Next Article in Journal
A Novel SFDN+DNN Approach for Efficient Hand Movement Recognition Using Surface Electromyography Signals
Previous Article in Journal
Parametric Study on Cellular Negative Stiffness Honeycomb Meta-Structures: Effect on the Energy Absorption Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Computational Analysis of Different Stiffener Designs for Power Transformer Tank Walls †

by
Md Milon Hasan
1,
Asif Islam
2,3 and
Mohammad Abu Hasan Khondoker
4,*
1
Fabrication Division, Energypac Engineering Limited, Energy Center, 25 Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh
2
Electrical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
3
Interdisciplinary Research Center for Sustainable Energy Systems, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
4
Industrial Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S0A2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Conference on Industrial, Manufacturing, and Process Engineering (ICIMP-2024), Regina, Canada, 27–29 June 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 76(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076057
Published: 29 October 2024

Abstract

While power transformer manufacturers are well versed in electrical aspects such as ampere-turns and amps per square inch, optimizing electrical efficiency, voltage regulation, and insulation, there is a potential oversight regarding the intricate mechanical challenges associated with electrical design. As transformers evolve in size and capacity, mechanical forces become increasingly significant, necessitating a closer examination of the mechanical aspects of electrical design. This study focuses on the design of power transformer tank walls. To address the challenge associated with larger tank wall deflection (for both the high-voltage and low-voltage sides) during pressure tests, different stiffeners such as flat stiffeners, changed flat stiffener dimensions, flat bar supports for stiffeners, and H-beams were added to the tank wall and modeled for finite element analysis. The tank wall design was optimized for higher mechanical strength, lower deflection, and lower mass by assessing the von Mises stress and deformation of different stiffeners. The findings of this study will contribute to a better understanding of how design adjustments affects mechanical strength, stress distribution, and overall reliability, providing valuable insights for the industry.

1. Introduction

Power transformers are highly important for electrical power systems. They are helpful for the efficient and safe transmission of power, which helps reduce power loss. Especially when power transformers transfer energy over long distances, some energy gets lost, but with the help of a power transformer, it is possible to reduce this loss by regulating the voltage of the electrical energy for efficient transmission [1]. Their versatility makes them suitable for several of industrial and commercial applications [2]. They are integral to industries such as oil, gas and renewable energy systems like solar farms, windmills, and different industrial plants. Lastly, power transformers serve as a crucial safeguard for electrical systems and heavy machinery. Equipped with protective components like circuit breakers and fuses, they help prevent damage and ensure the smooth operation of industrial facilities. Consequently, the importance of power transformers extends beyond mere energy transfer, encompassing efficiency, versatility, and system protection.
A power transformer consists of various unique components, each contributing differently to its overall performance. The core, windings, tap changer, insulating materials, transformer tank, transformer oil, conservator, breather, Buchholz Relay, cooling tubes, and explosion vent are among the primary components [3]. The transformer tank houses the oil, providing physical support and protection to the transformer’s various components and grounding the magnetic circuit and various metal parts.
The choice of steel material for fabricating a power transformer tank depends on factors such as strength requirements, corrosion resistance, and cost-effectiveness [4]. Tank bodies are produced using stainless steel, high-carbon steel, medium-carbon and low-carbon steel. Stainless steel offers excellent corrosion resistance, making it suitable for transformers installed in harsh environments or where exposure to moisture is a concern. However, stainless steel is more expensive than carbon steel. High-carbon steel provides even higher strength but is less ductile and more prone to brittleness. It is less common in transformer tanks due to the difficulty in forming and welding, as well as concerns about its toughness [5]. Medium-carbon steel offers higher strength than low-carbon steel, but it can be more challenging to weld and form. It could be suitable for larger transformers or applications requiring increased strength. Low-carbon steel is commonly used for transformer tanks due to its weldability, formability, and relatively low cost [6]. However, for transformer tanks, a balance between strength, formability, weldability, and cost is essential, so low-carbon steel is often the preferred choice, with stainless steel being used in specialized applications where corrosion resistance is paramount.
Power transformer manufacturers initially faced a challenge in fabricating high-capacity and high-voltage level transformer tanks, leading to concerns when deflection surpassed acceptable levels during tank pressure tests. A new design incorporating changes to the stiffener designs was implemented to address this. Ensuring a transformer tank’s structural integrity and security is paramount to prevent operational failures like deformation, oil leakage, or the potential for explosions caused by excessive pressure buildup [7]. During fabrication, pressure and vacuum tests are conducted on the tank to ascertain its ability to withstand internal pressures. If the tank fails to endure these forces, it leads to deflection, potentially exceeding standard limits [8]. This deflection, when excessive, triggers issues within the tank’s body and cover, such as welding joint problems and cracks, culminating in leakages.
Among the methods available for strengthening power transformer tank bodies made from mild steel plates, adding stiffeners emerges as the most effective and cost-efficient solution [9]. Stiffeners, welded onto critical stress points, significantly enhance the structural integrity of the tank body without necessitating a complete overhaul of plate thickness or intricate forming techniques. This method provides targeted reinforcement where most needed, ensuring the tank can withstand operational stresses efficiently [10]. Additionally, the simplicity of the process translates to lower labor and material costs compared to alternatives like changing wall thickness or employing complex forming techniques, making it a pragmatic choice for bolstering transformer tank bodies.
This paper delves into improving the strength of power transformer tank bodies by incorporating different shapes of stiffeners [11]. This study uses finite element analysis to examines how various stiffener types reinforce the tank body to meet strength standards. A methodical evaluation of each stiffener variant, aims to pinpoint the best solution for fortifying transformer tank bodies, thus improving their reliability and longevity in power transmission systems. This paper details stiffeners shapes design process and computational analysis, revealing insights into the most effective configurations. The acknowledgments recognize the contributions of the individuals or organizations involved, while the conclusion summarizes the study’s findings and suggests future research paths in transformer tank design.

2. Design of Power Transformer Tank

The transformer tank under consideration is integral to the functioning of a 132 kV, three-phase power transformer with a robust rating of 120 MVA. As illustrated in Figure 1, the tank boasts inner dimensions of 5995 mm length, 2370 mm width, and 4160 mm height [12]. Employing static nonlinear finite element analysis within SolidWorks, the design process prioritized structural integrity and resilience against potential failure points, particularly under pressure testing scenarios [13]. This meticulous approach encompassed reinforcing weld joints located at critical areas such as wall corners, the bottom, the cover, and the ends of stiffeners and H-beams. The overarching design philosophy focused on enhancing tank flexibility while fortifying its strength to withstand operational stresses. The tank underwent testing at a positive pressure of 0.1 MPa, following standards to assess maximum stress and deformation.

3. Computational Analysis of HV Tank Wall

The methodology for optimizing the HV (high-voltage) tank wall in pressure testing involves several steps to ensure accurate analysis and identification of vulnerable areas. Given the complex nature of tank structures, the individual optimization of walls is deemed practical due to dissimilar arrangements and structures among tank walls, which can significantly affect parameters. Thus, the methodology initially focuses on analyzing the entire tank, followed by an individual analysis of the HV tank wall to pinpoint vulnerable sections for pressure testing.
To begin, the entire tank was assessed to understand its structural behavior under pressure. However, individual analysis was prioritized by recognizing that the HV tank wall is often the most vulnerable part due to its design and arrangement within the transformer body. This decision is supported by the observation that the HV tank wall lacks reinforcement elements in other parts of the tank, such as stiffeners in the top cover and base plates/channels in the bottom plate.
The material utilized for analyzing the transformer tank was ASTM A-36. The technical data for this raw material were provided by the supplier of the mild steel plates. Table 1 outlines the corresponding material properties of ASTM A-36.
The initial phase involved crafting a 3D solid model of the tank using SOLIDWORKS. Subsequently, the solid models were imported into the SOLIDWORKS Simulation program for finite element analysis. The materials’ properties were defined in the simulation module, and fixed support was applied to the four sides of the HV tank wall. Subsequently, a pressure of 0.1 MPa was applied to the tank wall as per the standard IEC 60076-1 article 11.10, representing typical operating conditions [14].
Table 1. Material properties of ASTM A-36 [15].
Table 1. Material properties of ASTM A-36 [15].
NameASTM A36 Steel
Model typeLinear Elastic Isotropic
Yield strength250 MPa
Tensile strength400 MPa
Elastic modulus200,000 MPa
Poisson’s ratio0.26
Mass density7850 kg/m3
Shear modulus79,300 MPa
The optimization process involved generating a sample set of parameters and sorting them based on objectives and constraints. Upon conducting a mesh dependency study, it was determined that a mesh size of 25 mm yielded sufficient accuracy for the analysis of the HV tank wall (see Table 1). The outcome was evaluated to ensure that the maximum deformation and stress values exhibited acceptable differences or were approximately equal, confirming the validity of the optimization process. The primary objectives revolve around geometric mass, maximum stress, and maximum deformation. To begin with, conventional stiffeners were incorporated into the HV tank wall, and the geometric mass, maximum stress, and maximum deformation values were assessed (Figure 2a,b). Subsequently, flat bars were introduced at every stiffener joint to enhance the structural strength (Figure 2c,d). Finally, three H beams were installed at the center of the HV tank wall instead of conventional stiffeners, as the center is the most susceptible point to stress and deformation (Figure 2e,f).
Overall, this methodology enables the identification of vulnerable sections of the HV tank wall through thorough analysis and optimization, ensuring structural integrity and safety during pressure testing.

4. Results and Discussion:

The results of the design iterations for a power transformer tank’s HV (high-voltage) wall have revealed crucial insights into the effectiveness of various structural configurations. Initially, in the original design shown in Figure 3a, the HV tank wall was constructed without additional support structures, resulting in a substantial mass of 4762.51 Kg, maximum deformation of 8.89 mm, and von Mises stress of 686 MPa (see Table 2). This design exhibited significant stress and deformation vulnerabilities, particularly evident in the cracks at the welding joints of the stiffeners, both at the bottom and top sections.
To mitigate these issues, support structures were integrated into the second design iteration as shown in Figure 3b, slightly increasing the mass to 5091.5 Kg while reducing maximum deformation to 8.14 mm and von Mises stress to 661.06 MPa. However, despite this enhancement, the introduced support structures did not entirely eradicate stress and deformation concerns, leaving room for further optimization.
The most notable improvement emerged with incorporating H-beams in the third design iteration (Figure 3c). By strategically placing three H-beams in the center of the tank wall, the mass decreased to 4846.62 Kg, with both maximum deformation and von Mises stress minimized to negligible levels (0 mm and 0.01 MPa, respectively). This substantial reduction in stress and deformation highlights the efficacy of integrating H-beams as reinforcement elements of designing power transformer tank HV walls.
The use of H-beams provides several advantages. Their strategic placement targets the areas of maximum stress and deformation, which enhances mechanical strength where it is most needed. Moreover, concentrating reinforcement in specific zones reduces the overall material usage, leading to cost savings and increased efficiency. Finally, this targeted reinforcement minimizes stress concentrations, helping to prolong the operational lifespan of the transformer tank.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research

In summary, our comprehensive analysis of design iterations for a power transformer tank’s HV wall has yielded invaluable insights into the effectiveness of various structural configurations. Initially, the absence of additional support structures in the first design iteration led to significant stress and deformation vulnerabilities, underscoring the necessity for optimization. Subsequent iterations, notably the integration of support structures in the second design iteration, marked progress in mitigating these concerns, albeit with room for further enhancement.
However, the most substantial improvement was achieved through the strategic incorporation of H-beams in the third design iteration. This innovative approach not only significantly reduced stress and deformation but also optimized material usage, resulting in a stronger and more efficient transformer tank. The targeted reinforcement provided by the H-beams precisely addressed areas of maximum stress, enhancing mechanical strength while minimizing material requirements and stress concentrations.
The utilization of H-beams presents a practical solution for transformer manufacturers seeking to optimize power transformer tank designs. By implementing this advanced structural reinforcement technique, manufacturers can enhance the reliability, efficiency, and longevity of transformer tanks in power distribution systems. This computational analysis offers valuable insights that can guide future design optimizations, ultimately contributing to the advancement of transformer technology and the reliability of power supply infrastructure.
For future work, this paper suggests investigating the impact of varying the wall thickness, stiffener thickness, and stiffener width on the power transformer tank’s performance. This comprehensive approach could lead to significant improvements in the tank’s efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and overall structural integrity. By exploring these additional parameters, researchers can optimize designs to meet the evolving demands of power transformer technology. Additionally, future work related to this paper will involve conducting a detailed thermal analysis of the HV tank wall. This analysis should confirm that any enhancements to the structural design do not compromise the transformer tank’s ability to dissipate heat, thereby ensuring optimal performance during operation effectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.H.; Methodology, M.M.H.; Software, M.M.H.; Validation, M.M.H., A.I. and M.A.H.K.; Formal Analysis, M.M.H.; Investigation, M.M.H.; Resources, M.M.H. and M.A.H.K.; Data Curation, M.M.H. and M.A.H.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.M.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.M.H. and M.A.H.K.; Visualization, M.M.H. and A.I.; Supervision, A.I. and M.A.H.K.; Project Administration, M.A.H.K. and A.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the manuscript. For further enquiries, please contact the corresponding author (mohammad.khondoker@uregina.ca).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the intellectual and technical support provided by Engr. Azimussan Abbasi of Energypac Engineering Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Md Milon Hasan was employed by the company Energypac Engineering Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schavemaker, P.; Sluis, L.V.D. Electrical Power System Essentials, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jaiswal, G.C.; Venikar, P.A.; Ballal, M.S.; Suryawanshi, H.M.; Tutakne, D.R. Smart Transformers for Industrial Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference, Pune, India, 13–15 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Harlow, J.H. Electric Power Transformer Engineering, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kulkarni, S.V.; Khaparde, S.A. Transformer Engineering: Design, Technology, and Diagnostics, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dastous, J.B.; Taschler, E.; Bélanger, S.; Sari, M.A. Comparison of Numerical Methods for Modeling Overpressure Effects from Low Impedance Faults in Power Transformers. Procedia Eng. 2017, 202, 202–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Odebiyi, O.S.; Adedayo, S.M.; Tunji, L.A.; Onuorah, M.O. A review of weldability of carbon steel in arc-based welding processes. Cogent Eng. 2019, 6, 1609180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roseberg, T.; Jankovic, I.R. Hedding Transformer Tank Rupture—A Protection Engineer’s Challenge. In Proceedings of the 70th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers (CPRE), College Station, TX, USA, 3 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. Barkan, P.; Damsky, B.L.; Ettlinger, L.F.; Kotski, E.J. Overpressure phenomena in distribution transformers with low impedance faults: Experiment and theory. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. 2006, 95, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Islam, A.; Mustafa, G.K.; Biswas, M.M.; Khan, S.I. Implementation of normalization covariance factor calculation technique to detect mechanical deformation in power transformer. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 20–22 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Islam, A.; Khan, S.T.; Hoque, A. Detection of Mechanical Deformation in Old Aged Power Transformer Using Cross Correlation Co-Efficient Analysis Method. Energy Power Eng. 2011, 3, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Akbari, V.R. Design and Analysis of Transformer Tank with Different Shape of Stiffener. Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Ideas Educ. 2018, 4, 4374–4384. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dastous, J.B.; Brodeur, S. Overpressure Test of an Arc-Resistant Power Transformer. Paper-274. In Proceedings of the CIGRE Canada Conference Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 19–22 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hackl, A.; Hamberger, P. Predict the rupture of transformer tanks with static FEM analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines, Marseille, France, 2 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Standard, I.E. 60076-1, Power transformers—Part 1: General; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  15. Indah Sari, F.; Mursid Nugraha Arifuddin, A.; Uswah Pawara, M.; Aras Mubarak, A. Experimental Test of Tensile Strength of Barge Deck Plate Welded Joints. Int. J. Metacentr. 2022, 2, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Power transformer whole tank design and (b) power transformer HV tank wall design.
Figure 1. (a) Power transformer whole tank design and (b) power transformer HV tank wall design.
Engproc 76 00057 g001
Figure 2. (a) von Mises stress of HV tank wall original design; (b) deformation of HV tank wall original design; (c) von Mises stress of HV tank wall with support added; (d) deformation of HV tank wall with support added; (e) von Misses Stress of HV tank wall with H-beam added; (f) deformation of HV tank wall with H-beam added.
Figure 2. (a) von Mises stress of HV tank wall original design; (b) deformation of HV tank wall original design; (c) von Mises stress of HV tank wall with support added; (d) deformation of HV tank wall with support added; (e) von Misses Stress of HV tank wall with H-beam added; (f) deformation of HV tank wall with H-beam added.
Engproc 76 00057 g002aEngproc 76 00057 g002b
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of masses with three types of stiffeners. (b) Comparison of stresses with three types of stiffeners. (c) Comparison of deformations with three types of stiffeners.
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of masses with three types of stiffeners. (b) Comparison of stresses with three types of stiffeners. (c) Comparison of deformations with three types of stiffeners.
Engproc 76 00057 g003
Table 2. Simulation results of mass, maximum deformation, and von Mises stress.
Table 2. Simulation results of mass, maximum deformation, and von Mises stress.
Design
Parameters
Mass (kg)Maximum
Deformation (mm)
Von Mises
Stress (MPa)
Original Design4762.518.89686
Support Added5091.58.14661.06
H-Beam Added4846.6200.01
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasan, M.M.; Islam, A.; Khondoker, M.A.H. Computational Analysis of Different Stiffener Designs for Power Transformer Tank Walls. Eng. Proc. 2024, 76, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076057

AMA Style

Hasan MM, Islam A, Khondoker MAH. Computational Analysis of Different Stiffener Designs for Power Transformer Tank Walls. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 76(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hasan, Md Milon, Asif Islam, and Mohammad Abu Hasan Khondoker. 2024. "Computational Analysis of Different Stiffener Designs for Power Transformer Tank Walls" Engineering Proceedings 76, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076057

APA Style

Hasan, M. M., Islam, A., & Khondoker, M. A. H. (2024). Computational Analysis of Different Stiffener Designs for Power Transformer Tank Walls. Engineering Proceedings, 76(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076057

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop