Next Article in Journal
Developing an Agent-Based Model for Haplodrassus rufipes (Araneae: Gnaphosidae), a Generalist Predator Species of Olive Tree Pests: Conceptual Model Outline
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Siliceous Minerals as Natural Nitrification Inhibitors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

A Comparative Study of Phytochemical Constituents and Bioactivity of n-Hexane and Dichloromethane Extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus †

Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2020; Available online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08770
Published: 1 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science)

Abstract

:
This study assessed and compared the chemical profile and the antioxidant and anti-proliferative activities of non-polar extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa (Sibth. & Sm.) Ball. and J. oxycedrus L. from Italy. The aerial parts of both Juniperus subspecies were subjected to exhaustive macerations with n-hexane and dichloromethane as solvents. Extracts were investigated for their chemical profile by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Ferric reducing activity power (FRAP), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and β-carotene bleaching assays were applied to study the antioxidant properties. The cytotoxic activity was evaluated using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay against several cancer human cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, A549, and COR-L23 cells). Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes mainly characterized n-hexane extracts while diterpenes and fatty acids were the most abundant identified compounds in dichloromethane extracts. The n-hexane and dichloromethane extracts of J. oxycedrus showed the most promising cytotoxic activity against the COR-L23 cell line with IC50 values of 26.9 and 39.3 µg/mL, respectively. J. macrocarpa revealed great radicals scavenging activity. Overall, the obtained results suggest that both Juniperus species are a good source of potential antioxidants and anti-proliferative compounds.

1. Introduction

The genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae) includes about 60 species native plants of the Mediterranean regions. J. oxycedrus is a shrub or small tree native of the west Mediterranean region, from Morocco and Portugal east to southern Italy while J. macrocarpa is a Mediterranean species growing on coastal sand dunes [1].
Many biological effects exerted by the Juniperus species, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, anticancer, and antifungal activities, are reported in literature [2,3].
Cancer is one of the major causes of mortality in the world and due to its prevalence, the discovery of novel anticancer agents is of great importance [4].
Phytochemicals and their derivatives have shown a remarkable potential for the development of chemotherapeutic agents. Examples are paclitaxel, vinblastine, and vincristine, used for the treatment of several types of cancer.
The increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and/or the decrease of the antioxidant defense systems are responsible for oxidative stress [5]. Several works have suggested the implication of ROS in the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in initiation, promotion, and progression of carcinogenesis and proposed antioxidants are an important line of defense to regulate significant signaling transduction pathways, including nuclear factor kB, mitogen-activated protein kinases, nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2, and phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases/protein kinase B, by repairing damaged DNA, reducing cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Therefore, cancer cells can be prevented and reversed without harming normal cells by oxidative modifications of DNA, leading to the reduction of ROS levels.
In this context, herein we investigated the chemical profile, in vitro antioxidant effects, and anti-proliferative activities against four human cancer cell lines of n-hexane and dichloromethane extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus collected in Southern Italy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Extraction Procedure

The aerial parts of Juniperus macrocarpa were harvested in Isola di Capo Rizzuto (Sounther Italy). The aerial parts of J. oxycedrus were harvested in Corigliano Calabro (Cosenza, Sounther Italy). Samples were authenticated by Dr. N.G. Passalacqua at the Natural History Museum of Calabria and Botanic Garden, University of Calabria (Rende, CS, Italy).
The aerial parts of Juniperus macrocarpa (200 g) and J. oxycedrus (200 g) were extracted by the maceration method using n-hexane (1 L) and dichloromethane (1 L) as sovents. The extraction procedure was repeated three times and each process maintained for 72 h. Yields of 0.6 and 0.4% for n-hexane extracts and 3.5 and 4.0% for dichloromethane extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus respectively, were obtained.

2.2. Chemical Analyses

Chemical analyses were performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gas chromatography (GC) [6]. In brief, GC-MS analyses were carried out on a Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatograph with a fused silica HP-5 capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness) and helium as carrier gas (Agilent, Milan, Italy). Ionization energy voltage 70 eV was used. The column temperature was initially kept at 50 °C for 5 min, then increased to 280 °C at 13 °C/min, and held for 10 min at 280 °C. GC analyses were performed using a Shimadzu GC17A gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Milan, Italy) equipped with flame ionization detector (FID) and using a HP-5 MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d.; film thickness 0.25 µm) (Agilent, Milan, Italy). Flame ionization detection (FID) was performed at 280 °C. Nitrogen was the carrier gas. The temperatures were programmed as described above. Constituents were tentatively identified comparing their retention times either with those in the literature or with those of authentic compounds available in our laboratory. Further identification was made by comparing their mass spectra with either those stored in Wiley 275 library or with mass spectra from the literature and from our in-house library [7].

2.3. In Vitro Anti-Proliferative Activity

2.3.1. Cells Culture

Four human cancer cell lines, namely breast cancer MCF-7, triple negative breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231, lung large cell carcinoma COR-L23, and lung carcinoma A549, purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA), were used. COR-L23 cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium, while A549, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). Both media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere with 95% humidity.

2.3.2. Sulforhodamine B (SRB) Assay

The potential anti-proliferative activity of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus extracts was assessed using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay [8]. In this assay, cells were placed in 96-well plates in a range from 5 × 104 to 15 × 104 cells. After 24 h, cells were treated with 100 mL/well of different concentrations of extracts. After 48 h, cells were fixed with ice-cold 40% trichloroacetic acid and were stained with 50 mL of 0.4% (w/v) SRB in 1% acetic acid. After 30 min, the plates were washed with 1% acetic acid and air-dried overnight. To read the plates, the bound dye was solubilized with 100 mL of 10 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris base). The absorbance was read at 490 nm (Molecular Devices SpectraMax Plus Plate Reader, Celbio, Milan, Italy). Cell survival was measured as percentage absorbance compared with the untreated control.

2.4. Antioxidant Tests

The antioxidant activity of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus extracts was investigated using (a) ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), (b) 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic) acid (ABTS), (c) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and (d) β-carotene bleaching tests.
For the preparation of FRAP reagent, a mixture of tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) solution, HCl, FeCl3, and acetate buffer (pH 3.6) was prepared as reported by Tenuta et al. [9]. Extracts at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL in ethanol were mixed with FRAP reagent and water. After 30 min of incubation at 25 °C, the absorption was measured at 595 nm.
ABTS assay was applied as previously described [9]. A solution of ABTS radical cation was prepared. After 12 h, this solution was diluted with ethanol to an absorbance of 0.70 at 734 nm using a UV-Vis Jenway 6003 spectrophotometer. Dilution of extracts in ethanol were added to 2 mL of diluted ABTS solution in order to test concentrations in the range 1–400 μg/mL. After 6 min, the absorbance was read at 734 nm.
DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined according to the technique previously reported [9]. An aliquot of 1.5 mL of 0.25 mM DPPH radical (DPPH·) in ethanol was mixed with 12 μL of samples in order to test concentrations ranging from 1 to 1000 μg/mL. The absorbance was determined at 517 nm with a UV-Vis Jenway 6003 spectrophotometer. In the β-carotene bleaching test, a mixture of linoleic acid, Tween 20, and β-carotene was prepared as previously described [9]. β-Carotene was added to linoleic acid 100% Tween 20. After evaporation of the solvent and dilution with water, the emulsion was added to a 96-well microplate containing samples in ethanol. The plate was left to incubate at 45 °C for 30 and 60 min. The absorbance was measured at 470 nm.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (S.D.) (n = 3). IC50 values were calculated by using Prism GraphPad Prism version 4.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) followed by a multicomparison Dunnett’s test (α = 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Profile

The non-polar extracts of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
The n-hexane extract of J. macrocarpa showed α-pinene, p-cymene, manoyl oxide, 13-epi-manoyl oxide, α-terpeneol, α-cubebene, β-cubebene, lauric acid, palmitic acid, ethyl palmitate, ethyl linoleate, and ethyl linolenate as main constituents.
The n-hexane extract of J. oxycedrus was characterized by the presence, as most abundant constituents, of verbenone, α-cubebene, 1-octadecene, abieta-8,11,13-trien-7-one, cadalene, ferruginol, and different fatty acids, such as lauric acid, ethyl laurate, palmitic acid, ethyl palmitate, ethyl myristate, stearctic acid, and methyl lignocerate. α-Pinene, myrcene, p-cymene, manoil oxide, γ-cadinene, δ-cadinene, sandaracopimaradiene, abietatriene, abietadiene, dehydroabietal, and several alkanes are the main constituents identified in the dichloromethane extract of J. macrocarpa. On the other hand, the dichloromethane extract of J. oxycedrus showed as more abundant constituents the abietane diterpenes abietatriene, abietadiene, ferruginol, the coumarin umbelliferone, some fatty acids, and their derivatives (palmitic acid, ethyl palmitate, ethyl myristate, stearctic acid, and methyl lignocerate).

3.2. Anti-Proliferative Activity

In order to investigate the effects on cellular viability of the aerial parts of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus extracts were investigated by using SRB assay against four human cancer cell lines, namely MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, A549, and MDA-MB-231 cells (Table 1).
Control experiments using non-tumorigenic 3T3-L1 cells were performed.
Both n-hexane and dichloromethane extracts of J. oxycedrus showed promising cytotoxic activity against the COR-L23 cell line with IC50 values of 26.9 and 39.3 µg/mL, respectively. The same extracts are able also to inhibit the lung carcinoma (A549) cell growth with IC50 values of 46.0 and 59.3 µg/mL, for n-hexane and dichloromethane, respectively.
J. macrocarpa extracts were not active at the highest tested concentration, except for the n-hexane extract against COR-L23 (IC50 value of 75.1 µg/mL). None of the tested extracts affected the proliferation of 3T3-L1 cells suggesting a selective action against cancer cells.

3.3. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant properties of Juniperus subspecies were studied by four methods, namely DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, and β-carotene bleaching assays. Results are summarized in Table 2.
Dichloromethane extracts of both Juniperus species exhibited the highest activity. Considering the radicals scavenging activity, the dichloromethane extract of J. macrocarpa was the most active with IC50 values of 16.8 and 48.8 µg/mL in ABTS and DPPH tests, respectively. Conversely, the dichloromethane extract of J. oxycedrus was the most active in FRAP and β-carotene bleaching tests with a value of 34.9 µM Fe(II)/g in FRAP test and IC50 values of 26.4 and 87.0 µg/mL after 30 and 60 min of incubation, respectively, in the β-carotene bleaching test.

4. Discussion

An increasing number of studies have demonstrated the importance of Juniperus species as the source of phytochemicals with promising anti-cancer effects [2,3]. In the current work, the anti-proliferative activity of non-polar extracts of two Juniperus species were investigated. J. oxycedrus showed greater and more promising anti-proliferative activity against lung carcinoma than J. macrocarpa. These data are better than those obtained with the positive control vinblastin. Instead, except for the n-hexane extract, J. macrocarpa exhibited good radicals scavenging activity in both ABTS and DPPH tests.
Some abietane diterpenes were identified in the dichloromethane extract of J. oxycedrus. In the literature survey, the abietane diterpene ferruginol was demonstrated to possess anti-cancer properties [10,11]. Jia et al. [10] demonstrated that ferruginol suppressed the proliferation of SK-Mel-28 human malignant melanoma cells in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner through the induction of apoptosis. Apoptotic effects was mediated via p38 phosphorylation and RELA translocation to nucleus.
Another compound identified in J. oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus dichloromethane extract was umbelliferone. This coumarin has been reported to exhibit in vivo anti-tumor and immunomodulatory effects against sarcoma 180, [12]. Moreover, Yu et al. [13] reported the anti-cancer activity in human hepatoma cells HepG2 of umbelliferone through the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Umbelliferone inhibited the proliferation and migration of laryngeal cancer cells [14]. The anti-cancer potential effects of umbelliferone have also been described against 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced rat mammary carcinoma [15].
Previous studies have reported cytotoxic effects of some Juniperus species on several human cancer cell lines including lung cancer cells A549 [2]. Different extracts have been tested. Among them, the methanol extracts of J. oxycedrus and J. macrocarpa from Turkey were assessed against the human hepatocellular liver carcinoma (HepG2 cells). However, no effects on viability of these cell line were reported [16]. In another work, De Marino et al. [17] investigated the potential activity of a n-butanol extract of J. oxycedrus against breast cancer (MCF-7 cell line), malignant melanoma (A375 cell line) and lung carcinoma (H460 cell line). Interesting results were only obtained against MCF-7 cancer cells.

5. Conclusions

This work was designed to carry out a comparative study of n-hexane and dichloromethane extracts of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus as potential source of antioxidant and anti-proliferative agents. In order to investigate the cytotoxic effects of the n-hexane and dichloromethane extracts of Juniperus species on cancer cells, four human cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, A549, and COR-L23) were selected. Analysis of obtained results showed a promising and selective anti-proliferative activity of both extracts of J. oxycedrus in a concentration-dependent manner against lung cancer cells lines A549 and COR-L23. J. oxycedrus may represents the best candidate for further in vivo studies to find new natural potential anticancer compounds. Our results confirm the prominent role of plant-derived molecules in the search for new therapeutic compounds.

Author Contributions

M.B. carried out the overall project design experimental work; M.R.L. and R.T. analyzed results; R.T., M.R.L. and M.B. wrote the manuscript; R.T. and M.R.L. conceptualized aspects of the project and assisted with reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Nicodemo G. Passalacqua, Natural History Museum of Calabria and Botanic Garden, University of Calabria, Italy, for harvesting plant materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ABTS2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic) acid
BHTButylated hydroxytoluene
DPPH2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
FRAPFerric reducing antioxidant power
IC50Half maximal inhibitory concentration
ROSReactive oxygen species
SDStandard deviation
SRBSulforhodamine B
TPTZTripyridyltriazine

References

  1. Orhan, N.; Orhan, I.E.; Ergun, F. Insights into cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of five Juniperus species. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 2305–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yaglioglu, A.S.; Eser, F. Screening of some Juniperus extracts for the phenolic compounds and their antiproliferative activities. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 113, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Loizzo, M.R.; Saab, A.M.; Tundis, R.; Statti, G.A.; Menichini, F.; Lampronti, I.; Gambari, R.; Cinatl, J.; Doer, H.W. Phytochemical analysis and in vitro antiviral activities of the essential oils of seven Lebanon species. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Majolo, F.; Knabbende Oliveira Becker Delwing, L.; Marmitt, D.J.; Bustamante-Filho, I.C.; Goettert, M.I. Medicinal plants and bioactive natural compounds for cancer treatment: Important advances for drug discovery. Phytochem. Lett. 2019, 31, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hecht, F.; Pessoa, C.F.; Gentile, L.B.; Rosenthal, D.; Carvalho, D.P.; Fortunato, R.S. The role of oxidative stress on breast cancer development and therapy. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 4281–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tundis, R.; Bonesi, M.; Sicari, V.; Pellicanò, T.M.; Tenuta, M.C.; Leporini, M.; Menichini, F.; Loizzo, M.R. Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.: Chemical composition, antioxidant properties and hypoglycaemic activity via the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 25, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Loizzo, M.R.; Abouali, M.; Salehi, P.; Sonboli, A.; Kanani, M.; Menichini, F.; Tundis, R. In vitro antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of nine Salvia species. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 2278–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tenuta, M.C.; Brigitte Deguin, B.; Loizzo, M.R.; Dugay, A.; Acquaviva, R.; Malfa, G.A.; Bonesi, M.; Bouzidi, C.; Tundis, R. Contribution of flavonoids and iridoids to the hypoglycaemic, antioxidant, and nitric oxide (NO) inhibitory activities of Arbutus unedo L. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Jia, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Ferruginol induced apoptosis on SK-Mel-28 human malignant melanoma cells mediated through P-p38 and NF-κB. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2019, 38, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Xiong, W.-D.; Gong, J.; Xing, C. Ferruginol exhibits anticancer effects in OVCAR-3 human ovary cancer cells by inducing apoptosis, inhibition of cancer cell migration and G2/M phase cell cycle arrest. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 7013–7017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Stefanova, T.H.; Nikolova, N.J.; Toshkova, R.A.; Neychev, H.O. Antitumor and immunomodulatory effect of coumarin and 7-hydroxycoumarin against Sarcoma 180 in mice. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2007, 6, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, S.-M.; Hu, D.-H.; Zhang, J.-J. Umbelliferone exhibits anticancer activity via the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 3869–3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kielbus, M.; Skalicka-Wozniak, K.; Grabarska, A.; Jeleniewicz, W.; Dmoszyńska-Graniczka, M.; Marston, A.; Polberg, K.; Gawda, P.; Janusz Klatka, J.; Stepulak, A. 7-Substituted coumarins inhibit proliferation and migration of laryngeal cancer cells in vitro. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 4347–4356. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Maucher, A.; von Angerer, E. Antitumour activity of coumarin and 7-hydroxycoumarin against 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced rat mammary carcinomas. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 1994, 120, 502–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Taviano, M.F.; Marino, A.; Trovato, A.; Bellinghieri, V.; Melchini, A.; Dugo, P.; Cacciola, F.; Donato, P.; Mondello, L.; Güvenç, A.; et al. Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. oxycedrus and Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. macrocarpa (Sibth. & Sm.) Ball.“berries” from Turkey: Comparative evaluation of phenolic profile, antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 58, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. De Marino, S.; Festa, C.; Zollo, F.; Rusolo, F.; Capone, F.; Guerriero, E.; Costantini, S.; De Felice, V.; Iorizzi, M. Phytochemical profile of Juniperus oxycedrus ssp. oxycedrus berries: A new monoterpene glucoside and evaluation of the effects on cancer cell lines. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 10, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Anti-proliferative activity (IC50 µg/mL) of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus.
Table 1. Anti-proliferative activity (IC50 µg/mL) of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus.
MCF7MDA-MB-231A549COR-L233T3-L1
J. macrocarpa
n-Hexane >200>200>20075.1 ± 2.5 **>200
Dichloromethane>200>200>200>200>200
J. oxycedrus
n-Hexane >200>20046.0 ± 2.4 **26.4 ± 1.3 **>200
Dichloromethane103.8 ± 3.8 **126.8 ± 4.8 **59.7 ± 1.9 **39.3 ± 1.8 **>200
Positive control
Taxol0.08 ± 0.0041.61 ± 0.03
Vinblastin 67.3 ± 2.045.5 ± 0.743.8 ± 0.9
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). ** p < 0.001 vs. control.
Table 2. In vitro antioxidant activity of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus extracts.
Table 2. In vitro antioxidant activity of J. macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus extracts.
SampleABTS
IC50 (µg/mL)
DPPH
IC50 (µg/mL)
FRAP Test
µM Fe(II)/g c
β-Carotene Bleaching Test
IC50 (µg/mL)
30 min60 min
Juniperus macrocarpa
n-Hexane 4.0% a48.8 ± 2.8 ****6.4 ± 0.3 ****25.1% d12.5% d
Dichloromethane16.8 ± 1.1 ****44.8 ± 2.6 ****11.7 ± 1.2 ****71.4 ± 2.2 ****90.9 ± 1.2 ****
Juniperus oxycedrus
n-Hexane19.4% a31.9% b6.9 ± 0.9 ****22.07% d25.40% d
Dichloromethane73.2 ± 2.7 ****131.9 ± 5.3 ****34.9 ± 1.9 ****26.4 ± 1.8 ****87.0 ± 3.8 ****
Positive control
Ascorbic acid1.7 ± 0.45.1 ± 0.8
BHT 63.2 ± 4.4
Propyl gallate 1.1 ± 0.051.0 ± 0.06
Data are expressed as means ± S.D. (n = 3). a at the maximum concentration tested (500 μg/mL). b at the maximum concentration tested (1000 μg/mL). c at 2.5 mg/mL. d at the maximum concentration tested (100 μg/mL). Differences within and between groups were evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by a multicomparison Dunnett’s test (α = 0.05): **** p < 0.0001 compared with the positive controls.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tundis, R.; Bonesi, M.; Loizzo, M.R. A Comparative Study of Phytochemical Constituents and Bioactivity of n-Hexane and Dichloromethane Extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08770

AMA Style

Tundis R, Bonesi M, Loizzo MR. A Comparative Study of Phytochemical Constituents and Bioactivity of n-Hexane and Dichloromethane Extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 4(1):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tundis, Rosa, Marco Bonesi, and Monica Rosa Loizzo. 2021. "A Comparative Study of Phytochemical Constituents and Bioactivity of n-Hexane and Dichloromethane Extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 4, no. 1: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08770

APA Style

Tundis, R., Bonesi, M., & Loizzo, M. R. (2021). A Comparative Study of Phytochemical Constituents and Bioactivity of n-Hexane and Dichloromethane Extracts of Juniperus macrocarpa and J. oxycedrus. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 4(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08770

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop