You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Encyclopedia
  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

18 November 2025

Smart Fasteners and Washers for Preload and Loosening Detection: A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
2
Growermetal S.p.A, 23885 Calco, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Section Engineering

Abstract

This systematic review investigates the state of the art of smart fasteners and smart washers. The collected documents were systematically classified, focusing on fasteners and washers equipped with embedded sensors capable of detecting flaws, corrosion, cracks, or monitoring features like structural response, applied load, and preload. The review emphasizes sensor technologies rather than devices made from smart materials. A total of 148 documents were found through electronic databases, of which 32 were thoroughly analyzed and categorized into 5 categories depending on the sensing capabilities, actuating capabilities, ability to transmit data, and their combinations. The analysis showed that most devices incorporate piezoelectric materials as sensing or actuation elements, primarily aimed at detecting fastener loosening or monitoring preload and load in fastened joints. Despite progress, several challenges limit industrial adoption, including sensor integration affecting bolt integrity, durability and calibration issues, and high costs. Few studies address scalability or measurement performance, highlighting the need for reliable, low-cost, and industrially scalable solutions.

1. Introduction

Bolts, nuts, cap screws and rivets are used for joining parts into a structural assembly; their characteristics must be chosen to ensure integrity under service conditions that may induce loosening, such as vibration and fluctuating loads []. Since its introduction, bolted joints have been extensively adopted in both civil and mechanical engineering applications to create non-permanent joints, thanks to their high strength and ease of use. Given that such joints are often subjected to complex, multi-axial loading, their design requires careful consideration. Particularly when considering that the connection is influenced by cyclic loading and various working conditions [,,,,].
Since accidents may occur because of loosened bolted joints, periodic manual and visual inspection is adopted for structures such as bridges, skyscrapers, power plants, and aerospace applications. However, manual and visual inspection is time-consuming and subject to human actions [,]. Several techniques can be used to inspect bolted joints, such as visual inspection for surface condition monitoring, Non-Destructive Inspection (NDI) for corrosion detection, or acoustic emission to detect material loss gaps that could cause structural integrity loss. Still, these techniques do not provide continuous monitoring of the joint. In this contest, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) plays a fundamental role, as SHM is the process of continuously assessing the integrity and performance of structures through embedded or attached sensors and data interpretation methods that convert measurements into meaningful information on the structure status []. Recent work by Zhaoet al. [] demonstrated the effectiveness of machine learning models for assessing structural information based on measurement data. Moreover, as highlighted in the in [], advances in smart sensing technologies have significantly expanded the applicability of SHM, enabling real-time detection of corrosion, fatigue, and cracks in complex structures. The use of smart monitoring systems that do not need human involvement brings several advantages: they are effective, reliable, cost-effective, repeatable, accurate, and, often, they do not require heavy structural changes. Beyond force monitoring, innovative sensors are integrated into bolted joints to support structural health monitoring and facilitate predictive maintenance strategies for timely fault identification [,,,]. Within this framework, smart fasteners and washers represent a specific class of localized SHM nodes, capable of capturing load, strain, or damage information directly at the joint level. The sensing element can be either the bolt or the washer. Both of them are considered in this systematic review.
To the best of our knowledge to date, there are no studies focused on the systematic review summarizing the available technologies for smart fasteners and washers, both for structures and production systems.
The paper is structured as follows: the search strategy, eligibility criteria, and data analysis procedures are described in Section 2. Section 3 presents the results of the systematic review on sensing techniques applied to bolts and washers. Section 4 summarizes the results and critically analyzes the different techniques. Paper conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

Our research focused on bolts and washers with a generic sensing function. Keywords were derived from the synonyms of the word smart (intelligent, innovative) and the term fastener (screw, bolt, washer).
A systematic literature search was conducted in December 2023 on Scopus, Google Patents, Patentscope, and the ASME Digital Collection databases. Customized queries, including the previously identified keywords and Boolean logic with AND/OR operators, were entered in the search engines, in a form like the following example: TITLE (smart OR intelligent OR innovative) AND TITLE (fastener OR screw OR bolt OR washer) AND ABS (detect OR find OR measure OR determine). The research was also limited by including only documents with the type “paper” or “patent” with a date limit set to 1990.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria and Study Selection

The collected documents were classified as Important, Relevant, or Irrelevant. The classification was performed by first defining three core concepts (i.e., Aim, Context, and Tools) from the objective statement defined before. The Aim was defined as “fastener or washer which has functions to detect any kind of flaws, corrosion, cracks, or other useful features like structural response, applied load, preload, etc.”; the Context as “structural members, machine/assembly components, industrial processes, and vehicles”; the Tools as “any kind of sensor”.
The documents were classified according to the following systematic procedure:
  • if the document is a duplicate, it is automatically excluded;
  • if the document cannot be retrieved or if is not in English language, is excluded;
  • if the document does not match the Aim, it is labeled as Irrelevant;
  • if the document matches Aim, Context, and Tools, it is labeled as Important;
  • if the document matches Aim and Context or Tools, it is labeled as Relevant;
  • else it is labelled as Irrelevant.

2.3. Data Synthesis and Analysis

All the documents labeled as Important or Relevant were formalized into Article Cards, a document that summarizes the article’s fundamental information allowing easier consultation, comparison, and reference. The Article Card structure was inspired by Cicero’s “Rhetoricorum, seu De inventione rhetorica” and it contains for each document the most relevant information: filing number, citation number, title, relevance index (as given by the document classification process), a summary, plus the answer to the questions:
  • Quis? (Authors);
  • Quando? (Year);
  • Ubi? (Context or type of structure);
  • Cur? (Aim of the invention/study);
  • Quid? (Methods/Tools);
  • Quomodo? (Tests and results).
Table 1 shows an Article Card example, while the full document can be provided. Three independent reviewers performed the screening and the analysis of each record.
Table 1. An example of Article Card of the document [].

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search Results

A total of 155 documents were retrieved from the electronic databases. 45 of them were excluded as duplicates, and 21 documents were not available or not in English. In total, 39 documents were included; 26 were labeled as Important and 13 as Relevant. Document screening led to the exclusion of 50 papers that failed to meet the inclusion criteria. Of the included ones, 24 are research papers, while 14 are patents, and 1 is a book chapter. The overall selection process of the reviewed documents is summarized in Figure 1, following a PRISMA-like flow diagram to illustrate the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion steps. PRISMA checklist has been uploaded as Supplementary Materials.
Figure 1. Flow diagram illustrating the selection process of the studies included in the review.

3.2. Description of the Included Documents

Results of the review have been divided into two main categories: screws or bolts (16 papers, 8 patents, and 1 book chapter) and washers (8 papers and 6 patents). Smart fasteners can be grouped into three main categories:
  • Smart Material Fasteners, which use materials that adapt or respond to structural or environmental changes [,,,,].
  • Sensorized Fasteners, that incorporate different transducer families to monitor tension, temperature, or other physical parameters [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,].
  • Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Fasteners use radio frequency to track and identify fasteners wirelessly [].
Other fasteners combine these technologies, such as those that incorporate a transducer and RFID capabilities [,]. Similarly, smart washers were grouped into:
  • Sensorized Washers, in which a transducer provides real-time data of preload or other physical characteristics [,,,,,,,,,].
  • Sensorized + RFID Washers, that sense information from the environment and also benefit from RFID for wireless communications [,,].
  • Sensorized + Smart Material Washers, which adapt their material characteristics in response to environmental factors and transmit data via RFID [].
Figure 2 presents the classification scheme of the reviewed technologies, outlining the main categories and subcategories of smart fasteners and smart washers. A summary of the documents’ category and relevance is presented in Table 2, in the following sections, only articles classified as important or relevant will be discussed. Table 2 is organized as follows: the important works are listed first, followed by the relevant works, and finally the non-relevant works. Within each category, studies on fasteners are presented first, followed by those on washers.
Figure 2. Conceptual classification of smart fastener and washer technologies according to sensing principles and functionality.
Table 2. Document list specifying subdivision (cluster) and relevance index.

3.3. Summary of Evidence

3.3.1. Smart Material Fasteners

In industrial and critical applications, Shape Memory Alloys (SMA) elements are engineered to utilize their unique thermo-mechanical properties to create high-integrity connections. This is commonly achieved by using a pre-deformed SMA component, which, upon thermal activation, attempts to recover its memorized shape, generating a uniform clamping force against the surrounding joint members []. The use of SMA components in shrink-fit joints enables an easier and more reliable assembly process that is less sensitive to surface quality and tooling errors, resulting in superior axial fixation and high friction forces []. Furthermore, this technology extends to maintaining structural health; for example, SMA elements can function as self-repairing actuators in bolted joints, automatically restoring lost torque and preload when a joint loosens, significantly increasing the long-term reliability of the assembly []. In civil engineering, SMA fasteners are also employed as key components in self-centering systems for seismic applications, providing both energy dissipation during an event and the necessary restoring force to bring the structure back to its original position [].
An interesting approach in the field of smart material fasteners is the one presented in [] where Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP) steels are used. These alloys can show a phase transition under stress from a non-magnetic austenitic phase to a ferromagnetic martensitic phase. The state of the bolt is assured by monitoring the change in the alloy’s magnetic properties.

3.3.2. Sensorized Fasteners

Different sensors can be integrated into the fastener body, as analyzed in fourteen relevant documents. The proposed solutions use different transducing elements positioned at distinct locations within the fastener. We identified the following categories based on transduction principles:
  • strain gauges to measure axial force and bending torque independently [] or to measure torsional strain and associated preload [].
In [], the sensorized fastener is manufactured through metal forming, with strain-sensitive elements directly integrated during fabrication. The authors demonstrated that this configuration provides multidirectional load monitoring, good mechanical–electrical coupling, and thermal compensation; however, challenges remain in terms of calibration complexity, long-term fatigue resistance, and industrial scalability.
In [] a 3D-printed smart screw was fabricated and tested, demonstrating an additive manufacturing approach where the sensing functionality is co-fabricated with the polymeric fastener itself. This method offers design freedom and cost-effective production for lightweight or prototyping applications, yet its mechanical performance, signal stability, and anisotropic material behavior limit its use in high-load environments.
  • piezoelectric or ultrasonic transducers to measure load or apply strain in a longitudinal direction [,,,].
Early developments, such as those described in [], rely on external ultrasonic transducers to measure bolt elongation through time-of-flight (ToF) variations induced by the acoustoelastic effect, enabling non-invasive and real-time preload control during tightening. More advanced concepts integrate piezoelectric elements directly within the fastener head, as demonstrated by the embedded PZT-based smart bolt [] (where PZT, or lead-zirconate-titanate, is a piezoelectric ceramic material capable of converting mechanical stress into electrical signals), which eliminates the need for coupling agents and allows continuous, in situ monitoring of axial stress with improved accuracy. Complementary research extends the functionality of piezoelectric fasteners beyond preload sensing: multifunctional designs embed coupled sensor–actuator systems to enable active vibration control and impedance-based SHM, effectively merging actuation and diagnostics in a single compact device []. Additionally, ultrasonic Lamb wave–based implementations [] exploit the fastener as both transmitter and receiver, forming distributed SHM networks capable of detecting cracks or delamination over wide structural areas.
  • piezoelectric cable embedded in a bolt to monitor structural health by measuring relative displacements of joints and structural vibrations []. The key strengths of the presented approach are ease of installation and low cost, making it suitable for retrofitting existing structures. However, its limited sensitivity to static loads, potential calibration drift, and reliance on wired data acquisition restrict its use to short-term or localized monitoring.
  • multielement electrochemical sensing array to detect corrosion [,]. The system presented in [] integrates an electrochemical smart sensor directly into an aircraft fastener to enable in situ detection of early-stage corrosion. It autonomously monitors key environmental parameters. The sensor array is embedded within the fastener head and connected to a Common Electronics Unit for data storage and later retrieval via a portable computer.
  • broadband acoustic emission transducer to assess structural integrity by identifying signs of metal fatigue and cracking [];
  • optical unit (emitter/receiver) combined with temperature or moisture sensors to measure strain []. This patent presents an optical smart bolt with a reflective sensor embedded in an axial cavity to track elongation and preload continuously. The system offers high precision and immunity to electromagnetic interference, but it may weaken the bolt and require temperature compensation. Its complexity and cost restrict its use to critical, high-value applications.
  • fiber optic and Fiber Bragg Gratings (FBG) sensors to measure axial forces, shear forces, preload or to monitor creep [,,,,,,].
FBG sensors are primarily embedded within the fastener’s shaft to measure axial elongation, thereby enabling accurate determination of preload and continuous long-term monitoring for creep and loosening [,]. Beyond axial measurement, FBG configurations have been specially adapted to measure shear forces (transverse strain), providing critical insights into joint slippage and rigidity loss []. A major technical challenge for reliable deployment remains the sensor’s cross-sensitivity to temperature, which necessitates complex compensation; this is being addressed by innovative self-compensating designs that aim to isolate strain from thermal effects [].
In many cases, the fastener geometry must be changed to allow the positioning of the transducing element. The bolt may present a hollow structure with longitudinal [,,,] or radial [,,,] holes []. Alternatively, transducers can be mounted in slots on the fastener wall [] or on the top/bottom of the fastener head in a permanent or removable manner [,,,,]. The recent advances in additive manufacturing have allowed building the body of the fastener around the sensor system []. In many cases, the necessary electronics are located inside the fastener’s body [,,,].
Figure 3 illustrates the eight categories used to classify the sensorized fasteners.
Figure 3. Classification of sensorized fasteners into eight categories based on their sensing principles and functional characteristics.

3.3.3. RFID Fasteners

These devices are equipped with RFID antennas communicatively coupled with an integrated circuit including a memory. These devices can be used to easily store and share logistic data, such as time and date of installation, grip length of the fastener, type of fastener, identity of installer, location of the fastener on the item being fabricated, maintenance and revision information, fastener equipment used for installation, and any other relevant information [].
In [], a fastener is presented that utilizes an integrated RFID chip coupled to a two-state microswitch. This microswitch functions as a binary torque value sensor, designed to signal whether the fastener torque is within the specification value or not within the specification value. Crucially, the RFID tag memory stores the prescribed torque specification for each fastener, ensuring correct installation. Moreover, the system allows rapid verification of multiple fasteners through a scanning inspection method, significantly reducing inspection time by eliminating manual torque checks. The microswitch is installed beneath the head of the fastener, where it remains in contact with the clamped surface under a defined pressure. The same minimum torque detection could be achieved by putting a ground pin inside the fastener body and in contact with the RFID antenna, such that wireless communication cannot be established. When a torque is applied to the fastener, its body elongates, disconnecting the RFID antenna from the ground pin, allowing the RFID system to communicate the data stored in the memory, such as the fastener identification number. In this way, it is possible to check the correct torque state of the fastener [].

3.3.4. Smart Washers

Smart washers are mainly used for load or preload measurement and fastener loosening detection. They can be divided into two categories: passive washers [,,,,,,,] and active washers [,,,,,]. Passive washers measure the force applied to themselves from the outside, while active washers generate ultrasonic excitation and measure the corresponding mechanical response.
Seven documents present smart washers based on piezoelectric transducers [,,,,,,] while four documents present smart washers based on strain gauges [,,,]. Two documents introduce a smart washer based on fiber optics with FBG sensors [,] and one document presents a smart washer based on smart material in combination with Hall effect sensor []. Smart sensorized washers can also integrate RFID tags for wireless communication [,,].
In [], the authors present a smart washer composed of two annular disks in which the contact surface is reduced to a few spherical points by machining some sections of the disks into convex and concave, respectively. The convex and concave sections are realized with different radii (i.e., convex smaller than concave) to produce a single point of contact with a small surface for each machined section. Each annular disk has a piezoelectric patch bonded to its non-contact surface: one acts as an actuator emitting ultrasonic waves through the interface, while the other functions as a receiver detecting the transmitted signal. The transmitted energy correlates with the actual contact area between the disks, which depends on the bolt preload Indeed, increased load presses together the convex and concave sections, increasing the contact area between the two of them. Similarly, in [], two smart washers were developed by integrating piezoceramic patches into pre-machined metal rings. The two washers are mounted on opposite sides of a bolt; one acts as an actuator generating stress waves, while the other functions as a sensor detecting their transmission across the bolted interface. A time-reversal approach is applied, where the signal acquired by the sensing washer is temporally inverted and retransmitted. The reversed signal is then received back from the emitter and the temporal and spatial focusing properties are analyzed to monitor the degradation of the bolted connection in time. Further, a smart washer can be realized by coupling a cantilevered plate with a piezoelectric actuator, enabling integrated sensing and actuation for dynamic characterization [,,]. Through this system, it is possible to detect bolt loosening by measuring the variation in the dynamic characteristics of the smart washer system due to the variation in the tightening axial tension. The loosening of the bolted joint is quantitatively assessed through variations in the natural frequency of the smart washer system.
Other possible variations in an active washer are presented in [], in which a washer can include a transducer manufactured as a segmented series, such as quadrants of piezoelectric crystals recessed into four cavities in the washer body. Alternatively, a ring-shaped transducer or multiple concentric ring-shaped transducers may be recessed, respectively, into single or multiple ring-shaped cavities. Different non-destructive inspection methods can be applied through these smart washers. For instance, a single active washer can operate in pulse-echo mode for one-sided inspection, while a pair positioned on opposite sides of a bolted joint enables through-transmission testing. The resulting data can then support defect detection, structural health assessment, and condition-based maintenance strategies.
FBG sensors also represent a valuable option for smart fastening systems. In [] the FBG sensor is embedded within a circumferential groove to monitor preload by directly measuring the resulting circumferential strain. This approach effectively converts axial clamping forces into measurable radial strain. Other designs exploit intentionally induced non-uniform strain fields across the FBG to monitor bolt torque, producing a measurable spectral broadening (FWHM) that correlates linearly with the applied torque, thus enabling dual-purpose sensing []. Figure 4 illustrates the categories used to classify the sensorized washers.
Figure 4. Classification of sensorized washer into categories based on their sensing principles and functional characteristics.

4. Summary and Discussion

4.1. Smart Fasteners

4.1.1. What to Measure

Standards such as ISO 16047 [] and ASTM F606 [] specify methods to verify the torque of bolted joints to ensure structural integrity, prevent loosening, and maintain safety. These standards represent a barrier to the adoption of technologies that monitor quantities other than torque. Since they focus primarily on torque as the key parameter for ensuring structural integrity and safety, alternative approaches—such as monitoring preload, bolt elongation, or strain—face challenges in gaining widespread acceptance. While many solutions based on strain gauges or FBGs enable the measurement of bolt preload, deriving the corresponding torque from axial strain is not a straightforward process. Therefore, in the future, it will be necessary to adapt the current standards or safety procedures to replace the torque verification with some of the techniques currently used for bolt state monitoring.

4.1.2. Strain Sensors

A common method to embed sensors into sensorized fasteners is by using a hollow structure in which the sensor is inserted. However, fasteners with a hole to carry the sensor present reduced load-carrying capacity when compared to whole structures. The reduction in load capacity can be offset by employing higher-strength materials. In [], a rectangular cross-section sensor body is built, and three strain gauges are applied on three different faces of the sensor body to identify axial forces and bending torques independently. The whole sensor body is inserted in a hollow load-carrying structure in the form of a bolt. Similarly, FBG sensors are integrated into the fastener body through holes drilled in the bolt. Different designs are proposed: in [,,] where an optical fiber containing one or more FBGs is inserted through a centrally drilled fastener and secured to the inner walls using adhesive; alternatively, four FBG sensors were embedded into the fastener body through multiple drilled holes [] to measure the stress distribution in the fastener body. One FBG is placed centrally and used to measure the axial stress, while the other three are equally spaced at 120° from each other and surrounding the central FBG to measure the shear and bending loads. In [], an optical fiber with a single FBG, half of which is metalized, is inserted into the cavity of a 3D-printed bolt. This smart fastener monitors the bolt’s load conditions and offers self-compensation for temperature variations, ensuring accurate measurements under varying conditions. In all these cases, a reduction in bolt load capacity is expected. In [], a reusable bolt tension monitor is introduced, where an FBG sensor is temporarily embedded inside the bolt shaft using fusible paraffin wax or thermoplastic adhesive. This configuration allows precise measurement of the clamping force while maintaining the bolt’s structural integrity and enabling quick sensor installation, removal, and reuse. The thermoplastic-embedded sensor provides stable and linear strain transfer, accurately tracking preload changes and relaxation effects in both steel–steel and steel–composite joints. More recently, Yang et al. [] embedded FBG sensors directly into stainless-steel M20 bolts to evaluate how the embedding depth and radial position influence sensitivity. The optimal configuration, with the sensor positioned 7 mm from the bolt center in a fully penetrated bolt, achieved the highest sensitivity (0.00296 nm/N·m, R2 = 0.9984). Light is also used in [], where the smart fastener has a control unit and an optical unit in conjunction with additional sensors, such as temperature or moisture sensors. The optical unit includes a light emitter and a detector to send light pulses into a cavity obtained in the fastener body, and to receive back the reflected light. The control unit measures the Time of Flight (ToF) of the reflected light signal and computes the physical deformation of the faster body to obtain the strain. Alternatively, for fiber optic and light emission, a piezoelectric sensor in the form of a cable, covered with a cylinder of urethane resin, was inserted into a hollow bolt structure in []. When the bolt deforms due to an external action, the piezoelectric cable also deforms, generating a voltage signal correlated to the applied strain.

4.1.3. Corrosion Sensing

Other than a hollow structure, a dangerous reduction in load-carrying capacity of the fastener can also be caused by external factors, such as corrosion. Conventional Non-Destructive Inspection (NDI) methods, such as infrared or visible light imaging, eddy current, acoustic emission (AE), and X-ray techniques, are effective for detecting surface buildup or material loss but cannot reliably identify hidden or inaccessible corrosion. To address this limitation, ref. [] proposed a smart aircraft fastener capable of in situ electrochemical corrosion detection. The fastener integrates a corrosion-sensing element and embedded electronics within a standard HI-LOK fastener body (HI-LOK is a lightweight, two-piece aerospace fastener system, comprising a threaded pin and a self-locking breakoff-collar, it is designed to provide precise, uniform preload and high tensile strength in extreme environments). A multifunctional applicability is achieved with the incorporation of a broadband acoustic emission transducer to detect structural integrity related to metal fatigue and cracking. To detect corrosion, a multielement electrochemical sensor is located in a corrosion-sensing environmental chamber inside the fastener. Corrosive electrolytes seep into the environmental chamber through multiple radial capillary tubes in the fastener wall. Consequently, the electrochemical sensor measures the electrolyte’s properties and stores the data in analog memory for later analysis. Similarly, the Smart Aircraft Fastener Evaluation (SAFE) system [] is being developed to enable early detection of hidden corrosion in aircraft structures. It is based on a smart multielement sensor array composed of three working electrodes and a platinum reference electrode. Each is designed to measure pH, chloride ion concentration, and the free potential of 2024 aluminum, respectively. The sensor outputs a voltage proportional to ion concentration, which is processed and stored by the SAFE electronics.

4.1.4. Smart Materials and Active Fasteners

Hundreds of works focused on the development of fasteners that use Shape Memory Alloys to modify the bolt characteristics in the presence of a phase transition and are not the objective of this review. In [], the transition from a non-magnetic material to a ferromagnetic material when subjected to strain was detected by the variation in a coil inductance. The contactless technique provides a signal proportional to the damaged state of the bolt; optimal performance can be achieved by machining a stress-concentration groove beneath the bolt head and placing the detection coil either in the groove or within a washer.
Structural characteristics can be modified by Piezoelectric materials [,] with different arrangements. For instance, attaching a ring-shaped piezoceramic element beneath the bolt head generates a strain along the bolt’s longitudinal axis.

4.1.5. Piezoelectric Active and Passive Sensors

Piezoelectric elements can be used as passive sensors, i.e., by measuring the charge generated by the load applied on the element, or as vibration generators. In this second case, small piezoceramic elements can be sandwiched between two elements; when the piezoelectric element vibrates, the proof mass exerts an inertial force on the joined structure. In other solutions [], the piezoceramic element is bonded to the center of the bolt head using epoxy glue and an external pulse generator/receiver, as in ultrasonic non-destructive testing; in this case, the bolt preload is estimated starting from the linear relationship between the change in ToF and the bolt preload.
In general, these systems work at ultrasonic frequencies, and the amount of energy is sufficient to detect structural modifications of the bolt and the neighboring elements.

4.2. Smart Washers

4.2.1. Advantages

The main advantage of smart washers is that they do not require a reduction in the bolt section; on the other hand, their total volume is usually smaller than that of the fastener, and therefore, the miniaturization of the sensing elements may lead to a reduced sensitivity.

4.2.2. Strain Measurements

Strain gauge-based solutions are nowadays commercially available and allow measuring the preload between the bolt head and the joint surface. Miniaturized strain gauges can be positioned in different configurations to measure bending, axial, and radial load, and strain gauges are commonly connected in a Wheatstone bridge configuration to reduce the interfering effects of temperature and to increase the sensitivity.
Strain can be measured by wrapping an FBG sensor around the washer []. The axial force exerted on the washer induces strain at the outer diameter, which is directly proportional to the axial strain, as governed by Poisson’s ratio. Typically, this strain ranges from 30% to 40% of the axial strain, resulting in inherently noisier measurements. A different approach based on FBG sensors is presented in [], where a method for torque monitoring in composite connections is described. The FBG was embedded in the laminate beneath a specially designed washer that imposed a controlled nonuniform strain field on the grating. The spectral broadening of the reflected signal, measured through the full width at half maximum (FWHM), exhibited a monotonic and nearly linear relationship with the applied torque, allowing the sensor to simultaneously function as a conventional strain gauge.

4.2.3. Smart Materials

Similarly to what has been previously shown for fasteners, also in the case of washers, there are several solutions based on shape memory alloys. In other applications, magnetostrictive alloys (Galfenol) combined with bias magnets and a Hall-effect sensor have been employed. The washer enables real-time bolt-tightness monitoring and supports wireless data transmission. When the bolt is tightened, compressive stress on the washer alters Galfenol’s magnetic properties. The Hall-effect sensor detects this change, and with proper magnetic biasing of the washer, bolt load is measured by deriving the relationship between the applied stress and the magnetic variation.

4.3. Data Transmission

The transmission of data is a key point of smart systems. To date, many existing solutions are cabled or embedded with the electronic conditioning system, usually composed of an A/D converter, a microcontroller, and a system for data transmission. Other solutions include RFID technology [,,], in which the RFID tag stores fastener-specific information such as a unique ID, specified torque value, installation date and location, as well as the most recent inspection. Additionally, in the referred documents, a two-state detection is established employing a microswitch or a ground pin technology (as explained in Section 3.3.3) to provide a binary torque condition signal. Also, in this case, the lack of standardization among structural monitoring solutions represents a limit to the diffusion of smart elements.

4.4. Summary

Most proposed approaches are based on piezoceramic (PZT) transducers, with 11 studies employing PZT or ultrasonic techniques—4 applied to fasteners and 7 to washers. FBG-based solutions account for 9 works (7 for fasteners and 2 for washers), while strain-gauge-based approaches are represented by 6 studies (2 on fasteners and 4 on washers). These results can be explained by the fact that both PZT and FBG sensors enable miniaturized and easily embeddable solutions. PZT sensors often allow for a more comprehensive evaluation, monitoring not only the joint condition but also the structural response, whereas FBGs are attractive due to their multiplexing capability and immunity to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Among the important categories, the most cited works are [,,], and []. Study [], with 119 citations, presents a bolt looseness monitoring approach based on the Time Reversal Energy Transfer Matrix technique, which employs piezoceramic transducers embedded in a washer for active sensing. This method is effective, easy to implement on existing bolted joints, and suitable for in situ applications. In [], a low-cost bolt preload monitoring method using a PZT transducer embedded in the bolt head and fixed with epoxy is proposed, eliminating the need for couplants required in traditional ultrasonic probes. This approach achieves high accuracy and stability, with a relative error of about 1%, making it a promising technique for precise preload measurement. Works [] (84 citations) and [] (80 citations) propose FBG-based solutions, implemented, respectively, on a washer [] and on a bolt [].
Within the relevant category, the most cited studies are [,], which discuss the application of shape memory alloys (SMA) in structural health monitoring (SHM) and industrial contexts, along with [], a patent describing a load-sensing system with RFID-tagged fasteners, and [], which presents a smart washer sensor with convex–concave contact surfaces and dual piezoelectric patches that uses the time reversal method to overcome saturation and accurately monitor bolt preload across the full range.
Table 3 reports an analysis of the works classified as important in terms of the following aspects:
Table 3. Summary of the works marked as “important” in Table 1.
  • Support type
  • Technology/sensor
  • Measurement type
  • Measurement evaluation
  • Integration level
  • Cost/scalability
It is interesting to note that most studies propose embedded solutions, a choice that undoubtedly enhances system robustness against external factors. However, cost and scalability evaluations are discussed in only a few works, highlighting a gap between academic research and the practical implementation of the proposed solutions. Similarly, the assessment of measurement accuracy and output evaluation is often poorly reported, suggesting the need for more comprehensive validation in future studies.
The review includes both conference or peer-reviewed journal articles and patents describing comparable technological solutions. The consistency of information across independent academic and industrial sources supports a moderate-to-high overall confidence in the synthesized evidence.

5. Conclusions

In this review, 155 documents were retrieved from electronic databases, both papers and patents. After the selection procedure, 39 documents were analyzed and classified to provide a detailed overview of the existing technologies related to smart fasteners and smart washers. The first classification was performed concerning the type of technology characterizing each fastener and washer. The identified categories for smart fasteners are smart material (5 documents), sensorized (17 documents), RFID (1 document), and sensorized plus RFID (2 documents); whereas smart washers belong to sensorized (10 documents), sensorized plus RFID (3 documents), and sensorized plus smart material (1 document) categories.
Results of the analysis showed that smart fasteners and washers are mainly based on piezoelectric elements and FBG sensors, even if some specific variant exists that include an electrochemical multielement array to detect corrosion (in the case of smart fasteners) or strain gauges.
Both devices can take advantage of RFID to enable wireless communication capabilities. Finally, the main objective of the smart elements resulted to be the identification of preload and loads acting on the joints and can be used for structural health monitoring to improve safety in critical applications.
Despite significant progress, this review highlights several technical challenges that currently limit the industrial adoption of smart fasteners. A major issue remains with the need to modify the bolt geometry to embed sensors, which can compromise load capacity and fatigue resistance. FBG sensors require complex temperature compensation, embedded strain gauges face calibration and long-term durability challenges, and solutions based on piezoelectric cables or 3D-printed polymers often suffer from reduced sensitivity or signal instability under high loads. Approaches relying on optical units or complex electronics are further constrained by high costs and integration difficulties. Moreover, few works discuss the scalability, cost, and measurement performance of the proposed approach. Despite many sensing solutions having proven feasible, further efforts are needed to develop methods that ensure industrial scalability at low cost and provide reliable long-term monitoring.
The search strategy was limited to selected academic databases and patent repositories, and relevant industrial documents not publicly indexed may have been missed.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/encyclopedia5040196/s1, PRISMA checklist. Reference [] is cited in the Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization S.D.C., G.L., R.M.R.M., P.C., S.M. and M.T.; methodology, S.D.C., G.L. and R.M.R.M.; investigation, S.D.C., G.L. and R.M.R.M.; data curation, S.D.C., G.L. and R.M.R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D.C. and G.L.; writing—review and editing, P.C., S.M. and M.T.; visualization, S.D.C.; supervision, S.M. and M.T.; project administration, P.C., S.M. and M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the company Growermetal S.p.A within the activities of JRP MATT.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

P.C. is an employee of Growermetal S.p.A. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Smith, J.D.; Pothier, S.G. Load Sensing System Including RFID Tagged Fasteners. U.S. Patent US 11/460,819, 19 August 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Huo, L.; Chen, D.; Liang, Y.; Li, H.; Feng, X.; Song, G. Impedance based bolt pre-load monitoring using piezoceramic smart washer. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 057004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, S.; Huang, S.S. Intelligenter Befestiger. Europe Patent EP2803871A1, 2 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Groche, P.; Brenneis, M. Manufacturing and use of novel sensoric fasteners for monitoring forming processes. Measurement 2014, 53, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yin, H.; Wang, T.; Yang, D.; Liu, S.; Shao, J.; Li, Y. A Smart Washer for Bolt Looseness Monitoring Based on Piezoelectric Active Sensing Method. Appl. Sci. 2016, 11, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eslami, B.; Ganye, R.; Bunai, C.; Thamire, C. Smart Fasteners and Their Application in Flanged Joints Available to Purchase. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Houston, TX, USA, 9–15 November 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tanaka, T.; Okugawa, M. Adopting supervisor for bolt loosening detection by using smart washer. In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Ellicott City, MD, USA, 28–30 October 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akdeniz; Kollgaard, J.; Malkin, M. Active Washers for Monitoring Bolted Joints. U.S. Patent US7698949, 20 April 2010.
  9. Chen, H.-P.; Ni, Y.-Q. Introduction to Structural Health Monitoring. In Structural Health Monitoring of Large Civil Engineering Structures; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, H.-W.; Zhang, X.; Ding, Y.; Guo, T.; Li, A.; Soh, C.-K. Probabilistic mixture model driven interpretable modeling, clustering, and predicting for physical system data. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2025, 160, 112069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Z. Smart Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring and Nondestructive Evaluation. Sensors 2024, 24, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, G. Strain-Gsuged Washer for Measuring Bolt Preload. U.S. Patent US9719900B1, 1 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schoess, J.N.; Havey, G.D. Smart Fastener. U.S. Patent US5549803A, 27 August 1996. [Google Scholar]
  14. Aske, J.; Wilson, J.; Smith, R.; Berden, M. Intelligent Fasteners. U.S. Patent 11,074,490, 27 July 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoon, H.-S. A new design concept for multifunctional fasteners using smart materials. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. White, P. Stress Induced Connecting Assembly. U.S. Patent US20010028148A1, 4 February 2003. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu, M.H.; Schetky, L.M. Industrial Application for Shape Memry Alloy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 30 April–4 May 2000; Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:10721921 (accessed on 30 October 2025).
  18. Park, G.; Muntges, D.E.; Inman, D.J. Self-repairing joints employing shape-memory alloy actuators. Smart Struct. Mater. 2003, 55, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Menna, C.; Auricchio, F.; Asprone, D. Chapter 13—Applications of Shape Memory Alloys in Structural Engineering. In Shape Memory Alloy Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 369–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thompson, L.D.; Westermo, B.D.; Crum, D.B.; Law, W.; Trombi, R.; Waldbusser, R. Smart structural fasteners for the aircraft and construction industries. In Smart Structures and Materials 1999: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schoess, J.N.; Seifert, G. Smart fastener for KC-135 structural integrity monitoring. In Smart Structures and Materials 1997: Smart Sensing, Processing, and Instrumentation; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kibblewhite, E.; Molsbergen, R. Thread Forming Fasteners for Ultrasonic Load Measurement and Control. WO Patent WO2004027271A3, 1 July 2004. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yoon, H.-S.; DeCicco, R. Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Smart Fasteners for Structural Health Monitoring. In Nondestructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gräbner, D.; Dödtmann, S.; Dumstorff, G.; Lucklum, F. 3-D-printed smart screw: Functionalization during additive fabrication. Sens. Sens. Syst. 2018, 7, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, L.; Feng, T.; Ho, M.; Jiang, T.; Song, G. A smart “shear sensing” bolt based on FBG sensors. Measurement 2018, 122, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, Q.; Yuan, B.; Mu, X.; Sun, W. Bolt preload measurement based on the acoustoelastic effect using smart piezoelectric bolt. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28, 055005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shah, N.; Chandler, W.K.; Madsen, C.; Way, D.R. Smart Fastener and Smart Insert for a Fastener Using Fiber Bragg Gratings to Measure Strain and Temperature. U.S. Patent US8433160B2, 30 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pran, K.; Farsund, O.; Wang, G. Fibre Bragg grating smart bolt monitoring creep in bolted GRP composite. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Optical Fiber Sensors Conference Technical Digest, Portland, OR, USA, 10 May 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shimoi, N.; Cuadra, C.H.; Madokoro, H.; Saijo, M. Simple Smart Piezoelectric Bolt Sensor for Structural Monitoring of Bridges. Int. J. Instrum. Sci. 2013, 1, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Klasén, W. Intelligent Bolt and System Therefor. U.S. Patent US10066930B2, 4 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, T.; Liu, W.; Gao, H.; Wang, N.; Xia, K.; Li, R.; Tan, Y.; Zhou, Z. FBG-Based Force Sensing with Temperature Self-Compensation for Smart Bolts. Sens. Actuators 2024, 379, 115872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, W.S.; Chiang, C.C.; Hsu, H.C. Monitoring torque in bolts using an embedded fiber Bragg grating sensor. Optik 2023, 291, 171294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khomenko, A.; Koricho, E.G.; Haq, M.; Cloud, G.L. Bolt tension monitoring with reusable fiber Bragg-grating sensors. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 2015, 51, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, D.; Huo, L.; Li, H.; Song, G. A Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG)-Enabled Smart Washer for Bolt Pre-Load Measurement: Design, Analysis, Calibration, and Experimental Validation. Sensors 2018, 8, 2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kamentser, B.; Kamentser, E. Washer Having Stressed and Unstressed Strain Gauges. U.S. Patent US6250863B1, 26 June 2001. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ito, H.; Okugawa, M. Natural frequency identification of smart washer by using adaptive observer. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huo, L.; Chen, D.; Kong, Q.; Li, H.; Song, G. Smart washer—A piezoceramic-based transducer to monitor looseness of bolted connection. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 025033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Okugawa, M.; Tanaka, T. Effect on detection sensitivity for smart washer configuration and ambient temperature characteristics on bolted joint. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yeager, M.; Whitaker, A.; Todd, M. A method for monitoring bolt torque in a composite connection using an embedded fiber Bragg grating sensor. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 29, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. White, D.J.; Velderman, M.J.; Seman, A.E.; Lemieux, C.W.; Hill, G. System for Wireless Retrieval of Measured Component Data. U.S. Patent US11937032B2, 19 March 2024. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhu, S.S.; Huang, S.S. Intelligent Washer. U.S. Patent US10941802B2, 9 March 2017. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jaffrey, A. McNaney. Smart Washer for Preload Monitoring. U.S. Patent US9964135B2, 5 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
  43. Raghunath, G.; Barkley, B.; Flatau, A.B. Smart washers to measure bolt loads using magnetostrictive galfenol. In Proceedings of the 23rd AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 5–9 January 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. You, R.; Ren, L.; Song, G. A Novel Comparative Study of European, Chinese and American Codes on Bolt Tightening Sequence Using Smart Bolts. Int. J. Steel Struct. 2020, 20, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seyoum, B.; Rossi, M.; Brunelli, D. A self-powered wireless bolt for smart critical fastener. In Proceedings of the 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), Geneva, Switzerland, 6–9 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Evans, K.E.; Alderson, K.L. Auxetic materials: The positive side of being negative. Eng. Sci. Educ. J. 2000, 9, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hemingway, T.L.; Jackson, N.; Murray, T.; Pipp, W.B., Jr.; Danby, M.R.; Reznar, J.F. Smart Material Actuated Fasteners. U.S. Patent US20140017025A1, 8 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rudduck, D.; Blattmann, L.D. Development in Beam Type Fasteners. U.S. Patent US8066462B2, 29 November 2011. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kim, J.S.; Lee, D.Y.; Koh, J.S.; Jung, G.P.; Cho, K.J. Component assembly with shape memory polymer fastener for microrobots. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 23, 015011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dementyev, A.; Vega Gálvez, T.; Olwal, A. SensorSnaps: Integrating Wireless Sensor Nodes into Fabric Snap Fasteners for Textile Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technolog, New Orleans, LA, USA, 20–23 October 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vokoun, D.; Sedlák, P.; Frost, M.; Pilch, J.; Majtás, D.; Šittner, P. Velcro-like fasteners based on NiTi micro-hook arrays. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011, 20, 085027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Duval, L. Intelligent Fasteners. U.S. Patent US6671185B2, 30 December 2003. [Google Scholar]
  53. Blier, K.M. Surgical Fastener. U.S. Patent US20120043367A1, 1 January 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Criscuolo, C.J.; Heinrich, R.S.; Azarbarzin, K. Absorbable Fastener and Applying Apparatus. U.S. Patent US8034076B2, 11 October 2011. [Google Scholar]
  55. Jeffries, L.; Lentink, D. Design Principles and Function of Mechanical Fasteners in Nature and Technology. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2020, 72, 050802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sorensen, E.; Coffland, D.W.; Song, H.J.; Chang, C.-M. Radio-Frequency-Identification-Based Smart Fastener. U.S. Patent US20210159943A1, 28 February 2023. [Google Scholar]
  57. Choi, Y.-T.; Purekar, A.S.; Wereley, N.M. Torque Loss and Crack Monitoring Near Fasteners for Isotropic and Composite Helicopter Tail Boom Structural Models. In Proceedings of the Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Oxnard, CA, USA, 21–23 September 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Browne, L.; Johnson, N.L. Active Material Based Fasteners Including Cable Ties and Twist Ties. U.S. Patent US8230555B2, 31 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
  59. David, H.A.; Sarh, B.; Zanteson, W.P. Intelligent Fastener Installation System. U.S. Patent US7703669B2, 27 April 2010. [Google Scholar]
  60. Xu, L.; Zhang, J.; Luo, J. Simulation Study on Intelligent Bolt Monitoring System Based on Cloud Service. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1746, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gamboa, J.D.; Slesinski, R.J.; Zanteson, W.P.; Hoeckelman, L.A. Intelligent Fastener System. U.S. Patent US20110113613A1, 17 March 2015. [Google Scholar]
  62. Eshghinejad, A.; Elahinia, M.; Goel, V.K. Functionality Evaluation of a Novel Smart Expandable Pedicle Screw to Mitigate Osteoporosis Effect in Bone Fixation: Modeling and Experimentation. Smart Mater. Res. 2013, 2013, 840413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Deress, D.; Martin, Z. Development and testing of an innovative fastener for use with cladding over foam sheathed wood framed walls. In Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2015, Portland, OR, USA, 23–25 April 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Martinez, P.; Al-Hussein, M.; Ahmad, R. Ahmad. Intelligent vision-based online inspection system of screw-fastening operations in light-gauge steel frame manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 109, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guru, S.M.; Fernando, S.; Halgamuge, S.; Chan, K. Intelligent fastening with A—BOLT TM technology and sensor networks. Assem. Autom. 2004, 24, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. White, S.M.; Rousseau, M.S. The Use of an Innovative Mechanical Fastening Technology to Replace Failed Fixing Bolts and Extend the Useful Life of Anchored Steel Bulkheads; ASCE: Reston, VA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sevostianov, V. Magnetostrictive self-diagnosing smart bolts. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineer-ing Congress and Exposition, Montreal, QC, Canada, 14–20 November 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Baroudi, U.; Mekid, S.; Bouhraoua, A. Bolt Tension Monitoring System. U.S. Patent US20130139604A1, 28 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kurtz, D. Load Washer Transducer Assembly. U.S. Patent US4079624A, 21 March 1978. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kropp, H.C. Load Washer. U.S. Patent US5222399A, 29 June 1993. [Google Scholar]
  71. Sang-yoon, O.; Seong-min, K.; Jung-Hoon, K. RFID Tag Type Washer. U.S. Patent KR102079937B1, 24 February 2024. [Google Scholar]
  72. Takeuchi, K. Washer-Type Pressure Sensor. U.S. Patent US4566316A, 28 January 1986. [Google Scholar]
  73. Van Est, J.; Chauprade, F.; Sartelet, M. Piezoelectric Washer for Accelerometer Sensor with Resistive Path on Its External Contour. U.S. Patent FR3074361B1, 29 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang, B.; Huo, L.; Chen, D.; Li, W.; Song, G. Impedance-Based Pre-Stress Monitoring of Rock Bolts Using a Piezoceramic-Based Smart Washer-A Feasibility Study. Sensirs 2017, 17, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Seneviratne, L. On the use of mechatronics for intelligent screw insertions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. ETFA ’96, Kauai, HI, USA, 18–21 November 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Brown, J.; Rich, A.M.; Gorkom, A.R.V. Smart Surgical Screwdriver. U.S. Patent 11871975, 16 January 2024. [Google Scholar]
  77. Parhar, S. Artificial Intelligent Washer System. U.S. Patent US20210355621A1, 18 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
  78. Stergiopoulou, A.; Stergiopoulos, V.; Kalkani, E. Contributions to the study of hydrodynamic behaviour of innovative Archimedean screw turbines recovering the Hydropotential of watercourses and of coastal currents. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Athens, Greece, 5–7 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wei, T.-C.; Yen, C.-Y.; Kuo, K.-L. Intelligent Screw Supplier with Auto-Count and Alarm Function and Method Thereof. U.S. Patent US20070298650A1, 27 December 2007. [Google Scholar]
  80. Menon, M.G.; Harder, R.T.; Narasimaiah, P.S.; Mulinti, M. Occupant Weight Sensing Using Intelligent Fastener and Vertical Load Transmitting Brackets. U.S. Patent US8766112B2, 1 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  81. Belkoff, S.; Langdale, E.; Knight, T. Smart Screw-Driver for Preventing Inadvertent Screw Stripping in Bone. U.S. Patent US9743971B2, 29 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
  82. Gallucci, G.O.; Finelle, G.; Papadimitriou, D.E.V.; Lee, S.J. Innovative approach to computer-guided surgery and fixed provisionalization assisted by screw-retained transitional implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2015, 30, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Antony, S.; Drissi-Habti, M.; Raman, V. Numerical Analysis to Enhance Delamination Strength around. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 3154904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Indartono, Y.S.; Heriawan, H.; Kartika, I.A. Innovative and flexible single screw press for the oil extraction of Calophyllum seeds. Res. Agric. Eng. 2019, 65, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pachner, S.; Miethlinger, J. Smart data analysis for optimized manufacturing of powder coatings on co-rotating twin screw extruders. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2055, 070010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lekhaa, T.; Rajeshwari, S.; Sequeira, J.A.; Akshayaa, S. Intelligent Shopping Cart Using Bolt Esp8266 Based on Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 15–16 March 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Azamfar, M.; Li, X.; Lee, J. Intelligent ball screw fault diagnosis using a deep domain adaptation methodology. Mech. Mach. Theory 2020, 151, 103932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Riaz, N.; Shah, S.I.A.; Rehman, F.; Khan, M.J. An Intelligent Hybrid Scheme for Identification of Faults in Industrial Ball Screw Linear Motion Systems. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 35136–35150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hosseini, S.M.; Mashiri, F.; Mirza, O.; Hart, B. Structural performance of steel-concrete composite bridges utilising innovative blind bolt shear connectors. Steel Compos. Struct. 2021, 40, 581–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lin, W.-J.; Chen, J.-W.; Young, H.-T.; Hung, C.-L.; Li, K.-M. Developing the Smart Sorting Screw System Based on Deep Learning Approaches. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fu, P.; Chen, Y.-L.; Zeng, Q.-K.; Xiang, L.-K. Research on an intelligent ball-screw measuring instrument. In Measurement Technology and Intelligent Instruments; SPIE: Wuhan, China, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Eliasson, J.; Delsing, J.; Raayatinezhad, A.; Kyusakov, R. A SOA-based framework for integration of intelligent rock bolts with internet of things. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Cape Town, South Africa, 25–28 February 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. ISO 16047; Fasteners—Torque/Clamp Force Testing. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  94. ASTM F606; Standard Test Methods for Determining the Mechanical Properties of Externally and Internally Threaded Fasteners, Washers, Direct Tension Indicators, and Rivets. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2023.
  95. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.