The Efficacy of Technological Integration and Data Sharing in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Category Management in Retailer–Supplier Partnerships
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Gap
- Research Question: How do cloud-based inventory platforms and real-time data sharing improve forecasting accuracy and inventory turnover for retailer–supplier CM partnerships in Saudi Arabia’s FMCG sector?
3. Methodology
- Exploring under-researched aspects of retailer–supplier collaborations in the Saudi FMCG context;
- Integrating complex, multidisciplinary evidence from operations management, information systems, and retail marketing literature;
- Developing new conceptual insights by examining established theories through the lens of emerging market dynamics.
4. Search Protocol
4.1. Key Words and Terms
- The study’s research questions and the aims and objectives of the included articles;
- The titles and abstracts of the articles considered for the study;
- The phrases of other CM literature used in the study.
4.2. Database Selection
4.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
4.4. Screening Process
4.5. Complementary Searches
4.6. Quantitative Synthesis of Literature Trends
5. Conceptual Frameworks
5.1. Core Components of the Framework
- CM: Acts as the strategic foundation of the framework, optimising product assortment, pricing, and promotions based on consumer insights (Kurtuluş et al., 2014).
- Technological integration: Enables collaboration through AI, IoT (internet of things), blockchain, and cloud-based platforms, enhancing inventory control and demand forecasting (Fatorachian & Kazemi, 2021).
- Data sharing: Facilitates transparency in supply chains, allowing for joint decision-making on inventory, promotions, and market trends (Cui et al., 2015).
5.2. Interdependencies and Outcomes
- Operational efficiency: Technology and data sharing reduce stockouts and costs and improve order fulfilment (Propositions 2 and 6).
- Consumer-centric strategies: Shared data refine demand forecasting, enabling personalised offers (Proposition 3).
- Collaborative advantage: Trust and standardised protocols mitigate cultural hesitancy toward data sharing (Almughthim & Jradi, 2023), fostering long-term partnerships.
5.3. Contextual Challenges in Saudi Arabia
- Cultural resistance: Reluctance to share data due to organisational silos (Abogamous, 2022).
- Technological gaps: High implementation costs and skill shortages (Alqahtani & Wamba, 2012).
- Regulatory needs: A lack of data governance frameworks to ensure security (Ivarsson & Alvstam, 2010).
5.4. Feedback Loops
- Performance metrics: Real-time analytics (e.g., point-of-sale data) create feedback loops, allowing for the continuous refinement of CM strategies.
- Sustainability: Alignment with the Saudi Vision 2030 drives the adoption of sustainable retail practices and eco-friendly technology (Benzidia et al., 2021).
5.5. Aspects and Propositions
- Proposition 1: Within the Saudi FMCG sector, the integration of culturally attuned data-sharing protocols and affordable technological solutions is a valuable strategic resource that can enhance the effectiveness of CM by improving joint decision-making.
- Proposition 2: Technology-enabled data exchanges between Saudi retailers and suppliers can improve the efficiency of inventory management by providing real-time overviews of localised demand patterns, thereby reducing culturally influenced stockouts and overstocking.
- Proposition 3: The combination of shared data and integrated technology within Saudi retailer–supplier partnerships can provide a unique knowledge resource that empowers category managers to make market-specific and strategic decisions about product selection, pricing, and promotions.
- Proposition 4: Combining technology and data sharing within Saudi partnerships can reduce transaction and operational costs by improving the effectivity of culturally shaped business processes and minimising inefficiencies in the supply chain.
- Proposition 5: For Saudi retailers and suppliers, data sharing and technological integration can improve overall supply chain resilience and agility, ensuring that adaptations to the rapid transformations resulting from the Saudi Vision 2030 are more responsive.
6. Analysis of the Literature
6.1. Information Extraction
6.2. Strategies for Effective CM
6.3. Technological Integration for Retailer–Supplier Partnerships
6.4. Leveraging Data Sharing for Enhanced Retailer–Supplier Partnerships
6.5. The Saudi Retail Sector
7. Results
7.1. The Interdependent Roles of CM, Technological Integration, and Data Sharing
7.2. Contextual Challenges Moderating Implementation
7.3. Validation of Propositions and Framework Dynamics
- Proposition 1 (Culturally Attuned Integration): The study confirmed that culturally attuned protocols are necessary for success. Partnerships that invest in relationship-building and clear data governance frameworks see markedly improved joint decision-making (Aastrup et al., 2007). However, the widespread cultural resistance to data sharing (Abogamous, 2022) means that this strategic resource is rare and undervalued throughout the sector.
- Proposition 2 (Inventory Efficiency): Inventory efficiency is partially achieved by firms that adopt inventory management systems, which then report reductions in stockouts (Grewal et al., 2021). However, the lack of fully integrated, real-time data sharing between partners prevents optimisation (Cui et al., 2015), confirming the framework’s interdependency.
- Proposition 3 (Consumer-centric Strategies): Consumer-centric strategies go unused in many companies. The inability to share data efficiently prevents the development of the unique knowledge resource needed for personalised offers and tailored promotions (Abunar et al., 2016), thereby missing a key competitive advantage.
- Proposition 4 (Cost Reduction): Evidence for cost reduction is mixed. While some larger firms report marginal gains from streamlined processes, the prohibitive initial investment costs act as a primary barrier for SMEs (Alqahtani & Wamba, 2012; Khan et al., 2013), delaying the realisation of long-term cost savings (Li et al., 2010) and validating the financial challenge outlined in the framework.
- Proposition 5 (Supply Chain Augmentation): Vision 2030 is a powerful driver of supply chain augmentation. The national demand for economic modernisation is driving investments in technologies like AI and cloud computing (Alhumaid & Alotaibi, 2025), which are beginning to enhance supply chain agility. However, augmentation is still in its early stages and is limited by the foundational barriers of data silos and skill shortages (Almughthim & Jradi, 2023; Sallam et al., 2023).
7.4. The Enabling Role of Vision 2030
7.5. Summary of Key Challenges and Solutions
8. Contributions
9. Future Research
10. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A

References
- Aastrup, J., Grant, D., & Bjerre, M. (2007). Value creation and category management through retailer–supplier relationships. International Journal of Retail Distribution Management, 17(5), 523–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abogamous, A. H. R. (2022). A theoretical framework for the adoption of web-based learning management systems in Saudi higher educational institution. International Journal of Information Education Technology, 12(7), 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abunar, S. M., Ali, M., Fazelrabbi, M., & Ismail, H. (2016). A study of state of food retail supply chain in Saudi Arabia: A conceptual framework. Engineering Management Research, 5(2), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abunar, S. M., & Zerban, A. M. (2016). Enhancing accounting information systems to facilitate supply chain management between supermarkets/suppliers: The case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Accounting and Marketing, 5(2), 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Aiolfi, S., & Sabbadin, E. (2017). The new paradigm of the omnichannel retailing: Key drivers, new challenges and potential outcomes resulting from the adoption of an omnichannel approach. International Journal of Business Marketing Management, 13(1), 85–109. [Google Scholar]
- Aithal, R. K., Choudhary, V., Maurya, H., Pradhan, D., & Sarkar, D. N. (2023). Factors influencing technology adoption amongst small retailers: Insights from thematic analysis. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 51(1), 81–102. [Google Scholar]
- Akdoğan, A. A., & Demirtaş, Ö. (2014). Managerial role in strategic supply chain management. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 1020–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akoijam, S. L., & Singh, T. S. (2024). Investigating the link between supply chain management practices and supply chain performance in food processing industry. International Journal of Business Excellence, 34(2), 226–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Abdallah, G. M., Abdallah, A. B., & Hamdan, K. (2014). The impact of supplier relationship management on competitive performance of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Business Management, 9(2), 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alahmad, Y. Y. (2021). The relationship between supply chain management practices and supply chain performance in Saudi Arabian firms. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 11(1), 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamri, N., & Alzahrani, S. (2024). Navigating the clouds: An exploratory research of cloud computing adoption in Saudi Arabia’s small and medium enterprises. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(6), 17859–17869. [Google Scholar]
- Alghamdi, F., Sharma, D., & Sathye, M. (2018). Investigating the factors affecting the adoption of cloud computing in SMEs: A case study of Saudi Arabia. In European, mediterranean, and middle eastern conference on information systems (pp. 158–176). Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Alhumaid, M. M., & Alotaibi, I. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence, big data, and their impact on improving marketing effectiveness and customer experience in the retail sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Jazan University Journal of Human Sciences, 2(13), 431–457. [Google Scholar]
- Almughthim, A. M., & Jradi, H. (2023). Nutritional quality of prepackaged foods carrying health or nutritional claims in KSA. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 18(3), 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almutairi, L. A., Althumiri, N. A., Aljadani, R. H., Alkhamis, D., Almarshad, A., Abanmy, A., Alhazmi, M., Aldhewalia, M., Almubark, R., Alqahtani, A. S., & BinDhim, N. F. (2022). Consumer behavior at supermarkets during grocery shopping in Saudi Arabia: A national observational study. Nutrition and Health, 28(1), 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alnahdi, S. (2025). The impact of supply chain management practices in the healthcare domain on customer satisfaction in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(3), 1068–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alqahtani, S., & Wamba, S. F. (2012, January 4–7). Determinants of RFID technology adoption intention in the Saudi retail industry: An empirical study. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4720–4729), Maui, HL, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Alquraish, M. (2025). Digital transformation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability: A comprehensive review with implications for Saudi Arabian manufacturing. Sustainability, 17(10), 4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altayyar, A. (2017). Investigating e-procurement barriers within six Saudi Arabian SMEs. University of Bedfordshire. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148791599.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2025).
- Alzyadat, J. A., & Almuslamani, M. S. (2021). The role of technological progress in the distribution sector: Evidence from Saudi Arabia wholesale and retail trade sector. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(3), 15–23. [Google Scholar]
- An, Y., & Srethapakdi, S. (2006). Order promising/fulfillment and customer/channel collaboration in supply chain management [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. [Google Scholar]
- Angulo, A., Nachtmann, H., & Waller, M. A. (2004). Supply chain information sharing in a vendor managed inventory partnership. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayorinde, O. S. (2024). The effect of supply chain management on firm performance in the fast-moving consumer goods sector of Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 8(1), 394–410. [Google Scholar]
- Bansal, V. (2024). Navigating the consumer goods market in Saudi Arabia—Opportunities for accelerated growth! Field Assist. Available online: https://www.fieldassist.com/blog/navigating-the-consumer-goods-market-in-saudi-arabia-opportunities-for-accelerated-growth/ (accessed on 27 March 2025).
- Barbosa, M. W., Ladeira, M. B., Sousa, P. R. D., & Oliveira, M. P. V. D. (2022). Supply chain collaboration and organisational performance: The effects of big data analytics capabilities, technological dynamism, and competitive intensity. International Journal of Business Environment, 13(4), 358–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benzidia, S., Makaoui, N., & Bentahar, O. (2021). The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabral, I., Grilo, A., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4830–4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çetindamar, D., Çatay, B., & Basmaci, O. S. (2005). Competition through collaboration: Insights from an initiative in the Turkish textile supply chain. Supply Chain Management International Journal, 10(4), 238–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corsten, D., & Kumar, N. (2005). Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? An empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 80–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, R., Allon, G., Bassamboo, A., & van Mieghem, J. A. (2015). Information sharing in supply chains: An empirical and theoretical valuation. Management Science, 61(11), 2803–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirag, O., Xue, W., & Wang, J. (2021). Retailers’ order timing strategies under competition and demand uncertainty. Omega, 101, 102256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dholakia, N., Dholakia, R. R., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). India’s emerging retail systems: Coexistence of tradition and modernity. Journal of Macromarketing, 32(3), 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dupre, K., & Gruen, T. W. (2004). The use of category management practices to obtain a sustainable competitive advantage in the fast-moving consumer-goods industry. Journal of Business Industrial Marketing, 19(7), 444–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2021). Impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning Control, 32(1), 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Free, C. (2007). Supply-chain accounting practices in the UK retail sector: Enabling or coercing collaboration? Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 897–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesan, S., George, M., Jap, S., Palmatier, R. W., & Weitz, B. (2009). Supply chain management and retailer performance: Emerging trends, issues, and implications for research and practice. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesha, H. R., Aithal, P. S., & Kirubadevi, P. (2020). Integrated inventory management control framework. International Journal of Management Technology and Social Sciences, 5(1), 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, L. W., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29(1), 126–153. [Google Scholar]
- Grewal, D., Gauri, D. K., Roggeveen, A. L., & Sethuraman, R. (2021). Strategizing retailing in the new technology era. Journal of Retailing, 97(1), 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Batra, R. (2004). When corporate image affects product evaluations: The moderating role of perceived risk. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hani, J. B. (2022). The influence of supply chain management practices on supply chain performance: The moderating role of information quality. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 20(1), 152–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, T., Liu, W., Shao, X., & Tian, R. G. (2023). Exploring the digital innovation process and outcome in retail platform ecosystems: Disruptive transformation or incremental change. Electronic Commerce Research, 23, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isharyani, M. E., Sopha, B. M., Wibisono, M. A., & Tjahjono, B. (2024). Retail technology adaptation in traditional retailers: A technology-to-performance chain perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, F., Tan, E., Rudolph, J., Crawford, J., & Tan, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education. A protocol paper for a systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivarsson, I., & Alvstam, C. G. (2010). Supplier upgrading in the home-furnishing value chain: An empirical study of IKEA’s sourcing in China and Southeast Asia. World Development, 38(11), 1575–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junejo, D., Khokhar, M., Shah, G. F., & Bhatti, A. A. (2023). Customer satisfaction and standard adoption practices on the sustainable performance of supply chain management: A manufacturing firm case study. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, J., & Kaur, H. V. (2015). Impact of financial leverage on profitability of fast moving consumer goods companies listed on BSE. Asian Journal of Management, 6(4), 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, H. U., Ahmad, S., & Abdollahian, M. (2013, April 15–17). Supply chain technology acceptance, adoption, and possible challenges: A case study of service organizations of Saudi Arabia. 2013 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (pp. 590–595), Las Vegas, NV, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Kurtuluş, M., Ülkü, S., Dotson, J. P., & Nakkaş, A. (2014). The impact of category captainship on the breadth and appeal of a retailer’s assortment. Journal of Retailing, 90(3), 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. E. (2010). Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, S. A., & Bustami, R. (2024). Understanding demand and supply side factors: A cross-sector analysis from Saudi Arabia. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(1), 30–42. [Google Scholar]
- Mauro, A. D., Sestino, A., & Bacconi, A. (2022). Machine learning and artificial intelligence use in marketing: A general taxonomy. Italian Journal of Marketing, 4, 439–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mbhele, T. P. (2014). Antecedents of quality information sharing in the FMCG industry. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(12), 986–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, A., & Panserini, R. C. (2019). Impact of digitalization on category management. In E. Sabri (Ed.), Technology optimization and change management for successful digital supply chains (pp. 169–191). IGI Global. [Google Scholar]
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. The BMJ, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nweje, U., & Taiwo, M. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence for predictive supply chain management, focus on how AI-driven tools are revolutionizing demand forecasting and inventory optimization. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(1), 230–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinzone, M., Fantini, P., Perini, S., Garavaglia, S., Taisch, M., & Miragliotta, G. (2017, September 3–7). Jobs and skills in industry 4.0: An exploratory research. Advances in Production Management Systems: IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference, APMS (pp. 282–288), Chemnitz, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- Piotrowicz, W., & Cuthbertson, R. (2014). Introduction to the special issue information technology in retail: Toward omnichannel retailing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(3–4), 137–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, J., Hu, B., & Meng, C. (2021). Joint innovation investment and pricing decisions in retail supply chains with customer value. Sustainability, 13(3), 1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raman, R., & Selvaraj, M. (2024). Leveraging internet of things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (Al) to optimize supply chain systems. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 13(6), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanathan, U., & Ramanathan, R. (2021). Information sharing and business analytics in global supply chains. In R. Vickerman (Ed.), International encyclopedia of transportation (pp. 71–75). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Roy, S., Das, M., Ali, S. M., Raihan, A. S., Paul, S. K., & Kabir, G. (2020). Evaluating strategies for environmental sustainability in a supply chain of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajja, G. S., Addula, S. R., Meesala, M. K., & Ravipati, P. (2025, June). Optimizing inventory management through AI-driven demand forecasting for improved supply chain responsiveness and accuracy. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 3306, No. 1, p. 050003). AIP Publishing LLC. [Google Scholar]
- Salam, M. A. (2017). The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between technology, trust and operational performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(2), 298–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sallam, K., Mohamed, M., & Mohamed, A. W. (2023). Internet of things (IoT) in supply chain management: Challenges, opportunities, and best practices. Sustainable Machine Intelligence Journal, 2(2), 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlaich, T., & Hoberg, K. (2024). When is the next order? Nowcasting channel inventories with Point-of-Sales data to predict the timing of retail orders. European Journal of Operational Research, 315(1), 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakur, M. S., Lubaba, M., Debnath, B., Bari, A. M., & Rahman, M. A. (2024). Exploring the challenges of industry 4.0 adoption in the FMCG sector: Implications for resilient supply chain in emerging economy. Logistics, 8(1), 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharif, K. (2012). Impact of category management practices on customer satisfaction: Findings from Kuwaiti grocery retail sector. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steiner, R. L. (2000). Category management—A pervasive, new vertical/horizontal format. Antitrust, 15, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Team Omniful. (2023, October 10). Supply chain collaboration: Aligning retailers, suppliers, carriers & 3PL. OmniFul. Available online: https://www.omniful.ai/blog/supply-chain-collaboration-aligning-retailers-suppliers-carriers-3pl (accessed on 15 March 2025).
- Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarlagadda, K. C. (2025). AI-powered supply chain optimization: Enhancing demand forecasting and logistics. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(4), 792–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M., & Huang, Z. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance: The role of supply chain resilience. Sustainability, 16(17), 7621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Key Words | Related Terms Used in the Search |
|---|---|
| Category management | ‘category management’ OR ‘retail assortment planning’ OR ‘product categorisation’ |
| Technology integration | ‘technology adoption’ OR ‘digital transformation’ OR ‘data analytics’ OR ‘IoT in retail’ |
| Retailer–supplier relationships | ‘retailer–supplier partnership’ OR ‘vertical collaboration’ OR ‘supply chain integration’ |
| Author(s) (Year) | Country of Study | Method | Key Findings | Relevance to CM in Saudi FMCG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aastrup et al. (2007) | Denmark (EU) | Conceptual framework | The retailer–supplier partnership process is linked to CM as a strategic, advantageous foresight. | Provides a foundational global model for collaboration, emphasising the importance of shared decision-making. |
| Abogamous (2022) | Saudi Arabia | Empirical study | Cultural hesitancy and organisational silos are key barriers to information sharing. | Directly relevant. Emphasises a critical, culturally rooted implementation barrier unique to the Saudi context. |
| Abunar and Zerban (2016) | Saudi Arabia | Case study and survey | IT and cloud computing play key roles in improving supply chain management activities, although there is a lack of access to market insights. | Directly relevant. Provides empirical evidence for both the technological potential and data accessibility challenges within Saudi Arabia. |
| Alahmad (2021) | Saudi Arabia | Review and conceptual study | Operational inefficiencies like stockouts are a virtue of data deficiency in retail. | Directly relevant. Contextualises the consequences of poor data sharing for Saudi retailers specifically. |
| Almughthim and Jradi (2023) | Saudi Arabia | Empirical study | There are challenges related to data accessibility, and there is a need for standardised data protocols. | Directly relevant. Addresses key technical and governance gaps that must be solved for effective CM in Saudi Arabia. |
| Alqahtani and Wamba (2012) | Saudi Arabia | Survey | Underdeveloped IT infrastructure is a significant barrier to technological adoption. | Directly relevant. Provides evidence for the ‘technological gaps’ challenge in the Saudi market. |
| Cui et al. (2015) | USA | Quantitative model | Data sharing is pivotal for driving consumer satisfaction and sales growth in retailer–supplier partnerships. | Provides a global theoretical basis for the value of data transparency, which Saudi partnerships can aspire to achieve. |
| Fatorachian and Kazemi (2021) | Global | SLR | Technology facilitates inventory control, demand forecasting, accurate replenishment, and data exchange. | Offers a comprehensive view of adopting technologies (AI, IoT, blockchain) relevant to modernising Saudi Arabia’s FMCG sector. |
| Ganesan et al. (2009) | USA | Empirical study | Retailers focusing on the consumer thought process via CM achieve higher sales growth and profitability. | Validates the global benefits of a consumer-centric CM approach, which is the goal for Saudi retailers. |
| Grewal et al. (2021) | USA with a global focus | Conceptual review | Retailer–supplier partnerships thrive when there is a synergy between technological integration and data sharing. | Establishes a global connection between the core variables of the study (CM, technology, data). |
| Ivarsson and Alvstam (2010) | Sweden and Singapore | Case study | Standardised protocols are needed for data security to foster trust in collaborative partnerships. | Emphasises the universal need for data governance, a critical requirement for overcoming hesitancy in Saudi Arabia. |
| Kurtuluş et al. (2014) | USA | Field experiment | CM is key to understanding consumer needs and optimising pricing, promotion, and product placement. | Provides empirical evidence for the role of CM in assortment planning, a key component of this study’s framework. |
| Mbhele (2014) | South Africa | Case study | Integrated IT infrastructure and top management support are key antecedents for quality information sharing. | Offers insights from another emerging market into the prerequisites for successful data sharing in SCM. |
| Barrier Category | Challenge | Literature-Supported Solution | Supporting Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cultural and Relational | Hesitancy to share data due to organisational silos and a lack of trust. | Implement phased technological integration to demonstrate quick wins and build trust. Foster a culture of transparency through joint training programmes that focus on mutual benefits. | Abogamous (2022); Ivarsson and Alvstam (2010); Aastrup et al. (2007) |
| Financial | High technological adoption and implementation costs, especially for SMEs. | Prioritise low-cost, high-impact cloud-based solutions (e.g., SaaS platforms) over large-scale custom systems. Advocate for government or joint venture subsidies aligned with Vision 2030 goals. | Alqahtani and Wamba (2012); Khan et al. (2013); Almutairi et al. (2022) |
| Technological and Infrastructural | Underdeveloped IT infrastructure and a lack of skilled personnel. | Invest in standardised application programming interface integrations to connect existing systems. Partner with technology providers to deliver training and capacity-building programmes to address skill shortages. | Fatorachian and Kazemi (2021); Almughthim and Jradi (2023); Sallam et al. (2023) |
| Governance | A lack of standardised data protocols, leading to security and confidentiality concerns. | Develop industry-wide data governance frameworks that define ownership, security, and usage protocols to build confidence in data sharing. | Ivarsson and Alvstam (2010); Almughthim and Jradi (2023) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alyafie, K. The Efficacy of Technological Integration and Data Sharing in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Category Management in Retailer–Supplier Partnerships. Businesses 2025, 5, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses5040048
Alyafie K. The Efficacy of Technological Integration and Data Sharing in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Category Management in Retailer–Supplier Partnerships. Businesses. 2025; 5(4):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses5040048
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlyafie, Khulud. 2025. "The Efficacy of Technological Integration and Data Sharing in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Category Management in Retailer–Supplier Partnerships" Businesses 5, no. 4: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses5040048
APA StyleAlyafie, K. (2025). The Efficacy of Technological Integration and Data Sharing in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Category Management in Retailer–Supplier Partnerships. Businesses, 5(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses5040048

