Next Article in Journal
Agroeconomics: Theoretical Foundations and Evolution of Thought
Previous Article in Journal
Quantum Computing: A Concise Introduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Entry

The Application of NMR-Based Metabolomics in the Field of Nutritional Studies

by
Gianfranco Picone
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, Cesena FC, 47521 Bologna, Italy
Encyclopedia 2025, 5(4), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040174
Submission received: 8 September 2025 / Revised: 8 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 19 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Chemistry)

Definition

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics has emerged as a powerful analytical technique in nutritional science, enabling comprehensive profiling of metabolites in biological samples. This entry explores the integration of NMR metabolomics in nutrition research, highlighting its principles, methodological considerations, and applications in dietary assessment, nutritional interventions, and biomarker discovery. The entry also addresses the advantages and limitations of NMR compared to other metabolomic techniques and discusses its future potential in personalized nutrition and health monitoring.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, the complex connection between diet and human wellness has received considerable scientific focus. Conventional methods in nutritional research—primarily depending on dietary questionnaires and standard clinical biomarkers—frequently do not adequately reflect the intricate and evolving metabolic reactions to diet. The rise of metabolomics, an expansive and systematic examination of low-molecular-weight metabolites in biological systems [1,2], has revolutionized nutritional science. It provides a robust method for comprehending the biochemical effects of food and nutrient consumption on health and illness [3].
Metabolomics involves the thorough, high-throughput examination of small-molecule metabolites (<1500 Da) found in biological samples like plasma, urine, saliva, feces, and tissues [4,5]. As the end product of gene expression, protein function, and environmental influences, the metabolome provides the most direct functional representation of the phenotype, serving as an optimal perspective for examining the biochemical impacts of diet. Commonly known as the “final stage of the omics cascade,” metabolomics records the body’s dynamic responses to nutrient consumption and facilitates a comprehensive understanding of how the human body interacts with food [6,7].
Nutritional metabolomics, also known as nutrimetabolomics, combines metabolomic profiling with dietary evaluations to explore the molecular effects of nutrients, bioactive substances, dietary habits, and functional foods on human health [8,9]. This method facilitates (i) the identification of dietary biomarkers that provide objective measurements of food consumption, (ii) the uncovering of metabolic profiles linked to disease risk or health conditions, and (iii) the delineation of personal metabolic reactions to food (i.e., metabotypes), opening doors for personalized nutrition [10,11].
Additionally, nutritional metabolomics aids in comprehending the biological mechanisms that drive diet-related illnesses, such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [12]. It further aids in assessing nutritional health, adherence to diets, and the lasting impacts of eating patterns on aging, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Even with its vast potential, incorporating metabolomics into nutritional science comes with difficulties. These involve the necessity for uniform protocols, enhanced data analysis techniques, and extensive food composition databases. Nonetheless, the integration of systems biology, high-throughput omics methods, and sophisticated bioinformatics is swiftly transforming the field of nutrition research.
In conclusion, metabolomics signifies crucial progress in nutritional science, providing a comprehensive perspective on the impact of food on human metabolism and well-being. As the domain progresses, its impacts are expected to influence the future of precise nutrition, food recommendations, and health policies.
Metabolomics technologies like Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry (MS) provide complementary benefits regarding sensitivity, breadth, and reproducibility and have been effectively utilized in various nutritional scenarios [13]. These encompass research on the effects of dietary modifications (e.g., Mediterranean diet, high-fat, or plant-based diets) on metabolism, the influence of metabolites from gut microbiota, and the metabolic changes caused by particular nutrients like polyphenols, amino acids, fatty acids, or vitamins [14].
NMR offers several advantages, including minimal sample preparation, non-destructive analysis, and high reproducibility, making it ideal for quantitative studies and longitudinal cohort analyses [15,16]. However, its relatively low sensitivity (typically in the micromolar range) limits the detection of low-abundance metabolites. In contrast, MS—particularly when coupled with chromatographic separation techniques such as Gas Chromatography (GC)-MS or Liquid Chromatography (LC)-MS—provides much higher sensitivity, and broader metabolite coverage, detecting hundreds to thousands of compounds across diverse chemical classes [17]. Nevertheless, MS workflows often involve complex sample preparation, and are susceptible to ion suppression and matrix effects. They also require external calibration for quantitation. [18]. In complex matrices, NMR is less affected by matrix interference, but detects a narrower range of metabolites compared to LC-MS-based methods [19,20]. Integrative approaches that combine NMR and MS are increasingly recommended, as they combine the strengths of both techniques—NMR’s reproducibility and structural elucidation power, and MS’s superior sensitivity and coverage — to achieve a more comprehensive and reliable metabolomic characterization. [21].
Despite these limitations, in nutritional metabolomics, NMR spectroscopy is notable for its reliability, consistency, low sample preparation needs, and noninvasive characteristics compared to other analytical platforms [22] as mentioned above. NMR-based metabolomics allows scientists to capture a comprehensive and untargeted view of the metabolome from various biological samples, such as urine, plasma, saliva, feces, and tissues [23]. Untargeted NMR is different from targeted metabolomics because it doesn’t make assumptions about what it is looking for [24]. Instead, the aim is to detect as many metabolites as possible, which provides a comprehensive snapshot of the metabolic status. Key strengths include minimal sample preparation, high reproducibility and the ability to quantify multiple metabolite classes simultaneously (amino acids, organic acids, sugars, lipids). Applications of untargeted NMR include the discovery of disease biomarkers (e.g., for cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple sclerosis), understanding host-microbiota interactions (via fecal or urine metabolites), monitoring treatment responses, and exploring metabolic phenotypes in population cohorts [25,26,27,28]. As tools and spectral libraries (e.g., HMDB) improve, identification and quantitation become increasingly reliable [29], though challenges remain in resolving overlapping peaks, low-abundance metabolites and integrating NMR data with mass spectrometry or other omics platforms for deeper metabolic coverage.
Moreover, NMR spectroscopy allows for absolute quantification of metabolites when using internal standards like trimethylsilylpropane sulfonic acid (DSS) and 2,2,3,3-tetradeutero-3-trimethylsilylpropionic acid (TSP) [30], and it facilitates the structural determination of unknown compounds thanks to its capability to detect various nuclei (e.g., 1H, 13C, 31P) [24]. These detailed profiles enable the observation of systemic effects triggered by particular nutrients, entire diets, or functional foods, as well as the discovery of new biomarkers related to dietary consumption, metabolic health, and nutrient-associated pathophysiological alterations. Furthermore, NMR data is often integrated with chemometrics and advanced multivariate statistical techniques, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), or Orthogonal PLS (OPLS), to uncover subtle metabolic variations linked to dietary interventions, patterns, or deficiencies [31]. This combination allows for achieving a great amount of information for the identification of potential biomarkers responsible for a precise metabolic pathway. These kinds of data are useful in different fields, ranging from food to biomedical fields, including health science [32,33].
This entry examines the uses of NMR-based metabolomics in nutrition research, covering its foundational principles, methodological benefits, application in dietary evaluations and intervention studies, significance in personalized nutrition, and present challenges. NMR-based metabolomics provides a non-invasive and quantitative perspective for assessing metabolic responses to diet, playing an essential role in advancing the future of nutritional science.

2. Biomarkers of Food Intake

Accurate and objective measurement of dietary intake is one of the most critical challenges in nutritional science. Traditional self-reported tools such as food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), 24-h recalls, and dietary diaries [34,35] are subject to several well-documented limitations, including recall bias, underreporting, overreporting, and socio-cultural influences [36]. These methodological shortcomings often result in misclassification of dietary exposures, thereby reducing the reliability and interpretability of associations between diet and health outcomes [37]. To overcome these limitations, the identification and validation of biomarkers of food intake (BFIs) has become a major focus in the field of nutritional metabolomics [38]. These biomarkers provide objective, quantifiable measures of the consumption of specific foods or dietary patterns and serve as essential tools for evaluating dietary adherence in intervention trials, epidemiological studies, and public health strategies [37]. In recent years, metabolomics has developed as a key technology for the identification of new dietary biomarkers [39] and through its use, a number of food intake biomarkers have emerged in the literature [37,40].

2.1. NMR in the Identification of BFIs

The measurement of BFIs in biofluids such as urine, plasma, serum, or saliva represents an objective tool for dietary assessment since provide a direct biochemical reflection of food consumption [41]. By identifying and quantifying metabolites or specific compounds derived from foods, BFIs enable researchers to establish a more reliable link between dietary exposure and health outcomes. Biofluids are particularly useful because they capture both acute and chronic dietary intake. For instance, short-lived metabolites of fruits, vegetables, coffee, or whole grains may be detected in urine within hours, while more stable biomarkers, such as specific fatty acids or carotenoids, may persist in plasma for days or weeks. Furthermore, BFIs can be integrated with multivariate statistical approaches and metabolomics workflows to uncover dietary patterns and validate adherence to nutritional interventions [42]. This objective assessment tool is particularly valuable in large epidemiological studies and in the context of personalized nutrition, where accurate dietary exposure data are essential to identify associations with metabolic health, chronic disease risk, and individual dietary responses. Overall, the use of BFIs in biofluids represents a paradigm shift in nutritional science, moving from subjective dietary assessment toward an evidence-based, molecularly informed understanding of diet–health interactions.
A growing number of studies have successfully employed NMR metabolomics to identify robust and food-specific biomarkers. McNamara and Brennan [37] in this work clearly describe the reason why this technique is suitable for the BFIs: it captures quantitative metabolite data in a robust fashion, in a non-destructive method, relatively fast and requires little sample preparation. NMR has been used to identify biomarkers of coffee, citrus fruit, wine, fish, and cruciferous vegetable consumption. For example, hippurate, trigonelline, and citrate have been consistently linked to coffee intake [43], while proline betaine reflects citrus consumption [44]; some notable examples are listed in Table 1. These biomarkers validate self-reported data and enable objective monitoring of food-specific intake within dietary patterns. Moreover, molecular biomarkers could detect biochemical changes associated with disease processes [45]. The key metabolites have become an important part for improving the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of diseases. Assessment of fluctuations on the levels of endogenous metabolites by advanced NMR spectroscopy technique combined with multivariate statistics has proved to be exquisitely valuable in human disease diagnosis, such as the metabolic syndrome, obesity, type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance [46].

2.2. NMR in Dietary Pattern Recognition

Diet plays a central role in shaping human health, influencing metabolic function, disease risk, and overall well-being. Traditionally, nutrition research has focused on single nutrients (e.g., protein, carbohydrates, vitamins) or individual food items (e.g., dairy, fruits, fish). However, such reductionist approaches often fail to capture the complex interactions between foods, nutrients, and human metabolism. For this reason, the concept of dietary patterns has emerged as a more holistic framework for studying nutrition [47].
Table 1. Applications of NMR in the Identification of BFIs.
Table 1. Applications of NMR in the Identification of BFIs.
FoodApplicationReference
Fruits and Vegetables
Citrus fruitProline and betaine detected in urine, and serum.Mitry [48]; Heinzmann, et al. [44].
TomatoesTrans-lycopene, cis-lycopene in plasma and serum.Chiva-Blanch, et al. [49].
Cruciferous vegetablesS-methyl cysteine sulfoxide, sulforaphane metabolites in urine.Edmands, et al. [50].
Carrotsα- and β-carotene in plasma, and serum.Arathi, et al. [51].
Whole Grains, Cereals and Legumes
Whole-grain wheat and ryeAlkylresorcinols in plasma, urine, and red blood cells.Landberg, et al. [52]; Chelladurai, et al. [53].
Oats and barleyAvenanthramides, β-glucan metabolites in plasma, and urine.Wang, et al. [54].
Lentils, Chickpeas, and Beans2-hydroxybutyric acid, lysine, trigonelline in serum, and urine.Madrid-Gambin, et al. [55].
Animal Products
Fish and seafoodTrimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), ω-3 fatty acids (EPA, DHA), in plasma, and urine.Lemos [56]; Hanhineva [57]; Lombardo, et al. [58]; Burton, et al. [59]; Xyda, et al. [60].
Red meatCarnitine, creatine, creatinine, anserine in urine, and plasma.Carrizo, et al. [61]; Pan, et al. [62];
Dairy productsOdd-chain fatty acids (C15:0, C17:0), trans-palmitoleic acid in serum, and urine. Trimigno, et al. [40]; Münger, et al. [63]; Correia, et al. [64].
Beverages
CoffeeTrigonelline, caffeine, paraxanthine, 3-hydroxyhippuric acid in urine, and plasma.Rådjursöga, et al. [65]; Rothwell, et al. [66].
TeaCatechins, theaflavins, 4-O-methylgallic acid in plasma, and urine.Rothwell, et al. [66]; Law, et al. [67]; Madrid-Gambin, et al. [68]; Daykin, et al. [69].
WineTartaric acid, ethyl glucuronide, resveratrol metabolites in urine, and plasma.van Dorsten, et al. [70]; Vázquez-Fresno, et al. [71]; Hong [72].
Dietary patterns describe the combination, frequency, and proportions of foods and beverages consumed in a habitual diet, reflecting overall lifestyle and cultural practices. Thus, beyond single food items, NMR-based metabolomics has shown potential in identifying metabolic signatures associated with dietary patterns. These signatures often include combinations of amino acids, organic acids, and microbial metabolites, reflecting the overall composition and quality of the diet. Several major dietary patterns have been extensively studied.

2.2.1. Mediterranean Diet

Mediterranean diet (MD) is characterized by high intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, olive oil, and moderate wine and limited red meat consumption. It is associated with improved cardiovascular health, reduced inflammation, and lower risk of chronic diseases. The NMR studies of biofluids such as urine and serum have identified several metabolites reflecting a high intake of foods such as fruits, vegetables, and legumes. In the first case, changes in urinary levels of 3-hydroxybutyrate, citric acid, and cis-aconitate, oleic acid, suberic acid, various amino acids and some microbial metabolites have been detected in individuals adhering to a MD [73,74]. Plasma metabolomics also shows improved lipid metabolism and reduced markers of oxidative stress. Moreover, it pointed out that citric acid emerged as the most significant metabolite differentiating “low” versus “high” adherence groups to the MD, with additional discriminatory metabolites including pyruvic acid, betaine, mannose, acetic acid, and myo-inositol [73]. Among these, citric acid showed strong correlations with fruit, fruit juice, and vegetable consumption, while being negatively associated with sweet foods and carbonated drinks. Its performance as a biomarker was further enhanced when evaluated as a ratio with pyruvic acid [73].

2.2.2. Vegetarian and Vegan Diet

Plant-based diets, including vegetarian and vegan dietary (VD) patterns, have gained significant attention in recent years due to their potential health benefits and sustainability implications. These diets are predominantly composed of fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and seeds, while varying in their exclusion of animal-derived products. Vegetarian diets typically exclude meat, poultry, and fish but may include dairy products and eggs, depending on the sub-type (lacto-ovo-vegetarian, lacto-vegetarian, ovo-vegetarian). Vegan diets are more restrictive, excluding all animal-derived products, including dairy, eggs, honey, and often processed foods containing animal additives [75]. Numerous studies have shown that plant-based diets are associated with a reduced risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and certain types of cancer. This is primarily attributed to their high content of dietary fiber, antioxidants, polyphenols, vitamins, and unsaturated fatty acids, alongside a lower intake of saturated fats and cholesterol [76,77].
NMR-based profiling has been instrumental in uncovering metabolic signatures of these VD patterns. Taken together, NMR metabolomics identifies in the urinary profile a consistent metabolic signature, which includes (i) lower branched-chain amino acid (BCAAs), methionine, taurine, creatine/creatinine, TMAO, and (ii) higher hippurate, glycine, citrate, Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), betaine, myo-inositol (Table 2) [78]. These biomarkers not only provide objective measures of adherence to plant-based diets but also reflect the metabolic and gut microbial adaptations that distinguish them from omnivorous dietary patterns [78].

2.2.3. Western Diet

The Western diet (WD) is typically characterized by a high consumption of red and processed meats, refined grains, saturated fats, added sugars, and low intake of dietary fiber, fruits, and vegetables [79]. It has been strongly associated with metabolic disorders such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [79,80]. Understanding the biochemical imprints of this dietary pattern is crucial for developing objective markers of adherence and linking dietary exposure with disease risk.
NMR-based metabolomics applied in serum and urine samples has consistently revealed distinctive features of the WD [81]. One of the most recurrent signatures is the elevation of BCAAs, including leucine, isoleucine, and valine. These metabolites are strongly associated with a high intake of animal protein and fat and have been repeatedly linked to the development of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome [82]. Parallel to this, increased levels of aromatic amino acids such as tyrosine and phenylalanine have been observed, reflecting the excessive consumption of meat and processed foods typical of WD habits [83]. The WD also induces a marked increase in lipid-associated metabolites, including signals from low-density lipoproteins (LDL), saturated fatty acid derivatives, and TMAO, a metabolite strongly linked to red meat intake and cardiovascular risk [84,85]. Conversely, metabolites typically associated with plant-based diets and gut microbial activity, such as hippurate and phenylacetylglutamine, are consistently reduced, reflecting the lower consumption of dietary fiber and reduced microbial diversity in the gut of WD consumers [86,87]. Furthermore, the concentration SCFAs, including acetate, butyrate, and propionate, is often decreased, consistent with the reduced fermentation of fiber in the colon. Since SCFAs are key mediators of host–microbiota interactions, their depletion further underscores the detrimental impact of the WD on metabolic health and gut homeostasis [88,89].
Altogether, these findings demonstrate how NMR metabolomics not only enables the identification of objective biomarkers of MD, and VD adherence but also provides mechanistic insights into the metabolic pathways altered by poor dietary habits, such as WD. This reinforces the value of metabolomics as a tool to monitor dietary patterns in epidemiological studies and to support preventive nutrition strategies, as demonstrated by the study from Prendiville, et al. [90], whosuccessfully developed a metabolomic-based multivariate model which was capable of classifying participants into one of four dietary patterns.

3. NMR Metabolomics and Gut Microbiota–Diet Interactions

The gut microbiota plays a central role in human health by modulating nutrient metabolism, producing bioactive compounds, and interacting with host metabolic pathways [91,92,93]. Among the many factors influencing the composition and functionality of gut microbial communities, diet is one of the strongest modulators.
The integration of metabolomics and microbiota sequencing data provides a comprehensive view of the functional interplay between microbial communities and their metabolic outputs. While microbiota sequencing (e.g., 16S rRNA or shotgun metagenomics) reveals the taxonomic composition and functional potential of microbial ecosystems, metabolomics captures the small molecules produced or modified by these microbes and the host. Combining these datasets enables researchers to link microbial taxa or genes to specific metabolites, uncover biomarkers, and elucidate mechanistic pathways underlying host-microbe interactions. Thus, the biochemical interplay between dietary components and microbial metabolites can be comprehensively studied through NMR-based metabolomics. This methodological strength makes NMR particularly suitable for studying microbiota–diet relationships, as it allows longitudinal monitoring of systemic and gut-derived metabolic changes in response to dietary interventions [94,95]. One of the clearest examples of this interaction is the relationship between dietary fiber intake and the production of microbial-derived SCFAs. Dietary fibers, being non-digestible carbohydrates, reach the colon intact, where they undergo fermentation by gut microorganisms, yielding SCFAs such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate [96,97]. These metabolites act as signaling molecules with broad physiological roles, influencing gut barrier integrity, immune modulation, and host energy metabolism. NMR-based metabolomics offers unique advantages for the direct detection and quantification of SCFAs, as this spectroscopy technique can identify acetate, propionate, butyrate, and other fermentation products such as lactate and succinate in fecal water extracts [98,99,100] (Figure 1). Beyond detection, the integration of metabolomic data with multivariate statistical approaches enables the identification of distinct SCFA profiles associated with high-fiber diets, for example those rich in whole grains, legumes, and fruits, compared to low-fiber dietary patterns [101,102].
Another area in which NMR metabolomics has provided valuable insights is the study of probiotic supplementation and its effects on both the fecal and plasma metabolome. Probiotics are defined by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) as “live microorganisms, which when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [103]. They can modulate the gut microbiota in ways that are reflected in metabolic outputs detectable by NMR [104,105]. For example, supplementation with strains such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium lactis has been associated with altered levels of organic acids, amino acids, and microbial fermentation products in feces [106]. Feces-derived metabolites such as caproate, valerate, butyrate, propionate, lactate, acetate, succinate, methanol, threonine and methionine significantly increased, and they are related to SCFA metabolism and TCA cycle metabolism. On the contrary potentially harmful metabolites such as p-cresol and ammonia, which are linked to proteolytic fermentation, decreased [107].
Systemic effects of probiotics can also be detected in plasma metabolomes, where NMR profiling has revealed modifications in lipid metabolism, branched-chain amino acids, and anti-inflammatory metabolites [105,108]. The integration of metabolomics with microbiota sequencing allows researchers to uncover microbial–metabolite interaction networks that respond to interventions like probiotics. These networks help explain how probiotics exert beneficial effects, moving beyond correlation to mechanistic interpretation. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that multi-strain probiotics not only enrich SCFA-producing bacteria but also modulate host metabolic markers relevant to glucose homeostasis, lipid profiles, and systemic inflammation, underscoring their potential in personalized nutrition strategies [109,110,111].
Altogether, these findings demonstrate how NMR-based metabolomics represents a powerful approach to unravel the biochemical consequences of dietary modulation of the gut microbiota, providing biomarkers of both dietary exposure and microbial functionality.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

NMR metabolomics represents a robust and reproducible platform for monitoring metabolic responses to dietary interventions. It provides objective biomarkers of dietary adherence, characterizes key pathway alterations, and enables stratification of individuals based on metabolic responsiveness. For Mediterranean diet, NMR highlights have identified several metabolites reflecting a high intake of foods such as fruits, vegetables, and legumes. In the first case, changes in urinary levels of 3-hydroxybutyrate, citric acid, and cis-aconitate, oleic acid, suberic acid, various amino acids and some microbial metabolites; for Vegan or Vegetarian diets, it documents shifts in amino acids, microbiome-derived metabolites, and favorable lipoprotein patterns, and for Western diet an elevation of BCAAs, including leucine, isoleucine, and valine, strongly associated with a high intake of animal protein and fat.
Looking ahead, integrating NMR metabolomics with complementary omics technologies such as microbiome sequencing, lipidomics, and transcriptomics will facilitate a systems-level understanding of diet–microbiome–host interactions and uncover causal mechanisms underlying metabolic phenotypes. Advances in computational approaches, including machine learning and network-based modeling, will further enhance the interpretation of complex multi-omics datasets and enable predictive modeling of dietary responses. Standardization of protocols for sample collection, data acquisition, and analysis remains essential to ensure reproducibility and comparability across studies. Ultimately, these developments will accelerate the translation of metabolomics into clinical and nutritional practice, supporting precision nutrition strategies and personalized dietary recommendations.
In this context, NMR spectroscopy holds great promise for advancing personalized nutrition and health monitoring. Its inherent reproducibility, quantitative accuracy, and non-destructive nature make it particularly suitable for longitudinal metabolic profiling, where consistent measurements over time are crucial for capturing dynamic physiological responses. By providing stable and comparable metabolic fingerprints, NMR enables the monitoring of individual metabolic trajectories in response to dietary interventions, lifestyle modifications, or disease progression. Furthermore, when integrated with other omics technologies—such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and microbiome analyses—NMR contributes to a comprehensive understanding of metabolic individuality. This integrative, multi-omics framework will be essential for developing tailored nutritional strategies and precision health applications, supporting the ongoing shift toward predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research MUR (RFO grant) funded to G. Picone and by the MUR-NRRP funding (MABEL project number SOE_0000116, funded to G. Picone).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

I thank the Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) of the University of Bologna for the use of their instruments and laboratories.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DSSTrimethylsilylpropane sulfonic acid
FFQsFood Frequency Questionnaires
GCGas Chromatography
LCLiquid Chromatography
LDLLow-Density Lipoproteins
MDMediterranean Diet
MSMass Spectrometry
NMRNuclear Magnetic Resonance
NAFLDNon-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
OPLSOrthogonal Partial Least Squares
PCAPrincipal Component Analysis
PLS-DAPartial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis
SCFAsShort Chain Fatty Acids
TMAOTrimethylamine-N-oxide
TSP2,2,3,3-tetradeutero-3-trimethylsilylpropionic acid
VDVegetarian and Vegan Diet
WDWester Diet

References

  1. Klassen, A.; Faccio, A.T.; Canuto, G.A.B.; da Cruz, P.L.R.; Ribeiro, H.C.; Tavares, M.F.M.; Sussulini, A. Metabolomics: Definitions and significance in systems biology. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nicholson, J.K.; Lindon, J.C. Metabonomics. Nature 2008, 455, 1054–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brouwer-Brolsma, E.M.; Brennan, L.; Drevon, C.A.; van Kranen, H.; Manach, C.; Dragsted, L.O.; Roche, H.M.; Andres-Lacueva, C.; Bakker, S.J.L.; Bouwman, J.; et al. Combining traditional dietary assessment methods with novel metabolomics techniques: Present efforts by the Food Biomarker Alliance. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hajnajafi, K.; Iqbal, M.A. Mass-spectrometry based metabolomics: An overview of workflows, strategies, data analysis and applications. Proteome Sci. 2025, 23, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nicholson, J.K.; Lindon, J.C.; Holmes, E. ‘Metabonomics’: Understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica 1999, 29, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gibbons, H.; O’Gorman, A.; Brennan, L. Metabolomics as a tool in nutritional research. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2015, 26, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guasch-Ferré, M.; Bhupathiraju, S.N.; Hu, F.B. Use of metabolomics in improving assessment of dietary intake. Clin. Chem. 2018, 64, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ulaszewska, M.M.; Weinert, C.H.; Trimigno, A.; Portmann, R.; Andres Lacueva, C.; Badertscher, R.; Brennan, L.; Brunius, C.; Bub, A.; Capozzi, F.; et al. Nutrimetabolomics: An Integrative Action for Metabolomic Analyses in Human Nutritional Studies. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, 1800384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jones, D.P.; Park, Y.; Ziegler, T.R. Nutritional metabolomics: Progress in addressing complexity in diet and health. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2012, 32, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Vimaleswaran, K.S.; Le Roy, C.I.; Claus, S.P. Foodomics for personalized nutrition: How far are we? Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 4, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, G.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Jia, W. Toward personalized nutrition: Comprehensive phytoprofiling and metabotyping. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 1547–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bervoets, L.; Adriaensens, P. Metabolomics in Nutritional Metabolism, Obesity, and Diabetes. In Nutritional Signaling Pathway Activities in Obesity and Diabetes; Cheng, Z., Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Catussi, B.L.C.; Lo Turco, E.G.; Pereira, D.M.; Teixeira, R.M.N.; Castro, B.P.; Massaia, I.F.D. Metabolomics: Unveiling biological matrices in precision nutrition and health. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2024, 64, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kortesniemi, M.; Noerman, S.; Kårlund, A.; Raita, J.; Meuronen, T.; Koistinen, V.; Landberg, R.; Hanhineva, K. Nutritional metabolomics: Recent developments and future needs. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2023, 77, 102400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Emwas, A.-H.; Roy, R.; McKay, R.T.; Tenori, L.; Saccenti, E.; Gowda, G.N.; Raftery, D.; Alahmari, F.; Jaremko, L.; Jaremko, M. NMR spectroscopy for metabolomics research. Metabolites 2019, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dona, A.C.; Jiménez, B.; Schäfer, H.; Humpfer, E.; Spraul, M.; Lewis, M.R.; Pearce, J.T.; Holmes, E.; Lindon, J.C.; Nicholson, J.K. Precision high-throughput proton NMR spectroscopy of human urine, serum, and plasma for large-scale metabolic phenotyping. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 9887–9894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wishart, D.S. Metabolomics for investigating physiological and pathophysiological processes. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1819–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Psychogios, N.; Hau, D.D.; Peng, J.; Guo, A.C.; Mandal, R.; Bouatra, S.; Sinelnikov, I.; Krishnamurthy, R.; Eisner, R.; Gautam, B. The human serum metabolome. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Moosmang, S.; Pitscheider, M.; Sturm, S.; Seger, C.; Tilg, H.; Halabalaki, M.; Stuppner, H. Metabolomic analysis—Addressing NMR and LC-MS related problems in human feces sample preparation. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 489, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meng, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, S.; Yang, L.; Yin, R. Review on analytical technologies and applications in metabolomics. Biocell 2024, 48, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Emwas, A.-H.M. The strengths and weaknesses of NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry with particular focus on metabolomics research. In Metabonomics: Methods and Protocols; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 161–193. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ciampa, A.; Danesi, F.; Picone, G. NMR-based metabolomics for a more holistic and sustainable research in food quality assessment: A narrative review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 13, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brennan, L. NMR-based metabolomics: From sample preparation to applications in nutrition research. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2014, 83, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Picone, G. The 1H HR-NMR Methods for the Evaluation of the Stability, Quality, Authenticity, and Shelf Life of Foods. Encyclopedia 2024, 5, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grasso, D.; Geminiani, M.; Galderisi, S.; Iacomelli, G.; Peruzzi, L.; Marzocchi, B.; Santucci, A.; Bernini, A. Untargeted NMR Metabolomics Reveals Alternative Biomarkers and Pathways in Alkaptonuria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, C.; Laghi, L.; Zhang, Z.; He, Y.; Wu, D.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.; Li, C.; Zou, L. First Steps toward the Giant Panda Metabolome Database: Untargeted Metabolomics of Feces, Urine, Serum, and Saliva by 1H NMR. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martias, C.; Baroukh, N.; Mavel, S.; Blasco, H.; Lefèvre, A.; Roch, L.; Montigny, F.; Gatien, J.; Schibler, L.; Dufour-Rainfray, D.; et al. Optimization of Sample Preparation for Metabolomics Exploration of Urine, Feces, Blood and Saliva in Humans Using Combined NMR and UHPLC-HRMS Platforms. Molecules 2021, 26, 4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tomášová, P.; Procházková, P.; Roubalová, R.; Dvořák, J.I.; Tlaskalová-Hogenová, H.; Čermáková, M.; Pelantová, H.; Šedivá, B.; Vecka, M.; Papežová, H. NMR-and MS-based untargeted metabolomic study of stool and serum samples from patients with anorexia nervosa. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 21, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ravanbakhsh, S.; Liu, P.; Bjordahl, T.C.; Mandal, R.; Grant, J.R.; Wilson, M.; Eisner, R.; Sinelnikov, I.; Hu, X.; Luchinat, C. Accurate, fully-automated NMR spectral profiling for metabolomics. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shimizu, A.; Ikeguchi, M.; Sugai, S. Appropriateness of DSS and TSP as internal references for 1H NMR studies of molten globule proteins in aqueous media. J. Biomol. NMR 1994, 4, 859–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Savorani, F.; Rasmussen, M.A.; Mikkelsen, M.S.; Engelsen, S.B. A primer to nutritional metabolomics by NMR spectroscopy and chemometrics. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 1131–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Corsaro, C.; Vasi, S.; Neri, F.; Mezzasalma, A.M.; Neri, G.; Fazio, E. NMR in metabolomics: From conventional statistics to machine learning and neural network approaches. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Picone, G.; Mengucci, C.; Capozzi, F. The NMR added value to the green foodomics perspective: Advances by machine learning to the holistic view on food and nutrition. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2022, 60, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bailey, R.L. Overview of dietary assessment methods for measuring intakes of foods, beverages, and dietary supplements in research studies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 70, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ravelli, M.N.; Schoeller, D.A. Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Burrows, T.L.; Ho, Y.Y.; Rollo, M.E.; Collins, C.E. Validity of Dietary Assessment Methods When Compared to the Method of Doubly Labeled Water: A Systematic Review in Adults. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McNamara, A.E.; Brennan, L. Potential of food intake biomarkers in nutrition research. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2020, 79, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rafiq, T.; Azab, S.M.; Teo, K.K.; Thabane, L.; Anand, S.S.; Morrison, K.M.; de Souza, R.J.; Britz-McKibbin, P. Nutritional Metabolomics and the Classification of Dietary Biomarker Candidates: A Critical Review. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 2333–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Collins, C.; McNamara, A.E.; Brennan, L. Role of metabolomics in identification of biomarkers related to food intake. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2019, 78, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Trimigno, A.; Münger, L.; Picone, G.; Freiburghaus, C.; Pimentel, G.; Vionnet, N.; Pralong, F.; Capozzi, F.; Badertscher, R.; Vergères, G. GC-MS Based Metabolomics and NMR Spectroscopy Investigation of Food Intake Biomarkers for Milk and Cheese in Serum of Healthy Humans. Metabolites 2018, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fuchsmann, P.; Tena Stern, M.; Münger, L.H.; Pimentel, G.; Burton, K.J.; Vionnet, N.; Vergères, G. Nutrivolatilomics of Urinary and Plasma Samples to Identify Candidate Biomarkers after Cheese, Milk, and Soy-Based Drink Intake in Healthy Humans. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 4019–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Castellano Escuder, P. Statistical Methods for Intake Prediction and Biological Significance Analysis in Nutrimetabolomic Studies. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  43. Friedrich, N.; Pietzner, M.; Cannet, C.; Thuesen, B.H.; Hansen, T.; Wallaschofski, H.; Grarup, N.; Skaaby, T.; Budde, K.; Pedersen, O. Urinary metabolomics reveals glycemic and coffee associated signatures of thyroid function in two population-based cohorts. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Heinzmann, S.S.; Brown, I.J.; Chan, Q.; Bictash, M.; Dumas, M.-E.; Kochhar, S.; Stamler, J.; Holmes, E.; Elliott, P.; Nicholson, J.K. Metabolic profiling strategy for discovery of nutritional biomarkers: Proline betaine as a marker of citrus consumption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, A.-H.; Sun, H.; Qiu, S.; Wang, X.-J. NMR-based metabolomics coupled with pattern recognition methods in biomarker discovery and disease diagnosis. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2013, 51, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hernandez-Baixauli, J.; Quesada-Vázquez, S.; Mariné-Casadó, R.; Gil Cardoso, K.; Caimari, A.; Del Bas, J.M.; Escoté, X.; Baselga-Escudero, L. Detection of early disease risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome: A new era with the NMR metabolomics assessment. Nutrients 2020, 12, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schulz, C.A.; Oluwagbemigun, K.; Nöthlings, U. Advances in dietary pattern analysis in nutritional epidemiology. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 4115–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mitry, P.A.R. New Biomarkers of Habitual Dietary Intake in Observational Studies. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chiva-Blanch, G.; Jiménez, C.; Pinyol, M.; Herreras, Z.; Catalán, M.; Martínez-Huélamo, M.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M.; Sala-Vila, A.; Cofán, M.; Gilabert, R. 5-CIS-, trans-and total lycopene plasma concentrations inversely relate to atherosclerotic plaque burden in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes subjects. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Edmands, W.M.; Beckonert, O.P.; Stella, C.; Campbell, A.; Lake, B.G.; Lindon, J.C.; Holmes, E.; Gooderham, N.J. Identification of human urinary biomarkers of cruciferous vegetable consumption by metabonomic profiling. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 4513–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arathi, B.P.; Sowmya, P.R.-R.; Vijay, K.; Baskaran, V.; Lakshminarayana, R. Biofunctionality of carotenoid metabolites: An insight into qualitative and quantitative analysis. In Metabolomics-Fundamentals and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; p. 19. [Google Scholar]
  52. Landberg, R.; Hanhineva, K.; Tuohy, K.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Biskup, I.; Llorach, R.; Yin, X.; Brennan, L.; Kolehmainen, M. Biomarkers of cereal food intake. Genes Nutr. 2019, 14, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chelladurai, P.K.; Pandey, A.; Swamy, C.T.; Govindarajan, N.; Ravichandran, L.; Anbu, K.; Shiddamallayya, N.; Singh Purewal, S. Rye Phenolics: Extraction, Identification, Structure and Health Benefits. In Rye: Processing, Nutritional Profile and Commercial Uses; Singh Purewal, S., Ed.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 117–156. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, P.; Chen, H.; Zhu, Y.; McBride, J.; Fu, J.; Sang, S. Oat avenanthramide-C (2c) is biotransformed by mice and the human microbiota into bioactive metabolites. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Madrid-Gambin, F.; Brunius, C.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Estruel-Amades, S.; Landberg, R.; Andres-Lacueva, C. Untargeted 1H NMR-based metabolomics analysis of urine and serum profiles after consumption of lentils, chickpeas, and beans: An extended meal study to discover dietary biomarkers of pulses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6997–7005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lemos, M.T.O. Urinary Biomarkers of Biofortified Beef in Healthy Women Explored by Untargeted Metabolomics; Universidade NOVA de Lisboa: Lisbon, Portugal, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hanhineva, K. Application of metabolomics to assess effects of controlled dietary interventions. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2015, 4, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lombardo, M.; Aulisa, G.; Marcon, D.; Rizzo, G.; Tarsisano, M.G.; Di Renzo, L.; Federici, M.; Caprio, M.; De Lorenzo, A. Association of urinary and plasma levels of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) with foods. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Burton, K.J.; Krüger, R.; Scherz, V.; Münger, L.H.; Picone, G.; Vionnet, N.; Bertelli, C.; Greub, G.; Capozzi, F.; Vergères, G. Trimethylamine-N-oxide postprandial response in plasma and urine is lower after fermented compared to non-fermented dairy consumption in healthy adults. Nutrients 2020, 12, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xyda, S.-E.; Vuckovic, I.; Petterson, X.-M.; Dasari, S.; Lalia, A.Z.; Parvizi, M.; Macura, S.I.; Lanza, I.R. Distinct influence of omega-3 fatty acids on the plasma metabolome of healthy older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2020, 75, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Carrizo, D.; Chevallier, O.P.; Woodside, J.V.; Brennan, S.F.; Cantwell, M.M.; Cuskelly, G.; Elliott, C.T. Untargeted metabolomic analysis of human serum samples associated with different levels of red meat consumption: A possible indicator of type 2 diabetes? Food Chem. 2017, 221, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pan, L.; Chen, L.; Lv, J.; Pang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pei, P.; Du, H.; Yang, L.; Millwood, I.Y.; Walters, R.G. Association of red meat consumption, metabolic markers, and risk of cardiovascular diseases. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 833271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Münger, L.H.; Trimigno, A.; Picone, G.; Freiburghaus, C.; Pimentel, G.; Burton, K.J.; Pralong, F.P.; Vionnet, N.; Capozzi, F.; Badertscher, R. Identification of urinary food intake biomarkers for milk, cheese, and soy-based drink by untargeted GC-MS and NMR in healthy humans. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 3321–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Correia, B.S.; Sandby, K.; Krarup, T.; Magkos, F.; Geiker, N.R.; Bertram, H.C. Changes in Plasma, Urine, and Fecal Metabolome after 16 Weeks of Consuming Dairy With Different Food Matrixes–A Randomized Controlled Trial. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2024, 68, 2300363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rådjursöga, M.; Karlsson, G.B.; Lindqvist, H.M.; Pedersen, A.; Persson, C.; Pinto, R.C.; Ellegård, L.; Winkvist, A. Metabolic profiles from two different breakfast meals characterized by 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Food Chem. 2017, 231, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rothwell, J.A.; Madrid-Gambin, F.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Andres-Lacueva, C.; Logue, C.; Gallagher, A.M.; Mack, C.; Kulling, S.E.; Gao, Q.; Praticò, G. Biomarkers of intake for coffee, tea, and sweetened beverages. Genes Nutr. 2018, 13, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Law, W.S.; Huang, P.Y.; Ong, E.S.; Ong, C.N.; Li, S.F.Y.; Pasikanti, K.K.; Chan, E.C.Y. Metabonomics investigation of human urine after ingestion of green tea with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and 1H NMR spectroscopy. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 2436–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Madrid-Gambin, F.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Vazquez-Fresno, R.; Vegas-Lozano, E.; Sanchez-Pla, A.; Misawa, K.; Hase, T.; Shimotoyodome, A.; Andres-Lacueva, C. Metabolic signature of a functional high-catechin tea after acute and sustained consumption in healthy volunteers through 1H NMR based metabolomics analysis of urine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 67, 3118–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Daykin, C.A.; Duynhoven, J.P.V.; Groenewegen, A.; Dachtler, M.; Amelsvoort, J.M.V.; Mulder, T.P. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic based studies of the metabolism of black tea polyphenols in humans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1428–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. van Dorsten, F.A.; Grün, C.H.; van Velzen, E.J.; Jacobs, D.M.; Draijer, R.; van Duynhoven, J.P. The metabolic fate of red wine and grape juice polyphenols in humans assessed by metabolomics. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Llorach, R.; Alcaro, F.; Rodríguez, M.Á.; Vinaixa, M.; Chiva-Blanch, G.; Estruch, R.; Correig, X.; Andrés-Lacueva, C. 1H-NMR-based metabolomic analysis of the effect of moderate wine consumption on subjects with cardiovascular risk factors. Electrophoresis 2012, 33, 2345–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hong, Y.S. NMR-based metabolomics in wine science. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2011, 49, S13–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Macias, S.; Kirma, J.; Yilmaz, A.; Moore, S.E.; McKinley, M.C.; McKeown, P.P.; Woodside, J.V.; Graham, S.F.; Green, B.D. Application of 1H-NMR Metabolomics for the Discovery of Blood Plasma Biomarkers of a Mediterranean Diet. Metabolites 2019, 9, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Llorach, R.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; Lupianez-Barbero, A.; Estruch, R.; Corella, D.; Fitó, M.; Arós, F.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Salas-Salvado, J. Metabolomic pattern analysis after mediterranean diet intervention in a nondiabetic population: A 1-and 3-year follow-up in the PREDIMED study. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Clarys, P.; Deliens, T.; Huybrechts, I.; Deriemaeker, P.; Vanaelst, B.; De Keyzer, W.; Hebbelinck, M.; Mullie, P. Comparison of Nutritional Quality of the Vegan, Vegetarian, Semi-Vegetarian, Pesco-Vegetarian and Omnivorous Diet. Nutrients 2014, 6, 1318–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Craig, W.J. Health effects of vegan diets2. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1627S–1633S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Satija, A.; Hu, F.B. Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 28, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xu, J.; Yang, S.; Cai, S.; Dong, J.; Li, X.; Chen, Z. Identification of biochemical changes in lactovegetarian urine using 1H NMR spectroscopy and pattern recognition. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 396, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cordain, L.; Eaton, S.B.; Sebastian, A.; Mann, N.; Lindeberg, S.; Watkins, B.A.; O’Keefe, J.H.; Brand-Miller, J. Origins and evolution of the Western diet: Health implications for the 21st century. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 341–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Beltrán-Velasco, A.I.; Redondo-Flórez, L.; Martín-Rodríguez, A.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Global impacts of western diet and its effects on metabolism and health: A narrative review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zabek, A.; Paslawski, R.; Paslawska, U.; Wojtowicz, W.; Drozdz, K.; Polakof, S.; Podhorska, M.; Dziegiel, P.; Mlynarz, P.; Szuba, A. The influence of different diets on metabolism and atherosclerosis processes—A porcine model: Blood serum, urine and tissues 1H NMR metabolomics targeted analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Newgard, C.B.; An, J.; Bain, J.R.; Muehlbauer, M.J.; Stevens, R.D.; Lien, L.F.; Haqq, A.M.; Shah, S.H.; Arlotto, M.; Slentz, C.A.; et al. A Branched-Chain Amino Acid-Related Metabolic Signature that Differentiates Obese and Lean Humans and Contributes to Insulin Resistance. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Guasch-Ferré, M.; Hruby, A.; Toledo, E.; Clish, C.B.; Martínez-González, M.A.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Hu, F.B. Metabolomics in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Lee, Y.; Lai, H.T.; de Oliveira Otto, M.C.; Lemaitre, R.N.; Fretts, A.; Sotoodehnia, N.; Budoff, M.; DiDonato, J.A. Dietary meat, trimethylamine N-oxide-related metabolites, and incident cardiovascular disease among older adults: The cardiovascular health study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2022, 42, e273–e288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Thomas, M.S.; Fernandez, M.L. Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), diet and cardiovascular disease. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2021, 23, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pallister, T.; Jackson, M.A.; Martin, T.C.; Zierer, J.; Jennings, A.; Mohney, R.P.; MacGregor, A.; Steves, C.J.; Cassidy, A.; Spector, T.D. Hippurate as a metabolomic marker of gut microbiome diversity: Modulation by diet and relationship to metabolic syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Brial, F.; Chilloux, J.; Nielsen, T.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Andrikopoulos, P.; Olanipekun, M.; Hoyles, L.; Djouadi, F.; Neves, A.L. Human and preclinical studies of the host–gut microbiome co-metabolite hippurate as a marker and mediator of metabolic health. Gut 2021, 70, 2105–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Canfora, E.E.; Meex, R.C.; Venema, K.; Blaak, E.E. Gut microbial metabolites in obesity, NAFLD and T2DM. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, X.; Shimizu, Y.; Kimura, I. Gut microbial metabolite short-chain fatty acids and obesity. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2017, 36, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Prendiville, O.; Walton, J.; Flynn, A.; Nugent, A.P.; McNulty, B.A.; Brennan, L. Classifying Individuals Into a Dietary Pattern Based on Metabolomic Data. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, 2001183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Vernocchi, P.; Del Chierico, F.; Putignani, L. Gut microbiota metabolism and interaction with food components. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, J.; Tan, Y.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, D.; Feng, W.; Peng, C. Functions of gut microbiota metabolites, current status and future perspectives. Aging Dis. 2022, 13, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jacobs, D.M.; Deltimple, N.; van Velzen, E.; van Dorsten, F.A.; Bingham, M.; Vaughan, E.E.; van Duynhoven, J. 1H NMR metabolite profiling of feces as a tool to assess the impact of nutrition on the human microbiome. NMR Biomed. 2008, 21, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Almanza-Aguilera, E.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; Llorach, R.; Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Carmona, F.; Sanchez, A.; Madrid-Gambin, F.; Estruch, R.; Corella, D. Microbial metabolites are associated with a high adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern using a 1H-NMR-based untargeted metabolomics approach. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 48, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Shinde, Y.; Deokar, G. Regulation of Gut Microbiota by Herbal Medicines. Curr. Drug Metab. 2024, 25, 110–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hossain, A.; Akhter, S.; Kabir, Y. Diet, Microbiome, and Human Health. In Health Benefits of Fermented Foods and Beverages; Dhaka University: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2015; pp. 212–245. [Google Scholar]
  98. Trimigno, A.; Łoniewska, B.; Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Kaczmarczyk, M.; Łoniewski, I.; Picone, G. The application of High-Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HR NMR) in metabolomic analyses of meconium and stool in newborns. A preliminary pilot study of MABEL project: Metabolomics approach for the assessment of Baby-Mother Enteric Microbiota Legacy. PharmaNutrition 2024, 27, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhu, C. 1H-NMR Spectroscopy to Investigate the Effects of Food on Animals and Humans Through Metabolomics. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  100. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Nie, X.; Zhu, C.; Luo, Q.; Laghi, L.; Picone, G. Metabolomic Analysis of Feces vs. Cecum Content in Animals: A Comparative Study Investigated by 1H-NMR. Metabolites 2025, 15, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vanden Bussche, J.; Marzorati, M.; Laukens, D.; Vanhaecke, L. Validated High Resolution Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach for Metabolomic Fingerprinting of the Human Gut Phenotype. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 10927–10934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Martinez, B.; Schwerdtfeger, L.A.; Richardson, A.; Tobet, S.A.; Henry, C.S. 1H-NMR Profiling of Short-Chain Fatty Acid Content from a Physiologically Accurate Gut-on-a-Chip Device. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 9987–9992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization. Probiotics in Food: Health and Nutritional Properties and Guidelines for Evaluation; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  104. Poulsen, K.O. The Use of Metabolomics for Studying the Effects of Pre-and Probiotics. Bachelor’s Thesis, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  105. Pedersen, S.M.M.; Nielsen, N.C.; Andersen, H.J.; Olsson, J.; Simrén, M.; Öhman, L.; Svensson, U.; Malmendal, A.; Bertram, H.C. The Serum Metabolite Response to Diet Intervention with Probiotic Acidified Milk in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients Is Indistinguishable from that of Non-Probiotic Acidified Milk by 1H NMR-Based Metabonomic Analysis. Nutrients 2010, 2, 1141–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Brasili, E.; Mengheri, E.; Tomassini, A.; Capuani, G.; Roselli, M.; Finamore, A.; Sciubba, F.; Marini, F.; Miccheli, A. Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 Induce Different Age-Related Metabolic Profiles Revealed by 1H-NMR Spectroscopy in Urine and Feces of Mice. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 1549–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wang, M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, H.; Ma, F.; Ma, C.W.; Lu, B.; Xie, Z. Metabonomic strategy for the detection of metabolic effects of probiotics combined with prebiotic supplementation in weaned rats. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 5042–5057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Di Cesare, F.; Calgaro, M.; Ghini, V.; Squarzanti, D.F.; De Prisco, A.; Visciglia, A.; Zanetta, P.; Rolla, R.; Savoia, P.; Amoruso, A. Exploring the Effects of Probiotic Treatment on Urinary and Serum Metabolic Profiles in Healthy Individuals. J. Proteome Res. 2023, 22, 3866–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Markowiak, P.; Śliżewska, K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Vulevic, J.; Juric, A.; Walton, G.E.; Claus, S.P.; Tzortzis, G.; Toward, R.E.; Gibson, G.R. Influence of galacto-oligosaccharide mixture (B-GOS) on gut microbiota, immune parameters and metabonomics in elderly persons. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gibson, G.R.; Hutkins, R.W.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) Consensus Statement on the Definition and Scope of Prebiotics; University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Lincoln, NE, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. NMR-based metabolomics offers unique advantages for the direct detection and quantification of SCFAs, as this spectroscopy technique can identify acetate, propionate, butyrate, for example, and other fermentation products such as lactate and succinate in fecal water extracts.
Figure 1. NMR-based metabolomics offers unique advantages for the direct detection and quantification of SCFAs, as this spectroscopy technique can identify acetate, propionate, butyrate, for example, and other fermentation products such as lactate and succinate in fecal water extracts.
Encyclopedia 05 00174 g001
Table 2. NMR-detected metabolites in the urinary profile distinguishing vegetarian and vegan diets from omnivorous diets.
Table 2. NMR-detected metabolites in the urinary profile distinguishing vegetarian and vegan diets from omnivorous diets.
MetaboliteTrend in Vegetarians/Vegans 1Biological/Dietary Source
BCAAs: leucine, isoleucine, valine↓ DecreasedMainly from animal protein (meat, dairy)
Methionine↓ DecreasedAnimal protein (meat, eggs, dairy)
Taurine↓ DecreasedAnimal tissue (meat, seafood)
Creatine/Creatinine↓ DecreasedAnimal muscle, absent in plants
TMAO↓ DecreasedProduced from choline/carnitine in animal foods
Glycine↑ IncreasedPlant proteins, conjugation of polyphenols
Citrate, Succinate, Malate↑ IncreasedOrganic acids from fruits/vegetables, TCA intermediates
Pyruvate, Lactate↑VariableAltered glycolytic flux, fiber fermentation
SCFAs: acetate, propionate, butyrate↑ IncreasedMicrobial fermentation of dietary fiber
Formate↑ IncreasedMicrobial fermentation by gut microbiota
Hippurate↑ IncreasedPolyphenol metabolism (fruits, vegetables, tea)
Phenylacetylglutamine↑ IncreasedMicrobial metabolism of aromatic polyphenols
Cinnamoylglycine↑ IncreasedPolyphenol-rich foods
Betaine↑ IncreasedWhole grains, beets, spinach
Myo-inositol↑ IncreasedLegumes, cereals, nuts
1 Key Insights: ↓ Animal-derived metabolites (BCAAs, taurine, creatine, TMAO) are consistent markers of reduced animal product intake. ↑ Plant and microbial-derived metabolites (hippurate, SCFAs, betaine, myo-inositol) reflect higher intake of fiber, legumes, fruits, vegetables, and polyphenols. These markers can be used as objective biomarkers of dietary adherence in nutritional epidemiology study.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Picone, G. The Application of NMR-Based Metabolomics in the Field of Nutritional Studies. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040174

AMA Style

Picone G. The Application of NMR-Based Metabolomics in the Field of Nutritional Studies. Encyclopedia. 2025; 5(4):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Picone, Gianfranco. 2025. "The Application of NMR-Based Metabolomics in the Field of Nutritional Studies" Encyclopedia 5, no. 4: 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040174

APA Style

Picone, G. (2025). The Application of NMR-Based Metabolomics in the Field of Nutritional Studies. Encyclopedia, 5(4), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040174

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop