Previous Article in Journal
Seawater Temperature at Harvest Shapes Fillet Proteolytic Activity at Chilled Storage in Three Mediterranean-Farmed Fish
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture

by
Guoxiang Huang
1,*,
Kunlapat Thongkaew
1,2 and
Supapan Chaiprapat
1,2
1
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
2
Smart Industrial Research Center, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aquac. J. 2026, 6(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj6010003
Submission received: 30 October 2025 / Revised: 23 December 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2026 / Published: 30 January 2026

Abstract

Aquatic animal products are vital to global food security and nutrition, necessitating accurate, scalable, and non-destructive methods for quality assessment in aquaculture. Conventional techniques such as dissection and biochemical analysis are invasive, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for real-time or high-throughput decision-making. This review synthesizes six major categories of non-destructive technologies—electrical, spectroscopic, natural sensory, acoustic, radiographic, and infrared and microwave—classified by their underlying sensing mechanisms and therefore differing measurement capabilities and deployment feasibilities. To support objective technology selection, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework was developed using general performance criteria (cost, accuracy, speed, usability) and one decision-critical application-specific criterion (non-invasiveness), and was demonstrated for ovarian maturation staging in mud crabs by ranking 19 candidate techniques. Accuracy had the highest weight (0.416), but non-invasiveness (0.224) and usability (0.197) substantially influenced the final ranking, illustrating how operational and welfare constraints could shift preferred solutions despite differences in analytical accuracy. Based on the global priority weights (GA), computer vision (CV) was identified as the most suitable option (GA = 0.076), balancing affordability, throughput, ease of deployment, and animal welfare compatibility, whereas high-end modalities such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR; GA = 0.073) and computed tomography (CT; GA = 0.070) were constrained by cost and operational complexity. Overall, this review–AHP–case study pipeline provides a transparent and reproducible decision-support basis for selecting non-destructive technologies across aquaculture species and quality targets.
Keywords: aquaculture; non-destructive evaluation; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); quality assessment aquaculture; non-destructive evaluation; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); quality assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, G.; Thongkaew, K.; Chaiprapat, S. A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture. Aquac. J. 2026, 6, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj6010003

AMA Style

Huang G, Thongkaew K, Chaiprapat S. A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture. Aquaculture Journal. 2026; 6(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj6010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Guoxiang, Kunlapat Thongkaew, and Supapan Chaiprapat. 2026. "A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture" Aquaculture Journal 6, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj6010003

APA Style

Huang, G., Thongkaew, K., & Chaiprapat, S. (2026). A Review of Non-Destructive Technologies for Quality Assessment in Aquaculture. Aquaculture Journal, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj6010003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop