Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Roles of Chelating/Fuel Agents in Shaping the Properties of Copper Ferrites
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Sorbitan to Extract Capsaicinoids and Bioactive Compounds: Condition Optimization Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Removal of Radio and Stable Isotopes of Cobalt and Cesium from Contaminated Aqueous Solutions by Isatin-Derived Ligand

1
College of Applied Sciences, University of Fallujah, Anbar P.O. Box 31002, Iraq
2
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Anbar, Ramadi P.O. Box 31001, Iraq
3
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science (Girl’s), Al-Azhar University, Youssif Abbas St., Nasr-City, Cairo P.O. Box 11754, Egypt
4
Radioisotope Department, Nuclear Research Center, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo P.O. Box 11787, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
AppliedChem 2025, 5(2), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedchem5020008
Submission received: 9 March 2025 / Revised: 23 March 2025 / Accepted: 26 March 2025 / Published: 3 April 2025

Abstract

:
This study investigated the effectiveness of a ligand known as (2-Mercapyo-phenylimino)-1,3-dihydro-indol-2-one-based ligand, in removing stable/radioactive cesium and cobalt from contaminated wastewater. Several parameters, such as contact duration, temperature, adsorbent quantity, pH of the medium, and concentration of adsorbate, have been investigated as primary active parameters impacting the adsorption process. Regarding the stable isotopes, the concentrations of Co2+ and Cs+ were measured before and after the treatment processes using the Optical Emissions Spectroscopy with Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP-OES) technique. Additionally, kinetic and equilibrium isotherm models were applied to understand the equilibrium data. Both Cs+ and Co2+ were ideally eliminated after 120 and 60 min, respectively. The optimal pH for Cs+ was 6.3, while that for Co2+ was 5. The results indicate that the adsorption process is endothermic for Co2+ and exothermic for Cs+. Three thermodynamic parameters (∆G°, ∆H°, and ∆S°) were calculated. The reported R2 values for the Freundlich and Langmuir models showed that the adsorption process for Cs+ and Co2+ always followed these isotherms, regardless of the temperature used. For Cs+, the maximum single-layer capacity (qmax) was 15.10 mg g−1, while for Co2+, it was 62.11 mg g−1. When the aqueous medium was spiked with both radioisotopes individually, the elimination of 60Co and 134Cs achieved maximum values of 99 and 86%, respectively, within 120 min. It can be concluded that the ligand effectively removed cobalt and cesium from wastewater, with higher adsorption for cobalt.

1. Introduction

The widespread presence of heavy metal ions in water sources is a major environmental concern that endangers all living things. This is because of their natural tendency to accumulate in biological tissues and their resistance to degradation [1,2]. One of the main causes of water contamination is the presence of heavy metals in IMEW, or industrial and municipal effluent water. The primary concern associated with IMEW is its contamination and deterioration in quality, particularly in areas with limited water resources [3]. Adsorption has been known to humans for a long time. Purification and separation are two of the most common methods for reducing water contamination by heavy metals. When a material with pores draws a multi-component fluid (gas or liquid) to its surface through physical or chemical interactions, the process is called adsorption. A high micropore volume in a solid porous material increases its adsorptive capacity. Adsorbate molecules must cross the microspore volume of the porous solid medium, which has small pores. It is imperative that the adsorbent possesses excellent adsorption capacity and kinetics, as adsorption efficiency is dependent on these properties. Materials that can adsorb substances with very small pores, moderate porosity, large microspore volume, and extensive pore networking allow molecules to access the interior, aiding adsorption [4].
Therefore, developing highly effective techniques to treat water contaminated with heavy metals, particularly industrial effluents, has become a critical priority for safeguarding aquatic ecosystems. Heavy metal species in water can be classified into two main categories based on their coordination structure: the unstable state and the stable state. When weak ligands like H2O and Cl are present, the coordination structures of heavy metal ions are weakened, which is why they are so susceptible to environmental influences. Thus, these volatile heavy metals can be easily removed using conventional methods such as ion exchange, adsorption, and alkaline precipitation [5]. Radioactive and toxic waste containing metals is accumulating at an alarming rate due to the proliferation of nuclear power and conventional industries. The increasing discharge of industrial effluents, proliferation of human habitation, persistence of urbanization, use of technology, and other human-caused phenomena frequently lead to the contamination of aquatic streams. Because of the adverse effects on human health caused by the accumulation of dangerous components in the food chain, the elimination of these pollutants has been examined and assessed using more effective and advanced methods [6].
The adsorption process using porous materials is widely regarded as a superior method for water purification due to its cost-effectiveness, operational simplicity, design simplicity, straightforward design, environmentally friendly characteristics, and high efficiency [7,8]. Hence, it is necessary to remove them from the environment in order to reduce their negative impacts and maintain their concentration levels that are safe for living organisms. To achieve this objective, numerous metal treatment techniques have been thoroughly studied, including electrodeposition, ion exchange, chemical precipitation, coagulation, adsorption, and membrane filtering. For wastewaters with low concentrations of metals, sorption is frequently considered the most cost-effective alternative treatment option [9]. Hence, the efficient elimination of this hazardous metal from wastewater or polluted water is of utmost significance and constitutes a critical concern from environmental, health, and economic perspectives. Consequently, it is essential to discover methods to eliminate it [10].
Adsorption technology has been identified as the best option after a thorough evaluation due to its high efficiency, low operating costs, and ease of use [11]. Additionally, adsorbent materials that successfully remove metal ions from polluted water have been produced using chelating agents [12].
Radionuclide removal from water streams is crucial for removing metal ions from wastewater for chemical analysis or lowering metal concentrations to values below toxicity thresholds. Chemists around the world are interested in selectively removing Cs+ and Co2+ from solutions, particularly at low concentrations, due to their significance in treating radioactive liquid effluents [13], then immobilize the collected radiocontaminants in cementitious materials [14,15,16,17].
Cesium and cobalt have been effectively removed through adsorption, which can be achieved using either natural or synthetic materials. As traditional adsorbents, ion exchangers have limitations when it comes to dealing with liquid radioactive waste since they compete with other monovalent cations like potassium and sodium. Cesium and other divalent cations that compete for cobalt adsorption sites may have their efforts thwarted by this competition. The development of new, environmentally friendly materials that are highly effective at removing stable or radioactive pollutants from wastewater is a pressing need due to the increasing demand for cation exchange sites for metal adsorption [18]. The adsorption of Cs+ ions in inner-sphere coordination near the smectite surface is favored because of the low hydration energy of Cs+ ions, and their large ionic radius [19].
It is imperative to identify a procedure that can adequately mitigate this type of pollution. Numerous techniques, such as adsorption, have been developed to remove these harmful ions from solutions containing water, chemical reduction, microfiltration, ion exchange, and chemical precipitation. Evidence suggests that adsorption, which employs environmentally friendly materials and lowers costs, is an effective method for ion removal [20].
Among the various adsorbents studied, isatin-derived ligands have demonstrated a high affinity for metal ions due to their unique chelating functional groups and stable coordination structures. The presence of carbonyl and amine groups allows for strong binding interactions with cobalt and cesium ions, enhancing their selectivity and adsorption efficiency. Isatin and its metal complexes are extremely successful in biological and pharmacological applications and are highly sought after in the medical industry. Isatin metal complexes are effective chelating agents because they are simple to synthesize, versatile, and exhibit the distinctive action of the -C=N (azomethine) moiety. They may also form chelates with a range of metal ions and change the ligation features by adjusting basicity and density. In the current study, unlike conventional adsorbents such as activated carbon and zeolites, isatin-derived ligands offer enhanced selectivity for Co2+ and Cs+ due to their specific coordination chemistry. Their high adsorption capacity, chemical stability, and ease of regeneration make them promising candidates for industrial wastewater treatment. This study provides new insights into the adsorption mechanism and highlights the potential of isatin-based materials for addressing heavy metal contamination in challenging industrial effluents.

2. Experimental Approach

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Adsorptive Materials

All metal salts used were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and the Schiff base ligand was previously prepared and crystallized using spectroscopic techniques. The novel 3-(2-mercaptophenylimino)-1,3-dihydro-indol-2-one-based ligand was investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using a Rheometric Scientific STA 1500 instrument from Rheometric Scientific, Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, United States to determine the water content and thermal stability. After the adsorption procedure, the remaining concentrations of Co2+ and Cs+ in the solution were determined using ICP-OES, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (Prodigy High Dispersion ICP, Leeman in the United States).

2.1.2. Preparation of Adsorbent Ligand (HL)

A 20 mL solution of isatin (2.942 g, 0.02 mol) in ethanol was heated with 3-aminothiophenol (3.207 g, 0.02 mol) to produce the Schiff base ligand HL. The mixture was then subjected to a flux bath for four hours to complete the reaction, as shown in Figure 1. An 87% yield of the orange ligand was achieved by collecting the precipitate after chilling it via filtration, processing it through a series of alcohol and ether washes to remove impurities, followed by drying in a desiccator over anhydrous CaCl2. The experimental procedure for synthesizing the adsorbent ligand (HL) is described in detail in a recent study by the authors [21].

2.1.3. Adsorbate Elements

High-purity analytical-grade cesium and cobalt salts were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The concentrations of the stable elements were diluted to a range of 5–100 mg/L to obtain suitable values for subsequent tests. Furthermore, to adjust the solutions to various pH values, the acidity or alkalinity was modified by adding NaOH and 0.1 N HCl in a stepwise manner. The radioactive isotopes 134Cs and 60Co were produced by the Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority in Egypt.

2.2. Experimentation

2.2.1. Analyses of Adsorption

All experiments were performed in a bathwater solution with a constant shaking speed to examine the impact of temperature, pH value, adsorbent weight, concentration of Cs+ or Co2+, and contact time as shown in Figure 2.
Under equilibrium conditions, in proportion to the number of adsorbed ions that have been eliminated, the quantity of ligand (HL) was determined using Equation (1) [22]. The Langmuir isotherms under equilibrium conditions were expressed using the Hanes-Woolf equation, as shown in Equation (2) [23].
q = ( C C ) × V m  
C e q e = 1   K L × q m a x + C e q m a x
An alternative absorption model, the Freundlich adsorption model, was employed (Equation (3)). According to Equation (3), this model is valuable in demonstrating that the adsorption energy value on a uniform surface is not influenced by the extent of the surface coverage.
q = K f × C e 1 / n
C0 is the initial ion concentration, Ce is the equilibrium concentration, m is the adsorbent mass, V is the solution volume, and qe is the quantity of ions adsorbed on the ligand (HL).
The Langmuir constant (KL) that relates to the adsorption energy value, and the maximum number of ions adsorbed on the surface of the ligand (qmax) are both utilized. We calculated qmax and KL by analyzing the slope and crossing intercept of the plot of Ce/qe versus Ce, respectively.
Where Kf is the Freudenberg model constant (mg/g), n is the adsorption intensity, Ce is the remaining concentration (mg/L at equilibrium), and qe is the amount of ions adsorbed onto the ligand (HL) at equilibrium [24].

Contact Time

This experiment aimed to determine the influence of time on the adsorption of Cs+ or Co2+ ions (50 mg/L) onto the ligand and its metal complexes (0.1 g). A constant temperature of 25 °C, pH value of 7, and shaking speed of 100 rpm were utilized to conduct studies for a range of two-hour durations (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min). The concentration of non-adsorbed ions in 1 mL of the transparent solution was measured at each contact period using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer.

pH Effect

After 60 min, 0.1 g of the complexes (ligand and its metal complexes) were extracted to evaluate the elimination efficiency of both ions at a concentration of 50 mg/L across a range of pH values from 2 to 8. The elimination efficiency of both ions (50 mg/L concentration) at different pH levels (2 to 8) was assessed by extracting 0.1 g of complexes (ligand and its metal complexes) after 60 min.

Adsorbent Dose

Six bottles containing 100 mL of Cs+ or Co2+ were mixed with seven different weights of dry ligand (HL) at a temperature of 25 °C: 0.025, 0.05, 0.07, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.3 g. We used a 100 rpm shaker to agitate the bottles, with a pH value of 7 for Cs+ and 6 for Co2+, for a duration of 60 min. Next, a volume of 1 mL was taken from each bottle and examined to ascertain the residual concentration of each component remaining following the completion of the process.

2.2.2. Optical Emissions Spectroscopy with Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP-OES)

Using the Prodigy High Dispersion ICP apparatus from Leman in the US, the initial concentrations of Co and Cs, along with the concentration of the remaining metal in the solution, were calculated using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The apparatus used nebulization to transform liquid into an aerosol. Following this, the aerosol sample was transported to the plasma and subjected to several processes, such as desolvation, vaporization, atomization, excitation, and ionization. Using a gadget, the spectral radiation that energized atoms and ions produced was collected and organized by wavelength [25].
The control of analytical reagent blank levels, instrument sensitivity, memory effects, interferences in the spectrum, cleanliness of the digesting vessel, and other factors were largely considered while determining the limit of detection (LOD). Determining the lowest quantities that are reliably detectable and quantifiable is within reach.
To determine the Limits of Detection (LODs) for each element, we multiplied the multi-run reagent blank solutions (3% v/v HNO3, including internal standard pulses) by dividing the standard deviation of the ion counts by three times the concentration [26]. Here are some aspects of ICP-OES: Three different views (radial, axial, and dual) are at your disposal; ranging from 165 to 1100 nanometers in wavelength; precision less than 0.008 nm; Superb elemental ratio readings with a relative standard deviation of only 0.01–0.02 percent.

2.2.3. Adsorption Isotherms and Data Analysis

For contact lengths of 45 and 90 min, respectively, the adsorption isotherms for Cs and Co ions were estimated using different temperatures, constant pH, and shaking speed (pH = 7, 100 rpm). Various beginning concentrations (Co) of Cs or Co ions were added to 100 mL of 100 mL HL at temperatures of 25, 35, 45, and 55 degrees Celsius, respectively, until equilibrium was reached. The initial concentrations were 10, 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg/L. Using atomic absorption equipment, a 1 mL portion of the remaining clear solution was examined to identify the ions that were not adsorbed under different conditions.
Kinetic studies in pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intra-particular diffusion were conducted using batch data from different contact durations and initial metal ion concentrations.
Ion adsorption potentials were also studied by employing several isothermal absorption models, such as the “Langmuir” and “Freundlich” methods.

2.2.4. Adsorption of Radioisotopes (60Co or 134Cs)

Various starting activity concentrations of 134Cs (1400 to 4350 Bq) and 60Co (3800 to 11,000 Bq) were used in 50 mL solutions to monitor the absorption processes at a constant room temperature. The experiment relied on a range of adsorbent concentrations (0.05, 0.07, 0.1, and 0.15 g) employed as ligands (HL) in conjunction with 60Co and 134Cs. The conditions included a 120 min contact duration, uniform shaking at 100 rpm, and a constant pH value of 7. A multichannel analyzer with a NaI detector, manufactured in Europe by PCAP, was used to regularly measure the radioactivity level of the residual solution in order to evaluate the elimination of radionuclides.

2.2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and regression models using the statistical tool SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Ver. 19.0 Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.). When comparing several groups, we utilized multivariate ANOVA and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. When the alpha probability was less than 0.05, we concluded that there were statistically significant differences.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterization of the Synthesized Materials

Information about the infrared spectra of the ligand HLwas obtained from previously published works. To determine which coordination sites may be involved in chelation, the complex infrared spectra were compared to those of the free ligand’s (see Figure 3). The spectra of the ligands exhibited several significant peaks that served as useful indicators for achieving this objective. Anticipated chelation is likely to induce changes in the location and/or magnitude of these peaks.
The infrared spectra of the ligands show a distinct peak at 1625 cm−1, attributed to the v (C=N) frequency of the azomethine group. In all the metal complexes, this band was shifted to a range of 1687–1675 cm−1, with a shift of 50–62 cm−1. This shift suggests that the azomethine nitrogen coordinates with the metal atom [27]. Another notable distinction is the shift in the characteristic vibrations associated with the (C=O) unit of the isatin moiety from 1705 to 1755–1778 cm−1. It appears that the oxygen atoms in the ligand HL, were used to coordinate the metal ions, as this change was very noticeable [28].
In the complexes, the band at 2831 cm−1, which corresponds to the (S-H) bond, was weaker than that in the ligand spectra, indicating that the thiol sulfur was involved in its deprotonated form. The displacement of the symmetric bands to 742–715 cm−1 and the asymmetric bands to 820–806 cm−1 provides further evidence that the thiol sulfur atom is involved in the formation of the complexes [29].
Infrared spectra of the ligand HL exhibited a prominent and distinct band at 3309 cm−1, attributed to the NH moiety. This band remained unchanged in the complexes, suggesting that NH did not participate in coordination. A band between 3502 and 3448 cm−1 was observed, confirming the presence of coordinated water molecules in the complexes.
As shown in Figure 4, there are two distinct phases in the breakdown of the ligand (HL) in the TGA data, which occur between 260 and 561 °C. In the first stage, (2C4H4, CN, SO) molecules are lost at temperatures between 260 and 289 °C, with a mass loss of around 70.78% (calculated 70.38%). The second one involves the mass loss of (C2H2,1/2N2) molecules between 535 and 561 °C, which is estimated to be 15.67% (calculated to be 15.72%). remains after calculating the total weight reduction, which is 13.54% (or 14.01%).

3.2. Contact Time

At the maximum adsorption value, the equilibrium point was largely determined by the contact period. When evaluating different adsorption concentrations, the length of time required to achieve the highest removal percentage is known as the optimal contact time [30]. Under controlled conditions of constant pH (7) and temperature (25 °C), the adsorption capabilities of both ions (Cs+ and Co2+) on the complexes were investigated. Figure 5 shows that initially, the rate of adsorption increases with increasing contact length. The ions that have been adsorbed form aggregates, which allow them to slowly but surely reach higher energy sites within the adsorbent structure. After this point, the prices will remain the same. By reducing the diffusion of aggregated ions in the adsorbents, the pore filling process diminishes the impact of contact time [31]. However, after 120 min and 60 min, respectively, the maximal sorption capacity was reached, leading to an enhanced elimination efficiency. For the sorption of Cs+, the optimal period was 120 min of contact, while for the sorption of Co2+, it was 60 min. Sorption rates are directly proportional to the biosorbent mass, since an increase in the biosorbent mass results in an increase in the number of sorption sites.
Both pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, as illustrated in Equations (4) and (5), were built using the computed adsorption/time data.
log q e q t = log q e k 1 2.303   t
t q e = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
If the pseudo-first-order rate constant of adsorption is kl (min−1), then the number of ions adsorbed at equilibrium is qe (mg/g) and the number adsorbed at time t is qt (mg/g). K2 (g mg−1 min−1) is the empirical value for the pseudo-second-order adsorption rate constant.
The appropriate model was assessed by computing the straight-line correction coefficient (R2). Figure 6a shows that compared to the pseudo-first-order model, the pseudo-second-order model had an identical regression coefficient (R2). As a result, pseudo-second-order events involving the adsorption of Cs+ ions were identical to pseudo-first-order ones. Additionally, it appears that the adsorption of Co2+ ions processes are identical to the second-order model than the first-order model, as indicated by the greater value of the regression coefficient (R2) for the pseudo-second-order model in Figure 6b. [32].
(a)
Cs+ adsorption; the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, showing a linear relationship with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9691, indicating good fitting to the model but suggesting that the adsorption rate is relatively slow. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model, which exhibits an excellent fit with R2 = 0.9899, suggests that Cs+ adsorption follows a chemisorption mechanism dominated by valence forces or electron sharing.
(b)
Co2+ adsorption; the pseudo-first-order model with an R2 value of 0.9884, indicating reasonable fitting but showing a negative slope, which might reflect a desorption tendency or low interaction strength. The pseudo-second-order model, showing a perfect linear fit (R2 = 1), suggests that Co2+ adsorption is highly consistent with a chemisorption mechanism, indicating strong binding between the ligand and Co2+ ions. These results confirm that the adsorption of both Cs+ and Co2+ is better described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, implying that chemical interactions are the primary driving force for metal ion uptake.

3.3. pH Effect

A critical parameter for adsorption processes is pH, as H+ ions impact the sorption of Cs+ and Co2+ ions in the complexes. [33]. Figure 7 shows that between 2 and 8, the adsorbent surface characteristics and the relative distribution of ions in the solution are significantly affected by pH. The adsorption of the complexes was greatly influenced by the various solution pH values; it was found to be practically constant for the Co solution and to rise sharply from 3 to 5 pH. After reaching a maximum at pH 7, the Cs solution elimination capability rapidly declined at pH levels higher than 7.0. Lower pH levels hinder the adsorption of Cs+ and Co2+ ions due to competition for the limited number of adsorption sites, which explains the observed behavior. Some heavy elements are more soluble in water under low pH conditions, which improves their dispersion. Heavy metal migration across the liquid and solid phases is highly dependent on the optimal pH [34]. Increasing the pH of a solution is another factor that could improve metal ion adsorption since it makes it easier to precipitate metal ions as hydroxides [35]. Experiments at different pH levels revealed that the sorption process was most effective at pH 6.3 for Cs+ and pH 5 for Co2+.

3.4. Dosage Weight of Dried Ligand (HL)

Economic considerations necessitate the use of complex chemicals and the execution of several tests, thereby increasing the overall cost. Consequently, it is necessary to incorporate economic cost with efficiency in order to effectively eliminate pollutants. A comprehensive grasp of how the dosage of an adsorbent impact’s adsorption is crucial for achieving optimal adsorbent utilization. Figure 8 illustrates the batch experiments conducted to determine the most effective adsorbent dosage by varying the quantities of ligand (HL). Co and Cs exhibited a positive correlation between the adsorbent dosage and adsorption capacity (qe), which remained consistently high. Undoubtedly, the number of adsorption sites and surface area can be increased by increasing the dosage of the adsorbent. Therefore, the increase in active sites is proportional to the improvement in clearance with increasing dosage [36].
The decrease in removal at a high dosage could be attributed to the aggregation of adsorbent particles, and the subsequent continuous removal serves as an indication of adsorption equilibrium [37].

3.5. Comparison of the Study Findings with Other Similar Published Work

The adsorption process and its many adsorbent types have been the subject of substantial scholarly investigation regarding their environmental and financial impacts. In order to determine their adsorption capability, the adsorbents listed in Table 1 were compared to the ligand (HL) that was used in the study for each of the two ions.
The adsorption capacities vary across different studies according to various factors, such as the material’s surface area, porosity, functional groups, pH, temperature, and metal ion competition. Analyzing these parameters would provide a deeper understanding of the adsorption mechanisms and material performance.

3.6. Adsorption Isotherm at Different Temperatures

The results show that at 55 °C and 35 °C, respectively, the adsorption behavior reached its maximum uptake values for Cs+ and Co2+, as shown in Figure 9. A larger radius (Cs) ion has a competitive advantage over a smaller one (Co) because the cation’s interaction energies with water molecules across layers and with the charges on the biomass layer’s surface are different [52]. There is some evidence from the Cs experiment that the cation diffusion coefficient changes with temperature.
1 q e = 1 k L q m a x C e + 1 q m a x
If we choose qe to be the uptake at equilibrium concentration (in mg/g), and Ce to be the concentration at which Ce is present (in mg/L), and qmax to be the maximum number of ions needed to form a monolayer (in mg/g), then the equilibrium data were analyzed using the linearized Langmuir adsorption isotherm, as shown in Figure 10.
Table 2 displays the Langmuir constants (KL) and monolayer sorption capacity (qmax) that were computed using the slope and intercept of the curve that passed through 1/qe and 1/Ce. Langmuir plots yielded quantum maximum (qmax) values that disagree with the experimental data [53].
An empirical equation used to define heterogeneous schemes is the Freundlich isotherm. The “Freundlich” equation is represented as
l n q e = l n K f + 1 n l n C e
Equation (7) provides the linear formulation of the Freundlich equation, with Kf and n being the Freundlich constants. The degree of favorable adsorption progression is represented by n, and the adsorption capacity is Kf (mg/g (L/mg) 1/n). A positive value for the exponent, 1/n, indicates a favorable adsorption environment for the adsorbate. If n is greater than 1, the adsorption conditions are favorable. Table 3 shows the calculated Kf and n values from the curves in Figure 11, using their intercept and slope, respectively. The R2 values were the same for both the Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms, suggesting that the adsorption processes for Co2+ and Cs+ ions followed a similar behavior at all temperatures [54].
Processing kf values at varying temperatures in accordance with the van’t Hoff Equation (8) allowed us to obtain the thermodynamic characteristics of the adsorption reaction:
ln K 2 K 1 = H 0 R ( 1 T 2 1 T 1 )
where R is the gas constant, and the changes in enthalpy and entropy are denoted as ∆H0 (KJ.mol−1) and ∆S0 (KJ.mol.k−1), respectively. Figure 12 shows that when graphing kf versus 1/T, a linear relationship with a slope of −∆H0/R and an intercept of ∆S0/R is formed. Table 4 shows the computed values of ∆H0 and ∆S0 for the samples.
The endothermic adsorption of Co2+ ions is indicated by positive values of ∆H0, whereas the exothermic adsorption of Cs+ is indicated by negative values. Equation (9) was used to estimate the Gibbs free energy of adsorption, as shown in Table 4.
As shown in Table 4, there was minimal variation in T∆S0 at all temperatures for Co2+ ions, and T∆S0 < ∆H0. These results suggest that enthalpy, rather than entropy, is the primary factor influencing adsorption. The positive ∆G0 values discovered provide support for the prior theory’s postulation that the adsorption process is not spontaneous [55]. The fact that T∆S0 > ∆H0 suggests that the adsorption process for Cs+ is defined by an entropic alteration instead of an enthalpic one. The positive value of ∆G0 indicates that the Cs+ ion adsorption process was not spontaneous.
G o = H o T S o

3.7. Adsorption of Radioisotopes (60Co and 134Cs) on Ligand (HL)

Figure 13 shows the adsorption of radioactive cesium and cobalt. At equilibrium, the efficacy of removal is constant, but it increased with time. After 120 min, the elimination rates of 60Co using various weights of ligand-based (0.05, 0.07, 0.1, and 0.15 g) were 94%, 95%, 97%, and 99%, respectively. The elimination rate of 134Cs after 120 min with varying weights of ligand-based (0.05, 0.07, 0.1, and 0.15 g) ranged from 77% to 86%. Since radioactive and stable elements are chemically indistinguishable, the adsorption pattern observed in this study is consistent with that of a previous study on radioisotopes [56]. Because cesium and cobalt have intrinsically different radii, the biosorbent surface experiences slower diffusive mobility of 134Cs from the solution to its surface in aqueous conditions compared to 60Co [57].
It could be stated from the current study and previous studies that the higher adsorption capacity for Co2+ over Cs+ could be due to many reasons such as a small ionic radius of Co2+ that enhance move through pores more easily than larger Cs+, high charge density of Co2+ that strongly impose its electrostatic interactions and binding affinity, achieve more stable bonds with adsorption sites due to stronger inner-sphere complexes of Co2+ or the high mobility of Co2+ that accelerate the diffusion and adsorption kinetics [18,44].

4. Conclusions

This work presents a comprehensive study of the elimination of Co2+ and Cs+ ions using the ligand (HL) as an effective adsorbent. The adsorption capacities reached 96% and 99% for ligand quantities of 0.2 g and 0.3 g, respectively. The degree of adsorption onto the ligand (HL) was slightly higher for Co2+ than for Cs+ in wastewater, highlighting the ligand selectivity toward divalent ions. pH tests revealed that the most significant sorption occured at a pH of 4 for Co2+ and 6.3 for Cs+, demonstrating that the adsorption mechanism was pH-dependent. The optimal contact durations for maximum sorption efficiency were determined to be 60 min for Co2+ and 120 min for Cs+. Furthermore, the increase in the biosorbent mass directly enhanced the sorption capacity due to the increased availability of active sites. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacities (qmax) for Co2+ and Cs+ were 62.11 mg/g and 15.10 mg/g, respectively. The adsorption data were well described by both the Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models, with correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. These findings confirm that the ligand (HL) exhibits a strong binding capacity and high efficiency for the removal of Co2+ and Cs+ ions, making it a promising candidate for practical wastewater treatment. Future work should focus on enhancing the ligand adsorption capacity and selectivity by modifying the functional groups, improving the structural stability, and developing composite materials. Investigating reusability, real-world wastewater performance, and economic feasibility will help optimize ligands for practical applications.

Author Contributions

R.N.K.: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing—original draft; A.A.F.: Supervision; S.S.I.: Supervision; Z.A.E.-S.: Supervision; H.M.S.: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Monier, M.; Youssef, I.; El-Mekabaty, A. Preparation of Functionalized Ion-Imprinted Phenolic Polymer for Efficient Removal of Copper Ions. Polym. Int. 2020, 69, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ren, Z.; Zhu, X.; Du, J.; Kong, D.; Wang, N.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Liu, W.; Li, Q.; Zhou, Z. Facile and Green Preparation of Novel Adsorption Materials by Combining Sol-Gel with Ion Imprinting Technology for Selective Removal of Cu(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 574–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Atubi, A.O. Effects of Warri Refinery Effluents on Water Quality from the Iffie River, Delta State, Nigeria. Am. Rev. Polit. Econ. 2011, 9, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Da’ana, D.A. Guidelines for the Use and Interpretation of Adsorption Isotherm Models: A Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Li, X.; Huang, X. A Critical Review on Chemical Analysis of Heavy Metal Complexes in Water/Wastewater and the Mechanism of Treatment Methods. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 131688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saleh, H.M.; Moussa, H.R.; Mahmoud, H.H.; El-Saied, F.A.; Dawoud, M.; Abdel Wahed, R.S. Potential of the Submerged Plant Myriophyllum Spicatum for Treatment of Aquatic Environments Contaminated with Stable or Radioactive Cobalt and Cesium. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2020, 118, 103147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Soni, S.; Bajpai, P.K.; Mittal, J.; Arora, C. Utilisation of Cobalt Doped Iron Based MOF for Enhanced Removal and Recovery of Methylene Blue Dye from Waste Water. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 314, 113642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maazinejad, B.; Mohammadnia, O.; Ali, G.A.M.; Makhlouf, A.S.H.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Sillanpää, M.; Asiri, A.M.; Agarwal, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Sadegh, H. Taguchi L9 (34) Orthogonal Array Study Based on Methylene Blue Removal by Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes-Amine: Adsorption Optimization Using the Experimental Design Method, Kinetics, Equilibrium and Thermodynamics. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 298, 112001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beyki, M.H.; Shemirani, F.; Shirkhodaie, M. Aqueous Co(II) Adsorption Using 8-Hydroxyquinoline Anchored γ-Fe2O3@ Chitosan with Co(II) as Imprinted Ions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 87, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dil, N.N.; Sadeghi, M. Free Radical Synthesis of Nanosilver/Gelatin-Poly (Acrylic Acid) Nanocomposite Hydrogels Employed for Antibacterial Activity and Removal of Cu(II) Metal Ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 351, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cai, Y.; Li, C.; Wu, D.; Wang, W.; Tan, F.; Wang, X.; Wong, P.K.; Qiao, X. Highly Active MgO Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Bacterial Inactivation and Heavy Metal Removal from Aqueous Solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 312, 158–166. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chowdhury, M.N.K.; Khan, M.W.; Mina, M.F.; Beg, M.D.H.; Khan, M.R.; Alam, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Radiation Grafted Films for Removal of Arsenic and Some Heavy Metals from Contaminated Water. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1606–1611. [Google Scholar]
  13. Al Abdullah, J.; Al Lafi, A.G.; Al Masri, W.; Amin, Y.; Alnama, T. Adsorption of Cesium, Cobalt, and Lead onto a Synthetic Nano Manganese Oxide: Behavior and Mechanism. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eskander, S.B.; Saleh, H.M. Cement mortar-degraded spinney waste composite as a matrix for immobilizing some low and intermediate level radioactive wastes: Consistency under frost attack. J. Nucl. Mater. 2012, 420, 491–496. [Google Scholar]
  15. Saleh, H.M.; Eskander, S.B. Characterizations of mortar-degraded spinney waste composite nominated as solidifying agent for radwastes due to immersion processes. J. Nucl. Mater. 2012, 430, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  16. Saleh, H.M.; Eskander, S.B. Long-term effect on the solidified degraded cellulose-based waste slurry in cement matrix. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2009, 14, 291–297. [Google Scholar]
  17. Saleh, H.M. Some Applications of Clays in Radioactive Waste Management. In Clays and Clay Minerals: Geological Origin, Mechanical Properties and Industrial Applications; Wesley, L.R., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 403–415. [Google Scholar]
  18. Abdelhamid, A.A.; Badr, M.H.; Mohamed, R.A.; Saleh, H.M. Using Agricultural Mixed Waste as a Sustainable Technique for Removing Stable Isotopes and Radioisotopes from the Aquatic Environment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, B.; Li, J.; Li, T.; Shao, X.; Cai, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Ion Adsorption and Ligand Exchange on an Orthoclase Surface. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 14952–14962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dehghani, A.; Bahlakeh, G.; Ramezanzadeh, B.; Ramezanzadeh, M. Detailed Macro-/Micro-Scale Exploration of the Excellent Active Corrosion Inhibition of a Novel Environmentally Friendly Green Inhibitor for Carbon Steel in Acidic Environments. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 100, 239–261. [Google Scholar]
  21. Khalaf, R.N.; Hassan, A.I.; El-Shafiey, Z.A.; Faheim, A.A.; Ibrahim, S.S.; Saleh, H.M. Evaluation of an Isatin-Derived Ligand and Its Metal Complexes as Potential Anticancer Agents in Breast Adenocarcinoma Cells. Chem. Pap. 2025, 79, 1539–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tighadouini, S.; Radi, S.; Roby, O.; Hammoudan, I.; Saddik, R.; Garcia, Y.; Almarhoon, Z.M.; Mabkhot, Y.N. Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Equilibrium, Surface Modelling, and Atomic Absorption Analysis of Selective Cu(Ii) Removal from Aqueous Solutions and Rivers Water Using Silica-2-(Pyridin-2-Ylmethoxy)Ethan-1-Ol Hybrid Material. RSC Adv. 2021, 12, 611–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Misak, N.Z. Langmuir isotherm and its application in ion-exchange reactions. React. Polym. 1993, 21, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benjelloun, M.; Miyah, Y.; Evrendilek, G.A.; Zerrouq, F.; Lairini, S. Recent Advances in Adsorption Kinetic Models: Their Application to Dye Types. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thermo Fisher Scientific. ICP-OES Technical Guide: Principles and Instrumentation; Thermo Fisher White Paper. 2019. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com (accessed on 25 March 2025).
  26. Liu, Y.; Diwu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Yuan, H.; Wang, J. Determination of Trace and Rare-Earth Elements in Chinese Soil and Clay Reference Materials by ICP-MS. Chin. J. Geochem. 2014, 33, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nasri, S.; Guergueb, M.; Brahmi, J.; Al-Ghamdi, Y.O.; Molton, F.; Loiseau, F.; Turowska-Tyrk, I.; Nasri, H. Synthesis of New Cobalt(III) Meso-Porphyrin Complex, Photochemical, X-Ray Diffraction, and Electrical Properties for Photovoltaic Cells. Molecules 2022, 27, 8866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saad, F.A.; Al-Fahemi, J.H.; El-Ghamry, H.; Khedr, A.M.; Elghalban, M.G.; El-Metwaly, N.M. Elaborated Spectral, Modeling, QSAR, Docking, Thermal, Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activity Studies for New Nanosized Metal Ion Complexes Derived from Sulfamerazine Azodye. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 131, 1249–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hadjiivanov, K.I.; Panayotov, D.A.; Mihaylov, M.Y.; Ivanova, E.Z.; Chakarova, K.K.; Andonova, S.M.; Drenchev, N.L. Power of infrared and Raman spectroscopies to characterize metal-organic frameworks and investigate their interaction with guest molecules. Chem. Rev. 2020, 121, 1286–1424. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fakoya, T.O.; Oyekunle, J.A.O.; Adekunle, A.S.; Oyinloye, A.J.; Ejidike, I.P. Removal of Hexachlorocyclohexane Isomers from Wastewater Using Activated Carbon from Musa Paradisiaca Peel: Adsorption Isotherms, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies. Chem. Thermodyn. Therm. Anal. 2024, 15, 100140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Svobodová, E.; Tišler, Z.; Peroutková, K.; Strejcová, K.; Abrham, J.; Šimek, J.; Gholami, Z.; Vakili, M. Adsorption of Cu(II) and Ni(II) from Aqueous Solutions Using Synthesized Alkali-Activated Foamed Zeolite Adsorbent: Isotherm, Kinetic, and Regeneration Study. Molecules 2024, 29, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ghanavati, B.; Bozorgian, A.; Ghanavati, J. Removal of Copper (II) Ions from the Effluent by Carbon Nanotubes Modified with Tetrahydrofuran. Chem. Rev. Lett. 2022, 5, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, Z.; Xing, Y.; Ren, A.; Ma, D.; Li, Y.; Hu, S. Study on Adsorption Properties of Water Hyacinth-Derived Biochar for Uranium (VI). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020, 324, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hanaf, R.A.K. Effect of Salinity and PH on the Absorption of Cadmium in Lemna Minor. Int. J. Aquat. Biol. 2021, 9, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adeolu, A.T.; Okareh, O.T.; Dada, A.O. Adsorption of Chromium Ion from Industrial Effluent Using Activated Carbon Derived from Plantain (Musa paradisiaca) Wastes. Am J Env. Prot. 2016, 4, 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sartape, A.S.; Mandhare, A.M.; Jadhav, V.V.; Raut, P.D.; Anuse, M.A.; Kolekar, S.S. Removal of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solution with Adsorption Technique Using Limonia Acidissima (Wood Apple) Shell as Low Cost Adsorbent. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S3229–S3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khodaie, M.; Ghasemi, N.; Moradi, B.; Rahimi, M. Removal of Methylene Blue from Wastewater by Adsorption onto Znclactivated Corn Husk Carbon Equilibrium Studies. J. Chem. 2013, 383985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yavuz, Ö.; Altunkaynak, Y.; Güzel, F. Removal of Copper, Nickel, Cobalt and Manganese from Aqueous Solution by Kaolinite. Water Res. 2003, 37, 948–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rawat, J.P.; Iraqi, S.M.U.; Singh, R.P. Sorption Equilibria of Cobalt(II) on Two Types of Indian Soils-The Natural Ion Exchangers. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1996, 117, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Iyer, A.; Mody, K.; Jha, B. Sorption of Heavy Metals by a Marine Bacterium. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 50, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. van Hullebusch, E.D.; Peerbolte, A.; Zandvoort, M.H.; Lens, P.N.L. Sorption of Cobalt and Nickel on Anaerobic Granular Sludges: Isotherms and Sequential Extraction. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Parab, H.; Joshi, S.; Shenoy, N.; Lali, A.; Sarma, U.S.; Sudersanan, M. Determination of Kinetic and Equilibrium Parameters of the Batch Adsorption of Co(II), Cr(III) and Ni(II) onto Coir Pith. Process. Biochem. 2006, 41, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vijayaraghavan, K.; Jegan, J.; Palanivelu, K.; Velan, M. Sorption of Cobalt(II) and Nickel(II) by Seaweeds: Batch and Column Studies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 44, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saleh, H.M.; Moussa, H.R.; El-Saied, F.A.; Dawoud, M.; Nouh, E.S.A.; Wahed, R.S.A. Adsorption of Cesium and Cobalt onto Dried Myriophyllum spicatum L. from Radio-Contaminated Water: Experimental and Theoretical Study. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2020, 125, 103393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miah, M.Y.; Volchek, K.; Kuang, W.; Tezel, F.H. Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies of Cesium Adsorption on Ceiling Tiles from Aqueous Solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 712–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, T.-H.; Li, M.-H.; Yeh, W.-C.; Wei, Y.-Y.; Teng, S.-P. Removal of Cesium Ions from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption onto Local Taiwan Laterite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160, 638–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Melkior, T.; Yahiaoui, S.; Motellier, S.; Thoby, D.; Tevissen, E. Cesium Sorption and Diffusion in Bure Mudrock Samples. Appl. Clay Sci. 2005, 29, 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ding, D.; Lei, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Efficiency of Transition Metal Modified Akadama Clay on Cesium Removal from Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rani, R.D.; Sasidhar, P. Sorption of cesium on clay colloids: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Aquat. Geochem. 2012, 18, 281–296. [Google Scholar]
  50. Parab, H.; Sudersanan, M. Engineering a Lignocellulosic Biosorbent–Coir Pith for Removal of Cesium from Aqueous Solutions: Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies. Water Res. 2010, 44, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, L.; Liang, W.; Chen, K.; Li, K.; Yan, R. Adsorption properties of cesium by natural Na-bentonite and Ca-bentonite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 5347–5361. [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang, C.; Myshkin, V.F.; Khan, V.A.; Poberezhnikov, A.D.; Baraban, A.P. Effect of Temperature on the Diffusion and Sorption of Cations in Clay Vermiculite. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 11596–11605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, X. Modeling of Experimental Adsorption Isotherm Data. Information 2015, 6, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Obayomi, K.S.; Auta, M.; Kovo, A.S. Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of lead (II) onto modified Aloji clay. Desalination Water Treat. 2020, 181, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, K.; Li, Y.; Hu, H. Adsorption characteristics of lead on cotton-stalk-derived activated carbon fibre by steam activation. Desalination Water Treat. 2011, 30.1-3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  56. Win, M.M.M. Synthesis of Nanomaterials for Their Applications in Nuclear Research and Radioisotope Production. Master’s Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dakroury, G.A.R.; Abo-Zahra, S.F.; Hassan, H.S.; Ali, H.E.A. Improvement of the Sorption Behavior of Aluminum Silicate Composite toward 134Cs and 60Co Radionuclides by Non-Living Biomass of Chlorella vulgaris. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 21109–21125. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Preparation of adsorbent ligand (HL).
Figure 1. Preparation of adsorbent ligand (HL).
Appliedchem 05 00008 g001
Figure 2. The removal/adsorption of Co2+ and Cs+ based on ligand (HL) before investigation.
Figure 2. The removal/adsorption of Co2+ and Cs+ based on ligand (HL) before investigation.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the ligand (HL).
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the ligand (HL).
Appliedchem 05 00008 g003
Figure 4. TGA of the ligand (HL).
Figure 4. TGA of the ligand (HL).
Appliedchem 05 00008 g004
Figure 5. Removal (%) of both ions separately using the ligand (HL) during the contact time. Co data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. F (Time) was 22,650, indicating a statistically significant difference at p = 0.0001. Cs Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test; significant differences were defined as p < 0.05. The statistically significant difference F (Time) was 294.90 at p = 0.0001.
Figure 5. Removal (%) of both ions separately using the ligand (HL) during the contact time. Co data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. F (Time) was 22,650, indicating a statistically significant difference at p = 0.0001. Cs Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test; significant differences were defined as p < 0.05. The statistically significant difference F (Time) was 294.90 at p = 0.0001.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g005
Figure 6. Using pseudo-first and pseudo-second orders, the adsorption kinetics of Cs+ and Co2+. (a): Cs+, (b): Co2+.
Figure 6. Using pseudo-first and pseudo-second orders, the adsorption kinetics of Cs+ and Co2+. (a): Cs+, (b): Co2+.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g006
Figure 7. The removal (%) and adsorption capacity (qe) of the two ions in the ligand (HL) trash at various pH levels are shown. Co data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. At p = 0.0001, the difference in F (pH) was statistically significant. Cs data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. At p = 0.0001, the difference in F (pH) was statistically significant.
Figure 7. The removal (%) and adsorption capacity (qe) of the two ions in the ligand (HL) trash at various pH levels are shown. Co data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. At p = 0.0001, the difference in F (pH) was statistically significant. Cs data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. At p = 0.0001, the difference in F (pH) was statistically significant.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g007
Figure 8. The separate removal (%) and adsorption capacity (qe) of the two ions for various loading weights of ligand (HL) are shown. Co data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. At p = 0.0001, the difference F (pH) was statistically noteworthy. Cs data are presented as the mean ± SD, based on five samples (n = 5). Tukey’s post hoc test was used to compare groups using one-way ANOVA. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. A significant difference was observed for F (mass dosage), with an F-value of 20.887 and p-value of 0.0001.
Figure 8. The separate removal (%) and adsorption capacity (qe) of the two ions for various loading weights of ligand (HL) are shown. Co data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a one-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. At p = 0.0001, the difference F (pH) was statistically noteworthy. Cs data are presented as the mean ± SD, based on five samples (n = 5). Tukey’s post hoc test was used to compare groups using one-way ANOVA. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. A significant difference was observed for F (mass dosage), with an F-value of 20.887 and p-value of 0.0001.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g008
Figure 9. Adsorption capacity (qe) of both ions separately on the ligand (HL) at various temperatures. Cs data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a two-way ANOVA, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. F = 5.38, p-value < 0.0001, F (Dose) = 1231, F (Temperature) = 28.07, p-value < 0.0001 is the interaction F-value (Dose * Temperature). Co data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test; significant differences were defined as p < 0.05. The statistically significant difference in F (Temperature) was 216.20 at p = 0.0001.
Figure 9. Adsorption capacity (qe) of both ions separately on the ligand (HL) at various temperatures. Cs data (n = 5) are presented as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a two-way ANOVA, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. F = 5.38, p-value < 0.0001, F (Dose) = 1231, F (Temperature) = 28.07, p-value < 0.0001 is the interaction F-value (Dose * Temperature). Co data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test; significant differences were defined as p < 0.05. The statistically significant difference in F (Temperature) was 216.20 at p = 0.0001.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g009
Figure 10. Adsorption of Cs+ and Co2+ ions on ligand (HL) at different temperatures (Langmuir isotherm). (a): Cs+, (b): Co2+.
Figure 10. Adsorption of Cs+ and Co2+ ions on ligand (HL) at different temperatures (Langmuir isotherm). (a): Cs+, (b): Co2+.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g010
Figure 11. Adsorption of Cs+ and Co2+ ions on ligand (HL) at different temperatures (Freundlich isotherm). (a): Cs+, (b): Co2+.
Figure 11. Adsorption of Cs+ and Co2+ ions on ligand (HL) at different temperatures (Freundlich isotherm). (a): Cs+, (b): Co2+.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g011
Figure 12. Van’t Hoff plots related to the adsorption of both ions separately on the ligand (HL).
Figure 12. Van’t Hoff plots related to the adsorption of both ions separately on the ligand (HL).
Appliedchem 05 00008 g012
Figure 13. Adsorption of 134Cs and 60Co separately on the ligand (HL). The data (n = 5) are expressed as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a two-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. F = 848.58, p-value < 0.0001, Interaction F-value (Dose * Time). Cs data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Interaction F-value (Dose * Time): F = 13.33, p-value < 0.0001; F (Time) = 349.70; and F (Dose) = 41.57, p-value < 0.0001.
Figure 13. Adsorption of 134Cs and 60Co separately on the ligand (HL). The data (n = 5) are expressed as the mean ± SD. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test was used after a two-way ANOVA, and differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05. F = 848.58, p-value < 0.0001, Interaction F-value (Dose * Time). Cs data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Interaction F-value (Dose * Time): F = 13.33, p-value < 0.0001; F (Time) = 349.70; and F (Dose) = 41.57, p-value < 0.0001.
Appliedchem 05 00008 g013
Table 1. Comparison of the adsorption capabilities of ligand (HL) and other previously studied adsorbents.
Table 1. Comparison of the adsorption capabilities of ligand (HL) and other previously studied adsorbents.
MaterialAdsorption Capacity (qe) of Co, (mg/g)Literature
Kaolinite0.92[38]
Soil1.50[39]
Marine bacterium4.38[40]
Nedalco sludge11.71[40]
Eerbeek sludge12.34[41]
Coir pith12.82[42]
Brown seaweed20.63[43]
Myriophyllum spicatum43.40[44]
Mixed waste37.45[18]
Complexes62.11Current study
MaterialAdsorption Capacity (qe) of Cs, (mg/g)Literature
Ceiling tiles0.21[45]
Coal and chitosan3.00[46]
Bure mudrock13.30[47]
Modified akadama clay16.10[48]
Kaolinite clay17.10[49]
Coir pith32.00[50]
Bentonites92.3[51]
Myriophyllum spicatum58.00[44]
Mixed waste48.30[18]
Complexes15.10Current study
Table 2. Value of Langmuir parameters for adsorption of both ions separately on ligand (HL).
Table 2. Value of Langmuir parameters for adsorption of both ions separately on ligand (HL).
Temp.Cs+Co2+
qeqmaxkLR2qeqmaxkLR2
25 °C599.360.0190.98740.06630.11200.0370.908
35 °C57.57.480.0170.96313462.1180.0460.937
45 °C56.57.620.0230.982142.843.8590.1600.868
55 °C6115.100.0120.979142.22424.0960.1590.868
Table 3. Value of Freundlich parameters for adsorption of both ions separately on ligand (HL).
Table 3. Value of Freundlich parameters for adsorption of both ions separately on ligand (HL).
Temp.Cs+Co2+
nKfR2nKfR2
25 °C0.7020.0050.9950.9850.6950.9125
35 °C0.6920.0070.9840.7267.4500.96
45 °C0.640.0030.9770.67160.1400.95
55 °C0.7110.0040.9740.51717.9260.948
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters of adsorption of both ions on ligand (HL).
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters of adsorption of both ions on ligand (HL).
ElementS°∆H°T (K)T∆S°G°
Co2+ 29843.020−8.771
0.14451.81430844.467.884
Endothermic 31845.904.845
32847.3515.014
Cs+−60.829381−8.467809298−18.12729.819
Exothermic 308−18.735410.433
318−19.34379.9732
328−19.95212.0610
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khalaf, R.N.; Ibrahim, S.S.; El-Shafiey, Z.A.; Faheim, A.A.; Saleh, H.M. Removal of Radio and Stable Isotopes of Cobalt and Cesium from Contaminated Aqueous Solutions by Isatin-Derived Ligand. AppliedChem 2025, 5, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedchem5020008

AMA Style

Khalaf RN, Ibrahim SS, El-Shafiey ZA, Faheim AA, Saleh HM. Removal of Radio and Stable Isotopes of Cobalt and Cesium from Contaminated Aqueous Solutions by Isatin-Derived Ligand. AppliedChem. 2025; 5(2):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedchem5020008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khalaf, Riyam N., Sattar S. Ibrahim, Zeinab A. El-Shafiey, Abeer A. Faheim, and Hosam M. Saleh. 2025. "Removal of Radio and Stable Isotopes of Cobalt and Cesium from Contaminated Aqueous Solutions by Isatin-Derived Ligand" AppliedChem 5, no. 2: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedchem5020008

APA Style

Khalaf, R. N., Ibrahim, S. S., El-Shafiey, Z. A., Faheim, A. A., & Saleh, H. M. (2025). Removal of Radio and Stable Isotopes of Cobalt and Cesium from Contaminated Aqueous Solutions by Isatin-Derived Ligand. AppliedChem, 5(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedchem5020008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop