Doctoral Supervision: A Best Practice Review
Definition
:1. Introduction
2. Selecting the Right Doctoral Student
3. Considering the Supervisor–Doctoral Student Relationship
4. Understanding the Power Dynamics between Supervisor and Doctoral Student
5. Integrating Doctoral Students into the Research Culture
6. Protecting the Mental Health of Doctoral Students
7. Supervising Doctoral Students
8. Training Supervisors
9. Mentoring Doctoral Students
10. Assisting Doctoral Students to Complete Their Studies
11. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension; Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Bernstein, B.; Evans, B.; Fyffe, J.; Halai, N.; Hall, F.; Jensen, H.-S.; Marsh, H.; Ortega, S. The continuing evolution of the research doctorate. In Globalization and Its Impacts on the Quality of PhD Education; Nerad, M., Evans, B., Eds.; Sense: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 5–30. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, A.L.; Bongaardt, R. The Future of Doctoral Research: Challenges and Opportunities, 1st ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, S.; Kiley, M.; Humphrey, R. A Handbook for Doctoral Supervisors, 2nd ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bogle, I. 100 Years of the PhD in the UK. In Proceedings of the Vitae Researcher Development International Conference, Birmingham, UK, 11–12 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Gunnarsson, R.; Jonasson, G.; Billhult, A. The experience of disagreement between students and supervisors in PhD education: A qualitative study. BMC Med. Educ. 2013, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Motshoane, P.; McKenna, S. Crossing the border from candidate to supervisor: The need for appropriate development. Teach. High. Educ. 2021, 26, 387–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huet, I.; Casanova, D. Exploring the professional development of doctoral supervisors through workplace learning: A literature review. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2020, 41, 774–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantor, G. The loneliness of the long-distance (PhD) researcher. Psychodyn. Pract. 2020, 26, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Kumar, V.; Taylor, S. A Guide to Online Supervision; UK Council for Graduate Education: Litchfield, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Pearson, M.; Kayrooz, C. Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 2004, 9, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastalich, W. Content and context in knowledge production: A critical review of doctoral supervision literature. Stud. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 1145–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, S. Good Supervisory Practice Framework; UK Council for Graduate Education (UKCGE): Lichfield, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Y.; Xu, Y. Unpacking the emotional dimension of doctoral supervision: supervisors’ emotions and emotion regulation strategies. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 2478–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gower, O. UK Research Supervision Survey–2021 Report; UK Council for Graduate Education (UKCGE): Lichfield, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Golde, C.; Dore, T. At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today’s Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education; Wisconsin University: Madison, WI, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Gatfield, T. An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2005, 27, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deuchar, R. Facilitator, director, or critical friend: Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teach. High. Educ. 2008, 13, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A. How are doctoral students supervised? concepts of doctoral research supervision. Stud. High. Educ. 2008, 33, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A. New approaches to doctoral supervision: Implications for educational development. Educ. Dev. 2010, 11, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
- Casey, C.; Harvey, O.; Taylor, J.; Knight, F.; Trenoweth, S. Exploring the wellbeing and resilience of postgraduate researchers. Furth. High. Educ. 2022, 46, 850–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedrich-Nel, H.; Mac Kinnon, J. The quality culture in doctoral education: Establishing the critical role of the doctoral supervisor. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2019, 56, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wellington, J.; Sikes, P. A doctorate in a tight compartment: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? Stud. High. Educ. 2006, 31, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, S. Managing Supervisory Loads by Centrally Limiting Student Numbers: An Investigation into Practice in Institutions in the UK; UK Council for Graduate Education (UKCGE): Lichfield, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, D.; Power, T.; Usher, K. Learning to be a doctoral supervisor: Experiences and views of nurse supervisors of higher degree research students. Clinal Nurs. 2021, 30, 1060–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Backhouse, J. Doctoral Education in South Africa: Models, Pedagogies and Student Experiences. Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Grant, B. Mapping the pleasures and risks of supervision. Discourse Stud. Cult. Politics Educ. 2003, 24, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polkinghorne, M.; Taylor, J.; Knight, F. Finding the Key to Successful Doctoral Supervision; Bournemouth University: Poole, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Firnhaber-Baker, J. Use your supervisory powers. In Research Professional News; Research Professional: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Cloete, N.; Mouton, J.; Sheppard, C. Doctoral Education in South Africa; African Minds: Cape Town, South Africa, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Parker-Jenkin, M. Mind the gap: Developing the roles, expectations and boundaries in the doctoral supervisor–supervisee relationship. Stud. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al Makhamreh, M.; Kutsyuruba, B. The role of trust in doctoral student–supervisor relationships in Canadian universities: The students’ lived experiences and perspectives. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 2021, 21, 124–138. [Google Scholar]
- Wisker, G.; Exley, K.; Antoniou, M.; Ridley, P. One-to-One with Students: Supervising, Coaching, Mentoring, and Personal Tutoring; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Bulat, A. The UCL Good Supervision Guide; University College London: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wisker, G.; Robinson, G.; Shacham, M. Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2007, 44, 301–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winchester-Seeto, T.; Homewood, J.; Thogersen, J.; Jacenyik-Trawoger, C.; Manathunga, C.; Reid, H.A. Doctoral supervision in a cross-cultural context: Issues affecting supervisors and candidates. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2013, 33, 610–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). Who’s Studying in HE? Personal Characteristics. Available online: https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/whos-in-he (accessed on 8 November 2022).
- Knowles, M. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species, 4th ed.; Gulf Publishing: Houston, TX, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Manathunga, C. Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions. Teach. High. Educ. 2007, 10, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.; Ngunjiri, F.; Hernandez, K. Collaborative Autoethnography; Left Coast Press: Walnut Creek, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lacey, C. The Socialization of Teachers; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Buirski, N. Is Mindfulness a Useful Next Trend in Doctoral Supervision? Aust. Univ. Rev. 2020, 62, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
- Andrew, K.; Richards, R.; Shiver, V. Managing the critical friendship: Using self-study in the doctoral supervision process. Stud. Teach. Educ. 2020, 16, 240–257. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, E.; Pugh, D. How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and their Supervisors, 5th ed.; Open University Press: Maidenhead, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Pinto, S. Encounters of cultures in doctoral supervision: Productive or problematic? Rev. Lusófona De Educ. 2020, 48, 151–167. [Google Scholar]
- Butler, B.; Diacopoulos, M. Re/learning student teaching supervision: A co/ethno-graphic self-study. Stud. Teach. Educ. Self-Study Teach. Educ. Pract. 2016, 12, 117–134. [Google Scholar]
- Parry, S. Disciplines and Doctorates; Springer Science and Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart, N.; Polkinghorne, M.; Devis-Rozental, C. Identifying Factors Influencing Higher Education Research Culture: An Embodied Relational Understanding Approach to PhD Supervision; Bournemouth University: Poole, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Manathunga, C.; Goozée, J. Challenging the dual assumption of the ‘always/already’ autonomous student and effective supervisor. Teach. High. Educ. 2007, 12, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, C.; Lee, A. Forged in fire: Narratives of trauma in PhD supervision pedagogy. South. Rev. Commun. Politics Cult. 1999, 32, 6–26. [Google Scholar]
- Muller, J. Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Educ. Work 2009, 22, 205–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonard, D.; Swap, W. Deep Smarts. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2004, 82, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, S. Keeping up with the Joneses. J. High. Educ. 2010, 81, 658–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitae. Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers; Vitae: Cambridge, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gower, O. How Healthy Are Our Postgraduate Research Cultures? UK Council for Graduate Education (UKCGE): Lichfield, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Sverdlik, A.; Hall, N.; McAlpine, L.; Hubbard, K. The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. Int. J. Dr. Stud. 2018, 13, 361–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beasy, K.; Emery, L.; Dyer, L.; Coleman, D.; Bywaters, D.; Garrad, T.; Crawford, J.; Swarts, K.; Jahangiri, S. Writing together to foster wellbeing: Doctoral writing groups as spaces of wellbeing. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2020, 39, 1091–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devenish, R.; Dyer, S.; Jefferson, T.; Lord, L.; van Leeuwen, S.; Fazakerly, V. Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2009, 28, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wenger, E. Communities of Practice; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Thornton, R.; Nardi, P. The dynamics of role acquisition. Am. J. Sociol. 1975, 68, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovitts, B. Leaving the Ivory Tower. The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study; Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner, S. “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. High. Educ. 2007, 54, 723–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A. How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Stud. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 878–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arnold, J. Learning from psychotherapy for postgraduate supervision. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 2009, 5, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, C. Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become, 2nd ed.; Merrill Publishing: Columbus, OH, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Siegel, D. The Mindful Therapist: A Clinician’s Guide to Mindsight and Neural Integration; Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Doloriert, C.; Sambrook, S.; Stewart, J. Power and emotion in doctoral supervision: Implications for HRD. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 2012, 36, 732–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manathunga, C. Supervisors watching supervisors. Aust. Univ. Rev. 2012, 54, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
- Burford, J. Not writing, and giving ‘zero-f**ks’ about it: Queer(y)ing doctoral ‘failure’. Discourse: Stud. Cult. Politics Educ. 2017, 38, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devos, C.; Boudrenghien, G.; Van der Linden, N.; Azzi, A.; Frenay, M.; Galand, B.; Klein, O. Doctoral students’ experiences leading to completion or attrition: A matter of sense, progress and distress. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2016, 32, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homer, S.; Solbrig, L.; Djama, D.; Bentley, A.; Kearns, S.; May, J. The researcher toolkit: A preventative, peer-support approach to postgraduate research student mental health. Stud. Grad. Postdr. Educ. 2020, 12, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creaton, J.; Handforth, R. Considering mental health and wellbeing in postgraduate research: A critical reflection. Stud. Grad. Postdr. Educ. 2021, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woolston, C. PhDs: The tortuous truth. Nature 2019, 575, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sverdlik, A.; Hall, N.; McAlpine, L. PhD imposter syndrome: Exploring antecedents, consequences, and implications for doctoral well-being. Int. J. Dr. Stud. 2020, 15, 737–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemer, S. Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2012, 31, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levecque, K.; Anseel, F.; De Beuckelaer, A.; Van der Heyden, J.; Gisle, L. Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Res. Policy 2017, 46, 868–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Virtanen, V.; Taina, L.; Pyhältö, K. What disengages doctoral students in the biological and environmental sciences from their doctoral studies? Stud. Contin. Educ. 2017, 39, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benmore, A. Boundary management in doctoral supervision: How supervisors negotiate roles and role transitions throughout the supervisory journey. Stud. High. Educ. 2016, 41, 1251–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazell, C.; Chapman, L.; Valeix, S.; Roberts, P.; Niven, J.; Berry, C. Understanding the mental health of doctoral researchers: A mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Syst. Rev. 2020, 9, 197–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manathunga, C.; Peseta, T.; McCormack, C. Supervisor development through creative approaches to writing. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 2010, 15, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metcalfe, J.; Day, E.; de Pury, J.; Dicks, A. Catalyst Fund: Supporting Mental Health and Wellbeing for Postgraduate Research Students; Vitae: Cambridge, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wisker, G. The Good Supervisor: Supervising Postgraduate and Undergraduate Research for Doctoral Theses and Dissertations, 2nd ed.; Red Globe Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Elliot, D.; Kobayashi, S. How can PhD supervisors play a role in bridging academic cultures? Teach. High. Educ. 2019, 24, 911–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotterall, S. Doctoral students writing: where’s the pedagogy? Teach. High. Educ. 2011, 16, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wisker, G.; Kiley, M. Professional learning: Lessons for supervision from doctoral examining. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 2014, 19, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gross, J. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychol. Inq. 2015, 26, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAlpine, L. Doctoral supervision: Not an individual but a collective institutional responsibility. Infanc. Y Aprendiz. 2013, 36, 259–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muraraneza, C.; Mtshali, N.; Bvumbwe, T. Challenges in post-graduate research supervision in nursing education: Integrative review. Nurse Educ. Today 2020, 89, 104376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moyo, M. An Analysis of the Implementation of the Teaching Development Grant in The South African Higher Education Sector. Ph.D. Thesis, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Halse, C. “Becoming a supervisor”: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Stud. High. Educ. 2011, 36, 557–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conway, C.; Palmer, C.; Edgar, S.; Hansen, E. Learning to teach graduate students: A self-study by students and a faculty member. Appl. Res. Music Educ. 2016, 34, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, K.; Fletcher, T. Navigating the personal challenges and sociopolitics of doctoral supervision. Stud. Teach. Educ. A J. Self-Study Teach. Educ. Pract. 2019, 15, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornell, B. PhD Students and their Careers–HEPI Policy Note 25; Higher Education Policy Institute: Oxford, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, J.; Sheean, L.; Bambling, M. Becoming a psychotherapist or counsellor: A survey of psychotherapy and counselling trainers. Psychother. Aust. 2009, 16, 70–80. [Google Scholar]
- Guerin, C.; Walker, R.; Aitchison, C.; Laming, M.; Padmanabhan, M.; James, B. Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities: Preparing research super-visors to teach writing. Acad. Lang. Learn. 2017, 11, A88–A103. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, G. Learning to supervise: Four journeys. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2015, 52, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manathunga, C. The development of research supervision: “Turning the light on a private space”. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 2005, 10, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connell, R.; Manathunga, C. On doctoral education: How to supervise a PhD, 1985-2011. Aust. Univ. Rev. 2012, 54, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- Sankey, K.; Machin, M. Employee participation in non-mandatory professional development–the role of core proactive motivation processes. Int J. Train. Dev. 2014, 18, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammond, J.; Ryland, K.; Tennant, M.; Boud, D. Building Research Supervision and Training across Australian Universities: Final Report; Australian Learning and Teaching Council: Sydney, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton, J.; Carson, S. Speaking of supervision: A dialogic approach to building higher degree research supervision capacity in the creative arts. Educ. Philos. Theory 2015, 47, 1348–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ibrahim, E.; McEwan, E.; Pitalbo, R. Doctoral supervision at the university of Sydney. Vestes 1980, 23, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
- McCormack, C.; Pamphilon, B. More than a confessional: Postmodern groupwork to support postgraduate supervisors’ professional development. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2004, 41, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brew, A.; Peseta, T. Changing postgraduate supervision practice: A programme to encourage learning through reflection and feedback. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2004, 41, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakeford, J. Original PhD Diaries; Missenden Centre: Great Missenden, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Epigeum. Supervising Doctoral Students, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Jara, M. Research-based doctoral supervision development programme: Learning through peer learning, reflection and case studies. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2020, 58, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Ocampo, G.; Castelló, M. Supervisors were first students: Analysing supervisors’ perceptions as doctoral students versus doctoral supervisors. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2018, 56, 711–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Archer, M. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Powles, M. The Role of Postgraduates in Australian Research. Report for the Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations; University of Melbourne: Melbourne, Australia, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- McCallin, A.; Nayar, S. Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teach. High. Educ. 2012, 17, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodhouse, J.; Wood, P. Creating dialogic spaces: Developing doctoral students’ critical writing skills through peer assessment. Stud. High. Educ. 2020, 47, 643–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, B.; Guccione, K. Was it worth it? a qualitative exploration into graduate perceptions of doctoral value. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2018, 37, 1124–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guccione, K.; Bryan, B. Worth doing but not worth having? The influence of personal aspirations and career expectations on the value of a doctorate. Stud. Grad. Postdr. Educ. 2022, 14, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Council for Doctoral Education. Tracking the Careers of Doctorate Holders; European University Association: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Polkinghorne, M.; Taylor, J.; Knight, F.; Stewart, N. Doctoral Supervision: A Best Practice Review. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, 46-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010004
Polkinghorne M, Taylor J, Knight F, Stewart N. Doctoral Supervision: A Best Practice Review. Encyclopedia. 2023; 3(1):46-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010004
Chicago/Turabian StylePolkinghorne, Martyn, Julia Taylor, Fiona Knight, and Natalie Stewart. 2023. "Doctoral Supervision: A Best Practice Review" Encyclopedia 3, no. 1: 46-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010004