Previous Article in Journal
Speciesist Journalism: News Media Coverage on Farmed Animals and Care as a News Value
Previous Article in Special Issue
Portuguese–Brazilian Market: Quantitative Analysis of the Ratio Between Men and Women in the Writing of Telenovelas in Brazil and Portugal, from 1951 to 2025
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recasting Gender Roles: A Study of Indian Television Commercials (2011–2020)

by
Himika Akram
1,* and
Alicia Mason
2
1
Department of Communication, College of Communication and Information, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
2
Communication Program, Department of Communication, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS 66762, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Journal. Media 2025, 6(4), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6040166
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 2 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025

Abstract

Television commercials (TVCs) play a critical role in shaping and reflecting societal understandings of gender roles. Guided by cultivation theory and framing theory, this study examines gender representation in Indian TVCs, focusing on the gender distribution of primary characters, voiceovers, settings (home, outdoor, workplace), and product categories. A quantitative content analysis of 120 Indian TVCs from 2011 to 2020 was conducted, with coding performed by the researcher. Findings show that men were primary characters in 54.6% of ads, while women featured in 45.4%. Male voiceovers dominated at 70.1%, compared to 29.9% for females. Women appeared in home settings in 66.7% of TVCs, while men were predominant in workplace contexts (100%). No significant gender disparity was observed in outdoor settings. Product-wise, women were mostly linked with household and healthcare items, whereas men dominated sectors like banking, technology, and transport. The study highlights how repetitive portrayals of certain gender framings in TVCs contribute to the normalization of traditional gender roles, offering insights into the symbolic structures that reinforce these norms in Indian media culture.

1. Introduction

When it comes to mass media, television commercials or TVCs are considered powerful tools. TVCs influence buying behaviors, increase the sales of products, produce messages, entertain people, transmit cultural values, and convey information (Dermawan & Barkah, 2022; Jolodar & Ansari, 2011; Srikandath, 1991). Over the years, one of the biggest concerns among communication scholars has been how TVCs represent genders (Furnham & Mak, 1999; Kim & Lowry, 2005; Silverstein & Silverstein, 1974; Milner & Higgs, 2004) and thus play a vital role in reinforcing gender stereotypes, perpetuating traditional roles, and presenting unrealistic and cliché images of femininity and masculinity (Milner & Higgs, 2004; Valls-Fernández & Martínez-Vicente, 2007), which are even harmful in many aspects. Advertisements have a vital influence on the perceptions men deem valid regarding their gender identity (Eisend, 2010). Although they may take their references from various sources, including family, peers, sports, and other media, men persist in reaffirming the messages disseminated by markets (Zayer et al., 2019).
India, the second-largest populated country in the world, with a population of more than 1.4 billion (Nationsonline.org, 2022), and a hub of cultural richness and diversity, also has 22 officially recognized languages and 398 dialects, and the impact of television and its content on the audience has a vast impact on Indian society. Between 2011 and 2020, India witnessed a substantial change in advertisements’ substance and message quality. Over the last decade, Indian television commercials (TVCs) have evolved from repetitive, product-focused messaging to more creative storytelling that aligns with brand values. Modern TVCs now emphasize deeper consumer insights and social themes, moving beyond just listing product features (Gupta & Siri, 2021). This shift has enhanced their aesthetic appeal, presentation styles, and cultural relevance, making them more engaging and meaningful to audiences (Gupta & Siri, 2021). Additionally, Dash (2020) analyzed 538 Indian TV commercials in 2018 to examine the use of global, local, and glocal cultural appeals, finding that glocal appeals are most common, followed by global appeals, with local appeals being rare in Indian TV commercials. The research reveals a strong global influence in the cultural blending within contemporary Indian TV commercials, which was missing in earlier decades. Some of the most common global appeals that dominated Indian TVCs contained explicit display and discussion of sex, low power distance, individualism, technological dependence on machines, etc. (Dash, 2020). Nevertheless, how much of that change is reflected in gender portrayals? This study explores how the Indian TVC industry has depicted differences in gender representations from 2011 to 2020.
The root of the differences in gender portrayals in Indian TVCs lies in societal norms and expectations. For instance, by applying content analysis, Matthes et al. (2016) found that a country’s culture significantly impacts how gender roles are portrayed in media. Due to cultural and historical factors, India’s patriarchal society plays a significant role in portraying gender in the media (Gaur & Sarkar, 2024; Prabhash, 2005; Roy, 1998). TVCs are a powerful medium of communication. They reflect and strengthen these societal norms, forming the audience’s understanding of gender roles. For example, after a qualitative content analysis of 210 Indian TV commercials, Prasad (1994) found that most advertisements showed women as housewives, mothers, or sisters instead of as individuals. On the other hand, men are shown in more dominant positions, such as decision-makers, in Indian TV commercials (Sarkar, 2015). Promoting gender differences is a barrier to overcoming gender stereotypes in the media. While Prasad’s seminal study provided a foundational analysis of women’s portrayal on television, this study expands that scope by examining the representation of both genders. It also updates the inquiry by incorporating content from the digital era, reflecting shifts in media production and consumption over time. Additionally, this study introduces a quantitative dimension to the analysis, offering a broader empirical perspective that complements the earlier qualitative focus.
By analyzing television advertisements from 2011 to 2020, this study explores how gender representations between males and females are differentiated in Indian TVCs. Since this study was conducted in 2023, and by that time, most of the TVCs from the sample were not being circulated on TV channels anymore, TVCs were collected from YouTube. Combining this analysis with the application of previously known variables from the past, this study tries to minimize the gap in the less-researched topic of gender representations in developing and underdeveloped nations. This global viewpoint is crucial because it offers a more comprehensive picture of the field, which is still dominated mainly by research from the Western and more developed nations (Prieler & Centeno, 2013). This research does not claim to measure the effects of how TVCs influence the spread of gender stereotypes. However, given the quantitative content analysis method this study will use, those findings can serve as a helpful starting point for research into one of the many social effects that media can have.

2. Historical Background

It was the resurgence of the women’s movement in the 1960s that raised a voice about the portrayal of women in the mass media (Rakow, 1986). This was when the feminists successfully called attention to the differences between social and biological aspects of men and women. Advertisements came under the scrutiny of feminists because of the stereotypical and unrealistic depiction of women as sex objects, happy homemakers, dependent on their husbands, incompetent, and in ornamental roles (Courtney & Whipple, 1983; Ferguson et al., 1990; Lee, 2004; Milner & Higgs, 2004). Women were seen to be restricted to duties related to their “place” in the home, such as wife, mother, sex object, and housekeeper, whereas men were seen to be free to go everywhere else (Welter, 1966).
However, it was not until the 1970s that a large number of studies were systematically conducted to explore the link between portraying males and females in media and promoting gender stereotypes (Courtney & Whipple, 1983). According to Ahlstrand (2007), one of the pioneering studies of gender representation in television advertisements was conducted by McArthur and Resko (1975). The scholars analyzed 199 randomly selected American TVCs quantitatively (Ahlstrand, 2007). They developed a coding scheme to analyze seven variables: sex, product user, product authority, role, setting, product category, and scientific/non-scientific roles. This coding scheme was the most widely used worldwide in similar studies applying the same or revised coding scheme, particularly when the researchers wanted to see the comparisons within and between different countries and the prominent advertising trends (Ahlstrand, 2007).
Subsequent studies in the backdrop of relatively modern times also showed similar findings. As Grau and Zotos (2016) showed in their meta-analysis of scholarship related to gender stereotypes, women are often portrayed as weak and second-class citizens in advertisements (Ahlstrand, 2007). Consumer culture often reinforces gender stereotypes, portraying both men and women in reductive ways—particularly depicting women as submissive, subordinate, silent, and passive (Ali, 2018); motionless, aesthetic models whose roles are many a times ornamental (Lee, 2004). On the other hand, men are shown as being dominant and making decisions (Lee, 2004), experts in the workplace, the narrator of decisions about the home, economy, and family (Sarkar, 2015). Also, men are mostly portrayed as authoritative, independent, more persuasive than women (Van Hellemont & Van den Bulck, 2012), and are found in occupational settings more than women (Eisend, 2010).
India’s television broadcasting landscape is vast and diverse, reflecting the country’s multifaceted cultural and linguistic fabric. As “India Profile—Media” (2019), a study conducted by BBC News highlights, India has 900 private satellite TV stations, around half of which are news channels. OTT streaming platforms, along with multichannel satellite TV, are very popular among the audiences. According to Reporters Without Borders (2024), India’s public TV broadcaster Doordarshan operates in 23 languages in India and is watched by millions of viewers. In India, 1.4 billion inhabitants and 210 million homes have access to television sets. This extensive network ensures that television remains a primary medium for information and entertainment across urban and rural areas.

3. Theoretical View

This study uses a dual-theoretical lens—cultivation theory and framing theory—to understand how gender stereotypes are portrayed in Indian TVCs. Although many studies have found common trends like the numerical dominance of the male primary characters over the female primary characters, or the heavy presence of female characters in the domestic roles, this study attempts to transcend simple repetitions by theoretically unpacking the underlying mechanisms of these representations and their persistence in the dynamic environment of a non-western, developing country like India.
Introduced by George Gerbner (Gerbner & Gross, 1976) cultivation theory holds that viewers’ impressions about reality are shaped over time by long-term, cumulative exposure to television content. This argument is especially pertinent given TVCs are so common in India’s huge media environment, where television still rules (“India Profile—Media”, 2019). For example, as a qualitative study conducted by Akram (2025) shows, the way South Asian TVCs emphasize skin lightening products and focus on fair complexions influences audiences to conform to a narrow standard of beauty and fosters very high demand for skin lightening products. Due to constant delivery and reinforcement of the same message that “fair skin is synonymous to beauty”, dark skin is perceived to be undesirable by people in the South Asian region, and skin-lightening products have a very lucrative market (Akram, 2025).
Putting this perspective in the context of this study, constant exposure to consistent gendered representations—such as women routinely being shown in the caring or domestic roles, or males especially in the professional or authoritative spheres—can gently foster and normalize these images in the brains of the viewers. Cultivation theory helps position stereotypical gender portrayals not merely as a reflection of existing social norms, but as a part of a larger media system that contributes to their visibility and persistence. The more people watch television, the more their views are impacted by the narratives spread by television (Gerbner & Gross, 1976). Gerber and his colleagues later expanded this theory by introducing two more concepts: mainstreaming—where heavy viewing tends to minimize distinctions in world view across various social groups—and resonance, which describes how media messages become more powerful when they align with viewers’ real life experiences. These ideas enrich our understanding of how gender norms may become broadly accepted or even intensified within diverse audience segments.
Secondly, while this study does not evaluate the audience’s perceptions or responses, it draws selectively from framing theory to support the analysis of how gender roles are visually and narratively constructed in advertisements. Originating in the work of Goffman (1974) and later refined by Entman (1993), framing theory emphasizes how media selectively portrays and stresses particular facets of reality to shape the audience’s interpretation of events or ideas. By their very nature, ads use visual emphasis, strategic message and images to create certain frames around the items and the people they highlight. By means of strategic framing, advertisers create gender narratives—that is, regularly positioning males in positions of control, authority or problem solving, or women in roles connected with family and emotional labor. On the other hand, when women are consistently framed in nurturing or supportive roles, this repetition reinforces a narrow set of societal expectations about femininity (Goffman, 1974; Lindner, 2004). Santoniccolo et al. (2023) observed that advertisers aim to create a sense of comfort and acceptance by aligning their advertisements with the prevailing cultural values, which aligns with framing theory’s core logic of selection and emphasis. TVCs strategically tap into gender-specific stereotypes and narratives to shape how the characters and roles are portrayed and perceived. Through careful decisions in visual compositions, character positioning, non-verbal indications, voiceovers, and location choices that either openly or implicitly embed society gender expectations and norms, framing theory is essential for helping to understand not just what is shown but also, how it is displayed.
These theoretical angles, taken together, help to shape the approach of the study. The core ideas of these two theories directly affected the operationalizing of variables in the codebook and the study design. Cultivation theory guided the decision to utilize a decade-long sampling frame, supporting the selection of a period extensive enough to assess the cumulative nature of consistent gender portrayals in Indian TVCs. This approach allows for an examination of the overall patterns that viewers are repeatedly exposed to, contributing to their perceptions of reality. Framing theory influenced the construction of the specific coding categories—particularly the inclusion of variables such as character setting, types of roles performed, and voiceover genders, which are the key tools advertisers use to construct and emphasize gender frames. In this way, the theoretical framework shaped not only the interpretive lens for the findings, but also the precise selection and operationalization of the study’s empirical variables.

4. Research Hypotheses

Considering all the above-mentioned aspects, numbers establish numerical differences and systems of worth that rank people or organizations according to better or worse/more or less (Mau, 2019). According to Hofstede’s Masculinity Index (Hofstede, 2013), India’s score is 56, making it the fourth-ranked Asian masculine country, preceded by Japan, China, and the Philippines. Media consumers observe this numerical superiority of males over females daily through the TVCs. In that case, chances are high that the advertisers, who are also a part of the same population, will emphasize portraying the male predominance on screen more than the females as the primary characters. Research has found that male characters comprise most of the primary characters in TVCs (Eisend, 2010; Furnham & Paltzer, 2010; Ganahl et al., 2003; Santoniccolo et al., 2023). Based on these findings, the first hypothesis is
H1. 
More males than females will appear in Indian TVCs as primary characters.
One of the most used variables in studying gender representation in TVCs is voice-overs (Matthes et al., 2016). A robust finding in the research is the prevalence of male voiceovers, which are frequently regarded as the “voice of authority” (Silverstein & Silverstein, 1974; Van Hellemont & Van den Bulck, 2012). Studies often find a predominance of male voiceovers over female voiceovers in TVCs (Furnham & Paltzer, 2010; Furnham & Voli, 1989; Matthes et al., 2016; Prieler & Centeno, 2013; Valls-Fernández & Martínez-Vicente, 2007). Furnham and Mak (1999) found this aspect more evident in Asia than elsewhere. Hence, the second hypothesis is
H2. 
There are more male than female voiceovers in Indian TVCs.
Including the precise forms and types of portrayals may disclose society’s respect or lack thereof for a particular social group because numerical representation alone does not indicate the quality of the representations (Signorielli & Bacue, 1999). In India, women are working more than ever before. In 2001, the Indian government declared that year the “Year of Women’s Empowerment” and introduced the National Policy for the Advancement of Women (Kumari & Siotra, 2023). The India Employment Report (IER) 2024, published by the Institute for Human Dev and the International Labor Organization, showed that whereas the female labor force participation rate (FLFPR) was 38.9% in 2000, it increased to 46.8% during the 2017–2018 period and 58.2% in 2023–2024 (Kumar & ET BFSI, 2024; Pathak, 2024). But the patriarchal family structure and societal values remain essentially unchanged (Roy, 1998), which does not allow Indian media to work as agents of social change and freedom for women (Prabhash, 2005). Eisend (2010) showed, in his meta-analysis of television and radio advertisements, that the chances of women being depicted at home are 3.5 times higher than men being shown at home. Men are most often depicted in the public realm of employment, while women are restricted to a life of domesticity and family, in a home setting (Das, 2010; Gaur & Sarkar, 2024; Knoll et al., 2011; Prieler & Centeno, 2013; Roy, 1998). Regarding the occupations of the primary characters, several studies have revealed highly stereotypical findings showing women as homemakers (Lee, 2004; Santoniccolo et al., 2023) and men as working characters (Arima, 2003; Santoniccolo et al., 2023). Sarkar (2015) argues that Indian TVCs for a wide range of products, from bathing soap to cuisine spices, portray women as homemakers who show their skills in household chores. Also, in the Hindu religion, the ancient code of Manu and the ancient ideology of “Pativrata” (i.e., a woman who is sincerely obedient to her husband) have encouraged women to be dependent from cradle to the grave (Roy, 1998). Hence, the following are hypothesized:
H3a. 
More females than males will be depicted in home settings in Indian TVCs.
H3b. 
More males than females will be depicted in outdoor and workplace settings in Indian TVCs.
There are few consistent findings and gender portrayals, which could be because different studies frequently use different product categories (Prieler & Centeno, 2013). Most studies showed a strong connection between women and home and household products such as toiletries, cosmetics, and cleaning products (Furnham & Paltzer, 2010; Arima, 2003) and cooking products such as rice, oil, or cuisine spices (Sarkar, 2015). On the other hand, men are portrayed in television advertisements for telecommunication, electronics, computers, technology, cars (Das, 2010; Furnham et al., 2000; Ganahl et al., 2003; Matthes et al., 2016), agricultural and industrial goods, bikes (Sarkar, 2015), and medical and financial services (Rubio, 2018; Sarkar, 2015). Thus, the following hypotheses are offered:
H4a. 
More females than males will be depicted in Indian TVCs for home and household products.
H4b. 
More males than females will be associated with the TVCs of banking and technology, development, healthcare, and transportation in Indian television advertisements.

5. Method

The current study aims to identify the gender representations employed in TVCs in India between 2011 and 2020 and applies the content analysis method as a research approach. The lead author used a purposive sampling strategy based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria during the fall of 2023. A total of 120 TVCs were analyzed based on their prominence in the commercial sector. This study chose a sample size of 120, keeping the exclusion criteria in mind. The sample size is enough to have statistical power to identify the trends in a decade and makes it manageable to analyze each advertisement thoroughly. All television commercials were cast on major Indian entertainment channels. A stratified purposive sampling strategy was employed to ensure representation across different product categories and time periods, focusing on commercials that are prominent and easily accessible. A total of 120 unique television commercials released between 2011 and 2020 were selected for detailed analysis. This sample size was determined based on a careful consideration of several factors. Given the study’s focus on Hindi-language commercials only—excluding regional or non-Hindi advertisements—and limiting selection to one TVC per brand, the pool was intentionally narrowed. All commercials were sourced from YouTube due to the fact these TVCs from the assigned timeframe were not being circulated on TV channels anymore, requiring careful verifications of their actual release dates to ensure they matched the intended time period. Additionally, the selection was guided by several product categories relevant to the study’s objectives. Due to these deliberate criteria and the emphasis on authenticity and thematic consistencies, the available and suitable dataset naturally totaled 120 TVCs.
Content analysis was chosen as the primary research method due to its ability to systematically and objectively quantify patterns in communication, particularly in visual and verbal content like television commercials. According to Maier (2017), content analysis is a valuable descriptive tool that enables researchers to study patterns and communication processes over time, such as rhetorical strategies in political speeches. However, content analysis alone cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships between messages and their outcomes. To make causal claims, it needs to be combined with other methods or used as a foundation for further research (Maier, 2017). These considerations were carefully accounted for during the research design and coding process.
There was no fixed number of advertisements for any category. Coding instruments were developed to gather data to test the hypotheses posed. After that, the lead author beta-tested a sample frame to ensure that the coding sheet met the criteria of the variables that were being analyzed. These details are provided in the Coding & Analysis section of the Method chapter.

5.1. Sampling Strategy

Since the time frame for this study was 2011–2020 and the study itself was conducted in 2023, these TV commercials were not being circulated on Indian television channels anymore. For the subject of analysis and categorical evaluations, there was no secondary or third party. As a result, no inter-coder evaluation and reliability measures are reported.
Multiple contextual factors contributed to the decision of choosing this time frame of 10 years instead of limiting it to 2011–2015 or 2016–2020. It is understood that changes in societal conventions, technical improvements, and consumer tastes can all substantially impact how TVCs change in 10 years. For example, Indian TVCs from 2011 to 2015 focused on showcasing creative storytelling, delivering socially responsible messages, content diversity, etc. Television is still the primary and the most popular platform for delivering entertainment, information, and advertisements (Bhavsar, 2018). The latter half of the timeframe of this study, 2016–2020, witnessed characteristics such as digital transformation, digital analytics, user-generated content, etc. (Bhavsar, 2018) in Indian television advertisements. It was in July 2015 that the Government of India (GOI) launched Digital India as a campaign to ensure that Indian citizens can avail themselves of government services electronically by improving online infrastructure, increasing internet connectivity, or by making the country digitally empowered in the field of technology (Singh, 2019). Hence, it is easily assumed that, compared to the timeframe 2011–2015, marketers and consumers would have increased access to and use of video sharing platforms such as YouTube, Dailymotion, or social networking sites in the timeframe of 2016–2020 and that their usage would have only increased with each passing year. Selecting a decade will result in a more diverse sample. The lead author collected the Indian TV commercial advertisements from YouTube. To ensure accuracy and ease of access to commercial advertisements via digital platforms such as YouTube, the coding sheet included the YouTube link for each advertisement.

5.2. Video Characteristics

Apart from the variables such as primary character, voiceovers, setting, and product category as the units of analysis in this study, additional sample characteristics were coded, including the serial numbers of videos, brand name, product category, channel/uploader’s name, channel/uploader type (product’s official YouTube channel, advertising agency that produced that particular advertisement, or a person), number of channel subscribers, year of release, number of views, and number of likes. TVCs were uploaded from both organizational and individual YouTube account holders.
To ensure the accuracy of the TVC release year, each channel was studied individually to check if it had uploaded advertisements consistently (with an interval of 6–12 months) after its YouTube channel had opened. If it was found that uploads were consistent and the channel was up to date, the upload year was taken as the advertisement’s actual release year. Advertising agencies most usually upload advertisements with primary information such as product name, release year, length of the advertisement, etc., either at the very beginning or in the description box. For the official YouTube channels of the product, the upload date was taken as the TVC’s release date. For individual persons as uploaders, usually, if the uploader is somebody directly involved with that TV commercial advertisement as a model or composer/singer of the jingle, they mention the timeline in the same way the advertising agencies do, as described above. If not, the timing of their upload was cross-matched with the product’s official launch date as listed on the product website, and that information was mentioned in the “comment” column with the available link in the codebook.
If any advertisement’s release date was not possible to verify in either of these manners, the TVC was excluded from the sample.

5.3. Coding and Analysis

The gathered data were quantitatively analyzed using descriptive and inferential tests such as chi-square. Data collection took place over a four-week period during July 2023. The coding sheet was developed based on the previous studies conducted by Nassif and Gunter (2008) and Prieler and Centeno (2013). The units of analysis in this study were primary character, voiceover, settings of the primary character, and product categories. The coding scheme was rigorously developed and beta-tested by the lead author to ensure that it aligned with the study’s hypotheses and captured the necessary variables reliably.

5.3.1. Primary Character

A primary character is characterized as someone that is at least 18 years old and appears on camera for at least three seconds while speaking or being prominently featured (Prieler & Centeno, 2013). When multiple characters receive the same importance, the primary character is, according to the method offered by Nassif and Gunter (2008), determined by who (1) is central to the story, (2) appears in close-ups for the longest time, (3) appears for the longest time, (4) provides substantial information about the advertised good or service, (5) uses or holds the good, and (6) has the more extensive speaking part.

5.3.2. Voiceovers

Voiceovers add value to the TVCs by supporting storytelling, narratives, etc. Voiceovers included the voices of people who are not seen (Prieler & Centeno, 2013). Voiceovers exclude jingles, children’s voices, and primary characters’ dialogues.

5.3.3. Character Settings

Character settings of the primary characters were coded as workplace, home, other indoors (restaurant, gym, car, bus, super shop, etc.), outdoors (parks, streets, open market, stadium, beach, mountain, etc.), and others (artificial set) (Prieler & Centeno, 2013).

5.3.4. Product Categories

Six categories of products were analyzed. The included Home/household products (e.g., toiletries and cosmetics, cleaning products, cooking products); Banking and technology products (e.g., banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, technology products such as gadgets, electronics products); Development (e.g., industrial products, construction materials, real estate); Healthcare (e.g., healthcare products, hospitals, health technologies); Transportation (e.g., vehicle, airline, travel/tourism); and finally, Others, which categorized products that did not fall under any of the above categories.

5.4. Exclusion Criteria

TVCs featuring political campaigns, public services, announcements, commercial advertisements featuring children or cartoon figures as the primary characters, and advertisements lacking a human presence were excluded from this study. More than one TVC from the same brand was also excluded. This study also excluded non-Hindi TVCs because Hindi is the largest official language in India, which is spoken by 528 million people (Kanwal, 2020), and because of the lead author’s expertise in the Hindi language. Table 1 summarizes the variables, codes, and definitions of the terms.

5.5. Quantitative Methodological Analysis of Data

To test the hypotheses presented about the differences in the prominence of a specific gender across different variables such as primary characters, voiceovers, settings, and product categories, quantitative statistics were used. The findings of this study used chi-square tests of the advertisements collected because most variables were categorically and nominally structured.
Based on the sample and sampling strategy described and the hypotheses posed, the following section of the thesis documented the results, presented as the Results, followed by the Discussion and Limitations section.

6. Results

The results of this study were based on chi-square analysis and descriptive statistics that were performed on a total of 120 unduplicated Indian television advertisements as samples. Samples were collected from the video-sharing platform YouTube. Collected samples consisted of 40% home/household (n = 48), 24% banking and technology (n = 29), 13% transportation (n = 16), 10% development (n = 12), 6% healthcare (n = 8), and 0.05% other (n = 7) category of products. Approximately 33% of these commercials were uploaded by advertising agencies that were directly involved in their production (n = 40), 59% were uploaded by the products’ official YouTube channels (n = 71), and 8% were uploaded by individuals who were either costume designers or models for the TVC or random individual uploaders who mentioned the advertisement circulation date in the headline or in the description, or their upload date was matched with the product’s official launch date (n = 8%).
The TVCs in this study averaged M = 1,483,425 views and M = 3165.1 likes, with the YouTube Channels averaging M = 175,094 subscribers.
The samples contained seven TVCs from 2011 (5.8%), nine TVCs from 2012 (7.5%), 11 TVCs from 2013 (9.1%), seven TVCs from 2014 (5.8%), 20 TVCs from 2015 (16%), 12 TVCs from 2016 (10%), 22 TVCs from 2017 (19%), 10 TVCs from 2018 (8.3%), 12 TVCs from 2019 (10%), and 10 TVCs from 2020 (8.3%). Figure 1 presents an at-a-glance picture of the number of TVCs collected for this study that were released between 2011 and 2020.
H1 hypothesized that more males than females will appear in Indian television advertisements as primary characters. To test this hypothesis, descriptive statistics were computed. In the total sample of n = 120, advertisements with a primary character totaled n = 108. Males scored higher (N = 59, 54.6%) than females (N = 49, 45.4%) as primary characters in Indian television advertisements. The findings from this test support H1.
To test H2, which hypothesized there will be more male voiceovers than female voiceovers in Indian television advertisements, a chi-square analysis was conducted. The results found significant differences χ2 (1, N = 89) = 32.20, p < 0.001 between male and female voiceovers. Male voiceovers were significantly higher (69.7%) than female voiceovers (30.3%). This finding supports H2.
H3a hypothesized that more females than males are depicted in home settings in Indian television advertisements; a chi-square analysis was performed. The results found significant differences χ2 (1, N = 108) = 12.57, p < 0.001 between male and female portrayal in home settings. Females were shown in home settings significantly more frequently (66.7%) than males (33.3%). Thus, H3a is supported.
To test H3b, which stated that more males than females will be depicted in outdoor and workplace settings in Indian television advertisements, a chi-square analysis was performed. The results found significant differences χ2 (1, N = 108) = 13.36, p < 0.001 between male and female portrayal in workplace settings. Males were shown in workplace settings significantly more frequently (100%) than females (0%). This finding supports H3b. However, the second half of the hypothesis was not supported. No significant differences χ2 (1, N = 14) = 0.286, p > 0.001 were found between males and females in outdoor settings. The male–female ratio was 60% to 40% in outdoor settings.
To test H4a, which stated that more females than males will be depicted in Indian television advertisements for home and household products, a chi-square analysis was performed. The results found significant differences χ2 (1, N = 108) =37.32, p < 0.001 between male and female portrayal in ads for home and household products. Females were shown in advertisements for home and household products significantly more frequently (80%) than males (20%). This finding supports H4a.
To test H4b, which stated that more males than females will be associated with the advertisements for banking and technology, development, healthcare, and transportation in Indian television advertisements, a chi-square analysis was performed for each category. The results found significant differences χ2 (1, N = 108) = 19.84, p < 0.001 in banking and technology category; χ2 (1, N = 108) = 10.17, p < 0.001 in the development category; and χ2 (1, N = 108) = 10.52, p < 0.001 in the transportation category between male and female portrayal. In the banking and technology, development, and transportation categories, males (95.70%, 100%, and 93.30%, respectively) were depicted significantly more frequently than females (4.30%, 0%, and 6.70%, respectively). However, the hypothesis was not supported in the healthcare category. No significant differences χ2 (1, N = 108) = 3.06, p > 0.001 were found between males and females in this category of advertisement, which led to H4b being partially supported. To better illustrate the key gender-related findings of the content analysis, as shown in Figure 2, gender distribution in Indian television advertisements (2011–2020) reveals that men were predominantly featured in workplace, transportation, and technology settings, while women were more visible in home settings and household product categories. Figure 2 also highlights the stark imbalance in voiceover roles, where male dominance is evident.

7. Discussion

Empirical evidence and studies suggest that the stereotypical portrayals of gender are widespread in television advertisements (Eisend, 2010; Furnham & Mak, 1999; Ganahl et al., 2003; Matthes et al., 2016). Gender stereotyping is ubiquitous in Indian television advertisements as well, and a byproduct of such stereotyping is the increasing cultural pressure on women to represent themselves and behave in a certain way in real life (Sarkar, 2015). As Prabhash (2005) put it, media can function both as a mechanism of social control and as a tool for manufacturing public consent. Its significant influence in shaping and reflecting societal realities enables it to sway public opinion and garner support for specific social, political or ideological agendas. In the context of India, most existing studies on television advertisements have either focused solely on the portrayal of women or employed qualitative methods. This study contributes to the field by offering a decade-long, quantitative analysis of gender portrayal in Indian TV commercials, encompassing both male and female representations. Rather than showing a shift toward gender parity, the findings reveal that male representation still outweighs female representation, suggesting a continued reinforcement of gender hierarchies in televised advertising content.
Numerical representation and product categories will be discussed together because the former leads to the latter. There is a connection between Hofstede’s Masculinity Score and numerical representation of male characters’ predominance over female characters (Milner & Collins, 2000). These findings support prior studies. There was a significant difference between male and female representation in Indian television commercials and each gender’s association with certain product categories. Traditional gender norms and assumptions that portray males as the main breadwinners and decision-makers and women in caregiving roles (Das, 2010) have long shaped Indian society. Due to these prejudices, male protagonists who exude prosperity, authority, or leadership are frequently preferred in TVCs. Additionally, family values and relationships are highly valued in Indian culture (Das, 2010). As per Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension (Hofstede, 2001), India is a high-power distance culture with a score of 72. Such power distance is reflected in the frequencies of gender representations in TVCs. A big reason behind males outnumbering females as the primary characters could be, as Neale et al. (2015) argued, that both male and female customers equally accept products and brands associated with or endorsed by males. But males have a rejection tendency towards feminine products or brands that target females: for example, a car that targets the female base (Neale et al., 2015). This could be a reason why advertisers recruit more male models than female models as primary characters.
The predominance of male characters in Indian TVCs leads to the next part of the discussion, which is product categories. This study reveals significant differences in the portrayal of gender across product categories. Women are heavily featured in the advertisements of home/household product categories such as toiletries, cleaning, cooking products, etc. The rest of the categories, such as banking, technology, transportation, and development, are heavily dominated by men, and women are notably underrepresented. Even though in health categories, women outnumbered men as primary characters, they are mainly shown as either moms who are concerned about the health of their family members or as housewives who get body aches due to doing chores all the time, instead of being shown in high-status roles such as medical professionals. According to Gender bias & inclusion in advertising in India (Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media and UNICEF, 2021), women only represent 11% of workers in healthcare. Hence, the number of women outnumbering men in the health category of advertisements was unexpected.
The reason behind such stereotypical representations in product categories could be, as Wolf (2009) suggested, that the expression of modern feminism works differently in India. Indian women view equality as something family-centered instead of individual-centered, and still, they prioritize family and value their roles at home. That is why it is believed that household products will draw more consumers if females market them in television commercials as primary characters. By doing so, these advertisements uphold traditional gender roles for women in society. Product categories such as banking and technology, development, and transportation overall showed significant differences between male and female representation because these industries have historically been male-dominated. The quote, “Home and childcare taste sweeter to women while business and profession taste sweeter to men,” has long enjoyed unquestioning social acceptance in Indian society (Sivakumar & Manimekalai, 2021). In India, males are socially raised in ways that prepare them for management and leadership roles characterized by competitiveness, aggression, and risk-taking behaviors (Sivakumar & Manimekalai, 2021).
Categories such as health and development were not found to be used by previous studies conducted with similar methods; hence, comparison was not possible. However, this speaks for the novel value of the present findings.
Regarding voiceovers, as Paek et al. (2010) showed, there is a connection between a higher masculinity rate and a higher number of male voiceovers, and that trend is more prevalent in Asia and Africa (Furnham & Mak, 1999; Grau & Zotos, 2016). Also, in this study, it was noticed that there is a close association between the gender of the primary characters in the TVCs and voiceovers (Eisend, 2010; Paek et al., 2010). The number of male primary characters is higher in almost every product category, apart from the home, household, and health products. That is the reason the number of male voiceovers is significantly higher than the number of female voiceovers. One reason behind this could be because male voice is often associated with authority (McArthur & Resko, 1975; Silverstein & Silverstein, 1974).
When it came to character settings, prior works have found women in home settings (Furnham & Paltzer, 2010; Das, 2010) and men in workplace settings (Prieler & Centeno, 2013), and some studies found men used in outdoor settings more frequently than women (Prieler & Centeno, 2013; Furnham & Voli, 1989; Milner & Higgs, 2004; Valls-Fernández & Martínez-Vicente, 2007). The cultural norms in India dictate that women should be modest and reserved. As discussed in this study several times, Indian society is mostly traditional. Hence, advertisements portray women in a home setting to create a benchmark for the ideal Indian woman who is devoted to her family and the homemaker role.
Like many other patriarchal societies, there are still disparities in the labor force (Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media and UNICEF, 2021), working environment, and pay rates between men and women (Dutta, 2017). Historically, too, there have been limited opportunities for women. However, this study did not find significant differences between men and women in outdoor settings, probably because technological and generational change is occurring along with change in consumers’ tastes and lifestyles.
These findings can be further understood through the lens of cultivation theory and framing theory, which guided the theoretical framework of this study. Cultivation theory suggests (Gerbner & Gross, 1976) that repeated exposure to similar media messages over time can shape viewers’ perceptions of reality. In this study’s case, the persistent portrayal of women in domestic settings and caregiving roles, and men in positions of authority and professional spaces, may contribute to the normalization of these gender roles in society. Framing theory (Goffman, 1974; Entman, 1993) helps explain how these portrayals are constructed—through selective use of visuals, voiceover, settings, and roles that highlight traditional gendered expectations. These theoretical perspectives clarify the symbolic and structural strategies used by advertisers to align with dominant culture norms, thereby reinforcing gender hierarchies in Indian media narratives.

8. Limitations

Like any other study, this study also had several limitations. Firstly, it did not have intercoder reliability. Also, considering India’s cultural richness, the study of only Hindi advertisements might not give us the whole picture. Despite Hindi being the most prominent official language in India, there are 21 other officially recognized languages there. Thirdly, the strategy of selecting no more than one advertisement from each brand filtered out a vast number of advertisements since the sourcing platform was YouTube. For the sake of generalizability, 120 advertisements are not enough for a study covering a period of 10 years. A bigger sample size would have given us a more reliable picture. Another limitation was that the numbers of advertisements in each category and each year were not equal. Hence, every category might not have reflected the real scenario in India.
Another limitation of this study is that the theoretical perspectives and literature reviews are heavily dominated by Western scholarship. While the study attempts to adapt and apply these frameworks and findings to the Indian setting, the availability of widely cited, India-specific theoretical models remains limited. As such, the interpretation of gender representation in Indian advertising is partially shaped by frameworks not originally developed for this context. Future research should aim to expand and deepen locally grounded theoretical contributions.
Finally, this study focused on a select set of variables—such as gender of primary characters, voiceover presence, settings, and product categories—which were chosen based on their direct relevance to the research objectives and feasibility of analysis. However, this limited scope is acknowledged as a potential constraint. Future studies could benefit from incorporating a broader range of variables, including emotional tone, language use, interaction dynamics, and non-verbal cues, to offer deeper insight into gender portrayal and media influence.

9. Future Research and Conclusions

This study reveals the presence of gender stereotypes in Indian television advertisements. The results found from this study confirm most of what the earlier studies have shown. Traditional countries in Asia demonstrate more gender stereotypes in comparison to their Western counterparts. Women are more likely to be shown in a home setting and associated with home and household products than their male counterparts. Also, women are not considered to be dependable for voiceovers, which require specific characteristics such as authority and expertise. On the other hand, men are more likely to be featured in other categories of products such as finance, technology, transportation, etc., depicted in workplace settings more frequently than women, and considered more reliable for voiceovers than their female counterparts.
Considering India’s vastness, quantitative studies of this kind are surprisingly few. Hence, this one can be a good steppingstone to explore further aspects of this topic. As media framing theory holds, mass media may use different frames to show negative issues in a positive light and influence viewers’ perceptions of reality on different issues. For this study specifically, the media use a gender frame, and to ensure a positive reception of their products among consumers, they capitalize on the prevailing stereotypes. On the other hand, repeated exposure to such stereotypes makes them a ready reference for the audience and strengthens viewers’ existing beliefs.
Considering that Indian culture is highly diverse and vast, this country offers immense potential for conducting studies related to communication. In the future, other forms of media can also be added to TVCs, such as newspapers, magazines, social media, etc. The quantitative findings from this study can be supplemented with qualitative elements such as interviews with advertisers and consumers to understand what motivates them to produce and consume gender-stereotypical content. Future research can also investigate the influence of such stereotypes on Indian children and adolescents. Furthermore, it is essential to measure the efficacy of various strategies aimed at challenging and mitigating gender stereotypes in Indian television advertisements. In the future, a longitudinal study can be conducted to analyze gender portrayals in India over time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A.; Software, H.A.; Validation, A.M.; Investigation, H.A.; Data curation, H.A.; Writing—original draft, H.A.; Writing—review & editing, H.A. and A.M.; Supervision, A.M.; Project administration, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahlstrand, M. (2007). Gender stereotyping in television advertisements: A case of Austrian state. Available online: https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:1018680/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2023).
  2. Akram, H. (2025). Colorism in advertising: A qualitative analysis of fairness cream TVCs in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh (2011–2020). Qeios, 7(2), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ali, S. (2018). Stereotyping in consumer culture: An analysis of representing gender stereotypical roles of women in television advertising in Pakistan. International Journal of Media, Journalism and Mass Communications (IJMJMC), 4(4), 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arima, A. N. (2003). Gender stereotypes in Japanese television advertisements. Sex Roles, 49(1/2), 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhavsar, R. (2018). The burgeoning digital media consumption: A challenge for traditional television and advertising industries—An analysis. Amity Journal of Media & Communication Studies, 8(1), 17. [Google Scholar]
  6. Courtney, A. E., & Whipple, T. W. (1983). Sex stereotyping in advertising. Lexington Books. [Google Scholar]
  7. Das, M. (2010). Gender role portrayals in Indian television ads. Sex Roles, 64(3–4), 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dash, A. K. (2020). Cultural appeals in Indian TV commercials. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 1(1), 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dermawan, E. M., & Barkah, C. S. (2022). Effective communication in advertising. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dutta, S. (2017). Indian women in the workplace: Problems and challenges. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(3), 152–159. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisend, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of gender roles in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(4), 418–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ferguson, J. H., Kreshel, P. J., & Tinkham, S. F. (1990). In the pages of Ms.: Sex role portrayals of women in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Furnham, A., & Mak, T. (1999). Sex-role stereotyping in television commercials: A review and comparison of fourteen studies done on five continents over 25 years. Sex Roles, 41(5/6), 413–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Furnham, A., Mak, T., & Tanidjojo, L. (2000). An Asian perspective on the portrayal of men and women in television advertisements: Studies from Hong Kong and Indonesian television. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(11), 2341–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Furnham, A., & Paltzer, S. (2010). The portrayal of men and women in television advertisements: An updated review of 30 studies published since 2000. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 216–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Furnham, A., & Voli, V. (1989). Gender stereotypes in Italian television advertisements. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33(2), 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ganahl, D. J., Prinsen, T. J., & Netzley, S. B. (2003). A content analysis of primetime commercials: A contextual framework of gender representation. Sex Roles, 49(9/10), 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gaur, S., & Sarkar, A. (2024). Deconstructing gender stereotypes in Indian advertising: Insights from Media and “Bulbbul”. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 23751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media and UNICEF. (2021, April). Gender bias and inclusion in advertising in India. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/rosa/media/13816/file/Full%20Report%20-%20Gender%20Bias%20&%20Inclusion%20in%20Advertising%20in%20India%20-%20April%202021.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2023).
  21. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston Northeastern University Press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 761–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gupta, S. K., & Siri, V. S. (2021). Indian television commercials in transition: A study of new emerging practices. Journal of Mass Communication & Journalism, 11(3), 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures and organizations: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hofstede, G. (2013). National cultural dimensions. Available online: http://www.geert-hofstede.com/ (accessed on 17 May 2023).
  27. ”India Profile—Media”. (2019, April 29). BBC News. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-12557390 (accessed on 22 June 2025).
  28. Jolodar, S. Y. E., & Ansari, M. E. (2011). An investigation of tv advertisement effects on customers’ purchasing and their satisfaction. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(4), 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kanwal, S. (2020). India—Most common languages 2011. Statistica. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/616508/most-common-languages-india/ (accessed on 29 July 2023).
  30. Kim, K., & Lowry, D. T. (2005). Television commercials as a lagging social indicator: Gender role stereotypes in Korean television advertising. Sex Roles, 53(11–12), 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Knoll, S., Eisend, M., & Steinhagen, J. (2011). Gender roles in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 30(5), 867–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, V., & ET BFSI. (2024, July 22). Economic survey 2024: Indian economy likely to grow at 6.5–7% in FY25. ETBFSI.com; ETBFSI. Available online: https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/policy/economic-survey-2024-key-highlights/111920557 (accessed on 22 June 2025).
  33. Kumari, S., & Siotra, V. (2023). Indian females in the twenty-first century: How they have fared? An analysis using geospatial techniques. GeoJournal, 88, 4279–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, C. W. (2004). Gender role stereotyping in television commercials—The case of Singapore. Advertising & Society Review, 5(3), 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lindner, K. (2004). Images of women in general interest and fashion magazine advertisements from 1955 to 2002. Sex Roles, 51(7/8), 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maier, M. A. (2017). Content analysis: Advantages and disadvantages. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mastro, D. E., & Stern, S. R. (2003). Representations of race in television commercials: A content analysis of prime-time advertising. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(4), 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Matthes, J., Prieler, M., & Adam, K. (2016). Gender-role portrayals in television advertising across the globe. Sex Roles, 75(7–8), 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mau, S. (2019). Numbers matter! The society of indicators, scores, and ratings. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 29(1–2), 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McArthur, L. Z., & Resko, B. G. (1975). The portrayal of men and women in American television commercials. The Journal of Social Psychology, 97(2), 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Milner, L. M., & Collins, J. M. (2000). Sex-role portrayals and the gender of nations. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Milner, L. M., & Higgs, B. (2004). Gender sex-role portrayals in international television advertising over time: The Australian experience. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nassif, A., & Gunter, B. (2008). Gender representation in television advertisements in Britain and Saudi Arabia. Sex Roles, 58(11–12), 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nationsonline.org. (2022). Countries of the world by population. Available online: https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/population-by-country.htm (accessed on 22 July 2023).
  45. Neale, L., Robbie, R., & Martin, B. (2015). Gender identity and brand incongruence: When in doubt, pursue masculinity. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(5), 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paek, H.-J., Nelson, M. R., & Vilela, A. M. (2010). Examination of gender-role portrayals in television advertising across seven countries. Sex Roles, 64(3–4), 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pathak, H. (2024). Enhanced female workforce participation in economic activity: Data shows improved employment indicators over last six years. Pib.gov.in. Available online: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2074399 (accessed on 22 June 2025).
  48. Prabhash, J. (2005). Mediated rights: Media, women and human rights in India. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 66(1), 53–74. [Google Scholar]
  49. Prasad, N. (1994). A vision unveiled. Har Anand Publications. [Google Scholar]
  50. Prieler, M., & Centeno, D. (2013). Gender representation in Philippine television advertisements. Sex Roles, 69(5–6), 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rakow, L. F. (1986). Rethinking gender research in communication. Journal of Communication, 36(4), 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Reporters Without Borders. (2024). India | RSF. Rsf.org. Available online: https://rsf.org/en/country/india (accessed on 22 June 2025).
  53. Roy, A. (1998). Images of domesticity and motherhood in Indian television commercials: A critical study. The Journal of Popular Culture, 32(3), 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rubio, M. D. S. (2018). A multimodal approach to analyzing gender stereotypes in contemporary British TV commercials: “Women and men at work”. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(2), 185–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T., Paradiso, M. N., & Rollè, L. (2023). Gender and media representations: A review of the literature on gender stereotypes, objectification and sexualization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sarkar, S. (2015). Gender stereotyping in product promotion: A dominant tool of advertising in Indian media. International Journal of Media, Journalism and Mass Communications, 1(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  57. Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40(7/8), 527–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Silverstein, A. J., & Silverstein, R. (1974). The portrayal of women in television advertising. Federal Communications Bar Journal, 27, 71–93. [Google Scholar]
  59. Singh, R. (2019, May 8). Digital India—Campaign launched by the Government of India (GOI). CATKing Educare. Available online: https://catking.in/digital-india/#:~:text=Digital%20India%20was%20launched%20on (accessed on 1 August 2023).
  60. Sivakumar, I., & Manimekalai, K. (2021). Masculinity and challenges for women in Indian culture. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(5), 427–436. [Google Scholar]
  61. Srikandath, S. (1991). Cultural values depicted in Indian television advertising. Gazette, 48(3), 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Valls-Fernández, F., & Martínez-Vicente, J. M. (2007). Gender stereotypes in Spanish television commercials. Sex Roles, 56(9–10), 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Van Hellemont, C., & Van den Bulck, H. (2012). Impacts of advertisements that are unfriendly to women and men. International Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 623–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Welter, B. (1966). The cult of true womanhood. University of Pennsylvania. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wolf, N. (2009). Afghanistan’s feminist revolution. Available online: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/afghanistan-s-feminist-revolution (accessed on 10 October 2023).
  66. Zayer, L. T., McGrath, M. A., & Castro-González, P. (2019). Men and masculinities in a changing world: (De)legitimizing gender ideals in advertising. European Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 238–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Year-wise breakdown for the number of TVCs.
Figure 1. Year-wise breakdown for the number of TVCs.
Journalmedia 06 00166 g001
Figure 2. Gender distribution across key variables in Indian television advertisements (2011—2020), including primary characters, voiceovers, settings, and product categories.
Figure 2. Gender distribution across key variables in Indian television advertisements (2011—2020), including primary characters, voiceovers, settings, and product categories.
Journalmedia 06 00166 g002
Table 1. Variables and Coding Framework.
Table 1. Variables and Coding Framework.
VariableCodeDefinition
Primary CharacterPrimary character
0 = No primary character
1 = Male primary character
2 = Female primary character
A primary character is 18 and appears on camera for at least three seconds while speaking or being prominently featured (Prieler & Centeno, 2013). When multiple characters received the same importance, we identified the primary character as one who (1) was central to the story, (2) appeared in close-ups for the longest time, (3) appeared for the longest time, (4) provided substantial information about the advertised good or service, (5) used or held the good, and (6) had the more extensive speaking part (Nassif & Gunter, 2008).
Voiceover0 = None
1 = Male
2 = Female
3 = Both
The voices of those who could not be seen were heard through voiceovers. There were no children’s voices or voices that could only be heard singing in voiceovers (Prieler & Centeno, 2013).
Character
Setting
1 = Home
2 = Workplace
3 = Other indoor
4 = Outdoor
5 = Other (artificial)
The location where the main character first appears in the advertisement serves as the setting (Mastro & Stern, 2003). The dominant setting was coded if multiple settings were present. The main character’s perspective was used to code the environment.
For instance, the context would be “workplace” for a waiter serving food in a restaurant, but “other indoors” for the customer receiving the service. (Prieler & Centeno, 2013) If the customer is the primary character, the setting would be coded as “Other indoors.” If there was no primary character and the TVC was a concoction of multiple stories in different settings, each introducing the product in their respective setting, the majority of the characters’ settings were counted. In ads where the primary character was seen in multiple settings, then the setting where the product was introduced was coded.
Product Categories1 = Home/household products
2 = Banking and technology
3 = Healthcare
4 = Development
5 = Transportation
6 = Others
Home/household products—toiletries, cosmetics, cleaning, and cooking products.
Banking, technology—finance, gadgets, electronics, and insurance companies.
Healthcare—healthcare products, health technologies, hospitals.
Development—industrial products, construction materials, real estate.
Transportation—vehicle, airline, travel, tourism
Others—General products that do not fall under the above categories.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akram, H.; Mason, A. Recasting Gender Roles: A Study of Indian Television Commercials (2011–2020). Journal. Media 2025, 6, 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6040166

AMA Style

Akram H, Mason A. Recasting Gender Roles: A Study of Indian Television Commercials (2011–2020). Journalism and Media. 2025; 6(4):166. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6040166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akram, Himika, and Alicia Mason. 2025. "Recasting Gender Roles: A Study of Indian Television Commercials (2011–2020)" Journalism and Media 6, no. 4: 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6040166

APA Style

Akram, H., & Mason, A. (2025). Recasting Gender Roles: A Study of Indian Television Commercials (2011–2020). Journalism and Media, 6(4), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6040166

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop