Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Analytical Methods to Determine Regulatory Compliance of Coffee Leaf Tea
Previous Article in Journal
Case Study: Characterizing the Response of Young Glyphosate-Susceptible and Glyphosate-Resistant Amaranthus palmeri (Palmer Amaranth) after Being Sprayed with a Ten Percent Acetic Acid Solution to Control Growth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Ozone Effects on the Quality of Swiss Chard. Peri-Urban Crops a Case Study †

by
Susana Elvira
*,
Javier Sanz
,
Ignacio Gonzalez-Fernandez
and
Victoria Bermejo-Bermejo
Ecotoxicology of Air Pollution, Environmental Department, Research Center for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Plant Sciences—10th Anniversary of Journal Plants, 1–15 December 2021. Available online: https://iecps2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 11(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-12016
Published: 2 December 2021

Abstract

:
The results of this open-top chamber study show that the variety of chard cv. Fuenlabrada, cultivated on the outskirts of Madrid, can be considered moderately sensitive to ozone. A significant loss of marketable production, the alteration of pigment concentration and alteration of nutritional quality was measured in the plants exposed to different ozone levels. Swiss chard has a high nutritional value due to its high macronutrient content and the presence of micronutrients essential for human health. The results of this study showed a significant reduction in the concentration of Mg and Ca in commercial chard leaves of the local variety Fuenlabrada. These results suggest that ozone can induce a loss of nutritional quality in leafy crops with negative consequences for human health.

1. Introduction

Tropospheric ozone (O3) is an important greenhouse gas. It is considered one of the most damaging air pollutants to vegetation due to its phytotoxicity and prevalence at high concentrations over large areas across the globe [1,2,3,4,5].
The photochemical pollution in Southern Europe is a subject of great environmental importance [6]. Despite the considerable improvements in air quality during the last decade in Europe, 80% of the urban areas were exposed to ozone levels exceeding the WHO guidelines. A recent study on ambient air quality in Spain showed a substantial improvement in the last 25 years, with the exception of tropospheric ozone [7]. The same trend was observed in the Madrid air basin [8]. During the ozone episodes in summer, high ozone concentrations in rural and urban stations were recorded [9,10].
The ozone impact assessments for crops were mainly based on modelling conducted for changes on crop yield. The estimated global impact of O3 on crops suggests a yield reduction in major crops by 3–7%, causing high economic losses [11,12,13,14]. However, most estimates of the impact of current O3 levels on crop production do not include horticultural production. These crops cover small areas, but they are of great economic importance.
Horticultural crops have been identified as extremely sensitive to O3 damage [1,15,16,17,18]. Ozone causes a wide variety of damage to agricultural crops, including visible damage, reduced photosynthesis, alterations in carbon allocation, and a reduction in the quantity and quality of yield [1,17,19,20,21]. Visible leaf damage has been recorded in leafy crops, in some cases reaching a total loss of harvest in the field [15,22,23]. The effects of chronic exposure to O3 on physiology or performance were studied for species such as lettuce, spinach or palak [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, little information is available about the risk of ozone effects on quality traits.
Swiss chard is consumed all over the world, due to its organoleptic properties as well as its numerous benefits for human nutrition [31]. In addition, chard has a high nutritional importance as it contains fiber, vitamins A C E K B and minerals (calcium, iron, zinc phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, iron and manganese) [32,33,34].
Cumulative metrics for O3 exposure have been used along with estimations of the minimum thresholds for damage in order to estimate crop yield losses due to O3. Ozone threshold values (critical levels) were first established within the framework of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP, UNECE) for the protection of different vegetation types [35]. These critical levels are the basis for defining the objective values for plant protection in the European Air Quality Directive (2008/50/EC) and are the main tools for O3 risk assessment studies.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Experimental Field Facilities and Plant Material

The ozone fumigation experiments were carried out in an open-top chamber (OTC) facility located in central Spain: Finca Experimental La Higueruela (CSIC) (Santa Olalla, Toledo, 450 m.a.s.l.; 40°3′ N, 4°26′ W). Swiss chard plants were exposed to four O3 treatments: charcoal filtered air (FA) with over 50% filtration efficiency, which kept O3 levels below background concentrations; non-filtered air (NFA), reproducing current ambient levels; non-filtered air supplemented with 20 nL L−1 O3 (NFA+); and non-filtered air supplemented with 40 nL L−1 O3 (NFA++). Additional O3 supply for NFA+ and NFA++ treatments was applied during 8 h per day, 7 days a week using an O3 generator system (Model 16, A2Z Ozone Systems Inc., Louisville, KY, USA) fed with pure oxygen. The experiment followed a random block design with four O3 treatments, each replicated three times (three OTCs per O3 treatment). More details about the facility are provided in Calvete-Sogo et al. (2014).
The study was carried out on a native variety of chard (Beta vulgaris L. var cicla) from Fuenlabrada. The seeds were grown according to greenhouse standards until the plants were large enough for transplantation. Seedlings were transplanted to 2.5 L pots with a mix of unfertilized blond peat (60%), perlite (20%) and vermiculite (20%). Fertilization was carried out with Nutricote (NPK:18-6-8) at the time of transplanting. In each chamber, 4 plants were exposed to different ozone treatments for 43 days (from 4 April to 25 May).
A risk assessment study of ambient ozone effects on a native variety of chard, cv. Fuenlabrada, was carried out at a peri-urban agricultural area: Parque Agrario de Fuenlabrada (Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 660 m.a.s.l., 40°17′ N, 3°51′ W). The chard trial was carried out with organic mulch on the surface before planting (4 kg/m2), and then triple 15 fertilizer (150 kg/ha) was added. Equlibrium and Nutriseck were applied as a pest preventive method. Irrigation was carried out by a sprinkler, the most suitable method for the sandy soil of the area. Plant growth from transplantation to harvest in late summer was 43 days.
In parallel, the impact of ambient ozone levels was investigated through the quantification of visible lesions in the leaves of O3-sensitive and -tolerant varieties in an O3 bioindicator garden. The experimental design of the ozone garden was carried out using ozone tolerant/sensitive variety pairs. Six species were used (tomato, chard, bean, watermelon, tobacco and wheat) with a total of 24 varieties. Environmental growing conditions and ozone levels were collected from the Air Quality Network of the Community of Madrid (Fuenlabrada Station).

2.2. Physiological Measurements

2.2.1. Biomass

The biomass production was determined at the maximum development of the plant. All the leaves were collected and classified as commercial and non-commercial biomass. This classification was based on the absence or presence of lesions on the leaves. The fresh weight (FW) was determined for the total plant. A known FW sample from each category was dried in a ventilated oven at 65 °C for 48 h to obtain the dry weight (DW). Data were analyzed based on total biomass and commercial biomass per plant.

2.2.2. Foliar Pigment Content

The content of chlorophyll, polyphenols (anthocyanins, flavonols) and the nitrogen balance index (NBI®) were measured with DUALEX® (Force-A, Orsay, France) in fully developed leaves in the external position of the plant. Four plants were measured by OTC.

2.2.3. Nutrient Analysis

For nutrient analysis, oven-dried samples from the final harvest were ground in a stainless steel grinder. Elemental composition analysis was performed by an elemental analyzer (TruSpect CHN-S, LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA). Nutrients composition (Mg, Ca, Na, K, Fe, Mn and Zn) was analyzed by an ICP-OES analyzer (5900 ICP-OES, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The analyses were carried out using 150 mg of commercial biomass per plant. Four plants per OTC. The values were expressed as mg/100 g DW.

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using Statistica (TIBCO, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Differences among O3 treatments in physiological parameters were tested through one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A probability level p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p values between 0.05 and 0.1 were discussed as significant trends.

3. Results

3.1. Growing Conditions and Ozone Concentration

The growing conditions in OTC were sunny and warm. The temperature range was 8–21 °C, and the relative humidity was 39–80% (Table 1), while the environmental conditions in the peri-urban crops were warmer and drier in the summer months. The ambient temperature was in the range of 16–33 °C, and the relative humidity was 12–57% (Table 1).
The concentration of ambient ozone recorded in peri-urban crops exceeded the critical level of vegetation protection (3000 ppb·h). Ozone peaks throughout the day were recorded between 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., coinciding with the highest values of temperature and lowest relative humidity throughout the day.

3.2. Visible Injury

The plants of Swiss chard var. Fuenlabrada showed an unspecific discoloration after 25 days of treatment in the OTC. These white spots were more intense in the NF++ treatment. At the end of the experiment, these spots in ozone treatments were less apparent.
In the O3 bioindicator vegetable garden, no visible damage was detected in the chard varieties. Ozone damage was only identified in a variety of sensitive tobacco (Bel W3) (data not shown).

3.3. Biomass

The total production of chard was similar between different treatments. When the marketable production was selected, a significant reduction in the harvest was detected in the ozone treatments (p < 0.01) and a significant increase in non-commercial biomass in NF++ treatment (p < 0.05). The harvest of chard cv. Fuenlabrada was reduced in 30% in the NF++ and 17% in the NF+ treatment compared to the filtered air treatment harvest (Figure 1).

3.4. Pigments Concentrations

Pigment analysis at 25 days of the experiment showed a 15% reduction in chlorophylls in the NF++ treatment (p < 0.01) (data not shown). At the end of the experiment (after 43 days of exposure to different concentrations of ozone), the leaves of plants in NF++ treatment showed a significant reduction of 15% (p < 0.001) in chlorophyll concentration. They also showed a reduction of 15% in the nitrogen index (NIB) (p < 0.01) and an increase of 10% in the concentration of anthocyanins (p < 0.001) in plants exposed to a higher concentration of ozone (NF++), while no differences were obtained in flavonoids (Figure 2). Measurements with “Dualex” in peri-urban crops at different foliar ages showed a significant reduction in flavonoids (p < 0.001) and an increase in NBI in the youngest leaves (p < 0.001), located in the center of the plant.

3.5. Nutrient

The main nutrients in the chard leaves grown in the OTC were K, Na, Mg and Ca (Table 2). At the end of the experiment, a significant reduction in Mg of 25% and Ca (30%) (p < 0.05) was observed in the NF++ treatment plants. Additionally, a non-significant reduction in Mn of 10% and in Zn of 5% was observed in the same treatment. The concentration of K was significantly higher in the plants of the NF++ treatment (p < 0.001) with respect to NF and NF+ but not with respect to FA. The concentration of other nutrients, such as nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P), increased slightly with the increased exposure to ozone (Table 2).
The variation of Mg with respect to the exposure to ozone showed a high correlation with the changes in the concentration of chlorophylls (R2 = 0.9) measured after 43 days of exposure.

4. Discussion

The results of this study in the OTC show that the variety of chard cv. Fuenlabrada cultivated on the outskirts of Madrid can be considered moderately sensitive to ozone. The alteration in the concentration of pigments was detected earlier, with a lower accumulated ozone exposure. As a result, a significant loss of marketable production and an alteration in nutritional quality was measured at the end of the experiment in the plants exposed to high ozone levels.
Usually, leafy crops with visible damage are often not marketable; consequently, the production of leaf crops is reduced where ambient O3 concentration reaches high levels [15,18,36,37]. Yield quality traits are studied in a limited number of crops.
The alterations in pigment concentrations were recorded after ozone exposure in numerous studies [20], and the reduction in chlorophyll was detected in leafy crops [27,28]. These changes were more evident in old leaves and were dependent on the variety studied [37]. Other studies showed a seasonal response [29]. The earlier chlorophyll breakdown could be related to a premature and accelerated senescence due to ozone [21,38]. Enhanced senescence will also reduce photosynthesis and the length of time over which nutrients will be extracted from the soil [39]. The response of increased anthocyanin concentration measured in the plants exposed to high ozone leaves has been linked to the response to oxidative stress.
Chlorophyll reduction is not a specific effect of ozone. A low concentration of chlorophyll is also observed in young leaves. The values obtained from anthocyanins, flavonoids, or NBI index measured with a “Dualex device” could help to discern between the effect of ozone and the age of the leaf. Low values of flavonoid and high-index NBI values (measured with Dualex) were related to less leaf development. This same pattern was observed in tobacco plants grown in the bioindicator garden.
The chlorophyll content in chard leaves was highly correlated (R2 = 0.9) with the concentration of Mg in these plants. Both traits showed a significant reduction in NF++ treatment. These measurements were determined on green leaves without visible symptoms. A lower correlation value was recorded with Ca and Fe. However, an inverse relationship with nitrogen concentration was detected. Plants with a lower concentration of chlorophylls have a higher concentration of nitrogen. However, the differences in N concentration were not significant. The increase in nitrogen with exposure to ozone has been reported in different studies, especially in wheat grains. This means that grain quality is improved with respect to its concentration, but the amount of accumulated proteins and minerals per unit area is reduced, which can have serious effects on human nutrition [39].
Chard has traditionally been used for its health benefits [31,32]. Regarding the mineral content, the abundance of macro elements, such as Mg, Ca or K, and the presence of the microelements Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn, are some of the most interesting aspects of the use of this crop in human nutrition. Mineral deficiency is one of the causes of numerous chronic and degenerative disorders. The consumption of a plate (200 g) of fresh Swiss chards leaves could cover around 20% and 40% of Fe, 100% Mg and 15% of Ca (RDA) (recommended dietary allowance). Exposure to ozone reduces the concentration of Mg, Ca or Fe by 5–20%, causing a reduction in RDA in the diet. A similar reduction in nutrients was recorded in palak when the plants were exposed to ozone in winter, but no differences were recorded in summer [29]. The reductions in Mg, Ca, Fe and Zn were related to the increasing senescence in the exposure of the leaves to ozone [38].
The OTC results in chard cv Fuenlabrada showed that this cultivar was moderately sensitive to ozone. The first effect of ozone (chlorophyll reduction) was detected with the accumulated ozone concentration in the range of 4000 ppb·h (AOT40). A reduction in marketable biomass and a moderate loss of quality was detected with a cumulative ozone concentration of 13,800 ppb·h (AOT40).
Ozone effects were not clearly detected in the field. No visible symptoms or reductions in growth were detected, and pigment concentration values were in the range of healthy plants. Different results could be related to the meteorological conditions and to lower ozone exposures during the growth of the crop. In the OTC facilities, the conditions were milder than in the peri-urban field, where very low relative humidity values were recorded in the summer months, coinciding with the maximum ozone concentration. Drier conditions could reduce the absorption of pollutants [20,21].
The evaluation of O3 pressure on global agriculture should include quality and nutritional aspects with a direct consideration of the potential for adverse health effects and malnutrition associated with the reduced production of proteins and a variety of minerals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.B.-B., S.E., I.G.-F. and J.S.; methodology V.B.-B., S.E., I.G.-F. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.E.; writing—review and editing, S.E.; funding acquisition, V.B.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by Grupo Operativo OZOCAM (PDR-18 2014–2020, funded by FEADER (EU), MAPA (Spain) and Comunidad de Madrid (CAM, Spain) through IMIDRA (CAM); and AGRISOST-CM (P2018/BAA-4330, CAM y Structural Funds 2014-2020 FEDER and FSE).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Jose Mª Camacho; Angel Gonzalez and Ricardo Marquez.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ashmore, M.R. Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 949–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ainsworth, E.A.; Yendrek, C.R.; Sitch, S.; Collins, W.J.; Emberson, L.D. The Effects of Tropospheric Ozone on Net Primary Productivity and Implications for Climate Change. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 637–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cooper, O.R.; Parrish, D.D.; Ziemke, J.; Balashov, N.V.; Cupeiro, M.; Galbally, I.E.; Gilge, S.; Horowitz, L.; Jensen, N.R.; Lamarque, J.-F.; et al. Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: An observation-based review Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 2014, 2, 000029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Monks, P.S.; Archibald, A.T.; Colette, A.; Cooper, O.; Coyle, M.; Derwent, R.; Fowler, D.; Granier, C.; Law, K.S.; Mills, G.E.; et al. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 8889–8973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. DeLang, M.N.; Becker, J.S.; Chang, K.L.; Serre, M.L.; Cooper, O.R.; Schultz, M.G.; Schröder, S.; Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Deushi, M.; et al. Mapping Yearly Fine Resolution Global Surface Ozone through the Bayesian Maximum Entropy Data Fusion of Observations and Model Output for 1990–2017. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 4389–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. European Environment Agency. Air Quality in Europe—2019 Report; Report No 10/2019; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Borge, R.; Requia, W.J.; Yagüe, C.; Jhun, I.; Koutrakis, P. Impact of weather changes on air quality and related mortality in Spain over a 25 year period (1993–2017). Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saiz-Lopez, A.; Borge, R.; Notario, A.; Adame, J.A.; De la Paz, D.; Querol, X.; Artinano, B.; Gómez-Moreno, F.J.; Cuevas, C.A. Unexpected increase in the oxidation capacity of the urban atmosphere of Madrid, Spain. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Querol, X.; Alastuey, A.; Gangoiti, G.; Perez, N.; Lee, H.K.; Eun, H.R.; Park, Y.; Mantilla, E.; Escudero, M.; Titos, G.; et al. Phenomenology of summer ozone episodes over the Madrid Metropolitan Area, central Spain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2018, 18, 6511–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Salvador, P.; Barreiro, M.; Gómez-Moreno, F.J.; Alonso-Blanco, E.; Artíñano, B. Synoptic classification of meteorological patterns and their impact on air pollution episodes and new particle formation processes in a south European air basin. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 245, 118016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Holland, M.; Mills, G.; Hayes, F.; Buse, A.; Emberson, L.; Cambridge, H.; Cinderby, S.; Terry, A.; Ashmore, M. Economic Assessment of Crop Yield Losses from Ozone Exposure; The UNECE International Cooperative Programme on Vegetation. Contract EPG1/3/170; Center for Ecology and Hydrology and UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: Gwynedd, UK, 2002; Volume 1, p. 170. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilkinson, S.; Mills, G.; Illidge, R.; Davies, W.J. How is ozone pollution reducing our food supply? J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mills, G.; Sharps, K.; Simpson, D.; Pleijel, H.; Broberg, M.; Uddling, J.; Jaramillo, F.; Davies, W.J.; Dentener, F.; Berg, M.V.D.; et al. Ozone pollution will compromise efforts to increase global wheat production. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 3560–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tai, A.P.; Sadiq, M.; Pang, J.; Yung, D.H.; Feng, Z. Impacts of Surface Ozone Pollution on Global Crop Yields: Comparing Different Ozone Exposure Metrics and Incorporating Co-effects of CO2. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fumagalli, I.; Gimeno, B.S.; Velissariou, D.; De Temmerman, L.; Mills, G. Evidence of ozone-induced adverse effects on crops in the Mediterranean region. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 2583–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mills, G.; Buse, A.; Gimeno, B.; Bermejo, V.; Holland, M.; Emberson, L.; Pleijel, H. A synthesis of AOT40-based response functions and critical levels of ozone for agricultural and horticultural crops. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 2630–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fagnano, M.; Maggio, A.; Fumagalli, I. Crops’ responses to ozone in Mediterranean environments. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1438–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Booker, F.; Muntifering, R.; McGrath, M.; Burkey, K.; Decoteau, D.; Fiscus, E.; Manning, W.; Krupa, S.; Chappelka, A.; Grantz, D. The ozone component of global change: Potential effects on agricultural and horticultural plant yield, product quality and interactions with invasive species. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2009, 51, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fuhrer, J.; Martin, M.V.; Mills, G.; Heald, C.L.; Harmens, H.; Hayes, F.; Sharps, K.; Bender, J.; Ashmore, M.R. Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 8785–8799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ainsworth, E.A. Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. Plant J. 2016, 90, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Emberson, L.D.; Pleijel, H.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Berg, M.V.D.; Ren, W.; Osborne, S.; Mills, G.; Pandey, D.; Dentener, F.; Bueker, P.; et al. Ozone effects on crops and consideration in crop models. Eur. J. Agron. 2018, 100, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Velissariou, D. Toxic Effects and Losses of Commercial Value of Lettuce and Other Vegetables Due to Photochemical Air Pollution in Agricultural Areas of Attica, Greece. Critical Levels for Ozone—Level II; Swiss Agency for Environment, Forest and Landscape: Bern, Switzerland, 1999; pp. 253–256. [Google Scholar]
  23. Oshima, R.; Taylor, O.; Cardiff, E. Possible new toxicant indicated in severe air pollution episode in south coast basin. Calif. Agric. 1974, 28, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  24. Goumenaki, E.; Barnes, J. Impacts of tropospheric ozone on growth and photosynthesis of lettuce. Acta Hortic. 2009, 817, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Temple, P.J.; Jones, T.E.; Lennox, R.W. Yield loss assessments for cultivars of broccoli, lettuce, and onion exposed to ozone. Environ. Pollut. 1990, 66, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Calatayud, A.; Iglesias, D.J.; Talón, M.; Barreno, E. Effects of 2-month ozone exposure in spinach leaves on photosynthesis, antioxidant systems and lipid peroxidation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Calatayud, A.; Barreno, E. Response to ozone in two lettuce varieties on chlorophyll a fluorescence, photosynthetic pigments and lipid peroxidation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004, 42, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goumenaki, E.; Fernandez, I.G.; Papanikolaou, A.; Papadopoulou, D.; Askianakis, C.; Kouvarakis, G.; Barnes, J. Derivation of ozone flux-yield relationships for lettuce: A key horticultural crop. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 146, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tiwari, S.; Agrawal, M.; Marshall, F.M. Seasonal variations in adaptational strategies of Beta vulgaris L. plants in response to ambient air pollution: Biomass allocation, yield and nutritional quality. Trop. Ecol. 2010, 51, 353–363. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kumari, S.; Agrawal, M.; Tiwari, S. Impact of elevated CO2 and elevated O3 on Beta vulgaris L.: Pigments, metabolites, antioxidants, growth and yield. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 174, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gamba, M.; Raguindin, P.F.; Asllanaj, E.; Merlo, F.; Glisic, M.; Minder, B.; Bussler, W.; Metzger, B.; Kern, H.; Muka, T. Bioactive compounds and nutritional composition of Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. var. cicla and flavescens): A systematic review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 3465–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ninfali, P.; Angelino, D. Nutritional and functional potential of Beta vulgaris cicla and rubra. Fitoterapia 2013, 89, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Loera, R.D.C.; Morales, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Cámara, M.; Marqués, C.D.; Pardo-De-Santayana, M.; Tardío, J. Wild vegetables of the Mediterranean area as valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2012, 59, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mzoughi, Z.; Chahdoura, H.; Chakroun, Y.; Cámara, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Morales, P.; Mosbah, H.; Flamini, G.; Snoussi, M.; Majdoub, H. Wild edible Swiss chard leaves (Beta vulgaris L. var. cicla): Nutritional, phytochemical composition and biological activities. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mills, G.; Harmens, H.; Hayes, F.; Pleijel, H.; Büker, P.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, I. (Eds.) Mapping Critical Levels for Vegetation. In Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Modelling and Mapping Critical Loads and Levels and Air Pollution Effects, Risks and Trends; Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution; Umwelbundesamt: Berlin, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. Marzuoli, R.; Finco, A.; Chiesa, M.; Gerosa, G. A dose-response relationship for marketable yield reduction of two lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars exposed to tropospheric ozone in Southern Europe. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 26249–26258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. González-Fernández, I.; Elvira, S.; Calatayud, V.; Calvo, E.; Aparicio, P.; Sánchez, M.; Alonso, R.; Bermejo, V.B. Ozone effects on the physiology and marketable biomass of leafy vegetables under Mediterranean conditions: Spinach (Spinacia Oleracea L.) and Swiss chard (Beta Vulgaris L. Var. cycla). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 235, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fangmeier, A.; De Temmerman, L.; Black, C.; Persson, K.; Vorne, V. Effects of elevated CO2 and/or ozone on nutrient concentrations and nutrient uptake of potatoes. Eur. J. Agron. 2002, 17, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Broberg, M.C.; Feng, Z.; Xin, Y.; Pleijel, H. Ozone effects on wheat grain quality—A summary. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 197, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Swiss chard (a) commercial biomass (g dry weight plant−1); (b) total biomass:commercial ratio. Values are means ± standard errors for ozone treatments. Charcoal filter air (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus 20 ppb ozone (NFA+) and ambient plus 40 ppb ozone (NFA++).
Figure 1. Swiss chard (a) commercial biomass (g dry weight plant−1); (b) total biomass:commercial ratio. Values are means ± standard errors for ozone treatments. Charcoal filter air (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus 20 ppb ozone (NFA+) and ambient plus 40 ppb ozone (NFA++).
Blsf 11 00016 g001
Figure 2. (a) The content of chlorophyll, (b) anthocyanins, (c) flavonoids and (d) the nitrogen balance index (NBI) was measured with a Dualex device inside the OTC and in the peri-urban field. Values are means ± standard errors for ozone treatments. The ozone treatments are: air with carbon filter (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus ozone 20 ppb (NFA+) and ambient plus ozone 40 ppb (NFA++). Those measured in the field were classified according to the age and position of the leaf. E = external, I = internal and C = center.
Figure 2. (a) The content of chlorophyll, (b) anthocyanins, (c) flavonoids and (d) the nitrogen balance index (NBI) was measured with a Dualex device inside the OTC and in the peri-urban field. Values are means ± standard errors for ozone treatments. The ozone treatments are: air with carbon filter (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus ozone 20 ppb (NFA+) and ambient plus ozone 40 ppb (NFA++). Those measured in the field were classified according to the age and position of the leaf. E = external, I = internal and C = center.
Blsf 11 00016 g002
Table 1. Environmental growing conditions and ozone exposure in OTC and a peri-urban field. Charcoal filter air (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus 20 ppb ozone (NFA+) and ambient plus 40 ppb ozone (NFA++).
Table 1. Environmental growing conditions and ozone exposure in OTC and a peri-urban field. Charcoal filter air (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus 20 ppb ozone (NFA+) and ambient plus 40 ppb ozone (NFA++).
YearOzone Exposure (Days) (O3 ppb) a-AOT 40 (ppb·h)
OTC FANFANFA+NFA++RH (%) aT (°C) a
201925(17)-0(36)-1869(42)-4084(49.5)-7158
43(17)-0(36)-3550(42)-8075(49.5)-138095916
Peri-Urban Field Environmental O3 Concentration
Summer (JJA) (38)-10459 2925
43 (40)-5840 2525.5
T: air temperature; RH: air relative humidity; (O3 ppb): ozone concentration; AOT40: accumulated ozone concentration over 40 ppb during daylight hours. a Averages 24 h.
Table 2. p-values of ozone effects on nutrient levels and nutrient concentrations (mg/100 g DW) in commercials leaves after 43 days of exposition to different ozone treatments. Values are means ± standard errors for ozone treatments. The letters denote differences between ozone treatments in the post hoc tests n.s. = not significant. The ozone treatments are: air with carbon filter (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus ozone 20 ppb (NFA+) and ambient plus ozone 40 ppb (NFA+).
Table 2. p-values of ozone effects on nutrient levels and nutrient concentrations (mg/100 g DW) in commercials leaves after 43 days of exposition to different ozone treatments. Values are means ± standard errors for ozone treatments. The letters denote differences between ozone treatments in the post hoc tests n.s. = not significant. The ozone treatments are: air with carbon filter (FA), ambient (NFA), ambient plus ozone 20 ppb (NFA+) and ambient plus ozone 40 ppb (NFA+).
FactorNMgCaKNaPFeMnZnCu
O3n.s.0.020.030.01n.s.n.s.n.s.n.sn.s.n.s.
FA3482 ± 1601370 ± 57 a877 ± 66 a 3690 ± 137 ab3500 ± 135256 ± 1721 ± 2.417 ± 0.99.16 ± 0.392.59 ± 0.20
NFA3336 ± 1711229 ± 105 b770 ± 91 a3145 ± 163 b3636 ± 164240 ± 7.618 ± 1.818 ± 1.19.77 ± 0.662.44 ± 0.22
NFA+3354 ± 1901236 ± 127 b727 ± 106 ab3160 ± 231 b3727 ± 201253 ± 2119 ± 1.316 ± 1.58.63 ± 0.912.37 ± 0.19
NFA++3836 ± 200960 ± 60 b541 ± 38 b3836 ± 143 a3240 ± 93 287 ± 1517 ± 0.915 ± 1.28.45 ± 0.532.75 ± 0.17
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elvira, S.; Sanz, J.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, I.; Bermejo-Bermejo, V. Ozone Effects on the Quality of Swiss Chard. Peri-Urban Crops a Case Study. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 11, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-12016

AMA Style

Elvira S, Sanz J, Gonzalez-Fernandez I, Bermejo-Bermejo V. Ozone Effects on the Quality of Swiss Chard. Peri-Urban Crops a Case Study. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2022; 11(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-12016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elvira, Susana, Javier Sanz, Ignacio Gonzalez-Fernandez, and Victoria Bermejo-Bermejo. 2022. "Ozone Effects on the Quality of Swiss Chard. Peri-Urban Crops a Case Study" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 11, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-12016

APA Style

Elvira, S., Sanz, J., Gonzalez-Fernandez, I., & Bermejo-Bermejo, V. (2022). Ozone Effects on the Quality of Swiss Chard. Peri-Urban Crops a Case Study. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 11(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-12016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop