Error in Table 6
In the original publication Meier et al. 2022, we made a mistake in Table 6, where we slipped in the columns during layout and therefore transmitted errors in the values. Below, we present the corrected table. These mistakes do not affect the data and results presented in the text, or the article’s conclusions (Meier et al. 2022).
Table 6.
Total Innovations selected in the five markets.
Table 6.
Total Innovations selected in the five markets.
| Name of Innovation | Austria Position | Germany Position | Spain Position | Switzerland Position | UK Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data journalism | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Collaborative/Investigative | 1 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 3 |
| Engagement (data) | 16 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 |
| Social media | 11 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 20 |
| Diversity | 4 | 10 | 15 | 14 | 9 |
| Paywalls/Paid content | 4 | 12 | 8 | 16 | 13 |
| Automation | 11 | 16 | 12 | 7 | 10 |
| New organizational teams | 10 | 12 | 15 | 3 | 19 |
| Storytelling | – | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Citizen participation | 11 | 3 | – | 2 | 8 |
| Mobile journalism | 2 | 15 | 5 | – | 11 |
| Audio/Podcast | 6 | 8 | 7 | 16 | – |
| Remote work | – | 17 | 8 | 14 | 7 |
| Fact-checking | – | 10 | 3 | – | 5 |
| Membership models | – | 8 | 6 | – | 16 |
| Newsletter | 14 | – | 8 | 18 | – |
| Media labs | 16 | – | 15 | – | 16 |
| Crowdfunding | 20 | 17 | – | 19 | – |
| Journalism start-ups | 7 | – | – | 1 | – |
| Local journalism | – | – | – | 10 | 5 |
| Constructive journalism | – | 7 | – | – | 12 |
| Foundation funding | – | – | 12 | – | 14 |
| Para-journalism | – | – | 11 | 11 | – |
| Science journalism | – | 12 | 15 | – | – |
| Niche media | – | – | – | 19 | 14 |
| Other financing models | – | 19 | – | – | 16 |
| Targeting | – | – | – | 5 | – |
| Quality management | – | – | – | 11 | – |
| Tools discourse quality | 8 | – | – | – | – |
| Personal/Digital meetings | 9 | – | – | – | – |
| News only TV channel | 14 | – | – | – | – |
| Video by print media | 16 | – | – | – | – |
| Corporate culture | – | 19 | – | – | – |
| Entrepreneurial journalism | 19 | – | – | – | – |
| Branded content | – | – | 20 | – | – |
Source: Authors’ own research.
Reference
- Meier, Klaus, Jonas Schützeneder, José Alberto García Avilés, José María Valero-Pastor, Andy Kaltenbrunner, Renée Lugschitz, Colin Porlezza, Giulia Ferri, Vinzenz Wyss, and Mirco Saner. 2022. Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media 3: 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).