Next Article in Journal
Addressing Manufacturing and Cost Challenges Toward Solving Low-Cost In Situ Digital Holographic Microscopy Problems
Previous Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Antioxidant Potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extracts: An In Vitro Screening Study †

by
Rohit Malik
*,
Arun Mittal
and
Prashant Kumar
*
SRM Modinagar College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi-NCR Campus, Delhi-Meerut Road, Modinagar, Ghaziabad 201204, Uttar Pradesh, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 4–6 December 2024; https://sciforum.net/event/ASEC2024.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 87(1), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025087107
Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease is a degenerative neurological condition mostly affecting memory and cognitive abilities in older people. This study aimed to determine how acteoside, a major plant phytoconstituent, protects against neuronal death in the hippocampus region, activates the cholinergic system, and acts as an antioxidant to help people with Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Early research on the extraction process and subsequent in vitro testing revealed that the plant extract had potent antioxidant qualities. Initial assessment highlighted the yield percentage, which was 14.10% using the Soxhlet method. In order to explore this plant’s possible medical uses, further in vivo studies are required.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common kind of dementia, develops gradually and leads to the impairment of behavior, mood, and cognitive function. More than 36 million people worldwide are affected by this age-related neurodegenerative illness. Furthermore, it has been estimated that this number would surpass 115 million by 2050 [1]. However, the degenerative process that causes AD starts well before typical symptoms appear, so there is a widespread sentiment that therapies must start as soon as the disease is diagnosed in order to have the most beneficial effect on the illness. None of the currently available therapies prevent or cure the illness, even though they can be beneficial by the time AD is diagnosed [2,3]. In order to increase our awareness of the condition and develop better techniques for early identification when neuronal protection is feasible, it is crucial to switch the diagnostic emphasis towards the detection of more preclinical AD. Adult-onset dementia is thought to be mostly brought on by neurodegeneration. Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy bodies, vascular dementia, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and Parkinson’s disease are the most common degenerative dementias among elderly people [4,5]. On the other hand, non-neurodegenerative mild cognitive impairment can be brought on by vitamin deficiency, hypothyroidism, chronic alcohol abuse, cognitive impairment from chemical therapy, normal pressure hydrocephalus, viral infections like human immunodeficiency virus, subdural hematomas, brain tumors, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and psychiatric conditions like anxiety, as well as profound depression. Preclinical AD is defined by a lengthy period during which cognitive performance is unaffected but neuropathological deficits in AD begin to accumulate [6,7]. Biomarkers for preclinical AD have gained a lot of attention from both doctors and researchers as instruments that aid in the detection and diagnosis of the illness. The condition often begins with increasing memory loss; however, sometimes the predominant symptoms are behavioral, visuospatial, or linguistic. After Alzheimer’s disease symptoms appear, survivors typically live for 10 to 12 years. The “preclinical” stage of Alzheimer’s disease, which starts 20 years before symptoms appear, is defined by the gradual buildup of protein amyloid plaques (also called neuritic plaques or amyloid plaques), neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), and amyloid beta (Aβ) [8,9]. The pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease is complex and involves various molecular, cellular, and structural alterations in the brain. This discussion provides an overview of the key aspects of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease [3]. Despite the availability of pharmaceutical interventions, the potential neuroprotective and therapeutic benefits of plants and their phytoconstituents have drawn attention to their use in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Numerous plants and their phytoconstituents have potent anti-Alzheimer’s and antioxidant properties. One of the main causes of AD pathogenesis is oxidative stress, which results in the buildup of free radicals and the death of neurons. Acorus calamus [8], Curcumin [10], Ginkgo biloba [11], Bacopa monnieri [12], Panax Ginseng [13], grapes and berries [14], Ashwagandha [15], Rhodiola Rosea [16], and many more plants have been used to treat Alzheimer’s disease.
A valuable traditional medicinal plant in the Lamiaceae family is Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Subtropical areas of certain Asian nations, including China and India, are home to this thick, wool-like shrub. Acteoside, a phytoconstituent found in Colebrookea oppostifolia, has gained attention for its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting a potential role in addressing AD through dietary interventions. Verbascoside, also referred to as acteoside, is a phenylethanoid glycoside that is present in olives and several other plants, including species of Verbascum. Acteoside may have neuroprotective effects through modulating different cellular pathways, according to research. Because of its antioxidant qualities, it helps to counteract free radicals, which are linked to the oxidative stress seen in AD pathology [17]. The development of AD is significantly aided by chronic neuroinflammation. Acteoside has been shown to have anti-inflammatory qualities by lowering microglia activation and preventing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [18]. These anti-inflammatory properties might be extremely important in reducing the inflammatory processes linked to AD. The buildup of beta-amyloid plaques in the brain is one of the characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease. Acteoside has been investigated for its ability to impede the formation of toxic protein aggregates by interfering with the beta-amyloid aggregation process [19]. Examining acteoside’s historical and cultural applications in conventional medicine is part of its ethnopharmacological study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Procurement and Extraction

The plant containing the acteoside phytoconstituents (Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm.) was obtained from near Mukteshwar in the Nanital region of the Himalayan range. Two Soxhlet assemblies—one for the roots and one for the aerial portion—were utilized throughout the extraction process. Following shade drying, the two samples were broken up into tiny bits, crushed, and put in a Soxhlet device with ethanol acting as a solvent. Using a separating funnel, we gathered the filtrate containing the active ingredients separately. A rotary evaporator was used to concentrate the filtrated extract at low pressure and low temperature.

2.2. Chemicals Used

Ethanol, chloroform, DPPH, methanol, ascorbic acid, distilled water, glycerin.

2.3. Antioxidant Assay

2,2-Diphenyl-2-Picryl-Hydrazyl Radical Scavenging (DPPH) Assay

The potential of the extracts to scavenge free radicals was assessed through the DPPH assay. The plant extract’s ability to donate hydrogen atoms was determined by monitoring the decolorization of a methanol solution of DPPH. DPPH imparts a purple color to the methanol solution, which transitions to yellow in the presence of an antioxidant. To create the plant extract stock solution, the extract was dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. From this stock solution, diluted concentrations ranging from 100 to 500 g/mL were prepared. Similarly, a standard solution of ascorbic acid was prepared within the same concentration range. The DPPH solution was then prepared in methanol at 0.135 mM. One milliliter amounts of extracts at different concentrations were then combined with one milliliter of DPPH solution. After vigorous churning, the mixture was placed in a dark place for half an hour. After that, a spectrophotometer was used to test the mixture’s absorbance at 517 nm. In order to prepare a blank, no sample was added. To assess the plant extract’s antioxidant activity, its absorbance was contrasted with the concentration of the standard solution (ascorbic acid) [20].

3. Results

3.1. Percentage Yield of Plant Extract

The yield percentage of the aerial plant extract (Table 1) was 13.80 percent (w/w), and for the root extract (Table 2) it was 14.10 percent (w/w) when the semi-solid residue was lyophilized to create a fine powder.

3.2. Antioxidant Assay (DPPH Assay)

The plant extract demonstrated notable DPPH radical scavenging activity in a manner dependent on the dosage. Table 3 and Table 4 and Figure 1 illustrate that the standard ascorbic acid displayed the highest scavenging activity, followed by the root extract and the aerial plant extract. However, upon comparing the two plant extracts, it is evident that the root extract exhibits superior antioxidant activity compared to the aerial plant extract. A lower IC50 value indicates stronger antioxidant activity. The DPPH assay was performed in triplicate (n = 3) for each sample concentration.

4. Discussion

Acteoside, a bioactive compound present in various plant species, has gained attention for its potential antioxidant properties. This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing acteoside, specifically focusing on comparing the efficacy of root extract versus aerial plant extract using the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) method. The results unveiled significant antioxidant activity in both extracts, with a noteworthy observation that the root extract displayed superior antioxidant efficacy in comparison to the aerial plant extract. The DPPH assay, a widely employed method for assessing antioxidant capacity, hinges on the capability of antioxidants to furnish hydrogen atoms to DPPH radicals, leading to the decolorization of the DPPH solution. The dose-dependent pattern exhibited by the plant extracts in substantial DPPH radical scavenging activity underscores the potency of acteoside in conferring antioxidant properties to these extracts. In Table 3 and Figure 1, the standard ascorbic acid served as a benchmark with the highest scavenging activity, aligning with its well-established antioxidant reputation. Subsequently, both the root extract and the aerial plant extract demonstrated antioxidant activity, albeit at varying levels. Acteoside, categorized as a phenylethanoid glycoside, is renowned for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties. Its presence in plant extracts hints at a potential natural source for antioxidants with therapeutic implications.
Furthermore, the in vitro nature of the DPPH assay does not fully replicate the dynamic and complex conditions within a living organism. Consequently, the findings should be interpreted in the context of the experimental setup and may not entirely represent the physiological intricacies of in vivo antioxidant activity. The implications of this study are noteworthy for the potential utilization of these plant extracts as natural antioxidants in diverse applications, including pharmaceuticals, food, and cosmetics. The superior performance of the root extract suggests that targeted extraction methods focusing on specific plant parts enriched in acteoside could enhance antioxidant yields for practical applications. In the future, it will be crucial to investigate analytical methods that accurately ascertain acteoside concentration. Determining the identity and amount of this bioactive substance will be crucial in developing focused therapies. Advanced analytical methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) or mass spectrometry, can be employed to discern acteoside levels with precision and reliability. This analytical method will help us better understand how the compound is distributed throughout plant tissues and make it possible to create standardized formulations that can be used therapeutically. In parallel, to evaluate acteoside’s therapeutic potential in the context of Alzheimer’s disease, future research efforts should incorporate in vivo parameters in addition to in vitro assays. Animal models, especially those that replicate the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease, can provide information about the compound’s capacity to cross the blood–brain barrier and confer neuroprotective effects. Furthermore, it is imperative to investigate the effects of acteoside on particular molecular pathways linked to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Because of its phenylethanoid glycoside nature, the compound has anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective qualities, making it a promising candidate for treating the various aspects of Alzheimer’s disease.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, root extract containing acteoside had showed its antioxidant properties and potential in preventing Alzheimer’s disease. However, further in vivo experimental studies (behavioral, biochemical and histological studies) are required to continue this study. Initial results, such as a 14.10% yield using Soxhlet extraction and the DPPH antioxidant parameter assay, demonstrate its potential for medicinal use. To properly investigate its medicinal uses and confirm its effectiveness in treating Alzheimer’s-type dementia, further research is required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M. and A.M.; methodology, R.M.; software, R.M.; validation, R.M., A.M. and P.K.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.; writing—review and editing, R.M., A.M. and P.K.; supervision, A.M. and P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data for this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the SRM Institute of Science and Technology for providing research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADAlzheimer’s disease
TBITraumatic brain injury
NFTsNeurofibrillary tangles
Amyloid beta
DPPH2,2-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl

References

  1. Urbańska, K.; Szcześniak, D.; Rymaszewska, J. The stigma of dementia. Postępy Psychiatr. I Neurol. 2015, 24, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tan, C.C.; Yu, J.T.; Wang, H.F.; Tan, M.S.; Meng, X.F.; Wang, C.; Jiang, T.; Zhu, X.-C.; Tan, L. Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2014, 41, 615–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malik, R.; Kalra, S.; Bhatia, S.; Al Harrasi, A.; Singh, G.; Mohan, S.; Makeen, H.A.; Albratty, M.; Meraya, A.; Bahar, B.; et al. Overview of therapeutic targets in management of dementia. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 152, 113168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Knopman, D.S.; Jack, C.R., Jr.; Wiste, H.J.; Weigand, S.D.; Vemuri, P.; Lowe, V.; Kantarci, K.; Gunter, J.L.; Senjem, M.L.; Ivnik, R.J.; et al. Short-term clinical outcomes for stages of NIA-AA preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2012, 78, 1576–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Price, J.L.; Morris, J.C. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Neurol. Off. J. Am. Neurol. Assoc. Child Neurol. Soc. 1999, 45, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kalra, S.; Malik, R.; Singh, G.; Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Mohan, S.; Albratty, M.; Albarrati, A.; Tambuwala, M.M. Pathogenesis and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI): Role of neuroinflammation and anti-inflammatory drugs. Inflammopharmacology 2022, 30, 1153–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jiang, T.; Yu, J.T.; Tian, Y.; Tan, L. Epidemiology and etiology of Alzheimer’s disease: From genetic to non-genetic factors. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2013, 10, 852–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Malik, R.; Kalra, S.; Singh, G.; Gahlot, V.; Kajal, A. Antioxidative and neuroprotective potential of Acorus calamus Linn. and Cordia dichotoma G. Forst. In Alzheimer’s type dementia in rodent. Brain Res. 2024, 1822, 148616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hooda, P.; Malik, R.; Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Najmi, A.; Zoghebi, K.; Halawi, M.A.; Makeen, H.A.; Mohan, S. Phytoimmunomodulators: A review of natural modulators for complex immune system. Heliyon 2023, 10, e23790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pluta, R.; Furmaga-Jabłońska, W.; Januszewski, S.; Czuczwar, S.J. Post-ischemic brain neurodegeneration in the form of Alzheimer’s disease proteinopathy: Possible therapeutic role of curcumin. Nutrients 2022, 14, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Oken, B.S.; Storzbach, D.M.; Kaye, J.A. The efficacy of Ginkgo biloba on cognitive function in Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 1998, 55, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Stough, C.; Downey, L.A.; Lloyd, J.; Silber, B.; Redman, S.; Hutchison, C.; Wesnes, K.; Nathan, P.J. Examining the nootropic effects of a special extract of Bacopa monniera on human cognitive functioning: 90 day double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Phytother. Res. Int. J. Devoted Pharmacol. Toxicol. Eval. Nat. Prod. Deriv. 2008, 22, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ong, W.Y.; Farooqui, T.; Koh, H.L.; Farooqui, A.A.; Ling, E.A. Protective effects of ginseng on neurological disorders. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015, 7, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Turner, R.S.; Thomas, R.G.; Craft, S.; Van Dyck, C.H.; Mintzer, J.; Reynolds, B.A.; Brewer, J.B.; Rissman, R.A.; Raman, R.; Aisen, P.S.; et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of resveratrol for Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2015, 85, 1383–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kuboyama, T.; Tohda, C.; Komatsu, K. Effects of Ashwagandha (roots of Withania somnifera) on neurodegenerative diseases. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 37, 892–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Perfumi, M.; Mattioli, L. Adaptogenic and central nervous system effects of single doses of 3% rosavin and 1% salidroside Rhodiola rosea L. extract in mice. Phytother. Res. Int. J. Devoted Pharmacol. Toxicol. Eval. Nat. Prod. Deriv. 2007, 21, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xiao, Y.; Ren, Q.; Wu, L. The pharmacokinetic property and pharmacological activity of acteoside: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 153, 113296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gao, Y.; Pu, X. Neuroprotective effect of acteoside against rotenone-induced damage of SH-SY5Y cells and its possible mechanism. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull. 1987, 12, wpr-560973. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao, L.; Wang, D.; Ren, J.; Tan, X.; Chen, J.; Kong, Z.; Nie, Y.; Yan, M. Acteoside ameliorates learning and memory impairment in APP/PS1 transgenic mice by increasing Aβ degradation and inhibiting tau hyperphosphorylation. Phytother. Res. 2024, 38, 1735–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Baliyan, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Priyadarshini, A.; Vibhuti, A.; Gupta, A.; Pandey, R.P.; Chang, C.M. Determination of antioxidants by DPPH radical scavenging activity and quantitative phytochemical analysis of Ficus religiosa. Molecules 2022, 27, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. DPPH scavenging assay of ascorbic acid, root extract and aerial plant extract.
Figure 1. DPPH scavenging assay of ascorbic acid, root extract and aerial plant extract.
Engproc 87 00107 g001
Table 1. Percentage yield (aerial part) by using hot continuous process (Soxhlet).
Table 1. Percentage yield (aerial part) by using hot continuous process (Soxhlet).
First
Sample
Solvent UsedSample WeightFinal Extract
Obtained
Percentage Yield (w/w)
Aerial partEthanol500 g69 g13.80
Table 2. Percentage yield (roots) by using hot continuous process (Soxhlet).
Table 2. Percentage yield (roots) by using hot continuous process (Soxhlet).
Second SampleSolvent UsedSample WeightFinal Extract
Obtained
Percentage Yield (w/w)
RootsEthanol500 g70.5 g14.10
Table 3. DPPH scavenging activity of ascorbic acid, root extract and aerial plant extract.
Table 3. DPPH scavenging activity of ascorbic acid, root extract and aerial plant extract.
Antioxidant DPPH Assay
Concentration (μg/mL)Percentage (%) Inhibition
Standard Ascorbic Acid
IC50 Value: 315.76
Root Extract
IC50 Value: 423.62
Aerial Plant
IC50 Value: 486.39
%RSA
00000
10027.521.419.272.5
20040.830.525.479.6
30052.438.632.182.53
40060.547.241.884.87
50068555086.4
Table 4. Descriptive statistical analysis of Table 3.
Table 4. Descriptive statistical analysis of Table 3.
Concentration (g/mL)ValuesStandard Ascorbic AcidValuesRoot ExtractValuesAerial PlantValues
Mean250Mean41.53Mean32.11Mean28.08
Standard Error76.37Standard Error10.16Standard Error8.04Standard Error7.20
Median250Median46.6Median34.55Median28.75
Standard Deviation187.08Standard Deviation24.902Standard Deviation19.70Standard Deviation17.66
Sample Variance35,000Sample Variance620.15Sample Variance388.42Sample Variance311.88
Kurtosis−1.2Kurtosis0.390593Kurtosis0.268108824Kurtosis0.188460065
Skewness0Skewness−0.92783Skewness−0.73187945Skewness−0.52811084
Sum1500Sum249.2Sum192.7Sum168.5
Confidence Level (95.0%)196.33Confidence Level (95.0%)26.13Confidence Level (95.0%)20.68Confidence Level (95.0%)18.53
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malik, R.; Mittal, A.; Kumar, P. Antioxidant Potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extracts: An In Vitro Screening Study. Eng. Proc. 2025, 87, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025087107

AMA Style

Malik R, Mittal A, Kumar P. Antioxidant Potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extracts: An In Vitro Screening Study. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 87(1):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025087107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malik, Rohit, Arun Mittal, and Prashant Kumar. 2025. "Antioxidant Potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extracts: An In Vitro Screening Study" Engineering Proceedings 87, no. 1: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025087107

APA Style

Malik, R., Mittal, A., & Kumar, P. (2025). Antioxidant Potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extracts: An In Vitro Screening Study. Engineering Proceedings, 87(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025087107

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop