Next Article in Journal
Potential of Bacillus halotolerans in Mitigating Biotic and Abiotic Stresses: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae: A Natural Defense Against Oxidative Stress-Related Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Enhancing Horticultural Sustainability in the Face of Climate Change: Harnessing Biostimulants for Environmental Stress Alleviation in Crops

1
School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India
2
School of Agriculture, Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University, Dev Bhoomi Campus, Chakrata Road, Manduwala, Naugaon 248007, Uttarakhand, India
3
Department of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Rajasthan, NH-8, Bandarsindri, Kishangarh, Ajmer 305817, Rajasthan, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Stresses 2025, 5(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses5010023
Submission received: 10 January 2025 / Revised: 21 February 2025 / Accepted: 28 February 2025 / Published: 6 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant and Photoautotrophic Stresses)

Abstract

:
Climate change significantly impacts agriculture by increasing the frequency and intensity of environmental stresses, which can severely reduce agricultural yields. Adopting sustainable practices is crucial to mitigating these risks and enhancing crop resilience. Applying natural compounds and microorganisms as biostimulants has gained popularity as an eco-friendly approach to alleviating abiotic stress in agricultural plants. This study reviews the current research on applying biostimulants in horticulturally significant crops to boost their resistance to abiotic stressors such as salinity, drought, and high temperatures. It explores the mechanisms through which these stimulants offer protection, focusing on the roles of key bioactive substances in regulating physiological and molecular processes for stress adaptation. The study addresses biostimulant formulation, regulation, and application challenges. Future research directions are suggested to harness biostimulants’ potential fully, aiming to develop climate-resilient horticultural systems that follow sustainability principles. This comprehensive review underscores the use of biostimulants as a sustainable strategy to increase crop yields in the face of climate change, reducing reliance on synthetic agrochemicals.

1. Introduction

Climate change has become an essential element impacting crop yield and production, posing significant risks to the long-term stability of the agricultural system and the assurance of global food supply. Its effects on the agricultural sector are profound, bringing challenges such as extreme weather events, altered rainfall patterns, and rising temperatures, all threatening food availability and stability [1]. Droughts, heat waves, floods, temperature fluctuations, and soil salinity are major contributors to reduced crop productivity. Plants face numerous stressors, including biotic factors like bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and weeds, along with non-living challenges like extreme temperatures, drought, soil salinity, and waterlogging [2]. These stress conditions disrupt essential physiological and biochemical processes, diminishing crop performance and yield potential [3]. Countries such as India, where most agricultural land relies on rainfed systems, are vulnerable to these climate-induced challenges [4,5]. According to estimations, at the peak of the twenty-first century, worldwide temperatures rise by 1.5–2 degrees Celsius [6], further exacerbating these issues. Horticultural crops requiring specific environmental conditions are susceptible to these changes. For instance, rising temperatures can adversely affect plant development and stages of blooming and fruiting, eventually diminishing yields and impacting food security on a global scale [7]. A United Nations report projects that 9.7 billion people are predicted to inhabit the planet by 2050, significantly increasing the demand for food [8]. To meet this growing need, food production must rise by 60–70%, minimizing yield losses caused by environmental stresses [9]. One promising approach to address fruit quality and blossom count per plant and the challenges of food availability for both now and future generations is adopting integrated and sustainable crop production systems, especially regarding climate change. Researchers focus on developing adaptation and mitigation strategies to mitigate environmental degradation effects on horticultural crops. These efforts involve utilizing advanced technological interventions to restore ecological balance and ensure sustainable agricultural practices.
Biostimulants (BSts) are emerging as a promising approach to enhance crop performance in modern agricultural practices. Biostimulants are substances or combinations of naturally occurring organic compounds that promote plant growth, particularly under challenging environmental conditions [10]. As per the Fertilizer Amendment Order of 2021 (Inorganic, Organic, or Mixed), biostimulants are defined as materials or microbes or their combinations designed primarily to improve nutrient absorption, enhance growth, increase yield and quality, and help plants withstand stress. Importantly, these do not include plant growth enhancers or pesticides controlled by the 1968 Insecticide Act. Biostimulants come in various forms, including botanical extracts (such as seaweed extract, protein hydrolysates, vitamins, amino acids, anti-transpirants, non-microbiological products, humic acid, fulvic acid, and their products. Unlike fertilizers or manures, they are applied in small quantities, which sets them apart from these inputs [11]. Reducing the use of artificial fertilizers, pesticides, and heavy metals is essential for keeping farms healthy and sustainable. Excessive use of these chemicals can harm the environment, soil, and beneficial organisms. By enhancing the use of biostimulants and other natural alternatives, we can maintain the stability of agroecosystems while ensuring healthy plant growth and high productivity.
Decreasing dependence on artificial fertilizers, pesticides, heavy metals, and biostimulants is essential to preserving agroecosystems’ natural equilibrium. Additionally, through various processes, a range of bio-based compounds have demonstrated potential for increasing the growth of plants. These substances included gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [12], silicon [13,14], silicon oxide [15,16], silica [17], selenium [18], and melatonin [19,20]. These substances contribute to different plant production and health types, offering significant potential in sustainable agricultural practices. Biostimulants help plants cope with stress and increase resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors, promoting sustainable agricultural production across diverse agroecological regions worldwide [21]. Research has shown that they can increase yields by 17–19% in crops such as legumes, cereals, fruits, and vegetables [22]. Beyond boosting production, biostimulants have shown the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by minimizing the need for synthetic fertilizers. For instance, ref. [23] concluded that incorporating seaweed extract from Kappaphycus alvarezii into sugarcane farming significantly reduced emissions while decreasing reliance on chemical fertilizers. This highlights the importance of adopting eco-friendly agricultural practices that reduce the harmful effects of agrochemicals on the environment [24]. Plant-based biostimulants, in particular, offer a sustainable solution, as they can enhance crop yields while supporting environmentally responsible farming methods [25].

2. Methodology

This study focused on reviewing the existing literature, specifically, those studies addressing biostimulant applications and their role in enhancing horticultural sustainability amidst climate change. The review also explored utilizing biostimulants to reduce crop environmental stress. Keywords such as “Horticultural Sustainability”, “Climate Change Impacts”, “Biostimulants”, “Environmental Stress Alleviation”, “Crop Resilience”, and “Sustainable Agriculture” were employed to gather relevant studies. The study has used 160 different papers from various journals. Initially, the titles of these studies were assessed for relevance, followed by collecting detailed references, including author names, publication year, titles, and abstracts, for further evaluation. Multiple reliable databases, such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, and EBSCO host, were utilized for thorough coverage due to their widespread recognition and frequent use in academic research. Given the advancements in archival and retrieval technologies, the review methodology was tailored to stay current with these changes. Finally, abstracts from 175 studies were systematically reviewed to evaluate their suitability for the particular area of study.

3. Concepts and Types of Biostimulants

Biostimulants are organic substances applied to plants to improve the quality of crops, improve resistance to abiotic stresses, and boost nutrient efficiency, regardless of the plants’ nutrient content. They can be used in many ways, such as directly as a soil treatment, irrigation, or foliar application, improving crop development and quality [26]. Two primary categories may be used to broadly classify biostimulants according to their origin: microbial and non-microbial. Trichoderma species, rhizobacteria that promote plant development, and arbuscular mycorrhizae fungus are examples of microbial biostimulants. Conversely, materials like silicon, humic and fulvic acids, protein hydrolysates, phosphites, chitosan, and seaweed extract are examples of non-microbial biostimulants [27]. These biostimulant formulations are used directly in soil applications or as seed priming agents to promote synergistic plant growth, independently or in combination with micronutrients (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

3.1. Non-Microbial Biostimulants

3.1.1. Humic Substances (HS)

The aerobic microbial breakdown of organic compounds produces humic substances (HSs). These substances are typically divided into three categories depending on their soluble capacity at various pH levels: humin, fulvic acid (FA), and humic acid (HA). HSs are naturally found in organic soil material created by the breakdown of plant, animal, and microbial residues, along with the metabolic activities of soil microorganisms [28]. Studies have indicated that applying humic chemicals to plants can encourage the growth of their roots and overall plant development. HSs also help increase soil organic carbon, which can influence various processes, from gene expression related to plant adaptation to critical physio-biochemical events. Because of these benefits, HSs might make substantial contributions to developing sustainable agriculture methods [29].

3.1.2. Seaweed Extract (SWE)

Seaweed species, which include various types of multicellular macroalgae that are red, brown, and green, are a significant source of nutrients for fertilizers and organic matter. Seaweed extracts are frequently utilized as plant promoters or soil-conditioning agents in the agricultural sector. In a spray-on-the-leaves application, these extracts can boost plant growth, enhance their ability to cope with abiotic stresses, improve the activity of photosynthesis processes, and increase resistance to bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. As a result, they can significantly increase the quantity produced and productivity of various crops. Commercially available seaweed extracts (SWEs) comprise 30–40% polysaccharides. Red seaweed, including Kappaphycus alvarezii, Garciliaria edulis, and Acanthophora spicifera, as well as brown seaweed like Ascophyllum nodosum, Fucus spp., and Macrocystis pyrifera, are frequently applied in agricultural practices [30]. Seaweed extracts can change chemical and physical soil traits, enhancing nutrient content, promoting microbial growth, and improving water retention. These effects help alleviate nutrient deficiencies and biotic or abiotic stresses in plants, often through complex signal transduction pathways. SWEs are increasingly recognized for their role in sustainable agriculture, as they improve soil health, boost beneficial microorganisms, and enhance plant nutrient levels, all of which support plant metabolism and help crops better withstand environmental challenges [31].

3.1.3. Botanical Derivatives

Botanical derivatives are naturally occurring secondary metabolites, or phytochemicals, derived from plants and commonly used across various industries, including food, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and agriculture. While much botanical research has focused on their pesticide properties, there is growing interest in their potential as biostimulants. Unlike seaweed, the biostimulant effects of botanicals are less well understood, but they offer promise for promoting plant growth and resilience. One of the key advantages of using botanicals as biostimulants is that they are typically thought to be less detrimental to humans and the atmosphere than traditional chemical pesticides [32].

3.1.4. Protein Hydrolysates and Nitrogen-Containing Compounds

Protein hydrolysates (PHs) are combinations of peptides and amino acids created through animal or plants’ enzymatic or chemical breakdown of protein. These substances help stimulate plant defense mechanisms, promote growth, and improve various physiological processes, such as leaf efficiency of water consumption, gas exchange, and antioxidant activity [33]. PHs can be used through multiple methods, including prepping seeds, soil drenching, and foliar treatment [34,35]. They all support better root formation and increased proliferation of plants. However, one must remember that heavy application of PHs can lead to phytotoxicity and hinder plant growth [36]. Additionally, PHs possess hormone-like properties that help regulate carbon and nitrogen metabolism while boosting plants’ antioxidant defenses, particularly under stress conditions.

3.1.5. GABA

A four-carbon non-protein amino acid called gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is essential for plant communication and defense systems [37]. It assists plants to save moisture under drought conditions [38]. Ref. [39] studied the impact of GABA on sunflowers and discovered that higher concentrations increased sugar and chlorophyll synthesis. This was achieved by increasing the activity of antioxidant-related resistance enzymes significantly below drought and temperature-related stress levels.

3.1.6. Selenium

Selenium (Se) is a beneficial trace element, and when applied in low concentrations, it can enhance crop health and improve stress tolerance. For example, supplementing with organic selenium has significantly increased radish (Raphanus sativus) resistance to arsenic stress and toxicity by boosting superoxide dismutase activity [40].

3.1.7. Chitosan

Chitosan is a natural chitin derivative in insect, crustacean, fungal, and nematode eggshells [41]. It activates plant protective systems, including promoting the collection of phytoalexins, pathogenesis-related proteins, reactive oxygen species, and other plant defense chemicals. This increases plant resilience to stress and disease. Chitosan is utilized in agriculture as a biostimulant in several crops, including fruits, vegetables, cereals, and plantation crops, where it promotes growth and development while protecting against disease [42].

3.2. Microbial Biostimulants

Microbial biostimulants (MBSts) are essential in developing and maintaining different crops. Certain microorganisms in crops’ root zones, notably plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), serve as organic plant growth stimulants [43,44]. These soil microbes are crucial for transporting essential macro- and micronutrients into the rhizosphere, facilitating critical processes such as siderophore synthesis, nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, and disease suppression. Among the key groups of MBSts are Trichoderma species and various arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Other soil microorganisms, such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Paraburkholderia phytofirmans, have been identified as effective biostimulants that help plants cope with different abiotic stresses [45]. Endophytic MBSts, which reside inside plants, further increase a plant’s resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses by producing secondary metabolites that help neutralize reactive oxygen species, the culprits behind stress damage.

4. Sources of Biostimulants

Biostimulants come in a range of chemical forms and compositions. Beneficial bacteria, seaweed extracts, valuable fungus, and humic acid are all common constituents. Many biostimulant materials are derived from industrial and agricultural activity waste and byproducts. Ref. [46] identify potential sources of agricultural residue, industrial byproducts, urban solid trash, and aquaculture and livestock production waste. Plant and animal-based biostimulants are compounds produced from animal and plant tissues, frequently isolated from waste or byproducts. These biostimulants include dissolved proteins from plant and animal sources, such as secondary metabolites of plants, chitin, and chitosan [47]. These compounds are valued for their specific properties and functions that support plant growth and resilience. Protein hydrolysates contain peptides, oligopeptides, and amino acids created through chemical, thermal, or enzymatic hydrolysis. These hydrolysates are primarily sourced from both plant and animal byproducts. Plant-based protein sources often include byproducts from maize wet milling and other vegetable processing. However, significant byproducts produced by processing fish, poultry, and cattle, including fish scraps, animal skins, furs, and blood meal, are the source of animal-derived protein [48]. For instance, protein hydrolysates have been recovered from vegetable waste, including beetroot, cabbage, broccoli, and cauliflower [49].
Additionally, byproducts from leather production, such as animal skins, can also be processed into biostimulants [50], demonstrating how chicken feather waste could be converted into hydrolyzed products that are high in proteins, peptides, and amino acids to promote growth and development of plants. Secondary metabolites are substances plants form during their growth that have notable biological activity. These metabolites are valued for their wide range of effects and are used in various applications, including biostimulants. According to their chemical constituents, secondary metabolites are often classified as terpenoids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, alkaloids, and steroids [51]. Furthermore, to their many uses, these substances are crucial for plant development because they act as biological messengers and offer protection against environmental stresses [52]. A naturally occurring biopolymer, chitin is present mainly in the exoskeletons of animals such as insect species, molluscs, crustaceans, and arthropods. Deacetylation is a process that changes the structure of chitin and yields chitosan, a derivative of chitin. Chitin and chitosan are necessary for increasing agricultural yields and preserving the general quality of crops [53].
By altering their metabolic pathways, chitosan has been shown to boost photosynthesis in plants and increase their resistance to environmental stressors [54]. In the naturally occurring composting method, microbes decompose organic matter into more minor organic compounds, transforming it into nutrient-rich compost. This compost can serve as a valuable source of biostimulants, as it contains various beneficial compounds and microbes that can promote plant growth and overall health. For example, humic acid has been extracted from municipal solid waste, compost waste, and sewage sludge [55]. Additionally, vermicompost, a type of compost produced by worms, contains betaine. This compound is vital for preserving plant lipids and cell walls and fixing enzymatic and protein molecules [56,57]. Seaweed, mainly brown species like Fucus, Laminaria, and Ascophyllum, are widely recognized in agriculture for boosting plant growth. These seaweed-based biostimulants are usually available in liquid form or as soluble powders. The effectiveness of these products largely depends on the raw materials and the extraction methods used, such as acid or alkali treatment [32].
Additionally, to be rich in phenolic substances, seaweed extracts frequently include phytohormones that support plant growth and development. They also increase nutrient absorption, improve soil conditions, and help to chelate metals. Furthermore, seaweed supports plant water retention by producing hydrogels, which help maintain moisture in soil. Humic compounds are naturally occurring organic materials in soil, formed through the degradation of microorganisms, plants, animal materials, and soil microbial activity. Compared to fulvic acids, humic acids possess more carbon, a more significant molecular weight, and more polymerization, giving them a darker colour. Most humic farming materials come from non-renewable sources such as leonardite, peat, and soft coal. However, humic compounds derived from compost and vermicompost offer a more sustainable, renewable option. These natural compounds are frequently more successful in encouraging plant development, as they enhance soil properties, improve nutrient uptake by roots, and promote the development of lateral roots. The benefits of humic compounds are primarily due to their polyanionic nature, which increases soil Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) and improves overall soil health and plant growth [47,58,59]. The Different sources of biostimulants have been summarized in Table 1.

5. Biostimulants as Growth, Yield, and Quality Enhancers of Fruit Crops

Biostimulants, including seaweed extracts, humic acids, PGPR, protein hydrolysates, and oak wood extracts, have shown considerable promise in enhancing fruit quality, increasing yield, boosting antioxidant activity, and promoting overall plant health in various fruit crops. These substances help improve plant resilience, nutrient uptake, and stress tolerance, ultimately leading to better crop performance. This review provides an overview of how these biostimulants are applied in fruit production, highlighting their positive impacts on growth and fruit characteristics and their potential for improving agricultural sustainability [60,61,62,63,64,65,66] (Figure 2 and Table 2 and Table 3).

5.1. Strawberry

The use of biostimulants in growing strawberryxc (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) has been widely researched, yielding promising results. For instance, foliar treatment of humic acid and salicylic acid has enhanced leaves’ sugar content, acidity, vitamin C levels, and nutrient uptake (like the minerals calcium, magnesium, potassium, and phosphorous). While these treatments increased fruit yield, they were associated with decreased overall antioxidant capability without appreciably altering fruit brightness [67]. Applying seaweed extract (from Ascophyllum nodosum) and silicon dioxide four times via foliar spraying has significantly boosted fruit quality, particularly by increasing anthocyanin levels, total yield, and fruit count [68]. Weekly foliar sprays combining seaweed extracts (Ascophyllum nodosum), alfalfa, protein hydrolysates, and chitosan have been shown to enhance fruit texture, color, and nutritional quality, particularly in terms of phenolic compounds [69]. These treatments have also led to notable enhancement of vitamin C in fruit [70].

5.2. Pome and Stone Fruit

Using seven foliar applications of extract from seaweed enhanced the spread and severity of the red coloring in apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) [71]. Likewise, weekly foliar treatment of Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extract, alfalfa protein hydrolysates, and vitamins (B1, B2, and B6) after blooming enhanced red color and increased anthocyanin content in apple skin [72]. Although seven foliar applications of A. nodosum did not significantly impact yield, there was a noticeable reduction in sunburn and frost damage [73]. Dipping apple roots in suspension PGPR strains, such as Bacillus M3, Bacillus OSU-142, and Microbacterium FS01, increased shoot growth, productivity, and fruit weight [74]. In apricots (Prunus armeniaca L.), applying foliar sprays of humic and fulvic acids boosted the antioxidant activity of fruits at harvesting [75]. For bananas (Musa × paradisiaca L.), applying rhizobacteria promoted plant growth and development (Pseudomonas fluorescens) in a chitin-enriched medium, resulting in heavier fruits and overall yield, especially in rain-fed conditions [76].

5.3. Berries and Vine Crop

In blackberries (Rubus fruticosus L.), applications of PGPR (Pseudomonas fluorescens) to both roots and leaves have boosted sugar levels and increased flavonoid and phenol content [77]. In grapevines, applying humic acid as a foliage application has led to improvements in the weight of berry fruit clusters, an overall increase in the quantity of fruit, and higher TSS [78,79]. When protein hydrolysates from plants were applied to the soil, they boosted total polyphenol and anthocyanin content, resulting in a richer red color in berries and stimulating the production of petunidin [80]. Additionally, foliar sprays of Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extract increased anthocyanin levels within berries’ shells by harvest [81].
French oak wood extracts have been shown to modify the aroma profile of wines by enhancing wood-derived aromatic notes and increasing glycosidic non-volatile aroma precursors [82]. Other studies have reported that these extracts contributed to increased caramel, butterscotch, and vanilla flavours, along with higher polyphenol content and improved wine color [83,84]. Similarly, extracts from American oak wood have been found to alter the taste of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Additionally, foliar application of phenylalanine has enhanced most amino acid and stilbene levels, further boosting phenolic compound concentrations in wine [85].

5.4. Cherry, Papaya and Olive

Foliar applications of rhizobacteria (PGPR) like Bacillus subtilis OSU-142 and Pseudomonas putida BA-8 have enhanced the nutritional health of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) trees [86]. Additionally, applying seaweed extracts two to three times through foliar spraying helped reduce the occurrence of cracks in fruit [87]. Soil treatments with potassium silicate also contributed to improved firmness of fruit [88]. Applying humic acid to peach trees through foliar or soil treatments has enhanced fruit size and yield, soluble solids, skin anthocyanin levels, and NPK [89]. In plums, three foliar applications of seaweed extract (Ascophyllum nodosum) have boosted seed count, fruit weight, and overall yield without impacting fruit maturity or vegetative growth [90].
In papayas (Carica papaya L.), inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus mosseae and Entrophospora colombiana) enhanced the fruit’s storability and increased yield. However, there were no significant changes in the quality of fruit [91]. In olives (Olea europaea L.), foliar treatment of seaweed extract enhanced both the oil content and the rate of fruit maturation [92].
Table 3. Effect of biostimulants on fruit crops.
Table 3. Effect of biostimulants on fruit crops.
Fruit CropBiostimulantDosageMethod of ApplicationEffect of Biostimulants on Fruit CropReference
Kiwifruit
Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A.Chev.)
Humic acid4 mL per litreFoliar and drenchingIncreased the yield, TSS, and vitamin C content.[93]
Strawberry
(Fragaria ananassa Duch.)
Humic acid100 kg per haSoil applicationIncreased the carotenoids, chlorophyll a, and leaf area.[94]
Olive
(Olea europaea L.)
Arginine +humic acid5 mL per litreFoliarIncreased the total chlorophyll and fruit protein content.[95]
Grapevine
(Vitis vinifera L.)
Seaweed1 g/LFoliar applicationIncreased the yield, berries number, and anthocyanin content.[96]
Sour orange
(Citrus × aurantium L.)
Seaweed extracts4 g/LFertigationIncreased fruit quality and blossom count per plant.[97]
Mango
(Mangifera indica L.)
Seaweed extract4 mL/LFoliar applicationIncreased the nitrogen, potassium, iron and zinc content in the leaf.[98]
Grape
(Vitis vinifera L.)
Protein hydrolysate2 g/LFoliar applicationIncreased the amino acid and C: N ratio.[99]
Washington Navel Orange
Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck
Chitosan2 g/LFoliar applicationIncreased the leaf inflorescence and fruit set.[100]
Pomegranate
(Punica granatum L.)
ChitosanChitosan at 0.5%Foliar applicationImproved the fruit quality and reduced the fruit cracking.[101]
Cherry
(Prunus avium L.)
Chitosan coatingsAt 2%DippingReduced the pectin content and increase the firmness of the fruit.[102]
Grapevine
(Vitis vinifera L.)
Protein hydrolysates1.6 g per litreFoliar applicationIncreased the yield per vine and fruit colour and TSS.[83,103]

6. Biostimulants as Stress Alleviators in Fruit Crops

Fruit crops can suffer significantly from environmental problems such as excessive heat, drought, salt, poor soil quality, and nutrient shortages, occasionally resulting in production losses of up to 50% [104]. By strengthening internal defenses and promoting vital physiological and biochemical functions, biostimulants provide a safe, natural means of assisting plants in withstanding these pressures. For instance, they reduce oxidative stress by increasing antioxidants, which counteract dangerous reactive oxygen species (ROS) that build up in challenging environments and destroy cells [105]. Key enzymes like catalase and superoxide dismutase are activated by biostimulants like protein hydrolysates and seaweed extracts, encouraging the production of other protective substances like glutathione and ascorbate. By increasing the synthesis of osmoprotectants such as proline and enhancing soil moisture retention through humic acids, these compounds also help manage water, which makes them particularly helpful in salty or droughty environments [106].
Furthermore, plant hormones essential for growth and stress tolerance are primarily regulated by biostimulants (Table 4). They support stress-related hormones, including abscisic acid (ABA), which aids plants in preserving water during dry times. The plant’s capacity to respond to environmental stressors is further reinforced by seaweed extracts, which are high in cytokinins and protein hydrolysates that activate defense-related chemicals like salicylic acid [107]. Biostimulants benefit the plant and the soil by encouraging beneficial microbial activity, which enhances root growth and nutrient availability. Beneficial bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi are microorganisms that improve plant nutrient absorption, and humic materials improve soil structure, retain more water, and foster ideal growth conditions. Even in challenging situations, fruit harvests flourish thanks to these combined impacts [108].

7. Mechanisms of Biostimulants for Stress Tolerance: Molecular and Physiological

Numerous biotic stressors, such as insect and disease assaults, and abiotic stressors, like extreme temperatures, drought, and salt, are continuously present in crops (Figure 3). These challenges often require plants to adjust and reorganize their defense mechanisms and modify their metabolism to cope with these conditions [125]. Over time, plants have evolved a complex and flexible defense mechanism that responds to these environmental challenges, much like animals do [126]. Recent studies suggest that biostimulants can act as plant priming agents, helping to enhance and sensitize plant defenses, thereby improving their resistance to different abiotic stresses [127].
Plants encounter challenges from harmful microbes and tough abiotic elements that might adversely affect their growth and development, including lack of moisture, excessive salinity, excessive heat, and a shortage of vital nutrients—productivity [128]. In response to these stressors, plants initiate well-regulated defense responses. When faced with these challenges, plants activate various crucial processes, such as signaling pathways and defense gene activation. They also synthesize protective metabolites and undergo both physiological and structural changes. These adaptive mechanisms enable plants to survive and flourish in challenging environments [129].

7.1. Molecular Mechanisms

7.1.1. Gene Expression Modulation

Biostimulants are essential for increasing gene expression that helps plants respond to stress. For example, microbial biostimulants from Bacillus species have been found to turn on genes linked to resilience to drought. This leads to increased production of osmolytes that help plants preserve osmotic balance and adapt to stressful conditions like drought [130]. For example, in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.), Bacillus subtilis increases the expression of proline biosynthesis genes, improving drought tolerance [131]. Similarly, in strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens activates DREB (Dehydration-Responsive Element Binding) and LEA (Late Embryogenesis Abundant) genes, which boost water retention and cellular stability under water-deficit conditions. Additionally, in citrus (Citrus spp.), Bacillus strains stimulate the expression of genes involved in synthesizing heat shock proteins (HSPs) that protect cells from dehydration [132].

7.1.2. Antioxidant Defense Activation

Plants frequently release reactive oxygen species during a drought that may harm cells [133]. Thankfully, antioxidant enzymes such as Catalase (CAT), Peroxidase (POD), and Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are essential for neutralizing ROS, shielding plants from stress, and enhancing their capacity to withstand such circumstances [134]. Additionally, these antioxidants promote quicker recovery from dehydration and water deprivation, allowing plants to recover more quickly than those without these defenses [135]. In mangos (Mangifera indica L.), biostimulants derived from Bacillus species enhance antioxidant enzyme activity, reducing oxidative damage and improving drought resilience [136]. Likewise, in pomegranates (Punica granatum L.), surge expression of antioxidant genes after biostimulant application improves cell membrane stability under drought stress [137].

7.1.3. Phytohormone Regulation

Numerous plant hormones, including auxin, gibberellins (GA), jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and abscisic acid (ABA), are naturally produced by PGPRs and are essential for assisting plants in responding to stress. By altering the element’s nitrogen metabolic rate, boosting antioxidant synthesis, and encouraging the accumulation of glycine betaine, salicylic acid (SA), for instance, helps plants cope with difficult circumstances and reduces drought stress [138]. Bacillus species increase ABA levels in papaya (Carica papaya L.), enhancing stomatal regulation and water use efficiency [139]. Similarly, in apples (Malus domestica Borkh.), biostimulants promote the production of jasmonic acid (JA), strengthening plant defenses against environmental stressors. In blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), auxin and gibberellin production stimulated by microbial inoculants improves root development, supporting water uptake during dry periods [140].

7.1.4. Metabolic Reconfiguration

Targeted metabolomics studies reveal that biostimulant-treated plants exhibit altered profiles of metabolites such as amino acids, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds. These changes are associated with improved physiological responses under stress conditions, suggesting that biostimulants induce a metabolic shift that enhances plant resilience [141]. For example, in cherries (Prunus avium L.), microbial biostimulants boost the accumulation of phenolic compounds, which protect against oxidative damage during drought stress [142]. In kiwifruits (Actinidia deliciosa A.Chev.), increased flavonoid production following biostimulant application improves stress tolerance and fruit quality [143]. Additionally, in avocados (Persea Americana Mill.), the upregulation of amino acid metabolism helps maintain cellular homeostasis under water-limited conditions [144].

7.2. Physiological Mechanisms

7.2.1. Enhanced Nutrient Uptake

Biostimulants improve root architecture and function, leading to better nutrient absorption. This is particularly beneficial during periods of abiotic stress when nutrient availability may be limited [145]. Enhanced root growth facilitates greater access to water and nutrients for plant survival [146]. In pineapples (Ananas comosus L.), microbial inoculants enhance root biomass, improving phosphorus uptake under drought stress. In figs (Ficus carica), biostimulants increase root surface area, facilitating better potassium absorption to sustain physiological functions. Similarly, in guava (Psidium guajava L.), applying Bacillus biostimulants improves nitrogen uptake, supporting growth even under water-deficit conditions [147].

7.2.2. Osmotic Adjustment

Growth arrest is frequently brought on by drought stress, especially in shoots, which helps plants save energy and lower metabolic demands when water is scarce. This modification encourages the synthesis of essential metabolites, including osmoprotectants. These soluble, low molecular weight substances, including polyols, amino acids, betaines, and non-reducing sugars like proline, inositol, and glycine betaine, are essential for preserving osmotic equilibrium. Under stressful circumstances, they protect the plant from dehydration by stabilizing macromolecules and cellular membranes [148]. Additionally, to inhibit shoot development, stopping root development preserves the function of the root meristem, facilitating a speedier recovery and further root extension when the stress is removed [149]. Furthermore, the elongation of the primary root is prioritized by decreasing lateral root development, an adaptation approach that aids in the primary root’s ability to reach moisture stored in deeper soil layers [150]. In peaches (Prunus persica L.), biostimulant applications have been linked to increased proline accumulation, aiding in osmotic balance [151]. In watermelons (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.), glycine betaine synthesis is enhanced, reducing water loss and improving drought tolerance. Additionally, in passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims.), increased inositol levels contribute to osmotic regulation, ensuring sustained growth under limited water availability [152].

7.2.3. Stress Acclimation

Abiotic stressors like drought frequently cause physiological changes in plants, including slowed growth rates, decreased stomatal conductance, decreased transpiration and photosynthesis rates, and reduced leaf water content [153]. In response to extreme weather, plants trigger cellular and molecular processes similar to their defense systems against biotic stress, resulting in various physiological changes to help them survive. Significant alterations include swelling of the root zone to enhance mineral absorption, stomatal closure, and leaf rolling to minimize moisture through evaporation. Decreased leaf area is another effect of drought stress that can assist with rerouting resources from damaged or older leaves to promote the stem or new development [154]. In olives (Olea europaea L.), microbial biostimulants help regulate stomatal closure, preventing excessive water loss [155]. In pears (Pyrus communis L.), leaf rolling induced by biostimulant treatment reduces transpiration rates, enhancing drought tolerance. Similarly, in lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.), reduced leaf expansion helps optimize water use efficiency, ensuring sustained growth under drought conditions [156].

8. Estimation of Biostimulant Effects on Fruit Crops with the Help of Systematic Techniques

The impact of biostimulants on fruit crops requires a systematic approach, combining experimental methods and detailed analysis. Biostimulants, which include natural products like seaweed extracts and beneficial microbes, boost crop yield and increase quality, especially under stressful situations (Table 5). Here, we explore essential factors that influence their effects on fruit crops.

8.1. Enhancing Growth and Yield

Biostimulants like humic acid and seaweed extracts have demonstrated significant potential to boost plant development and crop production. For example, combining organic fertilizers with humic acid in strawberry cultivation led to a remarkable yield increase, reaching 262.42 g per plant [157]. Similarly, in apple farming, treatments with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and biogenic stimulants enhanced yields by 10.69% to 27.62% compared to plants without treatment [158].

8.2. Improving Fruit Quality

Biostimulants also play a vital role in improving fruit quality, such as increasing TSS and boosting nutritional value. In apples, using moringa leaf extract and seaweed extract significantly enhanced the characteristics, both molecular and physiological, of the fruit [159]. Similarly, applying organic liquid nutrients in strawberry cultivation yielded an impressive yield of 5418 kg per hectare, highlighting improvements in fruit quality and market appeal [160].

8.3. Mitigating Abiotic Stress

Biostimulants are instrumental in helping plants manage environmental stressors like salt and drought. They work by stimulating enzymes in plants and strengthening antioxidant defenses, which are essential for building resilience against such challenges [161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172]. Although biostimulants provide significant advantages, their performance can differ depending on the plant type and environmental factors. Further research is essential to refine application strategies tailored to specific fruit crops and growing conditions to maximize their potential.
Table 5. Effects of different biostimulants on growth and yield of various fruit crops.
Table 5. Effects of different biostimulants on growth and yield of various fruit crops.
Name of CropBiostimulantsMode of ApplicationEffects of BiostimulantsReferences
Strawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)
ChitosanFoliarYield increases 20%[162]
Grape
(Vitis vinifera L.)
ChitosanDippingIncreases the no. of canes and internodes[163]
Citrus
(Citrus spp.)
Sea weed extractSoil drenching and soil applicationEnhances the plant growth[118,164]
Loquat
Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.
AMFSoil applicationEnhances the dry mass of the leaf[165]
(Funneliformis mosseae)
Mango
(Mangifera indica L.)
Potassium silicateDrenchingIncreases the vegetative and reproductive growth[166]
Tangerine orange
(Citrus reticulata) Blanco
Humic acidSoil applicationIncreases the plant height, stem diameter[167]
Strawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)
PGPB B (Bacillus subtili)Root dippingIncreases the final yield[168]
Apple
(Malus domestica Borkh.)
Humic acidDrenchingIncreases the root length[169]
Pear
(Pyrus communis L.)
Amino acidFoliar applicationIncreases the shoot growth and yield[170]
Almond
Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A.Webb
Seaweed extractFoliar sprayIncreases the shoot length and shoot biomass[171]
Apricot
(Prunus armeniaca L.)
Humic acidFoliar sprayIncreases the vegetative growth and yield[172]

9. Biostimulants: Current Challenges, Future Prospects for Sustainable Agriculture

Biostimulants face several challenges that need to be addressed for more effective use. These include difficulties related to production, sourcing raw materials, understanding toxicity levels, determining optimal dosages, and clarifying how they work. While many biostimulants have shown promising results in experiments, the mechanisms behind their effectiveness remain unclear for many of them [173]. The production procedure is further related to obtaining raw materials, which are influenced by environmental factors. Additionally, the potential toxicity of biostimulants to plants has not been widely explored. To overcome these hurdles, advancements in techniques such as agronomics, metabolomics, and phenomics are necessary. These methods will help clarify how biostimulants work and guide the optimization of their dosages [174].
Biostimulants offer dual benefits by promoting plant growth and strengthening plants’ defenses against environmental stresses. Extracts from seaweed, humic substances, and other natural compounds have proven effective biostimulants for fruit crops, improving their nutritive value. These biostimulants have demonstrated no adverse impact on the development or growth of plants, making them a promising option for enhancing crop productivity. Additionally, the synthesis of green nanoparticles from seaweed extract has been investigated for its potential benefits [175]. When used alongside inorganic fertilizers, biostimulants can help reduce cultivation costs, and they are a crucial component of sustainable fruit production [98]. Concern over the overuse of dangerous chemicals like fertilizers and pesticide products in fruit production is rising in nations like India. The goal is to shift toward eco-friendly agricultural practices, reflecting the increasing emphasis on sustainability in horticultural crop production.
Biostimulants are innovative tools that can significantly enhance traditional farming practices. Their application in fruit orchards has shown promising results, such as improved plant growth, better fruit production, and increased environmental stability. Despite these benefits, widespread adoption of biostimulants for sustainable fruit farming still faces hurdles, particularly in navigating the legal processes required for large-scale use. However, the potential advantages of biostimulants could transform the fertilizer industry and help combat food insecurity in developing countries, positioning it as a crucial component in sustainable agriculture’s future. Moreover, ongoing developments in biostimulant technology, such as new product formulations, production advancements, and marketing and distribution improvements, could play a vital role in incorporating sustainable practices into modern farming. These efforts are critical to boosting plant resilience and adaptability to environmental challenges, making biostimulants an essential part of securing and optimizing global agricultural production, especially in the face of climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., G.M.S., S.S., G.S., N.S., U.S. and V.K.; methodology, S.S.; software and investigation, S.S., G.S., N.S., U.S. and V.K.; resources, M.S., G.M.S., S.S., G.S., N.S., U.S. and V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., G.M.S., S.S., G.S., N.S., U.S. and V.K.; writing—review and editing, M.S. and G.M.S.; visualization, S.S. and G.S.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Lovely Professional University for providing us with the necessary facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sible, C.N.; Seebauer, J.R.; Below, F.E. Plant biostimulants: A categorical review, their implications for row crop production, and relation to soil health indicators. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cirillo, V.; Molisso, D.; Aprile, A.M.; Maggio, A.; Rao, R. Systemin peptide application improves tomato salt stress tolerance and reveals common adaptation mechanisms to biotic and abiotic stress in plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 199, 104865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ranjan, A.; Sinha, R.; Bala, M.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Singh, A.K. Silicon-mediated abiotic and biotic stress mitigation in plants: Underlying mechanisms and potential for stress resilient agriculture. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 163, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Venkateswarlu, B.; Singh, A.K. Climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies in rainfed agriculture. In Climate Change Modelling, Planning and Policy for Agriculture; Singh, A.K., Dagar, J.C., Arunachalam, A.R.G., Shelat, K.N., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Datta, P.; Behera, B.; Rahut, D.B. Climate change and Indian agriculture: A systematic review of farmers’ perception, adaptation, and transformation. Environ. Chall. 2022, 8, 100543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhupenchandra, I.; Chongtham, S.K.; Devi, E.L.; Choudhary, A.K.; Salam, M.D.; Sahoo, M.R.; Bhutia, T.L.; Devi, S.H.; Thounaojam, A.S.; Behera, C.; et al. Role of biostimulants in mitigating the effects of climate change on crop performance. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 967665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hatfield, J.L.; Boote, K.J.; Kimball, B.A.; Ziska, L.H.; Izaurralde, R.C.; Ort, D.; Thomson, A.M.; Wolfe, D. Climate impacts on agriculture: Implications for crop production. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hussain, S.B.; Karagiannis, E.; Manzoor, M.; Ziogas, V. From Stress to success: Harnessing technological advancements to overcome climate change impacts in citriculture. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2023, 42, 345–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El-Boray, M.; Mostafa, M.; El-Galel, M.A.; Somaa, I. Effect of humic and fulvic acids with some nutrients at different time of application on yield and fruit quality of Anna apple trees. J. Plant Prod. 2015, 6, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Biostimulants in Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Du Jardin, P. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Balfagón, D.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Rambla, J.L.; Granell, A.; de Ollas, C.; Bassham, D.C.; Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I. γ-Aminobutyric acid plays a key role in plant acclimation to a combination of high light and heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 2026–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grusak, M.A.; Broadley, M.R.; White, P.J. Plant Macro-and micronutrient minerals. eLS 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Araújo, W.B.S.; Teixeira, G.C.M.; Prado, R.d.M.; Rocha, A.M.S. Silicon mitigates nutritional stress of nitrogen, phosphorus, and calcium deficiency in two forages plants. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, S.-A.; Li, M.-Z.; Wang, S.-M.; Yin, H.-J. Revisiting the role of plant transcription factors in the battle against abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Azmat, A.; Tanveer, Y.; Yasmin, H.; Hassan, M.N.; Shahzad, A.; Reddy, M.; Ahmad, A. Coactive role of zinc oxide nanoparticles and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for mitigation of synchronized effects of heat and drought stress in wheat plants. Chemosphere 2022, 297, 133982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ismail, L.M.; Soliman, M.I.; El-Aziz, M.H.A.; Abdel-Aziz, H.M.M. Impact of silica ions and nano silica on growth and productivity of pea plants under salinity stress. Plants 2022, 11, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. El-Badri, A.M.; Hashem, A.M.; Batool, M.; Sherif, A.; Nishawy, E.; Ayaad, M.; Hassan, H.M.; Elrewainy, I.M.; Wang, J.; Kuai, J.; et al. Comparative efficacy of bio-selenium nanoparticles and sodium selenite on morpho-physiochemical attributes under normal and salt stress conditions, besides selenium detoxification pathways in Brassica napus L. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pawar, V.A.; Laware, S.L. Seed priming a critical review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Biol. Sci. 2018, 5, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rajora, N.; Vats, S.; Raturi, G.; Thakral, V.; Kaur, S.; Rachappanavar, V.; Kumar, M.; Kesarwani, A.K.; Sonah, H.; Sharma, T.R.; et al. Seed priming with melatonin: A promising approach to combat abiotic stress in plants. Plant Stress 2022, 4, 100071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chojnacka, K. Innovative bio-products for agriculture. Open Chem. 2015, 12, 932–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, J.; Van Gerrewey, T.; Geelen, D. A meta-analysis of biostimulant yield effectiveness in field trials. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 836702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Singh, I.; Anand, K.V.; Solomon, S.; Shukla, S.K.; Rai, R.; Zodape, S.T.; Ghosh, A. Can we not mitigate climate change using seaweed based biostimulant: A case study with sugarcane cultivation in India. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 204, 992–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patil, H.J.; Solanki, M.K. Microbial Inoculant: Modern Era of Fertilizers and Pesticides. In Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 319–343. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zulfiqar, F.; Navarro, M.; Ashraf, M.; Akram, N.A.; Munné-Bosch, S. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: Advantages and limitations. Plant Sci. 2019, 289, 110270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhupenchandra, I.; Devi, S.H.; Basumatary, A.; Dutta, S.; Singh, L.K.; Kalita, P.; Bora, S.S.; Devi, R.S.; Saikia, A.; Sharma, P.; et al. Biostimulants: Potential and prospects in agriculture. Int. Res. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 2020, 21, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khurana, A.; Kumar, V. State of Biofertilizers and Organic Fertilizers in India; Centre for Science and Environment: New Delhi, India, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang, Y.; Yue, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lu, C.; Yin, Z.; Li, Y.; Ding, X. Plant Biostimulant as an Environmentally Friendly Alternative to Modern Agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 5107–5121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rathor, P.; Gorim, L.Y.; Thilakarathna, M.S. Plant physiological and molecular responses triggered by humic based biostimulants—A way forward to sustainable agriculture. Plant Soil 2023, 492, 31–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ali, O.; Ramsubhag, A.; Jayaraman, J. Biostimulant properties of seaweed extracts in plants: Implications towards sustainable crop production. Plants 2021, 10, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdullahi, U.A.; Khandaker, M.M.; Alias, N.; Shaari, E.M.; Alam, A.; Badaluddin, N.A.; Mohd, K.S. Seaweed effects on plant growth and environmental remediation: A review. J. Phytol. 2021, 13, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Battacharyya, D.; Babgohari, M.Z.; Rathor, P.; Prithiviraj, B. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rakkammal, K.; Maharajan, T.; Ceasar, S.A.; Ramesh, M. Biostimulants and their role in improving plant growth under drought and salinity. Cereal Res. Commun. 2023, 51, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Paul, K.; Sorrentino, M.; Lucini, L.; Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Bonini, P.; Reynaud, H.; Canaguier, R.; Trtílek, M.; Panzarová, K.; et al. Understanding the biostimulant action of vegetal-derived protein hydrolysates by high-throughput plant phenotyping and metabolomics: A case study on tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Agliassa, C.; Mannino, G.; Molino, D.; Cavalletto, S.; Contartese, V.; Bertea, C.M.; Secchi, F. A new protein hydrolysate-based biostimulant applied by fertigation promotes relief from drought stress in Capsicum annuum L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 1076–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nardi, S.; Pizzeghello, D.; Schiavon, M.; Ertani, A. Plant biostimulants: Physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 2016, 73, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Al-Khayri, J.M.; Abdel-Haleem, M.; Khedr, E.H. Harnessing GABA pathways to improve plant resilience against salt stress. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaspal, M.; Kanapaddalagamage, M.H.; Ramesh, S.A. Emerging roles of γ aminobutyric acid (GABA) gated channels in plant stress tolerance. Plants 2021, 10, 2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abdel Razik, E.S.; Alharbi, B.M.; Pirzadah, T.B.; Alnusairi, G.S.; Soliman, M.H.; Hakeem, K.R. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) mitigates drought and heat stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by regulating its physiological, biochemical and molecular pathways. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 505–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hu, L.; Wang, X.; Zou, Y.; Wu, D.; Gao, G.; Zhong, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hu, S.; Fan, H.; Zhang, B. Effects of inorganic and organic selenium intervention on resistance of radish to arsenic stress. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2022, 34, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chaudhary, S.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, R. Chitosan nanoemulsions as advanced edible coatings for fruits and vegetables: Composition, fabrication and developments in last decade. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chaudhary, S.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, R.; Kumar, S. Chitosan nanoemulsion: Gleam into the futuristic approach for preserving the quality of muscle foods. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 250, 126187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Backer, R.; Rokem, J.S.; Ilangumaran, G.; Lamont, J.; Praslickova, D.; Ricci, E.; Subramanian, S.; Smith, D.L. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vasseur-Coronado, M.; du Boulois, H.D.; Pertot, I.; Puopolo, G. Selection of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria sharing suitable features to be commercially developed as biostimulant products. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 245, 126672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Crovadore, J.; Cochard, B.; Grizard, D.; Chablais, R.; Baillarguet, M.; Comby, M.; Lefort, F. Draft genome sequence of Bacillus licheniformis strain UASWS1606, a plant biostimulant for agriculture. Genome Announc. 2020, 9, e00740-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. García-García, A.L.; García-Machado, F.J.; Borges, A.A.; Morales-Sierra, S.; Boto, A.; Jiménez-Arias, D. Pure Organic Active Compounds Against Abiotic Stress: A Biostimulant Overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 575829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Roy, D. Role of Biostimulants towards Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Food Sci. Rep. 2024, 5, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  48. Etemadian, Y.; Ghaemi, V.; Shaviklo, A.R.; Pourashouri, P.; Mahoonak, A.R.S.; Rafipour, F. Development of animal/plant-based protein hydrolysate and its application in food, feed and nutraceutical industries: State of the art. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 278, 123219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sedlar, T.; Cakarevic, J.; Tomic, J.; Popovic, L. Vegetable byproducts as new sources of functional proteins. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2021, 76, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mikula, K.; Konieczka, M.; Taf, R.; Skrzypczak, D.; Izydorczyk, G.; Moustakas, K.; Kulazynski, M.; Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Tannery waste as a renewable source of nitrogen for production of multicomponent fertilizers with biostimulating properties. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 8759–8777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, L.; Wen, K.-S.; Ruan, X.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Wei, F.; Wang, Q. Response of plant secondary metabolites to environmental factors. Molecules 2018, 23, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Noman, A.; Aqeel, M.; Qasim, M.; Haider, I.; Lou, Y. Plant-insect-microbe interaction: A love triangle between enemies in ecosystem. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 699, 134181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Chaski, C.; Polyzos, N.; Tzortzakis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A. Sustainable agriculture systems in vegetable production using chitin and chitosan as plant biostimulants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stanley-Raja, V.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Chanthini, K.M.; Sivanesh, H.; Ramasubramanian, R.; Karthi, S.; Shyam-Sundar, N.; Vasantha-Srinivasan, P.; Kalaivani, K. Biological activity of Chitosan inducing resistance efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa L.) after treatment with fungal based chitosan. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jindo, K.; Martim, S.A.; Navarro, E.C.; Pérez-Alfocea, F.; Hernandez, T.; Garcia, C.; Aguiar, N.O.; Canellas, L.P. Root growth promotion by humic acids from composted and non-composted urban organic wastes. Plant Soil 2011, 353, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huang, S.; Ma, Q.; Hou, Q.; Zuo, T.; Zhang, Z.; Ni, W. Identification and quantitative chemical analysis of betaines in different organic wastes and their bioconversion composts. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 328, 124857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Huang, S.; Zheng, X.; Luo, L.; Ni, Y.; Yao, L.; Ni, W. Biostimulants in bioconversion compost of organic waste: A novel booster in sustainable agriculture. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 319, 128704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Magnabosco, P.; Masi, A.; Shukla, R.; Bansal, V.; Carletti, P. Advancing the Impact of Plant Biostimulants to Sustainable Agriculture through Nanotechnologies. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2023, 10, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Drobek, M.; Frąc, M.; Cybulska, J. Plant Biostimulants: Importance of the quality and yield of horticultural crops and the improvement of plant tolerance to abiotic stress—A review. Agronomy 2019, 9, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Osman, H.S.; Rady, A.M.; Awadalla, A.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Hafez, E.M. Improving the Antioxidants System, Growth, and Sugar Beet Quality Subjected to Long-Term Osmotic Stress by Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Compost Tea. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2021, 16, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kisvarga, S.; Barna, D.; Kovács, S.; Csatári, G.; Tóth, I.O.; Fári, M.G.; Makleit, P.; Veres, S.; Alshaal, T.; Bákonyi, N. Fermented Alfalfa Brown Juice Significantly Stimulates the Growth and Development of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Plants. Agron. 2020, 10, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kaur, M.; Bhari, R.; Singh, R.S. Chicken feather waste-derived protein hydrolysate as a potential biostimulant for cultivation of mung beans. Biologia 2021, 76, 1807–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kok, A.D.X.; Wan Abdullah, W.M.A.N.; Tang, C.N.; Low, L.Y.; Yuswan, M.H.; Ong-Abdullah, J.; Tan, N.P.; Lai, K.S. Sodium lig-nosulfonate improves shoot growth of Oryza sativa via enhancement of photosynthetic activity and reduced accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Raguraj, S.; Kasim, S.; Jaafar, N.M.; Nazli, M.H.; Amali, R.K.A. A comparative study of tea waste derived humic-like substances with lignite-derived humic substances on chemical composition, spectroscopic properties and biological activity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 60631–60640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yoruklu, H.C.; Ozkaya, B.; Demir, A. Optimization of liquid fertilizer production from waste seaweed: A design of experiment based statistical approach. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. López-Corona, B.E.; Mondaca-Fernández, I.; Gortáres-Moroyoqui, P.; Meza-Montenegro, M.M.; Balderas-Cortés, J.d.J.; Ruiz-Alvarado, C.; Rueda-Puente, E.O. Ecofisiología y bioquímica de Salicornia bigelovii (Torr.) Por efecto de quitosano-aib bajo condiciones del desierto de Sonora. Polibot’ Anica 2020, 49, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aghaeifard, F.; Booshehri, A.A.; Shirani, H.; Tehranifar, A. Influence of humic acid and salicylic acid on fruit quality, yield, and nutrient uptake in strawberry. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 211, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rana, V.S.; Lingwal, K.; Sharma, S.; Rana, N.; Pawar, R.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, U. Enhancement in growth, yield and nutritive characteristics of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) by the application of biostimulant: Seaweed extract. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Soppelsa, S.; Kelderer, M.; Casera, C.; Bassi, M.; Robatscher, P.; Matteazzi, A.; Andreotti, C. Foliar applications of biostimulants promote growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry plants grown under nutrient limitation. Agronomy 2019, 9, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Flores-Félix, J.D.; Silva, L.R.; Rivera, L.P.; Marcos-García, M.; García-Fraile, P.; Martínez-Molina, E.; Mateos, P.F.; Velázquez, E.; Andrade, P.; Rivas, R. Plants probiotics as a tool to produce highly functional fruits: The case of Phyllobacterium and Vitamin C in strawberries. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Malaguti, D.; Matassi, G.; Guidi, B. Seaweed extract effect on apple tree growth and fruit color. J. Plant Nutr. 2002, 25, 1333–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Soppelsa, S.; Kelderer, M.; Casera, C.; Bassi, M.; Robatscher, P.; Andreotti, C. Use of biostimulants for organic apple production: Effects on tree growth, yield, and fruit quality at harvest and during storage. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Gu, A.; Xue, X.; Chen, R. Effects of Seaweed-Extract-Based Organic Fertilizers on the Levels of Mineral Elements, Sugar–Acid Components and Hormones in Fuji Apples. Agronomy 2023, 13, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Karlidag, H.; Esitken, A.; Yildirim, E.; Donmez, M.F.; Turan, M. Effects of root inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth, and nutrient uptake in apple. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 114, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Al-Saif, A.M.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Awad, R.M.; Mosa, W.F. Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) performance under foliar application of humic acid, brassinosteroids, and seaweed extract. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kavino, M.; Harish, S.; Kumar, N.; Saravanakumar, D.; Damodaran, T.; Soorianathasundaram, K. Impact of grafting on product quality of fruit vegetables. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 127, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Garza-Alonso, C.A.; Olivares-Sáenz, E.; González-Morales, S.; la Fuente, M.C.-D.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; González-Fuentes, J.A.; Tortella, G.; Valdés-Caballero, M.V.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Strawberry biostimulation: From mechanisms of action to plant growth and fruit quality. Plants 2022, 11, 3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Popescu, G.; Popescu, M. Humic acids improve fruit yield and quality in grapevines. J. Appl. Bot. 2018, 92, 321–328. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ferrara, G.; Brunetti, G. Foliar applications of humic acids in grapevine to improve production and quality. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Parrado, J.; Escobar, I.; Benítez, C.; Friaza, V.; García-Martínez, A. Chemical characterization of humic acids and their effect on red wine quality. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 1012–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Frioni, T.; Tombesi, S.; Silvestroni, O.; Lanari, V.; Bellincontro, A.; Palliotti, A. Seaweed extracts in viticulture: Effects on red grape quality and anthocyanins content. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 3744–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Malhotra, S.K. Horticultural crops and climate change: A review. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 87, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Boselli, M.; Bahouaoui, M.; Lachhab, N.; Sanzani, S.; Ferrara, G.; Ippolito, A. Protein hydrolysates effects on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Corvina) performance and water stress tolerance. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 258, 108784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Monteiro, E.; Gonçalves, B.; Cortez, I.; Castro, I. The role of biostimulants as alleviators of biotic and abiotic stresses in grapevine: A review. Plants 2022, 11, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Garde-Cerdán, T.; Rubio-Bretón, P.; Arias-Gil, M.; Martínez-Cutillas, A. Phenylalanine sprays increase wine phenolic compounds and aroma precursors. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Esitken, A.; Pirlak, L.; Turan, M.; Sahin, F. Effects of floral and foliar application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth and nutrition of sweet cherry. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 110, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vercammen, J.; Soppelsa, S.; Robatscher, P.; Andreotti, C. Effect of seaweed extract on fruit quality of sweet cherry. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 45, 153–160. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kaiser, N.; Matthys, C.; Andreotti, C. Potassium silicate in cherry cultivation: Fruit firmness and quality improvements. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1028, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yang, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X. Drilling of Super Large Granular Slow-Release Humic Acid Compound Fertilizer Improves Simultaneously Environmental and Economic Benefits in Peach Orchard. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 348, 108437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Colavita, G.M.; Sottile, F.; Di Lorenzo, R.; Pisciotta, A. Influence of foliar sprays of seaweed extracts on yield and quality of plums. Acta Hortic. 2011, 901, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Vázquez-Hernández, M.C.; Olalde-Portugal, V.; López-Jiménez, A.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Effect of AMF on yield and quality of papaya fruits. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 86, 573–578. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chouliaras, V.; Bantis, F.; Kormas, I. Seaweed extract effects on oil content and maturation rate in olive trees. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 120, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Manyaku, A.; Witbooi, H.; Laubscher, C.P. The Significance of Organic Horticulture in Mitigating Climate Change and Promoting the Production of Healthier Fruits and Vegetables. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rostami, M.; Shokouhian, A.; Mohebodini, M. Effect of humic acid, nitrogen concentrations and application method on the morphological, yield and biochemical characteristics of strawberry ‘Paros’. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2022, 22, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nargesi, M.M.; Sedaghathoor, S.; Hashemabadi, D. Effect of foliar application of amino acid, humic acid and fulvic acid on the oil content and quality of olive. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 3473–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Taskos, D.; Stamatiadis, S.; Yvin, J.-C.; Jamois, F. Effects of an Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. extract on grapevine yield and berry composition of a Merlot vineyard. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 250, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Al-Shatri, A.H.N.; Pakyürek, M.; Yaviç, A. Effect of Seaweed application on the vegetative growth of strawberry cv. Albion grown under Iraq ecological conditions. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2020, 18, 1211–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Al-Marsoumi, F.H.; Al-Hadethi, M.E. Efect of humic acid and seaweed extract spray in leaf mineral content of mango seedlings. Plant Archiv. 2020, 20, 827–830. [Google Scholar]
  99. El-Sese, A.M.; Mohamed, A.K.A.; Abou-Zaid, E.A.; Abd-El-Ghany, A.M.M. Impact of foliar application with seaweed extract, amino acids and vitamins on yield and berry quality of some Grapevine cultivars. SVU-Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 2, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mohamed, S.A.; Ahmed, H.S. Study effect of Chitosan and gibberellic acid on growth, flowering, fruit set, yield and fruit quality of Washington navel orange trees. Mid. East J. 2019, 8, 255–267. [Google Scholar]
  101. Soleimanzadeh, A.; Mizani, S.; Mirzaei, G.; Bavarsad, E.T.; Farhoodi, M.; Esfandiari, Z.; Rostami, M. Recent advances in characterizing the physical and functional properties of active packaging films containing pomegranate peel. Food Chem. X 2024, 22, 101416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Xin, Y.; Jin, Z.; Chen, F.; Lai, S.; Yang, H. Effect of chitosan coatings on the evolution of sodium carbonate-soluble pectin during sweet cherry softening under non-isothermal conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Colla, G.; Nardi, S.; Cardarelli, M.; Ertani, A.; Lucini, L.; Canaguier, R.; Rouphael, Y. Protein Hydrolysates as Biostimulants in Horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sangiorgio, D.; Cellini, A.; Donati, I.; Pastore, C.; Onofrietti, C.; Spinelli, F. Facing climate change: Application of microbial biostimulants to mitigate stress in horticultural crops. Agronomy 2020, 10, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Asif, A.; Ali, M.; Qadir, M.; Karthikeyan, R.; Singh, Z.; Khangura, R.; Di Gioia, F.; Ahmed, Z.F.R. Enhancing crop resilience by harnessing the synergistic effects of biostimulants against abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1276117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Rana, V.S.; Sharma, S.; Rana, N.; Sharma, U. Sustainable production through biostimulants under fruit orchards. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2022, 3, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Andreotti, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G.; Basile, B. Rate and timing of application of biostimulant substances to enhance fruit tree tolerance toward environmental stresses and fruit quality. Agronomy 2022, 12, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Franzoni, G.; Cocetta, G.; Prinsi, B.; Ferrante, A.; Espen, L. Biostimulants on crops: Their impact under abiotic stress conditions. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rojas-Rodríguez, M.L.; Ramírez-Gil, J.G.; González-Concha, L.F.; Balaguera-López, H.E. Biostimulants Improve Yield and Quality in Preharvest without Impinging on the Postharvest Quality of Hass Avocado and Mango Fruit: Evaluation under Organic and Traditional Systems. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Karaca, U.; Sabir, A. Sustainable mitigation of alkaline stress in grapevine rootstocks (Vitis spp.) by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Erwerbs-Obstbau 2017, 60, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Soltaniband, V.; Brégard, A.; Gaudreau, L.; Dorais, M. Biostimulants promote plant development, crop productivity, and fruit quality of protected strawberries. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ziogas, V.; Bravos, N.; Hussain, S.B. Preharvest foliar application of Si–Ca-based biostimulant affects postharvest quality and shelf-life of clementine mandarin (Citrus clementina Hort. Ex Tan). Horticulturae 2022, 8, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Świerczyński, S.; Antonowicz, A.; Bykowska, J. The effect of the foliar application of biostimulants and fertilisers on the growth and physiological parameters of maiden apple trees cultivated with limited mineral fertilisation. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Harhash, M.M.; Saad, R.M.; Mosa, W.F.A. Response of ”wonderful” pomegranate cultivar to the foliar application of some biostimulants. Plant Arch. 2021, 21, 09725210. [Google Scholar]
  115. Bodin, E.; Bellée, A.; Dufour, M.-C.; André, O.; Corio-Costet, M.-F. Grapevine Stimulation: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigate the Effects of Biostimulants and a Plant Defense Stimulator. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 15085–15096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Spann, T.M.; Little, H.A. Applications of a Commercial Extract of the Brown Seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum Increases Drought Tolerance in Container-grown ‘Hamlin’ Sweet Orange Nursery Trees. HortScience 2011, 46, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Samuels, L.J.; Setati, M.E.; Blancquaert, E.H. Towards a better understanding of the potential benefits of seaweed based biostimulants in Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Plants 2022, 11, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Pavlou, A.; Efstathiou, E.; Christodoulou, S.; Stylianou, S.; Manganaris, G. The effect of preharvest applications with biostimulants on qualitative properties and postharvest performance of loquat fruit. Acta Hortic. 2022, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dong, C.; Wang, G.; Du, M.; Niu, C.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, X.; Ma, D.; Ma, F.; Bao, Z. Biostimulants promote plant vigor of tomato and strawberry after transplanting. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 267, 109355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kiczorowski, P. Influence of NPK minerals and biostimulants on the growth, yield, and fruit nutritional value in cv. ’šampion’ apple trees growing on different rootstocks. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2019, 18, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Irani, H.; ValizadehKaji, B.; Naeini, M.R. Biostimulant-induced drought tolerance in grapevine is associated with physiological and biochemical changes. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yaghubi, K.; Ghaderi, N.; Vafaee, Y.; Javadi, T. Potassium silicate alleviates deleterious effects of salinity on two strawberry cultivars grown under soilless pot culture. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 213, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zouari, I.; Mechri, B.; Tekaya, M.; Dabbaghi, O.; Cheraief, I.; Mguidiche, A.; Annabi, K.; Laabidi, F.; Attia, F.; Hammami, M.; et al. Olive oil quality influenced by biostimulant foliar fertilizers. Braz. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 7, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shereni, C. Use of Biostimulants as an Alternate Approach to Achieve Plant Performance and Fruit Quality. Ph.D. Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Western Cape, South Africa, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  125. Hidangmayum, A.; Dwivedi, P.; Katiyar, D.; Hemantaranjan, A. Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2019, 25, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Mrid, R.B.; Benmrid, B.; Hafsa, J.; Boukcim, H.; Sobeh, M.; Yasri, A. Secondary metabolites as biostimulant and bioprotectant agents: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fleming, T.R.; Fleming, C.C.; Levy, C.C.B.; Repiso, C.; Hennequart, F.; Nolasco, J.B.; Liu, F. Biostimulants enhance growth and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and exhibit chemical priming action. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2019, 174, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J. Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Poveda, J. Cyanobacteria in plant health: Biological strategy against abiotic and biotic stresses. Crop. Prot. 2021, 141, 105450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Nephali, L.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Patterson, V.; Huyser, J.; Burgess, K.; Tugizimana, F. Biostimulants for plant growth and mitigation of abiotic stresses: A metabolomics perspective. Metabolites 2020, 10, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kaushal, P.; Ali, N.; Saini, S.; Pati, P.K.; Pati, A.M. Physiological and molecular insight of microbial biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1041413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lahlali, R.; Ezrari, S.; Radouane, N.; Belabess, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Mokrini, F.; Tahiri, A.; Peng, G. Bacillus spp.-Mediated Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants: Current and Future Prospects. In Bacilli in Climate Resilient Agriculture and Bioprospecting; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 487–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Balmer, A.; Pastor, V.; Glauser, G.; Mauch-Mani, B. Tricarboxylates induce defense priming against bacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Cha, J.-Y.; Kang, S.-H.; Ali, I.; Lee, S.C.; Ji, M.G.; Jeong, S.Y.; Shin, G.-I.; Kim, M.G.; Jeon, J.-R.; Kim, W.-Y. Humic acid enhances heat stress tolerance via transcriptional activation of Heat-Shock Proteins in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Laxa, M.; Liebthal, M.; Telman, W.; Chibani, K.; Dietz, K.-J. The role of the plant antioxidant system in drought tolerance. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Buqori, D.M.A.I.; Sugiharto, B.; Suherman; Siswoyo, T.A.; Hariyono, K. Mitigating drought stress by application of drought-tolerant Bacillus spp. enhanced root architecture, growth, antioxidant and photosynthetic genes expression in sugarcane. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hou, X.; Kong, Y.; Teng, Z.; Yang, C.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Z. Integrating genes and metabolites: Unraveling mango’s drought resilience mechanisms. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Khan, M.I.R.; Poor, P.; Janda, T. Salicylic Acid: A Versatile Signaling Molecule in Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1887–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Reyes-Hernández, S.J.; Zamora-Briseño, J.A.; Cerqueda-García, D.; Castaño, E.; Rodríguez-Zapata, L.C. Alterations in the sap-associated microbiota of Carica papaya in response to drought stress. Symbiosis 2020, 81, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Albasri, H.M.; Mawad, A.M.; Aldaby, E.S. Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Fruit Trees Using Microbial Biostimulants. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 18, 1454–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhou, Y.; Sommer, M.L.; Hochholdinger, F. Cold response and tolerance in cereal roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 7474–7481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Afonso, S.; Oliveira, I.; Ribeiro, C.; Vilela, A.; Meyer, A.S.; Gonçalves, B. Exploring the role of biostimulants in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit quality traits. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Khalid, F.; Rasheed, Y.; Asif, K.; Ashraf, H.; Maqsood, M.F.; Shahbaz, M.; Zulfiqar, U.; Sardar, R.; Haider, F.U. Plant Biostimulants: Mechanisms and Applications for Enhancing Plant Resilience to Abiotic Stresses. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 24, 6641–6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Alvarez, I.Z.; Ahmed, M.; McSorley, G.; Dunlop, M.; Lucas, I.; Hu, Y. An overview of biostimulant activity and plant responses under abiotic and biotic stress conditions. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2023, 4, 39–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Awasthi, S.; Chauhan, R.; Srivastava, S. The importance of beneficial and essential trace and ultratrace elements in plant nutrition, growth, and stress tolerance. In Plant Nutrition and Food Security in the Era of Climate Change; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wang, M.; Wang, R.; Mur, L.A.J.; Ruan, J.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. Functions of silicon in plant drought stress responses. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Himanshu; Sharma, S.; Rana, V.S.; Thakur, A.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, N. Unlocking the sustainable role of melatonin in fruit production and stress tolerance: A review. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2024, 5, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ali, A.Y.A.; Ibrahim, M.E.H.; Zhou, G.; Nimir, N.E.A.; Jiao, X.; Zhu, G.; Elsiddig, A.M.I.; Suliman, M.S.E.; Elradi, S.B.M.; Yue, W. Exogenous jasmonic acid and humic acid increased salinity tolerance of sorghum. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 871–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Malerba, M.; Cerana, R. Chitin- and chitosan-based derivatives in plant protection against biotic and abiotic stresses and in recovery of contaminated soil and water. Polysaccharides 2020, 1, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chanda, M.-J.; Merghoub, N.; EL Arroussi, H. Microalgae polysaccharides: The new sustainable bioactive products for the development of plant bio-stimulants? World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mannino, G.; Ricciardi, M.; Gatti, N.; Serio, G.; Vigliante, I.; Contartese, V.; Gentile, C.; Bertea, C.M. Changes in the Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant Properties of Prunus persica Fruits after the Application of a Commercial Biostimulant Based on Seaweed and Yeast Extract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Chung, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-S.; Lin, K.-H.; Wu, C.-W. Effect of Biostimulants on Plant Growth and Leaf Functional Compounds of Passiflora Plants. HortScience 2024, 59, 1682–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kaya, C.; Şenbayram, M.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Sulfur-enriched leonardite and humic acid soil amendments enhance tolerance to drought and phosphorus deficiency stress in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Hussain, H.A.; Men, S.; Hussain, S.; Chen, Y.; Ali, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, K.; Li, Y.; Xu, Q.; Liao, C.; et al. Interactive effects of drought and heat stresses on morpho-physiological attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and oxidative status in maize hybrids. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Abidi, W.; Akrimi, R.; Gouiaa, M. Mitigating drought stress by plant-derived biostimulant in Arbequina olive (Olea europeae L.) cultivar conducted in super high density. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.; Huang, J.; Peng, S.; Peng, S.; Xiong, D.; Xiong, D. Leaf rolling precedes stomatal closure in rice (Oryza sativa) under drought conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 6650–6661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kilic, N. Improvement in Plant Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality with Biostimulant Treatment in Organic Strawberry Cultivation. HortScience 2024, 59, 1165–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Rady, M.M.; El-Yazal, M.A.S. Metabolic changes in polyamines, phenylethylamine, and arginine during bud break in apple flower buds under foliar-applied dormancy-breaking agents. Int. J. Empir. Educ. Res. 2018, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Mosa, W.F.A.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Głuszek, S.; Górnik, K.; Anjum, M.A.; Saleh, A.A.; Abada, H.S.; Awad, R.M. Effect of some biostimulants on the vegetative growth, yield, fruit quality attributes and nutritional status of apple. Horticulturae 2022, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Dekhane, S.S.; Kumar, N.; Pisal, R.R. Assessment of the Effect of Different Bio-Stimulants on the Growth, Quality, and Yield of Strawberries in a Sub-Tropical Climatic Region: A Case Study. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2023, 45, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ma, Y.; Freitas, H.; Dias, M.C. Strategies and prospects for biostimulants to alleviate abiotic stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1024243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Mahfouze, S.A.; Mahfouze, H.A.; Helmi, R.Y.; Fathallah, F.B.; Aboud, K.A.; Ottai, M.E. The role of chitosan in improving cold stress tolerance in strawberry varieties. Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2024, 17, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gornik, K.; Grzesik, M.; Romanowska-Duda, B. The effect of chitosan on rooting of grapevine cuttings and on subsequent plant growth under drought and temperature stress. J. Fruit Ornamental Plant Res. 2008, 16, 333–343. [Google Scholar]
  164. Khan, A.S.; Munir, M.; Shaheen, T.; Tassawar, T.; Rafiq, M.A.; Ali, S.; Anwar, R.; Rehman, R.N.; Hasan, M.U.; Malik, A.U. Supplemental foliar applied mixture of amino acids and seaweed extract improved vegetative growth, yield and quality of citrus fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 296, 110903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Camprubi, A.; Solari, J.; Bonini, P.; Garcia-Figueres, F.; Colosimo, F.; Cirino, V.; Lucini, L.; Calvet, C. Plant performance and metabolomic profile of loquat in response to mycorrhizal inoculation, Armillaria mellea, and their interaction. Agronomy 2020, 10, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ioppolo, A.; Laudicina, V.A.; Badalucco, L.; Saiano, F.; Palazzolo, E. Wastewaters from citrus processing industry as natural biostimulants for soil microbial community. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 273, 111137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Hameed, A.; Fatma, S.; Wattoo, J.I.; Yaseen, M.; Ahmad, S. Accumulative effects of humic acid and multinutrient foliar fertilizers on the vegetative and reproductive attributes of citrus (Citrus reticulata cv. kinnow mandarin). J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 41, 2495–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Rana, V.S.; Lingwal, K.; Sharma, S.; Rana, N.; Pawar, R.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, U. Biostimulatory effect of seaweed extract on the fruiting and runner production of strawberry. Emerg. Life Sci. Res. 2022, 8, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Moenne, A.; González, A. Chitosan-, alginate-carrageenan-derived oligosaccharides stimulate defense against biotic and abiotic stresses, and growth in plants: A historical perspective. Carbohydr. Res. 2021, 503, 108298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Pascoalino, L.A.; Reis, F.S.; Barros, L.; Rodrigues, M.Â.; Correia, C.M.; Vieira, A.L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barreira, J.C.M. Effect of plant biostimulants on nutritional and chemical profiles of almond and hazelnut. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cirillo, A.; Izzo, L.; Ciervo, A.; Ledenko, I.; Cepparulo, M.; Piscitelli, A.; Di Vaio, C. Optimizing Apricot Yield and Quality with Biostimulant Interventions: A Comprehensive Analysis. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Khan, W.; Rayirath, U.P.; Subramanian, S.; Jithesh, M.N.; Rayorath, P.; Hodges, D.M.; Critchley, A.T.; Craigie, J.S.; Norrie, J.; Prithiviraj, B. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Dragovoz, I.V.; Yavorskaya, V.K.; Antoniuk, V.P.; Kurchii, B.A. Hormonal substances produced by microorganism association from ginseng roots. Physiol. Biochem. Cultiv. Plant 2009, 41, 393–399. [Google Scholar]
  174. Li, J.; Lardon, R.; Mangelinckx, S.; Geelen, D. A practical guide to the discovery of biomolecules with biostimulant activity. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 3797–3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Vijayan, S.R.; Santhiyagu, P.; Singamuthu, M.; Ahila, N.K.; Jayaraman, R.; Ethiraj, K. Synthesis and characterization of silver and gold nanoparticles using aqueous extract of seaweed, Turbinaria conoides, and their antimicrofouling activity. Sci. World J. 2014, 938272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classification of biostimulants.
Figure 1. Classification of biostimulants.
Stresses 05 00023 g001
Figure 2. Impact of microbial and non-microbial biostimulants on plant development and yield.
Figure 2. Impact of microbial and non-microbial biostimulants on plant development and yield.
Stresses 05 00023 g002
Figure 3. Mechanisms of biostimulants for stress tolerance: molecular and physiological.
Figure 3. Mechanisms of biostimulants for stress tolerance: molecular and physiological.
Stresses 05 00023 g003
Table 1. Source of biostimulants and their activity.
Table 1. Source of biostimulants and their activity.
Source of BiostimulantExampleActivity
Hydrolysis productEnzymatic (alfalfa, hay, pulses, fruits, and vegetables) and chemicals (feathers, bone meal, collagen from skin, animal tissues, and fish waste)Enhanced productivity
Improved leaves’ nutrient content and uptake[1,21,30,32,33,43]
Enhanced protein levels
Defense against both abiotic and biotic stressors.
Enhanced soil fertility by promoting the growth of soil microbes.
Aerobic digestion productAnimals and plants and lignin biomassInduced the effect of auxin.
Enhanced nutrient availability.
Biopreparations from marine algaeAscophyllum nodosum, Sargassm wightii, Ecklonia maxima, Gelidium pectinutumEnhanced antioxidant capacity and ability to scavenge free radicals.
Chelation effect.
Enhanced mitigation from abiotic and biotic stress.
Prolonged shelf life
Enhanced plant resilience to heat.
Defended against the stress of drought.
Consortia of useful fungusRhizophagus intraradices, Rhymbocarpus aggregatus, Glomus spp., Trichoderma spp., Heteroconium chaetospiraEnhanced plant growth and yield, both individually and in symbiosis.
Table 2. Application of biostimulants derived from various waste sources to promote plant growth.
Table 2. Application of biostimulants derived from various waste sources to promote plant growth.
Biostimulants SourcesEffect of BiostimulantsMaximum Increases in Germination/Yield/Biomass (%)Dosages/ConcentrationTreatment ConditionsReferences
Compost teaComposting compounds from organic wasteEnhance sugar beet growth and improve its quality.4% improvement in yield.500 ppmFoliar application was used in the field testing.[60]
Deproteinized leaf juice Byproducts of leaf protein isolation from alfalfa Enhance photosynthesis in sweet basil and promote the growth of roots and leaves.50.3% growth increase in shoot length.50, 100, 250 ppmFoliar spray, pot trails.[61]
Protein hydrolysate Chicken Feather WasteEnhance soil fertility and yield in mung bean.40% improvement in germination.10, 20, 30 mLPotting trials; irrigation. [62]
Lignin saltsPulp mill byproductsReduce the buildup of reactive oxygen species and increase rice’s photosynthesis.32.36% growth in shoot height.100, 200, 300, 400 ppmAdded to the rhizosphere.[63]
Humus-like substanceTea wasteStimulate the growth of tea trees.117% improvement in plant-dried weight. 20, 40, 80, 160 ppm Field trials; soil applications.[64]
Seaweed extractSeaweed wasteStimulate cress seed germination and growth.25% increase in germination percentage.100, 1000, 2500, 5000, 10,000 ppmPotting trials; irrigation.[65]
ChitosanExoskeleton of insects, shrimps and crabs Promote Salicornia bigelovii root development. 35% increase in biomass.5000, 10,000 ppmField trials; root dipping.[66]
Table 4. Effect of biostimulants on stress alleviation in plants.
Table 4. Effect of biostimulants on stress alleviation in plants.
StressName of CropBiostimulantMode of ApplicationEffect of Biostimulants on PlantReference
Cold stressAvocado
(Persea americana Mill.)
Fulvic acidDippingDecreased the chilling injury and increase the shelf life.[109]
Grapevine
(Vitis vinifera L.)
PGPBRoot immersionIncreased metabolic activity.[110]
Strawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)
Amino acidFoliar sprayDelayed the spring frost injury.[111]
Grapefruit
(Citrus × paradisi Macfad.)
Methyl JasmonatesDippingReduced the chilling injury.[112]
Heat stressApple
(Malus domestica Borkh.)
Humic acidFoliarReduced the sunburn[113]
Pomegranate
(Punica granatum L.)
KaolinFoliar sprayReduced the sunburn and fruit cracking.[114]
Drought stressGrapevines
(Vitis vinifera L.)
AMF (Glomus mosseae)Soil applicationIncreased leaf water potential and stomatal conductance.[115]
Citrus
(Citrus spp.)
Seaweed extractSoil drenchingIncreased the stem water potential and growth.[116]
Grape
(Vitis vinifera L.)
ChitosanDippingIncreased the rooting in cutting and no. of new canes[117]
Loquat
Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.
AMF (Funneliformis mosseae)Soil applicationIncreased the osmatic adjustment in the root.[118]
Salinity stressStrawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)
PGPBRoot dippingDecreased the sodium and chloride content in roots and leaf.[119]
Apple
(Malus domestica Borkh.)
AMF (Glomus versiforme)DrenchingReduced the ROS effect and increased the root length.[120]
Grapevines
(Vitis vinifera L.)
Potassium silicateDrenchingIncreased the plant height and yield.[121]
Strawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)
Potassium silicateDrenchingDecreased the proline ion content and increased the fruit yield.[122]
NutritionalOlive
(Olea europaea L.)
Humic acidDrenchingIncreased the shoot growth.[123]
Pear
(Pyrus communis L.)
Amino acidFoliar sprayIncreased the Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn content in the leaf.[124]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, M.; Subahan, G.M.; Sharma, S.; Singh, G.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, U.; Kumar, V. Enhancing Horticultural Sustainability in the Face of Climate Change: Harnessing Biostimulants for Environmental Stress Alleviation in Crops. Stresses 2025, 5, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses5010023

AMA Style

Singh M, Subahan GM, Sharma S, Singh G, Sharma N, Sharma U, Kumar V. Enhancing Horticultural Sustainability in the Face of Climate Change: Harnessing Biostimulants for Environmental Stress Alleviation in Crops. Stresses. 2025; 5(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses5010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Manya, Gudammagari Mabu Subahan, Sunny Sharma, Gurpreet Singh, Neha Sharma, Umesh Sharma, and Vineet Kumar. 2025. "Enhancing Horticultural Sustainability in the Face of Climate Change: Harnessing Biostimulants for Environmental Stress Alleviation in Crops" Stresses 5, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses5010023

APA Style

Singh, M., Subahan, G. M., Sharma, S., Singh, G., Sharma, N., Sharma, U., & Kumar, V. (2025). Enhancing Horticultural Sustainability in the Face of Climate Change: Harnessing Biostimulants for Environmental Stress Alleviation in Crops. Stresses, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses5010023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop