Next Article in Journal
Effects of Intermittent Drought During Tillering and Stalk Elongation Stages on the Physiological Attributes of Diverse Sugarcane Genotypes
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Dysregulation of Ribosomal Protein Genes in Mouse Brain Stress Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytoremediation Potential of Melia azedarach and Ailanthus altissima for Pb, Zn, and Cu from Aqueous Solution

1
Laboratory for Agricultural Productions Improvement, Biotechnology and Environment (LAPABE), Faculty of Sciences, University Mohammed First, BP-717, Oujda 60000, Morocco
2
University of Orleans, P2E-EA1207, INRAE USC1328, Rue de Chartres, CEDEX 2, 45067 Orleans, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Stresses 2024, 4(4), 923-934; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040062
Submission received: 4 November 2024 / Revised: 8 December 2024 / Accepted: 12 December 2024 / Published: 16 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant and Photoautotrophic Stresses)

Abstract

:
Growing concerns over metal pollution highlight the need for effective remediation strategies. This study evaluates the accumulation capacity and tolerance of Melia azedarach and Ailanthus altissima for trace elements (Pb, Zn, and Cu), aiming to assess their phytoremediation potential. Three-month-old seedlings of both species, grown from seeds collected at the Touissit mine site, were cultivated in perlite and irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution. Plants were exposed to various concentrations of metal salts—Pb(NO3)2 (8, 40, and 80 mg.L−1), ZnSO4 (8, 40, and 80 mg.L−1), and CuSO4 (2, 10, and 20 mg.L−1)—over a 90-day period. Growth, biomass, metal accumulation, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents were measured. Results indicate that M. azedarach exhibited enhanced biomass under Pb exposure, suggesting notable tolerance and potential for phytoremediation. Conversely, A. altissima showed an initial increase in biomass at low Pb levels, followed by a significant reduction at higher concentrations. Both species demonstrated decreased biomass under Zn and Cu treatments, with varying degrees of sensitivity. Notably, A. altissima accumulated significant levels of Pb, Zn, and Cu, particularly in the roots, indicating high phytoremediation potential. While M. azedarach also accumulated metals, levels were comparatively lower. Both species maintained chlorophyll content under metal stress, indicating resilience. Overall, this hydroponic screening highlights the considerable capacities of M. azedarach and A. altissima for Pb, Zn, and Cu tolerance, with A. altissima showing particularly high potential for Pb phytostabilization.

1. Introduction

High levels of trace elements and metalloid elements in the environment pose a significant threat to the health and survival of humans, animals, and plants, contributing to a global environmental issue due to its accumulation in agricultural products and bioamplification through food chains [1,2]. These metals, derived from various anthropogenic sources—including mining activities, urban runoff, wastewater treatment plants, boating operations, industrial effluents and waste, domestic landfill sites, and agricultural fungicide runoff—have progressively impacted ecosystems and environmental quality [3].
Trace elements are defined as metals and metalloids with an atomic density exceeding 4000 kg/m3 [4]. While plants require certain essential metals for growth, development, and production, excessive concentrations of these elements can lead to phytotoxicity, adversely affecting plant productivity, biomass, crop yields, and overall food security [5]. At elevated levels, both essential and non-essential trace elements can cause toxicity and inhibit plant growth [6]. For instance, copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) are essential for healthy plant growth, as they are integral to various enzymes and proteins. However, exposure to excessive levels of Cu and Zn can harm plants [7]. High soil Cu levels often stem from copper mining, wastewater discharge, and Cu-based agricultural chemicals [8]. Lead (Pb), comprising approximately 0.002% of the Earth’s crust, is highly toxic and persistent, posing significant risks to both plants and animals. Lead ranks as the second most hazardous metal due to its adverse ecological impacts [9,10]. The critical Pb threshold for plant tissue is around 2 mg kg−1; whereas, agricultural soils have a Pb threshold ranging from 50 to 300 mg kg−1 [11].
Improper handling of mine waste can lead to the dispersion and deposition of trace elements on surrounding soils, contaminating stream sediments and potentially impacting the quality of drinking water sources (both surface and groundwater) and agricultural soils located far from the original pollution sites [12,13]. Major sources of soil contamination include mining operations for copper, zinc, lead, manganese, and iron—metals widely used in industrial applications. Given the high concentrations of these metals frequently detected in soil samples from mining areas, a comprehensive evaluation of their environmental impacts is essential [14,15].
After mineral extraction, it is essential to restore productivity to affected areas and prepare them for revegetation. Due to growing environmental concerns, postmining reclamation has become a critical part of the mining process [16]. Phytoremediation stands out among the physical, chemical, and biological approaches to soil remediation, offering a cost-effective, environmentally sustainable, and economically beneficial option [17,18,19]. This emerging technique is widely used for soil remediation through the removal or stabilization of environmental contaminants [20,21,22] and extends its applications beyond soil stabilization and pollution mitigation to include aesthetic enhancement [23]. Phytoremediation is an eco-friendly bioremediation technique that utilizes metal-tolerant species to extract or stabilize trace elements in contaminated soils. These plants can either accumulate metals in their tissues, such as roots, shoots, and leaves, or immobilize them in the soil, preventing further spread. Despite its environmental benefits, phytoremediation has several limitations. It is limited by slow remediation, potential toxicity to plants, and restricted action to upper soil layers (up to 1 m), leaving deeper contamination untreated [24,25]. A practical and effective strategy for managing metal pollution called phytostabilization involves screening and selecting species or genotypes that exhibit a high tolerance to toxic metals, while minimizing their accumulation in the aerial parts [26]. Meanwhile, effective phytoremediation relies on selecting native plant species that are well-adapted to local soil conditions, highly tolerant to contaminants, and with efficient metal accumulation capacities [27]. Studying the concentration-dependent effects of Pb, Zn, and Cu on plant phytotoxicity is essential in this context. Hydroponic screening is often recommended as a cost-effective and efficient method for identifying species suited for trace element removal, reducing the need for expensive field trials [28].
Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle (A. altissima) is a fast-growing woody tree species regarded as an effective cover crop to prevent soil erosion and provide pulp and wood. It is notably resistant to environmental stressors, including trace elements, and is often identified as a resilient species [29]. Melia azedarach (M. Aedarach) is another fast-growing, drought-resistant species with the ability to thrive in low-fertility soils and exhibits strong tolerance to salinity [30].
This study aims to investigate (i) the accumulation capacity of Pb, Zn, and Cu in A. altissima and M. azedarach and (ii) their resistance to the toxic effects of these metals, thereby identifying candidates for phytoremediation in contaminated soils.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Metals (Pb, Zn, and Cu) on Biomass

The analysis of dry biomass (shoot and root) after 90 days (Figure 1) of M. azedarach and A. altissima under varying metal salt concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu indicates a consistent pattern of metal impact on both shoots and roots.
Biomass analysis revealed a stimulatory effect of Pb on M. azedarach, with shoot biomass increasing significantly at higher concentrations (0.7295 g at 80 mg.L−1 compared to 0.3709 g in the control). This aligns with studies where Pb exposure enhanced dry weight under certain conditions, potentially due to Pb-induced alterations in nutrient uptake or signaling [10,31]. Conversely, A. altissima showed tolerance only at lower Pb concentrations, with biomass declining significantly at 40 mg.L−1 and 80 mg.L−1, which can be explained by the role of Pb that negatively affects plant shoot growth by disrupting photosynthesis, mineral nutrition, water balance, hormonal regulation, and membrane structure and permeability [32].
Both species exhibited pronounced sensitivity to Zn, with significant biomass reductions across all concentrations (p < 0.05). The effects were particularly severe for M. azedarach at 80 mg.L−1, where shoot biomass dropped to 0.1476 g. Similarly, A. altissima showed no significant recovery across treatments, mirroring reports of Zn-induced disruption in nutrient balance and oxidative stress. While Zn is essential in trace amounts, excessive levels can impair photosynthesis and growth [10,32,33].
Both species showed progressive biomass reductions with increasing Cu concentrations (p < 0.05). M. azedarach shoot biomass decreased to 0.1104 g at 20 mg.L−1. Similar findings have been reported for Paulownia fortunei, where Cu exposure significantly reduced growth and biomass [34]. Root biomass was more affected than shoots, consistent with the role of roots as primary sites of metal uptake and damage [35].

2.2. Effect of Metals (Pb, Zn, and Cu) on Photosynthetic Pigments

Chlorophylls and total carotenoids are considered reliable and straightforward indicators of Pb-induced phytotoxicity in higher plants [36]. The effects of various metal treatments on photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids) in M. azedarach and A. altissima are summarized in (Table 1) The Pb treatments (8, 40, and 80 mg.L−1) significantly influenced the levels of total chlorophyll (Chl a + b) and carotenoids, with a general decline in Chl a + b content observed at higher Pb concentrations, suggesting detrimental effects on photosynthesis. In contrast, carotenoids displayed relatively lower sensitivity, potentially serving a protective role against oxidative damage induced by Pb stress [37]. Although Pb is non-essential to plant metabolism, it exhibits varying degrees of phytotoxicity, particularly impacting photosynthetic processes [38]. When Pb levels exceed critical thresholds, it severely disrupts all morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes [10]. Changes in the rate of photosynthesis in Pb-exposed plants can be attributed to alterations in chloroplast ultrastructure, disruptions in chlorophyll synthesis, disturbances in plastoquinone function, decreased mineral uptake, and the obstruction of electron transport [33].
Zn treatments at various concentrations (8, 40, and 80 mg.L−1) led to significant alterations in chlorophyll a + b (Chl a + b) and carotenoid levels compared to the control (C). An increase in Zn concentrations correlated with a decline in Chl a + b content, which may inhibit the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments, while carotenoid levels remained relatively stable, indicating a potentially protective role against oxidative stress induced by Zn toxicity [39]. Hydroponic experiments have demonstrated that Zn at 50 μM markedly reduces shoot dry weight, total plant biomass, and chlorophyll content in Solanum lycopersicum [40]. Furthermore, Zn at 600 μM has been shown to decrease growth rates, impair photosynthesis, and inactivate photosystem II reaction centers in Triticum durum [39].
Cu treatments at concentrations of 2, 10, and 20 mg.L−1 exhibited variable effects on chlorophyll a + b (Chl a + b) and carotenoid levels. Significant reductions in Chl a + b were observed at higher Cu concentrations, indicating potential toxicity to photosynthetic pigments, while carotenoid levels showed fluctuations, suggesting a protective role in mitigating Cu-induced stress [8]. However, excessive copper concentrations in plants can be toxic and may lead to oxidative damage. Specifically, Cu concentrations of 0.2, 5.0, 25, and 50 μM inhibited the growth of Lolium perenne, resulting in reduced root and shoot biomass, as well as decreased leaf size and area [41].
Overall, the slight decrease in chlorophyll a + b levels under Pb, Zn, and Cu treatments (Table 1) in both species suggests a degree of resilience to stress. The reduction in chlorophyll content may be attributed to direct enzyme inhibition or competitive exclusion of essential nutrients [8]. The stability of carotenoid levels can be interpreted as a strategy to mitigate oxidative stress, supporting the hypothesis that these plants exhibit adaptive responses to their metallic environment [42]. Previous studies highlight that the primary role of carotenoids is to protect plant cells [43].

2.3. Pb, Zn, and Cu Concentrations in Shoots and Roots

The trial conducted in this study revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in metal accumulation between A. altissima and M. azedarach (Figure 2), underscoring their potential for phytoremediation applications.
In the aerial parts of A. altissima, there was a notable increase in Pb concentrations with rising treatment levels. At 80 mg.L−1, the concentration of Pb reached 38.39 mg.kg−1 in the aerial parts, while at 40 mg.L−1, it was 20.75 mg.kg−1. Similar trends were observed in the roots of this species, indicating that A. altissima is capable of efficiently accumulating Pb in its tissues, positioning it as a potential candidate for the phytoremediation of Pb-contaminated soils. Conversely, M. azedarach exhibited lower levels of Pb accumulation in its aerial parts, with concentrations ranging from 18.66 mg.kg−1 to 24.76 mg.kg−1 across different treatment concentrations. In the roots, Pb levels were also relatively low, peaking at 147.68 mg.kg−1 at the highest concentration. Although M. azedarach does accumulate Pb, the observed concentrations were generally lower compared to those of A. altissima. These findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating the potential of A. altissima as a Pb accumulator [44,45], while highlighting the moderate Pb accumulation capacity of M. azedarach [46]. Also, the finding of (Mohebzadeh et al., 2021) aligns with our results; they found that A. altissima tends to accumulate at higher concentrations of Pb in both roots (45.33 mg.kg−1) and shoots (24.66 mg.kg−1) compared to M. azedarach, in a pot experiment of metal-contaminated soils with Pb and Ni amended with biochar and compost [47].
Both A. altissima and M. azedarach demonstrate significant Zn accumulation capacity in their aerial parts and roots. For A. altissima, Zn concentrations can reach as high as 283.25 mg.kg−1 in the aerial parts and up to 1348.56 mg.kg−1 in the roots. Similarly, M. azedarach exhibits substantial Zn levels, with concentrations reaching 325.56 mg.kg−1 in the aerial parts and 806.41 mg.kg−1 in the roots. These results affirm the capacity of both species to efficiently accumulate Zn, which may facilitate the remediation of Zn-contaminated soils. These findings are consistent with the reported Zn hyperaccumulation potential of A. altissima [48], while also underscoring the remarkable Zn accumulation capability of M. azedarach [49].
In terms of Cu accumulation, A. altissima shows Cu concentrations reaching up to mg.kg−1 in the aerial parts and up to 49.90 mg.kg−1 in the roots. Đunisijević Bojović et al. (2012) found that A. altissima accumulates up to 75.7 mg.kg−1 in the roots and 9.1 mg.kg−1 of Cu at concentrations of 20 µM.L−1 of Pb(NO3)2 [48]. M. azedarach accumulated concentrations reaching up to 24.28 mg.kg−1 in the aerial parts and up to 204.19 mg.kg−1 in the roots. These results indicate that both species are capable of efficiently accumulating Cu in the roots, which can be beneficial for the phytostabilization of Cu-contaminated soils. Previous studies have also shown that certain plant species possess a particular ability to accumulate Cu [50].
In general, the quantity of metals Pb, Zn, and Cu in the root system was greater compared to the shoot. This aligns with earlier studies, which found that most metal ions are primarily retained in the roots before being translocated to the shoots [51]. Plants selected for phytostabilization should exhibit low metal accumulation in aboveground tissues, restricted metal transfer from roots to shoots, robust canopy and root systems, rapid growth, and high resistance to metal pollution and adverse environmental conditions. Ideal candidates create dense vegetative cover, while minimizing metal concentrations in their aboveground biomass [52,53]. Based on their absorption characteristics for Pb, Zn, and Cu, these species can be considered suitable options for the remediation (phytostabilization) of contaminated soils.

2.4. Translocation Factor (TF) and Potential of Phytoremediation

Translocation factors (TF) are presented in Table 2. The TF values are consistently low (<1) across all treatments for the tested plant species, indicating that trace elements primarily accumulate in the roots. The highest TF values are observed for the Pb treatments (80 mg.L−1 and 8 mg.L−1) in A. altissima, as well as for Cu (20 mg.L−1) and Zn (8 mg.L−1 and 40 mg.L−1) in M. azedarach. According to [53], either of the two plant species can be classified as hyperaccumulators of Pb, Zn, or Cu. These results are consistent with findings from [47], which indicated that A. altissima exhibited the highest values for the transfer factor (TF), bioconcentration factor (BCF), and root-to-shoot factor (RF) for Pb. Our findings further corroborate its superior capability to translocate Pb from the roots to the shoots.
While both species exhibited elevated concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu in their roots, the shoot uptake and root accumulation of Zn were higher than those of Cu and Pb in both plant species, indicating their potential for phytostabilization. A. altissima demonstrated an effective ability to limit Zn translocation from roots to shoots, reflected in lower TF values compared to M. azedarach. Conversely, M. azedarach exhibited the strong restriction of translocation from roots to shoots for Pb and Cu, with consistently lower TF values across all treatments, suggesting its suitability for the phytostabilization of these metals.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Seeds of A. altissima and M. azedarach were collected from trees growing on polymetallic mine tailings in Touissit, NE Morocco. The seeds were surface-sterilized using 10% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite and germinated in petri dishes within a phytotron at 25 °C. Young seedlings were transplanted into pots, grown in peat, and irrigated with tap water (pH 6.0) for 3 months. Plants aged 3 months, with heights ranging between 5 cm and 10 cm, were then transferred to aerated hydroponic pots filled with perlite and tap water (pH 6.0) and precultured for 9 days with Hoagland nutrient solution. The nutritional solution contained 2.5 mM Ca (NO3)2, 2.5 mM KNO3, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.2 μM KH2PO4, 50 μM NaFeEDTA, 0.2 μM Na2MoO4, 10 μM H3BO3, 2 μM MnCl2, 0.5 μM CuSO4, 1.0 μM ZnSO4, and 0.2 μM NiSO4, adjusted to pH 6.0 using 0.5 mM MES (2-[N-morpholino] ethane sulfonic acid).

3.2. Experimental Design

A greenhouse study was conducted to assess the accumulation and resistance capabilities of A. altissima and M. azedarach for Pb, Zn, and Cu across varying concentrations. Stock solutions of Pb, Zn, and Cu were prepared using analytical grade reagents (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in Hoagland solution containing one of three metal salts (Pb (NO3)2, ZnSO4, CuSO4). Plants, aged 3 months and approximately 5–10 cm in height, were grown from seeds collected at the Pb-Zn mining site of Touissit in 1 L pots with perlite as the growth medium, one plant per pot. The plants were acclimatized in a hydroponic system for 9 days with Hoagland nutrient solution at 80% field capacity [54]. Subsequently, they were watered every 9 days with Hoagland’s nutrient solution containing one of three tested metal concentrations. Fresh solutions were prepared each time. Control plants received only Hoagland’s nutrient solution. The study took place in a phytotronic chamber at the Department of Biology, University Mohammed First, Oujda, Morocco, with a mean daily temperature of 25 °C and a 12 h photoperiod. The treatments were control (C) with plants only receiving Hoagland nutrient solution, Pb (8, 40, and 80 mg.L−1), Zn (8, 40, and 80 mg.L−1), and Cu (2, 10, and 20 mg.L−1), and the nutrient solutions were 5 to 10 times higher than the maximum phyto-accessible concentrations measured (data not published) in the soils of the Touissit and Zaïda mining sites, as well as the phytotoxic limits for plants growing in these metal conditions [55]. The treatments were labeled with the chemical symbol of the metal followed by a number indicating the metal concentration in mg.L−1.

3.3. Harvesting Procedure

After 90 days of metal treatment, leaf and root samples were collected from control and metal-treated plants for the estimation of various morpho-physiological, biochemical parameters. Leaves in the same position were sampled from control and trace element-treated plants to estimate the metal and photosynthetic pigment content. For each measurement or assay, 3 replicates were used.

3.4. Analytical Determinations

The parameters measured were plant growth (root and shoots dry weight), stress indicators (chlorophylls a, b, and carotenoids), and the concentration and accumulation of metals in plant tissues.
On the 90th day after the start of Pb, Zn, and Cu stress, all plant material was weighed (total dry weight), and the length of the roots and shoots measured.
The third completely grown leaf from the top was taken for chlorophyll and carotenoid analysis. To estimate photosynthetic pigments, fresh leaf blade material (0.1 g) was put in 25 mL glass test tubes, followed by 15 mL of 96% (v/v) ethanol. The plant material tubes were incubated in a water bath at 79.8 °C for three to four hours, or until the samples were completely discolored. The absorbance of chlorophylls a and b was determined at 665 and 649 nm, respectively. Total chlorophyll was determined. Carotenoid concentration was evaluated vis spectrophotometer at 470 nm [56]. Chlorophyll a and b, along with total carotenoid content, were calculated using the following equations and expressed as mg·kg−1 fresh weight (fw). Where V represents the extract volume, W denotes the sample quantity, and D corresponds to the absorbance value at the specified wavelength.
Chlorophyll   a   = 12.7   D 663 2.69   D 645 × V   1000 ×   W
C hlorophyll   b = 22.9   D 645 4.68   D 663 × V   1000 ×   W
Carotenoids   = 4.69   D 440 chlorophyll   a + chlorophyll   b × 0.286 × V / 1000 ×   W  
The plant samples, including both leaves and roots, were separated and dried in an oven at 60 °C for 72 h to facilitate acid mineralization. Subsequently, the dried samples were subjected to acid digestion in a microwave system, where 0.2 g of plant material was combined with 6 mL of 65% nitric acid (HNO3) and 3 mL of 37% hydrochloric acid (HCl). The mixture was then heated for 15 min at 180 °C using a pressured vacuum microwave system (Multiwave 3000; Anton Paar GmbH, Ostfildern, Germany). This heating was followed by a 15-min stabilization period at 180 °C and an additional 15 min for cooling. After cooling to room temperature, the samples were diluted in 30 mL of ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm) and filtered through a 0.45 μm nitrocellulose membrane [57]. The concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) (ULTIMA 2, HORIBA, San Francisco, CA, USA), with a detection limit of below 100 ppb. To measure Pb, Zn, and Cu concentrations in the plant organs as described by [58].

3.5. Translocation Factor (TF)

The translocation factor (TF) is utilized to evaluate a plant’s ability to transport trace elements from the roots to the shoots, providing insights into its efficiency in accumulating these metals from the growth medium. A TF value greater than 1 signifies the effective movement of trace elements from the roots to the shoots, indicating the plant’s suitability for phyto-extraction. The TF is calculated using the following formula [59]:
TF   = C metal   plant   shoot / C metal   plant   root

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The experiment was executed in a factorial trial arranged in a completely randomized design (CRD) with two-factor trace elements and concentrations, with three replicates for each parameter. Chlorophyll content, carotenoid trace element accumulation, and plant growth and biomass were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) using the LSD test with trace elements and concentration as factors.

4. Conclusions

This study evaluates the phytoremediation potential of A. altissima and M. azedarach for Pb, Zn, and Cu under controlled conditions. M. azedarach demonstrates notable lead tolerance, maintaining biomass under increased Pb concentrations, while A. altissima shows reduced resilience at higher Pb levels. Both species exhibit significant sensitivity to Zn and Cu, with decreased biomass across all concentrations compared to control. Analysis of photosynthetic pigments reveals a slight decline in chlorophyll content in response to Pb, Zn, and Cu treatments, suggesting some degree of resilience to metal-induced stress. According to this study, both A. altissima and M. azedarach retain higher metal concentrations in roots than shoots, meeting key criteria for effective phytostabilization. A. altissima exhibits significant Pb accumulation in roots, positioning it as an effective candidate for the phytostabilization of Pb-contaminated soils. Conversely, M. azedarach demonstrates superior Zn and Cu accumulation, highlighting its potential for stabilizing soils contaminated with these metals. This was confirmed by the translocation factors (TF < 1), which indicate a predominant accumulation of trace elements in the roots of both species meeting key criteria for effective phytostabilization. These species, with their robust metal root absorption and translocation patterns, are promising candidates for the phytostabilization of contaminated soils.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O.; data curation, M.O., and Y.C.; formal analysis, M.O., D.M., and A.B.; funding acquisition, M.O.; investigation, M.O., Y.C., and D.M.; methodology, M.O., A.B., D.M., and Y.C.; project administration, A.B.; resources, A.B., M.A., and D.M.; software, M.O., and Y.C.; supervision, A.B., and M.A.; validation, M.O., Y.C., and A.B.; visualization, M.O., A.B., and D.M.; writing—original draft, M.O., Y.C., A.B., M.A., and D.M.; writing—review and editing, M.O., Y.C., A.B., M.A., and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was carried out as part of the PPR2 N° 9-17 priority project, entitled: “Using microbial and plant biotechnologies to rehabilitate abandoned mining sites (BIOMIVER)”, with support from the Moroccan Ministry of National Education, Vocational Training, Higher Education, and Scientific Research, and CNRST.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Xiao, T.; Chen, Y.; Beiyuan, J.; She, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, M.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Legacy of Multiple Heavy Metal(Loid)s Contamination and Ecological Risks in Farmland Soils from a Historical Artisanal Zinc Smelting Area. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 720, 137541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yang, F.-C.O. The Research of Using STEM-6E Teaching Model in AR Technology Learning: System Development and Evaluation. IIAI Lett. Inform. Interdiscip. Res. 2023, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. EXS 2012, 101, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vardhan, K.H.; Kumar, P.S.; Panda, R.C. A Review on Heavy Metal Pollution, Toxicity and Remedial Measures: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 290, 111197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pierattini, E.C.; Francini, A.; Raffaelli, A.; Sebastiani, L. Surfactant and Heavy Metal Interaction in Poplar: A Focus on SDS and Zn Uptake. Tree Physiol. 2017, 38, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ahamad, A.; Janardhana Raju, N.; Madhav, S.; Gossel, W.; Ram, P.; Wycisk, P. Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil and Road Dust around Sonbhadra Industrial Region, Uttar Pradesh, India: Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Yang, C.; Guo, Y.; Gao, P.; Wang, T.; Liu, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhou, G. Responses in Plant Growth and Root Exudates of Pistia Stratiotes under Zn and Cu Stress. Plants 2024, 13, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Giannakoula, A.; Therios, I.; Chatzissavvidis, C. Effect of Lead and Copper on Photosynthetic Apparatus in Citrus (Citrus aurantium L.) Plants. The Role of Antioxidants in Oxidative Damage as a Response to Heavy Metal Stress. Plants 2021, 10, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. ATSDR Priority List of Hazardous Substances; Agency for Toxic Substances and Diseases: Atlanta, Georgia, 2011.
  10. Zulfiqar, U.; Farooq, M.; Hussain, S.; Maqsood, M.; Hussain, M.; Ishfaq, M.; Ahmad, M.; Anjum, M.Z. Lead Toxicity in Plants: Impacts and Remediation. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 250, 109557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Inglezakis, V.J.; Zorpas, A.A.; Karagianides, A.; Samaras, P.; Voukalli, I. European Union Legislation on Sewage Sludge Management. In Proceedings of the 3’rd International CEMEPE&SECOTOX Conference, Skiathos, Greece, 19–24 June 2011; Grafima Publications: Skiathos, Greece, 2011; pp. 475–480. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Y.; Dong, R.; Zhou, Y.; Luo, X. Characteristics of Groundwater Discharge to River and Related Heavy Metal Transportation in a Mountain Mining Area of Dabaoshan, Southern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 679, 346–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  14. Soltani, N.; Sadeghi, T.; Khalili, P.; Mahmoodi, M.R.; Saadloo, M.; Baneshi, M.R.; Chermahini, S.A.; Shamsizade, A. Comparing the Association between Heavy Metals and Cognitive Status and Depression in Miners and Non-Miners: A Study from Southeast of Iran. Neurotoxicology 2023, 99, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bhatti, Z.I.; Ishtiaq, M.; Khan, S.A.; Nawab, J.; Ghani, J.; Ullah, Z.; Khan, S.; Baig, S.A.; Muhammad, I.; Din, Z.U.; et al. Contamination Level, Source Identification and Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Drinking Water Sources of Mining and Non-Mining Areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. J. Water Health 2022, 20, 1343–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sheoran, V.; Sheoran, A.S.; Poonia, P. International Journal of Soil, Sediment and Water Soil Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Land by Revegetation: A Review. Int. J. Soil. Sediment. Water 2010, 3, 13. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wei, Z.; Gu, H.; Van Le, Q.; Peng, W.; Lam, S.S.; Yang, Y.; Li, C.; Sonne, C. Perspectives on Phytoremediation of Zinc Pollution in Air, Water and Soil. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2021, 24, 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salas-Moreno, M.; Marrugo-Negrete, J. Phytoremediation Potential of Cd and Pb-Contaminated Soils by Paspalum Fasciculatum Willd. Ex Flüggé. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2020, 22, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sarwar, N.; Imran, M.; Shaheen, M.R.; Ishaque, W.; Kamran, M.A.; Matloob, A.; Rehim, A.; Hussain, S. Phytoremediation Strategies for Soils Contaminated with Heavy Metals: Modifications and Future Perspectives. Chemosphere 2017, 171, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xin, J.; Ma, S.; Li, Y.; Zhao, C.; Tian, R. Pontederia Cordata, an Ornamental Aquatic Macrophyte with Great Potential in Phytoremediation of Heavy-Metal-Contaminated Wetlands. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 111024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Emenike, C.U.; Jayanthi, B.; Agamuthu, P.; Fauziah, S.H. Biotransformation and Removal of Heavy Metals: A Review of Phytoremediation and Microbial Remediation Assessment on Contaminated Soil. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Juwarkar, A.A.; Jambhulkar, H.P. Phytoremediation of Coal Mine Spoil Dump through Integrated Biotechnological Approach. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4732–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Banerjee, R.; Goswami, P.; Mukherjee, A. Stabilization of Iron Ore Mine Spoil Dump Sites with Vetiver System. In Bio-Geotechnol. Mine Site Rehabil; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 393–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, A.; Wang, Y.; Tan, S.N.; Mohd Yusof, M.L.; Ghosh, S.; Chen, Z. Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 513099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gavrilescu, M. Enhancing Phytoremediation of Soils Polluted with Heavy Metals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 74, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Monaci, F.; Trigueros, D.; Mingorance, M.D.; Rossini-Oliva, S. Phytostabilization Potential of Erica australis L. and Nerium oleander L.: A Comparative Study in the Riotinto Mining Area (SW Spain). Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 2345–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cetinkaya, G.; Sozen, N. Plant Species Potentially Useful in the Phytostabilization Process for the Abandoned CMC Mining Site in Northern Cyprus. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2011, 13, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhivotovsky, O.P.; Kuzovkina, J.A.; Schulthess, C.P.; Morris, T.; Pettinelli, D.; Ge, M. Hydroponic Screening of Willows (Salix L.) for Lead Tolerance and Accumulation. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2010, 13, 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Stylianou, M.; Gavriel, I.; Vogiatzakis, I.N.; Zorpas, A.; Agapiou, A. Native Plants for the Remediation of Abandoned Sulphide Mines in Cyprus: A Preliminary Assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 274, 110531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dias, M.C.; Azevedo, C.; Costa, M.; Pinto, G.; Santos, C. Melia Azedarach Plants Show Tolerance Properties to Water Shortage Treatment: An Ecophysiological Study. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Horbowicz, M.; Horbowicz, M.; Mitrus, J. Impact of Short-Term Exposure to Lead and Cadmium of Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) Seedlings Grown in Hydroponic Culture. J. Elem. 2020, 25, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharma, S.S.; Dietz, K.-J.; Mimura, T. Vacuolar Compartmentalization as Indispensable Component of Heavy Metal Detoxification in Plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1112–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, A.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Sytar, O. Lead Toxicity, Defense Strategies and Associated Indicative Biomarkers in Talinum Triangulare Grown Hydroponically. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 1056–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, J.; Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Ke, S. Physiological Responses and Detoxific Mechanisms to Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd in Young Seedlings of Paulownia fortunei. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22, 1916–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Küpper, H.; Andresen, E. Mechanisms of Metal Toxicity in Plants. Metallomics 2016, 8, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sharma, P.; Dubey, R.S. Lead Toxicity in Plants. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 17, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Küpper, H.; Setlik, I.; Spiller, M.; Küpper, F.; Prasil, O. Heavy Metal-Induced Inhibition of Photosynthesis: Targets of in Vivo Heavy Metal Chlorophyll Formation. J. Phycol. 2002, 38, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tian, S.-K.; Lu, L.-L.; Yang, X.-E.; Huang, H.-G.; Brown, P.; Labavitch, J.; Liao, H.-B.; He, Z.-L. The Impact of EDTA on Lead Distribution and Speciation in the Accumulator Sedum Alfredii by Synchrotron X-Ray Investigation. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 159, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Paunov, M.; Koleva, L.; Vassilev, A.; Vangronsveld, J.; Goltsev, V. Effects of Different Metals on Photosynthesis: Cadmium and Zinc Affect Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Durum Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pavithra, G.J.; Mahesh, S.; Parvathi, M.S.; Basavarajeshwari, R.M.; Nataraja, K.N.; Shankar, A.G. Comparative Growth Responses and Transcript Profiling of Zinc Transporters in Two Tomato Varieties under Different Zinc Treatments. Indian. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 21, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Conti, L.; Cesco, S.; Mimmo, T.; Pii, Y.; Valentinuzzi, F.; B Melo, G.W.; Ceretta, C.A.; Trentin, E.; Marques, A.C.R.; Brunetto, G. Iron Fertilization to Enhance Tolerance Mechanisms to Copper Toxicity of Ryegrass Plants Used as Cover Crop in Vineyards. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Houri, T.; Khairallah, Y.; Al Zahab, A.; Osta, B.; Romanos, D.; Haddad, G. Heavy Metals Accumulation Effects on The Photosynthetic Performance of Geophytes in Mediterranean Reserve. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 2020, 32, 874–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. You, J.; Chan, Z. Ros Regulation during Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 165102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abbaslou, H.; Bakhtiari, S. Phytoremediation Potential of Heavy Metals by Two Native Pasture Plants (Eucalyptus grandis and Ailanthus altissima) Assisted with AMF and Fibrous Minerals in Contaminated Mining Regions. Pollution 2017, 3, 471–486. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lebrun, M.; Alidou Arzika, I.; Miard, F.; Nandillon, R.; Bayçu, G.; Bourgerie, S.; Morabito, D. Effect of Fertilization of a Biochar and Compost Amended Technosol: Consequence on Ailanthus Altissima Growth and As-and Pb-specific Root Sorption. Soil. Use Manag. 2020, 36, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khamis, M.H.; El-Mahrook, E.M.; Abdelgawad, M.A. Phytoextraction Potential of Cadmium and Lead Contamination Using Melia Azedarach and Populus Alba Seedlings. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 13, 4726–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohebzadeh, F.; Motesharezadeh, B.; Jafari, M.; Zare, S.; Aman, M.S. Remediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Soil by Utilizing Organic Amendments and Two Plant Species (Ailanthus altissima and Melia azedarach). Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Đunisijević Bojović, D.; Đukić, M.; Maksimović, V.; Skočajić, D.; Suručić, L. The Effects of Iron Deficiency on Lead Accumulation in Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle Seedlings. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 1517–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huang, X.; Zhu, F.; He, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, G.; Liu, M.; Xu, H. Photosynthesis Performance and Antioxidative Enzymes Response of Melia Azedarach and Ligustrum Lucidum Plants Under Pb–Zn Mine Tailing Conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 571157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nirola, R.; Megharaj, M.; Palanisami, T.; Aryal, R.; Venkateswarlu, K.; Naidu, R. Evaluation of Metal Uptake Factors of Native Trees Colonizing an Abandoned Copper Mine—A Quest for Phytostabilization. J. Sustain. Min. 2015, 14, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Malar, S.; Sahi, S.V.; Favas, P.J.C.; Venkatachalam, P. Mercury Heavy-Metal-Induced Physiochemical Changes and Genotoxic Alterations in Water Hyacinths [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)]. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4597–4608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nouri, J.; Lorestani, B.; Yousefi, N.; Khorasani, N.; Hasani, A.H.; Seif, F.; Cheraghi, M. Phytoremediation Potential of Native Plants Grown in the Vicinity of Ahangaran Lead–Zinc Mine (Hamedan, Iran). Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 62, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ernst, W.H.O. Phytoextraction of Mine Wastes—Options and Impossibilities. Geochemistry 2005, 65, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Millner, P.D.; Kitt, D.G. The Beltsville Method for Soilless Production of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Mycorrhiza 1992, 2, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Krämer, U. Metal Hyperaccumulation in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wintermans, J.F.G.M.; De Mots, A. Spectrophotometric Characteristics of Chlorophylls a and b and Their Phenophytins in Ethanol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biophys. Incl. Photosynth. 1965, 109, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nandillon, R.; Lebrun, M.; Miard, F.; Gaillard, M.; Sabatier, S.; Villar, M.; Bourgerie, S.; Morabito, D. Capability of Amendments (Biochar, Compost and Garden Soil) Added to a Mining Technosol Contaminated by Pb and As to Allow Poplar Seed (Populus nigra L.) Germination. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sylvain, B.; Mikael, M.-H.; Florie, M.; Emmanuel, J.; Marilyne, S.; Sylvain, B.; Domenico, M. Phytostabilization of As, Sb and Pb by Two Willow Species (S. viminalis and S. purpurea) on Former Mine Technosols. Catena 2016, 136, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mohanty, M.; Patra, H.K. Phytoremediation Potential of Paragrass— An In Situ Approach for Chromium Contaminated Soil. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2012, 14, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Shoot (above the x-axis) and root (below the x-axis) biomass of A. altissima (A) and M. azedarach (B) after 90 days of cultivation at different concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu. Data represent mean values from three replicates ± standard deviation. Bars sharing the same letter indicate no significant difference (p < 0.05). Different colors indicate different treatments (Pb, Zn, Cu and control).
Figure 1. Shoot (above the x-axis) and root (below the x-axis) biomass of A. altissima (A) and M. azedarach (B) after 90 days of cultivation at different concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu. Data represent mean values from three replicates ± standard deviation. Bars sharing the same letter indicate no significant difference (p < 0.05). Different colors indicate different treatments (Pb, Zn, Cu and control).
Stresses 04 00062 g001
Figure 2. Metals concentrations in shoots (above the x-axis) and roots (below the x-axis) of A. altissima, Pb (A), Zn (B), and Cu (C), and M. Azedarach Pb (D), Zn (E), and Cu (F), grown for 90 days under different Pb, Zn, and Cu concentrations. Data are mean values of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Bars indicated by the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Metals concentrations in shoots (above the x-axis) and roots (below the x-axis) of A. altissima, Pb (A), Zn (B), and Cu (C), and M. Azedarach Pb (D), Zn (E), and Cu (F), grown for 90 days under different Pb, Zn, and Cu concentrations. Data are mean values of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Bars indicated by the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Stresses 04 00062 g002
Table 1. Chl a, b, and carotenoid content (mg.g−1) in A. altissima and M. azedarach grown for 90 days under different Pb, Zn, and Cu concentrations in the hydroponic medium. Data are mean values of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Cases indicated by the same letters are not statistically significant.
Table 1. Chl a, b, and carotenoid content (mg.g−1) in A. altissima and M. azedarach grown for 90 days under different Pb, Zn, and Cu concentrations in the hydroponic medium. Data are mean values of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Cases indicated by the same letters are not statistically significant.
M. azedarachA. altissima
TreatmentsChl a±Chl b±Chl a + b±Carotenoids±Chl a±Chl b±Chl a + b±Carotenoids±
C3.441 a0.250.458 a0.123.898 a0.360.995 a0.067.513 a2.741.203 ab0.668.716 a3.392.068 a0.58
Zn 83.002 ab0.240.611 a0.273.613 a0.470.996 a0.115.351 ab0.520.235 ab0.545.586 ab0.731.341 ab0.23
Zn 403.243 a0.640.335 a0.273.578 a0.911.058 a0.114.531 ab0.651.300 ab0.235.831 ab0.421.193 ab0.33
Zn 803.072 ab0.33−0.095 a0.222.977 a0.531.067 a0.082.966 b0.420.738 ab0.683.704 b1.110.598 b0.20
Pb 81.069 c0.784.537 a0.215.606 a0.59−1.352 b0.285.014 ab0.720.497 ab0.315.511 ab0.471.048 b0.56
Pb402.279 abc0.140.476 a0.162.755 a0.190.582 ab0.084.543 ab0.341.236 ab0.335.779 ab0.651.095 b0.02
Pb 802.387 abc0.800.111 a0.192.498 a0.970.823 ab0.203.630 b0.631.605 a0.705.235 ab1.210.698 b0.14
Cu 21.019 c0.312.528 a0.223.548 a0.49−0.665 ab0.054.065 b0.570.968 ab0.135.034 ab0.680.996 b0.18
Cu 102.063 abc0.810.033 a4.672.096 a3.920.761 ab2.134.235 b1.071.820 a0.496.055 ab1.450.989 b0.20
Cu 201.632 bc0.370.100 a2.171.733 a1.810.651 ab0.984.881 ab0.74−0.175 b1.074.706 b0.341.343 ab0.34
Pr > F (Model)0.03 0.61 0.82 0.35 0.30 0.37 0.54 0.20
Table 2. Translocation factor of M. azedarach and A. altissima of Pb, Zn, and Cu.
Table 2. Translocation factor of M. azedarach and A. altissima of Pb, Zn, and Cu.
SpeciesPb 8Pb 40Pb 80Zn 8Zn 40Zn 80Cu 2Cu 10Cu 20
A. altissima0.730.450.770.240.190.210.540.350.64
M. azedarach0.290.220.170.570.560.340.270.100.12
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oujdi, M.; Chafik, Y.; Boukroute, A.; Morabito, D.; Addi, M. Phytoremediation Potential of Melia azedarach and Ailanthus altissima for Pb, Zn, and Cu from Aqueous Solution. Stresses 2024, 4, 923-934. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040062

AMA Style

Oujdi M, Chafik Y, Boukroute A, Morabito D, Addi M. Phytoremediation Potential of Melia azedarach and Ailanthus altissima for Pb, Zn, and Cu from Aqueous Solution. Stresses. 2024; 4(4):923-934. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oujdi, Mohammed, Yassine Chafik, Azzouz Boukroute, Domenico Morabito, and Mohamed Addi. 2024. "Phytoremediation Potential of Melia azedarach and Ailanthus altissima for Pb, Zn, and Cu from Aqueous Solution" Stresses 4, no. 4: 923-934. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040062

APA Style

Oujdi, M., Chafik, Y., Boukroute, A., Morabito, D., & Addi, M. (2024). Phytoremediation Potential of Melia azedarach and Ailanthus altissima for Pb, Zn, and Cu from Aqueous Solution. Stresses, 4(4), 923-934. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040062

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop