Previous Article in Journal
Unpacking Key Dimensions of Family Empowerment Among Latinx Parents of Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Using Exploratory Graph Analysis: Preliminary Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bullying Experiences Among Lithuanian Adolescents: The Associations Between Subjective Happiness and Well-Being

by
Margarita Kubilevičiūtė Sakalauskienė
,
Rokas Šambaras
* and
Sigita Lesinskienė
Clinic of Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Psychiatry Int. 2025, 6(3), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030097 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 April 2025 / Revised: 5 July 2025 / Accepted: 28 July 2025 / Published: 6 August 2025

Abstract

Background: Bullying is a significant problem worldwide and in Lithuania, especially among children and adolescents. This study aimed to assess the associations of bullying with adolescents’ subjective sense of happiness and general health. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous written questionnaire. Adolescents at various schools across Lithuanian cities and districts were surveyed to investigate the frequency of bullying among them over the past six months and its impact on their subjective sense of happiness and well-being. Results: This study included 4124 students from seventh to tenth grade; their average age was 14.48 ± 1.15 years, with 49.35% being boys. Over the past six months, the highest bullying incidence occurred at school, accounting for 25.79% of the cases. Only half of the respondents (48.81%) felt happy, and a little more than half felt healthy (63.11%). It was found that bullying at school (ρs = −0.224; ρs = −0.197), outside school (ρs = −0.207; ρs = −0.180), and online (ρs = −0.175; ρs = −0.110) is associated with adolescents’ sense of happiness and health. Conclusion: Bullying is common among Lithuanian adolescents and has a negative impact on their subjective happiness and well-being. It is crucial to develop prevention initiatives to decrease bullying in schools and within the community.

1. Introduction

Bullying is a very relevant problem in Lithuania and worldwide. It is defined as intentional and repeated aggressive behavior against an individual who cannot defend themselves [1]. It is often used to gain higher status, dominate a group, or reduce stress. Children can be involved in bullying in different roles, namely as the victim, bully, or bystander [2]. Bullying comes in many forms and can be expressed in different ways. For example, it can be indirect, characterized by social exclusion and rumor-spreading, or direct, including verbal and physical actions such as name-calling or hitting. Cyberbullying is currently very common; its frequency among Lithuanian adolescents has increased in recent years, and the numbers of both bullies and victims have increased [3]. Cyberbullying can be carried out by any electronic means, such as the Internet, and usually begins a little later than traditional bullying, from the age of 14, when adolescents begin to spend more time on the Internet and mobile phones [4,5].
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), adolescence is defined as a period between childhood and adulthood and includes individuals between the ages of 10 and 19 years old [6]. It is a critical development period during which adolescents experience various hormonal, emotional, and environmental changes, as well as rapid physical maturation and psychosocial development [7]. Adolescence is a critical stage of a person’s development, during which they begin to explore their identity more and become less dependent on their parents [8]. Although bullying is widespread and experienced in all age groups, adolescents experience the most. According to 2018 data from the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), more than one third of 13- to 15-year-old students have experienced bullying [9]. In Lithuania, about one quarter of adolescents are experiencing traditional bullying and cyberbullying [3]. Factors such as age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or appearance can cause childhood bullying. Experiencing frequent bullying in adolescence doubles the risk of developing depression in adulthood [10]. It has also been observed that bullying experienced during adolescence can have a negative impact on a person’s physical, psychological, and social functioning, which can lead to anxiety, suicidal thoughts, or fewer academic achievements [9].
Bullying in adolescence is a significant public health problem, given that it has a significant negative impact on adolescents’ mental health, mood disorders, and somatic symptoms [9], which can continue into adulthood and affect their relationships or physical health [11]. Mental health is also integral to health and well-being [12], as it can significantly impact a person’s physical health. The links between general health and mental health have been proven, as people with depression are at higher risk of developing chronic diseases. Conversely, people with chronic diseases are at higher risk of developing mental disorders [13]. Adolescents’ mental health is also an increasing problem. For example, in the United States of America, the proportion of high school students who feel sadness or hopelessness increased from 26% to 37% in a period of 10 years [14]. Although bullying has been studied for a long time, its prevalence among Lithuanian students remains one of the highest in Europe [15]. This is why studying the impact of bullying on Lithuanian adolescents is still relevant today. This study aimed to assess the relationship between experiences of bullying and both subjective happiness and general health among Lithuanian adolescents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Procedure

An anonymous survey was conducted from September to December 2023, collecting data from schools in various cities and districts of Lithuania. The study included students from the 7th to 10th grades. The questionnaire was prepared by the team of the Psychiatry Clinic of the Faculty of Medicine of Vilnius University, which consisted of the study authors. The questionnaire consisted of three blocks of questions (with a total of 6 questions) as follows: 1. questions about the children’s demographic data (gender, grade, age); 2. questions about bullying experiences, where respondents were asked about bullying experienced over the past six months at school, outside of school, and online (possible answers: “Almost never”, “Less than once a week”, “More than once a week”, “Almost every day”); and 3. questions about general well-being, including “Are you feeling happy?” (possible answers: “Yes”, “Partially”, “No”) and “Are you feeling healthy?” (possible answers: “Yes”, “Partially”, “No”).
The inclusion criteria for this study required that participants be students from grades 7 to 10. Additionally, parental consent was mandatory for a student’s participation, and the students themselves had to agree to take part in the study. Only questionnaires that were fully or partially completed were included in the analysis. The exclusion criteria were as follows: questionnaires completed by students not in grades 7 to 10, the absence of parental consent for the child’s participation, refusal of the student to participate, incomplete questionnaires, or questionnaires containing clearly incorrect or joke answers.

2.2. Statistical Analyses

To identify the smallest sample size for our research involving Lithuanian adolescents aged 12 to 17 (n = 237,861), we performed a sample size calculation utilizing a 95% confidence level, a standard deviation of 0.5, and a margin of error (confidence interval) of ±5%. According to our analysis, a minimum of 608 participants was required to achieve an adequate sample size.
Qualitative variables are presented using descriptive statistics of absolute (n) and percentage (%) frequencies. Quantitative data are presented as arithmetic means with standard deviations. Pearson’s chi-squared test (χ2) was utilized to assess if there was a statistically significant disparity between the frequencies that were expected and those that were observed in one or more categories. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was applied for the correlation analysis. To evaluate one dependent variable and several independent variables, a linear regression model was applied. The results are presented in figures and tables, and they were considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05. The statistical data analysis was performed using R (version 4.2.3) and Microsoft Excel.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics

In total, 4124 students from different cities and districts of Lithuania participated in this study. Of the respondents, 2014 (49.35%) were boys, 1943 (47.61%) were girls, and 124 (3.04%) indicated another gender. The average age of the respondents was 14.48 ± 1.15 years. In all, 1934 of the respondents studied in progymnasium classes (950 (23.92%) in the seventh grade and 984 (24.78%) in the eighth grade), and 2037 studied in gymnasium classes (1050 (26.44%) in the ninth grade and 987 (24.86%) in the tenth grade). All characteristics are presented in Table 1.

3.2. Bullying Prevalence

In the past six months, 3003 (74.20%) respondents had almost never experienced bullying at school, 677 (16.73%) experienced it less than once a week, 224 (5.53%) experienced it more than once a week, and 143 (3.53%) experienced bullying almost every day. Outside of school, 3468 (85.84%) respondents answered that they had almost never experienced bullying, 438 (10.84%) experienced bullying less than once a week, 86 (2.13%) experienced it more than once a week, and 48 (1.19%) experienced it almost every day. Regarding cyberbullying, 3242 (80.21%) responded that they had almost never experienced it, 536 (13.26%) experienced it less than once a week, 153 (3.79%) experienced it more than once a week, and 111 (2.75%) experienced it almost every day. Table 2 provides more detailed information about the bullying experiences of the students.

3.3. Happiness and Well-Being of Adolescents

In total, 1778 (48.81%) of the respondents felt happy, 543 (14.91%) did not feel happy, and 2428 (63.11%) felt partly happy. Additionally, 2428 (63.11%) of the respondents said they felt healthy, 279 (7.25%) felt unhealthy, and 1140 (29.63%) felt partly healthy. With regard to gender, 1101 (59.90%) boys and 620 (37.13%) girls felt happy, 1415 (74.63%) boys and 936 (51.63%) girls felt healthy, 185 (10.10%) boys and 323 (19.34%) girls felt unhappy, and 78 (4.11%) boys and 179 (9.87%) girls felt unhealthy (p < 0.001). A detailed comparison of subjective happiness and well-being with regard to gender is presented in Table 3.
Students who reported that they almost never experienced bullying at school were statistically significantly happier (54.2%) than those students who experienced bullying almost every day (26.7%, p < 0.001). Similar findings about subjective happiness were observed among students who reported that they almost never experienced bullying outside of school or online (52.2% and 52.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) and those students who experienced bullying in these forms almost every day (23.7% and 38.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). A detailed association between experienced bullying and students’ feelings of happiness is presented in Table 4.
Students who reported that they almost never experienced bullying at school were statistically significantly healthier (68.0%) than those students who experienced bullying almost every day (43.9%, p < 0.001). Similar findings about subjective health were observed among students who reported that they almost never experienced bullying outside of school or online (66.3% and 65.7%, respectively; p < 0.001) and those students who experienced bullying in these forms almost every day (42.1% and 57.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). A detailed association between experienced bullying and students’ sense of health is presented in Table 5.
The subjective feeling of happiness showed a weak negative association with bullying at school (ρs = −0.224) and outside of school (ρs = −0.207) and a very weak negative association with online bullying (ρs = −0.175) (p < 0.001). The feeling of well-being also showed a very weak negative association with bullying, with online (ρs = −0.110), at school (ρs = −0.197), and outside of school (ρs = −0.180) (p < 0.001).
Gender had a very weak negative association with bullying online (ρs = −0.056) and a very weak positive association with bullying at school (ρs = 0.040) (p < 0.05).
Age had a very weak negative association with bullying online (ρs = −0.045, p < 0.05), at school (ρs = −0.120, p < 0.001), and outside of school (ρs = −0.038, p < 0.05). A more comprehensive correlation matrix is shown in Table 6.

4. Discussion

4.1. Bullying and Its Prevalence

Bullying is a widespread phenomenon among children and adolescents. According to data presented by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) in 2019, 32% of respondents in this age group experienced bullying on at least one day in the past month, and 7.3% experienced bullying on six or more days [10]. Although bullying remains an issue among adolescents, some positive results were found during our study. The majority of the respondents did not experience bullying in any of the given environments (school, outside of school, or online) in the past six months, and only a small proportion experienced bullying almost daily. However, the problem remains significant: as many as one quarter of the students experienced bullying at least once at school, and about one fifth of the respondents experienced cyberbullying. This proves that bullying is a relevant problem among adolescents in Lithuania and that it requires attention. There is also a noticeable trend that experiencing bullying in one environment increases the likelihood of experiencing it in another environment. Therefore, if adolescents experience bullying at school, they may also be victims of bullying online or outside of school. This could be related to the fact that the factors that encourage bullying are similar and more related to the characteristics of the person, and bullying in different places is only a continuation of the bullying process. For instance, cyberbullying is often just a continuation of direct bullying [10]. Like our study, the literature shows that bullying remains an issue at school. For several years, one in five students has experienced bullying at school [16,17]. Although traditional bullying has been seen as a problem for a long time, cyberbullying has been increasing in recent years. A comparison of HBSC data from 2014 and 2022 showed an increase in online bullying among adolescents [3]; this supports our study results, which revealed that a significant proportion of adolescents experienced bullying online.
Our study results showed that girls were statistically significantly more likely to experience bullying at school than boys. These results are consistent with those of previous studies: surveys in 2017 and 2022 showed that girls experience more bullying at school [16,17]. The same result was found in a study conducted in Serbia [18]. Thus, it can be observed that girls are more likely to experience bullying at school. It was also found in our study that boys were more likely to report experiencing cyberbullying than girls. However, in other studies, girls were found to experience more online bullying [19,20]. Age also has a statistically significant correlation with bullying, with bullying decreasing as a child becomes older. This is consistent with the 2019 UNESCO data, which state that older children experience less bullying [10]. An evaluation of previous data from Lithuania noted that bullying is experienced more by younger adolescents [3]. Thus, it can be said that gender and age may influence the frequency of bullying among adolescents.

4.2. Happiness and Well-Being

This study’s results showed that about half of the respondents felt happy and a little more than half felt healthy. Significant problems with adolescents’ well-being are also indicated in the literature; for example, depressive symptoms are more prevalent among adolescents than young adults [21], and studies conducted in Denmark suggest that the psychological well-being of youth—especially girls—is decreasing [22]. In comparisons of subjective happiness and well-being, our results revealed that the boys were statistically significantly happier and healthier than the girls. A study conducted in Serbia, surveying 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old students, revealed that boys were more satisfied with their lives than girls were, and female gender was one of the most significant risk factors for developing depressive symptoms [18]. In another study performed in a Lithuania, it was found that one fifth of 9th–12th-grade students experienced depressed moods. Girls complained more often about poor sleep quality and well-being during the day [23].

4.3. Bullying’s Connection with Subjective Happiness and Well-Being

Bullying is one of the factors that can influence the happiness of adolescents. According to our study results, the majority of adolescents who have almost never experienced bullying are happier than those who have been bullied. Additionally, the majority of those who have been bullied almost daily feel unhappy or only partly happy. One Chinese study showed that multiple victimization is one of the strongest predictors of depression compared to individual demographic factors or parental divorce [24]. The literature also shows that cyberbullying is one of the most critical factors that can cause depression or anxiety symptoms [25]. Our study showed that bullying has a statistically significant negative association with subjective happiness. Still, it revealed that cyberbullying had the lowest impact on adolescents’ happiness when compared to other forms of bullying. HBSC 2022 survey data also showed that victims of bullying were more likely to feel unhappy, but there was no significant difference between traditional and online bullying [3]. Although the literature shows that cyberbullying correlates with symptoms of depression and anxiety, the strongest symptoms of depression and lowest subjective well-being were reported by adolescents who were bullies and victims and those who were only victims of online bullying [25]. Bullying at school has a similar impact regardless of sex. A positive school climate has been shown to reduce depressive symptoms [26]. Hence, teenagers who feel well at school are less stressed, have better relationships with classmates and teachers, and report greater life satisfaction [18].
Bullying can also be a cause of various physiological symptoms, such as headaches, sleep disorders [27], and back or stomach pain [15]. Previous studies have shown that youth who experience bullying are more likely to have health problems [27]. In addition, the prevalence of somatic complaints is directly related to the social environment of students and adolescents, including psychological violence or bullying [15]. According to the 2022 HBSC results, adolescents who bully or are bullied (both traditionally and online) are more likely to have psychosomatic complaints [3]. However, our study also revealed some positive results, such as many frequently bullied respondents indicating that they feel healthy or partly healthy. However, bullying does impact one’s subjective well-being, and a significant statistical relationship was discovered between bullying and well-being. Regardless of the environment where they experience bullying, with an increased frequency of bullying, an adolescent’s subjective sense of well-being decreases. According to the literature, bullying affects the well-being of girls more; it can be seen in our study that the girls felt healthier than the boys. According to data from the United States in 2017, from respondents who experienced bullying, girls complained about physical health more often (16.7%) than boys did (9.7%). In a 2022 study, more girls (17.1%) than boys (8.9%) experienced somatic symptoms [16,17]. Thus, it can be seen that bullying affects physical health regardless of gender but has a more significant impact on girls. Additionally, health problems caused by bullying can continue into adulthood; for example, men and women who were bullied in childhood have higher levels of inflammation, and women who experienced bullying have a higher risk of obesity many years after being bullied [11]. With the understanding that bullying is an important issue and is prevalent among our study participants, it can be said that it is an important factor in adolescents’ mental health, affecting their subjective happiness and subjective well-being now and into adulthood.

5. Conclusions

Our study revealed that bullying among Lithuanian adolescents is most prevalent at school. Girls are more likely than boys to experience bullying at school, while cyberbullying is more prevalent among boys. It was also found that bullying decreases with age. Our study demonstrated that adolescents’ mental health is a very important issue, as only half of the respondents felt happy and a little more than half felt healthy. One of the main factors that affects adolescents’ subjective feelings of happiness and well-being is bullying. However, boys are significantly happier and healthier, so it can be stated that girls are more affected. Considering our findings, it is important to promote bullying prevention programs in Lithuanian schools and to educate teachers, families, and students about bullying’s consequences and mental health.

6. Limitation

It is essential to recognize that this research has multiple limitations that hindered its ability to thoroughly examine happiness and well-being in adolescents. The research utilized a cross-sectional approach, which allowed for the identification of connections between different factors. However, it is crucial to note that the study could not determine causal relationships. Bullying is likely to contribute to a reduction in happiness and overall well-being among adolescents. Conversely, adolescents who perceive themselves as possessing poorer health or who are experiencing unhappiness may be at an increased risk of being targets of bullying. An important factor to consider is that this study employed non-standardized questionnaires to evaluate the happiness and well-being of adolescents. This concern could result in adolescents misinterpreting and incorrectly defining happiness and well-being. As a result, future studies should implement more objective measurement instruments since the existing questions primarily rely on personal assessments. Also, one of the limitations of this study is that it did not examine the economic or financial status of participants. Economic disadvantages and poverty have been linked to a higher incidence of bullying [28]. Future research should explore these factors, as victims are often from low-income families with lower parental education or employment levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and R.Š.; methodology, S.L. and R.Š.; software, R.Š. and S.L.; validation, S.L.; formal analysis, S.L. and R.Š.; investigation, R.Š. and M.K.S.; resources, S.L. and R.Š.; data curation, S.L. and R.Š.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L., R.Š. and M.K.S.; writing—review and editing, S.L., R.Š. and M.K.S.; visualization, R.Š.; supervision, S.L.; project administration, S.L. and R.Š. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine (Approval Code: KT-191; Approval date: 1 June 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to ethical approval requirements.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to all school administrations for their participation in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Méndez, I.; Jorquera, A.B.; Ruiz-Esteban, C.; Martínez-Ramón, J.P.; Fernández-Sogorb, A. Emotional Intelligence, Bullying, and Cyberbullying in Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Srinivasan, S.P.; Arumugam, C.; Rangeela, E.; Raghavan, V.; Padmavati, R. Bullying among Children and Adolescents in the SAARC Countries: A Scoping Review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pristatymas. Available online: https://hbsc.lt/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Pristatymas.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2025).
  4. Wolke, D.; Lereya, S.T. Long-Term Effects of Bullying. Arch. Dis. Child. 2015, 100, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. John, A.; Glendenning, A.C.; Marchant, A.; Montgomery, P.; Stewart, A.; Wood, S.; Lloyd, K.; Hawton, K. Self-Harm, Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and Young People: Systematic Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018, 20, e129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adolescent Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health (accessed on 6 February 2025).
  7. Lauriola, M.; Malerba, A.; Marini, M.; Parisse, C.; Prislei, L.; Bottesi, G.; Livi, S. Stability and Change in Intolerance of Uncertainty and Its Association with Interpretation Bias in Social Situations: A Longitudinal Study of Italian Adolescents. Adolescents 2024, 4, 564–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chemnad, K.; Aziz, M.; Abdelmoneium, A.O.; Al-Harahsheh, S.; Baghdady, A.; Al Motawaa, F.Y.; Alsayed Hassan, D.; Ali, R. Adolescents’ Internet Addiction: Does It All Begin with Their Environment? Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2023, 17, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Man, X.; Liu, J.; Xue, Z. Effects of Bullying Forms on Adolescent Mental Health and Protective Factors: A Global Cross-Regional Research Based on 65 Countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Armitage, R. Bullying in Children: Impact on Child Health. BMJ Paediatr. Open 2021, 5, e000939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Arseneault, L. Annual Research Review: The Persistent and Pervasive Impact of Being Bullied in Childhood and Adolescence: Implications for Policy and Practice. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2018, 59, 405–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mental Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response (accessed on 6 February 2025).
  13. Galson, S.K. Mental health matters. Public Health Rep. 2009, 124, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. In 2022 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2022.
  15. Šmigelskas, K.; Lukoševičiūtė, J.; Slapšinskaitė, A.; Vaičiūnas, T.; Bulotaitė, J.; Žemaitaitytė, M.; Šalčiūnaitė, L.; Zaborskis, A. Lietuvos Moksleivių Gyvensena ir Sveikata: 2018 m. Situacija ir Tendencijos, HBSC Tyrimas; LSMU: Kaunas, Lithuania, 2019; Available online: https://lsmuni.lt/media/dynamic/files/19493/1122finaldakraraportas.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  16. Student Reports of Bullying: Results From the 2017 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey|IES. Available online: https://nces.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/data/tables/student-reports-bullying-results-2017-school-crime-supplement-national-crime-victimization-survey?pubid=2019054 (accessed on 7 February 2025).
  17. Student Reports of Bullying: Results From the 2022 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey|IES. Available online: https://nces.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/data/tables/student-reports-bullying-results-2022-school-crime-supplement-national-crime-victimization-survey?pubid=2024109 (accessed on 7 February 2025).
  18. Skoric, D.; Rakic, J.G.; Jovanovic, V.; Backovic, D.; Soldatovic, I.; Zivojinovic, J.I. Psychosocial School Factors and Mental Health of First Grade Secondary School Students—Results of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Survey in Serbia. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0293179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Malta, D.C.; de Oliveira, W.A.; Prates, E.J.S.; de Mello, F.C.M.; Moutinho, C.d.S.; Silva, M.A.I. Bullying among Brazilian Adolescents: Evidence from the National Survey of School Health, Brazil, 2015 and 2019. Rev. Lat. Am. Enferm. 2022, 30, e3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Monteiro, A.P.; Marques, F.; Relva, I.C.; Simões, M.; Sani, A.I.; Correia, E. The Relation Between Bullying and Cyberbullying, Emotional Intelligence, and Empathy in Portuguese Adolescents. Adolescents 2024, 4, 620–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Varela, J.J.; Hernández, C.; Miranda, R.; Barlett, C.P.; Rodríguez-Rivas, M.E. Victims of Cyberbullying: Feeling Loneliness and Depression among Youth and Adult Chileans during the Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Winding, T.N.; Skouenborg, L.A.; Mortensen, V.L.; Andersen, J.H. Is Bullying in Adolescence Associated with the Development of Depressive Symptoms in Adulthood?: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. BMC Psychol. 2020, 8, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vaserytė, O.; Gruodytė-Račienė, R. Vyresnių klasių moksleivių sveikatą stiprinantis fizinis aktyvumas, miego kokybė ir psichoemocinė savijauta. Public Health 2024, 106, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, M.; Chan, K.L. Parental Absence, Child Victimization, and Psychological Well-Being in Rural China. Child Abus. Negl. 2016, 59, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hellfeldt, K.; López-Romero, L.; Andershed, H. Cyberbullying and Psychological Well-Being in Young Adolescence: The Potential Protective Mediation Effects of Social Support from Family, Friends, and Teachers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhai, B.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y. Perceived School Climate and Problematic Internet Use among Adolescents: Mediating Roles of School Belonging and Depressive Symptoms. Addict. Behav. 2020, 110, 106501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shaver, N.; Michaelson, V.; Pickett, W. Do Spiritual Health Connections Protect Adolescents When They Are Bullied: A National Study of 12,593 Young Canadians. J. Interpers. Violence 2022, 37, NP11034–NP11065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elgar, F.J.; Craig, W.; Boyce, W.; Morgan, A.; Vella-Zarb, R. Income Inequality and School Bullying: Multilevel Study of Adolescents in 37 Countries. J. Adolesc. Health 2009, 45, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Demographic characteristics.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics.
Variablen%
Gender
Boy201449.35
Girl194347.61
Other1243.04
Total4081100
Grade
795023.92
898424.78
9106026.44
1098724.86
Total3981100
Age
Mean14.48
Standard deviation1.15
Table 2. Prevalence of bullying experienced by students.
Table 2. Prevalence of bullying experienced by students.
Bullying Experiences in the Past 6 MonthsHow Often Have You Been Bullied at School?How Often Have You Been Bullied Outside of School?How Often Have You Been Bullied Online?
n%n%n%
Almost everyday1433.53481.191112.75
More than once a week2245.53862.131533.79
Less than once a week67716.7343810.8453613.26
Almost never300374.20346885.84324280.21
Total404710040401004042100
Table 3. Subjective happiness and well-being comparison with regard to gender.
Table 3. Subjective happiness and well-being comparison with regard to gender.
All RespondentsBoysGirls
Variablen%n%n%p
Are you feeling happy?
Yes177848.81110159.9062037.13<0.001
Partly132236.2955330.0072743.53
No54314.9118510.1032319.34
Total364310018391001670100
Are you feeling healthy?
Yes242863.11141574.6393651.63<0.001
Partly114029.6340321.2669838.50
No2797.25784.111799.87
Total384710018961001813100
Table 4. The association of bullying with students’ subjective sense of happiness.
Table 4. The association of bullying with students’ subjective sense of happiness.
Are You Feeling Happy?p
NoPartlyYes
How often have you been bullied at school?n%n%n%
Almost never30511.393434.5146854.2<0.001
Less than once a week13923.823940.920635.3
More than once a week4925.79449.24825.1
Almost everyday4638.34235.03226.7
Total53910013091001754100
How often have you been bullied outside of school?n%n%n%
Almost never38712.5110035.4162152.2<0.001
Less than once a week9926.217646.610327.2
More than once a week2739.72435.31725.0
Almost everyday2155.3821.923.7
Total53410013081001750100
How often have you been bullied online?n%n%n%
Almost never35912.3102035.1152852.6<0.001
Less than once a week11324.221145.214330.6
More than once a week3830.24535.74334.1
Almost everyday2829.83031.93638.3
Total53810013061001750100
Table 5. The association of bullying with students’ subjective sense of health.
Table 5. The association of bullying with students’ subjective sense of health.
Are You Feeling Healthy?p
NoPartlyYes
How often have you been bullied at school?n%n%n%
Almost never1655.874326.2193168.0<0.001
Less than once a week609.426140.931749.7
More than once a week2713.58341.59045.0
Almost everyday2621.14335.05443.9
27810011301002392100
How often have you been bullied outside of school?n%n%n%
Almost never2026.190227.6216966.3<0.001
Less than once a week4912.118244.917443.0
More than once a week1519.23139.73241.1
Almost everyday1231.61026.31642.1
27810011251002391100
How often have you been bullied online?n%n%n%
Almost never2026.684527.7200565.7<0.001
Less than once a week367.220040.226252.6
More than once a week2416.75236.16847.2
Almost everyday1515.02828.05757.0
Total27710011251002392100
Table 6. Correlation matrix of student wellness, sense of happiness, demographic data, and experiences of bullying.
Table 6. Correlation matrix of student wellness, sense of happiness, demographic data, and experiences of bullying.
HappinessWell-BeingBullying at SchoolBullying Outside of SchoolCyberbullyingAge
Happiness a
Well-being b0.530 **
Bullying at school c−0.224 **−0.197 **
Bullying outside of school d−0.207 **−0.180 **0.337 **
Cyberbullying e−0.175 **−0.110 **0.248 **0.260 **
Age f−0.030−0.046 *−0.120 **−0.038 *−0.045 *
Gender g−0.222 **−0.226 **0.040 *0.033−0.056 *−0.004
* <0.05, ** <0.001. Reference values: a, “No”; b, “No”; c, “Almost never”; d, “Almost never”; e, “Almost never”; f, 12 years old; g, boy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakalauskienė, M.K.; Šambaras, R.; Lesinskienė, S. Bullying Experiences Among Lithuanian Adolescents: The Associations Between Subjective Happiness and Well-Being. Psychiatry Int. 2025, 6, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030097

AMA Style

Sakalauskienė MK, Šambaras R, Lesinskienė S. Bullying Experiences Among Lithuanian Adolescents: The Associations Between Subjective Happiness and Well-Being. Psychiatry International. 2025; 6(3):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakalauskienė, Margarita Kubilevičiūtė, Rokas Šambaras, and Sigita Lesinskienė. 2025. "Bullying Experiences Among Lithuanian Adolescents: The Associations Between Subjective Happiness and Well-Being" Psychiatry International 6, no. 3: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030097

APA Style

Sakalauskienė, M. K., Šambaras, R., & Lesinskienė, S. (2025). Bullying Experiences Among Lithuanian Adolescents: The Associations Between Subjective Happiness and Well-Being. Psychiatry International, 6(3), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030097

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop