A Case of Unilateral Hyperpigmentation

Abstract

Phytophotodermatitis is a cutaneous phototoxic reaction resulting from contact with plant compounds such as furocoumarin in citrus fruits, followed by exposure to ultraviolet light. Erythema and vesicles appear on the contact area, followed by hyperpigmented lesions. Hyperpigmentation may exist for weeks to months before fading but can remain up to several years. Diagnosis is often challenging due to the variety of clinical presentations, and it is not always easy to identify trigger exposures. A detailed history is key to diagnosis. We herein report a case of lime-induced phytophotodermatitis which was initially mistaken for unilateral lentiginosis. The patient underwent Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment with immediate improvement.

1. Introduction

Phytophotodermatitis is a non-immunologic cutaneous reaction caused by exposure to photosensitizing compounds in plants and subsequent exposure to sunlight [1]. Furocoumarin is a photosensitizing substance produced by certain plants including lime, celery, fig and parsnip [2]. Clinical findings evolve from the initial painful erythema and edema to blisters and late hyperpigmentation. Diagnosis is challenging and is often misdiagnosed as other skin conditions including allergic contact dermatitis and burns (early) and pigmentary disorders (late), especially when a patient fails to mention the relevant background. Treatment is symptomatic, the rash being resolved in weeks, though hyperpigmentation can persist for months. Herein, we present a case of lime-induced phytophotodermatitis which was initially mistaken for unilateral lentiginosis and showed drastic improvement after a single session of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and intense pulsed light treatment.

2. Case

A 26-year-old woman presented with asymptomatic, diffuse, brown macules and patches on the right hand and arms for weeks (Figure 1). The patient did not have any past medical or dermatologic problems. On histopathologic examination, mild elongation of the rete ridges and increased pigmentation of the basal keratinocytes with few scattered dermal melanophages were shown (Figure 2). Based on the brief clinical exam and pathology, the patient was presumed to have unilateral lentiginosis and underwent a single session of intense pulsed light (IPL) and Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser treatment. The patient was advised to use sunscreen to minimize laser-related post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH).

After two months, the hyperpigmented lesions showed significant improvement, which was surprising considering the nature of lentigines which normally require multiple treatment (Figure 3). On further history taking, the patient was said to have made a trip to Vietnam where she squeezed and touched lime exclusively with her right hand. The patient revealed that the area first showed erythema and a few vesicles which later-on turned into pigmented spots. From the history and prompt response to treatment we made a final diagnosis of lime-induced phytophotodermatitis, which was initially overlooked.

3. Discussion

Phytophotodermatitis is a phototoxic reaction that occurs after exposure to plant-derived photosensitizing compounds followed by ultraviolet A (UVA 320–380 nm) radiation [1]. Various plants including citrus fruit, celery, wild parsnip, carrot, and fig contain phototoxic agents that precipitate phototoxic reactions [2]. Furocoumarin is such a compound and normally protects plants against the attack of fungal pathogens [3]. When furocoumarin is ingested or applied to the skin with the skin being further exposed to UVA, cellular damage is triggered, either directly through a photosensitizer-target interaction or indirectly through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4].

After the first description of phytophotodermatitis in 1942 by Klaber [5], there have been a number of case reports on lime-induced phyophotodermatitis (

Table 1. Review of lime-induced phytophotodermatitis in the literature.

No.	Publication	Age (yr)/Sex	Cutaneous Findings	Location	Contact History
1	Coffman et al. [11] 1985	4/F	Hyperpigmentation	Chest, upper back, and wrist	Squeezing lime
2	Coffman et al. [11] 1985	1/M	Hyperpigmentation	Chest and back	Squeezing lime
3	Wagner et al. [12] 2002	6/M	Erythema and bullae	Hand	Squeezing lime
4	Pomeranz et al. [1] 2007	23/F	Erythema and bullae	Back, arm, and hand	Preparing mojitos
3	Hankinson et al. [13] 2014	24/F	Erythema and bullae	Hand	Squeezing lime while cooking
4	Mioduszewski and Beecker [14] 2015	26/F	Erythema and bullae	Hand	Squeezing lime while making sangria
5	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	23/F	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
6	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	25/F	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
7	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	31/F	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
8	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	19/F	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
9	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	41/M	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
10	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	40/M	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
11	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	21/F	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
12	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	14/F	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
13	Galvañ-Pérez et al. [15] 2016	16/F	Hyperpigmentation	Hand	Preparing mojitos
14	Snaidr and Lowe [16] 2017	36/F	Erythema and bullae	Hand	Lime juice
15	Safran et al. [17] 2017	17/F	Erythema and bullae	Hand	Squeezing lime while cooking
16	Fitzpatrick et al. [18] 2018	31/M	Hyperpigmented macules	Hand	Squeezing lime while mixing margaritas
17	Abugroun A et al. [2] 2019	26/M	Erythema and bullae	Hand	Squeezing lime
18	Wang and Ma [19] 2021	6/F	Hyperpigmented macules	Shoulder	Squeezing lime during the hot spring
19	Wang and Ma [19] 2021	-/M (No.18′s father)	Hyperpigmented macules	Upper back	Squeezing lime during the hot spring
20	Hamid et al. [20] 2021	25/M	Hyperpigmented macules	Hand	Drinking beer with lime

). The epidemiology is not well known, but most cases have been reported in cultures that widely consume limes (i.e., Mojito).

Phytophotodermatitis usually begin as erythema with subsequent blistering of the contact area, 12–36 h after furocoumarin exposure to UVA. Due to melanocyte hypertrophy, increased melanosome density and melanocyte dendricity, and dermal melanophages, hyperpigmented lesions may appear [6].

A detailed patient history is important in making a diagnosis, but patients sometimes do not disclose information because they think it is not relevant. Thus, it is important for the clinician to be aware of phytophotodermatitis because it is often misdiagnosed as allergic contact dermatitis, cellulitis, herpes simplex virus infection and even child abuse (early) and pigmentary disorders (late) [7].

There is limited evidence on the efficacy of treatment. Treatment is largely symptomatic, where a cold compress and topical steroids are sufficient for mild symptoms, whereas systemic steroids are indicated in severe cases. Hyperpigmentation may exist for weeks to months before fading but can persist up to several years if not properly managed [8].

Treatment options for the hyperpigmentation in phytophotodermatitis are similar to that of PIH from other causes. Topical agents such as hydroquinone and retinoids can be applied. Lasers that target melanin such as Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, as well as IPL, can be used successfully in persistent cases [9,10]. Although not routinely recommended, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser can be an option for those who want to improve their hyperpigmentation in a short period of time. In our case, the lesions disappeared shortly after a single session of Q-switched Nd:YAG and IPL.

If contact to the plants was recognized, the skin should be washed with water before exposure to sunlight. Additionally, as a preventive measure, we recommend vigorous photoprotection (i.e., sunscreen, physical sunshields) after having contact with plants containing furocoumarin. The importance of sunscreen is also emphasized after laser treatment to minimize the risk of PIH.