Next Article in Journal
Diversity and Seasonality of Aquatic Beetles (Coleoptera) in Three Localities of the State of Tlaxcala, Central Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Small Indigenous Fish: A Potential Source of Valuable Nutrients in the Context of Bangladesh
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Approach for Managing Landscapes for a Variety of Ecosystem Services in Prespa Lakes Watershed
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Hydrobiology
Volume 2
Issue 1
10.3390/hydrobiology2010015
hydrobiology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Importance of EU Integration for Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in Transboundary Protected Areas (TPAs) in the Western Balkan

by
Aleko Miho
1,*,
Jani Marka
1 and
Zenel Krasniqi
2
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tirana, Bulevardi Zogu I, 25/1, 1057 Tiranë, Albania
2
Faculty of Education, University “Hasan Prishtina”, Rr. “Agim Ramadani”, 10 000 Pristina, Kosovo
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrobiology 2023, 2(1), 235-243; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010015
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 24 February 2023 / Accepted: 25 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Building Resilience of Water Ecosystems through Scientific Knowledge)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There are many important protected areas in the Western Balkan region, which are shared between Albania, Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Greece. These areas have special importance based on their species density (mosses and higher plants) per surface unit. These transboundary ecosystems, which include mountainous massifs, lakes, and rivers, are biodiversity hotspots for the whole of Europe. Species and habitat densities are high compared to other countries in Southeast Europe. However, political borders fragment properly across two or three countries, which often have different approaches and rules for nature protection and the use of resources. Hence, in this short opinion piece, we stress common and cooperative transboundary protection and management in these countries. Furthermore, the European Union’s policy towards the Western Balkan countries in the Stabilization and Association Process (SAP), with the goal of their eventual EU membership, is crucial. Therefore, our appeal is addressed not only to the respective local communities and national governments but also to the European Commission and related EU institutions. We stress the importance of these cross-border ecosystems in the integration process.

1. Broken Nature in the Western Balkan Region

Transboundary protected areas (TPAs) in the Western Balkan (WB) region are shared between Albania, Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Greece. They are well-known hotspots of biodiversity [1,2]. They include the Albanian alps (also known as Bjeshket e Nemuna or Prokletije), divided between Albania, Kosovo, and Montenegro; Shkodra/Buna (Skadar/Bojana), divided between Albania and Montenegro; Sharri (Scardus), Korab-Koritnik and Shebenik-Jabllanice, divided between Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Albania; Ohrid and Prespa Lakes, divided between North Macedonia, Albania and Greece (Prespa); and the Vjosa (Aoos) river, divided between Albania and Greece. Hence, these TPAs are fragmented by political borders across two or three countries, which often have different approaches and rules for nature protection and the use of natural resources. There are also different protection criteria in each country, different histories, and, of course, even different local names. The most important TPAs are listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 1.
According to the data presented in Table 1, Albania is the country richest in TPAs, which covers more than 13% of Albanian territory, followed then by Kosovo (10.68%), North Macedonia (8.51%), Montenegro (4.1%) and Greece (0.68%).
Shkodra/Skadar Lake is partly protected as an NP (II) and RS in Montenegro, but it is protected as an MNR (IV) and RS in Albania. Buna/Bojana River-Velipoja is protected as an LP (V) and RS only in the Albanian part. Only Ulcinj Salina in the Montenegrin part of the Buna/Bojana delta is designated as an MNR and RS, which occurred recently (https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/2399, accessed on 4 August 2019). The Prespa Lakes are protected as NPs (II) and RSs in Albania and Greece, and as an RS in North Macedonia (Figure 1).
The Albanian Alps (Bjeshket e Nemuna/Prokletije) constitute a cross-border massif of the Dinaric Alps between Kosovo, Albania, and Montenegro. In Kosovo, they have been protected as NPs since 2012, while the rest of the massif in Montenegro is also protected as an NP (2009) [4]. Meanwhile, the Albanian government recently designated the entire Albanian part of the Albanian Alps as an NP [5], including Bjeshket e Nemuna in Albania, the former Valbona Valley and Thethi NPs, and the Gashi River Reserve. We applaud this action and hope that it will help in further protecting the whole massif as a unique ecosystem, in close cooperation with Kosovo and Montenegro (Figure 1).
The Sharr (Scardus/Šar) Mountains are historically protected as NPs in Kosovo; the part of the mountains lying in North Macedonia was declared an NP in June 2021 [6]. In the south of the Sharr Mountains is the massif of Mavrovo NP in North Macedonia; while the massifs Korab-Koritnik extend into Albania, where they are protected as an MNR (IV). The Shebenik-Jabllanice, further south, is protected as an NP (Figure 1).
The whole Vjosa River Valley was recently designated an MNR (IV) by the Albanian government [7]. Furthermore, a working group led by the Ministry of Tourism and Environment has begun planning for the establishment of the Wild Vjosa River and its most important tributaries as an NP in Albania [8]; hopefully, it will be inaugurated in March 2023. Vjosa River is in ecological continuity with Vjosa Delta-Narta Lagoon LP (V) and Hotova Fir-Dangelli NP in Albania, and the Vikos-Aoos and Pindos NPs in Greece (Figure 1).

2. Biodiversity Hot Spots

2.1. Hot Spots in Mosses

The areas around the Mediterranean and the Black Sea harbor particularly high biodiversity, with many rare and endangered plant species and habitats [9,10]. The abovementioned Western Balkan TPAs are particularly distinguished in this capacity. However, we do not make an overview of natural and biodiversity values here; rather, we discuss only some significant examples related to our research fields to show the importance of this region and the transboundary areas on conservation and sustainable management.
It is worth noting that the areas listed in Table 1 have attracted the interest of scientists at least since the second half of the last century. Their high biodiversity is due to their geographical position, origin, climate, etc.; together, they form variegated habitats where a rich living world is housed, including mosses that are important precursors of habitat formation.
In his PhD thesis, Krasniqi reported data on mosses (Bryophytes) from Kosovo, focusing mainly on two important protected areas: the Sharr and Bjeshket e Nemuna NPs [11].In this study, a total of 259 moss taxa were reported; 57 were newly reported mosses in Kosovo. There are ca. 360 total known moss species in Kosovo, with a density of 33 species/1000 km2 (see Table 2). Of these, 168 species (or 47%) belong to the red list of mosses of Europe or the red lists of different Balkan countries [12].
The moss species density in four WB countries (Ko, Al, Me, and Mk in Table 2) is higher than in other countries in Southeast Europe. Meanwhile, there are only 1539 known moss species in Europe, with a modest density of only 0.2 species/1000 km2. The richness and diversity of mosses are mainly due to the presence of transboundary protected areas. For instance, for Kosovo, moss diversity is mainly due to the two mentioned mountainous massifs: the Sharri NP with a total of 255 known species, and the Bjeshket e Nemuna NP with a total of 239 species. Therefore, species richness and the harboring of rare and endangered moss species are quite evident in these TPAs.

2.2. Hot Spots in Other Vegetal Groups

There are about 3000 species of vascular plants in Kosovo, with up to 275 species/1000 km2, while ca. 10% are threatened [13,14]. There are known already to be ca. 3650 vascular plant species in Albania [15], with 130 species/1000 km2. There are ca. 3350 vascular plant species in North Macedonia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flora_of_North_Macedonia, accessed on 6 June 2020), with ca. 130 species/km2. Meanwhile, for the whole European continent, Silva et al. reported up to 12,500 vascular plant species, with only 1.2 species/1000 km2 [9].
Here, the contribution of the mentioned transboundary NPs is quite relevant. For example, around 1000 vascular plants have been reported in Bjeshket e Nemuna NP in Kosovo, with 126 rare and endangered species [16]; ca. 1558 plant species have been reported in Sharri NP, with 107 species on the red list of Kosovo [17]. Furthermore, Hashani reported 997 plant species for the transboundary areas of Koritnik, Vraça, and Oshlak, which are in Kosovo as well [18]. As for North Macedonia, in his PhD thesis on the flora and vegetation of Sharri Mountain (North Macedonian part), Abdi reported about 2000 plant taxa, with ca. 460 rare or endangered species [19]. The flora of the Albanian Alps is considerably rich; to date, more than 1630 plant species have been reported (about 45% of Albanian flora), along with more than 20 habitats of international conservation interest [20].
Experts of the Hellenic Botanical Society (HBS)report that the vascular flora of Greece comprises 5927 species [21], or around 50 species/1000 km2.Around 1800 vascular plant taxa have been recorded respectively in the Prespa National Park [22], and in the Vikos-Aoos National Park (NW Greece), many of them rare and unique to the area (https://carpediemeire.com/2020/05/17/vikos-aoos-national-park/, accessed on 14 December 2022).
In the Ohrid and Prespa lakes and their watersheds, Levkov and Williams reported 919 diatoms: 789 taxa from Ohrid, with 117 endemics, and 244 taxa from Prespa, with 33 endemics [23]. For Lake Shkodra/Skadar, 930 species of algae and 497 vascular plant species have been reported; additionally, there are up to 1900 taxa of vascular plants in the whole Shkodra watershed [1].
Vjosa/Aoos has recently been considered a riverine ecosystem of European significance due to its biodiversity, hydromorphology, and sediment transport, as reported in several recent studies [24,25]. About 1430 plant and animal species are known to exist in the Albanian part of the Vjosa River; 39 species are endangered according to the IUCN, 148 are listed in Annex 1–3 of the Berne Convention, 41 are in the Bird Directive and 78 are in the Habitats Directive [26].

3. Ethnic Richness vs. Generous Biodiversity in Nature

These Western Balkan countries are also rich in history, ethnic groups, languages, religions, folklore, etc. The area has been a crossroads of many cultures and religions, where Bulgars and Slavs, Orthodox Christians, Catholics, and Muslims have long met [27]. Over centuries, different empires have left their traces, such as the Roman, Byzantine, Bulgarian, Ottoman, and Austro-Hungarian. Today’s states were formed in the last centuries, with more or less sharp political borders. We, humans, must be inspired by the generosity of nature and the coexistence of species and habitats that these natural areas offer. Along with the data discussed above on the species density of mosses and vascular plants, let us bring another example from the microscopic world; in a periphyton sample or a few drops of the related cleaned material from the Ohrid Lakeshore in Tushemishti (Pogradeci) more than 150 species of diatoms were found, including species new to science [28,29].
Natural richness and generosity have helped the survival of local ethnicities, providing food, clothing, health, and shelter, but have also provided protection from invasions over the centuries. The Shkodra/Skadar and Ohrid towns are the most ancient settlements of the Western Balkans. All the areas mentioned in Table 1 are commonly visited nowadays; they offer opportunities in all aspects of life and leisure, such as bathing, boating, fishing, hiking and climbing, skiing, hunting, traditional cuisine, etc. Many visitors enjoy a trip to Shkodra/Skadar, Ohrid, and Prespa areas, in the Valbona, Shala, Cemi or Vjosa/Aoos river valleys, in the Šar/Scardus/Sharr, Korabi, Galičica or Pelister mountains, etc. The local flora is also important to household medicine and food security [19,20,30,31]. These are but a few examples.
However, this natural wealth does not seem to align with the well-being of nations; as a whole, the region remains the poorest in Europe. Internal problems, either inherited from history or recently formed, hold the economy and development hostage, and often even affect fruitful cross-border cooperation. In many cases, these problems have caused negative pressure and impacts on the preservation of natural and biological values, including in TPAs. For instance, it is worth mentioning the construction of tourist infrastructure even in the most sensitive areas, deforestation, poor land use, and fires [1,30]. Furthermore, negative impacts from agriculture, fishing, and aquaculture, and overexploitation or unsustainable harvesting of medicinal and aromatic plants have also been reported for Albania and North Macedonia [31,32,33]. Finally, the construction of hydropower plants (HPPs) over the last decade has had a large impact on hundreds of rivers, including the Valbona river NP [30,34,35]. These problems may have negative consequences for each country, quality of life, and the climate, and may require costly restorative measures for future generations. The recent EU 2022 Enlargement Package reported moderate or limited progress in the areas of environment and climate change, especially for Albania and Kosovo [36].

4. Transboundary Protection of Unique Ecosystems Is Needed

Richness in habitats and plant and animal species is an important resource, from both natural and economic perspectives. However, it also implies the responsibility to continuously preserve nature, habitats, and wildlife. Careful use, preservation, and continuous restoration are the responsibilities of each neighboring country, alongside the need to work in close cooperation with each other and with international experts and institutions. This also means that ecosystem services must be always properly considered, as recognized by EU policy and international environmental conventions on the environment.
Hence, we emphasize the importance of common transboundary protection and management of unique ecosystems. Permanent common efforts would help to better preserve these valuable ecosystems. TPAs can serve as bridges of cooperation for research and allow countries to join forces in protection and restoration measures. EU integration is crucial in joint plans for sustainable cross-border development in tourism, forestry, agriculture and livestock, medicinal plants, handicrafts, hunting, tourism, etc.
These joint efforts started after the 1990s in WB countries, e.g., for Prespa Lakes and the related Prespa NPs [37,38,39], divided between Albania, Greece, and North Macedonia; for the Ohrid, divided between Albania and North Macedonia [40]; and for the Shkodra Lake basin, divided between Albania and Montenegro [41]. Recently, efforts have been made to promote transboundary cooperation for the Vjosa/Aoos wild river NP in Greece and Albania [42]. Nevertheless, these cooperations have been relatively sporadic and often short in duration, along with facing various other challenges.
In our opinion, the respective WB countries should proactively engage with each other to tackle eventual problems and embrace a better environmental approach for sustainable development and growth. We stress the importance of socio-ecological studies and close cooperation between the academic world, decision-makers, and investors in environmental sustainability. The quality of knowledge of all actors and the Science–Policy interface is crucial in properly solving environmental problems and balancing development with the conservation of natural resources [25,43].
In this transboundary context, we agree that ethnic richness can play an important role through the traditional use of natural resources [31,33] and can support transboundary nature conservation. Moreover, this richness is also crucial to rise above ethnic controversies whenever they exist. Many examples in Europe and the world show that political borders, whenever they are established or strengthened, not only obstruct the mutual development and growth of each country but also lead to the misuse or harm of shared natural resources.
In this context, the European Union’s policy and the Stabilization and Association Process (SAP) are crucial [36]. Our appeal is addressed not only to the respective national governments in the SAP process but also to the European Commission and related EU institutions, which should consider the importance of the unified protection of these cross-border ecosystems in the integration process. Gardin confirms ‘the experience of the international Prespa Park may serve as an experimental essay in realizing the integration of marginalized borders of the EU through the environment’ [38]. Joint protection and management of TPAs with high natural value in Western Balkan areas may also lead to a new approach to the self-determination of EU borders in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.; methodology, A.M. and J.M.; validation, A.M., J.M. and Z.K.; formal analysis, A.M.; investigation, J.M. and Z.K.; resources, J.M. and Z.K.; data curation, A.M., J.M. and Z.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M.; visualization, A.M. and J.M.; supervision, A.M. and J.M.; project administration, none; funding acquisition, none. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The manuscript is ethically sound and meets industry-recognized standards that are reflected in MDPI policies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miho, A.; Kashta, L.; Beqiraj, S. Between the Land and the Sea—Ecoguide to Discover the Transitional Waters of Albania; Julvin 2: Tiranë, Albania, 2013; 462p, ISBN 978-9928-137-27-2. Available online: http://37.139.119.36:81/publikime_shkencore/ALB-LAG-WEB-PDF/000-Albanian-Lagoons-Content.htm (accessed on 14 December 2022).
  2. Fremuth, W. (Ed.) Albania Guide to its Natural Treasures; Herwig Klemp/ECAT: Tirana, Albania, 2000; 140p, ISBN 3-931323-06-4. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266265341_Albania_Guide_to_it’s_Natural_Treasures (accessed on 1 January 2000).
  3. Burhenne-Guilmin, F. Guidelines for Protected Areas Legislation; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2011; p. 147. ISBN 9782831712451. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jankovic, M.; Jaksic-Stojanovic, A.; Vukilić, B.; Seric, N.; Ibrahimi, A. Branding of protected areas and National Parks: A case study of Montenegro. Afr. J. Hosp. Tour. Leis. 2019, 9, 2223–2814X. Available online: https://www.ajhtl.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_6_vol_8_2__2019.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2022).
  5. VKM/DCM59. Për Miratimin e Ndryshimit të Statusit dhe të Sipërfaqes së Ekosistemeve Natyrore Park Kombëtar (Kategoria II) të Zonave të Mbrojtura Mjedisore. Available online: https://akzm.gov.al/vendim-i-keshillit-te-ministrave-nr-59-date-26-1-2022-per-miratimin-e-ndryshimit-te-statusit-dhe-te-siperfaqes-se-ekosistemeve-natyrore-park-kombetar-kategoria-ii-te-zonave-te-mbrojtura-mjedisore/ (accessed on 4 October 2022).
  6. Coбраниeтo Гo Усвoи Зaкoнoт Co Кoј Шap Планина Cтанува Hациoнален Парк/Sobranieto Go Usvoi Zakonot So Koj Šar Planina Stanuva Nacionalen Park. Сакам Да Кажам. (In Macedonian). Available online: https://sdk.mk/index.php/makedonija/sobranieto-go-usvoi-zakonot-so-koj-shar-planina-stanuva-natsionalen-park/ (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  7. VKM/DCM 60. Për Shpalljen e Ekosistemeve Natyrore Rezervat Natyror i Menaxhuar/Park Natyror (Kategoria IV), Si dhe Miratimin e Ndryshimit të Statusit e të Sipërfaqeve Ekzistuese të Zonave të Mbrojtura Mjedisore, Që i Përkasin Kësaj Kategorie. Available online: https://akzm.gov.al/vendim-nr-60-date-26-1-2022-per-shpalljen-e-ekosistemeve-natyrore-rezervat-natyror-i-menaxhuar-park-natyror-kategoria-iv-si-dhe-miratimin-e-ndryshimit-te-statusit-e-te-siperfaqeve-ekzistuese-te-z/ (accessed on 4 October 2022).
  8. Nis Puna për Shpalljen e Vjosës Park Kombëtar. Available online: https://www.cna.al/kulture/nis-puna-per-shpalljen-e-vjoses-park-kombetar-30-eksperte-te-huaj-e-vend-i331360 (accessed on 8 October 2022).
  9. Silva, P.J.; Toland, J.; Jones, W.; Eldrige, J.; Thorpe, E.; Campbell, M.; O’Hara, E. LIFE and Endangered Plants: Conserving Europe’s Threatened Flora; European Commission, Environment Directorate-General (LIFE Unit—E.4): Brussels, Belgium, 2008; pp. 23–30. ISSN 1725-5619. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/life/publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/documents/plants.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2022). [CrossRef]
  10. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.; Mittermeier, C.; Da Fonseca, G.A.; Kent, J. Biodiversity hot spots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krasniqi, Z. Studimi i Myshqeve Brenda Territorit të Kosovës, Vështrim Taksonomik dhe Ekologjik. Ph.D. Thesis, University Of Tirana, Tirana, Albania, 2021; pp. 109–112. Available online: https://api.fshn.edu.al/uploads/Zenel_Krasniqi_Doktorature_Biologji_e90b46cff0.pdf (accessed on 26 November 2021).
  12. Hodgetts, N.; Lockhart, N. Checklist and Country Status of European Bryophytes—Update 2020; Irish Wildlife Manuals, 123; National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Ireland: Gaeltacht, Ireland, 2020; 223p, ISSN 1393–6670. Available online: https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/IWM123.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  13. Millaku, F.; Rexhepi, F.; Krasniqi, E.; Pajazitaj, Q.; Mala, X.; Berisha, N. The Red Book of Vascular Flora of the Republic of Kosovo; MMPH (MESP): Prishtina, Kosovo, 2013; ISBN 978-9951-638-02-9/978-9951-638-03-6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Berisha, N.; Krasniqi, E.; Millaku, F. A quantitative approach for conservation of endangered and endemic plants from Kosovo, SE Europe. Folia Oecologica 2020, 47, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vangjeli, J. Flora ekskursioniste e Shqipërisë; Albanian Academy of Sciences: Tirana, Albania, 2021; 707p, ISBN 9789928339362. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning. Raport për Gjendjen e Natyrës 2010–2014; Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning: Prishtina, Kosovo, 2015; 130p. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20160910075813/http://www.ammk-rks.net/repository/docs/Raporti_i_Natyres_2010-2014_web.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2016).
  17. Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning. Parku Kombëtar “Sharri”—Plani Hapësinor; Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning: Prishtina, Kosovo, 2013; 177p. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20160817032536/http://mmph-rks.org/repository/docs/1._070813_PHPK_Sharri_shq._908833.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2018).
  18. Hashani, Z. Roli i Substratit në Diferencimin dhe Përhapjen e Florës Ndërkufitare: Mali i Koritnikut, Mali i Sharrit dhe Mali i Oshlakut. Ph.D. Thesis, University Of Tirana, Tirana, Albania, 2015; 181p. Available online: https://api.fshn.edu.al/uploads/Doktoratura_ZEQIR_HASHANI_Biologji_2162d24653.pdf (accessed on 19 November 2015).
  19. Abdi, N. Flora dhe Bimësia e Malit të Sharrit. Ph.D. Thesis, University Of Tirana, Tirana, Albania, 2017; 170p. Available online: https://api.fshn.edu.al/uploads/ABDII_Ph_D_2017_9bbebea700.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2017).
  20. Shuka, L.; Mullaj, A.; Hoda, P.; Kashta, L.; Miho, A. Overview of the flora and vegetation of the Albanian Alps—The degree of conservation and threats. In Proceedings of the EADSVE—37th Meeting, Prizren, Kosovo, 13–16 July 2017; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318561194_Overview_of_the_flora_and_vegetation_of_the_Albanian_Alps_-_the_degree_of_conservation_and_threats (accessed on 16 July 2017).
  21. Dimopoulos, P.; Raus, T.; Bergmeier, E.; Constantinidis, T.; Iatrou, G.; Kokkini, S.; Strid, A.; Tzanoudakis, D. Vascular plants of Greece: An annotated checklist. Supplement. Willdenowia 2016, 46, 301–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Strid, A.; Bergmeier, E.; Fotiadis, G. Flora and Vegetation of the Prespa National Park, Greece; Flora of Greece—New Project: The Vegetation of Greece—The Nature of Prespa; Society for the Protection of Prespa: Aghios Germanos, Greece, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Levkov, Z.; Williams, M.D. Checklist of diatoms (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Ohrid and Lake Prespa (Macedonia), and their watersheds. Phytotaxa 2012, 45, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. der ZoologischBotanischen Gesellschaft in Österreich. The Vjosa in Albania—A riverine ecosystem of European significance. Acta ZooBot Austria 2018, 155, 377–385. Available online: https://balkanrivers.net/sites/default/files/Acta155-1_Web_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 27 March 2018).
  25. Schiemer, F.; Beqiraj, S.; Drescher, A.; Graf, W.; Egger, G.; Essl, F.; Frank, T.; Hauer, C.; Hohensinner, S.; Miho, A.; et al. The Vjosa River corridor: A model of natural hydro-morphodynamics and a hotspot of highly threatened ecosystems of European significance. Landsc. Ecol. 2020, 35, 953–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Meulenbroek, P.; Egger, G.; Trautner, J.; Drescher, A.; Randl, M.; Hammerschmied, U.; Wilfling, O.; Schabuss, M.; Zornig, H.; Graf, W. The river Vjosa—A baseline survey on biodiversity, potential impacts, and legal framework for hydropower development. Univ. Nat. Resour. Life Sci. 2020, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goldstein, I. Croatia: A History; McGill-Queen’s University Press: Montreal, QC, Canada, 1999; 300p, Available online: https://archive.org/details/croatia00ivog/page/n12/mode/1up (accessed on 30 August 2013).
  28. Miho, A.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Considerations onbiodiversity and trophic state of Lake Ohrid (Albanian part) from microscopic algae point of view. J. Environ. Ecol. (JEPE) 2003, 4, 543–549. [Google Scholar]
  29. Miho, A.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Diversity of the Genus Placoneis in Lake Ohrid and Other Freshwater Habitats in Albania; Biopress Limited: Bristol, UK, 2006; pp. 301–313. [Google Scholar]
  30. Miho, A. Building activities within protected areas are often unfriendly and unsustainable to wetland conservation—Albanian case. Thalass. Salentina 2018, 40, 91–112. Available online: http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/thalassiasal/article/view/19508/16618 (accessed on 14 December 2022).
  31. Rexhepi, B.; Mustafa, B.; Hajdari, A.; Rushidi-Rexhepi, J.; Cassandra Quave, L.C.; Pieroni, A. Traditional medicinal plant knowledge among Albanians, Macedonians and Gorani in the Sharr Mountains (Republic of Macedonia). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 2055–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. AGT & DSA. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Sector Study—Final; AGT & DSA: Tirana, Albania, 2021; 80p. Available online: https://bujqesia.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/04-MAP-Sector-Study_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 4 December 2021).
  33. Rexhepi, B.; Bajrami, A.; Mustafa, B. Three Ethnic groups, One Territory: Perspectives of an ethnobotanical study from Southwestern Macedonia. Universi Int. J. Educ. Sci. Technol. Innov. Health Environ. 2018, 4, 43–109. [Google Scholar]
  34. Diku, A.; Paparisto, A.; Miho, A.; Bohne, C.; Mahmutaj, E.; Bego, F.; Shuka, L.; Nika, O.; Hoda, P.; Shumka, S. Vështrim i Pavarur Lidhur Me Ndërtimin e HEC-Eve në Luginën e Valbonës. 2016; 23p, Available online: https://peizazhe.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/VALBONA-VESHTRIM-I-PAVARUR-MBI-HEC-et_Prill-2016-draft.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2016).
  35. Çibuku, A. “Të Dëmshme dhe të Padobishme”, Rreth 1100 Hidrocentrale Mbi Lumenjtë e Shqipërisë dhe Bosnje Hercegovinës. Available online: https://citizens-channel.com/2023/01/31/te-demshme-dhe-te-padobishme-rreth-1100-hidrocentrale-mbi-lumenjte-e-shqiperise-dhe-bosnje-hercegovines/ (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  36. European Commission—Enlargement—Stabilization and Association Process 2022. Available online: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/strategy-and-reports_en (accessed on 12 October 2022).
  37. Society for the Protection of Prespa (SPP); WWF-Greece; Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania (PPNEA). Macedonian Alliance for Prespa (MAP) (2005). Strategic Action Plan for the Sustainable Development of the Prespa Park, Executive Summary; Prespa Park: Aghios Germanos, Greece, 2005; 76p, Available online: https://www.spp.gr/sap_executive_summary_edition_en.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2022).
  38. Gardin, J. The Tri-National Prespa Park in Albania, Greece and Macedonia (FYROM): Using Environment to Define the New Boundaries of the European Union. Borders of the European Union: Strategies of Crossing and Resistance. 2007; 23p, Available online: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01170554/document (accessed on 1 July 2015).
  39. Shumka, S.; Miho, A.; Fremuth, W. Zonat e Mbrojtura Ohër-Prespë rrugë e re në Mbrojtjen e Natyrës dhe Zhvillimin në Shqipëri. 2001, pp. 269–273. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/4030616/Zonat_e_mbrojtura_ (accessed on 14 December 2022).
  40. The Drin Core Group (DCG). Lake Ohrid Watershed Management Plan; The Drin Core Group (DCG): Athens, Greece, 2020; 275p, Available online: https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/gwp-med-files/list-of-programmes/gef-drin-project/drin-docs/lake-ohrid-watershed-management-plan.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2020).
  41. Ministry of Tourism and Environment of Montenegro (MoTE); Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water Administration of Albania (MEFWA). The Strategic Action Plan (SAP) for Skadar/Shkodra Lake Albania & Montenegro; Association for Protection of Aquatic Wildlife of Albania (APAWA) & Center for Ecotoxicological Research of Montenegro (CETI) & SNV Montenegro: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2007; 82p. Available online: https://iwlearn.net/resolveuid/b8fab0fe-f54b-4113-814e-850a52eefc04 (accessed on 1 April 2022).
  42. Press Release: Protecting the Aoos-Vjosa River and Its Tributaries. 2022. Available online: https://www.iucn.org/story/202209/press-release-protecting-aoos-vjosa-river-and-its-tributaries (accessed on 7 October 2022).
  43. Miho, A. Importance of socio-ecological research and the science-policy interface in environmental sustainability in Albania. Int. J. Ecosyst. Ecol. Sci. (IJEES) 2023, 13, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hydrobiology 02 00015 g001 550
Figure 1. The most important TPAs of Albania and the neighboring countries of Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Greece (imagery date 14 December 2015). The names on the map are referred to the given names in the Table 1. IUCN management categories [3]: NP, National Park (II IUCN Category); MNR, Managed Nature Reserve (IV); PL, Protected Landscape (V); RS, Ramsar Site; BR, Biosphere Reserve. The maps are elaborated after Google Earth Pro, and the map in https://www.ncafp.org/the-balkans-at-a-crossroads/ (accessed on 14 December 2022).
Figure 1. The most important TPAs of Albania and the neighboring countries of Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Greece (imagery date 14 December 2015). The names on the map are referred to the given names in the Table 1. IUCN management categories [3]: NP, National Park (II IUCN Category); MNR, Managed Nature Reserve (IV); PL, Protected Landscape (V); RS, Ramsar Site; BR, Biosphere Reserve. The maps are elaborated after Google Earth Pro, and the map in https://www.ncafp.org/the-balkans-at-a-crossroads/ (accessed on 14 December 2022).
Hydrobiology 02 00015 g001
Table
Table 1. The most important TPAs of Albania and the neighboring countries of Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Greeceare listed in descending order of year of declaration in the respective countries. IUCN management categories [3]: SR, Strict Reserve (I); NP, National Park (II, IUCN Category); MNR, Managed Nature Reserve (IV); PL, Protected Landscape (V); RS, Ramsar Site; TBR, Transboundary Biosphere Reserve. Data are taken mostly from Wikipedia and other sources cited herein.
Table 1. The most important TPAs of Albania and the neighboring countries of Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Greeceare listed in descending order of year of declaration in the respective countries. IUCN management categories [3]: SR, Strict Reserve (I); NP, National Park (II, IUCN Category); MNR, Managed Nature Reserve (IV); PL, Protected Landscape (V); RS, Ramsar Site; TBR, Transboundary Biosphere Reserve. Data are taken mostly from Wikipedia and other sources cited herein.
Local/English Name, Protection Status
(IUCN Category)		Surface in HectaresYear of Declaration
Albania (13.14% of the territory)
Alpet e Shqiperise/Albanian Alps NP (II) (comprising Valbona Valley NP, Thethi NP, and Gashi River Reserve)82,844.72022
Korab–Koritnik MNR (IV)53,850.02011 & 2022
Lugina e lumit Vjose/Vjosa/Aoos River Valley MNR (IV) 7989.5 2022
Liqeni i Shkodres/Skadar Lake MNR (IV)24,049.82022
Prespa/Prespa watershed NP (II) & RS9424.4 & 15,119.02013
Ohrid-Prespa TBR 94,728.60 2014
Shebenik-Jabllanice NP (II)33,927.72008
Bredhi i Hotoves-Dangelli/Hotova Fir-Dangelli NP (II)34,361.12008
Lumi Bune-Velipoje/Buna/Bojana River-Velipoja LP (V)23,027.02005
Liqeni i Shkodres-Lumi Bunes/Shkodra/Skadar Lake-Buna/Bojana River RS49,562.02005
Butrinti/Butrinti watershed NP (II)8591.22005
Kanali i Cukes-Butrint-Kepi i Stillos/Cuka-Butrinti-Stillo Cape RS13,500.02002
Pogradec/Pogradeci/Ohrid watershed LP (V) 27,323.0 1999
Kosovo (10.68%)
Bjeshket e Nemuna NP (II) 63,028 2012
Malet e Sharrit/Sharr Mountains NP (II) 53,272 2012
Oshlaku SR (I)20.01961
Maja e Arnenit/Arneni Peak SR (I)30.01960
Montenegro (4.1%)
Ulcinj Salina MNR (IV) & RS14772019
Prokletije/Bjeshket e Nemuna NP (II)16,6302009
Skadarsko jezero/Lake Skadar/Shkodra Lake NP (II) & RS40,000 & 20,0001983 & 1995
North Macedonia (8.51%)
Šar/Scardus/Sharr Mountains NP (II)54,2142021
Ohrid-Prespa TBR 94,728.60 2014
Ohridsko Ezero/Liqeni i Ohrit/Lake Ohrid RS25,2052013
Dojransko Ezero RS26962007
Prespansko Ezero/Liqeni i Prespës/Lake Prespa RS18,9201995
Galicica NP (II)22,7001958
Mavrovo NP (II)78,0001949
Pelister NP (II)17,1501948
Greece (0.68%)
Prespes/Mikris Kai Megalis Prespas/Prespa lakes NP (II)21,061/32,4031974/2009
Pindos NP (II)3515/48,3871966/2005
Vikos-Aoos NP (II)95951973
Lake Mikri Prespa/Little Prespa Lake RS50781975
Table
Table 2. Numeric data on total moss species in some countries of SE Europe and related density per 1000 km2. The names and related data from Albania and the neighboring countries, Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Greece are bolded. Kosovo (Ko), Albania (Al), Bulgaria (Bg), Bosnia and Herzegovina (Ba), Greece (El), Croatia (Hr), North Macedonia (Mk), Montenegro (Me), Romania (Ro), Slovenia (Sl), Serbia (Rs), European Turkey (E-Tr), Southeast Europe (Se-Eu), Europe (Eu) [11].
Table 2. Numeric data on total moss species in some countries of SE Europe and related density per 1000 km2. The names and related data from Albania and the neighboring countries, Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Greece are bolded. Kosovo (Ko), Albania (Al), Bulgaria (Bg), Bosnia and Herzegovina (Ba), Greece (El), Croatia (Hr), North Macedonia (Mk), Montenegro (Me), Romania (Ro), Slovenia (Sl), Serbia (Rs), European Turkey (E-Tr), Southeast Europe (Se-Eu), Europe (Eu) [11].
CountriesKoAlMeMkRsElBaBgHrRoSlE-TrSe-EuEu
Species3594595553455565254627194767496402178991539
Species/1000 km23316401374968332920.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miho, A.; Marka, J.; Krasniqi, Z. Importance of EU Integration for Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in Transboundary Protected Areas (TPAs) in the Western Balkan. Hydrobiology 2023, 2, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010015

AMA Style

Miho A, Marka J, Krasniqi Z. Importance of EU Integration for Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in Transboundary Protected Areas (TPAs) in the Western Balkan. Hydrobiology. 2023; 2(1):235-243. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miho, Aleko, Jani Marka, and Zenel Krasniqi. 2023. "Importance of EU Integration for Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in Transboundary Protected Areas (TPAs) in the Western Balkan" Hydrobiology 2, no. 1: 235-243. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010015

APA Style

Miho, A., Marka, J., & Krasniqi, Z. (2023). Importance of EU Integration for Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in Transboundary Protected Areas (TPAs) in the Western Balkan. Hydrobiology, 2(1), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop