Next Article in Journal
Nature-Based Meditation Reduces Depressive Rumination and Stress in Adolescents and Young Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Depression in Multiple Sclerosis: Lifestyle Interventions as an Additional Therapeutical Approach: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Importance of Antipsychotic Treatment in Severe Mental Disorders

by
Pasquale Paribello
1,2,
Marco Solmi
3,4,5,6 and
Mirko Manchia
1,2,7,*
1
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
2
Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital Agency of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
3
SCIENCES Lab, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
4
Regional Center for the Treatment of Eating Disorders and On Track: The Champlain First Episode Psychosis Program, Department of Mental Health, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
5
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Clinical Epidemiology Program, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
6
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
7
Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Psychiatry Int. 2025, 6(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6020035
Submission received: 14 February 2025 / Accepted: 19 March 2025 / Published: 24 March 2025
Antipsychotics are the cornerstone of clinical management of severe psychiatric disorders. This heterogenous class of drugs has shown undoubtable efficacy in controlling illness activity in schizophrenia [1,2] and bipolar disorder [3], both in acute and maintenance phases. In addition, antipsychotics appear to significantly reduce mortality in patients with severe psychiatric disorders [4]. Even with crystal-clear evidence of such entity, there has been recent debate about whether antipsychotics could be discontinued in stable patients without psychopathological consequences.
An attempt to explore this research question came from a study by Moncrieff et al. [5], which reported the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), assessing the impact of gradual dose reduction in antipsychotics on functioning after 24 months in individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder with multiple episodes. The study had two main findings. First, gradual dose reduction in antipsychotics did not improve functioning. Second, patients in the dose reduction arm had an over twofold increase in the risk of severe relapse (hospitalization) compared to those in the maintenance arm. Moreover, eight vs. four patients died in the dose reduction vs. standard dose arm. These results clearly support the importance of continuing antipsychotic treatment for prevention of psychotic relapses.
In addition, Moncrief et al. [5] hypothesized that most of the impairment in social functioning and quality of life experience by patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders might be attributed to antipsychotics rather than to the detrimental effects that the disorder, especially if untreated, might exert on the person’s brain and behavior. However, despite the study design including very stable patients, which might have reduced the risk of finding increased relapse, the RCT failed to show superiority on functioning, and found a significantly increased risk of relapse. It is important to note that only 27% discontinued the antipsychotic in the dose reduction arm, suggesting that not only discontinuing, but even reducing the dose was not safe. This is consistent with previous studies showing that the most effective dose for antipsychotics should be between 0.6 and 1 defined daily dose (apart from olanzapine and perphenazine) [6].
Clearly, disentangling the drug’s effect from the detrimental impact of the disorder is extremely difficult and only longitudinal prospective studies in patient populations homogenous for stages of illness and for the type of pharmacological treatment could answer this question. Furthermore, although abrupt AP discontinuation can lead to withdrawal symptoms that may precipitate relapses, this is not true for all APs. Indeed, this class is quite heterogenous in terms of pharmacological profile, with some drugs (clozapine, quietapine, chlorpromazine) certainly more prone to producing rebound symptoms given their cholinergic affinity. But for those APs that have a simpler pharmacological profile, the most parsimonious explanation is that a reduction or suspension of the drug leads to biological reactivation of the disorder. In summary, while this study was important for exploring a difficult, yet extremely sensitive and clinically relevant, research question, we suggest caution in supporting this strategy as a beacon for clinical practice.
Overall, the RADAR trial was an important effort, an open-label trial lasting as long as 24 months that, however, substantially confirms that a dose reduction in antipsychotics not only is not beneficial on functioning but puts persons suffering from schizophrenia spectrum disorders at increased risk of relapse. Findings support the need to inform people with lived experience and their families that reducing the dose of antipsychotics might leave them at increased risk of relapse without improvement in functioning or side effects. Also, given that most antipsychotics are associated with side effects, novel medications with better tolerability profiles are becoming available and might improve long-term compliance to pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia [7].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., M.S. and P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M., M.S. and P.P.; writing—review and editing, M.M., M.S. and P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

M.S. received honoraria/has been a consultant for Angelini, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck, Otsuka. He is also co-founder of Mesas srl, and S2M srl. M.M. has received honoraria from Angelini, Lundbeck, Rovi, Johnson and Johnson, Fidia. P.P. has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huhn, M.; Nikolakopoulou, A.; Schneider-Thoma, J.; Krause, M.; Samara, M.; Peter, N.; Arndt, T.; Bäckers, L.; Rothe, P.; Cipriani, A.; et al. Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of 32 Oral Antipsychotics for the Acute Treatment of Adults with Multi-Episode Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Lancet 2019, 394, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schneider-Thoma, J.; Chalkou, K.; Dörries, C.; Bighelli, I.; Ceraso, A.; Huhn, M.; Siafis, S.; Davis, J.M.; Cipriani, A.; Furukawa, T.A.; et al. Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of 32 Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for the Maintenance Treatment of Adults with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 824–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kishi, T.; Ikuta, T.; Matsuda, Y.; Sakuma, K.; Okuya, M.; Mishima, K.; Iwata, N. Mood Stabilizers and/or Antipsychotics for Bipolar Disorder in the Maintenance Phase: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 4146–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vermeulen, J.; van Rooijen, G.; Doedens, P.; Numminen, E.; van Tricht, M.; Haan, L. de Antipsychotic Medication and Long-Term Mortality Risk in Patients with Schizophrenia; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychol. Med. 2017, 47, 2217–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moncrieff, J.; Crellin, N.; Stansfeld, J.; Cooper, R.; Marston, L.; Freemantle, N.; Lewis, G.; Hunter, R.; Johnson, S.; Barnes, T.; et al. Antipsychotic Dose Reduction and Discontinuation versus Maintenance Treatment in People with Schizophrenia and Other Recurrent Psychotic Disorders in England (the RADAR Trial): An Open, Parallel-Group, Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2023, 10, 848–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Taipale, H.; Tanskanen, A.; Luykx, J.J.; Solmi, M.; Leucht, S.; Correll, C.U.; Tiihonen, J. Optimal Doses of Specific Antipsychotics for Relapse Prevention in a Nationwide Cohort of Patients with Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2022, 48, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fabiano, N.; Wong, S.; Zhou, C.; Correll, C.U.; Højlund, M.; Solmi, M. Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Xanomeline-Trospium Chloride for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025, 92, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paribello, P.; Solmi, M.; Manchia, M. The Importance of Antipsychotic Treatment in Severe Mental Disorders. Psychiatry Int. 2025, 6, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6020035

AMA Style

Paribello P, Solmi M, Manchia M. The Importance of Antipsychotic Treatment in Severe Mental Disorders. Psychiatry International. 2025; 6(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6020035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paribello, Pasquale, Marco Solmi, and Mirko Manchia. 2025. "The Importance of Antipsychotic Treatment in Severe Mental Disorders" Psychiatry International 6, no. 2: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6020035

APA Style

Paribello, P., Solmi, M., & Manchia, M. (2025). The Importance of Antipsychotic Treatment in Severe Mental Disorders. Psychiatry International, 6(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6020035

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop