Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Participation Facets of Environmental Citizen Science Initiatives: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Provocateur—Questioning the Status Quo
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Analysis of Nano Silica Aerogel Based Glazing Effect on the Solar Heat Gain and Cooling Load in a School under Different Climatic Conditions †

1
Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06100 Perugia, Italy
2
Department of Art and Architecture, Rouzbahan University, Mazandaran 1133701701, Iran
3
Department of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University of Shiraz, Shiraz 7136410041, Iran
4
School of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts, Design, and Architecture, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd Built Environment Research Forum, Sydney, Australia, 1 December 2021.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 12(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012015
Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd Built Environment Research Forum)

Abstract

:
Demand for energy-efficient school buildings, which form a major part of public buildings, is growing in Iran. Window insulation is required to reduce the amount of energy wasted through openings. This study investigates the effect of double-glazing with aerogel insulation compared to a 3 mm glazing pane and a double-glazing window in terms of solar gain and cooling load. The case studies are primary schools in Yazd (hot-dry climate), Bushehr (hot-humid climate), and Zanjan (cold climate). Numerical simulations of a two-story school are performed to calculate solar gain and cooling load. The use of the aerogel glazing system in Yazd resulted in a reduction of 73% of the solar gain and about 33% of cooling loads compared to a simple glazing window; if compared to a double-glazing standard window, the reductions are of about 56% and 16%, respectively for solar gains and cooling consumptions. Also, the use of aerogel glazing in Bushehr allows a reduction of about 64% in terms of solar gain and 27% for cooling when compared to simple glazing. By using the aerogel in Zanjan school the solar gain decreased by about 62% and cooling loads of about 22% when compared to a single layer of glazing.

1. Introduction

The average energy consumption in school buildings in Iran, as a major category of public buildings, is more than 160 kWh/m2 [1], which is 2.5 times more than the energy consumed in high-performance schools in developed countries, which is approximately 65 kWh/m2 [2].
Regarding energy balance, windows can either decrease or increase the energy loads of a building through solar heat gains or conduction heat losses, respectively [3]. To achieve the highest possible thermal resistance, new insulation materials and solutions with low thermal conductivity values are proposed in the present paper [4]. Among insulation materials, aerogel may be a very interesting solution to be used in highly energy-efficient windows. It is a solid material with a conductivity of about 0.015 W/m2K, very low in comparison with common materials for insulation [5]. It has great potential in the window and glazing industry and its use has increased the thermal resistance of these elements [6,7,8].
This study aims to investigate the effect of using insulation in comparison with ordinary and double-glazed glass in hot-humid, hot-dry, and cold climates of Iran’s schools in terms of solar gain and cooling load.

2. Methodology

In order to compare the performance of aerogel glazing in educational buildings, a two story-story building is selected as a case study (Figure 1). The building has 15.20 m by 35.90 m (area of 545.68 m2) dimensions; the east-west extension is 545.68 m2 per floor, height is 3.5 m, the window-to-wall ratio (WWR) is 30%, the occupancy is 20 people/m2, the target illuminance is 400 lux. The buildings and windows features are given in Table 1 and Table 2. The modeled building corresponds to a representative elementary school in almost all cities of Iran. DesignBuilder 6.1.7.007 software, which is based on the computation Energy Analysis Engine Plus 8.9, was used to simulate the energy demand of the building according to the ASHRAE standard [9]. The heating and cooling design temperatures were set at 22 °C and 24 °C, respectively.

3. Results

The period of the simulation is one year and the office hours of active work in a building were considered. The amount of internal heat load in office spaces and the minimum required level of lighting are stated. These values are the same in all simulation models and the only variable was the transparent solution. After performing the simulations, the solar gain and the cooling load for the studied cities are calculated for one year (Figure 2).
Figure 2a shows the annual solar gains; simple glazing has the highest and aerogel has the lowest solar gain for the three investigated cities. It should be noted that the largest decrease in solar gain is related to Yazd (hot-dry climate). According to Figure 2b, the cooling load of the building with aerogel is less than simple and double-glazed windows. In particular, the use of aerogel has the highest cooling load reduction in Yazd (hot-dry climate), where the solar gain reduction is about 73% and 56% with respect to single and double-glazing, respectively. In Bushehr (hot-humid climate), aerogel shows good performance and decreases the solar gain by around 64% and for cooling loads by about 27%. The use of aerogel in Zanjan (cold climate) produces a reduction of 62% in terms of solar gain, not so different compared to Bushehr. Results are in line with literature data [6,7].

4. Conclusions

In this preliminary study, the effect of aerogel double-glazing system integrated in the envelope of a school building in terms of solar heat gain and building cooling loads is investigated in Yazd (hot-dry climate), Bushehr (hot-humid climate), and Zanjan (cold climate). Simulations are carried out by DesignBuilder and the resulting values of annual solar gain and cooling load of the building with aerogel are compared with those of a single-glazing layer and double-glazing solution. Results shows that aerogel outperforms the single and double-glazing configurations under the three investigated climatic conditions for cooling load reduction. The summary of the results is as follows:
  • aerogel double-glazing system could be considered a good solution in terms of annual energy demand reduction with respect to simple glazing, under hot-dry climates (Yazd). The use of aerogel in Yazd has the highest decrease in solar gain (73% and 56% of reduction compared with single and double-glazing systems, respectively) and cooling load (33% and 16% of reduction compared with single and double-glazing systems, respectively) among the three investigated cities;
  • in Bushehr, the solar gain is reduced by aerogel and double-glazing of about 64% and 26% respectively, compared to the simple-glazing layer; by reducing the U-value and SHGC the aerogel configuration is able to reduce solar gain and hence cooling load;
  • in Zanjan, the solar gain is reduced by aerogel by 62% compared to a single-glazing pane. Also, the difference between aerogel and double-glazing systems in solar gain reduction is 39%. The use of a double-glazing solution reduces the cooling load by 18% with respect to the single-glazing pane, which is about 5% less than the aerogel.
It is important to highlight that the effect of aerogel glazing solutions with respect to standard glazings is not so different in the three simulated climatic conditions because the WWR is low (30%). Therefore, in future developments of this study, the analysis of other school buildings with a higher percentage of glazing surfaces (50-60%) will be performed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B. and M.M.; methodology, C.B. and M.M.; software, M.M.; validation, E.B., F.M. and S.N.S.; formal analysis, E.B., F.M. and G.P.; investigation, E.B., F.M. and G.P.; data curation, M.M. and G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, C.B., E.B., F.M., M.M. and G.P.; visualization, M.M. and G.P.; supervision, C.B. and G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to thank UNSW and the School of Built Environment for organizing the Built Environment Research Forum and the reviewers for the provided feedback.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iranian Fuel Conservation Organization. Modification of Energy Consumption Patterns in Schools and Offices; Iranian Fuel Conservation Organization: Tehran, Iran, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Im, P.; Haberl, J. A survey of high-performance schools. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates, Orlando, FL, USA, 24–26 July 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ihm, P.; Park, L.; Kararti, M.; Seo, D. Impact of window selection on the energy performance of residential buildings in South Korea. Energy Policy 2012, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. McKinsey & Company. Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve; McKinsey & Company: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang, L. Feasibility Study of Using Silica Aerogel as Insulation for Buildings. Master’s Thesis, KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Stockholm Sweden, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Buratti, C.; Belloni, E.; Merli, F.; Zinzi, M. Aerogel glazing systems for building applications: A review. Energy Build. 2021, 231, 110587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sadineni, S.B.; Madala, S.; Boehm, R.F. Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3617–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jelle, B.P.; Hynd, A.; Gustavsen, A.; Arasteh, D.; Goudey, H.; Hart, R. Fenestration of today and tomorrow: A state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 96, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shaeri, J.; Yaghoubi, M.; Aliabedi, M.; Vakilinazhad, R. analysis of using nano aerogel glazing on solar heat gain and cooling load in an office at hot and dry, hot and humid, and cold climates of Iran. J. Solid Fluid Mech. 2018, 7, 209–221. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. School building floor plans: (a) ground floor, (b) first floor.
Figure 1. School building floor plans: (a) ground floor, (b) first floor.
Environsciproc 12 00015 g001
Figure 2. Simulated results for school buildings in Yazd, Bushehr, and Zanjan: (a) total solar gain for the investigated window configurations; (b) cooling load reduction of double-glazing and aerogel configurations compare to the single-glazing pane.
Figure 2. Simulated results for school buildings in Yazd, Bushehr, and Zanjan: (a) total solar gain for the investigated window configurations; (b) cooling load reduction of double-glazing and aerogel configurations compare to the single-glazing pane.
Environsciproc 12 00015 g002
Table 1. Layers constituting single, double-glazing, and aerogel double-glazing systems and their Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) (adimensional and equivalent to g-value) and U-values (W/m2K) according to the EnergyPlus library taken from the ASHRAE standard [9].
Table 1. Layers constituting single, double-glazing, and aerogel double-glazing systems and their Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) (adimensional and equivalent to g-value) and U-values (W/m2K) according to the EnergyPlus library taken from the ASHRAE standard [9].
Single-Glazing PaneDouble-Glazing SystemAerogel Glazing System
Environsciproc 12 00015 i001 Environsciproc 12 00015 i002 Environsciproc 12 00015 i003
SHGC = 0.74–0.87
U-value = 5.829 W/m2K
SHGC = 0.64–0.77
U-value = 2.976 W/m2K
SHGC = 0.35
U-value = 0.927 W/m2K
Table 2. Specifications of the materials selected to model the building in DesignBuilder software.
Table 2. Specifications of the materials selected to model the building in DesignBuilder software.
MaterialThickness
[mm]
Cross SectionU-Value [W/(m2K)]Rc-Value
[(m2K)/W]
External wallBrickwork100 Environsciproc 12 00015 i0040.3652.741
Expanded polystyrene80
Concrete block200
Gypsum plasterboard15
Internal wallGypsum plasterboard25 Environsciproc 12 00015 i0051.7160.583
Concrete block200
Gypsum plasterboard25
CeilingFloor screed10 Environsciproc 12 00015 i0061.40.71
Cast concrete300
Expanded polystyrene200
Ceiling tiles100
RoofAsphalt5 Environsciproc 12 00015 i0070.7661.305
Expanded polystyrene40
Concrete300
Gypsum plasterboard15
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buratti, C.; Belloni, E.; Merli, F.; Mastoori, M.; Sharifi, S.N.; Pignatta, G. Analysis of Nano Silica Aerogel Based Glazing Effect on the Solar Heat Gain and Cooling Load in a School under Different Climatic Conditions. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 12, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012015

AMA Style

Buratti C, Belloni E, Merli F, Mastoori M, Sharifi SN, Pignatta G. Analysis of Nano Silica Aerogel Based Glazing Effect on the Solar Heat Gain and Cooling Load in a School under Different Climatic Conditions. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 12(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buratti, Cinzia, Elisa Belloni, Francesca Merli, Mehrangiz Mastoori, Seyede Najme Sharifi, and Gloria Pignatta. 2021. "Analysis of Nano Silica Aerogel Based Glazing Effect on the Solar Heat Gain and Cooling Load in a School under Different Climatic Conditions" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 12, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop