Next Article in Journal
Phycoremediation of Copper by Chlorella protothecoides (UTEX 256): Proteomics of Protein Biosynthesis and Stress Response
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomass-Derived Advanced Carbon-Based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Innovative Processing Methods on Microalgae Cell Wall: Prospects towards Digestibility of Protein-Rich Biomass
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomass
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/biomass2020007
biomass-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress in Green Conversion of Biomass Alcohol to Chemicals via Aerobic Oxidation

by
Yifei Zhang
1,2,
Changhai Cao
3,* and
Gao Li
2,*
1
Institute of Catalysis for Energy and Environment, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
3
Key Laboratory of Biofuels and Biochemical Engineering, SINOPEC Dalian Research Institute of Petroleum and Petro-Chemicals, Dalian 116045, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomass 2022, 2(2), 103-115; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2020007
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Revised: 6 May 2022 / Accepted: 13 May 2022 / Published: 16 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Conversion and Processing Technologies of Carbon-Based Materials for Environmental and Energy Application Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aerobic oxidation of biomass transformations into valuable chemical products via a green catalytic process is one of the most important protocols because of its low reaction temperature and high productivity rate. Recently, the introduction of small-sized Cu and Au nanoparticles (e.g., 1–3 nm) upon the surface of oxides can provide more catalytic active sites and then enhance the catalytic activity of aerobic oxidations significantly. The introduction of these metal nanoparticles is a kind of perfect catalyst for enhancing the efficiency of the activation of oxygen molecules and the separation of photo-generated holes and electrons during the photo-oxidation reactions. In this account, we summarize recent progress of the aerobic oxidation of biomass alcohol toward the production of highly valuable chemicals over supported catalysts of metal nanoparticles (NPs), including methanol conversion into methyl formate via photo-oxidation over CuOx/TiO2 nanocomposites, biomass ethanol transformation with biomass furfural to produce hydrocarbons biofuels over Au/NiO catalysts, and glucose oxidation to gluconic acid using Au/activated carbon (Au/AC) as catalysts. Furthermore, at the atomic level, to understand the structure-property correlations, insights into molecular activations of oxygen and biomass, and the investigation of active catalytic sites on photo/catalysts will be detailed and discussed. Finally, future studies are needed to achieve more exciting progress in the fundamental revealing of the catalytic reaction mechanisms and conversion pathway and the future perspective in industrial applications.

1. Introduction

With the increase in the energy demands for future societies, biomass methanol and ethanol as sustainable energy attract enormous attention as a secure method for solving energy demands [1,2]. Methyl formate (HCOOCH3) produced from methanol and hydrocarbons from biomass ethanol with biomass furfural has been considered an environmentally benign valuable chemical product with the novel area called “green chemistry”, which has been used as an important precursor to produce pharmaceuticals and pesticides and as an additive to petroleum in the chemical industry [3,4,5].
Traditionally, methyl formate was industrially produced via carbonylation and dehydrogenation processes with methanol as raw material at high elevated temperatures (>100 °C), which is usually with low selectivity as the generation of many different by-products, e.g., formaldehyde (HCHO), dimethoxymethane, dimethyl ether (DME), carbon oxides (CO and CO2), etc., thereby posing a major issue for further separation and extra expenses [6,7,8]. Thus, the green photo-oxidation of methanol at ambient temperature showed great advantages and considerable prospects for the large-scale synthesis of methyl formate due to the green and energy saving nature of the pathway with a few CO2 formations (e.g., <5%) [9]. Of note, the CO2 formation is more than 10% at a higher reaction temperature in the thermal conversions of methanol.
As a kind of liquid fuel, hydrocarbons are the outmost important source of motive power energy in the field of the transportation sector, being produced on an industrial scale from nonrenewable fossil-based resources now. With the depletion of oil, the manufacture of sustainable biofuels from biomass has attracted particular interest. Bioethanol is a kind of important biomass that is renewable and a green chemical and commonly known as “cellulosic ethanol”, which can be produced from various plant materials [10] and react with an aldehyde via aldol condensation that is an effective protocol for C−C bond formation to produce biofuels [11,12,13,14]. Therefore, these conversion pathways by the ethanol oxidation condensation may provide an important breakthrough for diversification and sustainable development of hydrocarbon biofuels production [15,16,17].
With the aim of minimizing the consumption of fossil fuels and reducing CO2 emission, the transformation of renewable biomass-derived natural resources into corresponding high valuable biofuels and bio-chemicals is also another appealing and sustainable protocol [18,19,20,21,22]. For instance, the catalytic selective aerobic oxidation of glucose into gluconic acid or salts is one of the most important green chemical reactions [23]; it is an important commercial chemical that could be widely applied in many fields, such as food additives, raw material for the medicine, polymer manufacture, a few to name. At present, the industrial production of gluconic acid and its salts depends on microbial production or the aerobic oxidation process of glucose catalyzed by the Pd-based catalysts with loading Bi or Pb [24,25]. The Bi and Pb additives would contaminate the gluconic acid products (e.g., the residual Bi and Pb cations from the catalysts) [25], and it results in further purifications and the generation of waste.
Herein, we introduce recent progress in the green transformations of biomass to valuable chemicals, including the photo-oxidation of methanol toward the production of methyl formate over CuOx/TiO2 catalysts in the gas phase and the production of glucuronic acid from glucose via aerobic oxidation over Au/AC (AC: activated carbon) in a liquid phase and the hydrocarbon production from ethanol with furfural via a one-pot cascade reaction catalyzed by Au/NiO, viz., cross aldol condensations and then hydrogenolysis process. Moreover, the extrapolate catalytic mechanisms, and reaction pathways are thoroughly discussed based on systems developed mainly in our lab till April 2022.

2. Methanol Conversion to Methyl Formate

Methyl formate is one of the most important chemicals, which is widely used as synthesis intermediates, solvent for cellulose, and fumigants and fungicides in industrial productions [26,27]. Global consumption has largely increased by an average of ~9%/year from ~6.2 million tons in 2015 to 8.4 million tons in 2019, Figure 1.
2 CH3OH + O2 → HCOOCH3 + 2 H2O    ΔH = −102.5 kcal mol−1
As can be seen from Equation (1), the value of ΔH for methanol oxidation into methyl formate product is −102.5 kcal mol–1, so it is a strongly exothermic reaction, indicating that the photocatalytic methanol oxidation is feasible [28]. The gas phase photocatalytic methanol oxidation process was schematically illustrated in Figure 2 [29]. The bare anatase-TiO2 showed inferior photoactivity [30,31], although the apparent energy of activation is some low (~6.1 kJ mol−1), which is much lower than these over the transition metal oxides in the thermal oxidation (39–126 kJ mol−1). Thus, the extent of photocatalysis to the Cu/TiO2 system was developed [32]. As the work function of Cu (φCu = 4.60 eV [33]) is very close to that of TiO2 (φTiO2 = 4.70 eV), an Ohmic contact can be formed on the surface of TiO2 and Cu in the Cu/TiO2 complex nanomaterial.
The previous studies only focused on anatase-TiO2 or P25 (a mixture of anatase phase and rutile phase of TiO2) as support for metal nanoparticles (NPs), which cannot be used to go insight the interfacial perimeter of the oxide supports and metal NPs. Note that the interfacial perimeter of the oxide supports and metal NPs is often deemed as the catalytically active sites during the metal NPs-catalyzed reactions. In the past decades, the TiO2 with various shapes (such as nanorods (R), nanosheets (S), nanospindles (P), nanotube (T), etc.) has been successfully synthesized [34,35]. These well-defined TiO2s have specific exposing facets. For example, TiO2{001} and TiO2{101} surfaces are observed in the TiO2-S sample (Figure 3A), which has been widely used as photocatalysts [36,37], and very recently, CuOx/TiO2-S heterojunction was prepared via a reduction-deposition method as a well-defined and efficient photocatalyst and used for the photo-oxidation of methanol to methyl formate with oxygen (O2) gas as the oxidant [29]. The CuOx particles with small-sized (~3.5 nm, Figure 3A) were selectively supported on the TiO2{101} interface of anatase-TiO2-S, which can reduce the recombination of photo-generated electrons/holes dramatically under the situation of light irradiation. The CuO/TiO2-S heterojunction catalysts exhibited an excellent catalytic behavior under mild conditions for the catalytic photo-oxidation of methanol. The conversion is promoted by increasing reaction temperatures, and simultaneously the selectivity for methyl formate decreases.
Then, the concentration of the CuOx loading was further investigated. It could be found that CuOx/TiO2 photocatalyst with 5 wt% showed the best catalytic performance (~95% conversion and >85% selectivity for methyl formate), as shown in Figure 4. Interestingly, CO2 and formaldehyde by-products were observed in the reactions in the presence of 0.3% O2, and more CO2 was found when the O2 concentration improved to 0.75% and 1.0%, based on the conversion and selectivity in this photocatalytic reaction system, 0.5% O2 is the most suitable concentration. The reaction rate for methyl formate production at the optimal conditions can reach up to be 10.8 mmol⋅g−1⋅h−1 at ambient temperature, which is remarkably higher than only used bare CuOx oxides or TiO2-S. The robust CuOx/TiO2-S nanocomposites showed excellent durability for over 20 h. The unique electronic structure of oxide catalysts led to superior activity, and the synergistic effects of CuOx/TiO2 also improved the activity effectively.
Next, Shi et al. further deposited the CuOx nanoclusters onto the side TiO2{101} plane of the TiO2-P (Figure 3B) [38]. Note that there was not enough space on the top of TiO2-P to anchor the CuOx nanoclusters. Methanol-TPD experiments showed methanol could be chemisorbed on the surface of the CuO/TiO2 catalyst. It means the CuO/TiO2 should be an excellent candidate for the methanol oxidation reactions. An > 97% conversion and 83% selectivity were obtained over the CuO/TiO2–P under mild conditions. Interestingly, the surface oxygen vacancy (OV) species have a big influence on catalytic activity during the CuO/TiO2-P catalyzed reactions [39,40], Figure 4E. Thus, the small-sized CuO particles can optimally tune excitons recombination by OV generation and then promote its catalytic activity. Further, for the first time, in situ attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopic analysis reveals the adsorbed methoxy (CH3O*) was converted to adsorbed formaldehyde (CHO*) species in the presence of oxygen (Scheme 1, (3)) in the methanol conversion, Figure 5A,B. Then formed CHO* species further reacted with a neighboring CH3O* to provide methyl formate [38].
Further, Figure 5C figured out the proposed mechanism over CuO/TiO2 composites. The electrons are formed at TiO2’s valence band by the UV irradiation, which transfers to its conduction band, resulting in electrons and holes. The accumulated electrons would be transferred to the CuO surface via a p-n heterojunction, which largely improves the separation efficiency of photo-generated electrons and holes. The generated holes promote the HCHO* formation by CH3OH oxidation. In contrast, the dissociation of oxygen occurred over CuO particles with the aid of the generated electrons to refill TiO2 oxygen vacancies (Scheme 1), which is the rate-determining step during the methanol photo-oxidation [39,41].
Table 1 summarizes and compares the catalytic performances, including CH3OH conversion, selectivity toward methyl formate, and formation rate of methyl formate, over these reported photocatalysts in the selective photo-oxidation of methanol into methyl formate (in the gas phase at room temperature). Surprisingly, the CH3OH conversion was largely promoted when the IB metal NPs, particularly the Cu species, were immobilized on the surface of TiO2.

3. Ethanol Conversion

3.1. Hydrocarbons (Biofuels) via Thermal Reactions

In the transportation sector, liquid fuel is one of the important sources of energy. It can be traditionally achieved from fossil-based resources on an industrial scale. In recent decades, with the rapid emergence of renewable biomass energy, the plant-based industry is a new opportunity for producing sustainable biofuels with a high-energy density. It exhibits a similar chemical structure to liquid fuel [45,46,47,48]. The production of biofuels has attracted particular interest. Bioethanol, known as “cellulosic ethanol”, appears as a green and important chemical, which can be obtained from various plant materials [10], and the ethanol can react with aldehydes via the cross-aldol condensation in the presence of various base catalysts [49]. The cross-aldol condensation usually is viewed as an effective method to synthesize biofuels via C−C bond formations. Currently, this method extends to oxidation condensation, which could provide a new platform for hydrocarbon biofuels production [50,51].
The preparation of C9-C13 biofuels with cellulosic ethanol in the liquid phase has emerged as a promising and versatile protocol, Figure 6. The supported nanogold catalysts exhibited excellent catalytic activity in ethanol oxidation with cinnamaldehyde. It finally gave the C11-C13 hydrocarbons [52]. A selectivity as high as 70% for C11-C13 hydrocarbon could be achieved by the Au/NiO catalyst via a one-pot cascade reaction, viz. cross aldol condensations using K2CO3 as cocatalyst, Figure 7 [53]. Then it was via a full hydrodeoxygenation with hydrogen gas. The ethanol was activated to acetaldehyde (CH3CHO*) at the sites of NiO oxide’s oxygen vacancies, supported by EtOH-TPD and TGA analyses. Then the CH3CHO* reacts with cinnamaldehyde at the interfacial perimeter of the Au/NiO composite during the cascade reactions. The whole catalytic conversions were monitored by in situ infrared spectroscopy investigations.

3.2. Ethanal via Photocatalysis

The atomically precise metal nanoclusters with certain crystal structures have been synthesized as a kind of well-defined model nanocatalysts in selective oxidations [54,55,56]. The mono-dopant into a metal particle at a specific position can well tailor its electronic property and thus modify its catalytic performances. For example, Qin and coworkers developed a strategy to dope a mono-Ag-atom at the central site of rod-shaped Au13Ag12(PPh3)10Cl8 nanoclusters to a “pigeon-pair” cluster of {[Au13Ag12(PPh3)10Cl8]·[Au12Ag13(PPh3)10Cl8]}2+ [57,58]. The single-atom exchange between Au13Ag12 and Au12Ag13 nanoclusters induced a significant perturbation to the electronic structure, which can result in a difference in catalytic activity [59,60,61]. Thus, Au13Ag12 and Au13Ag12·Au12Ag13 clusters, both being supported on TiO2, were used in the photocatalytic conversion of ethanol in order to compare the catalytic performance [62]. The cluster catalysts were evaluated in the selective aerobic oxidation of ethanol gas under a UV irradiation at 30 °C. Au13Ag12·Au12Ag13 clusters gave a higher ethanol conversion (34%), which is ~1.5-fold over that of the Au13Ag12 clusters (23%), Figure 8B. Further, the selectivity toward ethanal on the Au13Ag12-Au12Ag13 clusters (79%) is slightly higher than that on Au13Ag12 clusters (72%), but the product distribution is very similar for two catalysts, suggesting that the conversion mechanism over both catalysts should be same. In all, the single-atom exchange (Au for Ag) in M25 clusters lead to distinct electronic properties indeed makes a significant influence on the catalytic activity.

4. Oxidation of D-Glucose to Gluconic Acid

The activated carbon (AC) supported Au nanoparticles have previously been reported as a catalyst for selective aerobic oxidation of D-glucose to gluconic acid [63,64,65,66]. This result prompted the investigation of the catalytic performance of AC-supported Au38(SR)24 for the oxidation of D-glucose [67]. Impressively, the annealed sample of Au38(SR)24/AC-120 catalyst showed high activity and better catalytic performance than Au38/AC-150 and Au38/AC-300 (120, 150, and 300 °C indicates the annealing temperature in the air). It has been demonstrated that the desorption of thiol occurs at ~200 °C, which suggests that the partial removal of thiols in Au38(SR)24/AC-120 catalyst provides highly active sites than more thiol ligands removal at 150 °C or the complete removal of thiols at 300 °C. The turnover frequency (TOF) for Au38(SR)24/AC-120 was ~5440 h−1, which is found to be even higher than the commercially available Pd/AC, Pd-Bi/AC, and Au/AC. Furthermore, excellent recyclability also could be found with Au38(SR)24/AC-120 catalyst.
The reasonable reaction mechanism for the above-described aerobic oxidation of D-glucose catalyzed by Au25(SR)18/AC is shown in Figure 6. Here, the terminal -CHO group of D-glucose molecule first selectively adsorbs on the staple of Aun(SR)m clusters, and O2 is activated on activated carbon in the presence of bases simultaneously. Subsequently, –CHO is selectively oxidized to the –COOH/–COO− group. In the last, gluconates desorbed and detached from the Au clusters in the alkaline medium. Thus, the staple motif has a critical role to play here in enhancing the catalytic activity. Further, Au25(SR)18 (1.1 nm), Au38(SR)24 (1.2 nm), and Au144(SR)60 (1.7 nm) were used to exemplify the size dependence of Au nanocluster catalysts [68]. Experimental results showed that all clusters have excellent catalytic activity with 98% selectivity and follow the order: Au144(SR)60/AC > Au38(SR)24/AC > Au25(SR)18/AC (equal moles of nanoclusters, the molar ratio of glucose/NC was fixed at 18,000:1). Rationally, the above size dependence is attributed to the effect of the core size of metal nanoclusters.
At the same time, Guo et al. [69] prepared TiO2-supported ultrasmall gold cluster catalysts (particle’s size: 1.2–1.7 nm) with a simple incipient wetness method and used anthranilic acid as a stabilizing agent. Surprisingly, The Au/TiO2 with surface Auδ+ species (annealed at 200 and 500 °C in the air), corroborated by XPS and Operando-DRIFTS analyses (Figure 9B), showed inactive in the base-free reaction condition for oxidation of glucose. However, the Au/TiO2 with only surface metallic Au0 species (annealed at 150 and 200 °C in the presence of H2 gas) exhibited salient catalytic performance (87–92% conversion and 95–97% selectivity for gluconic acid), revealing that the metallic Au0 sites are very important for glucose oxidation in this reaction system. Note that the by-product in the oxidation was fructose by isomerization of glucose (Figure 9A). The turnover frequency of Au/TiO2 could be achieved to 1908 molreacted glucose molAu−1 h−1, which is 1.5-fold of the commercial Pd-Bi/C catalysts with alkaline existence (TOF: 1298 molreacted glucose molPd−1 h−1, NaOH solution with a pH 9.5), and the apparent activation energies are comparable to the unsupported Au clusters, also indicating that the oxidation should occur at Au surface rather than at the perimeter interface between Au clusters and supports (Figure 9C). This study gave some clues that the metallic gold particle is the catalytically active center for the aerobic glucose oxidation conversion to gluconic acid.

5. Conclusions, Challenges, and Future Perspective

We fabricated the aerobic oxidation of biomass into highly valuable chemicals via green catalytic systems over the supported copper and gold nanoclusters catalysts, which led to some significant breakthroughs, as highlighted below:
(1)
Three types of oxidations were achieved, photo-oxidation of methanol to methyl formate over CuOx/TiO2 nanocomposites, ethanol to hydrocarbons biofuels over Au/NiO, and glucose oxidation to gluconic acid catalyzed by Au/activated carbon.
(2)
The titania supports copper oxide clusters with different morphology of nanosheets, nanospindles, and nanotubes have been designed to investigate the catalytic performance in the photo-oxidation reaction of the method.
(3)
The active-site identification and creation in the aerobic oxidation were exemplified. The CuOx/TiO2{101} interface was identified in the photo-oxidation of methanol, and only the metallic Au0 clusters were clarified to be active-site for the glucose oxidation.
(4)
It has been observed that the single-atom-exchanging in the metal clusters largely affects the catalytic activity instead of product selectivity. However, the detailed mechanism is still unknown.
(5)
By the ATR-IR spectra method, we clearly mapped out the whole conversion pathway and worked out the controversy in this photocatalysis.
However, there are still some following points for utmost consideration:
(1)
In the future, more efforts must be put into creating novel photo/catalysts with specific active reaction sites for biomass conversions [70,71].
(2)
In the future, sincere efforts will be put forward to develop more biomass conversion systems.
(3)
DFT studies with in situ characterizations must be advanced to establish plausible reaction mechanisms.
(4)
Attempts must be made to increase the reaction scales to meet the industrial needs, especially the photo-oxidation reactions [72].
(5)
Alloy metal nanoparticle catalysts need to be exploited in the biomass conversions, as the electronic property can be well modified to tailor their catalytic performances.
(6)
Finally, in the near future, we will try to expand our horizons in other different fields of catalysis [73,74,75].

Author Contributions

Investigation, Y.Z. and C.C.; resources, Y.Z. and C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z., C.C. and G.L.; writing—review and editing, G.L.; supervision, G.L.; project administration, C.C. and G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, J.S.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y. Methyl formate as a new building block in C1 chemistry. Appl. Catal. 1990, 57, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nwosu, U.; Wang, A.; Palma, B.; Zhao, H.; Khan, M.A.; Kibria, M.; Hu, J. Selective biomass photoreforming for valuable chemicals and fuels: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 148, 111266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, Y.L.; Lu, G.Z.; Mo, X.H.; Wang, Y.S. Vapor phase dehydrogenation of methanol to methyl formate in the catalytic membrane reactor with Cu/SiO2/ceramic composite membrane. Catal. Lett. 2005, 99, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Xu, W.W.; Han, Z.-K.; Waheed, A.; Ye, Z.; Li, G.; Baiker, A. Continuous Di-methyl Carbonate Synthesis from CO2 and Methanol over BixCe1-xOδ Monoliths: Effect of Bismuth Doping on Population of Oxygen Vacancies, Activity, and Reaction Pathway. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 1366–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.; Tang, Q.; Ye, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; Pu, H.; Li, G. Monolithic ZnxCe1−xO2 catalysts for catalytic synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from CO2 and methanol. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 12522–12530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tatibouët, J. Methanol oxidation as a catalytic surface probe. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1997, 148, 213–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Forzatti, P.; Tronconi, E.; Elmi, A.S.; Busca, G. Methanol oxidation over vanadia-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1997, 157, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Qin, Z.; Tian, S.; Ye, Z.; Ye, L.; Abroshan, H.; Li, G. TixCe1−xO2 Nanocomposites: A Monolithic Catalyst for Direct Conversion of Carbon Dioxide and Methanol to Dimethyl Carbonate. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 4642–4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kou, H.; Lu, C.H.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.K.; Xu, Z.Z.; Varma, R.S. Selectivity Enhancement in Heteroge-neous Photocatalytic Transformations. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1445–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Badwal, S.P.S.; Giddey, S.; Kulkarni, A. Direct ethanol fuel cells for transport and stationary applications—A comprehensive review. Appl. Energy 2015, 145, 80–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, C.; Liu, S.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Zhao, Z. Butterfly-Like Tetranuclear Copper(I) Clusters for Efficient Alkyne Homocoupling Reactions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 2021, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shi, Q.; Qin, Z.; Ping, G.; Liu, S.; Xu, H.; Li, G. Alkynyl- and Phosphine-Ligated Quaternary Au2Ag2 Clusters Featuring an Alkynyl-AuAg Motif for Multicomponent Coupling. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 21650–21655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Subrahmanyam, A.V.; Thayumanavan, S.; Huber, G.W. C-C Bond Formation Reactions for Bio-mass-Derived Molecules. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 1158–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shi, Q.; Qin, Z.; Xu, H.; Li, G. Heterogeneous Cross-Coupling over Gold Nanoclusters. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liu, Z.; Tong, X.; Liu, J.; Xue, S. A smart catalyst system for the valorization of renewable furfural in aliphatic alcohols. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ning, L.; Liao, S.; Cui, H.; Yu, L.; Tong, X. Selective Conversion of Renewable Furfural with Ethanol to Produce Furan-2-acrolein Mediated by Pt@MOF-5. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 6, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, Y.; Li, G. A Critical Review on Carbon-Carbon Coupling over Ultra-Small Gold Nanoclusters. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 1297–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cavani, F.; Albonetti, S.; Basile, F.; Gandini, A. Chemicals and Fuels from Bio-Based Building Blocks; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, F.; Wen, Z.; Qin, Z.; Fang, Q.; Ge, Q.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Li, G. Manganese cluster induce the control synthesis of RHO- and CHA-type silicoaluminaphosphates for dimethylether to light olefin conversion. Fuel 2019, 244, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Delidovich, I.; Hausoul, P.J.C.; Deng, L.; Pfützenreuter, R.; Rose, M.; Palkovits, R. Alternative Monomers Based on Lignocellulose and Their Use for Polymer Production. Chem. Rev. 2015, 116, 1540–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wen, Z.; Li, Z.; Ge, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, J.; Abroshan, H.; Li, G. Robust nickel cluster@Mes-HZSM-5 composite nanostructure with enhanced catalytic activity in the DTG reaction. J. Catal. 2018, 363, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ping, G.; Zheng, K.; Fang, Q.; Li, G. Composite Nanostructure of Manganese Cluster and CHA-Type Sili-coaluminaphosphates: Enhanced Catalytic Performance in Dimethylether to Light Olefins Conversion. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Biella, S.; Prati, L.; Rossi, M. Selective Oxidation of D-Glucose on Gold Catalyst. J. Catal. 2002, 206, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anastassiadis, S.; Morgunov, I.G. Recent Pat. Biotechnology 2007, 1, 167–180. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hanson, A.D.; Roje, S. One-carbon metabolism in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.; Zhan, E.; Cai, W.; Li, J.; Shen, W. Methanol Selective Oxidation to Methyl Formate over ReOx/CeO2 Catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2007, 120, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaiser, D.; Beckmann, L.; Walter, J.; Bertau, M. Conversion of Green Methanol to Methyl Formate. Catalysts 2021, 11, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, Q.; Wei, X.; Raza, A.; Li, G. Recent Advances in Aerobic Photo-Oxidation of Methanol to Valuable Chemicals. ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 3381–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, Q.; Ping, G.; Wang, X.; Xu, H.; Li, J.; Cui, J.; Abroshan, H.; Ding, H.; Li, G. CuO/TiO2 heterojunction composites: An efficient photocatalyst for selective oxidation of methanol to methyl formate. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 2253–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wittstock, A.; Zielasek, V.; Biener, J.; Friend, C.M.; Baumer, M. Nanoporous Gold Catalysts for Selective Gas-Phase Oxidative Coupling of Methanol at Low Temperature. Science 2010, 327, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kominami, H.; Sugahara, H.; Hashimoto, K. Photocatalytic selective oxidation of methanol to methyl formate in gas phase over titanium(IV) oxide in a flow-type reactor. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, J.; Han, C.; Yang, X.; Gao, G.; Shi, Q.; Tong, M.; Liang, X.; Li, C. Methyl formate synthesis from methanol on titania supported copper catalyst under UV irradiation at ambient condition: Performance and mechanism. J. Catal. 2016, 333, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Russier, V.; Badiali, J. Calculation of the electronic work function of Cu and Ag from an extended jel-lium model. Phys. Rev. B 1989, 39, 13193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Guo, S.; Zhang, S.H.; Fang, Q.H.; Abroshan, H.D.; Kim, H.; Haruta, M.; Li, G. Gold-Palladium Nanoalloys Supported by Graphene Oxide and Lamellar TiO2 for Direct Synthesis of Hydrogen Per-oxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 40599–40607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kollhoff, F.; Schneider, J.; Li, G.; Barkaoui, S.; Shen, W.; Berger, T.; Diwald, O.; Libuda, J. Anchoring of carboxyl-functionalized porphyrins on MgO, TiO2, and Co3O4 nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 24858–24868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shao, B.; Zhao, W.; Miao, S.; Huang, J.; Wang, L.; Li, G.; Shen, W. Facet-dependent anchoring of gold nanoparticles on TiO2 for CO oxidation. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 1534–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, H.; Liu, C.; Wang, M.; Zhang, C.; Luo, N.; Wang, Y.; Abroshan, H.; Li, G.; Wang, F. Visible Light Gold Nanocluster Photocatalyst: Selective Aerobic Oxidation of Amines to Imines. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 3632–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, Q.Q.; Qin, Z.X.; Yu, C.L.; Waheed, A.; Xu, H.; Gao, Y.; Abroshan, H.; Li, G. Experimental and mechanistic understanding of photo-oxidation of methanol catalyzed by CuO/TiO2-spindle nano-composite: Oxygen vacancy engineering. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, S.; Gong, X.; Shi, Q.; Ping, G.; Xu, H.; Waleed, A.; Li, G. CuO Nanoparticle-Decorated TiO2-Nanotube Heterojunctions for Direct Synthesis of Methyl Formate via Photo-Oxidation of Methanol. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 15942–15948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, Q.; Wang, Y.; Guo, S.; Han, Z.-K.; Ta, N.; Li, G.; Baiker, A. NO reduction with CO over CuOx/CeO2 Nanocomposites: Influence of Oxygen Vacancies and Lattice Strain. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 6543–6552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, W.L.; Liu, C.; Abroshan, H.D.; Ge, Q.J.; Yang, X.J.; Xu, H.Y.; Li, G. Catalytic CO Oxidation Using Bimetallic MxAu25-x Clusters: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study on Doping Effects. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 10261–10267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, C.; Yang, X.; Gao, G.; Wang, J.; Lu, H.; Liu, J.; Tong, M.; Liang, X. Selective oxidation of methanol to methyl formate on catalysts of Au–Ag alloy nanoparticles supported on titania under UV irradiation. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3603–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, X.Y.; Yang, X.Z.; Gao, G.J.; Li, C.F.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhang, W.D.; Chen, X.T.; Zhang, Y.B.; Zhang, B.B.; Lei, Y.Q.; et al. Performance and mechanism of CuO/CuZnAl hydrotalcites-ZnO for photo-catalytic selective oxidation of gaseous methanol to methyl formate at ambient temperature. J. Catal. 2016, 339, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lisowski, P.; Colmenares, J.C.; Łomot, D.; Chernyayeva, O.; Lisovytskiy, D. Preparation by sonopho-todeposition method of bimetallic photocatalysts Pd-Cu/TiO2 for sustainable gaseous selective oxidation of methanol to methyl formate. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2016, 411, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alonso, D.M.; Bond, J.Q.; Dumesic, J.A. Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1493–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oumer, A.; Hasan, M.; Baheta, A.T.; Mamat, R.; Abdullah, A. Bio-based liquid fuels as a source of renewable energy: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 88, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, C.; Brück, T.; Lercher, J.A. Catalytic deoxygenation of microalgae oil to green hydrocarbons. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1720–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bridgwater, A. Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 2003, 91, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huber, G.W.; Chheda, J.N.; Barrett, C.J.; Dumesic, J.A. Production of Liquid Alkanes by Aque-ous-Phase Processing of Biomass-Derived Carbohydrates. Science 2005, 308, 1446–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhang, G.; Wang, R.; Li, G. Non-metallic gold nanoclusters for oxygen activation and aerobic oxidation. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, G.; Jiao, W.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, Z.; Yan, Y.; Feng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y. A Scalable Upgrading of Concentrated Furfural in Ethanol: Combining Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley Reduction with in Situ Cross Aldol Condensation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4316–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fang, Q.; Qin, Z.; Shi, Y.; Liu, F.; Barkaoui, S.; Abroshan, H.; Li, G. Au/NiO Composite: A Catalyst for One-Pot Cascade Conversion of Furfural. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 2654–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shi, Y.; Tian, S.; Shi, Q.; Waheed, A.; Cao, Y.; Li, G. Cascade aldol condensation of an aldehyde via the aerobic oxidation of ethanol over an Au/NiO composite. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 3654–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Shi, Q.; Qin, Z.; Sharma, S.; Li, G. Recent Progress in Heterogeneous Catalysis by Atomically and Structurally Precise Metal Nanoclusters. Chem. Rec. 2021, 21, 879–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zheng, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, D.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, G. Motif-mediated Au25(SPh)5(PPh3)10X2 nanorods with conjugated electron delocalization. Nano Res. 2018, 12, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Qin, Z.; Sharma, S.; Wan, C.-Q.; Malola, S.; Xu, W.-W.; Häkkinen, H.; Li, G. A Homoleptic Alkynyl-Ligated [Au13Ag16L24]3- Cluster as a Catalytically Active Eight-Electron Superatom. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 970–975. [Google Scholar]
  57. Qin, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wan, C.; Liu, S.; Abroshan, H.; Jin, R.; Li, G. Atomically precise nanoclusters with reversible isomeric transformation for rotary nanomotors. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qin, Z.; Hu, S.; Han, W.; Li, Z.; Xu, W.W.; Zhang, J.; Li, G. Tailoring optical and photocatalytic properties by single-Ag-atom exchange in Au13Ag12(PPh3)10Cl8 nanoclusters. Nano Res. 2021, 15, 2971–2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, H.; Yuan, X.; Yao, Q.; Xie, J. Shining Photocatalysis by Gold-based Nanomaterials. Nano Energy 2021, 88, 106306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Z.; Qin, Z.; Cui, C.; Luo, Z.; Yang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Lai, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Fang, X.; et al. In-Situ Generation and Global Property Profiling of Metal nanoclusters by Ultraviolet Laser Dissociation-Mass Spectrometry. Sci. China Chem. 2022, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Qin, Z.; Zhao, D.; Zhao, L.; Xiao, Q.; Wu, T.; Zhang, J.; Wan, C.; Li, G. Tailoring the Stability, Photocatalysis and Photoluminescence Properties of Au11 Nanocluster via Doping Engineering. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 2529–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Du, X.; Huang, Y.; Pan, X.; Han, B.; Su, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Li, M.; Tang, H.; Li, G.; Qiao, B. Size-dependent strong metal-support interaction in TiO2 supported Au nanocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ishida, T.; Kinoshita, N.; Okatsu, H.; Akita, T.; Takei, T.; Haruta, M. Influence of the support and the size of gold clusters on catalytic activity for glucose oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9265–9268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Perovic, M.; Tarakina, N.V.; Hofmann, J.P.; Oschatz, M. Influence of Local Environments in Pores of Different Size on the Catalytic Liquid-Phase Oxidation of d-Glucose by Au Nanoparticles Supported on Nanoporous Carbon. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 7695–7703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, H.; Toshima, N. Glucose oxidation using Au-containing bimetallic and trimetallic nanoparticles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cattaneo, S.; Stucchi, M.; Villa, A.; Prati, L. Gold Catalysts for the Selective Oxidation of Biomass-Derived Products. ChemCatChem 2018, 11, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, C.; Hong, F.; Zhou, Y.; Li, G.; Haruta, M. Efficient Aerobic Oxidation of Glucose to Gluconic Acid over Activated Carbon-Supported Gold Clusters. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1976–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Huang, J.; Liu, C.; Hong, F.; Zheng, K.; Li, G. Size dependence of gold clusters with precise numbers of atoms in aerobic oxidation of d-glucose. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 16879–16886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guo, S.; Fang, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, G. Efficient base-free direct oxidation of glucose to gluconic acid over TiO2-supported gold clusters. Nanoscale 2018, 11, 1326–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Almada, C.C.; Kazachenko, A.; Fongarland, P.; Perez, D.D.S.; Kuznetsov, B.; Djakovitch, L. Supported-Metal Catalysts in Upgrading Lignin to Aromatics by Oxidative Depolymerization. Catalysts 2021, 11, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Raza, A.; Zhang, X.; Ali, S.; Cao, C.; Rafi, A.A.; Li, G. Photoelectrochemical Energy Conversion over 2D Materials. Photochem 2022, 2, 272–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Roman, K.; Barwicki, J.; Hryniewicz, M.; Szadkowska, D.; Szadkowski, J. Production of Electricity and Heat from Biomass Wastes Using a Converted Aircraft Turbine AI-20. Processes 2021, 9, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cao, Y.; Su, Y.; Xu, L.; Yang, X.; Han, Z.; Cao, R.; Li, G. Ionic liquids modified oxygen vacancy-rich amorphous FeNi hydroxide nanoclusters on carbon-based materials as an efficient electrocatalyst for electrochemical water oxidation. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 71, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shi, Q.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, L.; Liu, B.; Zhang, J.; Xu, H.; Han, Z.; Li, G. In-situ exfoliation and assembly of 2D/2D g-C3N4/TiO2(B) hierarchical microflower: Enhanced photo-oxidation of benzyl alcohol under visible light. Carbon 2022, 196, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, X.; Shi, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Xu, H.; Ding, H.; Li, G. Facile assembly of InVO4/TiO2 heterojunction for enhanced photo-oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomass 02 00007 g001 550
Figure 1. The global consumption of methyl formate update to 2019.
Figure 1. The global consumption of methyl formate update to 2019.
Biomass 02 00007 g001
Biomass 02 00007 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic system of photo-oxidation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [29]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Figure 2. Schematic system of photo-oxidation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [29]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Biomass 02 00007 g002
Biomass 02 00007 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM images of the CuO/TiO2 with different morphologies: (A) CuO/TiO2-S, (B) CuO/TiO2-P, and (C) CuO/TiO2-T. Reproduced with permission from Refs. [29,38,39]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019. Springer, 2020, and American Society of Chemistry, 2020.
Figure 3. TEM images of the CuO/TiO2 with different morphologies: (A) CuO/TiO2-S, (B) CuO/TiO2-P, and (C) CuO/TiO2-T. Reproduced with permission from Refs. [29,38,39]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019. Springer, 2020, and American Society of Chemistry, 2020.
Biomass 02 00007 g003
Biomass 02 00007 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) CH3OH conversion and (B) selectivity toward methyl formate over CuO/TiO2–S. (C) The catalytic performances at different O2 concentrations. (D) Durability test. Relationship of formation rate of methyl formate (MF) with (E) the concentration of OV and (F) PL intensity. Reproduced with permission from Refs. [28,38,39]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019, Springer, 2020, and American Society of Chemistry, 2020.
Figure 4. (A) CH3OH conversion and (B) selectivity toward methyl formate over CuO/TiO2–S. (C) The catalytic performances at different O2 concentrations. (D) Durability test. Relationship of formation rate of methyl formate (MF) with (E) the concentration of OV and (F) PL intensity. Reproduced with permission from Refs. [28,38,39]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019, Springer, 2020, and American Society of Chemistry, 2020.
Biomass 02 00007 g004
Biomass 02 00007 g005 550
Figure 5. ATR-IR spectra of CuO/TiO2 in the dark (A) and under a 365 nm light (B). (C) Tentative mechanism. Reproduced with permissions from Ref. [38]. Springer, 2019.
Figure 5. ATR-IR spectra of CuO/TiO2 in the dark (A) and under a 365 nm light (B). (C) Tentative mechanism. Reproduced with permissions from Ref. [38]. Springer, 2019.
Biomass 02 00007 g005
Biomass 02 00007 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Main steps in methanol photo-oxidation to methyl formate over photocatalysts.
Scheme 1. Main steps in methanol photo-oxidation to methyl formate over photocatalysts.
Biomass 02 00007 sch001
Biomass 02 00007 g006 550
Figure 6. Conversion pathway of biomass furfural to C7-9 hydrocarbons over the Au/NiO catalysts (Inset, TEM image). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [52]. American Chemical Society, 2019.
Figure 6. Conversion pathway of biomass furfural to C7-9 hydrocarbons over the Au/NiO catalysts (Inset, TEM image). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [52]. American Chemical Society, 2019.
Biomass 02 00007 g006
Biomass 02 00007 g007 550
Figure 7. Conversion pathway from cinnamaldehyde to C11-13 hydrocarbons. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [49]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Figure 7. Conversion pathway from cinnamaldehyde to C11-13 hydrocarbons. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [49]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Biomass 02 00007 g007
Biomass 02 00007 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) Metal-exchanging at the central site of M25 clusters. (B) Photocatalytic performance in the ethanol conversion. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [53]. Springer, 2022.
Figure 8. (A) Metal-exchanging at the central site of M25 clusters. (B) Photocatalytic performance in the ethanol conversion. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [53]. Springer, 2022.
Biomass 02 00007 g008
Biomass 02 00007 g009 550
Figure 9. (A) Isomerization of glucose and fructose and the glucose conversion to gluconic acid via aerobic oxidations. (B) Operando-DRIFTS CO adsorption over Au/TA-200 catalysts at −150 °C. (C) Plausible mechanism for the aerobic oxidation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [69]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Figure 9. (A) Isomerization of glucose and fructose and the glucose conversion to gluconic acid via aerobic oxidations. (B) Operando-DRIFTS CO adsorption over Au/TA-200 catalysts at −150 °C. (C) Plausible mechanism for the aerobic oxidation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [69]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Biomass 02 00007 g009
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the methyl formate synthesis via photo-oxidation at ambient temperature (25 °C).
Table 1. Comparison of the methyl formate synthesis via photo-oxidation at ambient temperature (25 °C).
PhotocatalystsCH3OH ConversionMethyl Formate SelectivityMethyl Formate Formation Rate (mmolCH3OH gcat.−1 h−1)Refs.
A-TiO210%91%1.5[30]
P2527%56%1.8[42]
Ag/TiO275%80%7.3[42]
Au/TiO265%75%5.9[42]
Cu/TiO265%55%4.4[32]
CuO/CuZnAl80%60%5.8[43]
Pd–Cu/TiO2-P9053%80%5.7[44]
CuO/TiO2-S95%84%10.8[29]
CuO/TiO2-P97%83%10.5[38]
CuO/TiO2-T93%90%22.9[39]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Cao, C.; Li, G. Recent Progress in Green Conversion of Biomass Alcohol to Chemicals via Aerobic Oxidation. Biomass 2022, 2, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2020007

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Cao C, Li G. Recent Progress in Green Conversion of Biomass Alcohol to Chemicals via Aerobic Oxidation. Biomass. 2022; 2(2):103-115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2020007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yifei, Changhai Cao, and Gao Li. 2022. "Recent Progress in Green Conversion of Biomass Alcohol to Chemicals via Aerobic Oxidation" Biomass 2, no. 2: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2020007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop