Next Article in Journal
Comparative Potential of Chitinase and Chitosanase from the Strain Bacillus thuringiensis B-387 for the Production of Antifungal Chitosan Oligomers
Previous Article in Journal
Innovations in Proteomic Technologies and Artificial Neural Networks: Unlocking Milk Origin Identification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combined Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Agro-Industrial Residues on Pleurotus columbinus Production and Intra-Cellular Polysaccharide Synthesis

by
Marianna Dedousi
1,2,
Chrysavgi Gardeli
2,
Seraphim Papanikolaou
3 and
Panagiota Diamantopoulou
1,*
1
Laboratory of Edible Fungi, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization—Dimitra, 1 Sof. Venizelou, 14123 Lykovryssi, Greece
2
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece
3
Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
BioTech 2025, 14(2), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech14020034
Submission received: 27 February 2025 / Revised: 8 April 2025 / Accepted: 15 April 2025 / Published: 2 May 2025

Abstract

:
Spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds from espresso production (SCG), faba bean harvest residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PS) wheat straw (WS) (control) agro-industrial waste were combined in different ratios, with or without supplements (wheat bran, soybean flour), to create novel substrates for Pleurotus columbinus growth. The impact of the substrates on the mycelial growth rate (Kr), biomass production, laccase, total cellulases and carbohydrate synthesis, along with the C and N consumption by P. columbinus, were examined in fully colonized substrates. The incubation period, earliness and biological efficiency (B.E.) (%) were also determined. Then, the intracellular polysaccharide (ICP) contents of the P. columbinus produced mushrooms were evaluated in the most promising substrates. P. columbinus was grown successfully in a wide range of C/N ratios of substrates and the fastest Kr (7.6 mm/d) was detected on the 70 SMS-30 FBR, without supplements, whereas substrates consisting of SCG enhanced biomass production (700.0–803.7 mg/g d.w.). SMS and PS or SCG led to the shortest incubation and earliness period of P. columbinus. The C content was reduced and the N content was substantially increased in all the colonized substrates. The 70 SMS-30 FBR and 80 SMS considerably enhanced the laccase production (up to 59,933.4 U/g d.w.) and substrates consisting of PS promoted total cellulases activities. Greater amounts of carbohydrates (3.8–17.4 mg/g d.w.) than that in the control were recorded for all the substrates. The combination of SMS and SCG or WS led to the highest B.E. values (59.3–87.1%) and ICP amounts (34.7–45.9%, w/w), regardless of the supplement addition. These findings support the effective utilization of agro-industrial waste in P. columbinus cultivation, producing high-value-added compounds and supporting mushroom growth.
Key Contribution: This study explores the suitability of novel cultivation substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate combined with agro-industrial residues in P. columbinus growth. This work highlights the potential production of enzymes such as laccase and total cellulases by P. columbinus and its high biological efficiencies.

1. Introduction

The cultivation of edible mushrooms has been increased in the last years, as people world-wide include mushrooms in their everyday diets [1,2]. In addition to their unique culinary properties, mushrooms are low in calories and fat and rich in protein, including all nine essential amino acids, making them a valuable alternative to meat [3,4]. Along with the increase in global mushroom production, the by-products of the mushroom industry are also increasing. These by-products include misshapen mushrooms, mushroom stems and spent mushroom substrate (SMS), which is the most abundant, as three to five kilograms of this lignocellulosic by-product is generated per kilogram of fresh mushrooms [5]. This by-product is traditionally disposed of through landfilling, causing environmental issues.
The rapid expansion of the food industries and agricultural sector has led to the annual generation of substantial amounts of agro-industrial waste. Coffee is one of the world’s most widespread beverages. Spent coffee grounds (SCG) are the solid residues derived after coffee beverage preparation [6]. Most of these residues are commonly thrown directly in the trash and thus end up in landfills, creating environmental issues due to the significant amounts of toxic organic components (caffeine, tannins, polyphenols) that demand great quantities of oxygen to decompose [6,7]. Furthermore, a remarkable increase in the consumption of legumes has been noticed during the last decade, as they are considered a valuable protein source, especially for vegetarians [8]. Consequently, the production of the post harvesting residues of legumes has increased at the same pace. Pisum sativum L., included in the Fabaceae family, is the second most important crop after the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and is cultivated in many countries, including Greece [9,10]. Inappropriate management of the post harvesting residues of legumes, like burning, leads to air pollution. Another agricultural by-product produced considerably in the Mediterranean region is pistachio shells (PS), derived from Pistacia vera L. cultivation. This waste is mainly subjected to dumping and burning without any treatment [11].
An environmentally friendly way to handle all the above lignocellulosic residues is their reutilization as substrates in mushroom cultivation through solid-state fermentation (SSF). In most cases, the final mixtures of these residues are supplemented with carbon- and nitrogen-rich materials, such as wheat bran and soybean flour. However, substrates without supplements have also been tested and, in many cases, their absence did not result in a negative effect on fungal growth [12,13,14]. This constitutes an economical, viable method of substrate preparation. Oyster mushrooms (those of the genus Pleurotus) especially are able to colonize and grow on a wide range of agro-industrial residues, owing to their complex enzymatic system [15]. Ligninolytic enzymes, such as laccase, one of the oxidative enzymes that is secreted in large amounts by oyster mushrooms, and hydrolytic enzymes, like cellulases, have many applications in the food and beverage industry [16,17,18]. Furthermore, during SSF, many bioactive compounds are synthesized by mushrooms, such as N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, which constitutes the structural polysaccharide of the fungal cell wall and carbohydrates, which appear to have exceptional medicinal properties [19].
Pleurotus columbinus, commonly known as blue oyster mushroom, is well known for its attractive color and savory flavor, which is almost poultry-like, yet it has not been examined to a great extent for its nutritional value and ability to colonize many different substrates (lignocellulosic residues and agro-industrial wastes). Other researchers have cultivated P. columbinus on various residues, such as Cynodon dactylon grass weed, African mahogany tree leaves, faba bean straw, rice straw, wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse [20], chopped office papers, cardboard, sawdust and plant fibers [21]. To the best of our knowledge, no other research has been conducted on evaluating SMS, alone or combined with agro-industrial residues, as a cultivation substrate for P. columbinus SSF. Generally, only a few studies have examined the suitability of non-supplemented substrates in oyster mushrooms. Furthermore, P. columbinus is suggested as a healthy food. It is a rich source of protein and high amounts of vitamin C and vitamin D have been detected in its extracts [22,23]. Moreover, P. columbinus has high cellulolytic activities [24] and many researchers have mentioned its high antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, which offer potential applications in the formulation of food or medicinal supplements [22,25].
Thus, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of novel cultivation substrates consisting of SMS, alone or combined with agro-industrial residues, with or without supplements, in the growth of P. columbinus, a mushroom that has not been largely examined. A multifactor experimental design was used including numerous substrate compositions of SMS, SCG, fava bean harvest residues (FBR), PS and wheat straw (WS). The biomass, laccase and carbohydrate production were assessed in fully colonized substrates, along with the remaining carbon and nitrogen amounts. Initially, the selection of the most promising substrates for experiments in bags was based on the results of the P. columbinus growth rate conducted in a Petri dish. Then, essential parameters of the growth and fructification (incubation and earliness duration, biological efficiency) were determined, as well as the intra-cellular polysaccharide (ICP) contents in the P. columbinus-produced mushrooms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain and Spawn Preparation

Pleurotus columbinus (strain AMRL 198), maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), was obtained from the fungal culture collection of the Laboratory of Edible Fungi/Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products/Hellenic Agricultural Organization—Dimitra. Grain spawn of P. columbinus was prepared as previously described by Philippoussis et al. [26].

2.2. Substrates and Fermentation Parameters

All residues originated from Greek farms and industries. Spent mushroom substrate (SMS) was derived from the large-scale cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus mushrooms conducted by the agricultural industry, Manitus S.A., Paiania, Attica. Faba bean harvest residues (FBR) were obtained after the cultivation of Pisum sativum L. by the agricultural industry Okto Adelphia, on the Aegean island Schinoussa. Pistachio shells (PS) came from pistachio nut trees, Pistacia vera L., cultivated in the region of Megara, Attica. The industrial residue, spent coffee grounds from espresso production (SCG), was derived from a local coffee shop of Lycovryssi, Attica. Wheat straw (WS), the main commercial cultivation substrate for Pleurotus mushrooms, was used as the control substrate and in combination with SMS. All the residues were subjected to chemical analyses for their organic matter [27], total nitrogen and protein contents [28] and cellulose and lignin contents [29,30,31]. All samples were analyzed in triplicate.
Substrate formulations were prepared (on a dry substrate weight basis) by supplementing SMS and each residue with wheat bran (WB) and soybean flour (SF) (40:40:15:5; 60:20:15:5). Also, SMS and WS (control) with supplements (80:15:5) were tested. Otherwise, SMS was mixed with SCG, FBR, PS and WS (70:30, 50:50) and formed new substrates without any supplement, whereas one substrate consisted only of SMS (100 SMS). To prepare the substrates, WS and FBR were mechanically cut to 2–5 cm (cutting machine: Novital, mod. Magnum-4 V, Novelty, Palermo, Italy) and PS were milled to < 0.2 mm (analytical mill Janke & Kunkel, IKA-WERK, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany). After soaking in a specific quantity of tap water for ~12 h to achieve the optimum moisture content (60–75%), some substrates were supplemented with WB and SF (supplemented substrates), while others were utilized without supplements. An amount of 1% w/w calcium carbonate (CaCO3; SDS, Peypin, Bouches-du-Rhône, France) was added to all the substrates to obtain a pH value around 7.
Five glass Petri dishes (90 mm) were filled with each substrate and sterilized twice at T = 121 ± 1 °C (1 h, 1.1 atm). They were allowed to cool before they were aseptically inoculated with one agar plug (9 mm) cut from a P. columbinus colony grown previously on a PDA (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) Petri dish at 26 ± 0.5 °C. Then, they were incubated in a chamber (DRAWELL, mod. DW-LBI-400, Shanghai, China) at T = 26 ± 0.5 °C in the dark until the full colonization of the substrate. Petri dishes were used to investigate the ability of P. columbinus to colonize the different substrates via the evaluation of the mycelial growth rate (Kr) (mm/d) by measuring the visible penetration of mycelia into the substrate in two perpendicular directions every few days [26]. Based on this screening, three replicates of polypropylene-autoclavable bags (200 g) of each selected substrate were filled, sterilized twice (T = 121 ± 1 °C, 1 h, 1.1 atm) and then inoculated with 3–5% w/w (on fresh weight basis) P. columbinus grain spawn under aseptic conditions. Substrate colonization took place in a growth chamber (ENTERLAB, mod. GROW-1300 h, Terrassa, Spain) at T = 26 ± 0.5 °C and 85% relative air humidity in the dark until full colonization. After that, the conditions were adjusted for the fructification process (T = 18 ± 1 °C, RH: 90%, under cool white light provided by fluorescent lamps for 12 h/day; air exchange rates were controlled to maintain CO2 level < 1000 ppm). Two flushes of mushrooms were harvested. The bags were used to examine the incubation and earliness period (elapsed time between the day of substrate inoculation and the day of the first harvest), as well as the biological efficiency (BE%) (the ratio of the weight of fresh mushrooms per d.w. of substrate). Afterwards, the colonized substrates and harvested mushrooms were subjected to several analyses after they were frozen (T = −20 ± 1 °C), dried by a Heto LyoLab 3000 freeze-dryer (Heto-Holten Als, Lillerod, Denmark), milled and sieved.

2.3. Analytical Methods

The remaining carbon [27] and nitrogen (Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Method) [28] contents were determined in the fully colonized substrates. Furthermore, for the extraction of carbohydrates produced by P. columbinus on substrates, 2.88 mL distilled water was added to 2 g of fresh fermented substrate at T = 60 °C for 15 min [32]. Carbohydrates were measured according to Diamantopoulou et al. [33] and their concentration was determined by phenol–sulfuric acid assay [34], using glucose as the standard and expressed as equivalent of glucose.
For the laccase (EC 1.10.3.2) and total cellulases extraction, 20 mL phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH = 5.0; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was mixed with 2 g of fresh fermented substrate in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, which were agitated (T = 20–22 °C, 100 ± 5 rpm, 1 h) in a rotary shaker (ZHICHENG ZHWY 211B, Shanghai, China). After vacuum filtration (Whatman No. 2 paper filter, Whatman plc, Kent, UK) to remove the residual particles, the crude extracts were centrifuged at 10,500 rpm for 15 min at T = 4.0 ± 0.1 °C (Micro 22R, Hettich, Kirchlengern, Germany). The supernatants were kept at T = −20 ± 1 °C.
The laccase activity was measured spectrophotometrically with syringaldazine (4-hydroxy-3.5-dime-thoxybenzaldehydeazine; Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany) as the substrate [13]. The absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 525 nm (ε = 6.5 × 104 M−1 cm−1) (Jasco V-530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Tokyo, Japan). One unit of laccase is defined as the quantity of enzymes necessary to induce a change in absorbance of 0.001 per minute under the test conditions employed. The laccase activity was expressed in U/g of substrate.
The total cellulases activity was assayed according to the filter paper assay (FPase) method [35]. Briefly, the release of reducing sugars [36] was measured (spectrophotometrically at 540 nm, Jasco V-530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Tokyo, Japan) in a reaction mixture containing Whatman 50 mg No. 1 filter paper (1 × 6 cm strip, Whatman plc, Kent, UK) as the substrate in sodium citrate buffer (0.05 M, pH 4.8; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 50 °C after 60 min and T = 50 ± 1 °C. The total cellulases activities were expressed in U/g of substrate.
The quantity of the mycelial mass produced was estimated indirectly using the N-acetylglucosamine (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) method, formed from fungal chitin hydrolysis, as described by Economou et al. [13]. Glucosamine standard curves were obtained using various concentrations of N-acetylglucosamine. The glucosamine concentration was quantified spectrophotometrically at 650 nm (Jasco V-530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Tokyo, Japan) and the results were expressed as mg of biomass per g of dry substrate.
Finally, the intra-cellular polysaccharides (ICP) of mushrooms produced on substrates with statistically higher B.E. values than that of the control were quantified according to Diamantopoulou et al. [33] and Liang et al. [37]. In particular, 20 mL of 2.5 M HCl was used to hydrolyze 0.1 g of dried, powdered mushrooms at 100 °C for 20 min. The mixtures were neutralized to a pH of 7 using 2.5 M NaOH. Samples were filtered (through No. 2 Whatman filters, Whatman plc, Kent, UK) and the 3.5-dinitro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid (DNS) assay was applied to determine their ICP (expressed as glucose equivalents), measuring the absorbance at 540 nm [36] (Jasco V-530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Tokyo, Japan). All samples were analyzed in triplicate.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from a minimum of three replicates. Analysis of variance was followed by Duncan’s t-test at the 5% level of probability for assessing differences between means (Statgraphics Centurion XVII, version 17). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for determining the relationships (at significance levels of 0.05) between the variables.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Raw Materials, Substrate Analysis and Mycelium Growth Rate

To prepare the final mixtures of SMS and raw agro-industrial residues, their basic chemical properties were determined (Table 1). SCG presented the highest amount of C, N and protein (except for the supplements WB and SF). As shown in Table 2, there was a variety of C/N ratios of the final supplemented cultivation substrates (22.7–34.0% d.w.), whereas higher ratios in non-supplemented cultivation substrates were calculated in Table 3 (32.0–54.8% d.w.). These values are within the acceptable limits, as they support the growth of most mushroom species [26,38]. In a previous study, P. ostreatus was cultivated on substrates consisting of WS, SCG and olive pruning residues in different ratios and the C/N ratio ranged from 26 to 69 [39]. High cellulose and lignin contents were observed in substates consisting of WS and PS, respectively, regardless of the supplement addition.
Firstly (Figure 1), the effect of all the different substrates on P. columbinus growth was evaluated by examining its mycelium growth rate (Kr) (mm/d). P. columbinus grew successfully in all the substrates and the combination of SMS and FBR, without supplements 70 SMS-30 FBR led to the fastest Kr (7.6 mm/d). Among the highest Kr values were also detected on the 60 SMS-20 FBR (7.5 mm/d) and 50 SMS-50 PS (7.3 mm/d). In contrast, Philippoussis et al. [26] have mentioned the negative impact of PS substrates on Pleurotus strain growth. It is worth mentioning that the absence of additives in the final substrates did not negatively affect the Kr values. This has also been observed in Pleurotus citrinopileatus and P. ostreatus grown on different substrates with SMS and the hydroponic roots of leafy vegetables without supplements [12,40]. Additionally, Economou et al. [13] reported that the highest P. ostreatus and Pleurotus pulmonarius Kr values were observed in SMSs, without supplements, while the supplementation of SMS with WB and SF led to a decrease in the Kr. The slowest Kr values were recorded when P. columbinus was cultivated on 50 SMS-50 SCG (4.4 mm/d). The Kr values and C concentrations of the cultivation substrates were negatively and significantly related (r2 = −0.5368). In any case, the Kr values of this study are among the highest of those reported in the literature for Pleurotus cultivation on SMSs (1.76–8.60 mm/d) [13,41,42], indicating the suitability of these combinations, SMSs with agro-industrial residues, as cultivation mushroom substrates. Therefore, for the subsequent experiments (cultivation in polypropylene bags), ten substrates combining SMS and each agro-industrial residue with (and without) supplements were selected based on the results of the fastest Kr values (Table 4).

3.2. Analysis of Substrates After P. columbinus Colonization

All the selected substrates consisting of SMS and agro-industrial residues successfully supported the production of P. columbinus mushrooms during the experiment in small polypropylene bags. The incubation period lasted from 9 to 16 days (Table 4). It is important to mention that P. columbinus needed less time to fully colonize all the new, alternative substrates than the control one, while the substrates consisting of SMS and PS (40 SMS-40 PS, 50 SMS-50 PS) led to the shortest incubation period. Otherwise, the substrate composition did not influence the colonization period of P. ostreatus (7–9 days) [39,43]. Short cultivation periods in the mushroom industry are preferable to minimize the high risk of contamination [38]. In a previous study, P. columbinus colonized chopped office papers and cardboard within two weeks after spawning, similar to this study, whereas more time, up to four weeks, was needed in sawdust and plant fibers [21]. Also, a strong negative correlation was recorded for the incubation period and lignin concentration of the cultivation substrates (r2 = −0.941).
The differences in the biomass (279.2 to 803.7 mg/g d.w.) among the colonized substrates were statistically significant (Table 4). In particular, the results of the present study indicate the positive effect of SCG addition in biomass production. The greatest biomass production was observed in the non-supplemented substrates 70 SMS-30 SCG and in 60 SMS-20 SCG, biomass production was great enough (700.0 mg/g d.w.). Diamantis et al. [44] have also reported that the addition of coffee residue in WS and beech wood shavings led to a significant increase in the biomass production by P. ostreatus. Furthermore, the negative correlation between the growth rate and biomass production have been reported [45]. In the present study, the greatest biomass production (803.7 mg/g d.w.) and the lowest Kr (5.9 mm/d) were detected in the 70 SMS-30 SCG. In a previous study, significantly lower biomass (104.90–351.88 mg/g d.w.) was produced by P. ostreatus and P. eryngii cultivated on substrates consisting of SMS and agro-industrial residues [41].
The carbon (Crem, %) and nitrogen (Nrem, %) contents were also measured in the substrates after they were fully colonized by P. columbinus (Table 4). The Crem contents of these samples were reduced, while the highest reduction in the Crem was observed for the 60 SMS-20 WS. The decrease in C can be explained by the breakdown of organic matter in the substrate. Otherwise, the Nrem contents of the fully colonized substrates were substantially increased. The greatest change in the Nrem contents was detected for the 70 SMS-30 FBR. The increase in the N contents in substrates after colonization or harvest has already been mentioned in previous studies [46,47,48]. This increase may be related to the high protein content of the heavily grown mycelium in the substrate, or because fungi secrete proteinaceous extracellular enzymes by degrading the by-products during fermentation, which are metabolized [49]. As was expected, the initial C and N amounts on the cultivation substrates were highly positively correlated with the amounts of the Crem and Nrem (r2 = 0.7252 and r2 = 0.9051, respectively). Also, the Nrem was strong negatively correlated with the substrate C/N and cellulose (r2 = −0.8968 and −0.8926, respectively).

3.3. Laccase and Total Cellulases Production

Laccase activity is influenced by many factors, including the stage of SSF, the cultivation substrate, the fungal species and the availability of nutrient sources and their concentration [13,50]. In the present study, SMSs, supplemented (80 SMS, 60 SMS-20 SCG) or not (70 SMS-30 FBR, 100 SMS), improved the laccase production (34,646.4–59,933.4 U/g d.w.) by P. columbinus (Figure 2) with statistically significant differences from the control substrate (16,013.4 U/g d.w.), while the combination of SMS and PS led to the lowest laccase production. According to the literature, several additives have been reported to enhance laccase production in mushroom cultivation substrates [13,51,52]. In most of the cases of the present study, the additive supplementation had a positive impact on the laccase synthesis, but greater laccase activity was detected in the 70 SMS-30 FBR (non-supplemented) rather than in the 60 SMS-20 FBR (supplemented), indicating that laccase activity is influenced by a combination of factors. In a previous study, the maximum value of laccase enzyme activity was observed in the middle of commercial SMS colonization by P. pulmonarius (51,353 U/g d.w.), similar to the greatest laccase activity of the present study, while the greatest laccase activity for P. ostreatus was detected at the end of commercial SMS colonization (12,360 U/g d.w.) [53]. Dedousi et al. [41] also reported high laccase production, 62,539.03 U/g d.w., by P. ostreatus cultivated on commercial SMS at the end of the cultivation period. Additionally, P. columbinus presented the highest laccase activity in different media among other basidiomycetes [24]. It is noteworthy that the laccase activity was negatively correlated with the Crem (r2 = −0.6636).
The total cellulases activity ranged from 0.3 to 0.8 U/g d.w. among the substrates (Figure 3). All the substrates consisting of SMS (except for 60 SMS–20 SCG) enhanced the total celulases production by P. columbinus. The highest activity was recorded in 40 SMS–40 PS, while 50 SMS–50 PS also enhanced total cellulases production. On the contrary, it is important to mention that substrates consisting of PS had a negative effect on the laccase production. Khalil et al. [54] reported that, cultivated on sawdust, sugarcane bagasse and paddy straw, P. ostreatus produced 0.86–3.51 U/g total cellulases and Pleurotus sajor-caju produced 0.19–0.83 U/g, values similar to those of the present study. Higher total celulases production was recorded for P. ostreatus cultivated on wheat straw, tree leaves and apple and banana peels (1.6–3.4 U/mL) [55] than that of the present study. Whilst the ability of P. columbinus to produce total cellulases and generally hydrolytic enzymes has not been widely studied yet, Pleurotus spp. have been tested for their ability to produce not only total cellulases but also endoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.4) [41,56], exoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.91) [54,56] and β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) [56,57].
Many researchers have studied the synthesis of enzymes, as they have multiple applications in several industries, including food and dairy production. Although enzymes can be isolated from bacteria, plants and animals, their fungal origin is preferable due to the easy preparation and efficient production using inexpensive media.

3.4. Carbohydrate Production

Notable concentrations of carbohydrates were also produced during the P. columbinus growth in the different substrates containing SMS. The growth medium and the conditions of the culture and the fungi, both in submerged cultures or SSF, are the most crucial parameters for carbohydrate production [58,59]. Specifically, the carbohydrate concentration was negatively correlated with the substrates’ C (r2 = −0.6118), while a high positive correlation was detected with the Kr (r2 = 0.6437). According to Figure 4, statistically significant differences were noticed in the production of carbohydrates among the substrates. The SMS had a positive impact on the production of carbohydrates, as greater amounts of them were produced in all the SMS substrates than that of the control (2.6 mg/g d.w.). The highest amount was produced in the 70 SMS-30 FBR (17.4 mg/g d.w.). In general, the enhancement in the carbohydrate production in the non-supplemented substrates was greater than that in the corresponding supplemented ones. In a previous study, Economou et al. [53] reported significantly lower exopolysaccharide production by P. ostreatus (2.40 mg/g d.w.) and P. pulmonarius (3.18 mg/g d.w.) cultivated on SMS at the end of colonization. Similarly, Melanouri et al. [58] reported even lower exopolysaccharide production by P. ostreatus (0.73–1.82 mg/g d.w.), while greater amounts were produced by Ganoderma resinaceum (2.47–5.38 mg/g) and Lentinula edodes (1.64–5.68 mg/g). A much higher quantity of extracellular polysaccharides (33.32 g/L) was produced by P. sajor caju in submerged fermentation [60]. P. columbinus has not so far been studied regarding its ability to produce carbohydrates in liquid cultures or SSF, so the above results are of great interest. Since the fully colonized substrates by P. columbinus obtained considerable amounts of carbohydrates, the extraction of these bioactive compounds is really promising for their use in functional food or as valuable compounds for biotechnological applications with remarkable medicinal properties [61,62].

3.5. Evaluation of Substrates for P. columbinus Cultivation

All substrates had a positive impact on reducing the earliness period (Table 5). P. columbinus needed less time to complete the earliness period when it was cultivated on substrates consisting of SMS and SCG or PS, regardless of supplement presence or whether more time was needed on substrates consisting of WS. In the present study, the earliness period was highly positively correlated with the substrate cellulose (r2 = 0.6369), whereas there was a strong negative correlation between the earliness period and substrate lignin (r2 = −0.7499). Mohamed et al. [20] reported that 19–22 days lapsed to the visible pinhead formation of P. columbinus grown on different substrates consisting of FBR, whereas a much longer earliness period (45.67–140.25 days) was needed for P. columbinus cultivated on substrates consisting of rice straw supplemented with peels of prickly pear and rice husk [63].
Satisfactory B.E. values were detected in most of the tested substrates (Table 5). The B.E. values (59.3–87.1%) recorded for the substrates consisting of SMS and SCG or WS, regardless of the supplement addition, were equal to or higher than that of the control substrate (61.6%). Also, a high B.E. value was presented in the supplemented substrate of 60 SMS-20 FBR (69.6%), whereas the combination of SMS and FBR without supplements led to the lowest B.E. (23.4%). Contrarily, the 50 SMS-50 PS (without supplements) supported a higher B.E. (57.1%) than the supplemented 40 SMS-40 PS (28.5%). The results of this study reveal that P. columbinus can be successfully cultivated on SMS, alone or in combination with other agro-industrial residues and supplemented or not, which is a completely new finding. So, apart from substrate supplementation, there are other crucial physicochemical parameters which can impact the mushroom B.E., such as the availability of nutrients, the cellulose and lignin contents, the pH, the moisture content and the combination of all these factors on the cultivation substrate. It was observed that the B.E. values were very highly positively correlated with the Crem (r2 = 0.7092). In addition, the mixtures of SMS and agro-industrial residues (except for 70 SMS-30 FBR and 40 SMS-40 PS) positively influenced the B.E. values, as they were higher than that in the substrate consisting of only SMS (supplemented 80 SMS, 49.7% and non-supplemented 100 SMS, 34.6%).
Mandeel et al. [21] reported similar B.E. values for P. columbinus grown on plant fibers and sawdust (66.4–87.7%), while the values (100.8–134.5%) on chopped office papers and cardboard were higher than those of the present study. Also, a wide range of B.E. values was recorded (43.3–99.3%) when P. columbinus was cultivated on rice straw and corn straw supplemented with different ratios of compost [64]. On the contrary, substantially low B.E. values were recorded (9.3–14.2%) when P. columbinus was cultivated on different substrates consisting of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) straw [20]. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the cultivation of P. columbinus on substrates consisting of SMS has not yet been examined in other studies. Nevertheless, mixtures of SMS and agro-industrial residues (WS, barley and oat straw, coffee residue, the roots of leafy vegetables) have been tested as alternative substrates in other Pleurotus sp. (P. ostreatus, P. eryngii, P. citrinopileatus) cultivations and positively affected the B.E. values [12,41,42,65].

3.6. Intra-Cellullar Polysaccharide (ICP) Synthesis in Mushrooms

Intra-cellular polysaccharides (ICP) were measured in selected mushrooms, those produced on substrates with statistically higher B.E. values than that of the control substrate. As shown in Figure 5, all the substrates consisting of SMS had a positive impact on the ICP synthesis by P. columbinus. The highest amount was detected in mushrooms produced on SMS combined with WS, with (45.9%, w/w) or without supplements (42.5%, w/w). The positive effect of WS on the ICP content and generally in mushroom dietary compositions has also been detected in previous studies [39,41], indicating the reason why it is the major substrate of commercial Pleurotus sp. cultivation. Moreover, significant ICP contents were observed in mushrooms produced on SMS combined with SCGs (34.7–36.8%, w/w). Otherwise, the ICP synthesis did not show a statistically significant difference in the mushrooms cultivated on 60 SMS-20 FBR (31.8%, w/w) and the control substrate (29.6%, w/w). Economou et al. [53] reported slightly higher values of ICPs in P. ostreatus (42.02%, w/w) and P. pulmonarius (42.94%, w/w) mushrooms grown on SMSs. Similar ICP values to the present results were observed for P. ostreatus mushrooms (29–44%, w/w) cultivated on substrates of different SMSs and the combination of SMSs and fresh agro-residues, while they were higher for P. eryngii mushrooms (42–46%, w/w) in the same study [41]. Furthermore, comparable results to those of the present study have been reported for P. ostreatus mushrooms (32.03–44.92%, w/w) grown on different substrates with SMS and the roots of leafy vegetables, with or without supplements, whereas the highest ICP synthesis was detected in the 90% SMS (50.93%, w/w) [40].
The quantity of polysaccharides in mushrooms is an important parameter, connected with many health-beneficial properties. Glucans, the main constituent of mushrooms’ polysaccharides, especially have various biological functions [66,67]. So, the selection of the most suitable substrates for the subsequent large-scale experiments will be based on the B.E. values and ICP contents of P. columbinus mushrooms, as the final purpose of this study is the production of glucans and their possible incorporation into food supplements.

4. Conclusions

The results of the present study reveal the possible bioconversion of substrates consisting of different agro-industrial residues into useful compounds, such as biomass, laccase and carbohydrates, by P. columbinus. All the substrates supported P. columbinus growth and the Kr values were up to 7.6 mm/day. Higher biomass (424.0–803.7 mg/g d.w.) and carbohydrate (3.8–17.4 mg/g d.w.) synthesis by P. columbinus was detected in all the colonized substrates (except for the biomass synthesis on the supplemented substrates 60 SMS-20 FBR and 60 SMS-20 WS) compared with the control substrate (345.2 and 2.6 mg/g d.w., respectively). Moreover, substrates consisting of SMS or SMS with SCG and FBR favored laccase production (34,646.4–59,933.4 U/g d.w.), while those of PS promoted total cellulases synthesis (0.8 U/g d.w.). Regarding the Crem and Nrem in the fully colonized substrates, the former was decreased and the latter was increased in all the cases. Also, it is important to mention that although the substrates of only SMS, with (80 SMS) or without (100 SMS) supplements, had a positive influence on the biomass and laccase production the B.E. of P. columbinus on these substrates was low. Otherwise, higher or equal B.E values were recorded in substrates consisting of SMS with SCG or WS and 60 SMS-20 FBR (59.3–87.1%) than that of the control substrate (61.6%), so ICP were determined in the produced mushrooms of these substrates. Apart from the 60 SMS-20 FBR, the rest of the substrates promoted greater ICP synthesis (34.7–45.9%, w/w) by P. columbinus than that of the control substrate (29.6%, w/w). To conclude, this study widens our knowledge on the suitability of alternative substrates, with or without supplements, which have not been used in the cultivation of P. columbinus, a not-so-well-tested mushroom. Finally, further large-scale experiments should be conducted to investigate how the most prominent substrates, 60 SMS-20 SCG, 70 SMS-30 SCG, 60 SMS-20 WS and 70 SMS-30 WS, influence the quality of P. columbinus, as well as its nutritional and bioactive compounds, such as glucans.

Author Contributions

M.D.: formal analysis, methodology, data curation, writing—original draft and editing; S.P. and C.G.: writing—review, funding acquisition; P.D.: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) under the 4rth Call for HFRI PhD Fellowships (Fellowship Number: 11166).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Atallah, E.; Zeaiter, J.; Ahmad, M.N.; Leahy, J.J.; Kwapinski, W. Hydrothermal carbonization of spent mushroom compost waste compared against torrefaction and pyrolysis. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 216, 106795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barzee, T.J.; Cao, L.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, R. Fungi for Future foods. J. Future Foods 2021, 1, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maftoun, P.; Johari, H.; Soltani, M.; Malik, R.; Othman, N.Z.; El Enshasy, H.A. The edible mushroom Pleurotus spp.: I. Biodiversity and nutritional values. Int. J. Biotechnol. Wellness Ind. 2015, 4, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Z.; Bao, X.; Xia, R.; Hou, Z.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Pan, S.; Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Huang, Z. Effect of mushroom root fermentation broth on the umami taste and nutrients Flammulina velutipes. J. Future Foods 2023, 3, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zisopoulos, F.K.; Ramírez, H.A.B.; van der Goot, A.J.; Boom, R.M. A resource efficiency assessment of the industrial mushroom production chain: The influence of data variability. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 126, 394–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, Z.; Zhang, R.; Zicari, S. Integrated Processing Technologies for Food and Agricultural by-Products; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 413–438. [Google Scholar]
  7. Reis, N.; Botelho, B.G.; Franca, A.S.; Oliveira, L.S. Simultaneous detection of multiple adulterants in ground roasted coffee by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and data fusion. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 2700–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mefleh, M.; Pasqualone, A.; Caponio, F.; Faccia, M. Legumes as basic ingredients in the production of dairy-free cheese alternatives: A Review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brijbhooshan, B.; Singh, V.K.; Shalini, S. Response of field pea (Pisum sativum L. var arvense) to various planting methods, irrigation schedule and weed management practices. Legume Res. 2017, 40, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nikolopoulou, D.; Grigorakis, K.; Stasini, M.; Alexis, M.N.; Iliadis, K. Differences in chemical composition of field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars: Effects of cultivation area and year. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bartzas, G.; Komnitsas, K. Life cycle analysis of pistachio production in Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 595, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Diamantis, I.; Dedousi, M.; Melanouri, E.-M.; Dalaka, E.; Antonopoulou, P.; Adelfopoulou, A.; Papanikolaou, S.; Politis, I.; Theodorou, G.; Diamantopoulou, P. Impact of spent mushroom substrate combined with hydroponic leafy vegetable roots on Pleurotus citrinopileatus productivity and fruit bodies biological properties. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Economou, C.N.; Diamantopoulou, P.A.; Philippoussis, A.N. Valorization of spent oyster mushroom substrate and laccase recovery through successive solid state cultivation of Pleurotus, Ganoderma, and Lentinula strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 5213–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hoa, H.T.; Wang, C.-L.; Wang, C.-H. The Effects of different substrates on the growth, yield, and nutritional composition of two oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus cystidiosus). Mycobiology 2015, 43, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barbieri, G.S.; Bento, H.B.; de Oliveira, F.; Picheli, F.P.; Dias, L.M.; Masarin, F.; Santos-Ebinuma, V.C. Xylanase production by Talaromyces amestolkiae valuing agroindustrial byproducts. BioTech 2022, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhary, P.; More, N.; Yadav, A.; Bharagava, R.N. Ligninolytic enzymes: An introduction and applications in the food industry. In Enzymes in Food Biotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lavelli, V.; Proserpio, C.; Gallotti, F.; Laureati, M.; Pagliarini, E. Circular reuse of bio-resources: The role of Pleurotus spp. in the development of functional foods. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 1353–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elkhateeb, W.A.; EL-Ghwas, D.E.; Daba, G.M. Mushrooms as efficient enzymatic machinery. J. Biomed. Res. Environ. Sci. 2022, 3, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hamed, I.; Özogul, F.; Regenstein, J.M. Industrial applications of crustacean by-products (chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides): A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 48, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mohamed, M.F.; Nassef, D.M.; Kotb, A.M.A.M.; Waly, E.A. Earliness, biological efficiency and basidiocarp yield of Pleurotus ostreatus and P. columbinus oyster mushrooms in response to different sole and mixed substrates. Assiut J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 43, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mandeel, Q.A.; Al-Laith, A.A.; Mohamed, S.A. Cultivation of οyster mushrooms (Pleurotus spp.) on various lignocellulosic wastes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Elhusseiny, S.M.; El-Mahdy, T.S.; Awad, M.F.; Elleboudy, N.S.; Farag, M.M.; Aboshanab, K.M.; Yassien, M.A. Antiviral, cytotoxic, and antioxidant activities of three edible agaricomycetes mushrooms: Pleurotus columbinus, Pleurotus sajor-caju and Agaricus bisporus. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Irshad, A.; Tahir, A.; Sharif, S.; Khalid, A.; Ali, S.; Naz, A.; Sadia, H.; Ameen, A. Determination of nutritional and biochemical composition of selected Pleurotus spps. BioMed Res. Int. 2023, 2023, 8150909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Amira, A.; El-Diasty, G.G. Evaluation of some white–rot fungi from Egypt for their ability to produce ligninolytic enzymes and decolorization of poly R-478. Bull. Fac. Sci. Elmenia Univ. 2006, 17, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  25. Angelini, P.; Pellegrino, R.M.; Tirillini, B.; Flores, G.A.; Alabed, H.B.; Ianni, F.; Blasi, F.; Cossignani, L.; Venanzoni, R.; Orlando, G. Metabolomic profiling and biological activities of Pleurotus columbinus Quél. cultivated on different agri-food byproducts. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Philippoussis, A.; Zervakis, G.; Diamantopoulou, P. Bioconversion of agricultural lignocellulosic wastes through the cultivation of the edible mushrooms Agrocybe aegerita, Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus spp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sparks, D.L.; Fendorf, S.E.; Toner, C.V.; Carski, T.H. Kinetic methods and measurements. In SSSA Book Series; Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T., Sumner, M.E., Eds.; Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 1275–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environmental Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environmental Federation: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  29. Crocker, L.M.; DePeters, E.J.; Fadel, J.G.; Essex, S.E.; Perez-Monti, H.; Taylor, S.J. Ash content of detergent fibers in feeds, digesta and feces and its relevance in fiber digestibility calculations. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 1010–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goering, H.K. Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications); US Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1970.
  31. Van Soest, P.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Švagelj, M.; Berovič, M.; Boh, B.; Menard, A.; Simčič, S.; Wraber, B. Solid-state cultivation of Grifola frondosa [Dicks: Fr] SF Gray biomass and immunostimulatory effects of fungal intra-and extracellular β-Polysaccharides. New Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Diamantopoulou, P.; Papanikolaou, S.; Komaitis, M.; Aggelis, G.; Philippoussis, A. Patterns of major metabolites biosynthesis by different mushroom fungi grown on glucose-based submerged cultures. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 1385–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ghose, T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Miller, G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liang, Y.; Sarkany, N.; Cui, Y.; Blackburn, J.W. Batch stage study of lipid production from crude glycerol derived from yellow grease or animal fats through microalgal fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6745–6750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Atila, F. Evaluation of suitability of various agro-wastes for productivity of Pleurotus djamor, Pleurotus citrinopileatus and Pleurotus eryngii mushrooms. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2017, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abou Fayssal, S.; El Sebaaly, Z.; Alsanad, M.A.; Najjar, R.; Böhme, M.; Yordanova, M.H.; Sassine, Y.N. Combined effect of olive pruning residues and spent coffee grounds on Pleurotus ostreatus production, composition and nutritional value. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Melanouri, E.-M.; Diamantis, I.; Dedousi, M.; Dalaka, E.; Antonopoulou, P.; Papanikolaou, S.; Politis, I.; Theodorou, G.; Diamantopoulou, P. Pleurotus ostreatus: Nutritional enhancement and antioxidant activity improvement through cultivation on spent mushroom substrate and roots of leafy vegetables. Fermentation 2025, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dedousi, M.; Melanouri, E.-M.; Karayannis, D.; Kaminarides, E.-I.; Diamantopoulou, P. Utilization of spent substrates and waste products of mushroom cultivation to produce new crops of Pleurotus ostreatus, Pleurotus eryngii and Agaricus bisporus. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2024, 7, 100196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, S.; Xu, F.; Li, Z.; Zhao, S.; Song, S.; Rong, C.; Geng, X.; Liu, Y. The spent mushroom substrates of Hypsizigus marmoreus can be an effective component for growing the oyster mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 186, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alsanad, M.; Sassine, Y.N.; El Sebaaly, Z.; Abou Fayssal, S. Spent coffee grounds influence on Pleurotus ostreatus production, composition, fatty acid profile, and lignocellulose biodegradation capacity. CyTA J. Food 2021, 19, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Diamantis, I.; Papanikolaou, S.; Michou, S.; Anastasopoulos, V.; Diamantopoulou, P. Yeast lipids from crude glycerol media and utilization of lipid fermentation wastewater as maceration water in cultures of edible and medicinal mushrooms. Processes 2023, 11, 3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zervakis, G.; Philippoussis, A.; Ioannidou, S.; Diamantopoulou, P. Mycelium growth kinetics and optimal temperature conditions for the cultivation of edible mushroom species on lignocellulosic substrates. Folia Microbiol. 2001, 46, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Atila, F. Compositional changes in lignocellulosic content of some agro-wastes during the production cycle of Shiitake mushroom. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 245, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eliopoulos, C.; Markou, G.; Kremmyda, A.; Haroutounian, S.A.; Arapoglou, D. Enrichment of pistachio shell with olive mill waste or Lathyrus clymenum pericarp mixtures via solid state fermentation with Pleurotus ostreatus. Fermentation 2022, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Parani, K.; Eyini, M. Biodegradation of coffee pulp waste by different fungal associations. Biosci. Discov. 2012, 3, 222–228. [Google Scholar]
  49. Akinfemi, A.; Adu, O.A.; Doherty, F. Conversion of sorghum stover into animal feed with white-rot fungi: Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus pulmonarius. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Philippoussis, A.; Diamantopoulou, P.; Papadopoulou, K.; Lakhtar, H.; Roussos, S.; Parissopoulos, G.; Papanikolaou, S. Biomass, laccase and endoglucanase production by Lentinula edodes during solid state fermentation of reed grass, bean stalks and wheat straw residues. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dedousi, M.; Melanouri, E.-M.; Diamantopoulou, P. Carposome productivity of Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus eryngii growing on agro-industrial residues enriched with nitrogen, calcium salts and oils. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2023, 6, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kachlishvili, E.; Penninckx, M.J.; Tsiklauri, N.; Elisashvili, V. Effect of nitrogen source on lignocellulolytic enzyme production by white-rot basidiomycetes under solid-state cultivation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Economou, C.N.; Philippoussis, A.N.; Diamantopoulou, P.A. Spent mushroom substrate for a second cultivation cycle of Pleurotus mushrooms and dephenolization of agro-industrial wastewaters. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2020, 367, fnaa060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Khalil, M.I.; Hoque, M.; Basunia, M.A.; Alam, N.; Khan, M.A. Production of cellulase by Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus sajor-caju in solid state fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2011, 35, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elisashvili, V.; Kachlishvili, E.; Penninckx, M. Effect of growth substrate, method of fermentation and nitrogen source on lignocellulose-degrading enzymes production by white-rot basidiomycetes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 1531–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pandit, N.P.; Maheshwari, S.K. Optimization of cellulase enzyme production from sugarcane pressmud using oyster mushroom-Pleurotus sajor-caju by solid state fermentation. J. Bioremediation Biodegrad. 2012, 3, 1000140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zamora Zamora, H.D.; Silva, T.A.; Varao, L.H.; Baffi, M.A.; Pasquini, D. Simultaneous production of cellulases, hemicellulases and reducing sugars by Pleurotus ostreatus growth in one-pot solid state fermentation using Alstroemeria Sp. waste. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 13, 4879–4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Melanouri, E.-M.; Papanikolaou, S.; Diamantopoulou, P. Mortierella ramanniana lipid fermentation wastewater as an innovative maceration liquid medium for sustainable solid-state cultivation of higher fungi. Waste Biomass Valorization 2024, 15, 6903–6925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Smiderle, F.R.; Olsen, L.M.; Ruthes, A.C.; Czelusniak, P.A.; Santana-Filho, A.P.; Sassaki, G.L.; Gorin, P.A.J.; Iacomini, M. Exopolysaccharides, proteins and lipids in Pleurotus pulmonarius submerged culture using different carbon sources. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ozturk Urek, R.; Ilgin, S. Production and partial characterization of the exopolysaccharide from Pleurotus sajor caju. Ann. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Silveira, M.L.; Smiderle, F.R.; Agostini, F.; Pereira, E.M.; Bonatti-Chaves, M.; Wisbeck, E.; Ruthes, A.C.; Sassaki, G.L.; Cipriani, T.R.; Furlan, S.A. Exopolysaccharide produced by Pleurotus sajor-caju: Its chemical structure and anti-inflammatory activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 75, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhu, H.; Sheng, K.; Yan, E.; Qiao, J.; Lv, F. Extraction, purification and antibacterial activities of a polysaccharide from spent mushroom substrate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 50, 840–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. EL-Sayed, S.S.; Anwar, D.A.; Hassan, H.A. Comparison between peels of prickly pear and rice husk as additives to rice straw substrate for oyster mushroom (Pleurotus columbinus) production. Sci. J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 5, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mohamed, M.F.; Refaei, E.F.S.; Abdalla, M.M.A.; Abdelgalil, S.H. Fruiting bodies yield of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus columbinus) as affected by different portions of compost in the substrate. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2016, 5, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lisiecka, J.; Prasad, R.; Jasinska, A. The Utilisation of Pholiota nameko, Hypsizygus marmoreus, and Hericium erinaceus spent mushroom substrates in Pleurotus ostreatus cultivation. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lesa, K.N.; Khandaker, M.U.; Mohammad Rashed Iqbal, F.; Sharma, R.; Islam, F.; Mitra, S.; Emran, T.B. Nutritional value, medicinal importance, and health-promoting effects of dietary mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 2454180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pilafidis, S.; Tsouko, E.; Sougleri, G.; Diamantopoulou, P.; Gkatzionis, K.; Ioannou, Z.; Sarris, D. Submerged cultivation of selected macro-fungi to produce mycelia rich in β-glucans and other bioactive compounds, valorizing side streams of the food industry. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2024, 7, 100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Growth rates (Kr) (mm/d) of P. columbinus during solid-state fermentation in glass Petri dishes on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PS) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Figure 1. Growth rates (Kr) (mm/d) of P. columbinus during solid-state fermentation in glass Petri dishes on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PS) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Biotech 14 00034 g001
Figure 2. Laccase production (U/g substrate, d.w.) by P. columbinus in polypropylene bags on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PS) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Figure 2. Laccase production (U/g substrate, d.w.) by P. columbinus in polypropylene bags on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PS) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Biotech 14 00034 g002
Figure 3. Total cellulases production (U/g substrate, d.w.) by P. columbinus in polypropylene bags on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PS) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Figure 3. Total cellulases production (U/g substrate, d.w.) by P. columbinus in polypropylene bags on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PS) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Biotech 14 00034 g003
Figure 4. Carbohydrate production (mg/g substrate, d.w.) by P. columbinus in polypropylene bags on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCGs), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PSs) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, < 0.05) among different substrates.
Figure 4. Carbohydrate production (mg/g substrate, d.w.) by P. columbinus in polypropylene bags on substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCGs), faba bean residues (FBR), pistachio shells (PSs) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, < 0.05) among different substrates.
Biotech 14 00034 g004
Figure 5. Intra-cellular polysaccharide (ICP) (%, w/w) synthesis by P. columbinus in mushrooms produced during solid-state fermentation in polypropylene bags on selected substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Figure 5. Intra-cellular polysaccharide (ICP) (%, w/w) synthesis by P. columbinus in mushrooms produced during solid-state fermentation in polypropylene bags on selected substrates consisting of spent mushroom substrate (SMS), spent coffee grounds (SCG), faba bean residues (FBR) and wheat straw (WS), supplemented (S) or non-supplemented (NS). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means. Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among different substrates.
Biotech 14 00034 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw agro-industrial residues and supplements. Values (% d.w.) are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw agro-industrial residues and supplements. Values (% d.w.) are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Parameters (%)SMS *SCGFBRPSWSWBSF
C29.0 ± 0.1 e **32.9 ± 0.0 a29.7 ± 0.6 d31.1 ± 0.4 c31.5 ± 0.2 bc31.7 ± 0.2 b31.3 ± 0.1 bc
N0.8 ± 0.0 d1.2 ± 0.1 c0.6 ± 0.0 e0.5 ± 0.0 e0.5 ± 0.0 e1.9 ± 0.1 b6.6 ± 0.1 a
Protein5.0 ± 0.2 d7.5 ± 0.4 c3.6 ± 0.2 e3.3 ± 0.2 e3.0 ± 0.0 e11.6 ± 0.4 b41.0 ± 0.6 a
Cellulose37.1 ± 1.0 b22.6 ± 0.2 d38.1 ± 0.0 b33.3 ± 0.7 c41.2 ± 1.9 a10.4 ± 0.0 f13.9 ± 0.1 e
Lignin7.0 ± 0.3 c12.0 ± 0.2 b7.0 ± 0.2 c14.8 ± 0.5 a5.7 ± 0.0 d3.0 ± 0.1 e7.6 ± 0.2 c
* SMS: spent mushroom substrate; SCG: spent coffee grounds; FBR: faba bean residues; PS: pistachio shells; WS: wheat straw; WB: wheat bran; SF: soybean flour. ** Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) for comparisons of treatment means among different substrates.
Table 2. Chemical composition of final supplemented substrates (before inoculation) utilized for solid-state fermentation. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Table 2. Chemical composition of final supplemented substrates (before inoculation) utilized for solid-state fermentation. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Supplemented Substrates C
(% d.w.)
N
(% d.w.)
C/NCellulose
(%, w/w)
Lignin
(%, w/w)
40 SMS-40 SCG *30.5 ± 0.9 b **1.3 ± 0.1 a22.7 ± 0.5 e26.5 ± 0.4 e9.9 ± 0.6 ab
60 SMS-20 SCG30.2 ± 0.2 bcde1.3 ± 0.0 ab23.8 ± 0.9 de29.6 ± 0.4 d8.9 ± 0.6 bc
40 SMS-40 FBR29.7 ± 0.1 cde1.1 ± 0.0 bc26.2 ± 1.0 cd32.3 ± 1.3 bc7.8 ± 0.7 cd
60 SMS-20 FBR29.6 ± 0.1 de1.2 ± 0.1 bc25.5 ± 1.2 d32.5 ± 1.3 bc7.9 ± 0.7 cd
40 SMS-40 PS30.3 ± 0.1 bcd1.1 ± 0.0 cd28.2 ± 1.1 bc30.8 ± 0.9 cd11.0 ± 0.9 a
60 SMS-20 PS29.9 ± 0.1 bcde1.0 ± 0.0 cd29.0 ± 1.2 bc31.7 ± 0.9 bcd9.4 ± 0.9 b
80 SMS29.5 ± 0.1 e1.0 ± 1.0 cd28.3 ± 1.5 bc32.7 ± 0.2 abc6.8 ± 0.6 de
40 SMS-40 WS30.4 ± 0.2 bc1.1 ± 0.1 cd28.8 ± 1.7 bc33.9 ± 2.1 ab7.3 ± 0.5 d
60 SMS-20 WS29.9 ± 0.2 bcde1.0 ± 0.0 cd29.2 ± 0.9 b33.3 ± 2.1 abc7.6 ± 0.5 cd
80 WS 31.4 ± 0.1 a0.9 ± 0.0 d34.0 ± 1.2 a35.2 ± 2.1 a5.7 ± 0.6 e
* SMS: spent mushroom substrate; SCG: spent coffee grounds; FBR: faba bean residues; PS: pistachio shells; WS: wheat straw. ** Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) for comparisons of treatment means among different supplemented substrates.
Table 3. Chemical composition of final non-supplemented substrates (before inoculation) utilized for solid-state fermentation. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Table 3. Chemical composition of final non-supplemented substrates (before inoculation) utilized for solid-state fermentation. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Non-Supplemented SubstratesC
(% d.w.)
N
(% d.w.)
C/NCellulose
(%, w/w)
Lignin
(%, w/w)
50 SMS-50 SCG *30.4 ± 0.8 b **1.0 ± 0.1 a32.0 ± 1.5 e30.3 ± 0.2 e9.5 ± 0.4 b
70 SMS-30 SCG30.1 ± 0.1 bc0.9 ± 0.0 b34.5 ± 1.6 e33.4 ± 0.2 e8.5 ± 0.4 c
50 SMS-50 FBR29.2 ± 0.2 de0.7 ± 0.0 c41.1 ± 0.7 d37.6 ± 1.1 bcd7.0 ± 0.5 d
70 SMS-30 FBR29.1 ± 0.2 de0.7 ± 0.0 c43.8 ± 1.1 d37.8 ± 1.1 bcd7.0 ± 0.5 d
50 SMS-50 PS30.0 ± 0.1 bc0.6 ± 0.0 d52.2 ± 1 bc35.7 ± 0.7 d10.9 ± 0.7 a
70 SMS-30 PS29.5 ± 0.2 cde0.6 ± 0.0 d49.0 ± 2.2 c36.6 ± 0.7 cd9.4 ± 0.7 b
100 SMS28.9 ± 0.2 e0.6 ± 0.0 d48.8 ± 2.4 c38.1 ± 0.0 bc7.0 ± 0.2 d
50 SMS-50 WS30.2 ± 0.1 bc0.6 ± 0.0 de54.8 ± 2.8 b39.6 ± 1.9 ab6.4 ± 0.2 de
70 SMS-30 WS29.7 ± 0.1 bcd0.6 ± 0.0 d51.4 ± 1.7 bc39.0 ± 1.9 b6.6 ± 0.2 d
* SMS: spent mushroom substrate; SCG: spent coffee grounds; FBR: faba bean residues; PS: pistachio shells; WS: wheat straw. ** Lack of letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) for comparisons of treatment means among different non-supplemented substrates.
Table 4. P. columbinus production parameters at the end of colonization in polypropylene bags on final mixtures, supplemented or non-supplemented. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Table 4. P. columbinus production parameters at the end of colonization in polypropylene bags on final mixtures, supplemented or non-supplemented. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
SubstratesIncubation
Period (Days)
Biomass (mg/g d.w.)Crem (%, w/w)Nrem (%, w/w)
Supplemented60 SMS-20 SCG *12 ± 0f **C ***700.0 ± 17.2cB29.6 ± 0.9aA1.7 ± 0.1abAB
60 SMS-20 FBR13 ± 1deB279.2 ± 12.8hD29.1 ± 0.4bB1.6 ± 0.1bcB
40 SMS-40 PS10 ± 0gD558.2 ± 17.2dC28.8 ± 0.5cC1.7 ± 0.0aA
80 SMS14 ± 0cA746.0 ± 21.0bA27.4 ± 0.2eD1.4 ± 0.0deC
60 SMS-20 WS13 ± 0dB313.9 ± 12.8ghD29.0 ± 0.0bcBC1.3 ± 0.0efC
Non-supplemented70 SMS-30 SCG12 ± 1efC803.7 ± 22.9aA29.1 ± 0.1bB1.5 ± 0.1cdA
70 SMS-30 FBR16 ± 0aA494.7 ± 12.2eC27.5 ± 0.2deC1.3 ± 0.1efB
50 SMS-50 PS9 ± 0hD554.9 ± 17.2dB29.6 ± 1.6aA1.0 ± 0.1gC
100 SMS16 ± 1aA756.0 ± 24.8bA27.7 ± 0.2dC0.8 ± 0.0fD
70 SMS-30 WS15 ± 0bB424.0 ± 19.9fD28.9 ± 0.7bcB0.8 ± 0.1hD
80 WS (control)16 ± 0a 345.2 ± 14.7g 29.5 ± 0.3a 1.3 ± 0.0h
* SMS: spent mushroom substrate; SCG: spent coffee grounds; FBR: faba bean residues; PS: pistachio shells; WS: wheat straw. ** Lack of lowercase letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among all substrates. *** Lack of capital letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among supplemented or non-supplemented substrates.
Table 5. Earliness period (days) and biological efficiency (B.E.) (%) of P. columbinus on supplemented or non-supplemented substrates in polypropylene bags. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Table 5. Earliness period (days) and biological efficiency (B.E.) (%) of P. columbinus on supplemented or non-supplemented substrates in polypropylene bags. Values are expressed as means ± standard errors of means.
Substrates Earliness (Days)B.E. (%)
Supplemented60 SMS-20 SCG *19 ± 0f **C ***87.1 ± 1.5aA
60 SMS-20 FBR21 ± 1deB69.6 ± 2.1bB
40 SMS-40 PS19 ± 1fC28.5 ± 0.7hE
80 SMS20 ± 0efBC49.7 ± 1.9fD
60 SMS-20 WS24 ± 1cA59.3 ± 2.3deC
Non-supplemented70 SMS-30 SCG20 ± 1fC63.4 ± 1.2cA
70 SMS-30 FBR27 ± 1aA23.4 ± 0.6iD
50 SMS-50 PS19 ± 1fC57.1 ± 1.6eB
100 SMS22 ± 1cdB34.6 ± 0.6gC
70 SMS-30 WS25 ± 1bA63.9 ± 1.7cA
80 WS27 ± 1ab 61.6 ± 2.4cd
* SMS: spent mushroom substrate; SCG: spent coffee grounds; FBR: faba bean residues; PS: pistachio shells; WS: wheat straw. ** Lack of lowercase letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among all substrates. *** Lack of capital letters in common indicates statistically significant differences (Duncan’s t-test, <0.05) among supplemented or non-supplemented substrates.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dedousi, M.; Gardeli, C.; Papanikolaou, S.; Diamantopoulou, P. Combined Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Agro-Industrial Residues on Pleurotus columbinus Production and Intra-Cellular Polysaccharide Synthesis. BioTech 2025, 14, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech14020034

AMA Style

Dedousi M, Gardeli C, Papanikolaou S, Diamantopoulou P. Combined Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Agro-Industrial Residues on Pleurotus columbinus Production and Intra-Cellular Polysaccharide Synthesis. BioTech. 2025; 14(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech14020034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dedousi, Marianna, Chrysavgi Gardeli, Seraphim Papanikolaou, and Panagiota Diamantopoulou. 2025. "Combined Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Agro-Industrial Residues on Pleurotus columbinus Production and Intra-Cellular Polysaccharide Synthesis" BioTech 14, no. 2: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech14020034

APA Style

Dedousi, M., Gardeli, C., Papanikolaou, S., & Diamantopoulou, P. (2025). Combined Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Agro-Industrial Residues on Pleurotus columbinus Production and Intra-Cellular Polysaccharide Synthesis. BioTech, 14(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech14020034

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop