Abstract
This study aimed to determine the impact of invasive Rosa rugosa Thunb. on the plant communities of the Baltic coastal dunes. The study was carried out in 22 sites scattered along the Hel Peninsula (Poland). Each site consisted of a pair of plots: a plot with the invader vegetation and an adjacent plot with the resident vegetation (control plot). For each plot, botanical data (the abundance of individual species, total species richness and the richness of species belonging to different functional groups) were collected and basic soil parameters were measured. According to the analysis of the control plot species composition, the study sites can be divided into two groups, including the plant communities characteristic of the yellow dunes (Elymo-Ammophiletum arenariae association, EA; N = 11 sites) and those characteristic of the grey dunes (Helichryso-Jasionetum litoralis association, HJ; N = 11 sites). R. rugosa influenced these two communities differently. In the EA sites, it displaced many species, leading to a significant decrease in the species richness. In the HJ sites, it caused a shift in the species composition; although it outcompeted some species (e.g., zoochores), it also created conditions for the existence of others (e.g., graminoids, a plant group that, interestingly, was negatively affected by the invader in the EA sites). Changes in the plant communities probably resulted not only from the direct impacts of R. rugosa on the plants (by shading and occupying space) but also from invader-induced soil alternations (an increase in the organic layer thickness and an increase in pH and the content of some nutrients).
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECD2022-12414/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.W.W., P.K., I.G., M.S., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; methodology, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; software, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; validation, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; formal analysis, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; investigation, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; resources, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; data curation, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.W.W., P.K., M.S., I.G., E.R.-P. and A.M.S.; visualization, P.K.; supervision, M.W.W.; project administration, M.W.W.; funding acquisition, M.W.W. and A.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, under the project DEC-2017/01/X/NZ8/01805. It also received financial support from the W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Please ask the author: jurania@umk.pl.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).