Next Article in Journal
Development of In Vitro Root Culture and miRNAs Analysis for Secondary Metabolites of Native Plants from the Mexican Bajio
Previous Article in Journal
Abiotic Stress Upregulates the Expression of Genes Involved in PSV and Autophagy Routes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Biofortification with Selenium: Enrichment Index and Interactions among Nutrients †

by
Ana Coelho Marques
1,2,*,
Cláudia Campos Pessoa
1,2,
Ana Rita F. Coelho
1,2,
Inês Carmo Luís
1,2,
Diana Daccak
1,2,
Paula Scotti Campos
2,3,
Manuela Simões
1,2,
Ana Sofia Almeida
2,4,
Maria F. Pessoa
1,2,
Fernando H. Reboredo
1,2,
Mauro Guerra
5,
Roberta G. Leitão
5,
José C. Ramalho
2,6,
Paula Marques
7,
Maria Manuela Silva
2,8,
Paulo Legoinha
1,2,
Isabel P. Pais
2,3 and
Fernando Lidon
1,2
1
Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Campus da Caparica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
2
GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Campus da Caparica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
3
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
4
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Estrada de Gil Vaz 6, 7351-901 Elvas, Portugal
5
LIBPhys-UNL, Physics Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Campus da Caparica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
6
PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 2784-505 Oeiras and Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
7
Centro Operativo e Tecnológico do Arroz (COTARROZ), 2120-014 Salvaterra de Magos, Portugal
8
Escola Superior de Educação Almeida Garrett (ESEAG-COFAC), Avenida do Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2020. Available online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08701
Published: 1 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science)

Abstract

:
Selenium is an antioxidant trace mineral important for human health and development. Therefore, the growing demand for efficient, bioeconomic and sustainable strategies to increase Se content in cereals, namely, rice, is justified. In this context, biofortification is a strategy that can promote nutrient enhancement in food crops and, therefore, increased nutrient uptake in the human body. In this framework, a technical itinerary was implemented using a rice genotype (OP1509), through foliar spraying with two selenium concentrations (25 and 100 g Se.ha−1) of sodium selenate (Na2SeO4) and sodium selenite (Na2SeO3). It was found that the average Se biofortification index was 1.8–4.7- and 5.4–6.0-fold in selenate and selenite treatments, respectively. The contents of Se, Ca, Fe, K, P, C, H and O in brown rice grains were also quantified and it was found that both forms of fertilizers increased Zn contents with 25 g Se.ha−1, but decreased with 100 g Se.ha−1. Moreover, Ca only increased significantly with selenate pulverization. The application of both forms also increased grain weight, but did not affect the colorimetric analysis. It is concluded that the applied itinerary can be implemented to minimize Se malnutrition.

1. Introduction

Selenium is an essential micronutrient for humans and may be a benefit to higher plants [1,2]. The low presence of micronutrients (namely, Se) in staple foods, namely, rice, results in the evolution of deficiencies in more than half of the world population [2,3]. Selenium deficiency affects about 800 million (15%) population of the world [4], triggering hypothyroidism, male infertility, weakness in the immune system and cardiovascular and carcinogenic diseases [5,6,7]. To surpass this deficiency, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a daily intake of 30–40 µg Se for adults [8], but problems linking to this nutrient deficiency are highly significant among staple food, namely, in cereal crops [9]. Nevertheless, positive effects of Se on plant growth have been reported, particularly under abiotic stress [10,11].
Biofortification of food crops is reported to provide a sustainable solution for Se deficiency in human diets [12]. Indeed, it has been reported that rice is one of the most social and economic important cereals in the world, yet, in spite of its nutritional properties, a global study of rice grains showed that there prevails an insufficient concentration of Se, for humans [13,14,15]. Accordingly, agronomic biofortification itineraries can be adopted as a strategy to increment Se content in rice grains [16]. Selenium content in rice grains can increase when foliar fertilizers, such as sodium selenate and sodium selenite, are applied [4,17]; however, agronomic biofortification depends upon its uptake either through roots or foliage and translocation [18].
Considering the importance of rice for human consumption, this study aimed at developing an agronomic itinerary for Se biofortification through foliar fertilization with sodium selenate and selenite in a new advanced rice line (Oryza sativa L. Poaceae).

2. Experiments

2.1. Experimental Fields

Field trials were conducted, from 30 May to 2 November of 2018, at the experimental station of the Rice Technological Center (COTARROZ), located in the middle of the lezíria ribatejana—Portugal (39°02′21.8″ N; 8°44′22.8″ W). One new advanced rice (O. sativa L. Poaceae) line (coded as OP1509) of the national Breeding Program, carried out by the Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (INIAV, Elvas, Portugal), was used as a test system.
OP1509 was sown in six row plots and then immediately irrigated. The experimental design was performed in randomized blocks and a factorial arrangement (3 concentrations × 2 forms selenium × 1 genotypes × 4 replicates = 24 plots). The plot size for each replication was 9.6 m2. The agronomic management of trials, namely, the application of nitrogen fertilizers, control of weeds, insect pests and diseases and the water management (irrigation), was the recommended and typically used for rice crops.
The agronomic Se biofortification comprised three distinct phases. The first Se application occurred at the end of booting, the second at anthesis and the third during the milky grain stage. Biofortification was carried out by foliar spraying with solutions (at 25 and 100 g Se.ha−1) of sodium selenate (Na2SeO4) and sodium selenite (Na2SeO3). Control plants were not sprayed at any time. Grain harvest occurred on 2 November 2018.

2.2. Analysis of Macro and Micronutrients Contents

Quantification of Se, Zn, Ca, Fe, K, P, C, H and O in tissues was determined in harvested grains from control and sprayed plots, with selenate and selenite, at 0 and 100 g Se.ha−1, using a µ-EDXRF system (M4 Tornado™, Bruker, Germany) [19]. The X-ray generator was operated at 50 kV and 100 µA without the use of filters, to enhance the ionization of low-Z elements. For a better quantification of Se, a set of filters between the X-ray tube and the sample, composed of three foils of Al/Ti/Cu (with a thickness of 100/50/25 µm, respectively) was used. All the measurements were performed with a 600 µA current. The values of the content of the elements were obtained through the average of four readings. Measurements were carried out under 20 mbar vacuum conditions. These point spectra were acquired during 200 s.

2.3. Thousand Grains Weight and Colorimetry Analysis

For each treatment, 1000 grains were picked randomly and weighed in triplicate. Subsequently, grains were hulled and whitened, as described in [17]. Determination of the colorimetric parameters of grain samples, using a fixed wavelength, followed [20]. The color parameters, using a fixed wavelength, adopted the methodology described by Ramalho et al. [21]. Brightness/brightness (L) and chromaticity parameters (a* and b* coordinates) were obtained with a Minolta CR 300 colorimeter (Minolta Corp., Ramsey, NJ, USA) coupled to a sample vessel (CR-A504). Using the illuminant D65, the system of the Commission Internationale d’Éclaire (CIE) was applied. The parameter L represents the brightness of the sample, translating the variation of the tonality between dark and light, with a range between black (0) and white (100). Parameters a* and b* indicate color variations. The value of a*characterizes coloring in the region from green (−60) to red (+60) and the value b* indicates coloring in the range between blue (−60) and yellow (+60). The approximation of these coordinates to the null value translates neutral colors, such as white, gray and black. Chroma is the relationship between the values of a* and b*, where the real color of the analyzed object is obtained. Hue is the angle formed between a* and b*, indicating the saturation of the object’s color. To calculate Chroma (C), Equation (1) was used and, to calculate Hue-Angle (H*), Equation (2). Measurements were carried out in quadruplicate in the grains of rice at harvest.
C * = a * 2 + b * 2
H * = a r c t g b * a *

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using a one-way or two-way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05), to assess differences among treatments. Based on the results, a Tukey’s for mean comparison was performed, considering a 95% confidence level. Statistical analysis was performed with an IBM SPSS Statistics 20 program.

3. Results

3.1. Accumulation of Chemical Elements in Rice Grains

Foliar spraying with sodium selenate and sodium selenite promoted the accumulation of Se in brown grains (Figure 1). Relatively to the control, the index of Se biofortification ranged between 1.8–4.7-fold and 5.4–6.0-fold after pulverization at 100 g Se.ha−1 with selenate and selenite, respectively. Accordingly, the selenite form revealed a higher Se accumulation in rice crops.
Foliar fertilization with Se interfered with the accumulation of other chemical entities (Table 1). In brown grains, through the application of both fertilizers, the Zn contents increased with 25 g Se.ha−1 but decreased with 100 g Se.ha−1. This was also verified in the concentration of all the elements when selenite was applied (except Fe and, also, H and O, that did not vary significantly). When selenate was applied, only the contents of Ca increased significantly, whereas the other chemical elements did not vary significantly.

3.2. Grain Weight and Colorimetry Analysis

The application of Se, in both forms, did not significantly affect grain weight in OP1509 (Table 2); however, in paddy grains, weight was found to be slightly higher with the application of sodium selenate.
The colorimetric analysis of paddy, brown and white grains, compared to control, did not show significant variations between treatments (Table 3). Parameters L* and H*, showed high values in white rice, while parameter C* presented higher values in paddy rice.

4. Discussion

The response of rice plants to Se application has been reported previously [22]. Several cultivars exposed to similar doses showed differences in Se content [23], since its accumulation depends on the characteristics of the genotype, concentration and form of Se applied [15]. This study showed that, for this genotype, both forms of the Se applied promoted biofortification (Figure 1). The average of Se contents in brown grains ranged between 1.8–4.7- and 5.4–6.0-fold with selenate and selenite, respectively. According to our findings, other studies also reported that, in rice foliar, application of sodium selenite is more effective than sodium selenate [24], because selenite is very mobile and easily absorbed by the plants [25].
Our data showed that 25g Se.ha−1 promoted the accumulation of Zn in the grain; however, with a higher dose, the value decreased (Table 1). This trend also agrees with other studies reporting that there is no effect on Zn when 15 g Se.ha−1 was applied [26], which suggests that these elements are metabolized and assimilated in different pathways [27]. As previously found [28], the application of selenate also promoted the accumulation of Ca in rice grains, whereas Fe and Zn did not vary with higher concentrations of this fertilizer. The highest grain weight was verified in paddy grains (Table 2) with selenate fertilization. Besides, the applied itinerary of biofortification produced higher brown grains, as verified in studies with application of selenite [15].
As our research team previously confirmed [18], after industrial processing, such as dehusking, whitening and milling, the luminosity (L) and saturation (H) parameters increased (Table 3). Additionally, the highest values of real color (C*) were observed in the paddy rice, although there were no significant changes, since the threshold of toxicity was not reached. Nevertheless, beside the genotype characteristics, it is necessary to consider external factors that can influence the color of the grain [29].

5. Conclusions

Foliar spraying with selenate or selenite concentrations (25 and 100 g Se.ha−1) did not surpass the threshold of toxicity in O. sativa L. Poaceae. The average of Se biofortification index was 1.8–4.7 times in selenate treatment and 5.4–6.0 times in selenite treatment. The contents of Ca, Fe, K and P varied according to the form and concentration applied; however, C, H and O contents did not vary significantly. The application of both forms increased grain weight in the genotype and did not affect the colorimetric analysis. Accordingly, it is concluded that the itinerary applied for the biofortification of rice (variety OP1509) can be implemented to minimize Se malnutrition.

Supplementary Materials

The poster presentation is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECPS2020-08701/s1.

Author Contributions

A.C.M., F.L., A.S.A., P.M. and J.C.R. conceived and designed the experiments; A.C.M., C.C.P., A.R.F.C., I.C.L., D.D., M.G. and R.G.L. performed the experiments; A.C.M. analyzed the data; M.F.P., F.H.R., M.M.S., P.L. and I.P.P. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; A.S.A., M.S. and P.S.C. supervised; A.C.M. and F.L. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Paula Marques, Cátia Silva (COTArroz) and Orivárzea (Orizicultores do Ribatejo, S.A.) for technical assistance, as well as project PDR2020-101-030671 for the financial support. We also thank the Research centers (GeoBioTec) UIDB/04035/2020 and (CEF) UIDB/00239/2020 for the support facilities. This work was supported by the project PDR2020-101-030671. This work was further supported by the research center grant N° UID/FIS/04559/2013 to LIBPhys-UNL.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. White, P.J. Selenium accumulation by plants. Ann. Bot. 2016, 117, 217–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Reis, A.; El-Ramady, H.; Santos, E.F.; Gratão, P.L.; Schomburg, L. Overview of selenium deficiency and toxicity worldwide: Affected areas, selenium-related health issues, and case studies. In Plant Ecophysiology; De Kok, L.J., Hakesford, M.J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 11, pp. 209–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, F.; McGrath, S. Biofortification and phytoremediation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boldrin, P.F.; Faquin, V.; Ramos, S.J.; Boldrin, K.V.F.; Ávila, F.W.; Guilherme, L.R.G. Soil and foliar application of selenium in rice biofortification. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 31, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. White, P.; Broadley, M. Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets—Iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 49–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fairweather-Tait, S.J.; Bao, Y.; Broadley, M.R.; Collings, R.; Ford, D.; Hesketh, E.; Hurst, R. Selenium in human health and disease. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2011, 14, 1337–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rayman, M.P.; Blundell-Pound, G.; Pastor-Barriuso, R.; Guallar, E.; Steinbrenner, H.; Stranges, S. A randomized trial of selenium supplementation and risk of type-2 diabetes, as assessed by plasma adiponectin. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e045269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Fordyce, F.M. Selenium deficiency and toxicity in the environment. In Essentials of Medical Geology; Selinus, O., Alloway, B., Centeno, J.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 375–416. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pérez-Corona, M.T.; Sanchez-Martınez, M.; Valderrama, M.J.; Rodriguez, M.E.; Camara, C.; Madrid, Y. Selenium biotransformation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus during white wine manufacture: Laboratory-scale experiments. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 1050–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ul-Huda, N.; Riaz, A.; Abbas, A.; Raza, S. Techniques for the Enrichment of Micronutrients in Crops through Biofortification: A Review. J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarwar, N.; Akhtar, M.; Kamran, M.A.; Imran, M.; Riaz, M.A.; Kamran, K.; Hussain, S. Selenium biofortification in food crops: Key mechanisms and future perspectives. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 93, 103–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, M.; Bijo, A.J.; Baghel, R.S.; Reddy, C.R.; Jha, B. Selenium and spermine alleviate cadmium induced toxicity in the red seaweed Gracilaria dura by regulating antioxidants and DNA methylation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 51, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cakmak, I. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil. 2008, 302, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Williams, P.; Lombi, E.; Sun, G.; Scheckel, K.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, X.; Zhu, J.; Carey, A.; Adomako, E.; Lawgali, Y.; et al. Selenium Characterization in the Global Rice Supply Chain. Environ. Sci. 2009, 43, 6024–6030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Y.D.; Wang, X.; Wong, Y.S. Generation of selenium-enriched rice with enhanced grain yield, selenium content and bioavailability through fertilisation with selenite. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2385–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duan, M.; Sun, Z.; Shu, L.; Tan, Y.; Yu, D.; Sun, X.; Liu, R.; Li, Y.; Gong, S.; Yuan, D. Genetic Analysis of an Elite Super-Hybrid Rice Parent Using High-Density SNP Markers. Rice 2013, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Lidon, F.; Oliveira, K.; Galhano, C.; Guerra, M.; Ribeiro, M.; Pelica, J.; Pataco, I.; Ramalho, J.; Leitão, A.; Almeida, A.; et al. Selenium biofortification of rice through foliar application with selenite and selenate. Exp. Agric. 2018, 55, 528–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lidon, F.; Oliveira, K.; Ribeiro, M.; Pelica, J.; Pataco, I.; Ramalho, J.; Leitão, A.; Almeida, A.; Campos, P.; Ribeiro-Barros, A.; et al. Selenium biofortification of rice grains and implications on macronutrients quality. J. Cereal. Sci. 2018, 81, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R.; Bowen, H.C.; Johnson, S.E. Selenium and its relationship with sulfur. In Sulfur in Plants an Ecological Perspective; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 225–252. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cardoso, P.; Velu, G.; Singh, R.P.; Santos, J.P.; Carvalho, M.L.; Lourenço, V.M.; Lidon, F.C.; Reboredo, F.; Guerra, M. Localization and distribution of Zn and Fe in grains of biofortified bread wheat lines through micro- and triaxial- X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta B 2018, 141, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ramalho, J.C.; Pais, I.P.; Leitão, A.E.; Guerra, M.; Reboredo, F.H.; Máguas, C.M.; Carvalho, M.L.; Scotti-Campos, P.; Ribeiro-Barros, A.I.; Lidon, F.J.C.; et al. Can elevated air [CO2] conditions mitigate the predicted warming impact on the quality of coffee bean? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Geng, J.; Yu, M.A.; Tang, S.M. Screening enriched-selenium hybrid rice cultivars of Hainan Province. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2010, 26, 376–380. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, L.X. Study on selenium rich ability of different rice varieties. Hortic. Seed 2011, 3, 111–113. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, H.F.; McGrath, S.P.; Zhao, F.J. Selenium uptake, translocation and speciation in wheat supplied with selenate or selenite. New Phytol. 2008, 178, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lyons, G.H.; Genc, Y.; Stangoulis, J.C.; Palmer, L.T.; Graham, R.D. Selenium distribution in wheat grain, and the effect of postharvest processing on wheat selenium content. Biol. Trace. Elem. Res. 2005, 103, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fang, Y.; Wang, L.; Xin, Z.; Zhao, L.; An, X.; Hu, Q. Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc, Selenium, and Iron Fertilizers on Nutrients Concentration and Yield of Rice Grain in China. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 2079–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sors, T.G.; Ellis, D.R.; Salt, D.E. Selenium uptake, translocation assimilation and metabolic fate in plants. Photosynth. Res. 2005, 86, 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fargasova, A.; Pastierova, J.; Svetkova, K. Effect of Se-metal pair combinations (Cd, Zn, Cu, Pb) on photosynthetic pigments production and metal accumulation in Synapis alba L. seedlings. Plant Soil Environ. 2006, 52, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lanning, S.; Siebenmorgen, T. Effects of preharvest nighttime air temperatures on whiteness of head rice. Cereal. Chem. 2013, 90, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Accumulation of Se in brown grains of O. sativa L. Poaceae, line OP1509, in the control and after foliar fertilization, with selenate and selenite, at 25 and 100 g Se.ha−1. Letters a and b indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1. Accumulation of Se in brown grains of O. sativa L. Poaceae, line OP1509, in the control and after foliar fertilization, with selenate and selenite, at 25 and 100 g Se.ha−1. Letters a and b indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Blsf 04 00039 g001
Table 1. Average values + S.D. (n = 4) of Zinc, Ca, Fe, K, P C, H and O contents in brown grains of O. sativa, line OP1509. Letters a, b and c indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 1. Average values + S.D. (n = 4) of Zinc, Ca, Fe, K, P C, H and O contents in brown grains of O. sativa, line OP1509. Letters a, b and c indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Treatments
(g Se.ha−1)
ZnCaFeKPCHO
mg.kg−1
Na2SeO4028.6 ± 1.43 a116.1 ± 5.80 a22.4 ± 1.12 a0.54 ± 0.03 a0.57 ± 0.03 a43.7 ± 2.18 a6.11 ± 0.31 a48.6 ± 2.43 a
2530.1 ± 1.50 a147.5 ± 7.38 a17.6 ± 0.88 a0.55 ± 0.03 a0.58 ± 0.03 a43.8 ± 2.19 a6.12 ± 0.31 a48.6 ± 2.43 a
10026.1 ± 1.31 a175.1 ± 8.76 b18.1 ± 0.90 a0.64 ± 0.03 a0.66 ± 0.66 a43.7 ± 2.19 a6.12 ± 0.31 a48.6 ± 2.43 a
Na2SeO3028.6 ± 1.43 a116.1 ± 5.80 c22.4 ± 1.12 b0.54 ± 0.03 b0.57 ± 0.03 b43.7 ± 2.18 a6.11 ± 0.31 a48.6 ± 2.43 a
2542.4 ± 2.12 b260.4 ± 13.02 b3.8 ± 1.74 a0.86 ± 0.04 a0.90 ± 0.04 a43.5 ± 2.17 a6.08 ± 0.30 a48.2 ± 2.41 a
10023.3 ± 1.17 a150.5 ± 7.52 a13.3 ± 0.67 c0.50 ± 0.03 b0.53 ± 0.03 b43.8 ± 2.19 a6.13 ± 0.31 a48.7 ± 2.43 a
Table 2. Average ± S.D. (n = 4) of 1000-grain weight of O. sativa, line OP1509, submitted to foliar application with sodium selenate and sodium selenite. Letter a indicates absence of significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 2. Average ± S.D. (n = 4) of 1000-grain weight of O. sativa, line OP1509, submitted to foliar application with sodium selenate and sodium selenite. Letter a indicates absence of significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Treatments (g Se.ha−1)PaddyBrown RiceWhite Rice
g.1000 g−1
Na2SeO4Control31.56 ± 0.67 a26.98 ± 0.36 a23.63 ± 0.19 a
2531.53 ± 0.61 a27.25 ± 0.57 a23.44 ± 0.40 a
10032.18 ± 1.71 a27.62 ± 0.69 a23.86 ± 0.44 a
Na2SeO3Control29.26 ± 0.52 a25.86 ± 0.63 a24.00 ± 0.81 a
2530.21 ± 0.51 a26.97 ± 0.27 a24.39 ± 0.14 a
10030.66 ± 1.38 a25.99 ± 0.38 a23.66 ± 0.17 a
Table 3. Colorimeter parameters of the paddy, brown and white flour of O. sativa, line OP1509. Letter a indicates the absence of significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). Average values are expressed ± S.D. (n = 4).
Table 3. Colorimeter parameters of the paddy, brown and white flour of O. sativa, line OP1509. Letter a indicates the absence of significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). Average values are expressed ± S.D. (n = 4).
Treatments
(g Se.ha−1)
L*C*H*
PaddyNa2SeO4057.16 ± 0.90 a31.43 ± 0.59 a77.36 ± 0.66 a
2557.91 ± 0.93 a31.07 ± 0.78 a78.15 ± 0.33 a
10057.02 ± 0.99 a31.11 ± 0.48 a77.63 ± 0.38 a
Na2SeO3057.71 ± 1.24 a30.49 ± 0.44 a77.54 ± 0.44 a
2556.94 ± 0.89 a30.01 ± 0.28 a77.96 ± 0.32 a
10057.78 ± 1.12 a31.30 ± 0.71 a77.09 ± 0.13 a
Brown riceNa2SeO4070.31 ± 3.98 a20.66 ± 2.23 a84.16 ± 2.04 a
2569.53 ± 3.97 a20.18 ± 2.39 a84.14 ± 1.68 a
10069.70 ± 4.56 a20.46 ± 2.58 a84.19 ± 1.26 a
Na2SeO3069.07 ± 3.57 a20.80 ± 1.69 a84.50 ± 1.29 a
2568.13 ± 4.97 a20.90 ± 2.61 a83.65 ± 1.51 a
10069.71 ± 4.14 a20.85 ± 1.94 a84.21 ± 1.39 a
White riceNa2SeO4076.24 ± 0.10 a10.87 ± 0.68 a94.56 ± 1.11 a
2575.86 ± 0.45 a9.65 ± 0.68 a95.24 ± 0.98 a
10075.93 ± 0.63 a9.58 ± 0.64 a94.74 ± 0.97 a
Na2SeO3074.38 ± 1.57 a10.40 ± 0.85 a94.46 ± 1.24 a
2576.16 ± 0.38 a10.46 ± 0.95 a94.30 ± 1.29 a
10076.06 ± 0.93 a10.48 ± 0.68 a93.65 ± 0.58 a
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marques, A.C.; Pessoa, C.C.; Coelho, A.R.F.; Luís, I.C.; Daccak, D.; Campos, P.S.; Simões, M.; Almeida, A.S.; Pessoa, M.F.; Reboredo, F.H.; et al. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Biofortification with Selenium: Enrichment Index and Interactions among Nutrients. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08701

AMA Style

Marques AC, Pessoa CC, Coelho ARF, Luís IC, Daccak D, Campos PS, Simões M, Almeida AS, Pessoa MF, Reboredo FH, et al. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Biofortification with Selenium: Enrichment Index and Interactions among Nutrients. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 4(1):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08701

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marques, Ana Coelho, Cláudia Campos Pessoa, Ana Rita F. Coelho, Inês Carmo Luís, Diana Daccak, Paula Scotti Campos, Manuela Simões, Ana Sofia Almeida, Maria F. Pessoa, Fernando H. Reboredo, and et al. 2021. "Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Biofortification with Selenium: Enrichment Index and Interactions among Nutrients" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 4, no. 1: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08701

APA Style

Marques, A. C., Pessoa, C. C., Coelho, A. R. F., Luís, I. C., Daccak, D., Campos, P. S., Simões, M., Almeida, A. S., Pessoa, M. F., Reboredo, F. H., Guerra, M., Leitão, R. G., Ramalho, J. C., Marques, P., Silva, M. M., Legoinha, P., Pais, I. P., & Lidon, F. (2021). Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Biofortification with Selenium: Enrichment Index and Interactions among Nutrients. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 4(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08701

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop