Next Article in Journal
Modelling the Photodegradation of Marine Microplastics by Means of Infrared Spectrometry and Chemometric Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Microplastics Occurrence in Two Mountainous Rivers in the Lowland Area—A Case Study of the Central Pomeranian Region, Poland
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microplastics
Volume 1
Issue 1
10.3390/microplastics1010012
microplastics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ingested Microplastics in 18 Local Fish Species from the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea

by
Mel Constant
1,2,*,
Mathieu Reynaud
1,2,
Lisa Weiss
1,2,
Wolfgang Ludwig
1,2 and
Philippe Kerhervé
1,2
1
Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, UMR 5110, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, F-66860 Perpignan, France
2
Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, UMR 5110, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, F-66860 Perpignan, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microplastics 2022, 1(1), 186-197; https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics1010012
Submission received: 25 January 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2022 / Accepted: 18 February 2022 / Published: 1 March 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plastic waste and its fragments (microplastics, <5 mm) are a global, persistent, and ubiquitous threat for land and marine ecosystems. We have investigated the occurrence and composition of microplastics within 18 coastal fish species of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Digestive tracts were digested using hydrogen peroxide, and residues were observed under a stereo-microscope. Suspected microplastics were analyzed with a Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectrometer to confirm its plastic nature and to identify the polymer type. A rigorous blank control and FTIR correction was applied, leading to the removal of 78% of the initially sorted and suspected particles. Corrected concentrations range from 0.00 to 5.15 items per fish, a result within the same range than this has been reported for other coastal species previously investigated in this area. Fibers, made of polyester (PES), polyamide (PA), acrylic (A) and polypropylene (PP), largely dominate the microplastic shapes (91%). A single driving force could not be identified, but several species traits (morphology, feeding, and habitat) may influence the number of ingested microplastics.

1. Introduction

Among the wide diversity of materials constituting marine litter (e.g., glass, paper, wood, metal), plastic is the most numerous component found on beaches, sea surfaces and floors [1]. Concerns about marine litter pollution began five decades ago with the discovery of plastics in 74% of stomachs of dead chick Laysan albatrosses (Phoebastria immutabilis) along the isolated islands of Hawaii [2]. Few years later, plastic litter has been described inside a wide range of marine animals, including zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, fishes, birds, top predators and cetaceans [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Contact with marine litter through ingestion or entanglement may induce blockage of the digestive tract, immobility or struggle and lead to death by starvation, predation or injury [9,10]. Marine litter may also affect marine ecosystems by carrying pollutants and invasive species across the oceans [11,12] and by interfering with chemical communication [13].
The plastic production reached 368 million tons in the world in 2019 [14]. The large diversity of properties of plastic, e.g., resistance, flexibility, durability and ease of processing, coupled with a relatively low production cost, makes it an essential product for many applications but also a persistent pollutant when discarded into the environment [15]. Its resistance to complete degradation depends on several factors including solar radiation, heat, oxygen supply and mechanical perturbation [16]. Indeed, fragmentation of plastics stranded on the continent and beaches or floating at the sea surface is faster than fragmentation of immersed plastics [16]. Degradation processes yield small plastic particles (<5 mm), commonly named microplastics (MPs), which are more numerous than larger pieces. MPs may also come from manufactured micro-size plastics (e.g., from cosmetics [17]).
Once in the oceans, MPs can be ingested through feeding or respiration by organisms of all size classes and be transported through the water column [18,19]. If egested with faeces, microplastics can significantly alter the sinking rates of faecal pellets and thus lower the efficiency of the biological pump [20]. In addition, several studies have demonstrated experimentally the transfer of MPs to higher trophic levels in the food web (e.g., mussel to crab [21] or copepods to jellyfish [22]). In addition, their large surface areas increase their capacity to adsorb pollutants or to carry invasive or pathogen species [11,12]. MPs are included among the descriptors of the Good Environmental Status defined by the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive [23], which requires Member States to monitor them within four marine compartments: coastlines, sea surfaces, marine sediments, and biota.
The Mediterranean Sea, although it only represents 0.7% of the world’s ocean area, [24] hosts 28% of endemic species, 7.5% of the world’s marine fauna and 18% of the world’s marine flora. The area is highly exposed to marine litter pollution [25,26,27,28,29] because of its semi-enclosed basin coupled with a highly anthropized coastline. Mediterranean shores host high population densities, receive waters from densely populated river catchments and is one of the most popular tourist destination in the world [30]. At least 134 species have been identified as being impacted by marine litter in the Mediterranean Sea [27]. MPs have consequently been observed in various species in the Mediterranean Sea [28] but only three species were studied in the Gulf of Lion (Clupea harengus, Sardina pilchardus, and Engraulis encrasicolus) [31,32,33,34,35]. Thus, the aim of this study was to improve our knowledge on MP impacted fishes in the Gulf of Lion, one of the most productive Mediterranean areas. We examined the presence of MPs within 18 local and coastal fish species and assessed their concentrations and their qualitative properties such as their shapes and polymer composition. We further analyzed these data in the search for patterns between the level of MP contamination and traits of the life of the different species (i.e., food and habitat preferences).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Gulf of Lion is a river-dominated continental margin covering 11,000 km2 from Cap Croisette in the northeast to Cap Creus in the southwest (Figure 1). This northwestern Mediterranean region is characterized by dense coastal populations and large supplies of freshwater, sediments, nutrients and contaminants [36,37,38]. The Rhône River (discharging to the Gulf of Lion) currently represents the highest freshwater input into the Mediterranean Sea. Inputs of particulate matter to the gulf originate mainly from the Rhône River (on average 95% of the total inputs) but other small coastal rivers (Hérault, Orb, Aude, Agly, Têt and Tech) can also carry large amounts of freshwater, sediments and contaminants during intense flash floods [39]. The sea floor along the coast is dominated by a sandy shore habitat and the rocky habitats are only found in the southernmost part of the Gulf of Lion [40]. The strong Northern Current runs along the continental slope of the Gulf of Lion from northeast to southeast.

2.2. Sample Collection

Digestive tract were opportunistically obtained from another research team of the university of Perpignan (see acknowledgment), already gathered by species in plastic beakers. Fishes were collected by divers along the rocky coast or bought at local fish markets (already dead, no killing was performed during this study). All species have been fished or captured within the study area at the southern part of the Gulf (Figure 1). They were preserved in a cooling container and transported to the laboratory, where they were identified at the species level, weighed and measured. Then, the entire digestive tracts (from esophagus to the end of the intestine) were dissected, measured and gathered by species in individual clean plastic beakers. Beakers were frozen at −20 °C until the extraction of MPs.

2.3. Extraction of MPs from Fish Tissues

Contamination of samples was minimized by wearing laboratory cotton coats and by using glass or steel equipment and tools, rinsed with MilliQ® water (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and wrapped in aluminum foils. Several contamination control filters were simultaneously performed as blanks with MilliQ® water following the same procedures, as the digestive tracts, described hereafter. Digestive tracts were transferred to glass beakers and tissues were removed using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; modified from Avio et al. [41]). A total of 2 mL of H2O2 (40%) was added repeatedly until most of the tissues was digested. During the entire digestive process, beakers were heated at 50 °C on a heating plate. The resulting solutions were filtered on LLG® filter papers (diameter: 47 mm; porosity: 2 µm; Lab Logistics Group GmbH, Meckenheim, Germany). Filters were dried at 50 °C overnight and then examined under a Wild Heerbrugg (Leica®, Wetzlar, Germany) dissecting stereomicroscope (6×, 12×, 25× and 50× magnification). The smallest size of MPs that can be accurately sorted with this microscope has been estimated to 100 µm, which means that a MP size range of 100 µm to 5 mm could be investigated in our study. Particles were separated into only two shape categories: fibers (including filaments and fishing line) and fragments (items with a three-dimensional shape). No other shapes, such as solid spheres (beads), two-dimensional items (films) or pieces with a spongy or soft structure (foams) were found.

2.4. Polymer Analysis with Fourier Transform InfraRed Spectroscopy

A total of 31 fibers and 4 fragments found in fish guts were randomly selected and analyzed with a Spectra-Tech IR-PLAN® microscope (Spectra Tech Inc., Oak Ridge, TN, USA) coupled to a Bomem ABB® FTLA FTIR spectrometer (ABB, Zurich, Switzerland) in order to verify their plastic nature and to determine their polymeric composition [42]. The identification of each polymer was performed by comparison with a self-collected spectrum database including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyamide (PA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate) (PEVA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyester (PES), polyurethane (PUT), acrylic (A) and some non-plastic materials such as cotton, wool, wood, paper, calcium carbonate, talcum powder and plant fibers. Only polymers reaching at least 70% of similarity with reference spectra were accepted, according to the suggestion of Thompson et al. [43].

2.5. Data Analysis

The highest number of suspected plastics found in blank laboratory control filters (10 fibers) was subtracted to the initial sorting to correct overestimation due to laboratory contaminants. In addition, FTIR analysis was used to remove the false-positive particles, i.e., non-plastic particles incorrectly sorted as “suspected plastic items” in our samples. An identified plastic ratio was calculated by dividing the number of particles with a real “plastic spectra” by the total number of suspected plastics. All MP results (contents and relative contents of shapes given in the following text, figures and tables) correspond to identified and spectrometrically verified MPs. Finally, mean concentrations of MPs (items fish−1) were estimated by dividing the corrected numbers of MP items by the number of individuals for each species. As digestive tracts of fishes were pooled at the species level before extraction, concentrations per individual could not be estimated, and therefore, no standard deviation could be calculated, and no further statistical analysis could be performed.

3. Results

A total of 386 particles have been suspected to be MPs, consecutively sorted from the 107 fishes belonging to 18 species of the Mediterranean Sea (Table 1 and Figure 2A). After blank control and FTIR correction, it appears that only 85 items or 22% (identified plastic ratio) of the suspected MPs were really ingested MPs (Figure 2B and Figure 3). The mean concentration of MPs was 0.80 items fish−1 if we consider the total number of fishes, 1.00 items fish−1 if the species without ingested MPs are removed and 0.31 items fish−1 if we consider only the 5 taxa with 10 individuals and more (Table 1).
Mean concentrations of corrected MPs range from 0.00 to 5.15 items fish−1 within the 18 species (Table 1 and Figure 2B). Only 4 species (22 fishes) have no MP in their digestive tracts: D. sargus, P. erythrinus, S. roissali and U. scaber. 7 taxa (61 fishes) had MP concentrations lower than 1.5 MPs per fish and the remaining 3 species (12 fishes) had MP concentrations higher than 3 MPs per fish: D. cervinus, D. puntazzo, S. umbra.
Only fiber and fragment shapes were observed inside digestive tracks (Figure 3). FTIR results indicate that among the 31 randomly selected fibers only 11 were made of plastic (35%). All tested fragments (n = 4) were made of PE. After FTIR and blank control corrections, MP fibers were still remain largely dominant (91%) compared to fragments (9%). About half of the 11 certified plastic fibers were made of PES (n = 5; 45%), slightly less were PA (n = 4; 36%), and only one fiber was made of A (n = 1; 9%) or PP (n = 1; 9%).
The three species with high MP mean concentrations (>3 items fish−1; Diplodus cervinus, Diplodus puntazzo, Scieana umbra) have different prey preferences than the others species and feed on small nektonic organisms or crustaceans and fishes (Figure 4B and Table 1). They also belong to the longest fishes (mean size) with the longest digestive tracts (mean length; Table 1 and Figure 2B). No undeniable differences in mean MP concentrations according to the fish position across the water column (Figure 4A) and prey preferences (Figure 4B) were noticed. No co-variation was observed between the trophic level and MP concentrations (Figure 4C).

4. Discussion

4.1. Mediterranean Fish Species Impacted by MPs

Our study exhibited MP concentrations per fish that are close to the laboratory contamination. This result shows that a strict blank control procedure is required despite all the rigorous contamination control procedures. Additionally, the authentication procedure with an FTIR spectrometer is required, as 78% of the suspected MPs particles initially sorted were removed after both the blank control and the FTIR correction.
Blank corrected and FTIR verified MP concentrations of our 18 species of coastal fishes from the NW Mediterranean Sea varied within the same range (<5.2 items fish−1) than MP concentrations measured within previous studies (0.3–2.0 items fish−1; Table 2). In other locations of the Mediterranean Sea, Pellini et al. [48] and Anastasopoulou et al. [49] measured the highest concentration means in Adriatic fishes (8.6 items fish−1 for S. solea and 9.5 items fish−1 for C. auratus). These values are about twice as great than the highest mean MP concentration observed for D. puntazzo in our study (5.2 items fish−1). The Adriatic Sea focused several investigations on contamination of fishes with MPs and seems to exhibit the highest contents of MPs in Mediterranean fishes. This semi-enclosed basin with an almost closed oceanic circulation at the Strait of Otranto is bordered by 3.700 km of shores which attract many tourists and which collect one third of the continental freshwater that flows into the Mediterranean Sea. The Adriatic Sea is among the zones with the highest floating MP concentrations recorded in the Mediterranean Sea [50].
Unlike results from Mediterranean beaches [51], where high MP concentrations are coupled with high percentages of fibers, percentages of fibers inside fishes vary from low to high independently of total MP concentrations, i.e., some fishes with high concentrations had low percentages of fibers and others with low concentrations had high percentages of fibers. Among the 107 fishes of 18 species, fibers accounted, on average, for 91% of all MP items. In other literature studies, they represent in a few cases less than 50% [4,31,48], and are dominant in the majority of them [52,53,54,55], and sometimes even reached up to 97 and 100% [56,57]. Fibers are definitely complex to accurately enumerate.
Synthetic fibers are among the most abundant MP shapes in oceans and beaches, and can originate from textile [58] but also from fishing nets [59]. Most of the ecotoxicological studies on MP impact on marine organisms used manufactured small microbeads and little is known about the consequence of other MP shapes as fibers on marine animals [60]. Fossi et al. [28] reported from the scientific literature and for the whole Mediterranean Sea 60 fish species contaminated by plastic debris whatever their sizes. This study added 14 new species to the 7 other coastal fish species previously investigated in the NW Mediterranean, that reach now the total number of 27 (Table 2).

4.2. Impacted Fish Species: Relation with Their Food Supply and Their Habitat

In this study, the high heterogeneity between the number of individuals per species as well as the lack of data per fish (fishes have been polled by species) does not allow to statistically test the differences between habitats and prey preferences. However, results (Table 1, Figure 3) suggest that fishes with large digestive tracks and fed by larger preys record the highest MP concentrations. Several previous studies [54,69,70] investigated the MP concentrations in fishes from different trophic levels without detecting relationships between MP concentration inside fishes and trophic levels. Welden et al. [70] observed a transfer of MPs between a prey (A. tobianus) and its fish predator (P. platessa), but mean concentrations were similar between both species and the authors suggested that MPs are not significantly retained within the digestive tract of predators. Lusher et al. [6] came to the same conclusions after having found MPs throughout the whole digestive tract of fishes. Retention within the digestive tracts may be influenced by the length, the morphology and the straightness of these tracks. This may explain that the most impacted fishes in our study have the longest digestive tracts. Within the same trophic level, behavior of fishes in terms of feeding strategy or migration may also influence MP ingestion [71,72]. Romeo et al. [71] found no differences in MP concentration within bluefin tuna T. thynnus (opportunistic feeder) and albacore tuna T. alalunga (specialist feeder). Romeo et al. [72] observed within the same family, more MPs within species characterized by a migration behavior than without. At the species scale, MP ingestion may depend on fish size, weight, physical condition or stomach contents [48,52,54,55]. Alomar and Deudero [52] observed that fuller stomachs contained more MPs. Güven et al. [54] found no relation between fish length or fish mass and MP ingestion (all species were polled), whereas Pellini et al. [48] observed that in soles, small MPs (<100 µm) were less abundant in larger fishes than in smaller fishes. Compa et al. [55] came to the same conclusions for S. pilchardus. As concluded by Fossi et al. [28], further studies are now needed at different scales and with sentinel species, to better understand the interactions between marine organisms and MP accumulation.
The habitats of our investigated fish species could also play a significant role in the contamination of MPs, but the relationships were less evident than in the case of the preferred preys. Indeed, the demersal species were slightly more contaminated than pelagic ones. At a larger spatial scale, fish habitats in the Mediterranean Sea and other oceans have been often proposed as an important forcing factor for MP accumulation [48,53,56,70]. With respect to potential sources of MP pollution in the sea, Alomar et al. [57] found no relation between MPs inside fishes and the sampling distance from the coast and the main sources of MPs as through rivers, harbors and coastal cities.

5. Conclusions

This study was carried out on the ingestion of MPs by 18 Mediterranean fish species, about which 14 were investigated for the first time. We confirm the widespread presence of MPs in Mediterranean fishes and are able to draw several major conclusions.
  • The quantification of MPs in fishes requires high methodological concerns and analytical confirmation. A total of 78% of the suspected plastic particles in our samples were actually not MPs;
  • We found that 4 species (D. sargus, P. erythrinus, S. roissali and U. scaber) were not contaminated by MPs and 3 species (D. cervinus, D. puntazzo, S. umbra) were found to have higher than average MP concentrations (>3 MPs per fish). However, the number of investigated fishes per species was low and further investigations are needed to confirm this;
  • About 80% of our contaminated species did not exceed the concentration of 2 MPs per fish. A low MP ingestion rate and a rapid egestion through simple digestive tracks can explain this low accumulation;
  • Fiber is the main MP shape (91%) found in fish digestive tracts. Their impact on marine life are nearly unknown;
  • The length and the morphology of fish digestive tracts, the prey preferences and, with lesser evidence, the habitat may influence the concentration of MPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C., M.R. and P.K.; methodology, M.C. and P.K.; validation, M.C.; formal analysis, M.C., M.R, P.K., L.W. and W.L.; investigation, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.; writing—review and editing, M.C., M.R, P.K., L.W. and W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data is contained within this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Anthony Caro and Joaquim Claudet (CRIOBE) for giving us intestinal tracts of all the fish species. We thank Nùria Ferrer from the “Centres Cientifics i Tecnologics” of the University of Barcelona for her technical support during FTIR analyses. This study was performed within the PhD of Mel Constant funded by the “Ecole Doctorale ED305” of the University of Perpignan Via Domitia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Galgani, F.; Hanke, G.; Maes, T. Global Distribution, Composition and Abundance of Marine Litter. In Marine Anthropogenic Litter; Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 29–56. ISBN 978-3-319-16509-7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kenyon, K.W.; Kridler, E. Laysan Albatrosses Swallow Indigestible Matter. The Auk 1969, 86, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Desforges, J.-P.W.; Galbraith, M.; Ross, P.S. Ingestion of Microplastics by Zooplankton in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 69, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Digka, N.; Tsangaris, C.; Torre, M.; Anastasopoulou, A.; Zeri, C. Microplastics in Mussels and Fish from the Northern Ionian Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 135, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fowler, C.W. Marine Debris and Northern Fur Seals: A Case Study. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1987, 18, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lusher, A.L.; Hernandez-Milian, G.; O’Brien, J.; Berrow, S.; O’Connor, I.; Officer, R. Microplastic and Macroplastic Ingestion by a Deep Diving, Oceanic Cetacean: The True’s Beaked Whale Mesoplodon Mirus. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 199, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ryan, P.G. A Brief History of Marine Litter Research. In Marine Anthropogenic Litter; Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 1–25. ISBN 978-3-319-16509-7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ryan, P.G.; Connell, A.D.; Gardner, B.D. Plastic Ingestion and PCBs in Seabirds: Is There a Relationship? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1988, 19, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Derraik, J.G.B. The Pollution of the Marine Environment by Plastic Debris: A Review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 44, 842–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shaughnessy, P.D. Entanglement of Cape Fur Seals with Man-Made Objects. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1980, 11, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reisser, J.; Shaw, J.; Hallegraeff, G.; Proietti, M.; Barnes, D.K.A.; Thums, M.; Wilcox, C.; Hardesty, B.D.; Pattiaratchi, C. Millimeter-Sized Marine Plastics: A New Pelagic Habitat for Microorganisms and Invertebrates. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rochman, C.M. The Complex Mixture, Fate and Toxicity of Chemicals Associated with Plastic Debris in the Marine Environment. In Marine Anthropogenic Litter; Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 117–140. ISBN 978-3-319-16510-3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Trotter, B.; Ramsperger, A.F.R.M.; Raab, P.; Haberstroh, J.; Laforsch, C. Plastic Waste Interferes with Chemical Communication in Aquatic Ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Plastics Europe. Plastics-The Facts 2020—An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data. Plast. Eur. 2020, 1, 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  15. GESAMP; IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection. Sources, Fate and Effects of Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Global Assessment; International Maritime Organization: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. Andrady, A.L. Persistence of Plastic Litter in the Oceans. In Marine Anthropogenic Litter; Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 57–72. ISBN 978-3-319-16509-7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Napper, I.E.; Bakir, A.; Rowland, S.J.; Thompson, R.C. Characterisation, Quantity and Sorptive Properties of Microplastics Extracted from Cosmetics. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 99, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Albano, M.; Panarello, G.; Di Paola, D.; Capparucci, F.; Crupi, R.; Gugliandolo, E.; Spanò, N.; Capillo, G.; Savoca, S. The Influence of Polystyrene Microspheres Abundance on Development and Feeding Behavior of Artemia Salina (Linnaeus, 1758). Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Albano, M.; Panarello, G.; Di Paola, D.; D’Angelo, G.; Granata, A.; Savoca, S.; Capillo, G. The Mauve Stinger Pelagia Noctiluca (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) Plastics Contamination, the Strait of Messina Case. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2021, 78, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wieczorek, A.M.; Croot, P.L.; Lombard, F.; Sheahan, J.N.; Doyle, T.K. Microplastic Ingestion by Gelatinous Zooplankton May Lower Efficiency of the Biological Pump. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5387–5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Farrell, P.; Nelson, K. Trophic Level Transfer of Microplastic: Mytilus Edulis (L.) to Carcinus Maenas (L.). Environ. Pollut. 2013, 177, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Costa, E.; Piazza, V.; Lavorano, S.; Faimali, M.; Garaventa, F.; Gambardella, C. Trophic Transfer of Microplastics From Copepods to Jellyfish in the Marine Environment. Front. Environ. Sci. 2020, 8, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Galgani, F.; Fleet, D.; Van Franeker, J.; Katsanevakis, S.; Maes, T.; Mouat, J.; Oosterbaan, L.; Poitou, I.; Hanke, G.; Thompson, R.; et al. Marine Strategy Framework Directive Task Group 10 Report: Marine Litter, April 2010; Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bianchi, C.N.; Morri, C. Marine Biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: Situation, Problems and Prospects for Future Research. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2000, 40, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cózar, A.; Sanz-Martín, M.; Martí, E.; González-Gordillo, J.I.; Ubeda, B.; Gálvez, J.Á.; Irigoien, X.; Duarte, C.M. Plastic Accumulation in the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121762. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tubau, X.; Canals, M.; Lastras, G.; Rayo, X.; Rivera, J.; Amblas, D. Marine Litter on the Floor of Deep Submarine Canyons of the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea: The Role of Hydrodynamic Processes. Prog. Oceanogr. 2015, 134, 379–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Deudero, S.; Alomar, C. Mediterranean Marine Biodiversity under Threat: Reviewing Influence of Marine Litter on Species. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 98, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fossi, M.C.; Pedà, C.; Compa, M.; Tsangaris, C.; Alomar, C.; Claro, F.; Ioakeimidis, C.; Galgani, F.; Hema, T.; Deudero, S.; et al. Bioindicators for Monitoring Marine Litter Ingestion and Its Impacts on Mediterranean Biodiversity. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 237, 1023–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Galgani, F.; Souplet, A.; Cadiou, Y. Accumulation of Debris on the Deep Sea Floor off the French Mediterranean Coast. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1996, 142, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Durrieu de Madron, X.; Guieu, C.; Sempéré, R.; Conan, P.; Cossa, D.; D’Ortenzio, F.; Estournel, C.; Gazeau, F.; Rabouille, C.; Stemmann, L.; et al. Marine Ecosystems’ Responses to Climatic and Anthropogenic Forcings in the Mediterranean. Prog. Oceanogr. 2011, 91, 97–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Collard, F.; Gilbert, B.; Compère, P.; Eppe, G.; Das, K.; Jauniaux, T.; Parmentier, E. Microplastics in Livers of European Anchovies (Engraulis Encrasicolus, L.). Environ. Pollut. 2017, 229, 1000–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Collard, F.; Gilbert, B.; Eppe, G.; Parmentier, E.; Das, K. Detection of Anthropogenic Particles in Fish Stomachs: An Isolation Method Adapted to Identification by Raman Spectroscopy. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 69, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Collard, F.; Gilbert, B.; Eppe, G.; Roos, L.; Compère, P.; Das, K.; Parmentier, E. Morphology of the Filtration Apparatus of Three Planktivorous Fishes and Relation with Ingested Anthropogenic Particles. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 116, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lefebvre, C.; Saraux, C.; Heitz, O.; Nowaczyk, A.; Bonnet, D. Microplastics FTIR Characterisation and Distribution in the Water Column and Digestive Tracts of Small Pelagic Fish in the Gulf of Lions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 142, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pennino, M.G.; Bachiller, E.; Lloret-Lloret, E.; Albo-Puigserver, M.; Esteban, A.; Jadaud, A.; Bellido, J.M.; Coll, M. Ingestion of Microplastics and Occurrence of Parasite Association in Mediterranean Anchovy and Sardine. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 158, 111399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Durrieu de Madron, X.; Abassi, A.; Heussner, S.; Monaco, A.; Aloisi, J.C.; Radakovitch, O.; Giresse, P.; Buscail, R.; Kerherve, P. Particulate Matter and Organic Carbon Budgets for the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Oceanol. Acta 2000, 23, 717–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ludwig, W.; Dumont, E.; Meybeck, M.; Heussner, S. River Discharges of Water and Nutrients to the Mediterranean and Black Sea: Major Drivers for Ecosystem Changes during Past and Future Decades? Prog. Oceanogr. 2009, 80, 199–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bouloubassi, I.; Roussiez, V.; Azzoug, M.; Lorre, A. Sources, Dispersal Pathways and Mass Budget of Sedimentary Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in the NW Mediterranean Margin, Gulf of Lions. Mar. Chem. 2012, 142–144, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sadaoui, M.; Ludwig, W.; Bourrin, F.; Raimbault, P. Controls, Budgets and Variability of Riverine Sediment Fluxes to the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean Sea). J. Hydrol. 2016, 540, 1002–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Courp, T.; Monaco, A. Sediment Dispersal and Accumulation on the Continental Margin of the Gulf of Lions: Sedimentary Budget. Cont. Shelf Res. 1990, 10, 1063–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Avio, C.G.; Gorbi, S.; Regoli, F. Experimental Development of a New Protocol for Extraction and Characterization of Microplastics in Fish Tissues: First Observations in Commercial Species from Adriatic Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2015, 111, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Löder, M.G.J.; Gerdts, G. Methodology Used for the Detection and Identification of Microplastics—A Critical Appraisal. In Marine Anthropogenic Litter; Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 201–227. ISBN 978-3-319-16509-7. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thompson, R.C.; Olsen, Y.; Mitchell, R.P.; Davis, A.; Rowland, S.J.; John, A.W.G.; McGonigle, D.; Russell, A.E. Lost at Sea: Where Is All the Plastic? Science 2004, 304, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Louisy, P. Guide D’identification Des Poissons Marins: Europe De l’ouest et Méditerranée; Editions Eugen Ulmer: Paris, France, 2002; ISBN 2-84138-651-1. [Google Scholar]
  45. Harmelin, J.-G.; Ruitton, S. Poissons de Méditerranée; Edisud: Biganos, France, 2013; ISBN 978-2-7449-0992-4. [Google Scholar]
  46. Weinberg, S. Découvrir La Vie Sous-Marine Méditerranée; Guardian Angel Publishing: Saint Louis, MO, USA, 2013; ISBN 2-7417-0533-X. [Google Scholar]
  47. Froese, R.; Pauly, D. FishBase. Available online: www.fishbase.org (accessed on 13 November 2021).
  48. Pellini, G.; Gomiero, A.; Fortibuoni, T.; Ferrà, C.; Grati, F.; Tassetti, A.N.; Polidori, P.; Fabi, G.; Scarcella, G. Characterization of Microplastic Litter in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Solea Solea from the Adriatic Sea. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Anastasopoulou, A.; Kovač Viršek, M.; Bojanić Varezić, D.; Digka, N.; Fortibuoni, T.; Koren, Š.; Mandić, M.; Mytilineou, C.; Pešić, A.; Ronchi, F.; et al. Assessment on Marine Litter Ingested by Fish in the Adriatic and NE Ionian Sea Macro-Region (Mediterranean). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 133, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gajšt, T.; Bizjak, T.; Palatinus, A.; Liubartseva, S.; Kržan, A. Sea Surface Microplastics in Slovenian Part of the Northern Adriatic. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 113, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Constant, M.; Kerhervé, P.; Mino-Vercellio-Verollet, M.; Dumontier, M.; Sànchez Vidal, A.; Canals, M.; Heussner, S. Beached Microplastics in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 142, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Alomar, C.; Deudero, S. Evidence of Microplastic Ingestion in the Shark Galeus Melastomus Rafinesque, 1810 in the Continental Shelf off the Western Mediterranean Sea. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 223, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bellas, J.; Martínez-Armental, J.; Martínez-Cámara, A.; Besada, V.; Martínez-Gómez, C. Ingestion of Microplastics by Demersal Fish from the Spanish Atlantic and Mediterranean Coasts. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 109, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Güven, O.; Gökdağ, K.; Jovanović, B.; Kıdeyş, A.E. Microplastic Litter Composition of the Turkish Territorial Waters of the Mediterranean Sea, and Its Occurrence in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Fish. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 223, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Compa, M.; Ventero, A.; Iglesias, M.; Deudero, S. Ingestion of Microplastics and Natural Fibres in Sardina Pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792) and Engraulis Encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) along the Spanish Mediterranean Coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 128, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Nadal, M.A.; Alomar, C.; Deudero, S. High Levels of Microplastic Ingestion by the Semipelagic Fish Bogue Boops Boops (L.) around the Balearic Islands. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 214, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Alomar, C.; Sureda, A.; Capó, X.; Guijarro, B.; Tejada, S.; Deudero, S. Microplastic Ingestion by Mullus Surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 Fish and Its Potential for Causing Oxidative Stress. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Napper, I.E.; Thompson, R.C. Release of Synthetic Microplastic Plastic Fibres from Domestic Washing Machines: Effects of Fabric Type and Washing Conditions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 112, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Consoli, P.; Andaloro, F.; Altobelli, C.; Battaglia, P.; Campagnuolo, S.; Canese, S.; Castriota, L.; Cillari, T.; Falautano, M.; Pedà, C.; et al. Marine Litter in an EBSA (Ecologically or Biologically Significant Area) of the Central Mediterranean Sea: Abundance, Composition, Impact on Benthic Species and Basis for Monitoring Entanglement. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cole, M. A Novel Method for Preparing Microplastic Fibers. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Garcia-Garin, O.; Vighi, M.; Aguilar, A.; Tsangaris, C.; Digka, N.; Kaberi, H.; Borrell, A. Boops Boops as a Bioindicator of Microplastic Pollution along the Spanish Catalan Coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 149, 110648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rios-Fuster, B.; Alomar, C.; Compa, M.; Guijarro, B.; Deudero, S. Anthropogenic Particles Ingestion in Fish Species from Two Areas of the Western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 144, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sbrana, A.; Valente, T.; Scacco, U.; Bianchi, J.; Silvestri, C.; Palazzo, L.; De Lucia, G.A.; Valerani, C.; Ardizzone, G.; Matiddi, M. Spatial Variability and Influence of Biological Parameters on Microplastic Ingestion by Boops Boops (L.) along the Italian Coasts (Western Mediterranean Sea). Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tsangaris, C.; Digka, N.; Valente, T.; Aguilar, A.; Borrell, A.; De Lucia, G.A.; Gambaiani, D.; Garcia-Garin, O.; Kaberi, H.; Martin, J.; et al. Using Boops Boops (Osteichthyes) to Assess Microplastic Ingestion in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 158, 111397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Giani, D.; Baini, M.; Galli, M.; Casini, S.; Fossi, M.C. Microplastics Occurrence in Edible Fish Species (Mullus Barbatus and Merluccius Merluccius) Collected in Three Different Geographical Sub-Areas of the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 140, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Capillo, G.; Savoca, S.; Panarello, G.; Mancuso, M.; Branca, C.; Romano, V.; D’Angelo, G.; Bottari, T.; Spanò, N. Quali-Quantitative Analysis of Plastics and Synthetic Microfibers Found in Demersal Species from Southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Central Mediterranean). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 150, 110596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Savoca, S.; Capillo, G.; Mancuso, M.; Bottari, T.; Crupi, R.; Branca, C.; Romano, V.; Faggio, C.; D’Angelo, G.; Spanò, N. Microplastics Occurrence in the Tyrrhenian Waters and in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Two Congener Species of Seabreams. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 67, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Avio, C.G.; Cardelli, L.R.; Gorbi, S.; Pellegrini, D.; Regoli, F. Microplastics Pollution after the Removal of the Costa Concordia Wreck: First Evidences from a Biomonitoring Case Study. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 227, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Foekema, E.M.; De Gruijter, C.; Mergia, M.T.; Van Franeker, J.A.; Murk, A.J.; Koelmans, A.A. Plastic in North Sea Fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 8818–8824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Welden, N.A.; Abylkhani, B.; Howarth, L.M. The Effects of Trophic Transfer and Environmental Factors on Microplastic Uptake by Plaice, Pleuronectes Plastessa, and Spider Crab, Maja Squinado. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 239, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Romeo, T.; Pietro, B.; Pedà, C.; Consoli, P.; Andaloro, F.; Fossi, M.C. First Evidence of Presence of Plastic Debris in Stomach of Large Pelagic Fish in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 95, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Romeo, T.; Peda, C.; Fossi, M.C.; Andaloro, F.; Battaglia, P. First Record of Plastic Debris in the Stomach of Mediterranean Lanternfishes. Acta Adriat. 2016, 57, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
Microplastics 01 00012 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of the study area. General map of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea showing the location of the Gulf of Lion (shaded area). Gulf of Lion with location of the sampling area (red empty square).
Figure 1. Location of the study area. General map of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea showing the location of the Gulf of Lion (shaded area). Gulf of Lion with location of the sampling area (red empty square).
Microplastics 01 00012 g001
Microplastics 01 00012 g002 550
Figure 2. Uncorrected and corrected numbers of items per fish (items fish−1) for the 18 fish studied species. (A) Numbers of suspected MPs per fish, i.e., before Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) and blank corrections. (B) Numbers of corrected MPs per fish. Red short line indicates the highest number of suspected MP found in all blank laboratory control filters (i.e., 10 items) divided by the number of fish examined per taxon. Colors indicate MP shapes, with light blue for fibers and dark blue for fragments. Numbers above bars indicate the number of fish examined per taxon. Taxa are ordered following the mean length of digestive tracts measured, with increasing length from left to right.
Figure 2. Uncorrected and corrected numbers of items per fish (items fish−1) for the 18 fish studied species. (A) Numbers of suspected MPs per fish, i.e., before Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) and blank corrections. (B) Numbers of corrected MPs per fish. Red short line indicates the highest number of suspected MP found in all blank laboratory control filters (i.e., 10 items) divided by the number of fish examined per taxon. Colors indicate MP shapes, with light blue for fibers and dark blue for fragments. Numbers above bars indicate the number of fish examined per taxon. Taxa are ordered following the mean length of digestive tracts measured, with increasing length from left to right.
Microplastics 01 00012 g002
Microplastics 01 00012 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative shape distribution and synthetic organic polymer composition of suspected MPs (circles 1 and 2) and verified MPs (circles 3 and 4) found in the 18 fish species. Circle 1 (center): shape of the suspected MPs before FTIR and blank control correction. Circle 2: results of the FTIR analysis on randomly selected suspected MPs. Circle 3: shape of MPs after FTIR and blank control correction. Circle 4 (exterior): polymer composition of MPs. Except for the number of suspected MPs (circle 1), “n” is an estimated number of MPs.
Figure 3. Relative shape distribution and synthetic organic polymer composition of suspected MPs (circles 1 and 2) and verified MPs (circles 3 and 4) found in the 18 fish species. Circle 1 (center): shape of the suspected MPs before FTIR and blank control correction. Circle 2: results of the FTIR analysis on randomly selected suspected MPs. Circle 3: shape of MPs after FTIR and blank control correction. Circle 4 (exterior): polymer composition of MPs. Except for the number of suspected MPs (circle 1), “n” is an estimated number of MPs.
Microplastics 01 00012 g003
Microplastics 01 00012 g004 550
Figure 4. Mean MP concentrations per fish (items fish−1). (A) Concentrations within five groups of species pooled according to their habitats. (B) Concentrations for four groups of species pooled according to their prey preferences. (C) Concentrations according to the trophic level [47] of each species. The bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.
Figure 4. Mean MP concentrations per fish (items fish−1). (A) Concentrations within five groups of species pooled according to their habitats. (B) Concentrations for four groups of species pooled according to their prey preferences. (C) Concentrations according to the trophic level [47] of each species. The bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.
Microplastics 01 00012 g004
Table
Table 1. Average numbers of microplastics (MPs) per fish (corrected values) and associated features of the different species. Size: Mean total length of fishes (cm). Information on habitats and foods are given in [44,45,46,47].
Table 1. Average numbers of microplastics (MPs) per fish (corrected values) and associated features of the different species. Size: Mean total length of fishes (cm). Information on habitats and foods are given in [44,45,46,47].
SpeciesNumber of FishSize (cm)Mean Digestive
Tract Length (mm)		HabitatType of PreysTrophic LevelMean MPs
Per Fish
Anthias anthias117113reef-associatedsmall nektonic3.8 ± 0.61.05
Boops boops1023493demersalsmall nektonic2.8 ± 0.00.52
Chromis chromis79140reef-associatedsmall nektonic3.8 ± 0.40.65
Coris julis123121reef-associatedsmall nektonic3.4 ± 0.11.05
Diplodus annularis1017203benthopelagicsmall nektonic3.6 ± 0.00.10
Diplodus cervinus343451benthopelagicsmall nektonic3.0 ± 0.43.85
Diplodus puntazzo135429benthopelagicsmall nektonic3.2 ± 0.05.15
Diplodus sargus225276demersalsmall nektonic3.4 ± 0.10.00
Mugil cephalus3751739benthopelagicplanktons2.5 ± 0.20.35
Pagellus erythrinus635197benthopelagicsmall nektonic3.5 ± 0.10.00
Sardina pilchardus1319145pelagic-neriticsmall invertebrates3.1 ± 0.10.48
Scieana umbra838351demersalsmall nektonic3.8 ± 0.53.52
Spicara maena1223179pelagic-neriticsmall invertebrates4.2 ± 0.60.46
Symphodus ocellatus8966reef-associatedsmall nektonic3.5 ± 0.01.09
Symphodus roissali131495reef-associatedsmall nektonic3.5 ± 0.40.00
Symphodus rostratus2971reef-associatedsmall nektonic3.5 ± 0.01.40
Symphodus tinca628228reef-associatedsmall nektonic3.3 ± 0.30.52
Uranoscopus scaber130175benthiccrustaceans and fishes4.4 ± 0.70.00
Table
Table 2. Synthesis of MP concentrations in coastal fishes of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. The number of fish is the sum of fishes investigated in each study. The percentage of fish with MPs and MP concentrations (fish without MPs are included) are weighted average by the number of fish per study. ND: no data. * MP concentrations within fish with MPs (i.e., fish without MPs are excluded). Decimal values are rounded to the nearest integer.
Table 2. Synthesis of MP concentrations in coastal fishes of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. The number of fish is the sum of fishes investigated in each study. The percentage of fish with MPs and MP concentrations (fish without MPs are included) are weighted average by the number of fish per study. ND: no data. * MP concentrations within fish with MPs (i.e., fish without MPs are excluded). Decimal values are rounded to the nearest integer.
SpeciesNumber of FishFish with MPsConcentrations (Items fish−1)References
Anthias anthias1 1.1This study
Boops Boops175050%0.8[56,61,62,63,64]
10 0.5This study
Chromis chromis7 0.7This study
Coris julis1 1.1This study
Diplodus annularis10 0.1This study
Diplodus cervinus3 3.85This study
Diplodus puntazzo1 5.2This study
Diplodus sargus2 0This study
Mugil cephalus3 0.35This study
Mullus barbatus28119%1.4[53,65,66]
Mullus surmuletus41727%0.4[57]
Pagellus bogaraveo2413%ND[67]
Pagellus erythrinus156%ND[67]
60%0This study
Raya miraletus1100%2.0[66]
Spondyliosoma cantharus3100%2.3 ± 1.1 *[54]
Sardina pilchardus22935%0.8[35,62,68]
13 0.5This study
Scieana umbra8 3.5This study
Scorpaena sp.863%3.2 ± 3.3 *[54]
Spicara maena12 0.5This study
Spondyliosoma cantharus3100%2.3 ±1.1 *[54]
Symphodus ocellatus8 1.1This study
Symphodus roissali13 0This study
Symphodus rostratus2 1.4This study
Symphodus tinca6 0.5This study
Trigla lyra1619%0.3[66]
Uranoscopus scaber683%2.4 ± 1.7 *[54]
1 0This study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Constant, M.; Reynaud, M.; Weiss, L.; Ludwig, W.; Kerhervé, P. Ingested Microplastics in 18 Local Fish Species from the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Microplastics 2022, 1, 186-197. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics1010012

AMA Style

Constant M, Reynaud M, Weiss L, Ludwig W, Kerhervé P. Ingested Microplastics in 18 Local Fish Species from the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Microplastics. 2022; 1(1):186-197. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics1010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Constant, Mel, Mathieu Reynaud, Lisa Weiss, Wolfgang Ludwig, and Philippe Kerhervé. 2022. "Ingested Microplastics in 18 Local Fish Species from the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea" Microplastics 1, no. 1: 186-197. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics1010012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop