Previous Article in Journal
The General Semimartingale Market Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Double Laplace–Adomian Method for Solving Certain Nonlinear Problems in Applied Mathematics

by
Oswaldo González-Gaxiola
Applied Mathematics and Systems Department, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana–Cuajimalpa, Vasco de Quiroga 4871, Mexico City 05348, Mexico
AppliedMath 2025, 5(3), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030098 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 June 2025 / Revised: 27 July 2025 / Accepted: 29 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025

Abstract

The objective of this investigation is to obtain numerical solutions for a variety of mathematical models in a wide range of disciplines, such as chemical kinetics, neurosciences, nonlinear optics, metallurgical separation/alloying processes, and asset dynamics in mathematical finance. This research features numerical simulations conducted with a remarkably low error measure, providing a visual representation of the examined models in these areas. The proposed method is the double Laplace–Adomian decomposition method, which facilitates the numerical acquisition and analysis of solutions. This paper presents the first report of numerical simulations employing this innovative methodology to address these problems. The findings are expected to benefit the natural sciences, mathematical modeling, and their practical applications, representing the innovative aspect of this article. Additionally, this method can analyze many classes of partial differential equations, whether linear or nonlinear, without the need for linearization or discretization.

1. Introduction

Nonlinear ordinary differential equations (NLODEs) or nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) can be used to model a vast majority of nonlinear phenomena in applied mathematics. In the fields of engineering, applied mathematics, and natural sciences, there are a few of these equations that are absolutely necessary, and they can be solved by employing various approaches, whether they are analytical or numerical in nature. Researchers have conducted an enormous number of analytical and numerical studies to find solutions consistent with these problems in general. However, while computational tools make it relatively easy to analyze linear problems, precisely solving nonlinear problems remains a significant challenge. Despite the ongoing advancement of analytical methodologies, multiple disadvantages and limits persist. Nevertheless, certain analytical techniques yield approximate solutions to nonlinear problems, such as perturbation methods [1,2,3,4], homotopy perturbation [5,6,7,8,9,10], Adomian decomposition methods (ADMs) [11,12,13,14,15,16], collocation methods [17,18,19,20], and Laplace–Adomian decomposition methods (LADMs) [21,22,23,24], which are effective for addressing NLODEs and NLPDEs. These methods, while useful, often require careful application and a profound understanding of the underlying mathematics to ensure their effectiveness. Researchers continue to explore and refine these techniques, aiming to enhance their accuracy and expand their applicability across various fields of science and engineering. As advancements in computational power and data analysis techniques emerge, the potential for these methods to revolutionize problem-solving grows even more promising. This ongoing evolution not only offers fresh opportunities for research but also fosters interdisciplinary collaboration, bridging gaps between theoretical and practical applications.
The Thomas equation for chemical kinetics, a version of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, a generalized Boussinesq equation, the Allen–Cahn equation used in materials science, and a nonlinear adaptation of the Black–Scholes equation are examined in this paper. The double Laplace–Adomian decomposition method (DLADM) will be used for the first time to estimate numerical solutions for the mathematical models describing the equations. The suggested technique is a systematic and efficient strategy for solving these nonlinear systems. Its primary benefit is that it enables the numerical computation of solutions without linearization, discretization, perturbation, or any other constraints that may compromise accuracy. This approach not only preserves the integrity of the original equations but also enhances the quality of numerical solutions obtained. As a result, it opens up new avenues for exploring complex phenomena in various areas of mathematical applications, where precision is crucial.
The main novelty of this study is the introduction of a new method called the double Laplace–Adomian decomposition method, which helps solve various mathematical models in several disciplinary fields. The results fuel advances in natural sciences and mathematical modeling, with potential for broad practical and theoretical impact.
The double Laplace–Adomian decomposition method has recently been successfully employed to solve fractional-order NLPDEs in [25,26,27] and for the calculation of electron-acoustic waves for a Korteweg–De Vries equation in [28]. Also in [29], the authors achieved a generalization of the method and applied it to the solution of coupled Sine–Gordon-type equations. These advancements highlight the versatility and effectiveness of the double Laplace–Adomian decomposition method in addressing complex mathematical problems.
We have structured the remainder of this paper as follows. In Section 2, we briefly show the technical requirements related to the double Laplace transform and its properties to address the rest of this manuscript. In Section 3, we present the methodology and the algorithm used in the rest of this article derived from the combination of the ADM with the double Laplace transform. In Section 4, we illustrate the effectiveness, accuracy, and efficiency of the proposed methodology by providing numerical solutions to examples derived from various scientific fields. In the final Section 5 of this article, we discuss the conclusions drawn from the entire study.

2. Technical Prerequisites

This section reviews the fundamental definitions and basic properties of the Laplace transform and the double Laplace transform. The double Laplace transform extends the concept of the standard Laplace transform, allowing for the analysis of functions of two variables. This powerful tool is particularly useful in solving partial differential equations (PDEs), providing a way to handle complex time-dependent behaviors. Furthermore, we will briefly review the key steps of the widely recognized Adomian decomposition method, which will be essential in establishing the methodology of our research.

2.1. Laplace Transform: Brief Review

The Laplace transform is a potent mathematical tool that is named after Pierre-Simon, Marquis de Laplace (1749–1827), a French philosopher, mathematician, and astronomer. Although he did not “invent” it in its present form, he made significant contributions to its application, particularly in his research on probability theory [30]. His work laid the groundwork for many modern mathematical techniques, and the Laplace transform itself has become essential in engineering, physics, and control theory, allowing for the simplification of complex differential equations. Today, it is widely used to analyze linear time-invariant systems and solve problems across various scientific disciplines.
Definition 1.
For all real numbers t 0 , the Laplace transform of a function f ( t ) is the function F ( s ) , which is defined by
F ( s ) = L { f ( t ) } = 0 e s t f ( t ) d t ,
whenever the improper integral exists. In general s is a complex number.
Definition 2.
If the Laplace transform of f ( t ) is F ( s ) = L { f ( t ) } , then the inverse Laplace transform of F ( s ) is f ( t ) . Conversely, it is defined by
L 1 { F ( s ) } = f ( t ) .
The main properties of the Laplace transform are be listed below.
  • Linearity property: For all real numbers c 1 and c 2 , we have
    L { c 1 f ( t ) + c 2 g ( t ) } = c 1 L { f ( t ) } + c 2 L { g ( t ) } ,
    L 1 { c 1 F ( s ) + c 2 G ( s ) } = c 1 L 1 { F ( s ) } + c 2 L 1 { G ( s ) } .
  • Shifting property: For all real numbers ω
    L { e ω t f ( t ) } = F ( s ω ) ,
    L 1 { F ( s ω ) } = e ω t f ( t ) .
  • Laplace transform of derivatives: Suppose that the functions f , f , , f ( n ) are continuous for t 0 and of exponential order. Then L { f ( n ) ( t ) } exists, and
    (a)
    L { f ( n ) ( t ) } = s n F ( s ) s n 1 f ( 0 ) s n 2 f ( 0 ) s f n 2 ( 0 ) f n 1 ( 0 ) ,
    (b)
    L { t n f ( t ) } = ( 1 ) n F ( n ) ( s ) .
Definition 3.
The convolution of functions f and g is defined as
f ( t ) g ( t ) = 0 t f ( x ) g ( t x ) d x .
It is known that the convolution is commutative and that it is satisfied:
L 1 { F ( s ) G ( s ) } = f ( t ) g ( t ) .

2.2. Double Laplace Transform and Basic Properties

In the middle of the 20th century, the double Laplace transform arose as a natural extension of the single Laplace transform to solve partial differential equations and gained prominence as a powerful tool in applied mathematics, physics, and engineering [31,32].
Definition 4.
Consider a function u ( x , y ) for x , t > 0 ; the double Laplace transform is defined as
U ( p , s ) = L x t { u ( x , t ) } = 0 e p x 0 e s t u ( x , t ) d t d x ,
whenever the improper double integral exists. In general p and s are complex numbers.
Definition 5.
If the double Laplace transform of u ( x , t ) is U ( p , s ) , then the inverse double Laplace transform of U ( p , s ) is u ( x , t ) . It is represented by a complex double integral formula
L x t 1 { U ( p , s ) } = 1 2 π i c i c + i e p t d i d + i e s x U ( p , s ) d p d s .
It must be fulfilled that U ( p , s ) is an analytic function for all p and s in a region of the complex plane such that R e ( p ) c and R e ( s ) d . That is, the integrals are evaluated along vertical lines in the complex plane, positioned at c and d, respectively, to avoid the poles of the function U and to ensure the analyticity and convergence of the integrals. These vertical paths are known as Bromwich contours [33].
The operator L x t 1 is also linear, and its main properties with regard to the partial derivatives are described below.
(i)
The double Laplace transform of first partial derivatives is given by
L x t u ( x , t ) x = p U ( p , s ) U ( 0 , s ) ,
L x t u ( x , t ) t = s U ( p , s ) U ( p , 0 ) .
(ii)
The double Laplace transform of n-th partial derivatives is given by
L x t n u ( x , t ) x n = p n U ( p , s ) i = 0 n 1 p n 1 i i U ( 0 , s ) x i ,
L x t n u ( x , t ) t n = s n U ( p , s ) j = 0 n 1 s n 1 j j U ( p , 0 ) t j .
(iii)
The double Laplace transform of the mixed partial derivative is given by
L x t 2 u ( x , t ) x t = p s U ( p , s ) p U ( p , 0 ) s U ( 0 , s ) + u ( 0 , 0 ) .
(iv)
The double Laplace transform of a product of functions of one independent variable is expressed by
L x t { u ( x ) v ( t ) } = L { u ( x ) } L { v ( t ) } .
The double Laplace transform can be useful for solving wave, Laplace, heat, and non-homogeneous partial differential equations, which appear in many areas of physics, applied mathematics, and engineering. It is a highly effective instrument for reducing calculations in various engineering and mathematics disciplines. Additionally, it offers a potent approach to linear system analysis. This method is frequently employed to resolve differential and integral equations [34]. In [35,36,37,38,39,40,41], the authors implemented the double Laplace transform when solving a variety of NLPDE-modeled problems, including those with standard and fractional derivatives. In [34,42], researchers analyzed the transform to uncover new properties that have many applications. These properties enhance the versatility of the double Laplace transform, making it a valuable tool in both theoretical and practical contexts.

3. Methodology

In this section, we will provide an overview of the double Laplace–Adomian method (DLADM), a methodology that has not received much attention in mathematical applications. This approach integrates the ADM and the double Laplace transform. To decompose the nonlinear term in the PDE, we will use the Adomian polynomials. The components are determined recursively, and the solution is constructed as an infinite series. The effectiveness of the DLADM lies in its ability to simplify complex problems by transforming them into a more manageable form.
The following are the steps inherent in the double Laplace–Adomian method.
As an illustration of a general problem, let us examine the following NLPDE presented in its operational form:
( D t n + L + N ) u ( x , t ) = f ( x , y ) .
where D t n is the differential operator that denotes the nth time derivative, L is the linear component of the equation, N is the nonlinear component, and f is any function that has a double Laplace transform. Furthermore, suppose that NLPDE (19) has as initial conditions u ( x , 0 ) , D t u ( x , 0 ) ,…, D t n 1 ( x , 0 ) .
The following result is obtained by using the double Laplace transform on both sides of Equation (19):
L x t { D t n u ( x , t ) } + L L x t { u ( x , t ) } + N L x t { u ( x , t ) } = L x t { f ( x , t ) } .
Applying the definitions shown in Section 2 of the double Laplace transform to the nth derivative, we derive
L x t { u ( x , t ) } = H ( p , s ) 1 s n L L x t { u ( x , t ) } 1 s n N L x t { u ( x , t ) } ,
where we have considered
H ( p , s ) = 1 s n L x t { f ( x , t ) } + j = 0 n 1 s n 1 j j U ( p , 0 ) t j .
The two main principles of the ADM are as follows [43,44]:
  • Decomposition of the solution: The central idea of the ADM is to decompose the NLPDE solution u into a series whose terms are generated recursively; that is,
    u ( x , t ) = n = 0 u n ( x , t ) = u 0 ( x , t ) + u 1 ( x , t ) + u 2 ( x , t ) +
    Then, every u n is calculated iteratively.
  • Decomposition of nonlinear terms: This is a crucial part of the ADM. The nonlinear term N ( u ) is decomposed into an infinite series of Adomian polynomials, denoted as P n :
    N ( u ) = n = 0 P n ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n ) .
    These Adomian polynomials are generated in a manner that implies they are solely dependent on the components u 0 , u 1 ,…, u n .
    Kataria and Vellaisamy in [45] introduced a recursive technique for computing Adomian polynomials, eliminating the need for laborious computations of the nth derivative. With this method, each P n is computed as
    P 0 ( u 0 ) = N ( u 0 ) ,
    P n ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n ) = 1 2 π π π N k = 0 n u k e i k ω e i n ω d ω , n 1 .
The subsequent step requires applying an inverse double Laplace transform to both sides of Equation (21) to obtain
u ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { H ( p , s ) } L x t 1 1 s n L L x t { u ( x , t ) } L x t 1 1 s n N L x t { u ( x , t ) } .
We may now implement the two basic ideas of the ADM on both sides of Equation (27), producing
n = 0 u n ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { H ( p , s ) } L x t 1 1 s n L x t { L n = 0 u n ( x , t ) + n = 0 P n } .
By equating the terms on both sides, we derive
u 0 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { H ( p , s ) } , u 1 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s n L x t { L u 0 ( x , t ) + P 0 ( u 0 ) } , u 2 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s n L x t { L u 1 ( x , t ) + P 1 ( u 0 , u 1 ) } , u 3 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s n L x t { L u 2 ( x , t ) + P 2 ( u 0 , u 1 , u 2 ) } ,
In general, the nth component u n is obtained as
u n ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s n L x t { L u n 1 ( x , t ) + P n 1 ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n 1 ) } .
The exact solution can be obtained as
u ( x , t ) = n = 0 u n ( x , t ) .
The K-th term approximation of the solution is finally presented as
u K ( x , t ) = n = 0 K 1 u n ( x , t ) , K 1 .
In the same way, the algorithm described above can be rewritten if the differential operator in Equation (19) is D x n , D x t n , etc.
We will now apply the technique described by the DLADM to address a few problems modeled by an NLPDE that have significant mathematical applications.

4. Illustrative Examples of Application

This section will employ the algorithm provided by the DLADM for solving several problems modeled by NPDEs, which hold significant relevance for the application of mathematics across different fields of natural science and engineering. These problems often arise in contexts such as fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and material science, where nonlinear behaviors are prevalent. By leveraging the DLADM algorithm, we aim to provide efficient and accurate solutions that enhance our understanding of these complex systems. To the best of our knowledge, none of these problems has been examined using the mathematical method provided in this paper. All numerical calculations are conducted with Mathematica-Wolfram version 14.2.1 software.

4.1. Model 1: Solitons in Biomembranes

The dynamic behavior of solitons in biomembranes is described by the generalized Boussinesq equation (BE), expressed as follows [46]:
u t t k 2 u x x + a 1 u u x + a 2 u 2 u x x + b 1 ( u x ) 2 + b 2 u ( u x ) 2 + c u x x x x = 0 , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , u t ( x , 0 ) = u 1 ( x ) .
The change in membrane area density as a function of x and t is represented by u ( x , t ) in Equation (33). The nerve axon is represented as a one-dimensional cylinder with lateral density excitations that propagate along the coordinate x and time t. These excitations are critical for the transmission of nerve impulses, allowing for the rapid communication of signals within the nervous system. Learning about the behavior of u ( x , t ) offers explanations for the dynamics of action potentials and their influence on neuronal function. In addition, the parameters a 1 and a 2 represent the nonlinear elastic behavior of the biomembrane, as a real nerve is not isolated but is viscously coupled to the surrounding fluids. In addition, b 1 and b 2 are experimentally determined parameters that determine the density dependence of sound velocity. Lastly, the parameters k 2 and c are used to quantify the dispersion and friction of the nerve axon, respectively [47].
For the problem of the existence and uniqueness of solutions for equations of the same type as Equation (33), the reader may refer to [48].
The model’s initial conditions are determined by the coefficients of Equation (33) and are given as follows [49]:
u ( x , 0 ) = A cosh ( B x ) + C , u t ( x , 0 ) = A B v sinh ( B x ) ( cosh ( B x ) + C ) 2 ,
where v is the velocity of the soliton and the parameters A, B, and C are given by
A = 12 ( ν 2 k 2 ) ( a 1 + b 1 ) 2 6 ( 2 a 2 + b 2 ) ( ν 2 k 2 ) ,
B = k 2 ν 2 c ,
C = ( a 1 + b 1 ) ( a 1 + b 1 ) 2 6 ( 2 a 2 + b 2 ) ( ν 2 k 2 ) .
The algorithm that the DLADM generates to solve Equation (33) is as follows:
u 0 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { 1 s 2 ( s U ( p , 0 ) U t ( p , 0 ) ) } , u n ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s 2 L x t { L u n 1 ( x , t ) + P n 1 ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n 1 ) } , n 1 .
The linear operator L acting on u n 1 is given by
L u n 1 ( x , t ) = k 2 2 u n 1 ( x , t ) x 2 c 4 u n 1 ( x , t ) x 4 .
The initial set of Adomian polynomials that correspond to the decomposition of the nonlinear operator N u = a 1 u u x a 2 u 2 u x x b 1 ( u x ) 2 b 2 u ( u x ) 2 is as follows:
P 0 = a 1 u 0 u 0 x + a 2 u 0 2 u 0 x x + b 1 u 0 x 2 + b 2 u 0 x 2 u 0 , P 1 = a 1 u 0 x u 1 + u 0 u 1 x + a 2 u 0 2 u 1 x x + 2 u 0 u 1 u 0 x x + 2 b 1 u 0 x u 1 x + b 2 u 0 x 2 u 1 + 2 u 0 x u 1 x u 0 , P 2 = a 1 u 0 x u 2 + u 1 x u 1 + u 0 u 2 x + a 2 u 1 2 u 0 x x + 2 u 0 u 2 u 0 x x + 2 u 0 u 1 u 1 x x + u 0 2 u 2 x x + b 1 2 u 0 x u 2 x + u 1 x 2 + b 2 u 1 x 2 u 0 + 2 u 0 x u 2 x u 0 + 2 u 0 x u 1 x u 1 + u 0 x 2 u 2 , P 3 = a 1 u 0 x u 3 + u 1 x u 2 + u 2 x u 1 + u 3 x u 0 + b 1 2 u 0 x u 3 x + 2 u 1 x u 2 x + a 2 u 1 2 u 1 x x + 2 u 1 u 2 u 0 x x + 2 u 0 u 3 u 0 x x + 2 u 0 u 2 u 1 x x + 2 u 0 u 1 u 2 x x + u 0 2 u 3 x x + b 2 u 1 x 2 u 1 + 2 u 1 x u 2 x u 0 + 2 u 0 x u 3 x u 0 + 2 u 0 x u 2 x u 1 + 2 u 0 x u 1 x u 2 + u 0 x 2 u 3 , P 4 = a 1 u 0 x u 4 + u 0 u 4 x + u 1 x u 3 + u 1 u 3 x + u 2 u 2 x + b 1 2 u 0 x u 4 x + 2 u 1 x u 3 x + u 2 x 2 + a 2 ( u 1 2 u 2 x x + 2 u 1 u 2 u 1 x x + u 2 2 u 0 x x + 2 u 1 u 3 u 0 x x + 2 u 0 u 4 u 0 x x + 2 u 0 u 3 u 1 x x + 2 u 0 u 2 u 2 x x + 2 u 0 u 1 u 3 x x + u 0 2 u 4 x x ) + b 2 ( u 1 x 2 u 2 + 2 u 1 x u 2 x u 1 + u 2 x 2 u 0 + 2 u 1 x u 3 x u 0 + 2 u 0 x u 4 x u 0 + 2 u 0 x u 3 x u 1 + 2 u 0 x u 2 x u 2 + 2 u 0 x u 1 x u 3 + u 0 x 2 u 4 ) .
The following Adomian polynomials for this example are calculated in a similar way.
We simulate the behavior of the achieved solitons on biomembranes using the algorithm described in Equation (38). This includes a test of the hypothetical parameters suggested in Table 1. The results obtained are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Remark 1.
Figure 1 shows that the solutions of Equation (33) have a limited maximum height and a lowest speed of movement that matches the pulse speed in myelinated neurones [50]. Furthermore, the black soliton shown in Figure 2 shows a lot of decoherence and could harm the solitons that help with nerve transmission by causing destructive interference, which lowers the stability of neurones [51]. The errors associated with the DLADM and traditional AMD can be distinguished in both figures.

4.2. Model 2: Ion Exchange Processes

The Thomas equation [52] will be the main topic of this application problem. It is presented in its dimensional form as
u x t + α 1 u t + α 2 u x + α 3 u x u t = 0 , u ( x , 0 ) = f ( x ) , u t ( 0 , t ) = g ( t ) .
In this context, α 1 , α 2 , and α 3 are constants that help analyze the dynamics of the system. The velocity of a flux is represented by α 1 , depending on the characteristics of the physical phenomenon. The flow rate variations in space at a specific time are denoted by α 2 . In addition, the effectiveness of the nonlinearity of the system’s behavior is also determined by the constant α 3 , which governs the transport of energy and velocity in space and time. Critical parameters, including the ion exchange rate and the maximal capacity of the ion exchanger, are determined using the Thomas model to predict the effectiveness of an ion exchange column.
For the problem of the existence and uniqueness of solutions for equations of the same type as Equation (40), the reader may refer to [53].
The initial conditions of the model are determined by the coefficients of Equation (40) and are specified as follows [54]:
u ( x , 0 ) = A x + ln [ cosh ( A x ) ] + C , u t ( 0 , t ) = A λ t + ln [ cosh ( A λ t ) ] + C ,
where A and C are constants, and the parameter λ is defined as
λ = α 1 α 3 2 A α 2 , α 2 2 A .
The algorithm that the DLADM generates to solve Equation (40) is as follows:
u 0 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { 1 s U ( p , 0 ) + 1 p U ( 0 , s ) C p s } , u n ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 p s L x t { L u n 1 ( x , t ) + P n 1 ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n 1 ) } , n 1 .
The linear operator L acting on u n 1 is given by
L u n 1 ( x , t ) = α 1 u n 1 ( x , t ) t + α 2 u n 1 ( x , t ) x .
The following is a list of the first set of Adomian polynomials corresponding to the decomposition of the nonlinear operator N u = α 3 u x u t :
P 0 = α 3 u 0 x u 0 t , P 1 = α 3 ( u 0 x u 1 t + u 0 t u 1 x ) , P 2 = α 3 ( u 0 x u 2 t + u 1 x u 1 t + u 2 x u 0 t ) , P 3 = α 3 ( u 0 x u 3 t + u 1 x u 2 t + u 2 x u 1 t + u 3 x u 0 t ) , P 4 = α 3 ( u 0 x u 4 t + u 1 x u 3 t + u 2 x u 2 t + u 3 x u t + u 4 x u 0 t ) , P 5 = α 3 ( u 0 x u 5 t + u 1 x u 4 t + u 2 x u 3 t + u 3 x u 2 t + u 4 x u 1 t + u 5 x u 0 t ) , P 6 = α 3 ( u 0 x u 6 t + u 1 x u 5 t + u 2 x u 4 t + u 3 x u 3 t + u 4 x u 2 t + u 5 x u 1 t ) + u 6 x u 0 t ) .
The solution u ( x , t ) of Equation (40) increases our comprehension of the temporal distribution of ions in the chemical process, probably related to water potabilization treatment. We simulate the behavior of u ( x , t ) using the algorithm described in Equation (40). This includes a test of the hypothetical parameters suggested in Table 2. The simulation’s graphical representations are displayed in Figure 3.
Remark 2.
Figure 3 shows that the breakthrough curve starts with a low dimensionless concentration, meaning the adsorbent is effectively removing the adsorbate. As time advances, the adsorbent reaches saturation, and the dimensionless concentration rises, ultimately nearing an upper limit value, signifying that the effluent concentration approximates the initial intake concentration, indicating column exhaustion. This graph representation is a crucial illustration in chemical engineering for comprehending and planning adsorption processes. Understanding the dynamics of this groundbreaking curve is essential for optimizing the design and operation of adsorption systems. By analyzing the curve, engineers can determine the optimal conditions for maximum efficiency and longevity in the adsorbent material. Additionally, the same figure displays the errors committed by both the DLADM and the classic ADM technique.

4.3. Model 3: Schrödinger Equation with Defocusing Strength Nonlinearities

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) is a crucial equation in numerous fields of physics and mathematics, characterizing the evolution of wave packets in nonlinear mediums. The current study will examine the one-dimensional NLSE expressed as follows:
i u t = u x x + g ( x ) | u | 2 u , t 0 .
The amplitude of the field is denoted by u ( x , t ) in Equation (45), and the strength of the nonlinearity that varies along the x spatial direction is denoted by g ( x ) . The dynamics of matter waves in a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) can be described using Equation (45). In BEC systems, nonlinearity that varies spatially can occur due to Feshbach resonance influenced by changing external fields [55].
For the problem of the existence and uniqueness of solutions for equations of the same type as Equation (45), the reader may refer to [56].
The initial condition for the model described by Equation (45), with regard to bright solitons, can be determined as follows [57]:
u ( x , 0 ) = e x 2 4 .
The algorithm that the DLADM generates to solve Equation (45) is as follows:
u 0 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { 1 s U ( p , 0 ) } , u n ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s L x t { L u n 1 ( x , t ) + P n 1 ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n 1 ) } , n 1 .
The linear operator L acting on u n 1 is given by
L u n 1 = i 2 u n 1 ( x , t ) x 2 .
The following is a list of the first set of Adomian polynomials corresponding to the decomposition of the nonlinear operator N u = i g ( x ) u 2 u * :
P 0 = i g ( x ) ( u 0 2 u 0 * ) , P 1 = i g ( x ) ( 2 u 0 u 1 u 0 * + u 0 2 u 1 * ) , P 2 = i g ( x ) ( 2 u 0 u 2 u 0 * + u 1 2 u 0 * + 2 u 0 u 1 u 1 * + u 0 2 u 2 * ) , P 3 = i g ( x ) ( 2 u 0 u 3 u 0 * + 2 u 1 u 2 u 0 * + 2 u 0 u 2 u 1 * + u 1 2 u 1 * + 2 u 0 u 1 u 2 * + u 0 2 u 3 * ) , P 4 = i g ( x ) ( u 0 * u 2 2 + 2 u 0 u 0 * u 4 + 2 u 0 * u 1 u 3 + 2 u 0 u 1 * u 3 + 2 u 1 u 1 * u 2 + 2 u 0 u 2 * u 2 + u 1 2 u 2 * + 2 u 0 u 1 * u 3 + u 0 2 u 4 * ) .
Feshbach resonances are a crucial tool for controlling interactions between atoms in ultracold quantum gases. They have led to numerous experimental applications, paving the way for significant breakthroughs. Consequently, identifying soliton-type solutions for Equation (45) would greatly enhance our understanding of this physical phenomenon.
In the following, using the recurrence relations given by Equation (47) already found for the problem (45), we evaluate the effectiveness of the DLADM in solving the NLSE with g ( x ) | u | 2 u as the nonlinear potential where g ( x ) is a nonconstant function.
We perform a simulation using the DLADM considering g ( x ) = ( 1 + x 2 ) e x 2 2 and the initial condition u ( x , 0 ) = e x 2 4 with the number of steps K = 14 . The graphical results are shown in Figure 4. Moreover, the errors committed for different values of t and at different values of x are shown in Table 3.
In Appendix A, we can explicitly see the values that the simulation using Mathematica software version 14.2.1 yields for both the first Adomian polynomials P i and the successive approximations u i to the solution u.
Remark 3.
The complex laws revealed through wave packet analysis highlight the profound impact of coefficients’ arrangements on the behavior of wave packets, as shown in the graphs in Figure 4. These images show how specific arrangements of nonlinear terms and position-dependent coefficients can create localized structures, leading to solitons that behave differently from regular waves. Furthermore, numerical simulations provide an interesting perspective on the time evolution of these solutions, showcasing their susceptibility to complex phenomena such as wave breaking and dispersion. Understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing performance in advanced fiber-optic communication systems. Additionally, the same figure displays the errors committed by both the DLADM and the classic ADM technique.

4.4. Model 4: Allen–Cahn Equation

The Allen–Cahn equation is an important one in mathematical physics that explains how different parts of multi-component alloy systems separate, including changes from order to disorder. Disorder can lead to various microstructural changes that significantly influence the material properties. By understanding the processes described by the Allen–Cahn equation, researchers can anticipate and manage the changes in multi-component alloy systems. This understanding enhances the performance of these systems in real-world applications. The equation is named after John W. Cahn and Sam Allen, who developed it in the 1970s [58].
The Allen–Cahn equation that is the subject of this example is as described as follows:
u t = u x x + g ( t ) ( u 3 u ) , t 0 .
In Equation (49), u ( x , t ) denotes the variation between the concentrations of two components in a mixture, reflecting the material’s condition at location x and time t, while g ( t ) is a positive periodic function [59]. The Allen–Cahn equation is an effective tool for the simulation and comprehension of delicate phenomena that involve phase transformations and interfaces.
In Appendix C, the reader will find a proof that demonstrates the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions for the Allen–Cahn equation using a variational formulation, given a specific type of initial condition.
The initial condition for the model given by Equation (49), assuming periodic solutions, may be established as follows [59]:
u ( x , 0 ) = s i n ( π x ) .
The algorithm that the DLADM generates to solve Equation (49) is as follows:
u 0 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { 1 s U ( p , 0 ) } , u n ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s L x t { L u n 1 ( x , t ) + P n 1 ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n 1 ) } , n 1 .
The linear operator L acting on u n 1 is given by
L u n 1 = 2 u n 1 ( x , t ) x 2 + g ( t ) u n 1 .
The following is a list of the first set of Adomian polynomials corresponding to the decomposition of the nonlinear operator N u = g ( t ) u 3 :
P 0 = g ( t ) ( u 0 3 ) , P 1 = g ( t ) ( 3 u 0 2 u 1 ) , P 2 = g ( t ) ( 3 u 0 2 u 2 + 3 u 0 u 1 2 ) , P 3 = g ( t ) ( 3 u 0 2 u 3 + 6 u 0 u 1 u 2 + u 1 3 ) , P 4 = g ( t ) ( 3 u 0 2 u 4 + 6 u 0 u 1 u 3 + 3 u 0 u 2 2 + 3 u 1 2 u 2 ) , P 5 = g ( t ) ( 3 u 0 2 u 5 + 6 u 0 u 1 u 4 + 6 u 0 u 2 u 3 + 3 u 1 2 u 3 + 3 u 1 u 2 2 ) .
We perform a simulation using the DLADM considering g ( t ) = 10 cos ( t ) + 11 and the initial condition u ( x , 0 ) = sin ( π x ) with the number of steps K = 15 . The graphical results are shown in Figure 5. Moreover, the errors committed for different values of t and at different values of x by the DLADM and ADM are shown in Table 4 and Table 5, respectively.
In Appendix B, we can explicitly see the values that the simulation using Mathematica software version 14.2.1 yields for both the first Adomian polynomials P i and the successive approximations u i to the solution u.
Remark 4.
Figure 5 shows a solution of the Allen–Cahn equation for phase separation on a rectangular domain with periodic initial conditions. Phase separation occurs in mixtures of two substances with different properties, such as metals in certain alloys. Understanding the dynamics of phase separation through mathematical models like the Allen–Cahn equation is key to maximizing material design and performance. Additionally, the same figure displays the errors committed by both the DLADM and the classic ADM technique.

4.5. Model 5: Nonlinear Black–Scholes Equation with Variable Volatility

In financial mathematics, the Black–Scholes–Merton equation is a fundamental PDE. The development of this equation in 1973 by Fischer Black and Myron Scholes, along with subsequent contributions from Robert Merton, transformed the field of option pricing and laid a crucial foundation for modern finance theory [60,61].
In the past thirty years, there has been increased interest in nonlinear Black–Scholes equations due to their ability to provide more accurate valuations by incorporating real-world factors. These factors include transaction costs, risks associated with an unprotected portfolio, the preferences of large investors, and the conditions of illiquid markets. Such elements can influence stock prices, volatility, drift, and option pricing.
The present problem treats the nonlinear Black–Scholes equation, in which the nonlinearities are influenced by illiquid markets and the behavior of large traders, expressed as follows [62]:
u t + 1 2 σ 2 x 2 u x x ( 1 + 2 ρ x u x x ) + r x u x r u = 0 , u ( x , 0 ) = f ( x ) , x [ 0 , ) .
where u represents the option price as a function of the underlying price x and time t. Furthermore, we assume that the interest rate r and volatility σ are non-negative constants, whereas ρ is a constant that describes the price of risk.
For the problem of the existence and uniqueness of solutions for equations of the same type as Equation (53), the reader may refer to [63].
The algorithm that the DLADM generates to solve Equation (53) is as follows:
u 0 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 { 1 s U ( p , 0 ) } , u n + 1 ( x , t ) = L x t 1 1 s L x t { L u n ( x , t ) P n ( u 0 , u 1 , , u n ) } , n 0 .
In this problem, the linear operator L acting on u n is given by
L u n = 1 2 σ 2 x 2 2 u n ( x , t ) x 2 + r x u n ( x , t ) x r u n .
The following is a list of the first set of Adomian polynomials corresponding to the decomposition of the nonlinear operator N u = ρ σ 2 x 3 u x x 2 :
P 0 = ρ σ 2 x 3 ( u 0 , x x 2 ) , P 1 = ρ σ 2 x 3 ( 2 u 0 , x x u 1 , x x ) , P 2 = ρ σ 2 x 3 ( 2 u 0 , x x u 2 , x x + u 1 , x x 2 ) , P 3 = ρ σ 2 x 3 ( 2 u 0 , x x u 3 , x x + 2 u 1 , x x u 2 , x x ) , P 4 = ρ σ 2 x 3 ( 2 u 0 , x x u 4 , x x + 2 u 1 , x x u 3 , x x + u 2 , x x 2 ) , P 5 = ρ σ 2 x 3 ( 2 u 0 , x x u 5 , x x + 2 u 1 , x x u 4 , x x + 2 u 2 , x x u 3 , x x ) .
We perform a simulation using the DLADM with the number of steps N = 14 and considering the initial condition u ( x , 0 ) = x + 10 ( x 2 + 2 ) . In addition, let us consider the model data σ = 0.5 , ρ = 0.1 , and r = 1.2 . The graphical results are shown in Figure 6.
Remark 5.
Figure 6 shows that the option always exceeds the price of the underlying asset as a result of variable volatility. The Black–Scholes model remains a fundamental element of quantitative finance and an essential instrument for comprehending and valuing derivatives. Numerous extensions and changes have been created to mitigate its limits and adapt it to more complex financial instruments. The errors made by both the DLADM and the traditional ADM approach are shown in the same figure.

5. Conclusions

This article introduces a novel approach, the DLADM, for resolving nonlinear problems associated with applied mathematics. Several fields, including neuroscience, chemical kinetics, nonlinear optics, metallurgical separation processes, and finance, implement numerical simulations in their mathematical models. The DLADM facilitates the searching of numerical solutions with significantly less error, eliminating the need for linearization or discretization, hence enhancing result accuracy. The findings are pertinent to natural science and mathematical modeling, presenting new opportunities for investigating intricate processes. This study represents the first report of numerical simulations using this technology, emphasizing its potential for practical applications.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions, which helped improve this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Explicit Calculations for Model 3: Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

This appendix shows the detailed calculations of the first Adomian polynomials used in the numerical simulation of Model 3, along with the first terms of the approximate solution using the DLADM.
For our simulation, we consider g ( x ) = ( 1 + x 2 ) e x 2 2 and u 0 ( x , t ) = e x 2 4 .
P 0 = i g ( x ) ( u 0 2 u 0 * ) = i ( 1 + x 2 ) e x 2 4 , P 1 = i g ( x ) ( 2 u 0 u 1 u 0 * + u 0 2 u 1 * ) = 3 4 x 2 i t ( 1 + x 2 ) 1 8 t e 2 x 2 x 4 1 8 i t 2 e x 2 2 x 2 + 9 128 i t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x + 9 t 3 x 2 128 , P 2 = i g ( x ) ( 2 u 0 u 2 u 0 * + u 1 2 u 0 * + 2 u 0 u 1 u 1 * + u 0 2 u 2 * ) = 1 4 i t + 7 32 x 4 + i t 2 x 2 e x 2 2 + i t 2 x 4 e x 2 2 + 9 t 2 4 e x 2 2 + 9 t 2 2 x 2 e x 2 2 + 3 4 t 2 x 4 e x 2 2 + 1 8 t 6 e 2 x 2 x 3 + ( i ) t 5 e x 2 2 x 2 + 6 i t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 3 it 2 + 6 t 2 x 2 it 2 + 8 t ( x + 3 i ) + ( 16 + 32 i ) ixt , P 3 = i g ( x ) ( 2 u 0 u 3 u 0 * + 2 u 1 u 2 u 0 * + 2 u 0 u 2 u 1 * + u 1 2 u 1 * + 2 u 0 u 1 u 2 * + u 0 2 u 3 * ) = 9 8 9 i 2 t 3 e x 2 x 2 3 i t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 2 + 15 32 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 2 + 9 16 3 i 2 t 3 e x 2 i t 3 e 3 x 2 2 + 5 32 i t 3 e x 2 2 1 2 i t 3 e x 2 x 6 i t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 6 + 1 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 6 + 3 16 7 i 2 t 3 e x 2 x 4 3 i t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 4 + 5 32 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 4 1 4 i 4 t 2 e x 2 x 2 5 8 t 2 e x 2 2 x 2 + 1 2 i 8 t 2 e x 2 2 1 4 t 2 e x 2 x 6 3 8 t 2 e x 2 2 x 6 1 2 i 4 t 2 e x 2 x 4 9 4 t 2 e x 2 2 x 4 11 16 i t x 2 1 8 i t e x 2 2 x 6 + 21 32 i 8 t e x 2 2 x 4 i t 9 x 6 128 , P 4 = i g ( x ) ( u 0 * u 2 2 + 2 u 0 u 0 * u 4 + 2 u 0 * u 1 u 3 + 2 u 0 u 1 * u 3 + 2 u 1 u 1 * u 2 + 2 u 0 u 2 * u 2 + u 1 2 u 2 * + 2 u 0 u 1 * u 3 + u 0 2 u 4 * ) = 1 2 e 5 x 2 2 t 6 x 12 1 96 e 2 x 2 t 6 x 12 + e 3 x 2 t 6 x 12 1 4 i e 5 x 2 2 t 5 x 12 3 8 i e 2 x 2 t 5 x 12 + 1 8 e 2 x 2 t 4 x 12 9 128 i e 3 x 2 2 t 3 x 12 + 7 2 + 3 i 16 e 5 x 2 2 t 6 x 10 5 32 e 2 x 2 t 6 x 10 + 3 e 3 x 2 t 6 x 10 1 4 + i 2 e 5 x 2 2 t 5 x 10 9 4 i e 2 x 2 t 5 x 10 + 1 8 + 21 i 32 e 2 x 2 t 4 x 10 + 9 2 + 9 i 8 e 5 x 2 2 t 6 x 8 15 32 e 2 x 2 t 6 x 8 + 3 e 3 x 2 t 6 x 8 1 4 + i 4 e 5 x 2 2 t 5 x 8 5 8 i e 2 x 2 t 5 x 8 + 11 16 e 3 x 2 2 t 4 x 8 + 3 2 + 9 i 16 e 5 x 2 2 t 6 x 6 5 32 e 2 x 2 t 6 x 6 + e 3 x 2 t 6 x 6 1 2 i e x 2 t 5 x 6 i e 3 x 2 2 t 5 x 6 + 1 8 + i 2 e 2 x 2 t 5 x 6 + 1 96 e x 2 2 i t 5 x 6 1 4 e x 2 t 4 x 6 3 8 e x 2 2 t 4 x 6 + e 3 x 2 2 t 4 x 6 1 8 i e x 2 2 t 3 x 6 9 t 2 x 6 128 + 3 16 7 i 2 e x 2 t 5 x 4 3 i e 3 x 2 2 t 5 x 4 + 5 32 e x 2 2 i t 5 x 4 1 2 i 4 e x 2 t 4 x 4 9 4 e x 2 2 t 4 x 4 + 21 32 i 8 e x 2 2 t 3 x 4 + 9 8 9 i 2 e x 2 t 5 x 2 3 i e 3 x 2 2 t 5 x 2 + 15 32 e x 2 2 i t 5 x 2 1 4 i 4 e x 2 t 4 x 2 5 8 e x 2 2 t 4 x 2 11 16 i t 3 x 2 + 9 16 3 i 2 e x 2 t 5 i e 3 x 2 2 t 5 + 1 32 i t 4 e x 2 2 32 e x 2 + 5 ( x + 3 i ) + 5 32 e x 2 2 i t 5 + 1 2 i 8 e x 2 2 t 4 i t 3 .
u 0 ( x , t ) = e x 2 4 , u 1 ( x , t ) = x 2 4 i t ( 1 + x 2 ) e x 2 2 + 9 64 9 i 256 t 4 e 3 x 2 2 x 4 + t ( 144 + 36 i ) e x 2 2 , u 2 ( x , t ) = x 6 384 1 8 i e x 2 2 t 2 + 1 4 i e x 2 x 2 t 2 + 1 4 i e x 2 x 4 t 2 x 6 384 + 9 48 t 3 e x 2 + 9 24 t 3 e x 2 x 2 + 45 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 2 + 15 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 + 1 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 6 + 3 48 t 3 e x 2 x 4 + 15 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 4 13 16 i t x 2 + 7 32 t e x 2 2 x 4 i t , u 3 ( x , t ) = x 6 384 1 8 i e x 2 2 t 2 + 1 4 i e x 2 x 2 t 2 + 1 4 i e x 2 x 4 t 2 x 6 384 + 9 48 t 3 e x 2 + 9 24 t 3 e x 2 x 2 + 45 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 2 + 15 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 + 1 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 6 + 3 48 t 3 e x 2 x 4 + 15 96 i t 3 e x 2 2 x 4 13 16 i t x 2 + 7 32 t e x 2 2 x 4 i t + 27 128 + i 32 t 4 e 2 x 2 x 4 + 4 t 3 e x 2 2 x 2 + ( 336 + 18 i ) e x 2 2 + 96 e x 2 x 2 + 3 15 x t 2 + 48 t 2 e x 2 2 ( 2 + 2 i ) e x 2 2 + 5 i x 2 i 2 e x 2 2 + 3 x 6 2 ( 1 + 2 i ) e x 2 2 + 9 i x 4 + ( 1 + 4 i ) + 12 t 22 x 2 + 4 e x 2 2 x 6 + ( 4 + 21 i ) e x 2 2 x 4 + 32 27 i x 6 , u 4 ( x , t ) = 48 t 3 e x 2 x 18 36 t 3 e x 2 2 x 18 + 3440 t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 18 + 1536 t 3 e 5 x 2 2 x 18 + 4608 t 3 e 2 x 2 x 18 972 t 3 e x 2 2 x 16 + ( 10992 + 696 i ) t 3 e x 2 x 16 + ( 67664 + 896 i ) t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 16 + ( 10752 3072 i ) t 3 e 5 x 2 2 x 16 + ( 56064 4320 i ) t 3 e 2 x 2 x 16 7896 t 3 e x 2 2 x 14 + ( 138688 + 8832 i ) t 3 e x 2 x 14 + ( 389200 8640 i ) t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 14 + ( 26112 18432 i ) t 3 e 5 x 2 2 x 14 + ( 200256 55680 i ) t 3 e 2 x 2 x 14 ( 21864 + 24 i ) t 3 e x 2 2 x 12 + ( 464832 + 30880 i ) t 3 e x 2 x 12 + ( 26112 36864 i ) t 3 e 5 x 2 2 x 12 + ( 709072 96384 i ) t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 12 + ( 268224 161376 i ) t 3 e 2 x 2 x 12 ( 8884 + 504 i ) t 3 e x 2 2 x 10 + ( 203504 + 24560 i ) t 3 e x 2 x 10 + ( 9216 30720 i ) t 3 e 5 x 2 2 x 10 + ( 268896 89152 i ) t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 10 + ( 120000 131520 i ) t 3 e 2 x 2 x 10 ( 162000 39496 i ) t 3 e x 2 x 8 ( 163488 50592 i ) t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 8 9216 i t 3 e 5 x 2 2 x 8 ( 13248 1536 i ) t 3 e 2 x 2 x 8 + ( 7300 2200 i ) t 3 e x 2 2 x 8 ( 53760 9360 i ) t 3 e x 2 x 6 ( 57888 34464 i ) t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 6 ( 13824 23040 i ) t 3 e 2 x 2 x 6 + ( 2340 568 i ) t 3 e x 2 2 x 6 + ( 900 + 480 i ) t 3 e x 2 2 x 4 + ( 17280 9216 i ) t 3 e 3 x 2 2 x 4 + ( 20736 9672 i ) t 3 e x 2 x 4 + 351 32 1161 i 256 t 9 e 7 x 2 2 x 8 5805 2048 1755 i 256 t 10 e 4 x 2 x 10 + 351 4096 + 1161 i 32768 t 14 e 9 x 2 2 48 e x 2 2 + ( 56 + 3 i ) x 12 5 t e x 2 2 x 2 + 8 i ,
u 5 ( x , t ) = e 11 x 2 2 ( 557280 1347840 i ) t 12 x 4 + ( 2 i ) x 2 + ( 1 i ) x 12 + e 5 x 2 ( 5616 + 2322 i ) t 11 384 x 4 + ( 2 i ) x 2 + ( 1 i ) + 5 t ( 3 128 i ) x 6 ( 50 + 547 i ) x 4 ( 53 + 179 i ) x 2 + ( 24 + 96 i ) x 10 + e 9 x 2 2 ( 2808 + 1161 i ) t 11 ( 45 840 i ) t x 8 + ( ( 2048 + 48 i ) + ( 270 5040 i ) t ) x 6 + ( ( 8752 800 i ) + ( 75 1400 i ) t ) x 4 + ( ( 2864 848 i ) + ( 220 + 1135 i ) t ) x 2 + ( 1536 + 384 i ) x 8 + e 4 x 2 ( 41040 35640 i ) t 7 + ( 10 + 23 i ) 3 x 6 + 18 x 4 + 5 x 2 + ( 4 + i ) t 4 + ( 4 + 8 i ) x 4 + ( 2 i ) x 2 + ( 1 i ) x 8 100663296 i e 5 x 2 2 x 2 + 3 x 4 + ( 2 i ) x 2 + ( 1 i ) 3 x 6 + e 7 x 2 2 ( 44928 + 18576 i ) t 6 16 i x 4 + ( 2 i ) x 2 + ( 1 i ) + 5 t 3 x 6 + 18 x 4 + 5 x 2 + ( 4 + i ) x 6 ( 148608 359424 i ) e 3 x 2 t 6 3 x 6 + 18 x 4 + 5 x 2 + ( 4 + i ) x 4 + 6291456 e 2 x 2 x 4 + ( 2 i ) x 2 + ( 1 i ) 72 i x 8 + ( 3 704 i ) x 6 ( 50 + 1531 i ) x 4 ( 29 + 323 i ) x 2 + ( 72 + 288 i ) x 4 1048576 i e 3 x 2 2 i 647 x 18 + ( 12507 564 i ) x 16 + ( 84084 12522 i ) x 14 + ( 242686 82582 i ) x 12 + ( 309744 196314 i ) x 10 + ( 140991 160962 i ) x 8 ( 28141 7346 i ) x 6 ( 31794 54120 i ) x 4 ( 432 6534 i ) x 2 + ( 1512 4968 i ) x 2 + 131072 i x 2 + 15 3 x 6 + 18 x 4 + 5 x 2 + ( 4 + i ) 3 + 786432 e x 2 2 3 x 6 + 18 x 4 + 5 x 2 + ( 4 + i ) 2 i x 8 + ( 10 151 i ) x 6 + ( 70 977 i ) x 4 + ( 30 265 i ) x 2 + ( 44 + 227 i ) 1572864 i e x 2 213 x 20 + ( 5973 + 87 i ) x 18 + ( 56779 234 i ) x 16 + ( 228809 13284 i ) x 14 + ( 372241 62463 i ) x 12 + ( 164113 54350 i ) x 10 ( 98589 37619 i ) x 8 ( 66539 41662 i ) x 6 + ( 12495 6528 i ) x 4 + ( 6367 6305 i ) x 2 142155 32 + 470205 i 256 t 13 e 9 x 2 2 x 32 + 3395925 8 + 11232675 i 64 t 13 e 11 x 2 2 x 32 + 189540 + 156735 i 2 t 13 e 13 x 2 2 x 32 47385 8 + 156735 i 64 t 13 e 5 x 2 x 32 + 568620 + 470205 i 2 t 13 e 6 x 2 x 32 + 10449 32 3159 i 4 t 12 e 9 x 2 2 x 32 249615 8 75465 i t 12 e 11 x 2 2 x 32 ( 13932 33696 i ) t 12 e 13 x 2 2 x 32 ( 41796 101088 i ) t 12 e 6 x 2 x 32 + 3483 8 1053 i t 12 e 5 x 2 x 32 .
The components u j , j = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , and the approach to u are computed using the Mathematica-Wolfram package version 14.2.1.

Appendix B. Explicit Calculations for Model 4: Allen–Cahn Equation

This appendix shows the detailed calculations of the first Adomian polynomials used in the numerical simulation of Model 4, along with the first terms of the approximate solution using the DLADM.
For our simulation, we consider g ( x ) = 10 cos ( t ) + 11 and u ( x , 0 ) = sin ( π x ) .
P 0 = g ( t ) u 0 3 = ( 10 cos ( t ) + 11 ) sin 3 π x , u 1 ( x , t ) = t sin 3 π x ( π 2 + 11 ) t sin π x 10 sin t sin π x , P 1 = g ( t ) ( 3 u 0 2 u 1 ) = 3 t sin 5 π x ( 3 π 2 t + 33 t + 30 sin t ) sin 3 π x , u 2 ( x , t ) = t 2 2 ( π 4 + 19 π 2 + 121 ) sin π x ( 3 π 2 + 44 ) sin 3 π x + 3 sin 5 π x + 6 π 2 sin π x cos 2 π x + t sin t ( 10 π 2 + 110 ) sin π x 10 sin 3 π x + 20 cos t sin 3 π x + 50 sin 2 t sin π x 5 sin 3 π x , P 2 = g ( t ) ( 3 u 0 2 u 2 + 3 u 0 u 1 2 ) = t 2 ( π 4 + 19 π 2 + 121 ) sin 3 π x ( 3 π 2 + 44 ) sin 5 π x + t 2 3 sin 7 π x + 6 π 2 sin 3 π x cos 2 π x + 2 t sin t ( 10 π 2 + 110 ) sin 3 π x 10 sin 5 π x + 40 cos t sin 5 π x + 100 sin 2 t sin 3 π x 40 sin 5 π x , u 3 ( x , t ) = 2 t 5 x + 25 4 sin t + π x 25 4 sin t π x + 25 8 sin t 3 π x 25 8 sin t + 3 π x + 75 8 sin t 5 π x 75 8 sin t + 5 π x 25 16 sin 2 t + π x + 25 16 sin 2 t π x 25 32 sin 2 t 3 π x + 25 32 sin 2 t + 3 π x 75 32 sin 2 t 5 π x + 75 32 sin 2 t + 5 π x 75 8 sin π x + 75 16 sin 3 π x + 225 16 sin 5 π x + 15 2 π 2 cos t + π x 15 2 π 2 cos t π x 15 2 π 2 cos t 3 π x + 15 2 π 2 cos t + 3 π x + 15 2 x 2 cos t 2 π x + 15 2 x 2 cos t + 2 π x + 15 x cos 2 π x 55 4 t sin π x + 55 8 t sin 3 π x + 165 8 t sin 5 π x 5 x 2 cos t 15 2 x cos t 2 π x 15 2 x cos t + 2 π x + 55 8 t sin t + π x 55 8 t sin t π x + 55 16 t sin t 3 π x 55 16 t sin t + 3 π x + 165 16 t sin t 5 π x 165 16 t sin t + 5 π x 15 x 2 cos 2 π x 121 16 t 2 sin π x + 121 32 t 2 sin 3 π x + 363 32 t 2 sin 5 π x 11 2 t x + 5 x cos t + 5 x 2 + 25 4 π 2 t sin t + π x 25 4 π 2 t sin t π x + 15 4 π 2 t sin t 3 π x 15 4 π 2 t sin t + 3 π x 11 2 π 2 t 2 sin π x + 1 2 π 4 t 2 sin π x + 33 2 π 2 t 2 sin 3 π x + 33 2 t x cos 2 π x + 5 2 π 2 t sin π x + 45 2 π 2 t sin 3 π x 33 2 t x 2 cos 2 π x 1 6 π 6 t 3 sin π x 3025 32 π 2 t 3 sin 5 π x + 11 2 t x 2 .
The components u j , j = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , snf the approach to u are computed using the Mathematica-Wolfram package version 14.2.1.

Appendix C. The Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for the Allen–Cahn Equation

The Allen–Cahn model can be written as
t u Δ u = ϵ 2 f ( u ) , u ( 0 ) = u 0 , x u ( x , t ) = 0 , for every x Ω and t [ 0 , T ] .
  • Given u 0 L 2 ( Ω ) , ϵ > 0 , and T > 0 , we search for a solution u Ω × [ 0 , T ] R for Equation (A1).
The Allen–Cahn equation is the L 2 -gradient flow of the functional
I ϵ ( u ) = 1 2 Ω | u | 2 d x + 1 ϵ 2 Ω F ( u ) d x ,
  • for a non-negative function F C 1 ( R ) such that F = f , satisfying F ( ± 1 ) = 0 .
  • Solutions generally have lower energy levels and create interfaces that distinguish regions where the values remain nearly constant, approaching the minima of F.
Theorem A1.
For every u 0 L 2 ( Ω ) and T > 0 , there exists a weak solution u H 1 ( [ 0 , T ] ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) L 2 ( [ 0 , T ] ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) ) that satisfies u ( 0 ) = u 0 and
t u , v + ( u , v ) = ϵ 2 ( f ( u ) , v )
for almost every t [ 0 , T ] and every v H 1 ( Ω ) . If u 0 H 1 ( Ω ) , the we have u H 1 ( [ 0 , T ] ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) L ( [ 0 , T ] ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) and
I ϵ ( u ( T ) ) + 0 T | | t u | | 2 d t I ϵ ( u 0 )
for every T [ 0 , T ] .
Proof. 
The existence of a solution is established through an implicit time discretization, which results in a sequence of well-posed minimization problems. Straightforward a priori bounds are established and compact embeddings are utilized to demonstrate the existence of a weak limit that satisfies the weak formulation.
If u 0 H 1 ( Ω ) , then we may formally choose v = t u to verify that
| | t u | | 2 + d d t 1 2 | | u | | 2 = ϵ 2 d d t Ω F ( u ) d x .
An integration over the interval [ 0 , T ] suggests the stated bound. This method can be rigorously applied to a time-discretized problem, and the estimate remains valid as the time-step size approaches zero. □
With the above, we have proved the existence of solutions for problem (A1).
Since the nonlinearity f is monotone outside the interval [ 1 , 1 ] , solutions of the Allen–Cahn equation satisfy a maximum principle.
Theorem A2.
If u is a weak solution of the Allen–Cahn equation and | u 0 ( x ) | 1 for almost every x Ω , then | u ( x , t ) | 1 for almost every ( x , t ) Ω × [ 0 , T ] . Solutions with this property are unique.
Proof. 
Let u ˜ H 1 ( [ 0 , T ] ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) L 2 ( [ 0 , T ] ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) ) be the function obtained by truncating u at ± 1 , i.e.,
u ˜ ( x , t ) = min { 1 , max { 1 , u ( x , t ) } }
for almost every ( x , t ) Ω × [ 0 , T ] . Then t u ˜ = t u , u ˜ = u , and f ( u ˜ ) = f ( u ) in { ( x , t ) Ω × [ 0 , T ] : | u ˜ ( x , t ) | 1 } and t u ˜ = 0 , u ˜ = 0 , and f ( u ˜ ) = 0 otherwise. The function u ˜ is therefore a weak solution of the Allen–Cahn equation.
If u u ˜ 0 , then either u u ˜ = 1 and
f ( u ) f ( u ˜ ) f ( u ˜ ) ( u u ˜ ) = f ( 1 ) ( u u ˜ ) = 2 ( u u ˜ ) ,
or u u ˜ = 1 and
f ( u ) f ( u ˜ ) f ( u ˜ ) ( u u ˜ ) = f ( 1 ) ( u u ˜ ) = 2 ( u u ˜ ) .
Altogether we find that almost everywhere in Ω × [ 0 , T ] , we have
f ( u ) f ( u ˜ ) ( u u ˜ ) 2 | u u ˜ | 2 .
The difference ρ = u u ˜ satisfies
t ρ , v + ( ρ , v ) = ϵ 2 ( f ( u ) f ( u ˜ ) , v ) ,
and for ρ = v , we obtain
d d t 1 2 | | ρ | | 2 + | | ρ | | 2 2 ϵ 2 | | ρ | | 2 .
With ρ ( 0 ) = 0 , it follows directly that ρ = 0 in Ω × [ 0 , T ] .
If u 1 and u 2 are solutions with | u 1 | , | u 2 | 1 in Ω × [ 0 , T ] , then we have
| f ( u 1 ) f ( u 2 ) | M f | u 1 u 2 |
almost everywhere in Ω × [ 0 , T ] , where M f = sup a [ 1 , 1 ] | f ( a ) | . The difference ρ = u 1 u 1 satisfies
t ρ , v + ( ρ , v ) = ϵ 2 ( f ( u 1 ) f ( u 2 ) , v ) ,
and the choice v = ρ leads to
d d t 1 2 | | ρ | | 2 + | | ρ | | 2 M f ϵ 2 | | ρ | | 2 .
An application of Gronwall’s lemma implies that u 1 = u 2 . □
With the above, we have proved the uniqueness of solutions for problem (A1).
In the case of Equation (49), let us consider F ( s ) = 1 4 ( s 2 1 ) 2 .

References

  1. He, J.-H. A coupling method of homotopy technique and perturbation technique for nonlinear problems. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2000, 35, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, J.-H. Comparison of homotopy perturbation method and homotopy analysis method. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004, 156, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cadou, J.-M.; Moustaghfir, N.; Mallil, E.H.; Damil, N.; Potier-Ferry, M. Linear iterative solvers based on perturbation techniques. C. R. Math. 2001, 332, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mallil, E.; Lahmam, H.; Damil, N.; Potier-Ferry, M. An iterative process based on homotopy and perturbation techniques. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000, 90, 1845–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, J.-H. An approximate solution technique depending upon artificial parameter. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 1998, 3, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, J.-H. Homotopy perturbation technique. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1999, 178, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liao, S. An optimal homotopy-analysis approach for strongly nonlinear differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2010, 15, 2003–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cveticanin, L. Homotopy–perturbation method for pure nonlinear differential equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2006, 30, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohyud-Din, S.T.; Noor, M.A. Homotopy perturbation method for solving partial differential equations. Z. Naturforsch. A 2009, 64, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ganji, D.D. The application of He’s homotopy perturbation method to nonlinear equations arising in heat transfer. Phys. Lett. A 2006, 355, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adomian, G. Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: The Decomposition Method; Kluwer: Boston MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  12. Turkyilmazoglu, M. Parametrized Adomian decomposition method with optimum convergence. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 2017, 27, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Evans, D.J.; Raslan, K.R. The Adomian decomposition method for solving delay differential equation. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2007, 82, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Lima, M.S.; Santos, J.V.C.; de Souza Prates, J.H.; Silva, C.B.; Moreira, D.; Moret, M.A. Applying the Adomian method to solve the Fokker–Planck equation: A case study in astrophysics. AppliedMath 2024, 4, 1306–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heidarzadeh, H.; Joubari, M.M.; Asghari, R. Application of Adomian decomposition method to nonlinear heat transfer equation. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2012, 4, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. González-Gaxiola, O.; Bernal-Jaquez, R. Applying Adomian decomposition method to solve Burgess equation with a non-linear source. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 2017, 3, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baleanu, D.; Shiri, B. Collocation methods for fractional differential equations involving non-singular kernel. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2018, 116, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pedas, A.; Tamme, E. Numerical solution of nonlinear fractional differential equations by spline collocation methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2014, 255, 216–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shiri, B.; Wu, G.-C.; Baleanu, D. Collocation methods for terminal value problems of tempered fractional differential equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 2020, 156, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Filobello-Nino, U.A.; Vazquez-Leal, H.; Sandoval-Hernandez, M.A.; Dominguez-Chavez, J.A.; Salinas-Castro, A.; Jimenez-Fernandez, V.M.; Huerta-Chua, J.; Hoyos-Reyes, C.; Carrillo-Ramon, N.; Flores-Mendez, J. Modified Lagrange interpolating polynomial (MLIP) method: A straightforward procedure to improve function approximation. AppliedMath 2025, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ongun, M.Y. The Laplace Adomian decomposition method for solving a model for HIV infection of CD4+T cells. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 53, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aland, P.V.; Singh, P. Solution of non-linear partial differential equations using Laplace transform modified Adomian decomposition method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022, 2267, 012156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hussain, S.; Khan, F. Laplace Adomian decomposition method for integro differential equations on time scale. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2025, 16, 103271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. González-Gaxiola, O.; Biswas, A.; Alzahrani, A.K.; Belic, M.R. Highly dispersive optical solitons with a polynomial law of refractive index by Laplace–Adomian decomposition. J. Comput. Electron. 2021, 20, 1216–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Eltayeb, H. Application of double Sumudu-generalized Laplace decomposition method and two-dimensionaltime-fractional coupled Burger’s equation. Bound. Value Probl. 2024, 2024, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rahamh GadAllah, M.; Eltayeb Gadain, H. Conformable double Laplace transform method (CDLTM) and homotopy perturbation method (HPM) for solving conformable fractional partial differential equations. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eltayeb Gadain, H.; Bachar, I.; Mesloub, S. Application of the triple Laplace transform decomposition method for solving singular (2 + 1)-dimensional time-fractional coupled Korteweg–De Vries equations (KdV). Symmetry 2024, 16, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saddique, G.; Zeb, S.; Ali, A. Solitary wave solution of Korteweg–De Vries equation by double Laplace transform with decomposition method. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 2025, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eltayeb, H.; Mesloub, S. The new G-double-Laplace transforms and one-dimensional coupled Sine-Gordon equations. Axioms 2024, 13, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Molina, E.C. The theory of probability: Some comments on Laplace’s Théorie analytique. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 1930, 36, 369–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Estrin, T.A.; Higgins, T.J. The solution of boundary value problems by multiple laplace transformation. J. Frankl. Inst. 1951, 252, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Coon, G.A.; Bernstein, D.L. Some properties of the double Laplace transformation. Am. Math. Soc. 1953, 74, 135–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Debnath, L.; Bhatta, D. Integral Transforms and Their Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  34. Debnath, L. The double Laplace transforms and their properties with applications to functional, integral and partial differential equations. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 2016, 2, 223–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eltayeb Gadain, H.; Kiliçman, A.; Mesloub, S. Application of the double Laplace Adomian decomposition method for solving linear singular one dimensional thermo-elasticity coupled system. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ali, A.; Abdullah; Ahmad, A. The solution of Poisson partial differential equations via double Laplace Transform Method. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2021, 4, 100058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, K.; Khan, Z.; Irfan, M. Investigation of Hirota equation: Modified double Laplace decomposition method. Phys. Scr. 2021, 96, 104006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Eltayeb, H.; Bachar, I. A note on double Laplace decomposition method for solving singular one dimensional pseudo thermo-elasticity coupled system. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2018, 11, 864–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eltayeb, H.; Mesloub, S.; Kiliçman, A. Application of double Laplace decomposition method to solve a singular one-dimensional pseudohyperbolic equation. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2017, 9, 1687814017716638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Eltayeb, H.; Kiliçman, A. A note on double Laplace transform and telegraphic equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 932578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dhunde, R.R.; Waghmare, G.L. Double Laplace transform method for solving space and time fractional telegraph equations. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2016, 2016, 1414595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Debnath, J.; Debnath, N.C. Theorems on association of variables in multidimensional Laplace transforms. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1989, 12, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Adomian, G. Nonlinear Stochastic Operator Equations; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  44. Adomian, G. Applications of Nonlinear Stochastic Systems Theory to Physics; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kataria, K.K.; Vellaisamy, P. Simple parametrization methods for generating Adomian polynomials. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2016, 10, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Heimburg, T.; Jackson, A.D. On soliton propagation in biomembranes and nerves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9790–9795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mueller, J.K.; Tyler, W.J. A quantitative overview of biophysical forces impinging on neural function. Phys. Biol. 2014, 11, 051001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oruc, G.; Muslu, G.M. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to initial boundary value problem for the higher order Boussinesq equation. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2019, 47, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Biswas, A.; Kara, A.H.; Savescu, M.; Bkhari, A.H.; Zaman, F.D. Solitons and conservation laws in neurosciences. Int. J. Biomath. 2013, 6, 1350017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Villagran Vargas, E.; Ludu, A.; Hustert, R.; Gumrich, P.; Jackson, A.D.; Heimburg, T. Periodic solutions and refractory periods in the soliton theory for nerves and the locust femoral nerve. Biophys. Chem. 2011, 153, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Geesink, J.H.; Meijer, D.K.F. Bio-soliton model that predicts non-thermal electromagnetic frequency bands, that either stabilize or destabilize living cells. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2017, 36, 357–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thomas, H.C. Heterogeneous ion exchange in a flowing system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1664–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Korpusov, M.O. Blowup solutions of the nonlinear Thomas equation. Theor. Math. Phys. 2019, 201, 1457–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Al-Ghafri, K.S. Analytic solutions of the Thomas equation by generalized tanh and travelling wave hypothesis methods. Int. J. Appl. Math. Res. 2013, 2, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chin, C.; Grimm, R.; Julienne, P.; Tiesinga, E. Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 1225–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Federico, S.; Li, Z.; Yu, X. On the uniqueness of variable coefficient Schrödinger equations. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2025, 27, 2450016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Borovkova, O.V.; Kartashov, Y.V.; Torner, L.; Malomed, B.A. Bright solitons from defocusing nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. E 2011, 84, 035602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Allen, S.M.; Cahn, J.W. Coherent and incoherent equilibria in iron-rich iron-aluminum alloys. Acta Metall. 1975, 23, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, R.; Huang, H.; Ji, S.; Yin, J. Periodic solutions for the Allen-Cahn equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2015, 2015, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Black, F.; Scholes, M. The pricing options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econ. 1973, 81, 637–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Merton, R.C. Theory of rational options pricing. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 1973, 4, 141–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Frey, R.; Stremme, A. Market volatility and feedback effects from dynamic hedging. Math. Financ. 1997, 4, 351–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sozhaeswari, P.; Sowrirajan, R.; Loganathan, K.; Gyeltshen, S. A study on the impact of nonlinear source term in Black-Scholes option pricing model. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2022, 2022, 6385401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) A 3D bright soliton generated using the DLADM with 14 steps for the parameters specified in Case 1 of Table 1. (b) A 2D contour plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (33). (c) A graph representing the error associated with DLADM. (d) A graph showing the error associated with the ADM.
Figure 1. (a) A 3D bright soliton generated using the DLADM with 14 steps for the parameters specified in Case 1 of Table 1. (b) A 2D contour plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (33). (c) A graph representing the error associated with DLADM. (d) A graph showing the error associated with the ADM.
Appliedmath 05 00098 g001
Figure 2. (a) A 3D bright soliton generated using the DLADM with 14 steps for the parameters specified in Case 2 of Table 1. (b) A 2D contour plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (33). (c) A graph representing the error associated with the DLADM. (d) A graph showing the error associated with the ADM.
Figure 2. (a) A 3D bright soliton generated using the DLADM with 14 steps for the parameters specified in Case 2 of Table 1. (b) A 2D contour plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (33). (c) A graph representing the error associated with the DLADM. (d) A graph showing the error associated with the ADM.
Appliedmath 05 00098 g002
Figure 3. (a) A 3D plot solution using the DLADM and 14 steps for the parameters given in Case 1 of Table 2. (b) The breakthrough curves of the Thomas equation for adsorption varying with time for t [ 0 , 1 ] in a fixed-bed adsorption column at x = 0.2 , x = 0.5 , and x = 0.8 . (c) DLADM error graph. (d) ADM error graph. Consider A = 3 and C = 8 .
Figure 3. (a) A 3D plot solution using the DLADM and 14 steps for the parameters given in Case 1 of Table 2. (b) The breakthrough curves of the Thomas equation for adsorption varying with time for t [ 0 , 1 ] in a fixed-bed adsorption column at x = 0.2 , x = 0.5 , and x = 0.8 . (c) DLADM error graph. (d) ADM error graph. Consider A = 3 and C = 8 .
Appliedmath 05 00098 g003
Figure 4. (a) A 3D bright soliton simulation for the NLSE using the DLADM with K = 14 steps. (b) A 2D density plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (45). (c) DLADM error graph. (d) ADM error graph.
Figure 4. (a) A 3D bright soliton simulation for the NLSE using the DLADM with K = 14 steps. (b) A 2D density plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (45). (c) DLADM error graph. (d) ADM error graph.
Appliedmath 05 00098 g004
Figure 5. (a) A 3D plot of the simulation of the periodic solution for the Allen–Cahn equation using the DLADM with K = 15 steps. (b) A 2D contour plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (49). (c) DLADM error graph. (d) ADM error graph.
Figure 5. (a) A 3D plot of the simulation of the periodic solution for the Allen–Cahn equation using the DLADM with K = 15 steps. (b) A 2D contour plot illustrating the soliton solution of Equation (49). (c) DLADM error graph. (d) ADM error graph.
Appliedmath 05 00098 g005
Figure 6. (a) A 3D simulation for the option price using the DLADM with K = 14 steps. (b) Option price at time t = 0.25 years. (c) Option price at time t = 0.5 years. (d) Option price at time t = 1.0 years. (e) DLADM error graph. (f) ADM error graph.
Figure 6. (a) A 3D simulation for the option price using the DLADM with K = 14 steps. (b) Option price at time t = 0.25 years. (c) Option price at time t = 0.5 years. (d) Option price at time t = 1.0 years. (e) DLADM error graph. (f) ADM error graph.
Appliedmath 05 00098 g006
Table 1. Coefficients of Equation (33) used to simulate solitons in biomembranes.
Table 1. Coefficients of Equation (33) used to simulate solitons in biomembranes.
Cases a 1 a 2 b 1 b 2 c k 2 ABC ν K | Max Error |
1 1.5 0.1 3.2 0.5 1.5 4.0 1.46 6.05 1.05 7.67 14 1.5 × 10 8
2 1.0 2.2 5.2 3.3 0.03 1.0 2.05 5.34 1.55 1.04 14 2.0 × 10 8
Table 2. Coefficients of the Thomas Equation (40) to simulate u ( x , t ) .
Table 2. Coefficients of the Thomas Equation (40) to simulate u ( x , t ) .
Case α 1 α 2 α 3 K-StepsDLADM | Max Error | ADM | Max Error |
1 4.0 2.2 1.5 14 4.0 × 10 7 8.1 × 10 4
Table 3. The absolute error when t = 0.25 , t = 0.50 , and t = 0.75 for bright soliton simulation.
Table 3. The absolute error when t = 0.25 , t = 0.50 , and t = 0.75 for bright soliton simulation.
xAbsolute Error at t = 0.25 Absolute Error at t = 0.50 Absolute Error at t = 0.75
0.75 5.12 × 10 8 4.91 × 10 7 9.16 × 10 6
0.50 4.05 × 10 8 7.23 × 10 7 8.32 × 10 6
0.25 2.80 × 10 9 5.66 × 10 8 7.55 × 10 7
0.25 3.05 × 10 9 5.48 × 10 8 7.37 × 10 7
0.50 4.27 × 10 8 6.79 × 10 7 8.15 × 10 6
0.75 4.96 × 10 8 5.13 × 10 7 8.96 × 10 6
Table 4. The absolute error by the DLADM when t = 1.0 , t = 2.0 , and t = 3.0 for the periodic solution for the Allen–Cahn equation.
Table 4. The absolute error by the DLADM when t = 1.0 , t = 2.0 , and t = 3.0 for the periodic solution for the Allen–Cahn equation.
xAbsolute Error at t = 1.0 Absolute Error at t = 2.0 Absolute Error at t = 3.0
4.0 3.52 × 10 7 8.91 × 10 6 9.76 × 10 5
3.0 3.02 × 10 7 6.53 × 10 7 7.35 × 10 6
2.0 2.90 × 10 8 5.96 × 10 7 4.15 × 10 6
1.0 1.05 × 10 8 4.38 × 10 8 2.57 × 10 7
1.0 1.22 × 10 8 4.45 × 10 8 2.15 × 10 7
2.0 2.96 × 10 8 5.66 × 10 7 4.56 × 10 6
3.0 3.05 × 10 7 7.01 × 10 7 7.90 × 10 6
4.0 3.47 × 10 7 8.85 × 10 7 9.84 × 10 5
Table 5. The absolute error by the ADM when t = 1.0 , t = 2.0 , and t = 3.0 for the periodic solution for the Allen–Cahn equation.
Table 5. The absolute error by the ADM when t = 1.0 , t = 2.0 , and t = 3.0 for the periodic solution for the Allen–Cahn equation.
xAbsolute Error at t = 1.0 Absolute Error at t = 2.0 Absolute Error at t = 3.0
4.0 5.22 × 10 5 9.33 × 10 4 8.34 × 10 3
3.0 4.55 × 10 5 8.43 × 10 4 7.03 × 10 3
2.0 2.46 × 10 5 6.60 × 10 4 6.10 × 10 3
1.0 1.34 × 10 5 4.95 × 10 4 5.76 × 10 3
1.0 1.44 × 10 5 5.56 × 10 4 6.66 × 10 3
2.0 2.45 × 10 5 5.98 × 10 4 4.56 × 10 3
3.0 3.95 × 10 5 8.78 × 10 4 7.70 × 10 3
4.0 5.88 × 10 5 9.45 × 10 4 8.78 × 10 3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Gaxiola, O. The Double Laplace–Adomian Method for Solving Certain Nonlinear Problems in Applied Mathematics. AppliedMath 2025, 5, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030098

AMA Style

González-Gaxiola O. The Double Laplace–Adomian Method for Solving Certain Nonlinear Problems in Applied Mathematics. AppliedMath. 2025; 5(3):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030098

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Gaxiola, Oswaldo. 2025. "The Double Laplace–Adomian Method for Solving Certain Nonlinear Problems in Applied Mathematics" AppliedMath 5, no. 3: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030098

APA Style

González-Gaxiola, O. (2025). The Double Laplace–Adomian Method for Solving Certain Nonlinear Problems in Applied Mathematics. AppliedMath, 5(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030098

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop