in long term period experiment. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 185, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Edwards, A.C. Soil acidity and its interactions with phosphorus availability for a range of different crop types. In Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH; Wright, R.J., Baligar, V.C., Murrmann, R.P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 299–305. ISBN 978-94-011-3438-5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oldroyd, G.E.D. Speak, friend, and enter: Signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bonfante, P.; Genre, A. Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant - Fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cabral, L.; Soares, C.R.F.S.; Giachini, A.J.; Siqueira, J.O. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of contaminated areas by trace elements: Mechanisms and major benefits of their applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pellegrino, E.; Öpik, M.; Bonari, E.; Ercoli, L. Responses of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A meta-analysis of field studies from 1975 to 2013. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 84, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rintoul, N.L.J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in plant nutrition and health. CAB Rev. 2016, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hildebrandt, U.; Regvar, M.; Bothe, H. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and heavy metal tolerance. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sudová, R.; Doubková, P.; Vosátka, M. Mycorrhizal association of Agrostis capillaris and Glomus intraradices under heavy metal stress: Combination of plant clones and fungal isolates from contaminated and uncontaminated substrates. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2008, 40, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krishnamoorthy, R.; Kim, C.-G.; Subramanian, P.; Kim, K.-Y.; Selvakumar, G.; Sa, T.-M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community structure, abundance and species richness changes in soil by different levels of heavy metal and metalloid concentration. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lenoir, I.; Fontaine, J.; Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to abiotic stresses: A review. Phytochemistry 2016, 123, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, A.G. Role of soil microbes in the rhizospheres of plants growing on trace metal contaminated soils in phytoremediation. Proc. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 18, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Selvaraj, T.; Chellappan, P. Arbuscular mycorrhizae: A diverse personality. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2006, 7, 349–358. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jin, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Gange, A.C. Mycorrhizal-induced growth depression in plants. Symbiosis 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brito, I.; Goss, M.J.; Alho, L.; Brígido, C.; van Tuinen, D.; Félix, M.R.; Carvalho, M. Agronomic management of AMF functional diversity to overcome biotic and abiotic stresses—The role of plant sequence and intact extraradical mycelium. Fungal Ecol. 2019, 40, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brito, I.; Carvalho, M.; Alho, L.; Goss, M.J. Managing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for bioprotection: Mn toxicity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 68, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Brígido, C.; van Tuinen, D.; Brito, I.; Alho, L.; Goss, M.J.; Carvalho, M. Management of the biological diversity of AM fungi by combination of host plant succession and integrity of extraradical mycelium. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 112, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Campos, C.; Carvalho, M.; Brígido, C.; Goss, M.J.; Nobre, T. Symbiosis specificity of the preceding host plant can dominate but not obliterate the association between wheat and its arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal partners. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Campos, C.; Nobre, T.; Goss, M.J.; Faria, J.; Barrulas, P.; Carvalho, M. Transcriptome analysis of wheat roots reveals a differential regulation of stress responses related to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil disturbance. Biology 2019, 8, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Goss, M.J.; Carvalho, M.J.G.P.R.; Cosimini, V.; Fearnhead, M.L. An approach to the identification of potentially toxic concentrations of manganese in soils. Soil Use Manag. 1992, 8, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carvalho, M.; Goss, M.J.; Teixeira, D. Manganese toxicity in Portuguese Cambisols derived from granitic rocks: Causes, limitations of soil analyses and possible solutions. Rev. Ciênc. Agrár. 2015, 38, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Faria, J.M.S.; Teixeira, D.M.; Pinto, A.P.; Brito, I.; Barrulas, P.; Alho, L.; Carvalho, M. Toxic levels of manganese in an acidic Cambisol alters antioxidant enzymes activity, element uptake and subcellular distribution in Triticum aestivum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 193, 110355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Campos, P.; Borie, F.; Cornejo, P.; López-Ráez, J.A.; López-García, Á.; Seguel, A. Phosphorus acquisition efficiency related to root traits: Is mycorrhizal symbiosis a key factor to wheat and barley cropping? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Smith, S.E.; Jakobsen, I.; Grønlund, M.; Smith, F.A. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: Interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Concentration (mg/Kg shoot dry weight (DW)) and (b) proportion in the apoplast () and symplast () of P in shoots of wheat grown for 3 weeks in undisturbed acidic cambic soil with previously grown non-mycotrophic Silene gallica (SIL) and strongly mycotrophic Lolium rigidum (LOL) or Ornithopus compressus (ORN) in Mn toxic conditions.
Figure 1. (a) Concentration (mg/Kg shoot dry weight (DW)) and (b) proportion in the apoplast () and symplast () of P in shoots of wheat grown for 3 weeks in undisturbed acidic cambic soil with previously grown non-mycotrophic Silene gallica (SIL) and strongly mycotrophic Lolium rigidum (LOL) or Ornithopus compressus (ORN) in Mn toxic conditions.
Blsf 04 00062 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faria, J.M.S.; Teixeira, D.M.; Pinto, A.P.; Brito, I.; Barrulas, P.; Carvalho, M. Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum Type Influences Phosphorus Subcellular Distribution in Shoots of Wheat Grown in Acidic Soil under Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08596

AMA Style

Faria JMS, Teixeira DM, Pinto AP, Brito I, Barrulas P, Carvalho M. Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum Type Influences Phosphorus Subcellular Distribution in Shoots of Wheat Grown in Acidic Soil under Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 4(1):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08596

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faria, Jorge M. S., Dora Martins Teixeira, Ana Paula Pinto, Isabel Brito, Pedro Barrulas, and Mário Carvalho. 2021. "Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum Type Influences Phosphorus Subcellular Distribution in Shoots of Wheat Grown in Acidic Soil under Sustainable Agricultural Practices" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 4, no. 1: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08596

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop