Next Article in Journal
Response Surface Optimization and Microstructural Characterization of OPC–Fly Ash–GGBS Stabilized Pond Ash for Sustainable Geotechnical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Construction of Building Envelopes Using Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Rubberized Concrete: The Case of Jordan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

From Passivity Breakdown to Brittle Failure: Stress Corrosion Cracking in Prestressed Concrete—A Review

1
Hassania School of Public Works, Oasis, Casablanca BP 8108, Morocco
2
National School of Architecture of Fès, Parc Fès-Shore, Fès 30000, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Constr. Mater. 2026, 6(5), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater6050058
Submission received: 27 July 2026 / Revised: 19 August 2026 / Accepted: 28 August 2026 / Published: 2 September 2026

Abstract

Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of prestressing steel threatens prestressed concrete structures with sudden, brittle failure and minimal visible warning. While mechanical stress, localized corrosion, and hydrogen uptake are recognized drivers, the mechanisms connecting sulfide exposure in cementitious materials to hydrogen uptake and crack initiation at the steel–concrete interface remain poorly understood. This review synthesizes the coupled electrochemical, mechanical, metallurgical, and environmental processes governing SCC, with particular emphasis on the interactions of sulfide species with chloride ingress, carbonation, pitting, and hydrogen-assisted cracking under sustained tensile stress. Evidence indicates that sulfides weaken passive-film protectiveness and facilitate hydrogen entry, while localized corrosion and acidification create favorable conditions for crack initiation and propagation. Because SCC susceptibility emerges from the combined effects of environmental exposure, steel microstructure, and mechanical loading, isolated environmental parameters cannot adequately predict risk. Accelerated laboratory tests offer comparative insight but have limited representativeness of the complex conditions of prestressed concrete. A critical gap persists: no quantitative relationship has yet been established between cement sulfide content, sulfide availability at the steel surface, hydrogen uptake, and actual SCC susceptibility. Bridging this gap requires service-representative experiments on stressed prestressing steel embedded in mortar or concrete to develop reliable durability criteria and move beyond precautionary regulatory limits.
Keywords: stress corrosion cracking (SCC); prestressing steel; prestressed concrete; hydrogen embrittlement; sulfide ions; chloride-induced corrosion stress corrosion cracking (SCC); prestressing steel; prestressed concrete; hydrogen embrittlement; sulfide ions; chloride-induced corrosion

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaafri, R.; Salami, Y. From Passivity Breakdown to Brittle Failure: Stress Corrosion Cracking in Prestressed Concrete—A Review. Constr. Mater. 2026, 6, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater6050058

AMA Style

Jaafri R, Salami Y. From Passivity Breakdown to Brittle Failure: Stress Corrosion Cracking in Prestressed Concrete—A Review. Construction Materials. 2026; 6(5):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater6050058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaafri, Reda, and Younes Salami. 2026. "From Passivity Breakdown to Brittle Failure: Stress Corrosion Cracking in Prestressed Concrete—A Review" Construction Materials 6, no. 5: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater6050058

APA Style

Jaafri, R., & Salami, Y. (2026). From Passivity Breakdown to Brittle Failure: Stress Corrosion Cracking in Prestressed Concrete—A Review. Construction Materials, 6(5), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater6050058

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop