Next Article in Journal
Novel Approach to the Preparation of Lead Chalcogenide Colloidal Quantum Dots and Properties Thereof
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) in Cyclic Carbonate Production using a Green Method: An Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Low-Cost Hydrothermally Synthesized Multifunctional Rare Earth Metal Yttrium Cerium Oxide †

by
Shivangi Srivastava
* and
Narendra Kumar Pandey
Department of Physics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226007, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Online Conference on Nanomaterials, 5–19 May 2023; Available online: https://iocn2023.sciforum.net.
Mater. Proc. 2023, 14(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14542
Published: 5 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Online Conference on Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
In this study, YCeO nanocomposites were efficaciously synthesized by the hydrothermal method in the company of sodium hydroxide as a reducing agent as well as cerium nitrate and yttrium nitrate as precursors. Synthesis temperature and pressure, during hydrothermal reactions, show a critical role in governing the shape, size, oxygen vacancy attentiveness, and low-temperature reducibility in CeO2-based nanocomposites. The lattice constants of the yttrium ceria nanocomposite also are contingent upon the attentiveness of hydroxide ions which primes better morphology at low temperature and pressure. The X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) pattern of YCeO shows the cubic structure of space group Fm3m, having a density of 6.74 gm cm−3, volume of 157.81 × 106 pm3, crystallite size of 18.66 nm, and lattice strain of 0.0041, and many more structural parameters were calculated. Field Emission-Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) studies show the granular structure and surface roughness. Surface porosity and specific surface area were observed by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), average nanoparticle size was analyzed by the analyzer, and optical properties were observed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and UV-Visible spectroscopy in which the presence of functional and carboxyl group were analysed by FTIR and absorption wavelength 256.58 nm and band gap 3.27 eV were analysed by UV-Visible spectroscopy, lastly thermal stability of this nanoparticle was analyzed by Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis (TGA).

1. Introduction

Rare earth metal oxides are very rousing materials due to their exclusive optical, electronic, and magnetic properties [1]. All these chattels lead to many real-world applications such as optics communications, optical displays, efficient catalysis, UV shielding, medical diagnosis, and industries [2]. Therefore, it primes extensive high-tech applications to occur because the quantum efficiency is too low [3]. In general, all of these applications necessitate nanoparticles to have explicit possessions. Cerium oxide nanoparticles have advanced tremendously in the fields of biomedical sciences and industry, among others; not only have all of these applications been verified to be obligatory for humans, but they are also playing a noteworthy role in the worldwide economic growth of many businesses. The studies conducted in this expanse have provided decisive evidence of the signs of progress and establishment. On the other hand, yttrium oxide nanoparticles have many uses in the dominion of materials research, including coloring television picture tubes, flat panels, plasma displays, strong microwave filters, and many more. A critical starting point for the inorganic amalgamation of chemicals is yttrium oxide, which also has the capability to emanate red light, a feature employed in fluorescent lighting. In addition, it has a great application in X-ray and X-ray sensors that exploit ultrafast sensors and many more additional applications.
However, there are presently fewer reports on the investigation of novel CeO2/Y2O3 composite materials with cubic structure and mesopores, which are intriguing scenarios for a variety of applications due to their massive surface area, stability, and low noxiousness. Several procedures have been working to create nanocomposites with the anticipated properties, together with co-precipitation [4], sol-gel [5], solvothermal [6], sonochemical [7], electrochemical approach [8], sputtering [9,10], arc-discharge [11], and solvothermal [7]. In light of this, we designated the synthesis and properties of cerium/yttrium oxide nanoparticles made using the hydrothermal method, a straightforward technique for creating nanocrystals from aqueous solutions at low temperatures and high vapor pressures in an autoclave lined with Teflon. After that XRD, FE-SEM, AFM, nanoparticle size analyzer, FTIR, UV-visible, BET, and TGA characterizations were performed for a complete understanding the nature and behaviour of the as prepared YCeO.

2. Materials and Methods

In this present work, high-purity chemical reagents were of srl grade after being used without further purification. We use hydrothermal synthesis for the preparation of conflation of nanoparticles, a sufficient amount of 0.1 M cerium (III) nitrate hexahydrate (Ce (NO3)3·6H2O) and 0.1 M yttrium (III) nitrate hexahydrate (Y(NO3)3·6H2O) were dissolved in distilled water for 6 h to create the homogeneous solution. At the same time, 0.5 M of NaOH was dissolved in distilled water until it completely dissolved. Then NaOH was added dropwise slowly to the previous solution at room temperature until the pH became 10–11 with continuous stirring to attain a completely homogeneous solution. After that, the complete mixture was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and placed in an oven at 160 °C for 8 h. Then the autoclave was taken outside and allowed to cool at room temperature, a little pale-yellow precipitate was formed, which was kept in the oven at 100 °C for drying. Thus, the obtained powder was annealed at 550 °C then allowed to cool at room temperature, and powdered nanocomposite YCeO was formed, mixed with cerium/yttrium nanocomposites which are given in the following chemical Equations (1) and (2).
Ce (NO3)3(aq) + Y(NO3)3(aq) + 6NaOH → Ce (OH)3(s) + Y(OH)3(s)+ 6NaNO3(aq)
Ce (OH)3(s) + 4Y(OH)3(s) + O2 → 4CeO2(s) + 4Y2O3(s) + 12H2O(L)

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis

Powder X-ray diffraction, a non-destructive analytical technique for identifying the multiple crystalline phases of binary metal oxide nanocomposite, was used to examine the crystalline phase of the samples as prepared. Using a powder diffractometer and Cu-K radiations with a 2-theta range of 10°–80°, it was captured. The phases of cerium oxide or yttrium oxide were found among all the recorded peaks from the XRD pattern, and it is evident that all the diffraction peaks are precisely coincident with the cubic phase of bi-nary metal oxide [12,13]. Additionally, it demonstrates the produced nanoparticles’ excellent crystallinity and single phase of cubic fluorite crystal structure in the (Fm3m) space group. The X-ray diffraction was performed to obtain the crystal and phase structure of the yttrium cerium oxide, that X-ray pattern was shown in Figure 1, different 2 θ peaks were observed at 28.587, 33.128, 47.553, 56.427, 59.179, 69.524, 76.827, and 79.207 attributed to the (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (331), and (420) miller indices corresponding to the cubic structure of YCeO. The crystal structure shown in Figure 2 was obtained from XRD data and was designed by Vista software [14]. Here I can show the crystal structure of yttrium oxide [15], cerium oxide [16], and then the nanocomposite of yttrium cerium oxide [17] crystal structure by combing both structures. After that, I will show a single layer of yttrium cerium oxide for a better understanding of the atomic layer structural sites. Lastly, the multilayer cubical/slab structure of yttrium cerium oxide was also shown here to see and understand the surface structure. Then, a slab structure multi-layered structure was finally shown for a better understanding of the complete crystal structure, which was built after the composition of both nanomaterials. Different parameters were obtained such as volume density, space group, lattice/grain size, and many more calculated by refinement and different formulas as tabulated in Table 1.
The Williamson–Hall plot (β cosθ vs. sinθ) is attained from XRD results. As the laser effect increases, the slope of the Williamson–Hall plot increases. Due to strain toughening, the size of the diffraction peak increases as a result of the increase in lattice strain and the decrease in crystallite size. Crystal imperfections and distortion of strain-induced peak broadening are related by ε ≈ βs/tanθ. Scherrer-equation follows a 1/cosθ dependence but not tanθ as the W–H method. Dependent on dissimilar θ positions, the parting of size and strain broadening examination is conducted using Williamson and Hall, the graph shown in Figure 1.

3.2. FE-SEM Analysis

In examining the interactions between nanomaterials, the purity and shape of the nanoparticles are unquestionably essential elements. The two nanoparticles are therefore measured using a FESEM and the results are presented. Both nanoparticles generally showed the same morphology as fused and aggregated nanoparticles. Field emission scanning electron microscopy was performed for a better understanding of the structure and morphology; Figure 3 shows the image taken from FE-SEM at 100 nm and shows the surface morphology and calculated average particle size of 206.68 nm in the particle.

3.3. AFM Analysis

For quantitatively determining the nanometric dimensional surface roughness and for seeing the surface nano-texture of the deposited film, atomic force microscopy examination is the best option. The surface of the as-grown YCeO films has a granular texture, as seen in the AFM images in Figure 4, which is comparable to that seen in the SEM investigations. The crystallites are larger in the AFM images, though, because of tip convolution. The SEM photos show that the borders of the tiny spaces between the grains appear to be less crisp for the same reason. In contrast to the “hill” region, which is made up of numerous crystal-like structures that have certain orientations, the “valley” region is comparatively smooth. As calculated, its RMS (root mean square) roughness was 50.82 nm, mean roughness was 40.49, and average became 126.1 nm.

3.4. Nanoparticle Size Analyzer

The size of each particle as well as the size distribution range for a certain sample is determined using a nanoparticle size analyzer. In the study of nanoparticle characteristics and the interaction of cell materials, size distribution is a crucial and highly favorable feature. The size of the YCeO particles in deionized water is shown in Figure 5. According to the DLS measurement, the YCeO’s average particle size was 690 nm in 100%. Those have a particle distribution peak from 359.09 to 1726.40 nm The increased particle size (found through DLS measurement) may be due to anticipated agglomerations and dynamic scattering of the nanoparticles in the dispersion medium [18].

3.5. FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis

To determine the chemical integrity of the tested nanoparticles, FTIR measurements were carried out. The spectra are shown in Figure 6 with wave numbers ranging from 400 to 4000 cm−1. The O-H stretching vibration in OH groups is the cause of the large bandwidth that is specifically seen at 3000–3500 cm−1, according to the details of the observation. The bands observed between 1250 and 1750 cm−1 are caused by the asymmetric stretching of the C-O band, which may result from the absorption of CO2 from the environment. The bands seen at about 750 cm−1 are attributed to the Y-O bond stretching vibration as closed, with the wave number stated in the earlier investigation by Schwartz and Schwartz [19]. It can be shown from the FTIR analysis that the sample is a mixed composite of cerium and yttrium oxide. The lattice vibration modes of M-O and O-M-O correspond to the bands in the low-frequency range of 400 cm−1 to 1000 cm−1 (Ce, Y). The fact that the YO absorption bands are wider in Ce1/Y2 samples than they are in Ce2/Y1 samples suggests this [3].

3.6. UV-Visible Spectroscopy Analysis

Figure 7 illustrates the YCeO UV-vis (250–900 nm) absorption spectrum. Around 256.58 nm in the UV area is where the absorption was discovered. Particle size distribution and flaws may be to blame for the gradual increase in absorbance and broadening of the absorbance peak [19]. According to Equations (3) and (4) of Beer-relation, Lambert’s absorption coefficient (α) can be calculated: where x is the cuvette’s thickness, Io is the initial photon intensity, and I is the instantaneous photon intensity,
I = Ioe−ax
α(λ) = [ln (Io/I)]/x = [lnT/x] = 2.303A/x
The transition between extended states in the valence and conduction bands is what causes the greater value of the structure in the UV region (330–400 nm). Using Tauc’s figure, the value of the optical energy band gap for YCeO was examined. To calculate the optical band gap, Tauc’s relation from Equation (5) was employed (Eg) [20].
α = [αo (hν − Eg)n]/hν
Here, the photon energy (hν), the absorbance coefficient (α), the characteristic parameter (αo), Planck’s constant (h), and the power factor (n) are all defined. Depending on the nature of the transition, n may take on different values. Since the transition, in this case, is of the directly authorized kind, the value of n is taken to be ½ what Eg for YCeO is calculated to be 3.27 eV.

3.7. TGA Analysis

To quantify the thickness of the coating on the nanoparticle’s surface, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) might be utilized. This estimate offers details on both chemical and physical events, including stage shifts, ingestion, adsorption, desorption, composition, purity, decomposition reactions, decomposition temperatures, and absorbed moisture content. Thermal analysis, in its broadest sense, refers to a method for determining the temperature and time at which a substance undergoes physical changes when heated or cooled. TGA is a crucial tool for viewing particles at various temperatures since an object’s temperature affects the mobility of its particles (the higher the temperature, the faster the particles must move to maintain stability). From Figure 8 where 0.83% of the weight is lost at 200 °C and at last only 1.15% of the weight is lost up to 1000 °C, it can be shown that yttrium cerium oxide nanocomposite has better stability at high temperatures also.

3.8. BET Analysis

Using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analytical physical characterization approach, solid materials’ precise surface areas and porosity distributions are quantified. A wide variety of solid matrices, including monolithic materials and catalyst powders, can be used using this approach [21]. In this present work BET with nitrogen dioxide at a saturated pressure of 101.54 [kPa], a sample weight of 0.05 g with 9.792 slandered volume at an adsorption temperature of 77 k was used. We observed the volume of YCeO was 1.8573 cm3/g, and the specific surface area was calculated as 8.084 m2/g which is shown in Figure 9, where the pore graph of the material shows its porosity, from this, the relative pressure or total pore volume (p/po) was 0.090 cm3/g, and the mean pore diameter calculated was 44.983 nm. Hence, it was observed that YCeO has a great specific surface area and porous material which proves that this material has to play a great and prominent role in many applications.

4. Conclusions

In this present work, the rare earth metal yttrium cerium oxide was synthesized through one-step hydrothermal synthesis using yttrium nitrate (III) hexahydrate and cerium nitrate (III) hexahydrate as starting precursors. XRD characterization was performed for understanding the structure of YCeO nanocomposite and found a well-shaped cubic structure and many more parameters calculated from Xpert Highscore and Fullprof software. For a complete analysis of the structural morphology, FE-SEM was performed, and the calculated average particle size was 206.68 nm. Further, AFM was performed for the surface roughness, and DLS measurement was performed to obtain an average particle size peak and the distribution was 690 nm and 359.09 to 1726.40 nm. FTIR confirmed the functional groups present, UV-visible observed the wavelength of 256.68 nm and found the band gap of 3.27 eV, TGA confirmed the nanocomposite stability up to 1000 °C, and lastly, BET found the specific surface area of YCeO was 8.084 m2/g and the mean pore diameter was 44.983 nm. This report purely focused on the structural and morphological properties of yttrium cerium oxide nanocomposite and found that yttrium cerium oxide contains a high specific surface area and has an average particle size which plays an important role in the adsorption process, heterogeneous catalysis, detection of molecules in a gaseous environment, biological applications, and many more. This YCeO nanocomposite synthesized using a low-cost technique is suitable for a wide range of applications such as sensors, industry, automobiles, etc.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IOCN2023-14542/s1, Presentation Video: Low-Cost Hydrothermally Synthesized Multifunctional Rare Earth Metal Yttrium Cerium Oxide.

Author Contributions

Visualization, writing, graphics, and characterization: S.S.; supervision, formal analysis, visualization: N.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available on demand.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank my supervisor or guide as well as our Head of Department, N.K. Pandey (University of Lucknow) for always supporting us. Secondly, I would like to thank Mohammad Abu Sazz (Banaras Hindu University) for helping me with the research synthesis. Third, I would like to thank Rajiv Prakash, Dean (IIT BHU) for helping me to use the hydrothermal technique. I would also thank to the CIF (Central instrument facility) of IIT BHU for helping in the XRD, TGA, and BHU for using AFM. Thanks to BSIP Lucknow for the FE-SEM characterization, and lastly the chemistry department at University of Lucknow for use of the UV-visible and FTIR facility and chemistry department, BBAU for BET facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Xie, S.; Liu, Y.; Lu, X.; Tong, Y. Facile electrochemical synthesis of CeO2 hierarchical nanorods and nanowire with excellent photocatalytic activities. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 2581–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Goharshadi, E.K.; Samiee, S.; Nancarrow, P. Fabrication of cerium oxide nanoparticles: Characterization and optical properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 356, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kaviyarasu, K.; Manikandan, E.; Nuru, Z.Y.; Maaza, M. Investigation on the structural properties of CeO2 nanofibers via CTAB surfactant. Mater. Lett. 2015, 160, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ameta, K.L.; Papnai, N.; Ameta, R. Photocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Using Nano-sized cerium-iron Oxide. Orbital Electron. J. Chem. 2014, 6, 4–19. [Google Scholar]
  5. Magdalene, C.M.; Kaviyarasu, K.; Vijaya, J.J.; Jayakumar, C.; Maaza, M.; Jeyaraj, B. Photocatalytic degradation effect of malachite green and catalytic hydrogenation by UV–illuminated CeO2/CdO multilayered nanoplatelet arrays: Investigation of antifungal and antimicrobial activities. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017, 169, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gu, S.; Chen, Y.; Yuan, X.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Wu, Z.; Zeng, G. Facile synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles sensitized CdS nanorods photocatalyst with improved visible-light photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 79556–79564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Askarinejad, A.; Morsali, A. Syntheses and characterization of CdCO3 and CdO nanoparticles by using a sonochemical method. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, M.; Li, H.; Shen, X.P.; Ji, Z.Y.; Xu, K.Q. Facile electrochemical synthesis of CeO2@Ag@CdS nanotube arrays with enhanced photoelectrochemically water splitting performance. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 19935–19941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Couture, P.; Williams, G.V.M.; Kennedy, J.; Leveneur, J.; Murmu, P.P.; Chong, S.V.; Rubanov, S. Multiferroic nanocrystalline BiFeO3 and BiCrO3 thin films prepared by ion beam sputtering. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 14, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Couture, P.; Williams, G.V.M.; Kennedy, J.; Leveneur, J.; Murmu, P.P.; Chong, S.V.; Rubanov, S. Nanocrystalline multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films made by room temperature sputtering and thermal annealing, and formation of an iron oxide-induced exchange bias. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 3061–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kennedy, J.; Fang, F.; Futter, J.; Leveneur, J.; Murmu, P.P.; Panin, G.N.; Kang, T.W.; Manikandan, E. Synthesis and enhanced field emission of zinc oxide incorporated carbon nanotubes. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2017, 71, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Porqueras, I.; Pearson, C.; Corbella, C.; Vives, M.; Pinyol, A.; Bertran, E. Characteristics of e-beam deposited electrochromic CeO2 thin films. Solid State Ion. 2003, 165, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, S.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, X. Degradation of Rhodamine B and Safranin-T by MoO3:CeO2 Nanofibers and Air Using a Continuous Mode. Clean-Soil Air Water 2010, 38, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Frazer, K.A.; Pachter, L.; Poliakov, A.; Rubin, E.M.; Dubchak, I. VISTA: Computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W273–W279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Baldinozzi, G.; Berar, J.-F.; Calvarin, G. Rietveld refinement of two-phase Zr-doped Y2O3. Mater. Sci. Forum 1998, 278-281, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Artini, C.; Costa, G.A.; Pani, M.; Lausi, A.; Plaisier, J. Structural characterization of the CeO2/Gd2O3 mixed system by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. J. Solid State Chem. 2012, 190, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brauer, G.; Gradinger, H. Über heterotype Mischphasen bei Seltenerdoxyden. I. J. Inorg. Gen. Chem. 1954, 276, 209–226. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahapatra, C.; Singh, R.K.; Lee, J.H.; Jung, J.; Hyun, J.K.; Kim, H.W. Nano shape varied cerium oxide nanomaterials rescue human dental stem cells from oxidative insult through intracellular or extracellular actions. Acta Biomater. 2017, 50, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Traina, C.A.; Schwartz, J. Surface modification of Y2O3 nanoparticles. Langmuir 2007, 23, 9158–9916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Verma, A.; Chaudhary, P.; Tripathi, R.K.; Yadav, B.C. Transient photodetection studies on 2D ZnO nanostructures prepared by simple organic-solvent assisted route. Sens. Actuators A Phy. 2021, 321, 112600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hassellöv, M.; Readman, J.W.; Ranville, J.F.; Tiede, K. Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17, 344–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) XRD pattern of YCeO and (b) shows the graph of W.H plot.
Figure 1. (a) XRD pattern of YCeO and (b) shows the graph of W.H plot.
Materproc 14 00026 g001
Figure 2. Different crystals of YCeO. (a) the structure of CeO2, (b) the structure of Y2O3, (c) the complete crystal structure of cubic YCeO, (d) the single layer of YCeO, (e) multilayer crystal cubic structure of YCeO.
Figure 2. Different crystals of YCeO. (a) the structure of CeO2, (b) the structure of Y2O3, (c) the complete crystal structure of cubic YCeO, (d) the single layer of YCeO, (e) multilayer crystal cubic structure of YCeO.
Materproc 14 00026 g002
Figure 3. (a) shows the FE-SEM micrograph of YCeO under 100 nm and (b) shows the average particle distribution size which was calculated by the micrograph image FE-SEM.
Figure 3. (a) shows the FE-SEM micrograph of YCeO under 100 nm and (b) shows the average particle distribution size which was calculated by the micrograph image FE-SEM.
Materproc 14 00026 g003
Figure 4. The 3D view of the AFM micrograph observed of a yttrium cerium oxide nanoparticle in the nanometer range.
Figure 4. The 3D view of the AFM micrograph observed of a yttrium cerium oxide nanoparticle in the nanometer range.
Materproc 14 00026 g004
Figure 5. Graph of nanoparticle size distribution.
Figure 5. Graph of nanoparticle size distribution.
Materproc 14 00026 g005
Figure 6. FTIR spectra of yttrium cerium oxide nanocomposite.
Figure 6. FTIR spectra of yttrium cerium oxide nanocomposite.
Materproc 14 00026 g006
Figure 7. (a) shows the UV-visible absorption spectra and (b) shows the band gap of yttrium cerium oxide nanocomposite.
Figure 7. (a) shows the UV-visible absorption spectra and (b) shows the band gap of yttrium cerium oxide nanocomposite.
Materproc 14 00026 g007
Figure 8. The TGA graph observed of yttrium cerium oxide nanoparticles for thermal stability.
Figure 8. The TGA graph observed of yttrium cerium oxide nanoparticles for thermal stability.
Materproc 14 00026 g008
Figure 9. (a) shows the adsorption and desorption of NO2 and (b) shows the pore size of YCeO.
Figure 9. (a) shows the adsorption and desorption of NO2 and (b) shows the pore size of YCeO.
Materproc 14 00026 g009
Table 1. Calculated structural parameters of YCeO crystal structure.
Table 1. Calculated structural parameters of YCeO crystal structure.
S. NoCalculated ParametersYCeO
1.Empirical FormulaCe0.80O1.90Y0.20
2.Chemical FormulaY0.20Ce0.80O1.90
3.Lattice systemCubic
4.Crystal systemCubic
5.Space groupFm3m
6.Space number225
7.a (Å)5.4040
8.b (Å)5.4040
9.c (Å)5.4040
10.α (°)90
11.β (°)90
12.γ (°)90
13.Density (gm cm−3)6.74
14.Volume (106) pm3157.81
15.Z (no. of molecules)4
16.RIR (Reference intensity ratio)13.60
17.Crystallite (grain) size (nm)18.66
18.Lattice Strain0.0041
19.Dimensionality3D
20.Degree of Freedom6
21.R-Square (COD)0.16363
22.Adj. R-Square0.02423
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Srivastava, S.; Pandey, N.K. Low-Cost Hydrothermally Synthesized Multifunctional Rare Earth Metal Yttrium Cerium Oxide. Mater. Proc. 2023, 14, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14542

AMA Style

Srivastava S, Pandey NK. Low-Cost Hydrothermally Synthesized Multifunctional Rare Earth Metal Yttrium Cerium Oxide. Materials Proceedings. 2023; 14(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Srivastava, Shivangi, and Narendra Kumar Pandey. 2023. "Low-Cost Hydrothermally Synthesized Multifunctional Rare Earth Metal Yttrium Cerium Oxide" Materials Proceedings 14, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14542

APA Style

Srivastava, S., & Pandey, N. K. (2023). Low-Cost Hydrothermally Synthesized Multifunctional Rare Earth Metal Yttrium Cerium Oxide. Materials Proceedings, 14(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2023-14542

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop