Previous Issue
Volume 4, September
 
 

Kidney Dial., Volume 4, Issue 4 (December 2024) – 5 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 2077 KiB  
Review
IgA Nephropathy: What Is New in Treatment Options?
by Roberto Scarpioni and Teresa Valsania
Kidney Dial. 2024, 4(4), 223-245; https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial4040019 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 482
Abstract
IgA nephropathy (IgAN), first described in 1968, is one of the most common forms of glomerulonephritis and can progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 25 to 30 percent of patients within 20 to 25 years from the onset. It is histologically characterized [...] Read more.
IgA nephropathy (IgAN), first described in 1968, is one of the most common forms of glomerulonephritis and can progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 25 to 30 percent of patients within 20 to 25 years from the onset. It is histologically characterized by mesangial proliferation with prominent IgA deposition. The prognosis may be difficult to predict, but important risk factors for disease progression of kidney disease have been recognized: usually proteinuria above 0.75–1 g/day with or without hematuria, hypertension, high-risk histologic features (such as crescent formation, immune deposits in the capillary loops, mesangial deposits, glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and vascular disease), and a reduced Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR). In the absence of reliable specific biomarkers, current standards of care are addressed to decrease proteinuria, as a surrogate endpoint, and control blood pressure. For a long time, corticosteroids have been considered the only cure for proteinuric patients or those at risk of progression to ESKF; however, unfortunately, like other immunosuppressive agents, they are burdened with high collateral risks. Therefore, optimal treatment remains a challenge, even if, to date, clinicians have many more options available. Here, we will review the main therapies proposed, such as the stronghold of RAAS inhibition and the use of SGLT2 inhibitors; it is expected that ongoing clinical trials may find other therapies, apart from corticosteroids, that may help improve treatment, including both immunosuppressive monoclonal antibodies and other strategies. At the current time, there are no disease-specific therapies available for IgAN, because no largescale RCTs have demonstrated a reduction in mortality or in major adverse kidney or cardiovascular events with any therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 215 KiB  
Article
‘Optimal’ vs. ‘Suboptimal’ Haemodialysis Start with Central Venous Catheter—A Better Way to Assess a Vascular Access Service?
by Michael Corr, Agnes Masengu, Damian McGrogan and Jennifer Hanko
Kidney Dial. 2024, 4(4), 214-222; https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial4040018 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 530
Abstract
Background: Whether patients commence haemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC), or an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is used to audit the quality of a vascular access service. However, this crude metric of measurement can miss the increasing nuance and complexity of vascular [...] Read more.
Background: Whether patients commence haemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC), or an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is used to audit the quality of a vascular access service. However, this crude metric of measurement can miss the increasing nuance and complexity of vascular access planning. We aimed to understand whether commencing haemodialysis with a CVC represented an ‘optimal’ or ‘suboptimal’ outcome and how this could influence the assessment of a vascular access service. Methods: From a prospective clinical database, patients known to nephrology >90 days prior to initiating haemodialysis as first-ever renal replacement therapy (2011–2020) from a single centre were included. Results: A total of 158/254 patients started haemodialysis with a CVC, and 96 with arteriovenous fistula. For 91 patients, the CVC was deemed ‘optimal’ care due to factors such as unpredictable deterioration in renal function (n = 41) and inadequate veins for AVF creation (n = 24). For 67 patients, the CVC was ‘suboptimal’ due to factors such as no/late referral to access assessment (n = 25) and delays in the AVF creation pathway (n = 13). There was no difference in mean survival between the AVF and ‘suboptimal’ groups (2.53 vs. 2.21 years, p = 0.31). There was a survival difference between AVF versus CVC (2.53 vs. 1.97 years, p = 0.002) and ‘suboptimal’ versus ‘optimal’ CVC cohorts (2.21 vs. 1.40 years, p = 0.16). Conclusions: Understanding whether a CVC is ‘optimal’ or ‘suboptimal’ allows a more nuanced analysis of service provision. High mortality in the ‘optimal’ group suggests a frailer cohort where CVC is potentially the best care. Studying ‘suboptimal’ CVC starts helps identify practice and system issues preventing ‘optimal’ care. Full article
10 pages, 282 KiB  
Article
Costs Analysis of Kidney Transplantation in Spain: Differences Between Regional Health Services
by Lorena Agüero-Cobo, José Luis Cobo-Sánchez, Noelia Mancebo-Salas and Zulema Gancedo-González
Kidney Dial. 2024, 4(4), 203-213; https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial4040017 - 24 Oct 2024
Viewed by 857
Abstract
Background: For our society, chronic kidney disease is a major public health problem associated with high mortality, morbidity, reduced quality of life and a progressive increase in health costs. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the current cost of [...] Read more.
Background: For our society, chronic kidney disease is a major public health problem associated with high mortality, morbidity, reduced quality of life and a progressive increase in health costs. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the current cost of kidney transplantation (KT) and kidney–pancreas transplantation (KPT) among the different Regional Health Services (RHS) in Spain. Methods: A descriptive comparative study analyzing the public prices of RHS in Spain. The Official Gazette of the different communities was consulted, where the latest available order on this type of cost was sought. A descriptive analysis was made of the stipulated cost of the KT and KPT, for each degree of severity, RHS, year of publication and cost calculation method. Mean cost and standard deviation were calculated. Results: KT prices were found for 15 of the 18 RHS (83.33%). The average cost of KT in Spain was EUR 33,926.53 ± 6950.053 (range from EUR 23,140.37 in the Canary Islands to EUR 48,205.75 in Catalonia). For KPT, costs were found for 5 of the 18 RHS (27.8%). The mean cost of KPT was EUR 65,792.38 ± 11,273.12 (ranging from EUR 49,418.81 in Navarra to EUR 78,363.20 in Andalusia). Conclusions: There is a large variability in KT and KPT costs in Spain between RHS. Our study underlines the importance of adopting standardized and updated costing methods for KT and KPT. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 572 KiB  
Review
Exploring the Cardiorenal Benefits of SGLT2i: A Comprehensive Review
by Angelica Cersosimo, Andrea Drera, Marianna Adamo, Marco Metra and Enrico Vizzardi
Kidney Dial. 2024, 4(4), 184-202; https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial4040016 - 24 Oct 2024
Viewed by 535
Abstract
The history of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) is so long and started in 1835 when Petersen extracted a compound called phlorizin from apple tree bark. About fifty years later, von Mering discovered its glucosuric properties. In the 1980s, it was discovered that [...] Read more.
The history of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) is so long and started in 1835 when Petersen extracted a compound called phlorizin from apple tree bark. About fifty years later, von Mering discovered its glucosuric properties. In the 1980s, it was discovered that the glucosuria resulted from inhibition by phlorizin of glucose reabsorption by the renal tubules, which lowered blood glucose levels in diabetic rats. Nowadays, beyond their glucose-lowering effects, growing evidence suggests significant cardiorenal benefits associated with SGLT2i therapy. Indeed, several clinical trials, including landmark studies such as EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS Program, and DECLARE-TIMI 58, have demonstrated robust reductions in cardiovascular events, particularly heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality, among patients treated with SGLT2i. However, subsequent trials showed that SGLT2i benefits extend beyond the diabetic population, encompassing individuals with and without diabetes. Additionally, SGLT2i exhibit nephroprotective effects, manifesting as a slowing of the progression of chronic kidney disease and a reduction in the risk of end-stage kidney disease. The mechanisms underlying the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT2i are multifactorial and include improvements in glycemic control, reduction in arterial stiffness, modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, reduction of intraglomerular pression and promotion of natriuresis and diuresis through inhibition of SGLT2 in the luminal brush border of the first segments of the proximal kidney tubule. This narrative review aims to explore the cardiorenal outcomes of SGLT2i, encompassing their mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, safety profile, and implications for clinical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2369 KiB  
Article
Analysis of 2-Year Survival Outcomes of Japanese Older Populations on Hemodiafiltration: A Propensity Score-Matched Study Based on Insurance Claims Data
by Aziz Jamal, Akira Babazono, Ning Liu, Takako Fujita, Sung-a Kim and Yunfei Li
Kidney Dial. 2024, 4(4), 172-183; https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial4040015 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 633
Abstract
Despite the lack of evidence that suggests hemodiafiltration (HDF) offers a better survival outcome than standard hemodialysis (HD), the number of patients initiating HDF in Japan continues to rise. This study examined the temporal change in the number of HDF incidents, evaluated factors [...] Read more.
Despite the lack of evidence that suggests hemodiafiltration (HDF) offers a better survival outcome than standard hemodialysis (HD), the number of patients initiating HDF in Japan continues to rise. This study examined the temporal change in the number of HDF incidents, evaluated factors associated with all-cause mortality, and compared the mortality risk and survival time of patients on HDF with patients receiving standard HD in three sets of 2-year cohorts. The primary analyses included the insurance claims data of 460 HDF patients and propensity score-matched 903 standard HD patients who initiated dialysis therapy between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2018. Patient follow-up was censored at the time of death or the end of the 2-year study period. The number of patients who initiated HDF and the proportion of all-cause mortality cases were evaluated. Additionally, the survival outcomes between propensity score-matched HDF and standard HD patient groups were compared throughout cohorts. The number of HDF patients increased throughout cohorts, but the proportions of mortality cases across cohorts slowly decreased. Adjusting for all study covariates, we observed that HDF patients had a lower mortality risk and longer survival time than patients on standard HD. This study supports the notion that HDF lowers all-cause mortality compared with standard HD in an incident dialysis population in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop