Previous Article in Journal
Abdominal Subcutaneous Dirofilariasis Due to Dirofilaria repens in a 34-Year-Old Sicilian Woman: Diagnostic Challenges and Molecular Confirmation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Monthly and Daily Dynamics of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Muscidae) in Livestock Farms of the Batna Region (Northeastern Algeria)

by
Chaimaa Azzouzi
1,2,†,
Mehdi Boucheikhchoukh
1,2,*,†,
Noureddine Mechouk
3,*,
Scherazad Sedraoui
2 and
Safia Zenia
4,5
1
Biodiversity and Ecosystems Pollution Laboratory, Faculty of Life and Nature Sciences, Chadli Bendjedid University, El Tarf 36000, Algeria
2
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Chadli Bendjedid University, El Tarf 36000, Algeria
3
Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Higher National Veterinary School (ENSV), El Harrach, Algiers 16004, Algeria
5
Laboratory for Fundamental Computer Science, Operations Research, Combinatorics and Econometrics, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene, Algiers 16111, Algeria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Parasitologia 2025, 5(4), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040052
Submission received: 10 July 2025 / Revised: 18 September 2025 / Accepted: 29 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025

Abstract

Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) is a hematophagous fly species of veterinary importance, known for its negative effects on animal health and productivity. The stress caused by their painful bites results in losses in milk and meat production. Despite its impact, data on its ecology and activity in Algeria are lacking. Such knowledge is needed to evaluate its potential effects on livestock production and rural health, and to support surveillance, outbreak prediction, and control strategies. This study aimed to investigate the monthly and daily dynamics of S. calcitrans in livestock farms in the Batna region and evaluate the influence of climatic factors on its abundance. From July 2022 to July 2023, Vavoua traps were placed monthly from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on four farms in the Batna region, representing different livestock types. Captured flies were identified, sexed, and counted every two hours. Climatic data were collected both in situ and from NASA POWER datasets. Fly abundance was analyzed using non-parametric statistics, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis. A total of 1244 S. calcitrans were captured, mainly from cattle farms. Activity occurred from August to December, with a peak in September. Males were more abundant and exhibited a bimodal activity in September. Fly abundance was positively correlated with temperature and precipitation and negatively correlated with wind speed and humidity. This study presents the first ecological data on S. calcitrans in northeastern Algeria, highlighting its seasonal dynamics and the climatic drivers that influence it. The results highlight the species’ preference for cattle and indicate that temperature and rainfall are key factors influencing its abundance. These findings lay the groundwork for targeted control strategies against this neglected pest in Algeria.

1. Background

Blood-sucking Diptera members of the Stomoxyinae subfamily are commonly associated with livestock, wildlife, and occasionally humans worldwide [1,2,3]. Within this subfamily, the Stomoxys genus comprises 18 species, most of which are found in the Afrotropical region [4,5]. Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) or “the stable fly”, the only cosmopolitan species, is recognized worldwide as a real economic and welfare threat to livestock in confined environments [6,7]. It affects a wide range of hosts, including cattle, horses, donkeys, poultry, dogs, and pigs. Its painful bites cause skin lesions and bleeding, resulting in discomfort, reduced grazing time, and, ultimately, losses in milk yield and weight gain [8,9,10]. Various abiotic factors can influence the seasonal and diurnal activity of these day-biting flies [11,12]. However, they are more active when starving and prefer feeding on the lower part of their host’s legs [13,14].
Due to their economic impact, several studies have been interested in the biology, genome, and vector role of S. calcitrans [3,15,16,17,18]. Indeed, as both sexes are hematophagous, stable flies were suspected to be potential vectors of several pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, helminths, and protozoa [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Recent studies have highlighted their capacity to transmit LSDV (Lumpy Skin Disease Virus) even from subclinical animals, and the outcome of this pathogen was influenced by the presence of S. calcitrans [23,25].
A wide range of control strategies, including traps, sticky traps, chemicals, and other modern and eco-friendly tools, have been tested against stable flies [26,27,28,29]. However, due to the adaptive behavior of S. calcitrans, the most effective control method remains a topic of discussion. For instance, evidence of sticky-trap avoidance in response to trapped flies was recently reported [30].
Few data are available on the population dynamics of S. calcitrans in North Africa. Most published works have been conducted in Europe [7,31], Asia [32], South America [33], and recently in Africa (Cameroon and Tunisia) [11,12], which underscores the growing interest in this fly species in Africa. Nevertheless, more extensive investigations have been conducted on Réunion Island and in the USA [34,35,36].
Despite being a major problem in veterinary medicine, published research on this fly species in Algeria is scarce. The only available works focused on the diversity, seasonal dynamics, and, more recently, the vector role of other genera of biting flies and midges, such as Culicoides (Latreille, 1809) ceratopogonidae, Hippobosca, Melophagus (Linnaeus, 1758) Hippoboscidae, Phlebotomus (Rondani, 1840) Psychodidae, Simulium (Linnaeus, 1758) Simulidae, and Tabanus (Linnaeus, 1758) Tabanidae [37,38,39,40,41]. Therefore, data about the ecology and the monthly and daily activities of the S. calcitrans population in Algeria must be provided. For this purpose, a one-year survey has been conducted to determine the dynamics of these flies in the country and clarify the main climatic factors that influence their behavior.

2. Methods

2.1. Animals and Study Area

Four farms have been selected for the current study. They are located in the Batna region (northeastern Algeria). This region is characterized by a semiarid climate with very cold winters and hot summers [42]. Although the selected farms do not represent the entire Batna region, they were randomly chosen from a list provided by the regional veterinary inspection office, then filtered based on logistical feasibility. This selection method aimed to ensure practical data collection while maintaining a degree of statistical rigor. Future studies should consider a larger number of farms to enhance the representativeness of the findings.
The prospected farms included two dairy cattle farms, an equestrian farm, and a small ruminant farm (Figure 1). During the study, the animals received no insecticide treatments to protect them from insect bites. Additionally, the owners stated that they do not have a customary practice of using insecticides to control flies on their farms, ensuring that no residual effects of these products would interfere with the study’s results.
The first dairy cattle farm is located in Timgad, more precisely in Ain Abderrahmane village (35°26′11.5″ N 6°31′1.1″ E). Spread over an area of 3.8 km2, it comprises 400 cows with a capacity of 1400 cows. The second dairy farm is located in Boumia (35°41′56.5″ N 6°29′55.3″ E), smaller than the first, with approximately 100 cattle and other small ruminants. The equestrian farm is located in Ayoun Laasafer village (35°35′18.3″ N 6°20′34.1″ E) and has more than 20 horses. The small ruminants farm is a traditional farm located in Oued Taga (35°26′11.5″ N 6°26′49.5″ E) with approximately 70 heads, most of which are sheep, a few goats, and other farmyard animals.

2.2. Flies Trapping

In this study, Vavoua traps (Laveissière and Grébaut, 1990) were used to capture fly species around the animals, specifically Stomoxys calcitrans flies. The fieldwork and trap installation were conducted after obtaining verbal consent from the animal owners and authorization from the local ethics committee at Chadli Bendjedid El Tarf University.
Vavoua traps consist of three blue and black screens arranged at 120°, surmounted by a white mosquito-net cone, which is itself topped with a capture box containing a water–sugar mixture used to retain the attracted flies [43].
Trapping was conducted monthly from July 2022 to July 2023. Once every month, a Vavoua trap was placed on each farm from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., 5 to 10 m from the stabling area and 30 to 50 cm above the ground. Each farm was surveyed on a different day each month, ensuring that no more than one farm was monitored on the same day. Additionally, the position of the traps on each farm remained consistent throughout the entire study period.
During the trapping days, the catching box on top of the Vavoua trap was emptied every two hours. The trapped flies were collected at 8 a.m., 10 a.m., 12 p.m., 2 p.m., 4 p.m., and 6 p.m. and stored in plastic jars containing 70% ethanol. The containers were identified by their farm, date, and collection time.
Initially, fly trapping was conducted on four farms, including the Boumia cattle farm. However, no individuals were captured in this location, likely due to environmental or ecological factors affecting their presence. We focused our monthly and daily dynamics assessment on the two farms that yielded stable fly captures, ensuring a meaningful analysis. This decision was made to provide reliable data rather than include farms where no stable flies were detected. Two farms were monitored continuously throughout the year to assess their dynamics: the Timgad cattle farm (from August 2022 to July 2023) and the Oued Taga small ruminants farm (from July 2022 to June 2023). The trapping data used in the statistical analysis for this study are exclusively from these two farms, as they provided the most complete and usable datasets.

2.3. Flies Identification and Data Analysis

Collected flies were identified under a Jeulin® binocular lens (Jeulin, Évreux, France). S. calcitrans flies were identified according to the Zumpt identification key [44,45]. For every collection hour, the total number of flies of all species combined, the total number of S. calcitrans, and the number of males and females of S. calcitrans were counted. The abundance of S. calcitrans was estimated by calculating the fly density per trap per day (FDT). This calculation standardizes the number of captured flies, allowing for a more accurate comparison of fly populations across different trapping efforts. The following formula was applied for this purpose [11]:
F D T =   T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   c a p t u r e d   S . c a l c i t r a n s   T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   t r a p s × T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   t r a p p i n g   d a y s
All the data regarding the stable fly catches and abiotic factors, including the total number of flies, counts of S. calcitrans (categorized by males and females), as well as the average temperature, precipitation, wind speed, and relative humidity recorded every two hours on the trapping days, were recorded into an Excel database (Microsoft Corporation) (Supplementary Materials). These data were then processed and analyzed using SPSS statistical software, version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0, Armonk, NY, USA, IBM Corp). Before conducting statistical analyses, the normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. As the data did not follow a normal distribution, non-parametric methods were applied. Specifically, the Kruskal–Wallis test (ANOVA) was used to compare the abundance of S.calcitrans between farms.
Additionally, Spearman’s correlation was performed to assess the relationship between S. calcitrans abundance and each of the climatic parameters. Multiple regression analysis was also performed using a statistical model with the Huber-White-Hinkley method to test the influence of all climatic variables on the abundance of S. calcitrans, using EViews® software (12, Copyright© 1994–2020 IH5 Global Inc., Englewood, CO, USA). All these steps were taken to ensure the validity of our statistical approach.

2.4. Climatic Data

The temperature, humidity, precipitation, and wind speed for each trapping day were initially obtained online from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Langley Research Center (LaRC) Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resource (POWER) Project, which is funded through the NASA Earth Science/Applied Science Program [46]. The average measurement was taken for each two-hour retrieved parameters. These data were then compared with those obtained in situ using mini-climatic stations installed on each farm. The average of the two measures, online and in situ, were used for statistical data analysis.

3. Results

3.1. S.calcitrans Abundance

Overall, the Vavoua traps allowed us to capture 3205 flies in all the prospected farms. Among them, 1244 (38.81%) trapped flies in the Timgad cattle, and Oued Taga small ruminant farms were identified as S. calcitrans. Other fly species were trapped in these farms, including Tabanus spp., Haematobia irritans, and Musca domestica. However, no specimens of S. calcitrans were caught by the horses and Boumia cattle farms’ traps. Nevertheless, the Vavoua traps installed there succeeded in spotting other flying insect species, such as bees (Apis mellifera), bee flies (Bombylius spp.), cuckoo wasps (Chrysis ignita), cicada (Cicada orni), and butterflies. Macrocheles spp. parasitoid mites were observed on the abdomens of some stable flies trapped between October and December. The number of stable flies trapped in each of the surveyed farms is detailed in Figure 2.
The overall abundance of S. calcitrans in the study region was 20.06 FDT (±30.85 S. calcitrans/trap/day). These fly species were more abundant in the cattle farm (FDT = 68.35 ± 14.78 S. calcitrans/trap/day) than in the small ruminant farm (FDT = 5.86 ± 5.08 S. calcitrans/trap/day) (Table 1).

3.2. S. calcitrans Activity

The monitoring of the overall monthly activity of all the farms combined showed that the stable flies were active in the Batna region from August to December, corresponding to the late summer season until early winter. Their abundance increased gradually and peaked in early fall (September). Then, it progressively decreased until it disappeared in early December.
In addition, females had a very low abundance compared to males, who reached their peak activity in September. In contrast, no stable flies were trapped during winter and early spring (Figure 3). During the main active months, S. calcitrans flies started to be trapped around 8–10 a.m., and an average peak of captures was reached between 10 and 12 p.m. before declining towards the afternoon (Figure 4).
The figure shows monthly activity of Stomoxys calcitrans in the Batna region during a one-year survey. Monthly survey using Vavoua traps and fly density per trap calculation showed that stable flies were active between August and December, with a peak activity in September.
Each two-hour stable fly collection for each month is represented in the graph. S. calcitrans males exhibited a bimodal daily activity pattern in the high activity (September) between 8–12 p.m. and 4–6 p.m., and a unimodal activity pattern in the remaining months. While females had always a unimodal activity and were active between 12 and 2 p.m. in their high activity (November). In September, the S. calcitrans males had an almost bimodal (two peaks) activity pattern and were more active from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Their number decreased significantly between 12 p.m. and 2 p.m., then rose again to reach a peak between 4 and 6 p.m., similar to the one observed earlier between 8 a.m. and 12 p.m. The male activity was extended from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. in October and November.
Although they were trapped with lower numbers (FDT ≤ 6 S. calcitrans/trap/day) than males, the few females were trapped in November and December between 12 p.m. and 2 p.m. During the remaining months, no significant activity was recorded for either males or females (Figure 4).

3.3. S. calcitrans Abundance Among Farms

The abundance of S. calcitrans differed between the two surveyed farms. A slight but significant difference has been observed (p ≤ 0.05). For instance, in the cattle farm, the stable fly activity extended from September to December, corresponding to the fall season, and the peak was reached in September, while in the small ruminant farm, the S. calcitrans activity was shifted to October until December, with a peak of abundance in October (Figure 5). In addition, during the high-activity months, stable flies had the same daily activity peak in both farms (10 a.m. to 12 p.m.) (Figure 6). Females were captured in the two farms with low numbers (FDT ≤ 5 Stomoxys/trap/day). Therefore, no abundance peaks were recorded during the study, and the comparison of the monthly and daily dynamics according to the fly sex between the two farms could not be assessed.
This figure compares the monthly variation in S. calcitrans in the two surveyed farms; a slight difference in the peak activity has been observed: stable flies were active in September in the Timgad cattle farm, while they were more active in October in the small ruminant farm.

3.4. Influence of Climatic Factors

Spearman rank correlation showed that only temperature and precipitation were positively correlated with the stable fly catches (p ≤ 0.05). It also showed a negative and non-significant correlation between the number of tapped S. calcitrans and the remaining climatic factors (Table 2). On the other hand, the results of the multiple regression analysis showed that all the climatic parameters significantly influenced the number of stable flies (R2 = 0.065). The model showed that when the temperature rises by one Degree, the number of stable flies increases by 0.9. Overall, an average fall temperature of 29 °C, light precipitation of 0.024 mm, and relative humidity of 33.6% favored the fly activity peak (Table 3, Figure 7). However, wind speed had a negative effect on the number of flies caught, with the catch decreasing by approximately two flies for every one m/s increase in wind speed. Similarly, the peak activity of S. calcitrans flies was observed when wind speed decreased.
The figure represents the influence of different environmental parameters on the S. calcitrans density. Each environmental measurement is represented separately with the overall stable fly monthly activity; this one is strongly influenced positively by temperature and negatively by wind speed.

4. Discussion

Due to their impact on animal health, welfare, and productivity, several studies worldwide have investigated the dynamics of stable flies [7,11,12,47]. Recent studies on the abundance, biodiversity, and dynamics of flying vectors in Algeria have been limited to mosquitoes, midges, and a few fly species [41,48,49]. Nonetheless, stable flies have never been investigated in the country. The current study presents preliminary findings on the dynamics and abiotic factors influencing their activity in Algeria. It also compared the abundance of these flies in two farm types, trying to determine a probable host species preference. The Batna region was selected for this study due to its characteristic semiarid climate, which is representative of some parts of northeastern Algeria. However, we acknowledge that it does not encompass the full climatic and ecological diversity of the entire northeastern region. Further research should be conducted in additional locations to account for potential regional variations in stable fly dynamics.
This survey identified 1244/3205 (38.81%) of the collected flies as S. calcitrans. A more significant number of these fly species was collected in other studies in Tunisia and Slovakia [10,12]. The difference in the number of trapped stable flies could be related to the type and the quantity of installed traps. In our study, a single Vavoua trap was installed on each farm. The effectiveness of these traps in capturing S. calcitrans flies has already been highlighted [35,50,51]. However, even if this trap was reported as the most efficient for capturing S. calcitrans [50], adhesive traps could also be very effective, as previously emphasized [10,52]. Additionally, our survey reported that stable fly abundance was higher on cattle farms than on small ruminant farms. These findings may indicate a preference and attractiveness of S. calcitrans to cattle hosts and are consistent with previously reported results where more stable flies were caught on a cattle farm than in zoos [53,54].
Furthermore, recent studies have identified cow manure as an optimal substrate for the development of S. calcitrans larvae [55]. In addition, the breath of livestock has been shown to attract host-seeking stable flies, with their attraction being further influenced by skin-associated bacteria on the cows [56,57]. The number of hosts present at each farm may also explain this difference. The Timgad cattle farm, which has the largest cattle population among all the surveyed farms, with 400 head of cattle, likely contributes to the higher number of stable flies observed. Recent studies have suggested that herd size and the presence of older cows may influence the abundance of stable flies. However, the underlying mechanisms behind these associations have not yet been clearly explained [10,58]. It should be noted that the Timgad cattle farm is a dairy farm, and most of its cows are mature; this could explain the higher number of stable flies trapped there. No Stomoxys flies were trapped in the current study in the horse stable or the Boumia cattle farm. Wasps (Hymenoptera) and the parasitoids were highly abundant on the Boumia cattle farm, which may be a reason for the absence of stable flies, especially since several species of wasps have been reported as natural predators of S. calcitrans and an efficient biological control method against them [26,29].
The number of trapped flies was significantly lower in the small ruminant farm compared to that obtained in the Timgad cattle farm. This low number may be explained by the behavior of S. calcitrans gravid females, which avoids depositing their eggs on substrates containing conspecific larvae because their presence adversely affects hatching time [59]. In our case, conspecific species, such as Musca domestica (Linnaeus, 1758), were found among the flies collected at the small ruminant farm, which may explain the low number of stable flies on this farm.
The key limitations of this study were the inclusion of only one cattle farm and one small ruminant farm for comparative analysis, as well as the location where the traps were installed. Due to logistical constraints, we were unable to incorporate multiple farms per category. The traps were installed near livestock farms because stable flies directly threaten animal health and productivity in these environments. While other habitats, such as grazing areas, grasslands, and forests, may also be sites of choice for trapping, our study aimed to assess the immediate impact of these flies on farm animals.
While our findings offer valuable preliminary insights, future studies should aim to include a larger number of farms within each category and, ideally, select sites that host both cattle and small ruminants to enhance comparative analysis. Additionally, further investigations could explore the presence and activity of stable flies across diverse ecosystems to provide a more comprehensive understanding of their distribution and ecological dynamics. Overall, these findings would serve as a model for future longer-term research.
The current study demonstrated that climatic conditions influenced the abundance of S. calcitrans throughout the year. A single peak of activity was observed in September, corresponding to the end of summer. These findings are similar to those reported in northern and tropical regions, where a single peak or unimodal activity of S. calcitrans populations has been observed [60,61,62,63]. However, a similar study in Tunisia reported two activity peaks from March to July and November to January [12]. These divergences could be explained by the difference in altitude between the two study regions. In addition, climate change may be another reason for these findings: our region recorded unusually wet summers and dry periods for the remaining seasons, which could lead the stable flies to exhibit tropical-like behavior. The bimodal pattern of S. calcitrans was often described in warm regions of the world, such as Cameroon and southwestern France [11,31]. At the same time, unimodal behavior was reported in northern and tropical regions [10,60,62].
Overall, it is undeniable that climatic conditions have a significant influence on stable fly activity worldwide. For instance, in the USA, S. calcitrans flies were reported throughout the year, with a seasonal peak in spring [36]. Similarly, in Alberta, Canada, as in our study, a single peak of activity was recorded in September [60]. These flies were more abundant in England during the summer, with peaks in late August and September [7]. In contrast, an extended activity from July to October, with a peak in August, was highlighted in Thailand [53]. These climatic factors, mainly the temperature, affect fecundity, oviposition, and larval and pupal development [64,65,66].
Our study found a strong and positive correlation between S. calcitrans abundance and temperature, similar to that in Brazil [33]. The peak abundance of S. calcitrans was observed in September at an average temperature of 29 °C, which falls within the temperature range required for growth, size increase, and survival by S. calcitrans populations [62,67]. Furthermore, a significant relationship was observed between temperature and the developmental rate of each life stage of stable flies when temperatures ranged between 15 °C and 30 °C. Development times were significantly shorter at 25 °C and 30 °C, decreasing with each five-degree increase within this range. However, development time increased at temperatures above 30 °C, such as 35 °C, suggesting a threshold where higher temperatures slow development [67]. The gradual decrease in the number of stable flies from September until their disappearance in January could be associated with lower temperatures and the presence of natural enemies and predators [62].
On the other hand, a significant reduction in the survival of S. calcitrans was observed at 35 °C, which caused pupal mortality [67]. We could assume that this temperature has triggered the decreasing phase of the stable flies in our study. In addition, Macrochelid parasitoid mites associated with stable flies trapped during this period could be incriminated as a limiting factor, as highlighted by previous studies [68,69].
Alongside temperature, 70% relative humidity can have a significant effect by increasing the number of pupating and emerging larvae [64]. Despite the low R2 and adjusted R2 values, the multiple regression analysis confirmed a positive correlation between stable fly numbers and relative humidity. These findings suggest that other environmental factors, such as light and its intensity, quality of stable bedding, presence of different animal species, hygiene, and ventilation, may also influence fly abundance. Further models could be generated to identify the key factors influencing stable fly populations. Nevertheless, the Spearman rank correlation revealed a negative correlation between S. calcitrans sex and relative humidity.
Several studies in Thailand, Cameroon, Ethiopia, and Nebraska have highlighted the positive impact of precipitation on S. calcitrans activity [11,53,63,70,71]. However, in our case, an abundance peak was recorded during a period of low rainfall. It could be hypothesized that as long as the relative humidity was sufficient to humidify the oviposition sites, a peak of activity was recorded, especially since humid oviposition sites can attract gravid stable fly females and encourage their propensity to lay eggs [72]. On the other hand, increased rainfall expands the availability of suitable breeding sites, which are essential for egg hatching and the survival and successful development of larvae into pupae and adults [73].
Regarding the effect of wind speed, we reported a negative correlation between this parameter and the number of caught stable flies, thus suggesting that wind does not affect fly captures. However, recent studies have shown that higher wind speeds lead to increased captures, with a peak in activity occurring when the wind speed is ideal [7,11].
Monitoring the daily activity of the stable flies showed that males were more abundant than females. The sex ratio may vary depending on the season and climatic conditions. For instance, at the beginning of the wet season in Kenya, the sex ratio was very clearly in favor of females. It became balanced as soon as the first generation emerged during the rainy season. After that, the number of females exploded [74]. The daily activity monitoring also showed a bimodal pattern in September, with a large peak of activity from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. and then from 4 to 6 p.m. This peak became unimodal in October and was limited between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m.
Nevertheless, a unimodal daily pattern was recently described in Tunisia under a Mediterranean semiarid climate [12]. It is essential to note that air and substrate temperature, humidity, and solar radiation can significantly impact the development of immature instars, as previously emphasized [10,75]. In addition, the feeding behavior of stable flies can influence their daily activity. For instance, when S. calcitrans flies adopted a hematophagous behavior, the daily activity was increased. In contrast, it decreased when they adopted a sugar-feeding behavior [76]. This behavior may also explain the differences in the daily activity of stable flies observed between the two monitored farms. The cattle farm had minimal vegetation, whereas agricultural activities, including apple and fig orchards, as well as vegetable gardens, were present in the small ruminant farm. These plants likely provided a source of sugar for the stable flies, which in turn influenced their activity patterns.
The current study represents the first investigation in Algeria on the seasonal and daily dynamics of stable flies. It provides compelling evidence of the attractiveness of these pests to cattle hosts and their presence in the vicinity of small ruminants. Additionally, our findings confirm the highly seasonal nature of stable flies in the Batna region, characterized by a unimodal peak in autumn and an activity strongly influenced by climatic conditions, especially temperature and rainfall.
The limitations of this study include its restriction to a single year, which may not fully capture interannual variability. Multi-year replication would provide greater confidence in the results. Trap captures may also have been influenced by chemical cues, causing avoidance of traps with conspecifics or heterospecifics. Nevertheless, these findings provide valuable baseline information on stable fly ecology in Algeria and form a foundation for future multi-year investigations addressing both seasonal dynamics and potential trap-related biases.
Overall, identifying the high-risk activity periods of these flies alongside the use of natural predators could be highly recommended as an essential alternative to using chemicals to protect animals from stable fly bites and potential disease transmission. Further field investigations on the distribution of stable flies and molecular surveys on their potential vector role can represent a first step in developing an integrated control strategy for these pests in Algeria.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/parasitologia5040052/s1, File S1: Data.

Author Contributions

C.A. and M.B.: Conceptualization, fieldwork, methodology, writing—original draft; N.M. and S.S.: Data analysis, writing—original draft and manuscript review; S.Z.: Statistical analysis, and manuscript review; M.B. and C.A.: Project supervision and resources; N.M. and M.B.: Manuscript finalization and overall study design. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Moreki, J.C.; Tjinyeka, K.; Makore, J.; Tlotleng, K.; Moseki, M.I. The impact of stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans L.) on small stock production in Bodibeng, Bothatogo and Sehithwa in the North West district, Botswana; a survey study. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 2022, 12, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chalchisa, A.; Kumsa, B.; Gutema Wegi, F. Biting Flies and Associated Pathogens in Camels in Amibara District of Afar Region, Ethiopia. Vet. Med. Int. 2024, 2024, 5407898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rochon, K.; Hogsette, J.; Kaufman, P.; Olafson, P.; Swiger, S.; Taylor, D. Stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae)—Biology, management, and research needs. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2021, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Duvallet, G.; Hogsette, J.A. Global Diversity, Distribution, and Genetic Studies of Stable Flies (Stomoxys sp.). Diversity 2023, 15, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dsouli-Aymes, N.; Michaux, J.; De Stordeur, E.; Couloux, A.; Veuille, M.; Duvallet, G. Global population structure of the stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans) inferred by mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abbas, K.H.; Alfatlawi, M.; Ali, M. Pests of Livestock: I-Stomoxys calcitrans (Insecta: Diptera: Muscidae) (Stable fly). HIV Nurs. 2022, 22, 1237–1240. [Google Scholar]
  7. Parravani, A.; Chivers, C.A.; Bell, N.; Long, S.; Burden, F.; Wall, R. Seasonal abundance of the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans in southwest England. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2019, 33, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Campbell, J.; Skoda, S.; Berkebile, D.; Boxler, D.; Thomas, G.; Adams, D.; Davis, R. Effects of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on weight gains of grazing yearling cattle. J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 94, 780–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. González, M.A.; Bravo-Barriga, D.; Fernández, E.B.; Frontera, E.; Ruiz-Arrondo, I. Severe Skin lesions caused by persistent bites of the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) in a donkey sanctuary of Western Spain. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 116, 104056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Semelbauer, M.; Mangová, B.; Barta, M.; Kozánek, M. The factors influencing seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution of stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera, Muscidae) within stables. Insects 2018, 9, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lendzele, S.S.; François, M.J.; Roland, Z.-K.C.; Armel, K.A.; Duvallet, G. Factors influencing seasonal and daily dynamics of the genus Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762 (Diptera: Muscidae), in the Adamawa Plateau, Cameroon. Int. J. Zool. 2019, 2019, 3636943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khalifa, A.; Nasr, Z.; Errouissi, F. First data on the daily and seasonal activity patterns of Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) under Mediterranean semiarid climate in a dairy cattle farm in Tunisia. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2022, 42, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schofield, S.; Brady, J. Circadian activity pattern in the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans. Physiol. Entomol. 1996, 21, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Showler, A.T.; Osbrink, W.L. Stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.), dispersal and governing factors. Int. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 7, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Olafson, P.U.; Aksoy, S.; Attardo, G.M.; Buckmeier, G.; Chen, X.; Coates, C.J.; Davis, M.; Dykema, J.; Emrich, S.J.; Friedrich, M. The genome of the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans, reveals potential mechanisms underlying reproduction, host interactions, and novel targets for pest control. BMC Biol. 2021, 19, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Makhahlela, N.B.; Liebenberg, D.; Van Hamburg, H.; Taioe, M.O.; Onyiche, T.; Ramatla, T.; Thekisoe, O.M. Detection of pathogens of veterinary importance harboured by Stomoxys calcitrans in South African feedlots. Sci. Afr. 2022, 15, e01112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Levchenko, M.A.; Silivanova, E.A. Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae): Value for Veterinary Medicine. Review. Russ. J. Parasitol. 2020, 14, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patra, G.; Behera, P.; Das, S.K.; Saikia, B.; Ghosh, S.; Biswas, P.; Kumar, A.; Alam, S.S.; Kawlni, L.; Lalnunpuia, C. Stomoxys calcitrans and its importance in livestock. Int. J. Adv. Agric. Res. 2018, 6, 30–37. [Google Scholar]
  19. Baldacchino, F.; Muenworn, V.; Desquesnes, M.; Desoli, F.; Charoenviriyaphap, T.; Duvallet, G. Transmission of pathogens by Stomoxys flies (Diptera, Muscidae): A review. Parasite 2013, 20, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Araújo, T.R.; Júnior, M.A.L.M.; Vilela, T.S.; Bittecourt, A.J.; Santos, H.A.; Fampa, P. First report of the presence of Anaplasma marginale in different tissues of the stable-fly Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2021, 23, 100515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hornok, S.; Takács, N.; Szekeres, S.; Szőke, K.; Kontschán, J.; Horváth, G.; Sugár, L. DNA of Theileria orientalis, T. equi and T. capreoli in stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans). Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sharif, S.; Jacquiet, P.; Prevot, F.; Grisez, C.; Raymond-Letron, I.; Semin, M.; Geffré, A.; Trumel, C.; Franc, M.; Bouhsira, É. Stomoxys calcitrans, mechanical vector of virulent Besnoitia besnoiti from chronically infected cattle to susceptible rabbit. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2019, 33, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cook, C.G.; Munyanduki, H.; Fay, P.C.; Wijesiriwardana, N.; Moffat, K.; Gubbins, S.; Armstrong, S.; Batten, C.; Dietrich, I.; Greaves, D.R. The mechanical arthropod vector Stomoxys calcitrans influences the outcome of lumpy skin disease virus infection in cattle. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. González, M.A.; Ruiz-Arrondo, I.; Bravo-Barriga, D.; Cervera-Acedo, C.; Santibañez, P.; Oteo, J.A.; Miranda, M.Á.; Barceló, C. Surveillance and screening in Stomoxyinae flies from Mallorca Island (Spain) reveal the absence of selected pathogens but confirms the presence of the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia pipientis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2024, 171, 105206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Haegeman, A.; Sohier, C.; Mostin, L.; De Leeuw, I.; Van Campe, W.; Philips, W.; De Regge, N.; De Clercq, K. Evidence of Lumpy Skin Disease Virus Transmission from Subclinically Infected Cattle by Stomoxys calcitrans. Viruses 2023, 15, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cook, D. A historical review of management options used against the stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae). Insects 2020, 11, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Leesombun, A.; Sungpradit, S.; Boonmasawai, S.; Weluwanarak, T.; Klinsrithong, S.; Ruangsittichai, J.; Ampawong, S.; Masmeatathip, R.; Changbunjong, T. Insecticidal activity of Plectranthus amboinicus essential oil against the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) and the horse fly Tabanus megalops (Diptera: Tabanidae). Insects 2022, 13, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Akash; Shilpa; Ravindra, B.G.; Halmandge, S.; Kumar, R.T.; Kasaralikar, V.R.; Kumar, D.D. Evaluation of neem oil and lemon grass oil as natural fly repellant on lumpy skin disease vector in buffalo farms. Pharma Innov. J. 2022, 11, 389–392. [Google Scholar]
  29. González, M.A.; Duvallet, G.; Morel, D.; de Blas, I.; Barrio, E.; Ruiz-Arrondo, I. An Integrated Pest Management Strategy Approach for the Management of the Stable Fly Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Insects 2024, 15, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beresford, D.; Sutcliffe, J. Evidence for sticky-trap avoidance by stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae), in response to trapped flies. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2017, 33, 250–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jacquiet, P.; Rouet, D.; Bouhsira, E.; Salem, A.; Lienard, E.; Franc, M. Population dynamics of Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae) in southwestern France. Rev. Med. Vet. 2014, 165, 267–271. [Google Scholar]
  32. Phasuk, J.; Prabaripai, A.; Chareonviriyaphap, T. Seasonality and daily flight activity of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairy farms in Saraburi Province, Thailand. Parasite 2013, 20, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodríguez-Batista, Z.; Leite, R.; Oliveira, P.; Lopes, C.; Borges, L. Populational dynamics of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linneaus) (Diptera: Muscidae) in three biocenosis, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 130, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Taylor, D.B.; Moon, R.D.; Mark, D.R. Economic impact of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairy and beef cattle production. J. Med. Entomol. 2012, 49, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gilles, J.; David, J.F.; Duvallet, G.; De La Rocque, S.; Tillard, E. Efficiency of traps for Stomoxys calcitrans and Stomoxys niger niger on Reunion Island. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2007, 21, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Machtinger, E.; Leppla, N.; Hogsette, J. House and stable fly seasonal abundance, larval development substrates, and natural parasitism on small equine farms in Florida. Neotrop. Entomol. 2016, 45, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Boucheikhchoukh, M.; Mechouk, N.; Benakhla, A.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. Molecular evidence of bacteria in Melophagus ovinus sheep keds and Hippobosca equina forest flies collected from sheep and horses in northeastern Algeria. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 65, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zeghouma, D.; Bouslama, Z.; Duvallet, G.; Amr, Z.S. Horse flies and their seasonal abundance in El Tarf Province of northeastern Algeria. J. Vector Ecol. 2018, 43, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cherairia, M.; Adler, P.H.; Samraoui, B. Biodiversity and bionomics of the black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) of northeastern Algeria. Zootaxa 2014, 3796, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lafri, I.; Bitam, I. Phlebotomine sandflies and associated pathogens in Algeria: Update and comprehensive overview. Vet. Ital. 2021, 57, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kadjoudj, N.; Bounamous, A.; Kouba, Y.; Dik, B.; Zeroual, S.; Amira, A.; Chenchouni, H. Composition and diversity of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in rural and suburban environments of Algeria. Acta Trop. 2022, 234, 106588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Peel, M.C.; Finlayson, B.L.; McMahon, T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Laveissière, C. Les glossines vectrices de la trypanosomiase africaine. In Biologie et Contröle; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland; UBC: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zumpt, F. The Stomoxyine Biting Flies of the World: Diptera, Muscidae; Taxonomy, Biology, Economic Importance and Control Measures; Fischer: Stuttgart, Germany, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  45. Malaithong, N.; Duvallet, G.; Ngoen-Klan, R.; Bangs, M.J.; Chareonviriyaphap, T. Stomoxyinae flies in Thailand: A precis, with abridged taxonomic key to the adult species. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Power, N. Data Access Viewer. 2022. Available online: https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/ (accessed on 1 July 2022).
  47. Kahana-Sutin, E.; Klement, E.; Lensky, I.; Gottlieb, Y. High relative abundance of the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans is associated with lumpy skin disease outbreaks in Israeli dairy farms. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2017, 31, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zohra, L.; Ferroudja, M.-B.; Bahia, D.-M.; Salaheddine, D. Bioecology of culicidae (Diptera: Nematocera) in north central Algeria. Bull. Pure Appl. Sci.-Zool. 2022, 41, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adler, P.H.; Haouchine, S.; Belqat, B.; Lounaci, A. North African Endemism: A New Species of Black Fly (Diptera: Simuliidae) from the Djurdjura Mountains of Algeria. Insects 2024, 15, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tunnakundacha, S.; Desquesnes, M.; Masmeatathip, R. Comparison of Vavoua, Malaise and Nzi traps with and without attractants for trapping of Stomoxys spp.(Diptera: Muscidae) and tabanids (Diptera: Tabanidae) on cattle farms. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2017, 51, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mihok, S.; Kang’Ethe, E.K.; Kamau, G.K. Trials of traps and attractants for Stomoxys spp.(Diptera: Muscidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1995, 32, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Murchie, A.K.; Hall, C.E.; Gordon, A.W.; Clawson, S. Black Border Increases Stomoxys calcitrans Catch on White Sticky Traps. Insects 2018, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Malaithong, N.; Duvallet, G.; Nararak, J.; Ngoen-Klan, R.; Tainchum, K.; Chareonviriyaphap, T. Comparison of stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) population dynamics on a cattle farm and at an open zoo in Thailand. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2021, 55, 359–366. [Google Scholar]
  54. Warnes, M.; Finlayson, L. Effect of host behaviour on host preference in Stomoxys calcitrans. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1987, 1, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Khwanket, N.; Tainchum, K.; Chareonviriyaphap, T.; Ngoen-Klan, R.; Noosidum, A. Preferences for livestock bedding as a development substrate of the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans L.(Diptera: Muscidae), and potential application of entomopathogenic nematodes for controlling stable fly larvae. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2024, 38, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nayani, S.A.; Meraj, S.; Mohr, E.; Gries, R.; Kovacs, E.; Devireddy, A.; Gries, G. Staphylococcus microbes in the bovine skin microbiome attract blood-feeding stable flies. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1212222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kovacs, E.M.; Pinard, C.; Gries, R.; Manku, A.; Gries, G. Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Synthetic Cattle Breath Volatiles Attract Host-Seeking Stable Flies, Stomoxys calcitrans. J. Chem. Ecol. 2024, 50, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hansen, A.C.; Moon, R.D.; Endres, M.I.; Pereira, G.M.; Heins, B.J. The Defensive Behaviors and Milk Production of Pastured Dairy Cattle in Response to Stable Flies, Horn Flies, and Face Flies. Animals 2023, 13, 3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Baleba, S.B.; Torto, B.; Masiga, D.; Getahun, M.N.; Weldon, C.W. Stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans L.(Diptera: Muscidae), improve offspring fitness by avoiding oviposition substrates with competitors or parasites. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lysyk, T. Seasonal abundance of stable flies and house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in dairies in Alberta, Canada. J. Med. Entomol. 1993, 30, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karam, G. Population Dynamics and Overwintering Capabilities of the Stable Fly Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae) and Their Pupal Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae, Ichneumonidae) on Dairy Operations in Southern Manitoba. Master’s Thesis, Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  62. Skovgård, H.; Nachman, G. Population dynamics of stable flies Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) at an organic dairy farm in Denmark based on mark-recapture with destructive sub-sampling. Environ. Entomol. 2012, 41, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Masmeatathip, R.; Gilles, J.; Ketavan, C.; Duvallet, G. First survey of seasonal abundance and daily activity of Stomoxys spp.(Diptera: Muscidae) in Kamphaengsaen Campus, Nakornpathom Province, Thailand. Parasite 2006, 13, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Issimov, A.; Taylor, D.B.; Zhugunissov, K.; Kutumbetov, L.; Zhanabayev, A.; Kazhgaliyev, N.; Akhmetaliyeva, A.; Nurgaliyev, B.; Shalmenov, M.; Absatirov, G. The combined effects of temperature and relative humidity parameters on the reproduction of Stomoxys species in a laboratory setting. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Skovgård, H.; Nachman, G. Modeling the temperature-and age-dependent survival, development, and oviposition rates of stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans) (Diptera: Muscidae). Environ. Entomol. 2017, 46, 1130–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lysyk, T. Relationships between temperature and life-history parameters of Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1998, 35, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gilles, J.; David, J.-F.; Duvallet, G. Temperature effects on development and survival of two stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans and Stomoxys niger niger (Diptera: Muscidae), in La Reunion Island. J. Med. Entomol. 2005, 42, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Beresford, D.; Sutcliffe, J. The effect of Macrocheles muscaedomesticae and M. subbadius (Acarina: Macrochelidae) phoresy on the dispersal of Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. Spec. Publ. 2009, 23, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Azevedo, L.H.; Ferreira, M.P.; Castilho, R.d.C.; Cançado, P.H.D.; de Moraes, G.J. Potential of Macrocheles species (Acari: Mesostigmata: Macrochelidae) as control agents of harmful flies (Diptera) and biology of Macrocheles embersoni Azevedo, Castilho and Berto on Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) and Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Biol. Control 2018, 123, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dawit, L.; Addis, M.; Gari, G. Distribution, seasonality and relative abundance of Stomoxys flies in selected districts of central Ethiopia. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 19, 998–1002. [Google Scholar]
  71. Taylor, D.B.; Berkebile, D.R.; Scholl, P.J. Stable fly population dynamics in eastern Nebraska in relation to climatic variables. J. Med. Entomol. 2007, 44, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nayani, S.; Gries, R.; Blake, A.; Gries, G. Abiotic characteristics and organic constituents of oviposition sites as oviposition attractants and stimulants for gravid female stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2024, 172, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Muenworn, V.; Duvallet, G.; Thainchum, K.; Tuntakom, S.; Tanasilchayakul, S.; Prabaripai, A.; Akratanakul, P.; Sukonthabhirom, S.; Chareonviriyaphap, T. Geographic Distribution of Stomoxyine Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) and Diurnal Activity of Stomoxys calcitrans in Thailand. J. Med. Entomol. 2010, 47, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mihok, S.; Clausen, P.H. Feeding habits of Stomoxys spp. stable flies in a Kenyan forest. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1996, 10, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Berry, I.; Campbell, J. Time and weather effects on daily feeding patterns of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae). Environ. Entomol. 1985, 14, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Müller, G.; Hogsette, J.; Beier, J.; Traore, S.; Toure, M.; Traore, M.; Bah, S.; Doumbia, S.; Schlein, Y. Attraction of Stomoxys sp. to various fruits and flowers in Mali. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2012, 26, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Geographical location of the prospected farms (Reconstructed from d-maps.com).
Figure 1. Geographical location of the prospected farms (Reconstructed from d-maps.com).
Parasitologia 05 00052 g001
Figure 2. Number of trapped flies of all species combined and number of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) in each of the surveyed farms.
Figure 2. Number of trapped flies of all species combined and number of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) in each of the surveyed farms.
Parasitologia 05 00052 g002
Figure 3. Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) activity fluctuations from July 2022 to July 2023. FDT: Fly Density Per Trap.
Figure 3. Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) activity fluctuations from July 2022 to July 2023. FDT: Fly Density Per Trap.
Parasitologia 05 00052 g003
Figure 4. Daily variation in the Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density per trap (FDT) for each month between 2022 and 2023 in the Batna region.
Figure 4. Daily variation in the Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density per trap (FDT) for each month between 2022 and 2023 in the Batna region.
Parasitologia 05 00052 g004
Figure 5. Monthly variation in Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density per trap (FDT) in the Timgad cattle farm and Oued Taga small ruminants farm.
Figure 5. Monthly variation in Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density per trap (FDT) in the Timgad cattle farm and Oued Taga small ruminants farm.
Parasitologia 05 00052 g005
Figure 6. Daily variation in Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density (FDT) in the Timgad cattle farm and Oued Taga small ruminant farm, each month is represented with a color: During their high activity, Stable flies exhibited a bimodal daily activity pattern in the cattle farm between 8 and 12 p.m. and between 4 and 6 p.m. In the small ruminant farm, S. calcitrans activity was unimodal, and flies were active from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Figure 6. Daily variation in Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density (FDT) in the Timgad cattle farm and Oued Taga small ruminant farm, each month is represented with a color: During their high activity, Stable flies exhibited a bimodal daily activity pattern in the cattle farm between 8 and 12 p.m. and between 4 and 6 p.m. In the small ruminant farm, S. calcitrans activity was unimodal, and flies were active from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Parasitologia 05 00052 g006
Figure 7. Association between the overall monthly activity of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) and environmental data.
Figure 7. Association between the overall monthly activity of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) and environmental data.
Parasitologia 05 00052 g007
Table 1. Number of trapped Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) and their FDT (Fly Density Per Trap) in the prospected farms.
Table 1. Number of trapped Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) and their FDT (Fly Density Per Trap) in the prospected farms.
CattleSmall Ruminants
NFDTNFDT
S. calcitrans116268.35825.85
S. calcitrans 103060.58745.29
S. calcitrans 1327.7680.57
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between two-hour averages for each climatic variable and the Stomoxys Calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) catches recorded every two hours in northeastern Algeria.
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between two-hour averages for each climatic variable and the Stomoxys Calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) catches recorded every two hours in northeastern Algeria.
TemperaturePrecipitationWind SpeedRelative Humidity
Stomoxys calcitransCorrelation coefficient0.2900.1530.034−0.035
Spearman’s p value0.0000.0340.6370.625
Males S. calcitransCorrelation coefficient0.2500.1530.047−0.022
Spearman’s p value0.0000.0340.5200.760
Females S. calcitransCorrelation coefficient0.1650.144−0.0520.015
Spearman’s p value0.0220.0460.4690.837
Table 3. Monthly variation in Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density and climatic parameters.
Table 3. Monthly variation in Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) density and climatic parameters.
SummerAutomnWinterSpringSummer
20222023
JulyAugSeptOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJuly
Stomoxys calcitrans0.536249.510232.2515000113.58
S. calcitrans 0.53024292.620.7510.33000012.54
S. calcitrans 067.59.411.54.670001014
Temperature (°C)34.4130.0428.8119.6514.8310.357.7710.5916.6419.0422.7326.1635.96
Maximum Temperature (°C)39.1436.7336.5228.0623.6319.8916.9719.8225.0330.7228.4234.3939.63
Minimum temperature (°C)14.4614.548.178.56−0.12−0.34−4.9−5.91−3.32−1.883.399.9617.29
Relative Humidity (%)18.6727.2433.650.6653.9458.3955.7940.8833.6827.9729.236.513.71
Precipitation (mm)0.00150.0410.0240.1370.0730.012000.000800.0030.0110
Wind speed (m/s)2.373.542.82.171.491.441.121.172.522.661.944.676.28
Maximum wind speed (m/s)5.347.296.254.27.235.526.315.796.015.746.435.626.00
Minimum wind speed (m/s)0.120.050.090.190.140.150.080.10.160.170.140.040.12
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azzouzi, C.; Boucheikhchoukh, M.; Mechouk, N.; Sedraoui, S.; Zenia, S. Monthly and Daily Dynamics of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Muscidae) in Livestock Farms of the Batna Region (Northeastern Algeria). Parasitologia 2025, 5, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040052

AMA Style

Azzouzi C, Boucheikhchoukh M, Mechouk N, Sedraoui S, Zenia S. Monthly and Daily Dynamics of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Muscidae) in Livestock Farms of the Batna Region (Northeastern Algeria). Parasitologia. 2025; 5(4):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azzouzi, Chaimaa, Mehdi Boucheikhchoukh, Noureddine Mechouk, Scherazad Sedraoui, and Safia Zenia. 2025. "Monthly and Daily Dynamics of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Muscidae) in Livestock Farms of the Batna Region (Northeastern Algeria)" Parasitologia 5, no. 4: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040052

APA Style

Azzouzi, C., Boucheikhchoukh, M., Mechouk, N., Sedraoui, S., & Zenia, S. (2025). Monthly and Daily Dynamics of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Muscidae) in Livestock Farms of the Batna Region (Northeastern Algeria). Parasitologia, 5(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop