Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Different Irrigation Water Salinity Levels on Nutrients Uptake, Biochemical Content and Growth Response of Blue Panicum, Quinoa and Silage Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Quantification of Pinus pinea L. Pinecone Productivity Using Machine Learning of UAV and Field Images
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Phenotypic Evaluation of Recombinant Inbred Lines for Sodicity Tolerance at Reproductive Stage in Rice †

by
Ashish Nain
1,2,
Saraswathipura L. Krishnamurthy
1,*,
Parbodh C. Sharma
1,*,
Bayragondlu M. Lokeshkumar
1,
Mukesh Kumar
2 and
Arvinder S. Warraich
1
1
Division of Crop Improvement, ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India
2
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 122004, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Laayoune Forum on Biosaline Agriculture, 14–16 June 2022; Available online: https://lafoba2.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 16(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016047
Published: 16 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Laayoune Forum on Biosaline Agriculture)

Abstract

:
Salt stress is the most widespread soil problem in rice-growing countries, and it causes significant reductions in rice production worldwide. Identifying QTLs for sodicity tolerance at the reproductive stage is crucial to enhance the grain yield in sodic stress ecology. From this perspective, we developed recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from MTU 1001/Kalarata. A set of 176 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) was evaluated, along with the tolerant parent Kalarata and the sensitive parent MTU 1001, in a controlled microplot with a sodicity of pH ~ 9.5 at ICAR - Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (CSSRI), Karnal. The lines RIL34 (13.1 g/plant), RIL83 (12.7 g/plant), RIL40 (11 g/plant), RIL41 (10.2 g/plant), and RIL124 (10.1 g/plant) were top yielders. The yield-contributing traits, namely, plant height (cm), panicle length (cm), total tiller, productive tiller, biological weight (g/plant), and spikelet fertility (%), were highly affected in sodic stress conditions. The tolerant lines RIL34, RIL83, RIL40, RIL41, and RIL124 could be used for breeding programs and further studies to dissect the molecular and physiological mechanisms of reproductive stage sodic stress tolerance in rice.

1. Introduction

Rice is a diploid (2n = 2x = 24) cereal crop, which serves as a primary staple food for more than 3.5 billion people in the world, and it is cultivated in more than 114 countries. In developing countries, an exploding population with urbanization and a decrease in cultivable lands are threatening food security. Therefore, achieving food security is of global concern. To meet the food demand, we must increase global rice production by at least 70% to feed the projected number of 9.6 billion people by 2050 [1]; however, at that time, India will have a population size of around 162 million, which will require about 136 mt of rice [2]. Recently, the agricultural sector has been facing various emerging problems of biotic and abiotic stresses. Abiotic stresses, such as drought, temperature, and salinity, seriously affect rice yield to a great extent. Among these, salt stress (both salinity and alkalinity) is the most predominant soil problem in rice-cultivating countries in the world, and it is a serious threat to increasing rice production worldwide [3]. Salt-affected soil has been reported in more than 100 countries, and it is estimated that, out of around one billion hectares of land worldwide, around 580 mha is facing the problem of alkalinity [4]. In India, the total salt-affected area has been estimated to be 6.73 million hectares, of which 2.97 million hectares is saline, whereas 3.77 million hectares is affected by alkaline soils. Rice is a salt-sensitive crop, and exposure to salt stress has serious negative effects on its vegetative growth and grain yield. The effects of salt stress on the morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits of rice have been reported. Salt stress has been found to significantly reduce grain yield by affecting tillering, spikelet filling, plant height, biomass production, and 1000 grain weight [5,6,7]. Therefore, the development of salt tolerance during the reproductive stage is the only option left for the efficient management of salt-affected soils. Alkalinity tolerance in rice is a complex trait that makes the screening of phenotypes under field conditions very difficult. Furthermore, to improve alkalinity tolerance in rice, it is very important to find sufficient genetic variation and to formulate suitable screening techniques that are reliable and able to identify alkaline-tolerant genotypes [8]. Grain yield is a complex trait, and it is influenced by various genetic and environmental factors. To improve grain yield, an evaluation of breeding lines is the most important step to select the superior genotype. From this perspective, the present investigation was carried out to evaluate an RIL population and to study the association between grain yield and important yield-contributing traits in rice under alkaline conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

A population of 176 recombinant inbred lines (RILs, F7 generation) derived from a cross between MTU1001 (alkaline sensitive) and Kalarata (alkaline tolerant) was evaluated for alkalinity tolerance at the reproductive stage in alkaline soil microplots (6 × 3 m) at a facility at ICAR-CSSRI, Karnal. A complete set of the RIL population, along with parents, was raised in normal field conditions in a nursery with the recommended package of practices. Thirty-day-old seedlings were transplanted into alkaline microplots (pH ~ 9.5) in a randomized complete block design with two replications. Before transplanting plant material, pH2 of microplots was measured by dissolving one part of soil in two parts of distilled water. Each genotype was planted in a single row of 3.0 m length following a row x plant spacing of 20 × 15 cm. One month after transplanting, at the maximum tillering stage, alkaline stress was imposed by irrigating alkaline water created using sodium bicarbonate. Subsequently, the pH of the microplots was recorded weekly and maintained at around pH~9.5 throughout the cropping season up to maturity. Morphological data were recorded as per the standard evaluation system of rice [9]. The data were recorded from 5 randomly labeled plants from each RIL, parent, and check. Morphological characteristics were days to 50% flowering, salt injury score, plant height (cm), panicle length (cm), total tillers per plant, productive tiller per plant, spikelet fertility (%), 1000 grain weight (g), biomass/plant (g), grain yield/plant (g), and harvest index (%). The salt injury score was recorded based on visual symptoms following the IRRI-modified standard evaluation system (SES) for rice, with a score of “1” meaning highly tolerant and a score of “9” meaning highly sensitive [9]. The phenotypic data were used to estimate ANOVA, histograms, and correlations among yield-contributing traits. All the analyses and diagrammatic visualization of data were carried out using the variability package of R program.

3. Results and Discussion

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out for all morphological parameters, and it was found that the genotypic mean sum of square was highly significant, indicating variation within genotypes. There were prominent differences in the responses of rice plants to alkaline stress at the reproductive stage. The alkaline injury score was recorded after forty days of stress, and it was found that 67, 73, 30, and 12 genotypes exhibited tolerant, moderate tolerant, sensitive, and highly sensitive reactions with salt injury scores of 3, 5, 7, and 9, respectively, in response to stress (Figure 1). Sensitive RILs scoring 9 died without producing any grain yield. The classification was carried out based on their phenotypic performances in all measurements, including plant height, panicle length, tiller number, and biological surveys, of which the alkaline injury score and survivability were conclusive parameters. Grain yield per plant (g) was the trait most affected by alkalinity. The reductions in plant growth, and grain yield and its contributing traits that take place under alkaline stress occur through osmotic effects, which reduce a plant’s ability to absorb water and cause reduced growth [10,11].
At the reproductive stage, RIL 19 (145.5 cm) had the highest plant height, and the lowest value was found in RIL 165 (31.43 cm); the plant height ranged from 31.43 to 145.5 cm. The highest panicle length was recorded in RIL 32 (26.6 cm), while no panicle was produced by highly sensitive RILs. The total number of tillers was recorded to be the highest in RIL 170 (11) and the lowest in RIL 9 (2) however, the highest productive tillers per plant was observed in RIL 170 (10), and no productive tillers were found in RIL 132, RIL 162, RIL 163, RIL164, RIL 165, or RIL 169. The highest spikelet fertility (%) was observed in RIL 68 (95.57%), while the lowest spikelet fertility (%) was observed in RIL 161 (8.51). The maximum biomass per plant (g) was observed in RIL 57 (34.5 g), while the minimum biomass was observed in RIL 162 (3.33 g). The range of grain yield per plant (g/plant) was 0 in RILs with salt injury score 9 to 13.1 g for RIL 34 in alkaline stress. The lines RIL34 (13.1 g/plant), RIL83 (12.7 g/plant), RIL40 (11 g/plant), RIL41 (10.2 g/plant), and RIL124 (10.1 g/plant) showed the significantly highest grain yields amongst all the RILs evaluated in alkaline stress conditions. The top yielding recombinant inbred lines showed the highest biomass production, spikelet fertility, test weight, and productive tillers. The RILs recorded with the highest performance under sodic stress are the most likely to perform well in saline stress as reported by [7].
These results are in agreement with the findings of [10,12] in rice. Histograms of the distribution of frequency of the most affected traits, i.e., spikelet fertility (%) and grain yield per plant (g), are depicted in Figure 2.
A positive correlation between two traits permits simultaneous improvement in both the traits while confining selection to any one of the associated traits [10]. Grain yield per plant showed a significant positive association with days to 50% flowering (0.24), plant height (0.73), panicle length (0.64), total tillers per plant (0.36), productive tillers per plant (0.63), test weight (0.6), spikelet fertility (0.7), biological yield per plant (0.87), and harvest index (0.75), while it showed a significant negative correlation with the alkaline injury score (0.84) (Figure 3). Similar findings were previously reported by [10,13].

4. Conclusions

In this study, positive correlations were found between grain yield and its contributing traits, which may be useful as selection criteria for the improvement of grain yield in alkaline stress conditions. The tolerant lines RIL34, RIL83, RIL40, RIL41, and RIL124 could be used for breeding programs and further studies of the molecular and physiological mechanisms of sodic stress tolerance in rice at the reproductive stage. The findings of this study may help to simplify the breeding of salinity tolerance in rice in order to adapt to climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.K. and P.C.S.; methodology, A.N., S.L.K., B.M.L. and A.S.W.; software, A.N. and A.S.W.; validation, S.L.K. and P.C.S..; formal analysis, S.L.K. and B.M.L.; resources, P.C.S. and S.L.K.; data curation, A.N., S.L.K. and B.M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N.; writing—review and editing, S.L.K., P.C.S., B.M.L. and M.K.; visualization, S.L.K., B.M.L. and M.K.; supervision, S.L.K. and P.C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Director of the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute for completing the research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Godfray, H.C.; Beddington, J.R.; Crute, I.R.; Haddad, L.; Lawrence, D.; Muir, J.F.; Pretty, J.; Robinson, S.; Thomas, S.M.; Toulmin, C. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 2010, 327, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. IIRR, 2015; Vision 2050. ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research: Hyderabad, India, 2015; p. 2.
  3. Hoang, T.; Tran, T.; Nguyen, T.; Williams, B.; Wurm, P.; Bellairs, S.; Mundree, S. Improvement of salinity stress tolerance in rice: Challenges and opportunities. Agronomy 2016, 6, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. FAO and ITPS. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR)—Main Report; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils: Rome, Italy, 2015.
  5. Morales, S.G.; Trejo-Téllez, L.I.; Gómez Merino, F.C.; Caldana, C.; Espinosa-Victoria, D.; Herrera Cabrera, B.E. Growth, photosynthetic activity, and potassium and sodium concentration in rice plants under salt stress. Acta Scientiarum. Agron. 2012, 34, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. De Leon, T.B.; Linscombe, S.; Gregorio, G.; Subudhi, P.K. Genetic variation in southern USA rice genotypes for seedling salinity tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Krishnamurthy, S.L.; Gautam, R.K.; Sharma, P.C.; Sharma, D.K. Effect of different salt stresses on agro-morphological traits and utilisation of salt stress indices for reproductive stage salt tolerance in Rice. Field Crops Res. 2016, 190, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kranto, S.; Chankaew, S.; Monkham, T. Theerakulpisut, P.; Sanitchon, J. Evaluation for salt tolerance in rice using multiple screening methods. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016, 18, 1921–1931. [Google Scholar]
  9. IRRI (2014); Standard Evaluation System for Rice. 5th ed. International Rice Research Institute: Los Banos, The Philippines.
  10. Krishnamurthy, S.L.; Sharma, S.K.; Gautam, R.K.; Kumar, V. Path and association analysis and stress indices for salinity tolerance traits in promising rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes. Cereal Res. Commun. 2014, 42, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.; Wu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yang, C.; Shi, D. Effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth and ion balance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil Environ. 2011, 57, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chakraborty, S.; Das, P.K.; Guha, B.; Sarmah, K.K.; Barman, B. Quantitative genetic analysis for yield and yield components in Boro Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Not. Sci. Biol. 2010, 2, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sanghera, G.S.; Kashyap, S.C. Genetic parameters and selection indices in F3 progenies of hill rice genotypes. Not. Sci. Biol. 2012, 4, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Response of RIL population in alkaline stress conditions.
Figure 1. Response of RIL population in alkaline stress conditions.
Environsciproc 16 00047 g001
Figure 2. Histograms of distribution of RIL population for grain yield per plant (g) and spikelet fertility (%).
Figure 2. Histograms of distribution of RIL population for grain yield per plant (g) and spikelet fertility (%).
Environsciproc 16 00047 g002
Figure 3. Correlations among morphological traits under alkaline conditions.
Figure 3. Correlations among morphological traits under alkaline conditions.
Environsciproc 16 00047 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nain, A.; Krishnamurthy, S.L.; Sharma, P.C.; Lokeshkumar, B.M.; Kumar, M.; Warraich, A.S. Phenotypic Evaluation of Recombinant Inbred Lines for Sodicity Tolerance at Reproductive Stage in Rice. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 16, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016047

AMA Style

Nain A, Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma PC, Lokeshkumar BM, Kumar M, Warraich AS. Phenotypic Evaluation of Recombinant Inbred Lines for Sodicity Tolerance at Reproductive Stage in Rice. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 16(1):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nain, Ashish, Saraswathipura L. Krishnamurthy, Parbodh C. Sharma, Bayragondlu M. Lokeshkumar, Mukesh Kumar, and Arvinder S. Warraich. 2022. "Phenotypic Evaluation of Recombinant Inbred Lines for Sodicity Tolerance at Reproductive Stage in Rice" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 16, no. 1: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016047

APA Style

Nain, A., Krishnamurthy, S. L., Sharma, P. C., Lokeshkumar, B. M., Kumar, M., & Warraich, A. S. (2022). Phenotypic Evaluation of Recombinant Inbred Lines for Sodicity Tolerance at Reproductive Stage in Rice. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 16(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop