# Modelling of Auxetic Woven Structures for Composite Reinforcement

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Analytical Model

_{l}and E

_{s}, and elasticity of warp yarn be E

_{p}.

_{l}is the elasticity of the weft yarn, $\delta {x}_{2}$ is the final extension in the float region. Now, the total extension would be the sum of extension in the plain weave and float part. The strain in the axial direction is total extension divided by the length of the fabric (in this case unit cell).

#### 2.1. Material

#### 2.2. Test Method

## 3. Computational Model

**Geometry:**The unit cell shown in Figure 8, is created by varying the float length along the warp and weft direction. Here, we use a combination of the plain weave along with the 4 up 1 down twill weave. Here, in each weft, 9 warp yarns are interlaced in plain weave and 10 warp yarns are interlaced in a 4/1 twill pattern, forming a foldable geometry. The twill weave forms the folded part with a long float length, which unfolds when extended in the axial direction. The unit cell created in Texgen, when joined, can produce full-scale fabric. This sort of portrayal is significantly more helpful for computational analysis of material properties.

**FEM:**The prepared unit cell is imported to Ansys Workbench as a Stereo Lithography file to FEM Modeler to generate the initial geometry. Then these data are transferred to the transient structural feature. Then the type of material is assigned to the yarns, that is, the weft yarns were kept elastic and warp yarns are kept non-elastic.

**Contact:**Initially the contact is created automatically on Ansys mechanical, analyzing the face-to-face detection shown in Figure 9 but the contacts are modified according to weave design. The contact method is changed to frictional with the coefficient of friction equal to 0.1. The formulation is set to Augmented Lagrange as the penetration matter in this model. The initial contact condition is analyzed through the contact tool and accordingly pinball radius is adjusted manually.

**Mesh generation:**After the contact point generation, the mesh was generated as shown in Figure 10. The mesh size taken here was medium for easy processing and accuracy and element size was 0.125 mm by default.

**Boundary conditions:**The boundary conditions are imposed, as shown in Figure 11, on the unit cell, keeping in mind that it is a repeating unit and not a full-scale fabric. The following kinematic boundary condition will be applied as in Equations (9) and (10).

_{1}, v

_{2}, v

_{3}, and v

_{4}are displacement vectors of points on the edges of 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and x

_{1}, x

_{2}, x

_{3}and x

_{4}are the absolute value of distances corresponding to displacement vectors v

_{1}, v

_{2}, v

_{3}, and v

_{4}. E stands for macroscopic strain tensor of the fabric [51,52,53,54].

**Simulation:**The left boundary was fixed along the x-direction and a directional displacement was applied along the right boundary, with the displacement rate of 2 mm/min. For the tensile test environment simulation, z and y directional displacements were constrained on both left and right boundaries. For the mechanical analysis of the model, elastic strain in the transverse direction in Figure 12.

## 4. Results and Discussion

#### 4.1. Experimental Results

#### 4.2. Analytical Model Results

#### 4.3. Computational Model Results

#### 4.4. Comparison of the Computational and Experimental Results

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Carneiro, V.H.; Meireles, J.; Puga, H. Auxetic materials—A review. Mater. Sci. Pol.
**2013**, 31, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lim, T.C. Mechanics of Metamaterials with Negative Parameters; Springer: Heidelberg/Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorodtsov, V.A.; Lisovenko, D.S. Auxetics among Materials with Cubic Anisotropy. Mech. Solids
**2020**, 55, 461–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lim, T.C. Auxetic Materials and Structures; Springer: Heidelberg/Berlin, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldstein, R.V.; Gorodtsov, V.A.; Lisovenko, D.S. Classification of cubic auxetics. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res.
**2013**, 250, 2038–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhou, S.; Li, Q. Microstructural design of connective base cells for functionally graded materials. Mater. Lett.
**2008**, 62, 4022–4024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Goldstein, R.V.; Gorodtsov, V.A.; Lisovenko, D.S.; Volkov, M.A. Auxetics among 6-constant tetragonal crystals. Lett. Mater.
**2015**, 5, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Goldstein, R.; Lisovenko, D.S.; Chentsov, A.; Lavrentyev, S.Y. Experimental study of auxetic behavior of re-entrant honeycomb with curvilinear elements. Lett. Mater.
**2017**, 7, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lakes, R. Foam Structures with a Negative Poisson’s Ratio. Science
**1987**, 235, 1038–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wojciechowski, K.W. Two-Dimensional Isotropic System with a Negative Poisson Ratio. Phys. Lett. A
**1989**, 137, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wojciechowski, K.W.; Tretiakov, K.V.; Kowalik, M. Elastic properties of dense solid phases of hard cyclic pentamers and heptamers in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. E
**2003**, 67, 036121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Goldstein, R.V.; Gorodtsov, V.A.; Lisovenko, D.S. Auxetic mechanics of crystalline materials. Mech. Solids
**2010**, 45, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Baughman, R.H.; Shacklette, J.M.; Zakhidov, A.; Stafström, S. Negative Poisson’s ratios as a common feature of cubic metals. Nature
**1998**, 392, 362–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Williams, J.; Lewis, J.L. Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis. J. Biomech. Eng.
**1982**, 104, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Frolich, L.M.; LaBarbera, M.; Stevens, W.P. Poisson’s ratio of a crossed fibre sheath: The skin of aquatic salamanders. J. Zool.
**1994**, 232, 231–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pikhitsa, P.V. Architecture of cylinders with implications for materials with negative Poisson ratio. Phys. Status Solidi B-Basic Solid State Phys.
**2007**, 244, 1004–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Z.; Hu, H. Auxetic materials and their potential applications in textiles. Text. Res. J.
**2014**, 84, 1600–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Love, A.E.H. A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. Nature
**1920**, 105, 511–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grima, J.N.; Gatt, R.; Zammit, V.; Williams, J.J.; Evans, K.E.; Alderson, A.; Walton, R.I. Natrolite: A zeolite with negative Poisson’s ratios. J. Appl. Phys.
**2007**, 101, 086102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bhullar, S.K. Three decades of auxetic polymers: A review. e-Polymers
**2015**, 15, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gunton, D.J.; Saunders, G.A. The Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of arsenic, antimony and bismuth. J. Mater. Sci.
**1972**, 7, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y. The anisotropic behavior of Poisson’s ratio, Young’s modulus, and shear modulus in hexagonal materials. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Res.
**1976**, 38, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yeganeh-Haeri, A.; Weidner, D.J.; Parise, J.B. Elasticity of α-cristobalite: A silicon dioxide with a negative poisson’s ratio. Science
**1992**, 257, 650–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, Q. Literature Review: Materials with Negative Poisson’s Ratios and Potential Applications to Aerospace and Defence; Defence Science and Technology Organisation: Canberra, Australia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Faisal, N.; Mcleod, A.; Booth, F.; Scott, L.; Duncan, S.; Droubi, G. Auxetic Structures for Marine Safety Applications (Rope, Sandwich Panel). Presented at the The Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology (IMarEST), Londin, UK, 28 March 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Uzun, M. Mechanical Properties of Auxetic and Conventional Polypropylene Random Short Fibre Reinforced Composites. Fibres Text. East. Eur.
**2012**, 5, 70–74. [Google Scholar] - Miller, W.; Ren, Z.; Smith, C.; Evans, K. A negative Poisson’s ratio carbon fibre composite using a negative Poisson’s ratio yarn reinforcement. Compos. Sci. Technol.
**2012**, 72, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, X.-T.; Wang, B.; Wen, Z.-H.; Ma, L. Fabrication and mechanical properties of CFRP composite three-dimensional double-arrow-head auxetic structures. Compos. Sci. Technol.
**2018**, 164, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pozniak, A.; Wojciechowski, K.W.; Grima, J.; Mizzi, L. Planar auxeticity from elliptic inclusions. Compos. Part B Eng.
**2016**, 94, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Narojczyk, J.W.; Wojciechowski, K.W. Poisson’s Ratio of the f.c.c. Hard Sphere Crystals with Periodically Stacked (001)-Nanolayers of Hard Spheres of Another Diameter. Materials
**2019**, 12, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Brańka, A.C.; Heyes, D.M.; Wojciechowski, K.W. Auxeticity of cubic materials under pressure. Phys. Status Solidi B
**2011**, 248, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, H. Auxetic Textile Materials—A review. J. Text. Eng. Fash. Technol.
**2017**, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Argatov, I.; Guinovart-Díaz, R.; Sabina, F. On local indentation and impact compliance of isotropic auxetic materials from the continuum mechanics viewpoint. Int. J. Eng. Sci.
**2012**, 54, 42–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, W.; Li, Z.-M.; Shi, W.; Xie, B.-H.; Yang, M.-B. On auxetic materials: Review. J. Mater. Sci.
**2004**, 39, 3269–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Evans, K.E.; Alderson, K.L. Auxetic materials: The positive side of being negative. Eng. Sci. Educ. J.
**2000**, 9, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alderson, K.L.; Alderson, A.; Smart, G.; Simkins, V.R.; Davies, P.J. Auxetic polypropylene fibres: Part 1—Manufacture and characterisation. Plast. Rubber Compos.
**2002**, 31, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lakes, R.S.; Witt, R. Making and Characterizing Negative Poisson’s Ratio Materials. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ.
**2002**, 30, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lorato, A.; Innocenti, P.; Scarpa, F.; Alderson, A.; Alderson, K.; Zied, K.; Ravirala, N.; Miller, W.; Smith, C.; Evans, K. The transverse elastic properties of chiral honeycombs. Compos. Sci. Technol.
**2010**, 70, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mir, M.; Ali, M.N.; Sami, J.; Ansari, U. Review of Mechanics and Applications of Auxetic Structures. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng.
**2014**, 2014, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Alderson, K.; Webber, R.; Mohammed, U.; Murphy, E.; Evans, K. An experimental study of ultrasonic attenuation in microporous polyethylene. Appl. Acoust.
**1997**, 50, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Darja, R.; Tatjana, R.; Alenka, P.Č. Auxetic textiles. Acta Chim. Slov.
**2013**, 60, 715–723. [Google Scholar] - Ng, W.S.; Hu, H. Woven fabrics made of auxetic plied yarns. Polymers
**2018**, 10, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Sloan, M.; Wright, J.; Evans, K. The helical auxetic yarn—A novel structure for composites and textiles; Geometry, manufacture and mechanical properties. Mech. Mater.
**2011**, 43, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Miller, W.; Hook, P.; Smith, C.W.; Wang, X.; Evans, K.E. The manufacture and characterisation of a novel, low modulus, negative Poisson’s ratio composite. Compos. Sci. Technol.
**2009**, 69, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, S.; Chalivendra, V.B.; Kim, Y.K. Impact behaviour of auxetic Kevlar
^{®}/epoxy composites. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khan, M.I.; Akram, J.; Umair, M.; Hamdani, S.T.A.; Shaker, K.; Nawab, Y.; Zeeshan, M. Development of composites, reinforced by novel 3D woven orthogonal fabrics with enhanced auxeticity. J. Ind. Text.
**2019**, 49, 676–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rabbi, F.; Chalivendra, V.; Kim, Y. Dynamic constitutive response of novel auxetic Kevlar
^{®}/epoxy composites. Compos. Struct.**2018**, 195, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y. Auxetic fibre–reinforced composites. Auxetic Text.
**2019**, 1, 285–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhou, L.; Jiang, L.; Hu, H. Auxetic composites made of 3D textile structure and polyurethane foam. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res.
**2016**, 253, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pan, N. Analysis of woven fabric strengths: Prediction of fabric strength under uniaxial and biaxial extensions. Compos. Sci. Technol.
**1996**, 56, 311–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Cao, H.; Zulifqar, A.; Hua, T.; Hu, H. Bi-stretch auxetic woven fabrics based on foldable geometry. Text. Res. J.
**2019**, 89, 2694–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grima, J.N.; Ravirala, N.; Galea, R.; Ellul, B.; Attard, D.; Gatt, R.; Alderson, A.; Rasburn, J.; Evans, K.E. Modelling and testing of a foldable macrostructure exhibiting auxetic behaviour. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res.
**2011**, 248, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Whitcomb, J.D.; Chapman, C.D.; Tang, X. Derivation of boundary conditions for micromechanics analyses of plain. J. Compos. Mater.
**2000**, 34, 724–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Carvelli, V.; Corazza, C.; Poggi, C. Mechanical modelling of monofilament technical textiles. Comput. Mater. Sci.
**2008**, 42, 679–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 3.**Free body diagram of loading. (T: Outward Tension, T

_{1}: Inward tension, F: Total frictional force, f.p.w: friction on plain weave, f.f: friction on float).

**Figure 4.**Couple formation in auxetic structure. (A, B, C: are nodal points of the zigzag pattern, X, Y: are axes representing warp and weft respectively).

**Figure 5.**Saw tooth model for plain weave. (A

_{1}, A

_{2}, B

_{1}, B

_{2}: are nodal points of the saw tooth model, H

_{1}, H

_{2}: are crimp amplitudes in X and Y axes, h

_{1}/2: crimp height from crossover point, F

_{1}, F

_{2}: Total force along the saw tooth axes, p

_{2}/2: half wavelength, V

_{1}, V

_{2}: inter yarn pressure).

S.No | Yarn Fineness | Tenacity at Breaking Extension (cN/tex) | Breaking Extension (%) |
---|---|---|---|

A | Cotton (30/2 tex) | 13.608 | 6.304 |

B | Cotton (20 tex) | 11.890 | 3.404 |

C | Core spun spandex 38 tex | 5.674 | 63.24 |

Parameters | Warp | Weft |
---|---|---|

Yarn spacing (mm) | 0.635 | 0.635 |

Crimp (%) | 8 | 7.1 |

Bending modulus (MPa) | 0.53 | 0.53 |

Coefficient of friction | 0.1 | 0.1 |

Direction | Plain Weave | Float |
---|---|---|

Weft (Axial strain %) | 1.1660 | 0.5253 |

Warp (Transverse strain %) | 0.5268 | 0.3909 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Shukla, S.; Behera, B.K.; Mishra, R.K.; Tichý, M.; Kolář, V.; Müller, M.
Modelling of Auxetic Woven Structures for Composite Reinforcement. *Textiles* **2022**, *2*, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010001

**AMA Style**

Shukla S, Behera BK, Mishra RK, Tichý M, Kolář V, Müller M.
Modelling of Auxetic Woven Structures for Composite Reinforcement. *Textiles*. 2022; 2(1):1-15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010001

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Shukla, Shivangi, Bijoya Kumar Behera, Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Martin Tichý, Viktor Kolář, and Miroslav Müller.
2022. "Modelling of Auxetic Woven Structures for Composite Reinforcement" *Textiles* 2, no. 1: 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010001