Next Article in Journal
A Novel Low-Cost Mechanism for Energy Generation through Footsteps
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Approach to Estimate Energy Consumption of Reverse Osmosis and forward Osmosis Membrane Separation Processes for Seawater Desalination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Parametric Optimization of High-Dielectric Organic Thin-Film Solar Cells †

by
Muhammad Raheel Khan
* and
Bożena Jarząbek
*
Centre of Polymer and Carbon Materials, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sklodowska Curie 34 Str., 41-819 Zabrze, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 6th Conference on Emerging Materials and Processes (CEMP 2023), Islamabad, Pakistan, 22–23 November 2023.
Mater. Proc. 2024, 17(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024017016
Published: 12 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of CEMP 2023)

Abstract

:
Organic solar cells (OSCs) have the potential to generate electricity under sunlight at a low cost. In this study, the influence of active layer thickness, defect density, temperature and the presence of reflective coating is studied for the structure ITO/PTAA/PBDB-T: ITIC-OE/PDINO/Ag, by applying PTAA as a hole transport layer (HTL), while the blend of PBDB-T: ITIC-OE is used as an active layer and PDINO is applied as electron transport layer (ETL), respectively. Solar capacitance simulator one-dimensional (SCAPS—1D) software is used to optimize different parameters, which affect the performance of OSCs. By introducing backside reflective coating, the efficiency increases by 2.5%. In the future, this study can be used for the power conversion efficiency (PCE) enhancement of OSCs.

1. Introduction

Organic solar cells (OSCs) have shown promising improvement in the last few years [1]. Fullerene acceptors (FAs) have morphological instabilities that are overcome by non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs), making them a promising choice for high-efficiency OSCs [2,3,4,5,6]. PEDOT: PSS is widely used as a hole transport layer (HTL) in conventional OSCs due to improved transparency, high work function and high conductivity [1,7]. However, PEDOT: PSS is acidic in nature and its effectiveness at collecting holes remains uncertain [8,9]. To enhance charge transport towards the respective electrode in OSC devices and minimize charge recombination, numerous alternative HTL materials have been investigated [10,11,12].
FAs have good characteristics, i.e., high electron mobility at room temperature such as 0.1 cm2/Vs [13,14]; however, their stability is low and has high synthetic cost [2]. The main advantages of NFAs as compared to FAs are their low voltage losses, low production cost and high efficiency [2].
Besides practical work, simulation study is also important. Numerous simulation works have been presented using SCAPS—1D software. The authors of [14] presented a simulation work on the enhancement of the performance of NFA OSCs using several types of HTL materials. The highest efficiency is achieved for WS2 (23.55%), MoS2 (20.05%) and GO (15.89%). Nithya et al. [1] presented a simulation study on PBDB-T: ITIC, (NFA) OSC using copper iodide (CuI) instead of PEDOT: PSS. The simulation results demonstrated that the output performance of NFA based OSCs can be improved using CuI. The PCE of the proposed solar cell is reported as 15.68%.
Our previous work [15] was about the optimization and PCE enhancement of modified polymer solar cells using spiro OMeTAD under the 90% reflection coating and the PCE achieved was 9.40%. In this study, we modeled modified NFA-BHJ OSCs using PTAA as a hole transport layer (HTL); meanwhile, PDINO was employed as an electron transport layer (ETL) to optimize its technological parameters such as active layer thickness, defect density, and temperature, and its efficiency was increased by introducing 50% reflective coating. Modified ITIC-OE is a modified acceptor which is introduced by [16]. To our knowledge, so far, no studies have been conducted using PTAA as an HTL and by applying backside reflective coating to increase the PCE of high-dielectric OSCs.

2. Methodology Approach

SCAPS—1D Software and Simulation Parameters

Numerous software programs are available, such as SCAPS, WAMPS, COMSOL and SILVACO, to investigate solar cell performance parameters. In this study, SCAPS simulation 1D software is used to determine the output performance of proposed high-dielectric OSCs. SCAPS-1D software was developed by Ghent University Belgium, department of EISs (Electronics and Information Systems) [17]. SCAPS—1D software works based on the Poisson, continuity and transport equations.
Organic solar cells are composed of an anode, cathode, active layer, ETL and HTL. In our investigated structure, Poly[(2,6-(4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene))-alt-(5,5-(1′,3′-di-2-thienyl-5′,7′-bis(2-ethylhexyl)benzo[1′,2′-c:4′,5′-c′]dithiophene-4,8-dione))]:(3,9-bis(2-methylene-(3-(1,1-dicyanomethylene)-indanone)-5,5,11,11-tetraki (4-hexylphenyl)-dithieno [2,3-d:2,3-d]-s-indaceno [1,2-b:5,6-b]dithiophene)) with oligoethylene, PBDB-T: ITIC-OE is used as the active layer (an active layer is the blend of donor and acceptor materials). Poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA) is used as an HTL, and its purpose is to collect holes from the active layer while N,N′-Bis(N,N-dimethylpropan-1-amine oxide)perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic diimide (PDINO) is applied as an ETL with the function of collecting electrons from the active layer. ITO and Ag are used as the anode and cathode, respectively. The proposed OSC is shown in Figure 1. To calculate the output performance of an OSC, the following input parameters are required for simulation, which are shown in Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

The active layer plays a vital role in determining the device’s performance. Based on a previous research study, it was observed that the thickness of the active layer had an impact on photovoltaic characteristics such as Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE. In this study, the thickness of HTL varied up to 40 nm. However, HTL thickness has a minor impact on the performance of the proposed OSC. After HTL optimization, the thickness of the active layer is adjusted up to 70 nm to observe its effect on the OSC performance. From the simulation study, it is observed that by increasing the thickness of the active layer, the Voc and FF decrease while the Jsc and PCE increase, which is illustrated in Figure 2a,b and Figure 2c,d, respectively. The decrease in Voc is due to defects and traps in the active layer or the fact that charge carriers have to cover a longer distance, which increases resistance. The reduction in FF is due to an increase in series resistance because it causes a voltage drop across the solar cell when a current flows through it. This voltage drop decreases the output voltage, which reduces the maximum power that the solar cell can generate. However, despite these reductions in FF and Voc, Jsc and PCE increase due to improved light absorption and the generation of photo-generated carriers.
In general, polymers often contain defects that can trap charge carriers and affect the quality of the active layer. Here in this investigated structure, the defect density (Nt) of the active layer is changed from 1010 (1/cm3) to 1013 (1/cm3) to observe the effect of defect density on the active layer. It is analyzed that as the defect density increases, the lifetime (τn) and diffusion length (Ln) of charge carriers decreases, as shown in Table 2. The defect density acts as a recombination site because it introduces energy levels within the band gap of the material. These energy levels can trap charge carriers (electrons and holes), which facilitate their recombination and can reduce the output performance of solar cells. When the defect density (Nt) increases, the Jsc and PCE decrease, as illustrated in Figure 3a,b.
Solar cells are exposed to higher temperatures when placed outside the door. So, it is essential to check the performance of the solar cells at high temperatures. In real weather conditions, the temperature may reach 400 K. So, in this simulation study, the temperature was varied from 300 to 400 K. From the simulation study, it is observed that variation in temperature affects the performance of OSCs, as illustrated in Figure 4a,b. The results of the simulation study indicate that as temperature increases, both the Voc and PCE decrease. The decline in Voc can be attributed to the increase in reverse saturation current density. At higher temperatures, electrons are excited due to the instability of the band gap, and the charge carrier recombination increases, which reduces the PCE.
Reflective coatings play a key role in enhancing the PCE of OSCs. Typically, these coatings are applied on the back side of the solar cell with the primary function being the redirection of unabsorbed light back through the solar cell [22]. This process significantly increases the light path within the cell. As a result of this extended light path, unabsorbed photons can interact with the active layer, thereby increasing the chances of the electron-hole generation process and enhancing the overall photocurrent. In this simulation study, the backside reflective coating is altered from 10% to 50% to study its effect on OSC parameters. Figure 5a,b demonstrates that through the addition of reflective coating, the Jsc and PCE improved.

4. Parametric Optimization and Comparative Analysis with Experimental Results

The optimized parameters for the proposed OSC are shown in Table 3. The simulated results are compared with the experimental results (ITO/PEDOT: PSS/PBDB-T: ITIC-OE/PFN-Br/Ag), which is performed for the same active layer [16]. From the simulation results, it is observed that simulation results are in close agreement with experimental results. The experimental and simulated results are shown in Table 4.

5. Conclusions

In this simulation study, an OSC (ITO/PTAA/PBDB-T: ITIC-OE/PDINO/Ag) is simulated and its PCE is enhanced by optimizing the parameters such as the thickness of the active layer and HTL, the defect density of the active layer and temperature; PCE is also enhanced through backside reflective coating. From the simulation study, it is observed that HTL layer thickness has little impact on the photovoltaic parameters, so the HTL thickness is optimized up to 40 nm. Active layer thickness is changed up to 70 nm; it is observed that by increasing the thickness of the active layer, the output performance parameters such as Voc and FF decrease while Jsc and PCE increase. The decrease in Voc may be due to defects and traps in the active layer, while FF decreases due to an increase in series resistance. The increases in PCE and Jsc are observed due to the improved light absorption. The active layer defect density affects the performance of the OSC. It is observed that as the defect density increases, the performance parameters of solar cells decrease. The optimized value of the defect density is 1 × 1013; below this value, the performance of an OSC is improved but it is difficult to design such a type of solar cell with low defects. Temperature has an impact on the performance of solar cells. The ideal temperature for solar cell operation is 300 K. So, a simulation study was performed for 300 to 400 K temperature. It was observed that by increasing the temperature, the performance parameters decreased. Backside reflective coating is a technique used to enhance the Jsc and PCE of OSCs. The reflective coating value was changed from 10% to 50%. Due to reflective coating, the absorption capacity and optical path length were enhanced, which improved the PCE. The simulated results are compared with the experimental results, which are available in the literature. These simulation results are in close agreement with practical results and this software can be used for the performance enhancement of OSCs.

Author Contributions

M.R.K.—conceptualization, methodology and writing—original draft; B.J.—conceptualization, supervision and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nithya, K.S.; Sudheer, K.S. Device Modelling of Non-Fullerene Organic Solar Cell with Inorganic CuI Hole Transport Layer Using SCAPS 1-D. Optik 2020, 217, 164790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gasparini, N.; Wadsworth, A.; Moser, M.; Baran, D.; McCulloch, I.; Brabec, C.J. The Physics of Small Molecule Acceptors for Efficient and Stable Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. In Advanced Energy Materials; Wiley-VCH Verlag: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, Y.; Zhan, X. Non-Fullerene Acceptors for Organic Photovoltaics: An Emerging Horizon. In Materials Horizons; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2014; pp. 470–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eftaiha, A.F.; Sun, J.P.; Hill, I.G.; Welch, G.C. Recent Advances of Non-Fullerene, Small Molecular Acceptors for Solution Processed Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2014, 2, 1201–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nielsen, C.B.; Holliday, S.; Chen, H.Y.; Cryer, S.J.; McCulloch, I. Non-Fullerene Electron Acceptors for Use in Organic Solar Cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2803–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yao, H.F.; Hou, J.H. Design and application of highly efficient polymers for polymer solar cells. Acta Polym. Sin. 2016, 1468–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, F.; Johansson, M.; Andersson, M.R.; Hummelen, J.C.; Inganäs, O. Polymer Photovoltaic Cells with Conducting Polymer Anodes. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 662–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wong, K.W.; Yip, H.L.; Luo, Y.; Wong, K.Y.; Lau, W.M.; Low, K.H.; Chow, H.F.; Gao, Z.Q.; Yeung, W.L.; Chang, C.C. Blocking Reactions between Indium-Tin Oxide and Poly (3,4-Ethylene Dioxythiophene):Poly(Styrene Sulphonate) with a Self-Assembly Monolayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 2788–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kemerink, M.; Timpanaro, S.; De Kok, M.M.; Meulenkamp, E.A.; Touwslager, F.J. Three-Dimensional Inhomogeneities in PEDOT:PSS Films. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 18820–18825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Levermore, P.A.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.; Das, R.; Bradley, D.D.C. Highly Conductive Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) Films by Vapor Phase Polymerization for Application in Efficient Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2379–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, S.S.; Tu, K.H.; Lin, C.C.; Chen, C.W.; Chhowalla, M. Solution-Processable Graphene Oxide as an Efficient Hole Transport Layer in Polymer Solar Cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3169–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Han, Y.K.; Chang, M.Y.; Ho, K.S.; Hsieh, T.H.; Tsai, J.L.; Huang, P.C. Electrochemically Deposited Nano Polyaniline Films as Hole Transporting Layers in Organic Solar Cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 128, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sit, W.Y.; Eisner, F.D.; Lin, Y.H.; Firdaus, Y.; Seitkhan, A.; Balawi, A.H.; Laquai, F.; Burgess, C.H.; McLachlan, M.A.; Volonakis, G.; et al. High-Efficiency Fullerene Solar Cells Enabled by a Spontaneously Formed Mesostructured CuSCN-Nanowire Heterointerface. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Widianto, E.; Firdaus, Y.; Shobih; Pranoto, L.M.; Triyana, K.; Santoso, I.; Nursam, N.M. Device Modeling of Two-Dimensional Hole Transport Materials for Boosting the Performance of Non-Fullerene Acceptor Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. Opt. Mater. 2022, 132, 112771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, M.R.; Jarząbek, B. Optimization and Efficiency Enhancement of Modified Polymer Solar Cells. Polymers 2023, 15, 3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, X.; Xie, B.; Duan, C.; Wang, Z.; Fan, B.; Zhang, K.; Lin, B.; Colberts, F.J.M.; Ma, W.; Janssen, R.A.J.; et al. A High Dielectric Constant Non-Fullerene Acceptor for Efficient Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2018, 6, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burgelman, M.; Nollet, P.; Degrave, S. Modelling Polycrystalline Semiconductor Solar Cells. Thin Solid Film. 2000, 361, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salem, M.S.; Shaker, A.; Salah, M.M. Device Modeling of Efficient PBDB-T:PZT-Based All-Polymer Solar Cell: Role of Band Alignment. Polymers 2023, 15, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sen, R.; Yadav, M. An Investigation on Organic and Inorganic Materials for Hole Transport Layer in Lead-Free Third-Generation Solar Cell. J. Opt. 2023, 52, 672–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abdelaziz, W.; Zekry, A.; Shaker, A.; Abouelatta, M. Numerical Study of Organic Graded Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cell Using SCAPS Simulation. Sol. Energy 2020, 211, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nithya, K.S.; Sudheer, K.S. Device Modelling and Optimization Studies on Novel ITIC-OE Based Non-Fullerene Organic Solar Cell with Diverse Hole and Electron Transport Layers. Opt. Mater. 2022, 123, 111912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tariq Jan, S.; Noman, M. Influence of Layer Thickness, Defect Density, Doping Concentration, Interface Defects, Work Function, Working Temperature and Reflecting Coating on Lead-Free Perovskite Solar Cell. Sol. Energy 2022, 237, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of proposed OSC.
Figure 1. Structure of proposed OSC.
Materproc 17 00016 g001
Figure 2. Active layer thickness as a function of (a) Voc; (b) FF; (c) Jsc and (d) PCE.
Figure 2. Active layer thickness as a function of (a) Voc; (b) FF; (c) Jsc and (d) PCE.
Materproc 17 00016 g002aMaterproc 17 00016 g002b
Figure 3. Effect of defect density on (a) Jsc and (b) PCE.
Figure 3. Effect of defect density on (a) Jsc and (b) PCE.
Materproc 17 00016 g003
Figure 4. Effect of temperature on (a) Voc and (b) PCE.
Figure 4. Effect of temperature on (a) Voc and (b) PCE.
Materproc 17 00016 g004
Figure 5. Effect of reflection coating on (a) Jsc and (b) PCE.
Figure 5. Effect of reflection coating on (a) Jsc and (b) PCE.
Materproc 17 00016 g005
Table 1. Input parameters for simulation.
Table 1. Input parameters for simulation.
ParametersHTL
[18,19]
ETL
[20]
Active Layer
[16,21]
Thickness, d (nm)405070
Acceptor density, NA (1/cm3)1 × 1017-0
Donor density, ND (1/cm3)-2 × 10210
Band gap, Eg (eV)2.962.981.2
Electron mobility, μn (cm2/Vs)1 × 10−42 × 10−61.2 × 10−5
Hole mobility, μp (cm2/Vs)4 × 10−31 × 10−33.5 × 10−4
Dielectric permittivity, ε956.1
Electron affinity, χ (eV)2.34.114.030
Defect density, Nt (1/cm3)1 × 10141 × 10141 × 1013
Table 2. Variation of defect density for charge carrier diffusion length and lifetime.
Table 2. Variation of defect density for charge carrier diffusion length and lifetime.
Nt (1/cm3)1010101110121013
Ln (nm)5601805618
τn (µs)10,000100010010
Table 3. Optimized parameters of proposed OSC structure.
Table 3. Optimized parameters of proposed OSC structure.
ParameterValue
Thickness of active layer, nm70
Thickness of HTL, nm40
Defect density, 1/cm31 × 1013
Temperature, K300
Reflective coating, %50
Table 4. Comparative analysis of experimental and simulation results.
Table 4. Comparative analysis of experimental and simulation results.
ParametersSimulation without
Reflective Coating
Simulation with Reflective CoatingExperimental
[16]
Voc (V)1.01401.02760.85
FF (%)60.4259.5067
Jsc (mA/cm2)14.7618.94014.8
PCE (%)9.0411.588.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, M.R.; Jarząbek, B. Parametric Optimization of High-Dielectric Organic Thin-Film Solar Cells. Mater. Proc. 2024, 17, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024017016

AMA Style

Khan MR, Jarząbek B. Parametric Optimization of High-Dielectric Organic Thin-Film Solar Cells. Materials Proceedings. 2024; 17(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024017016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Muhammad Raheel, and Bożena Jarząbek. 2024. "Parametric Optimization of High-Dielectric Organic Thin-Film Solar Cells" Materials Proceedings 17, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024017016

APA Style

Khan, M. R., & Jarząbek, B. (2024). Parametric Optimization of High-Dielectric Organic Thin-Film Solar Cells. Materials Proceedings, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024017016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop