Next Article in Journal
Quantitative PCR for the Diagnosis of HCMV Pneumonia in HSCT Recipients and Other Immunocompromised Hosts
Next Article in Special Issue
The Direct and Indirect Effects of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on the Cardiovascular System in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Previous Article in Journal
Palifermin Compared to Supersaturated Calcium Phosphate Rinse in Prevention of Severe Oral Mucositis after Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy-Based Myeloablative Conditioning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Digital PCR as a New Method for Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring and Treatment Free Remission Management in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Is It Reliable?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Hemato
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/hemato4010007
hemato-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cardiotoxicity of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Philadelphia-Positive Leukemia Patients

by
Adriatik Berisha
1,2,
Angelo Placci
3 and
Pier Paolo Piccaluga
4,5,*
1
Department of Hematology, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo
2
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Parma University Hospital, 43126 Parma, Italy
4
Biobank of Research and Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology “L. and A. Seràgnoli”, IRCCS Azienda Opedaliera-Universitaria S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40137 Bologna, Italy
5
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna School of Medicine, 40137 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hemato 2023, 4(1), 68-75; https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato4010007
Submission received: 5 December 2022 / Revised: 21 February 2023 / Accepted: 22 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Memorial Issue Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Michele Baccarani: An Excellent Hematologist on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the past twenty years, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially changed the therapeutic landscape and the clinical outcome of several cancers, including Philadelphia-chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic syndromes, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and others. Despite the obvious advantages offered in terms of efficacy and the overall safety profile, this new class of agents presents novel side effects, sometimes different from those induced by conventional chemotherapy. Among others, the potential cardiac toxicity, characterized by possible arrhythmias and the highest rates of cardiac ischemic disease and heart failure, were predominantly investigated. In this article, the authors review the most significant evidence in this regard, highlighting the overall benefit of TKI usage and the need for careful monitoring, especially in elderly patients.

1. Background

Cancer treatment has historically encompassed, besides surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Both these approaches aim to target and kill proliferating cells, interfering on various levels with correct DNA replication. Despite potential benefits and efficacy, as in the case of many hematological malignancies, such as acute leukemias and lymphomas, targeting proliferating cells is relatively unspecific; therefore, side effects are common, as most non-neoplastic diving cells are affected, including bone marrow cells and mucosal epithelia. Indeed, as chemotherapy resistance occurs frequently, higher doses were adopted, which overcame resistance in some instances. Furthermore, high-dose chemotherapy (associated or not with chemotherapy) were also used as conditioning regimes for stem cell transplantations. However, as expected, the higher efficacy was paralleled by higher toxicity.
Furthermore, specific chemotherapy agents can also present a peculiar toxic profile on non-dividing cells as in the case of anthracyclines, which induce dose-dependent cumulative toxicity on myocardial cells.
In order to increase the clinical efficacy and reduce the overall toxicity in the past two decades, so-called targeted agents were introduced as anticancer treatment, leading to substantial benefits in many cases. Such approaches are aimed to more or less selectively target neoplastic cells by inhibiting specific cellular pathways known to be relevant for cancer cell survival. At the same time, as their effects are selectively targeted to cancer cells, these new drugs came with the promise of significantly reduced side effects, therefore named “smart” or “intelligent” chemotherapy.
The most striking examples of targeted therapies for cancer consist of anti-leukemia therapies; specifically, all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) for acute promyelocytic leukemia and imatinib mesylate for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The latter was the first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and profoundly changed the history of CML [1]. CML, in fact, could be cured only by allogeneic stem cell transplantation, a procedure at that time largely limited by toxicity in older patients and donor availability in younger patients. Imatinib and second/third-generation TKIs, by contrast, were able to induce long-term molecular complete remission in a remarkably high percentage of patients. Of note, this was paralleled by an excellent toxicity profile, which allowed long-term treatment in an outpatient setting.
However, TKIs can induce, as any other targeted regimen, mild to serious side effects, including cardiotoxicity. Since most CML patients are 65 years or older, this is particularly relevant, as many patients may present a concomitant cardiovascular disease together with CML.
Recently, a large Italian study reporting the real-life data of a cohort including 656 CML patients in the chronic phase and treated with second- or third-generation TKIs indicated that cardiovascular (CV) events significantly affected overall survival [1]. In particular, 12/37 deaths were related to CV complications. The 15-year CV mortality-free survival was 93%. Patients aged ≥65 years showed a significant lower CV mortality-free survival (72.1 ± 13.1% vs. 95.8 ± 2.7, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.005) and a positive history of AOEs (p = 0.04) were confirmed to be significantly associated with a lower CV mortality-free survival [1]. These data highlighted the need for careful clinical monitoring and adequate prevention strategies.
In this article, the authors review the main evidence about TKI-induced cardiotoxicity (summarized in Table 1), focusing on the main clinical trials that led to drug approvals, reviews, and real-life data.

2. Imatinib Mesylate-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Imatinib mesylate (formerly STI571, Glivec®, Novartis, CH) is an oral selective inhibitor of abelson (ABL1), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) alpha and beta, and KIT tyrosine kinases (TK) [2]. The mechanism of action of imatinib is a function of its ability to target proteins involved in the pathogenesis of specific cancer types. In particular, imatinib is the first-line agent for the treatment of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive (Ph-pos, that is, BCR-ABL1 translocation-positive) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) [3], because it inhibits the TK activity of the leukemogenic BCR-ABL1-encoded fusion protein [4]. In addition, it is currently licensed for the treatment of Ph-pos acute lymphoid leukemia (Ph-pos ALL), hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) with FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement, MDS/MPD associated with PDGFR gene rearrangements, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) [2].
Soon after its introduction into clinical practice, the enthusiasm for the clinical success of imatinib was tempered by the observation of its possible cardiotoxicity, documented both in a clinical setting and in experimental models [5]. In particular, Kerkelä et al. reported ten individuals with CML who developed severe congestive heart failure while being treated with imatinib [5]. In addition, they showed that imatinib-treated mice developed left ventricular contractile dysfunction and concluded that cardiotoxicity is an unanticipated side effect of ABL1 inhibition by imatinib. Furthermore, in the same issue of Nature Medicine, an accompanying News and Views article pointed out that TK inhibitors are plagued by cardiotoxic side effects [6].
Ribeiro and colleagues investigated the possible cardiotoxicity of imatinib in a prospective study [7]. They included 103 CML patients treated with imatinib and 57 patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorders not treated with imatinib in order to evaluate its cardiotoxicity. There was no statistical difference regarding cardiac symptoms and signs, BNP levels, and echocardiographic measurements for the imatinib and control groups, except for peripheral edema, which was more frequent in the imatinib group but not however related to cardiac dysfunction. Four patients in the imatinib group presented a B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level >100 pg/mL, but only one of them with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Overall, imatinib was not related to the systematic deterioration of cardiac function, although the possibility of isolated cases of cardiotoxicity could not be excluded. Indeed, this study had some limitations as the sample size probably did not allow the recognition of very rare adverse effects. However, this study was prospective and the included patients received imatinib for a long period (at least 24 months) [7].
Notably, these results are consistent with those reported by several groups [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. In particular, 6 reports including 5586 patients affected by Ph-pos CML/ALL (N = 4123), GIST (N = 1144), or other rare malignant disease (N = 319) cured at different European and American Institutions. History and clinical parameters, with special attention to symptoms of heart failure or cardiac disease were evaluated. In one study, N-terminal pro BNP and serum cardiac troponin were considered [14]. Overall, very few patients (0–0.6%) had cardiac events, including congestive heart failure and cardiac death. Notably, in all instances, these patients were either of advanced age or presented with personal history of cardiac disease before entering imatinib treatment.
The mechanism through which imatinib might affect myocardial cells is not well understood. In fact, the exact role of ABL1 cardiomyocytes is not clear since it mediates oxidant stress-induced death in fibroblasts and is protective in osteoclasts [15]. If analogous protection is offered to cardiac cells, its inhibition might certainly favor oxidative-stress induced myocardial injury [16]. In addition, experimentally, it was shown that JNK activation may be responsible for the cardiac toxicity observed with imatinib, and the inhibition of the JNK pathway markedly reduces the collapse of the mitochondrial membrane potential and cell death [16,17]. Indeed, JNK inhibition (achieved, for example, by a methylated form of imatinib) was shown to be associated with significant cardiotoxicity reduction without affecting the therapeutic effects [16,18].
Even greater attention to their potential cardiotoxicity was given to second- and third-generation TKIs, including nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib. In fact, they come with either more powerful activity on BCR-ABL1 and/or more pronounced off-target activity.

3. Dasatinib-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Dasatinib (BMS-354825) is a second-generation oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets BCR-ABL and SRC kinases. Dasatinib has 325-fold greater potency vs. imatinib in cell lines transduced with wild-type BCR-ABL1 and is active against 18 out of 19 BCR-ABL1 mutations tested with imatinib resistance. Dasatinib inhibits BCR-ABL1, the SRC family of kinases (SRC, LCK, YES, and FYN), KIT, EPHA2, and PDGFRs at nanomolar concentrations. Dasatinib was active in vitro in several imatinib-sensitive or imatinib-resistant leukemic cell lines and inhibited the growth of CML and acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines overexpressing BCR-ABL1.
While dasatinib potently inhibits BCR-ABL1, it is not a highly selective kinase inhibitor and may have off-target effects. Therefore, the risk of side effects, different or more pronounced than observed with imatinib, has to be faced. In this regard, Dr. Brave and colleagues showed that the acute and chronic toxicities of dasatinib in pre-clinical studies included cardiovascular toxicities, including QT prolongation in vitro and increased systolic, diastolic, and arterial blood pressure in animals. In addition, vascular and cardiac fibrosis, cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial necrosis, hemorrhage of the valves, ventricle, and atrium, and cardiac inflammation were noted in toxicology studies [19]. Consistently, Wong et al. showed that dasatinib could actually prolong QT interval of patients a from review of clinical profiles of dasatinib-treated patients with imatinib-resistance [20]. Finally, the DASISION trial study, randomly comparing dasatinib vs. imatinib in the treatment of naïve CML patients, indicated that the risk of arterial ischemic events was 5% during dasatinib treatment at a daily dose of 100 mg [21].
Overall, although dasatinib can be considered a relatively safe drug, QT monitoring before and during treatment are recommended.

4. Nilotinib-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Nilotinib (Tasigna) is a BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias (CML and ALL) in first or subsequent lines. Interestingly, in contrast to imatinib, the cellular uptake of nilotinib was independent of active transporter expression, so that systemic exposure is likely to be more closely related to patient response. Dr. Kim and colleagues reported on the clinical cardiac safety profile of nilotinib [22]; in this study, considering 81 patients with a median treatment duration of 26 months, they found that 16 out of the 81 patients (20%) had new electrocardiographic changes [22]. In this regard, Dr. Wendy et al. found, in an in vitro model, that nilotinib at pharmacologically relevant concentrations might be less toxic to cardiac cells than imatinib and dasatinib. In fact, despite inducing decreased leukemic cell viability, unlike imatinib and dasatinib, nilotinib did not significantly affect the mitochondrial membrane potential integrity under identical experimental conditions [23]. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms of the observed cardiotoxicities in the clinical setting may be different differ between imatinib and nilotinib. Indeed, besides direct effects on myocardial cells, a multicenter case series study suggested that a subset of patients treated with nilotinib was developing severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In the original study, 11 (6.2%) of 179 patients had severe PAD, with 8 patients requiring angioplasty, 8 patients requiring stent placement, and 4 patients requiring subsequent lower limb amputation [24].
Despite that, long-term follow-up studies revealed an overall safe profile of nilotinib, with the remarkable clinical efficacy largely exceeding the risk of toxicities, including cardiac toxicity [25].

5. Ponatinib and Cardiotoxicity

Ponatinib is a potent TKI, approved for the treatment of Ph-pos leukemias resistant to imatinib, due to its ability to inhibit mutated forms of ABL1, including those carrying the T315I mutation.
In a phase II trial, 18/449 patients died during the study [26,27]. Among other side effects, cardiovascular ones were well-documented. In particular, vascular occlusion occurred in 23% of cases, and some patients experienced fatal myocardial infarction [26,28,29,30]. Furthermore, treatment with ponatinib was also associated with cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (CHF) [26,28,29,30,31]. Noteworthy, such cardiac events were observed at any age, in the presence or absence of cardiovascular risk factors. Overall, the risk of severe cardiovascular events was estimated to be around 9% in patients receiving ponatinib [26].
Singh and colleagues deeply explored the possible molecular mechanisms underlying ponatinib toxicity on myocardial cells [26]. They found that selective FGFR inhibition contributes minimally to the ponatinib-induced cardiotoxicity. Conversely, they showed that ponatinib inhibits cardiac pro-survival signaling pathways AKT and extra-cellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and induces cardiomyocyte apoptosis [26]. Of note, strengthening AKT and ERK signals through the administration of neuregulin-1β was effective in preventing ponatinib-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis [26]. Importantly, in the case of aorta and megakaryocytes, the pro-apoptotic effect of ponatinib leads to a prothrombotic state and hyperactive platelets [32].
Overall, it should be considered that ponatininb has a very broad spectrum of TKI inhibition [33], and this wide spectrum of activity leads to its toxicity.

6. Other TKIs and Cardiotoxicity

Beside the TKIs used for the treatment of Ph-pos leukemias, other TKIs have been successfully introduced in the treatment pipelines of several solid cancers, including among others sorafenib, sunitinib, lapatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib. Sorafenib is a multi-target TKI, inhibiting KIT, PDGFRB, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) 2 and 3, BRAF, RAF1, and FLT3. It is used for several malignancies, including renal cell cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, it was also used in peripheral T-cell lymphomas [34]. Despite not common, sorafenib is well-known to induce acute coronary symptoms, including myocardial infarction, in about 3% of patients [16,35]. Both RAF1 and VEGFR inhibition have been postulated to be responsible for such events: on the one hand, RAF1 protects myocardial cells from oxidative stress; on the other hand, the activity on VEGFRs may lead to the reduction of capillary permeability and increased pressure load, leading to hypertrophy of the heart and subsequently congestive heart failure [16].
Sunitinib targets VEGFRs 1–3, KIT, RET, PDGFRA/B, FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), and the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R). It is approved for first- and second-line treatments of solid cancers, including renal cell carcinoma and GIST. Notably, a remarkable percentage of patients receiving this agent sunitinib developed hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, and other cardiac events [16]. Therefore, careful attention and cardiologic monitoring is recommended in all patients treated with sunitinib.
Lapatinib induced a decrease in LVEF > 20% in some instances when used for treating metastatic breast cancer, leading to treatment suspension. However, for unknown reasons, the effect was definitely less common than with trastuzumab, the monoclonal antibody targeting the same receptor, ERBB2 [16].
By contrast, no significant cardiotoxic effects have been reported as far as the epidermal growth factor receptors inhibitors (gefitinib and erlotinib) are concerned [16].

7. Arterial Disease and TKIs

In a recent meta-analysis, Dr. Mulas and colleagues investigated the role of second- and third-generation TKIs in inducing hypertension in CML patients [36]. In their pooled analysis, the authors found that hypertension is a common complication of TKIs; in particular, the incidence was 10% for all new-generation TKIs, with a remarkably higher prevalence in patients receiving ponatinib (17%). The comparison with the first-generation imatinib confirmed that ponatinib was associated with the highest risk (RR 9.21; 95% CI; p = 0.0002). In addition, it showed that also nilotinib was associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension (RR 2; 95% CI; p = 0.0002) [36].
In a large cohort of 192 patients with hypertension at CML diagnosis who were treated with second- or third-generation TKIs, the efficacy of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs)] in the prevention of AOEs was evaluated and compared with other drug classes [37]. The 5-year cumulative incidence of AOEs was about 33%. Patients with SCORE ≥ 5% (high/very-high) showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (33.7 ± 7.6% vs. 13.6 ± 4.8%, p = 0.006). The AOE incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with RAS inhibitors (14.8 ± 4.2% vs. 44 ± 1%, p < 0.001, HR = 0.283). The difference in the low and intermediate Sokal risk group was confirmed, but not in the high-risk group, where a lower RAS expression has been reported. The authors concluded that RAS inhibitors may represent an optimal treatment in patients with hypertension and CML, treated with second- or third-generation TKIs [37].
Interestingly, CML patients with a previous history of arterial occlusive events (AOE) and treated with second- or third-generation TKIs have a significant risk of recurrent events even in the presence of secondary prophylaxis [38]. Based on such evidence, individualized treatment is needed to optimize secondary prevention. In a study by Caocci et al., it was shown that the 60-month cumulative incidence rate of recurrent AOEs was about 48%. Despite a history of AOE, 10 patients (16%) included in the study were not receiving secondary preventive treatments such as an antiaggregant. Overall, seventeen recurrent AOEs were observed, while three cardiovascular-related deaths were reported [38]. Patients receiving nilotinib and ponatinib showed a higher incidence of recurrent AOEs (76.7 ± 14.3% and 64 ± 20.1%, respectively) than those treated with dasatinib and bosutinib (44 ± 24.2% and 30.5 ± 15.5%, respectively) (p = 0.01). Only treatment with a second- or third-generation TKI given as second or subsequent line therapy showed a significant association with an increased incidence of recurrent AOE (p = 0.039) [38].

8. Conclusions

The introduction of imatinib and other TK inhibitors has prompted important changes in the management of CML and other diseases. Particularly, as compared to conventional chemotherapy, not only was treatment efficacy significantly enhanced, but the toxicity profile was remarkably reduced. However, although targeted therapies are overall considered less toxic and better tolerated by patients compared with older chemotherapy drugs, certain complications can be very serious [16]. In addition, TKI are usually administered for prolonged periods of time, thus facilitating the occurrence, even later, of adverse events. Cardiac toxicity, in particular, may range from asymptomatic subclinical abnormalities such as electrocardiographic changes and left ventricular ejection fraction decline to life-threatening events such as congestive heart failure and acute coronary syndromes [16,39]. Overall, the available data on cardiac toxicity do not weaken the overall risk–benefit profile of TKIs, although careful evaluation and monitoring is warranted in elderly patients as well as when pre-existing cardiac dysfunction is documented [1,40,41,42,43].

Funding

This work was supported by BolognAIL (2020, Piccaluga), RFO DIMES (2018–2022 Piccaluga), and FIRB Futura 2011 RBFR12D1CB (Piccaluga).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is in memoriam of Prof. Michele Baccarani (1942–2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Caocci, G.; Mulas, O.; Annunziata, M.; Luciano, L.; Abruzzese, E.; Bonifacio, M.; Orlandi, E.M.; Albano, F.; Galimberti, S.; Iurlo, A.; et al. Long-term mortality rate for cardiovascular disease in 656 chronic myeloid leukaemia patients treated with second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 301, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Piccaluga, P.P.; Rondoni, M.; Paolini, S.; Rosti, G.; Martinelli, G.; Baccarani, M. Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2007, 7, 1597–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baccarani, M.; Saglio, G.; Goldman, J.; Hochhaus, A.; Simonsson, B.; Appelbaum, F.; Apperley, J.; Cervantes, F.; Cortes, J.; Deininger, M.; et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: Recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2006, 108, 1809–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Druker, B.J.; Tamura, S.; Buchdunger, E.; Ohno, S.; Segal, G.M.; Fanning, S.; Zimmermann, J.; Lydon, N.B. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kerkela, R.; Grazette, L.; Yacobi, R.; Iliescu, C.; Patten, R.; Beahm, C.; Walters, B.; Shevtsov, S.; Pesant, S.; Clubb, F.J.; et al. Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 908–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mann, D.L. Targeted cancer therapeutics: The heartbreak of success. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 881–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ribeiro, A.L.; Marcolino, M.S.; Bittencourt, H.N.; Barbosa, M.M.; Nunes, M.D.C.P.; Xavier, V.F.; Clementino, N.C. An evaluation of the cardiotoxicity of imatinib mesylate. Leuk. Res. 2008, 32, 1809–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rosti, G.; Martinelli, G.; Baccarani, M. In reply to ‘Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate’. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 15, author reply –6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Atallah, E.; Kantarjian, H.; Cortes, J. In reply to ‘Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate’. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 14, author reply 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hatfield, A.; Owen, S.; Pilot, P.R. In reply to ‘Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate’. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 13, author reply 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gambacorti-Passerini, C.; Tornaghi, L.; Franceschino, A.; Piazza, R.; Corneo, G.; Pogliani, E. In reply to ‘Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate’. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 13–14, author reply 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Atallah, E.; Durand, J.B.; Kantarjian, H.; Cortes, J. Congestive heart failure is a rare event in patients receiving imatinib therapy. Blood 2007, 110, 1233–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Verweij, J.; Casali, P.G.; Kotasek, D.; Cesne, A.L.; Reichard, P.; Judson, I.R.; Issels, R.; van Oosterom, A.T.; Glabbeke, M.V.; Blay, J.-Y.; et al. Imatinib does not induce cardiac left ventricular failure in gastrointestinal stromal tumours patients: Analysis of EORTC-ISG-AGITG study 62005. Eur. J. Cancer 2007, 43, 974–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Perik, P.J.; Rikhof, B.; de Jong, F.A.; Verweij, J.; Gietema, J.A.; van der Graaf, W.T. Results of plasma N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin monitoring in GIST patients do not support the existence of imatinib-induced cardiotoxicity. Ann. Oncol. 2008, 19, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, B.; Wang, X.; Rasheed, N.; Hu, Y.; Boast, S.; Ishii, T.; Nakayama, K.; Nakayama, K.I.; Goff, S.P. Distinct roles of c-Abl and Atm in oxidative stress response are mediated by protein kinase C delta. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1824–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Orphanos, G.S.; Ioannidis, G.N.; Ardavanis, A.G. Cardiotoxicity induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Acta Oncol. 2009, 48, 964–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Aoki, H.; Kang, P.M.; Hampe, J.; Yoshimura, K.; Noma, T.; Matsuzaki, M.; Izumo, S. Direct activation of mitochondrial apoptosis machinery by c-Jun N-terminal kinase in adult cardiac myocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 10244–10250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fernandez, A.; Sanguino, A.; Peng, Z.; Oztürk, E.; Chen, J.; Crespo, A.; Wulf, S.; Shavrin, A.; Qin, C.; Ma, J.; et al. An anticancer C-Kit kinase inhibitor is reengineered to make it more active and less cardiotoxic. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 4044–4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brave, M.; Goodman, V.; Kaminskas, E.; Farrell, A.; Timmer, W.; Pope, S.; Harapanhalli, R.; Saber, H.; Morse, D.; Bullock, J.; et al. Sprycel for chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia resistant to or intolerant of imatinib mesylate. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wong, S.F. New dosing schedules of dasatinib for CML and adverse event management. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2009, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kantarjian, H.M.; Shah, N.P.; Cortes, J.E.; Baccarani, M.; Agarwal, M.B.; Undurraga, M.S.; Wang, J.; Ipiña, J.J.K.; Kim, D.-W.; Ogura, M.; et al. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood 2012, 119, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, T.D.; le Coutre, P.; Schwarz, M.; Grille, P.; Levitin, M.; Fateh-Moghadam, S.; Giles, F.J.; Dörken, B.; Haverkamp, W.; Köhncke, C. Clinical cardiac safety profile of nilotinib. Haematologica 2012, 97, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Freebern, W.J.; Fang, H.S.; Slade, M.D.; Wells, S.; Canale, J.; Megill, J.; Grubor, B.; Shi, H.; Fletcher, A.; Lombardo, L.; et al. In Vitro Cardiotoxicity Potential Comparative Assessments of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapies: Dasatinib, Imatinib and Nilotinib. Blood 2007, 110, 4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Le Coutre, F.; Rea, D.; Abruzzese, E.; Dombret, H.; Trawinska, M.M.; Herndlhofer, S.; Dorken, B.; Valent, P. Severe Peripheral Arterial Disease During Nilotinib Therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011, 103, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kantarjian, H.M.; Hughes, T.P.; Larson, R.A.; Kim, D.-W.; Issaragrisil, S.; le Coutre, P.; Etienne, G.; Boquimpani, C.; Pasquini, R.; Clark, R.E.; et al. Long-term outcomes with frontline nilotinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 10-year analysis. Leukemia 2021, 35, 440–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Singh, A.P.; Glennon, M.S.; Umbarkar, P.; Gupte, M.; Galindo, C.L.; Zhang, Q.; Force, T.; Becker, J.R.; Lal, H. Ponatinib-induced cardiotoxicity: Delineating the signalling mechanisms and potential rescue strategies. Cardiovasc. Res. 2019, 115, 966–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cortes, J.E.; Kim, D.-W.; Pinilla-Ibarz, J.; Le Coutre, P.; Paquette, R.; Chuah, C.; Nicolini, F.E.; Apperley, J.F.; Khoury, H.J.; Talpaz, M.; et al. PACE Investigators. A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 1783–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hoy, S.M. Ponatinib: A review of its use in adults with chronic myeloid leukaemia or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Drugs 2014, 74, 793–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ICLUSIG® (Ponatinib) Tablets for Oral Use. U.S. FDA. 2018. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/203469s030lbl.pdf (accessed on 4 December 2022).
  30. Prasad, V.; Mailankody, S. The accelerated approval of oncologic drugs: Lessons from ponatinib. JAMA 2014, 311, 353–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jain, P.; Kantarjian, H.; Jabbour, E.; Gonzalez, G.N.; Borthakur, G.; Pemmaraju, N.; Daver, N.; Gachimova, E.; Ferrajoli, A.; Kornblau, S.; et al. Ponatinib as first-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase: A phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2015, 2, e376–e383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Merkulova, A.; Mitchell, S.C.; Stavrou, E.X.; Forbes, G.L.; Schmaier, A.H. Ponatinib treatment promotes arterial thrombosis and hyperactive platelets. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 2312–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zeng, P.; Schmaier, A. Ponatinib and other CML Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Thrombosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gibson, J.F.; Foss, F.; Cooper, D.; Seropian, S.; Irizarry, D.; Barbarotta, L.; Lansigan, F. Pilot study of sorafenib in relapsed or refractory peripheral and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2014, 167, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bayer Pharmaceuticals. Nexavar (Sorafenib) Prescribing Information. 2009. Available online: http://www.univgraph.com/bayer/inserts/nexavar.pdf (accessed on 4 December 2022).
  36. Mulas, O.; Caocci, G.; Mola, B.; La Nasa, G. Arterial Hypertension and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mulas, O.; Caocci, G.; Stagno, F.; Bonifacio, M.; Annunziata, M.; Luciano, L.; Orlandi, E.M.; Abruzzese, E.; Sgherza, N.; Martino, B.; et al. Renin angiotensin system inhibitors reduce the incidence of arterial thrombotic events in patients with hypertension and chronic myeloid leukemia treated with second- or third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Ann. Hematol. 2020, 99, 1525–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Caocci, G.; Mulas, O.; Bonifacio, M.; Abruzzese, E.; Galimberti, S.; Orlandi, E.M.; Iurlo, A.; Annunziata, M.; Luciano, L.; Castagnetti, F.; et al. Recurrent arterial occlusive events in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and role of secondary prevention. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 288, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barber, M.C.; Mauro, M.J.; Moslehi, J. Cardiovascular care of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2017, 2017, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kantarjian, H.; Pasquini, R.; Hamerschlak, N.; Rousselot, P.; Holowiecki, J.; Jootar, S.; Robak, T.; Khoroshko, N.; Masszi, T.; Skotnicki, A.; et al. Dasatinib or high-dose imatinib for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of first-line imatinib: A randomized phase 2 trial. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2007, 109, 5143–5150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Giles, F.J.; Yin, O.Q.; Sallas, W.M.; Le Coutre, P.D.; Woodman, R.C.; Ottmann, O.; Baccarani, M.; Kantarjian, H.M. Nilotinib population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013, 69, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Quintás-Cardama, A.; Kantarjian, H.M.; Luthra, R.; o’Brien, S.; Jabbour, E.; Borthakur, G.; Ravandi, F.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Faderl, S.; Konopleva, M.; et al. Efficacy of Frontline Nilotinib Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Early Chronic Phase (CML-CP). Blood 2011, 118, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jabbour, E.; Kantarjian, H.M.; Saglio, G.; Steegmann, J.L.; Shah, N.P.; Boqué, C.; Chuah, C.; Pavlovsky, C.; Mayer, J.; Cortes, J.; et al. Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2014, 123, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and type of reported cardiotoxicity.
Table 1. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and type of reported cardiotoxicity.
AgentTyrosine Kinase TargetsType of Cardiac Toxicity
Imatinib mesylateBCR-ABL1, KIT, PDGFRsCHF, LVEF depression
DasatinibBCR-ABL1, KIT, PDGFRs, SRC FamilyQT prolongation, peripheral edema, pericardial effusion
NilotinibBCR-ABL1, KIT, PDGFRsQT prolongation
PonatinibBCR-ABL1, KIT, PDGFRsMI, CHF, cardiomyopathy, vascular occlusion
SunitinibVEGFR 1–3, RET, PDGFRs, KIT, FLT3, CSF1RHypertension, LVEF depression, CHF, MI
SorafenibVEGFR 2&3, KIT, PDGFRB, FLT3, RAF1, BRAFAcute coronary syndrome, MI, hypertension
LapatinibEGFR, ERBB2Asymptomatic LVEF depression
CHF: Chronic heart failure; LVEF: Left ventricle ejection fraction; MI: Myocardial infarction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berisha, A.; Placci, A.; Piccaluga, P.P. Cardiotoxicity of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Philadelphia-Positive Leukemia Patients. Hemato 2023, 4, 68-75. https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato4010007

AMA Style

Berisha A, Placci A, Piccaluga PP. Cardiotoxicity of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Philadelphia-Positive Leukemia Patients. Hemato. 2023; 4(1):68-75. https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato4010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berisha, Adriatik, Angelo Placci, and Pier Paolo Piccaluga. 2023. "Cardiotoxicity of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Philadelphia-Positive Leukemia Patients" Hemato 4, no. 1: 68-75. https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato4010007

APA Style

Berisha, A., Placci, A., & Piccaluga, P. P. (2023). Cardiotoxicity of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Philadelphia-Positive Leukemia Patients. Hemato, 4(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato4010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop