# Modeling of Coalmine Methane Flows to Estimate the Spacing of Primary Roof Breaks

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{5}

^{6}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

_{4}).

_{3}CJSC “Mine named after. A.F. Zasyadko” (development depth exceeded 1300 m, longwall length of 300–305 m) during the mining of the 18th eastern longwall. A series of 3 wells with different parameters of spatial orientation (“pads”) were sunk at a frequency of 20–25 m, while in each pad, there were two wells (No. 2 and No. 3) oriented to the overlying massif (with re-drilling of gas-bearing sandstone) and one “axial” (No. 4, with a zero turn), or “on the goaf” (No. 4). To assess the features of methane emission flows, two types of wells were selected—type No. 2 and No. 4 due to the fact that the angle of their turn to the bottom of the longwall was the same (β = 60°). Moreover, the ascent angles relative to the horizon were also equal (α = 60°, Figure 1), which determines the similarity in the development of deformation processes in the conditions of the previously undermined massif and the beginning development of reserves.

^{2}), was used in the first stage—the selection of filtering/smoothing parameters according to the method given in [39]. In contrast to the criteria approach [40], artificial neural networks (ANN) [41], the multivariate regression method (with the application of SPSS software) [42], or the finite element method (FEM) [43], further, already smoothed data (on a distributed grid) were interpolated similarly to the study [39], after which the parameters of high-degree polynomials were selected (regression) by the method of least squares. The algorithms were first written in “Vi Improved” (version 9.0, open-source software from Bram Moolenaar, Holland) in Python (version 2.7.10., Python Software Foundation, DE, USA). To improve the quality of modeling at each stage, the residuals on the projections (Z = ƒ(X;Y)) were analyzed, and the presentation of graphical results (vectorization) was programmed in the “gnuplot” program (version 5.4, Thomas Williams & Colin Kelley). To assess the quality of the final models, at the last stage, quantile–quantile (Q-Q) plots were additionally built in MS Excel.

_{4})—well type No. 2—and 261 points—type No. 2 (due to the fact that wells in goaf were drilled through one picket). The “data set” fragment is presented in Table 1.

## 3. Results

_{3}seam is shown in Figure 3.

_{4}≥ 60% (the area limited by the black curve) from −120 to −30 m before the stope.

_{4}= 100–90%, the area bounded by the dark yellow curve) can be traced from −120 to −40 m, followed by its sharp decrease from −38 to −14 m (from 80 to 40%), which is replaced by a more gentle decline to −4 m (from 40 to 30%). Stabilization and constancy of the methane concentration = 30%, which began −4 m ahead of the longwall, continues up to 50 m behind it, while this trend does not change during the first 63 m (S = 1320 m) of the longwall. When the stoping face line approaches the mark S = 1320 m, up to S = 1268 m, the area of the local maximum decreases from the area −120 to −43 m to the area −106 to −98 m. Further, the area of the maximum concentration disappears and begins to be traced only from the range S = 1218–1165 m, at distances from −120 to −110 m to −60 to −43 m ahead of the longwall. Behind the longwall of the studied area, it does not exist up to S = 1197, while it is localized at the level L = 50 m. With subsequent mining of the reserves, the area of the local maximum gradually increases in size. It reaches its maximum expansion (L = from 30 to 50 m) at S = from 1180 to 1160 m relative to the beginning of the extraction column. Further, from S = 1160, the studied area sharply decreases and shifts again to L = 50 m at S = 1140 m.

_{4}≥ 60%), starting from S = 1320 m, is removed relative to the distance to the bottom hole (L = −110 to −85 m) and decreases in size, after which, up to S = 1220 m, the size and localization of this zone remain stable. A very interesting mining area is S = 1218–1200 m, which is characterized by the presence of CH

_{4}≥ 60% for any distance from the stope, both in front and behind the longwall. After S = 1200 m, the zone is removed relative to the distance to the face L = from −120 to −10 m and decreases in size L = from −120 to −53 m in front of the longwall at S = 1140 m.

_{4}≤ 20%, limited by the orange curve in Figure 3) begins to form from 1310 m from the beginning of the extraction column at L = −28 m in front of the longwall and gradually expands in size. The maximum width of the region (L = from −60 to −8 m) is traced at S = 1250 m, after which it sharply narrows to a point (S = 1240 m L = −35 m). Further, the area of the minimum concentration disappears and begins to be traced only from S = 1183 m, at a distance of −11 m in front of the longwall. The maximum width of the region (L = from −37 to 7 m) is traced at S = 1162 m, after which it sharply narrows to a point (S = 1140 m L = −15 m). Behind the longwall, this area is essentially absent.

^{2}= 0.97):

- -
- The definition domain of the points (orthogonality interval of the approximating polynomials) corresponds to S = S′ for all S′ ∈ [0, π] and L = L′ for all corresponds to S = S′ for all S′ ∈ [0, π] and L = L′ for all L′ ∈ [0, π].

_{3}seam are shown in Figure 4.

_{4}≥ 60%) begins from points S = 1323 m and L = 4 m behind the longwall. The maximum width of the region (L = from −6 to 15 m) is traced at S = 1305 m, after which sharp narrowing to a point (S = 1298 m L = from 2 m) is observed. Further, insignificant dimensions of the studied zone begin to be traced only from the range S = 1197–1194 m, at distances from −12 to −9 m ahead of the longwall. Subsequently, behind the longwall, the zone begins to form from 1172 m from the beginning of the site at L = −50 m in front of the longwall and gradually expands in size. The maximum width of the region (L = from 20 to 50 m) is observed at S = 1140 m, after which it sharply narrows to a width of L = from 33 to 50 m at S = 1120 m.

_{4}≥ 60%), starting from S = 1340 m, is stably traced at a distance L = −10 m in front of the longwall and in the entire range L = 0–50 m behind it (which means the width of the area is 60 m) to the picket S = 1298 m. Subsequent mining of the reserves leads to a decrease in the width of the area to the point S = 1261 m L = 5 m. Of particular interest is the area of the extraction column S = 1260–1218 m, which is characterized by the presence of CH

_{4}≤ 60% for any distance from the stoping face, both in front of and behind the longwall. Moreover, several zones of the “local minimum” are dispersed on one line in this range. Further, the area of high productivity of degassing begins from the point (S = 1218 m; L = −13 m), expanding sharply up to 50 m behind the longwall (starting from S = 1208 m) and up to −34 m in front of the longwall (S = 1200 m). Further, ahead of the longwall, there is a slight decrease in the width of the zone of high methane content, followed by stabilization at a value of L = −25 m, from S = 1168 m to S = 1120 m.

_{4}≤ 20%) in front of the longwall can be traced from a picket of 1340 m, at a distance L = from −120 to −18 m and gradually decreasing (at the first stage) in size to S = 1278 m (L = from −120 to −35 m). Further, the area expands to maximum values of −120 to −13 m at picket 1239 m, after which the width of the area again begins to decrease to minimum values (L = from −120 to −84 m) at S = 1200 m. In the last stage, the growth and stabilization of the zone width up to L = from −120 to −39 m after the picket = 1168 m is typical. Behind the longwall, the area of the local minimum begins to form from 1260 m from the beginning of the excavation column to 50 m ahead of the longwall and gradually expands in size. The maximum width of the region (L = 20 to 50 m) is traced at S = 1239 m, after which it sharply narrows to a point (S = 1220 m L = 50 m).

## 4. Discussion

## 5. Conclusions

- Deformation-wave processes in geo-environments produce cyclic non-linearities in the nature of the air–gas regime of mine methane emissions into anthropogenic rock masses, while only a part of the gas flows is captured by the degassing network in the extraction area.
- It has been established for the first time that a decrease in the distance of the stoping face line from the start of mining of the extraction column S = from 1340 to 1120 m and the distance in front of the longwall L = from −120 to 0 m leads to undulating changes in gas release (in wells No. 2), according to a polynomial dependence.
- The influence of situational geomechanical conditions of reserve mining on the area and the shape of the local extrema of the models was clarified. These models are transformed in proportion to the development of the stoping front and are displaced at certain angles to the alignment with the longwall.

_{3}seam mining in Donbass. The main constraints include a development depth of 1250–1350 m, natural methane content of 23 m

^{3}/t dry ash-free mass and above, a coal seam thickness of 1.3–1.55 m, (the main limiting mining and technical factor) a rock temperature that exceeds 41 °C.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Saunois, M.; Jackson, R.B.; Bousquet, P.; Poulter, B.; Canadell, J.G. The growing role of methane in anthropogenic climate change. Environ. Res. Lett.
**2016**, 11, 120207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Shukla, P.R.; Skea, J.; Slade, R.; Khourdajie, A.A.; van Diemen, R.; McCollum, D.; Pathak, M.; Some, S.; Vyas, P.; Fradera, R.; et al. IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022; p. 2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvia, F.; Talia, V.; Di Matteo, M. Coal mining and policy responses: Are externalities appropriately addressed? A meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy
**2021**, 126, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rylnikova, M.V. The Harmonious Development of Mining, Science and Higher Education—A Guarantee of Stable State of Mining Regions in Russia. Sustain. Dev. Mt. Territ.
**2020**, 12, 154–161. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Golik, V.I.; Razorenov, Y.I.; Dmitrak, Y.V.; Gabaraev, O.Z. Safety improvement of the underground ore extraction considering mass geodynamics. Occup. Saf. industry.
**2019**, 8, 36–42. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rybak, J.; Tyulyaeva, Y.; Kongar-Syuryun, C.; Khayrutdinov, A.M.; Akinshin, I. Geomechanical substantiation of parameters of technology for mining salt deposits with a backfill. Min. Sci.
**2021**, 28, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Amrani, M.; Taha, Y.; El Haloui, Y.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R. Sustainable Reuse of Coal Mine Waste: Experimental and Economic Assessments for Embankments and Pavement Layer Applications in Morocco. Minerals
**2020**, 10, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kongar-Syuryun, C.B.; Faradzhov, V.V.; Tyulyaeva, Y.S.; Khayrutdinov, A.M. Effect of activating treatment of halite flotation waste in backfill mixture preparation. Min. Inf. Anal. Bull.
**2021**, 1, 43–57. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gabaraev, O.Z.; Konovalova, T.G.; Turluev, R.R. Ecology and utilization of ore dressing tailings. IOP Conf. Ser. EarthEnviron. Sci.
**2022**, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khayrutdinov, A.; Paleev, I.; Artemov, S. Replacement of traditional components of the backfill mixture with man-made waste. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.
**2021**, 904, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dzhioeva, A.K. Prospects for mining ecologization to reduce harmful emissions into the atmosphere. Ugol’
**2022**, 10, 29–32. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rybak, J.; Khayrutdinov, M.M.; Kuziev, D.A.; Kongar-Syuryun, C.B.; Babyr, N.V. Prediction of the geomechanical state of the rock mass when mining salt deposits with stowing. J. Min. Inst.
**2022**, 253, 61–70. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Adero, N.J.; Drebenstedt, C.; Prokofeva, E.N.; Vostrikov, A.V. Spatial data and technologies for geomonitoring of land use under aspect of mineral resource sector development. Eurasian Min.
**2020**, 1, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mohammadi, S.; Ataei, M.; Kakaie, R.; Mirzaghorbanali, A.; Aziz, N. A Probabilistic Model to Determine Main Caving Span by Evaluating Cavability of Immediate Roof Strata in Longwall Mining. Geotech. Geol. Eng.
**2021**, 39, 2221–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mohammadi, S.; Ataei, M.; Kakaie, R.; Mirzaghorbanali, A. A New Roof Strata Cavability Index (RSCi) for Longwall Mining Incorporating New Rating System. Geotech. Geol. Eng.
**2019**, 37, 3619–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khanal, M.; Qu, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, J.; Zhu, W.; Hou, T.; Song, S. Characterization of Overburden Deformation and Subsidence Behavior in a Kilometer Deep Longwall Mine. Minerals.
**2022**, 12, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Islavath, S.; Deb, D. Interaction of a Shield Structure with Surrounding Rock Strata Under Geo-static and Fatigue Loadings. Geotech. Geol. Eng.
**2022**, 40, 2949–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Arasteh, H.; Esmaeili, K.; Saeedi, G.; Farsangi, M.A.E. Discontinuous Modeling of Roof Strata Caving in a Mechanized Longwall Mine in Tabas Coal Mine. Int. J. Geomech.
**2022**, 22, 04022040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rasouli, H.; Shahriar, K.; Madani, S.H. Prediction of the Height of Fracturing via Gene Expression Programming in Australian Longwall Panels: A Comparative Study. Rud. GeoloskoNaft. Zb.
**2022**, 37, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Liang, Z. Mining-Induced Stress and Ground Pressure Behavior Characteristics in Mining a Thick Coal Seam With Hard Roofs. Front. Earth Sci.
**2022**, 10, 843191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Polevshchikov, G.Y. Deformation-wave processes under production face advance in coal and rocks. J. Min. Sci.
**2013**, 49, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shemyakin, E.I.; Fisenko, G.L.; Kurlenya, M.V.; Oparin, V.N.; Reva, V.N.; Glushikhin, F.P.; Rosenbaum, M.A.; Tropp, E.A.; Kuznetsov, Y.S. The effect of zonal disintegration of rocks around underground workings. Doklady Akademii Nauk
**1986**, 1, 289. [Google Scholar] - Shemyakin, E.I.; Fisenko, G.L.; Kurlenya, M.V.; Oparin, V.N.; Reva, V.N.; Glushikhin, F.P.; Rozenbaum, M.A.; Tropp, E.A.; Kuznetsov, Y.S. Zonal Disintegration of Rocks and Underground Workings Stability; Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2008; p. 276. [Google Scholar]
- Young, R.P.; Nasseri, M.H.B.; Sehizadeh, M. Mechanical and seismic anisotropy of rocks from the ONKALO underground rock characterization facility. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min.
**2020**, 126, 104190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ghaffari, H.; Nasseri, M.; Young, R. Faulting of Rocks in a Three-Dimensional Stress Field by Micro-Anticracks. Sci. Rep.
**2014**, 4, 5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Cao, Z.; Gao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, J. Mechanical Behavior and Permeability Evolution of Coal under Different Mining Induced Stress Conditions and Gas Pressures. Energies
**2020**, 13, 2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karimpouli, S.; Tahmasebi, P.; Ramandi, H.L. A review of experimental and numerical modeling of digital coalbed methane: Imaging, segmentation, fractures modeling and permeability prediction. Int. J. Coal Geol.
**2020**, 228, 103552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Szlazak, N.; Obracaj, D.; Korzec, M. Estimation of Gas Loss in Methodology for Determining Methane Content of Coal Seams. Energies
**2021**, 14, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brigida, V.S.; Zinchenko, N.N. Methane Release in Drainage Holes Ahead of Coal Face. J. Min. Sci.
**2014**, 50, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gryazev, M.V.; Kachurin, N.M.; Vorob’ev, S.A. Mathematical Models of Gas-Dynamic and Thermophysical Processes in Underground Coal Mining at Different Stages of Mine Development. J. Min. Inst.
**2017**, 223, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qu, Q.; Shi, J.; Wilkins, A. A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate. Energies
**2022**, 15, 3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cheng, Y.P.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.L. Environmental impact of coal mine methane emissions and responding strategies in China. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control.
**2011**, 5, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jiangfu, H.; Wenchao, H.; Chengpeng, Z.; Zhongguang, S.; Xiaoyi, S. Numerical simulation on the deformation characteristics of borehole failure in gas-bearing coal seams considering the effective stress principle under complicated stress path conditions. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energy Geo-Resour.
**2022**, 8, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hou, X.; Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, Y. Evaluation of gas contents for a multi-seam deep coalbed methane reservoir and their geo-logical controls: In situ direct method versus indirect method. Fuel
**2020**, 265, 116917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bosikov, I.I.; Klyuev, R.V.; Khetagurov, V.N.; Azhmukhamedov, I.M. Development of methods and controls for aerogasodynamic processes at mining sites. Sustain. Dev. Mt. Territ.
**2021**, 1, 77–83. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kadochnikov, V.G.; Dvoynikov, M.V. Development of Technology for Hydromechanical Breakdown of Mud Plugs and Improvement of Well Cleaning by Controlled Buckling of the Drill String. Appl. Sci.
**2022**, 12, 6460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bosikov, I.I.; Klyuev, R.V.; Azhmukhamedov, I.M.; Revazov, V.C. Assessment of coal mine ventilation control using statistical dynamics methods. Min. Inf. Anal. Bull.
**2021**, 11, 123–135. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yao, H.; Peng, H.; Hong, B.; Guo, Q.; Ding, H.; Hong, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Cai, C.; Chi, J. Environmental Controls on Multi-Scale Dynamics of Net Carbon Dioxide Exchange From an Alpine Peatland on the Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Front. Plant Sci.
**2022**, 12, 791343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dzhioeva, A.K.; Brigida, V.S. Spatial non-linearity of methane release dynamics in underground boreholes for sustainable mining. J. Min. Inst.
**2020**, 245, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qu, Q.; Balusu, R.; Belle, B. Specific gas emissions in Bowen Basin longwall mines, Australia. International. Int. J. Coal Geol.
**2022**, 261, 104076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Borowski, M.; Zyczkowski, P.; Cheng, J.; Luczak, R.; Zwolinska, K. The Combustion of Methane from Hard Coal Seams in Gas Engines as a Technology Leading to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Electricity Prediction Using ANN. Energies
**2020**, 13, 4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alipenhani, B.; Majdi, A.; Amnieh, H.B. Determination of Caving Hydraulic Radius of Rock Mass in Block Caving Method using Numerical Modeling and Multivariate Regression. J. Min. Environ.
**2022**, 13, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khanal, M.; Adhikary, D.; Balusu, R.; Wilkins, A.; Belle, B. Mechanical study of shear failure of vertical goaf drainage hole. Geotech. Geol. Eng.
**2022**, 40, 1899–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Niu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, E.; Li, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Duan, X.; Li, H.; Wei, Y.; Qian, J.; Cai, G.; et al. A new method of monitoring the stability of boreholes for methane drainage from coal seams. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed.
**2020**, 15, 107521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brigida, V.S.; Golik, V.I.; Dmitrak, Y.V.; Gabaraev, O.Z. Ensuring Stability of Undermining Inclined Drainage Holes During Intensive Development of Multiple Gas-Bearing Coal Layers. J. Min. Inst.
**2019**, 239, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qu, Q.; Guo, H.; Balusu, R. Methane emissions and dynamics from adjacent coal seams in a high permeability multi-seam mining environment. Int. J. Coal Geol.
**2022**, 253, 103969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y.; Wu, S.; Nie, B.; Ma, Y. A new pattern of underground space-time Tridimensional gas drainage: A case study in Yuwu coal mine, China. Energy Sci. Eng.
**2019**, 7, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Dzhioeva, A.K.; Tekhov, A.V. Reduction of mine methane emissions for ensuring sustainable development of geotechnologies in the transition to Industry 3.0. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
**2021**, 1064, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qin, B.; Shi, Z.S.; Hao, J.F.; Ye, D.L.; Liang, B.; Sun, W.J. Analysis of the Space–Time Synergy of Coal and Gas Co-mining. ACS Omega
**2022**, 7, 13737–13749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shi, Z.; Ye, D.; Hao, J.; Qin, B.; Li, G. Research on Gas Extraction and Cut Flow Technology for Lower Slice Pressure Relief Gas under Slice Mining of Extra-thick Coal Seam. ACS Omega
**2022**, 7, 24531–24550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, C.; Tu, S.; Bai, Q.; Yang, G.; Zhang, L. Evaluating pressure-relief mining performances based on surface gas vent hole extraction data in longwall coal mines. J. Nat. Gas Eng.
**2015**, 24, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, T.; Zhao, Y.; Kong, X.; Lin, B.; Zou, Q. Dynamics of coalbed methane emission from coal cores under various stress paths and its application in gas extraction in mining-disturbed coal seam. J. Nat. Gas Eng.
**2022**, 104, 104677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khanal, M.; Poulsen, B.; Adhikary, D.; Balusu, R.; Wilkins, A.; Belle, B. Numerical study of stability and connectivity of vertical goaf drainage holes. Geotech. Geol. Eng.
**2021**, 39, 2669–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhou, J.; Lin, H.; Jin, H.; Li, S.; Yan, Z.; Huang, S. Cooperative prediction method of gas emission from mining face based on feature selection and machine learning. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol.
**2022**, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhong, S.; Lin, D. Evaluation of the Coordination Degree of Coal and Gas Co-Mining System Based on System Dynamics. Sustainability.
**2022**, 14, 16434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**The sink scheme of wells of various types in the excavation area: 1—gray sandstone; 2—dark gray siltstone; 3—mudstone; 4—seam m

_{3}; 5—mined-out space of previously worked out longwall; 6—bi-support; 7—belt road of 17th eastern longwall; 8—contour deformations; 9—casing; 10—air drift of 18th eastern longwall.

**Figure 2.**The distribution of methane concentration in the previously mined rock mass during reverse development of the m

_{3}seam (according to well type No. 2): L is the distance to the stopping face line of the 18th eastern longwall, m; S is remoteness of the face of the 18th eastern longwall relative to the beginning of the extraction column (pickets), m; P is main roof span, at a different point in time; CH

_{4}is the concentration of methane in the extracted mixture, %.

**Figure 3.**Evolution of the intensity of emission flows of coalmine methane during reverse mining of the m

_{3}seam (according to data from wells type No. 4).

**Figure 5.**Scatter of modeling residuals (M) in relation to experimental data (O) for well type No. 2.

N | Wells No. 4 | Wells No. 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

L, m | S, m | Measurements CH_{4}, % | L, m | S, m | Measurements CH_{4}, % | |

1 | −20 | 1330 | 2 | −30 | 1330 | 60 |

2 | −18 | 1330 | 10 | −28 | 1330 | 40 |

3 | −6 | 1330 | 100 | −26 | 1330 | 27 |

4 | 8 | 1330 | 88 | −24 | 1330 | 30 |

5 | 10 | 1330 | 86 | −22 | 1330 | 13 |

6 | 16 | 1330 | 86 | −20 | 1330 | 25 |

7 | 28 | 1330 | 65 | −18 | 1330 | 24 |

8 | 46 | 1330 | 48 | −6 | 1330 | 44 |

9 | −26 | 1310 | 15 | 8 | 1330 | 30 |

10 | −12 | 1310 | 72 | 10 | 1330 | 27 |

11 | −10 | 1310 | 100 | 16 | 1330 | 15 |

12 | −4 | 1310 | 95 | 28 | 1330 | 15 |

13 | 8 | 1310 | 90 | 46 | 1330 | 15 |

14 | 26 | 1310 | 80 | 50 | 1330 | 14 |

15 | 34 | 1310 | 72 | −50 | 1310 | 90 |

N | Wells No. 4 | Wells No. 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|

Model, % | Measurements, % | Model, % | Measurements, % | |

1 | 6.51 | 2 | 60.77 | 60 |

2 | 20.19 | 10 | 56.72 | 40 |

3 | 76.19 | 100 | 53.30 | 27 |

4 | 87.34 | 88 | 50.37 | 30 |

5 | 85.77 | 86 | 47.82 | 13 |

6 | 79.08 | 86 | 45.51 | 25 |

7 | 65.99 | 65 | 43.36 | 24 |

8 | 60.70 | 48 | 31.43 | 44 |

9 | 5.62 | 15 | 24.47 | 30 |

10 | 73.84 | 72 | 24.57 | 27 |

11 | 79.95 | 100 | 25.89 | 15 |

12 | 92.23 | 95 | 27.30 | 15 |

13 | 94.23 | 90 | 20.46 | 15 |

14 | 79.06 | 80 | 20.29 | 14 |

15 | 77.16 | 72 | 72.92 | 90 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Brigida, V.S.; Golik, V.I.; Dzeranov, B.V.
Modeling of Coalmine Methane Flows to Estimate the Spacing of Primary Roof Breaks. *Mining* **2022**, *2*, 809-821.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mining2040045

**AMA Style**

Brigida VS, Golik VI, Dzeranov BV.
Modeling of Coalmine Methane Flows to Estimate the Spacing of Primary Roof Breaks. *Mining*. 2022; 2(4):809-821.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mining2040045

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Brigida, Vladimir Sergeevich, Vladimir Ivanovich Golik, and Boris Vitalievich Dzeranov.
2022. "Modeling of Coalmine Methane Flows to Estimate the Spacing of Primary Roof Breaks" *Mining* 2, no. 4: 809-821.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mining2040045