Next Article in Journal
Use of H2O2 for the Morphology Control of Silver Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
Electrode Modified with Manganese Dioxide Nanorods for the Simultaneous Voltammetric Determination of Food Colorants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Reasons for High Adsorption Efficiencies in Lead Removal from Aquatic Solution †

Department of Environmental Engineering, Aksaray University, Aksaray 68100, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 1–15 December 2022; Available online: https://asec2022.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 31(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13812
Published: 5 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
Heavy metals are of great concern worldwide in terms of environmental pollution due to their effects, such as persistence in the environment, bioaccumulation, and toxicity for organisms. These pollutants in a non-biodegradable inorganic form are released into water, soil, and air from different industrial sectors Lead ions are also a toxic heavy metal in terms of human health and this pollutant is permanent in the ecosystem. Among the many treatment methods, adsorption is an inexpensive, eco-friendly, and efficient process for removing Pb ions from water contaminated with lead ions. The most important detail that draws attention both in our research of the literature and in our own studies is that very high removal efficiencies of lead ions can be obtained with many different inorganic and organic adsorbents. Such high removal efficiencies cannot be obtained for other heavy metals and metalloids. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the difference in the adsorption process of lead. The physicochemical and biological properties of lead ions and the effects of specific properties, such as amphoteric structure, free electron, post-transition metal, and the low melting temperature, were investigated accordingly.

1. Introduction

Although the restriction of anthropogenic activities during the COVID-19 pandemic process minimized the pressure on environmental pollution, the rapid normalization and growth process in the fields of energy, agriculture, and industry rapidly increased environmental pollution. Pollutants that cause environmental pollution are toxic and permanent. Generally, heavy metals take the first place in the environmental toxic substances class and cause significant damage by affecting the entire ecosystem [1,2]. These damages are due to their non-biodegradability, high toxicity, and large discharges into the environment [3,4].
Lead has a toxic effect for all living groups due to its properties, such as entering the food chain, being absorbed, and accumulating in the tissues [5]. It is a non-biodegradable metal that can cause diseases such as cancer, anemia, kidney failure, and neurological effects in humans [6,7,8,9]. In particular, Pb emissions are high as a result of industry-based anthropogenic activities (automobile industry, tetra-ethyl production, battery production, cable production, the ceramics industry, gasoline) [10]. Pb is a pollutant with a high molecular weight and the greatest global spread compared to other heavy metals, and it is an important factor in water pollution. In this direction, Pb removal from different water environments is one of the priority tasks of all countries in the world [11,12]. The most important reason for this priority is that Pb is one of the most stable and toxic ions in various aquatic ecosystems. Table 1 shows some specific features, sources, and permissible limit values of Pb on an international scale [13,14,15].
For years, a wide variety of treatment methods have been applied to remove heavy metals from receiving environments; for example, electrochemical processes [16], chemical precipitation and coagulation [17], filtration method (membrane systems) [18,19], ion exchange [20,21], and adsorption [22,23]. Due to the disadvantages such as yield variability, high cost, large area requirement in these treatment processes, adsorption, which is a physico-chemical increase method, comes to the fore with advantages such as easy applicability, low cost, and adsorbent regeneration [24]. Many types of adsorbent/biosorbent (microbial biomass, seaweeds, waste sludge, agricultural wastes, natural wastes, natural minerals, water-based wastes) have been applied to remove Pb from aqueous solutions [25].
The most important detail that draws attention both in the research in the literature and in our own studies is that very high removal efficiencies of lead ions can be obtained with many different inorganic and organic adsorbents. Such high removal efficiencies cannot be obtained for other heavy metals and metalloids. Therefore, in this study, it was aimed to reveal the physico-chemical and biological properties of lead ion and the effects of specific properties such as amphoteric structure, free electron, post-transition metal, and low melting temperature on the adsorption process of lead in order to reveal the difference in the adsorption process of lead.

2. Materials and Methods

Web of Science Core Collection; Science Direct, Springer, Wiley, Taylor & Francois, Scopus(Clarivate Analytics®, Boston, USA) andGoogle Scholar(Googleplex, Mountain View, California, United States) were the databases used in this study. Bibliometric analysis was performed based on these databases.
First, a general search was performed using the keywords “lead adsorption/biosorption”, “adsorbent/biosorbent effect”, andhigh ad-sorption efficiencies” in the basic search tool. For this research, the search has been narrowed down to specific terms. In this context, the keywords “free electron”, “amfoter structure”, “Liquid Metal”, “low melting temperature”, “weak metal”, “post-transition metal” were researched to cover the last 4 years. Forty articles were evaluated according to the field of interest of this research. In addition, the applications, including the adsorption processes related to Pb purification, which were undertaken before in the study, were carried out according to international experimental procedures [26,27,28].

3. Results

The most important detail that draws attention both in the research in the literature and in our own studies is that very high removal efficiencies of lead ions can be obtained with many different inorganic and organic adsorbents. This situation is associated with some properties and factors specific to Pb.

3.1. Low Melting Liquid Metal State

Low melting point metals and post-transition metal alloys are materials with admirable properties that are described as “liquid metals” in the literature. Some specific properties of liquid metals (fluidity, flexibility, conductivity, alloying potential) are properties that do not coexist in other metals and materials. Due to these interesting properties, these metals are used in many sectors [29,30]. Mercury (Hg), gallium (Ga), rubidium (Rb), cesium (Cs), and francium (Fr) are included in this group because liquid metals are typically in liquid form at ≤23 ± 2 °C (room temperature) levels [31]. In order to increase the access and application of liquid metals, which are limited in terms of both need and use today, the room temperature definition was increased to 330 °C and post-transition metals (indium, thallium, tin, lead (Pb), and bismuth) were added to this group (Figure 1) [32,33].
In terms of current needs and heavy metal pollution removal, post-transition metals (especially Pb) have different electron arrangement for metallic bonding than other metal species. This increases the polarizing ability and promotes the tendency to form covalent bonds. Electron state and liquid nature provide the ability for Pb to exhibit both metallic and non-metallic properties (surface stratification). Some non-simple properties of Pb and liquid metals are shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Post-Transition Metal and Electron Distribution

Post-transition metals are also called weak metals in the literature. Post-transition group metals are in the p block of the periodic table, and Pb is also in this group. This group, including Pb, is between metalloids and transition metals. At this point, they are denser than transition metals and less densely electro-positive than other metals (alkali and alkaline earth groups) [34,35]. The weak metals class includes aluminum, gallium, indium, tin, thallium, lead, and bismuth (see Figure 1c). As seen in Table 1, Pb is a blue-silver mixed post-transition metal with an atomic number of 82, an atomic mass of 207.19, and has four stable isotopes. Although the structure of Pb is surrounded by four open electrons, it usually takes +2 valence instead of +4 in different structures. The other two electrons can simply be ionized. The two-electron effect can be an effect factor in the adsorption process and other applications.

3.3. Amphoter/Amphoteric Structure

In the fields of Environment and Chemistry, amphoteric/amphoteric structure means that it can react with both acid and base. It means “Ampho: both”, and an amphoteric metal has a reversible effect like a base in an acid medium and an acid in a basic medium [36,37]. The Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory also confirms this. In other words, they are amphiprotic molecules that can donate or accept a proton (H+). Amphoteric oxides consist of metal groups. Many metals (such as zinc, tin, lead, aluminum, and beryllium) have the potential to form amphoteric oxides or hydroxides. In terms of Pb, the amphoteric effect may play a key role in the adsorption/biosorption processes according to the adsorbent structure.
PbO + 2HCl → PbCl2 + H2O
PbO + 2NaOH + H2O → Na2[Pb(OH)4]

3.4. Adsorption/Biosorption Pre-Treatment Studies

Among the many treatment methods, adsorption is an inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and efficient process for removing Pb ions from water contaminated with lead ions. The most important detail that draws attention both in the research in the literature and in the laboratory-scale pretreatment studies we have performed is that very high removal efficiencies of Pb ions can be obtained with many different inorganic/organic adsorbents and biosorbents (see Figure 2). In this case, as we mentioned in the conclusion section, it is due to some specific properties and the adsorbent/biosorbent structures (surface analysis, pore distributions) used [15,38,39,40].

4. Discussion

Adsorption and biosorption processes are methods that allow for the use of different sorbents, and they are especially used in the purification of heavy metals from the aquatic ecosystem. Pb is also successfully removed from receiving water environments by these methods. The interesting point is that the removal of Pb with each sorbent is high compared to other metals. It can be said that this depends on some specific factors or situations. We can list them as follows:
  • Active components (pectin, catechin, lignin, etc.) in the structures of adsorbents and biosorbents and functional groups (carboxyl:-O, amines: -NH, and hydroxyl: -OH) of these sorbents can show a strong interaction with Pb.
  • The amphoteric/amphoteric nature of Pb may increase the removal rate.
  • Another factor is that some of the physical properties of Pb (high density, molecular weight, etc.) are different from those of other metals.
  • Being in the liquid metal group free two electron distribution can affect the adhesion to the surface of the sorbents in the adsorption mechanism.
  • The nature of the sorbents, their amphoteric properties, and the modification stages explain the bonding and sorption mechanisms of Pb.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, H.Ç., T.B., İ.Ş. and Ş.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out in Aksaray University Central Library and Engineering Faculty Environmental Engineering Department.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: Environmental persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bhunia, P. Environmental toxicants and hazardous contaminants: Recent advances in technologies for sustainable development. J. Hazard. Toxic. Radioact. Waste 2017, 21, 02017001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alengebawy, A.; Abdelkhalek, S.T.; Qureshi, S.R.; Wang, M.-Q. Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: Ecological risks and human health implications. Toxics 2021, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rezaei, M.; Pourang, N.; Moradi, A.M. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions using three biosorbents of aquatic origin with the emphasis on the affective factors. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xie, Y.; Yuan, X.; Wu, Z.; Zeng, G.; Jiang, L.; Peng, X.; Li, H. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of Mg/Fe layered double hy-droxide with Fe3O4-carbon spheres on the removal of Pb (II) and Cu (II). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 536, 440–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yousef, R.; Qiblawey, H.; El-Naas, M.H. Adsorption as a process for produced water treatment: A review. Processes 2020, 8, 1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qasem, N.A.A.; Mohammed, R.H.; Lawal, D.U. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: A comprehensive and critical review. Npj Clean Water 2021, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qu, J.; Meng, Q.; Lin, X.; Han, W.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, L.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y. Microwave-assisted synthesis of betacyclodextrin functionalized celluloses for enhanced removal of Pb (II) from water: Adsorptive performance and mechanism exploration. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 752, 141854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, L.; Lei, T.; Ren, Z.; Jiang, X.; Yang, X.; Bai, H.; Wang, S. Fe3O4@PDA@MnO2 core-shell nanocomposites for sensitive elec-trochemical detection of trace Pb (II) in water. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 864, 114065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Li, N.; Tao, J.; Yan, B.; Cui, X.; Chen, G. Adsorption of lead from aqueous solution by biochar: A review. Clean Technol. 2022, 4, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dai, K.; Liu, G.; Xu, W.; Deng, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, Z. Judicious fabrication of bifunctionalized graphene oxide/MnFe2O4 magnetic nanohybrids for enhanced removal of Pb (II) from water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 579, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Awual, M.R.; Hasan, M.M.; Islam, A.; Rahman, M.M.; Asiri, A.M.; Khaleque, M.A.; Sheikh, M.C. Offering an innovative composited material for effective lead (II) monitoring and removal from polluted water. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, H.; Ma, X.; Wei, Z.; Tan, Y.; Chen, S.; Ye, T.; Yuan, M.; Yu, J.; Wu, X.; Yin, F.; et al. Behavior and mechanism of the adsorption of lead by an eco-friendly porous double-network hydrogel derived from keratin. Chemosphere 2022, 289, 133086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Çelebi, H.; Bahadır, T.; ¸Simsek, İ.; Tulun, Ş. An environmental and green process for Pb2+ pollution: An experimental research from the perspective of adsorption. Eng. Proc. 2022, 19, 20. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mohanakrishna, G.; Al-Raoush, R.I.; Abu-Reesh, I.M. Integrating electrochemical and bioelectrochemical systems for energetically sustainable treatment of produced water. Fuel 2021, 28, 119104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rodriguez, A.Z.; Wang, H.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, P. Treatment of produced water in the Permian basin for hydraulic fracturing: Comparison of different coagulation processes and innovative filter media. Water 2020, 12, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Huang, L.; Wu, B.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, T.; Alhassan, S.I.; Yang, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L. Porous and flexible membrane derived from ZIF-8-decorated hyphae for outstanding adsorption of Pb2+ ion. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 565, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kárászová, M.; Bourassi, M.; Gaálová, J. Membrane removal of emerging contaminants from water: Which kind of membranes should we use? Membranes 2020, 10, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goyal, P.; Tiwary, C.S.; Misra, S.K. Ion exchange based approach for rapid and selective Pb (II) removal using iron oxide dec-orated metal organic framework hybrid. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 277, 111469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vaudevire, E.; Radmanesh, F.; Kolkman, A.; Vughs, D.; Cornelissen, E.; Post, J.; van der Meer, W. Fate and removal of trace pollutants from an anion exchange spent brine during the recovery process of natural organic matter and salts. Water Res. 2019, 154, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hameed, A.; Hameed, B.H.; Almomani, F.A.; Usman, M.; Ba-Abbad, M.M.; Khraisheh, M. Dynamic simulation of lead(II) metal adsorption from water on activated carbons in a packed-bed column. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kuganathan, N.; Anurakavan, S.; Abiman, P.; Iyngaran, P.; Gkanas, E.I.; Chroneos, A. Adsorption of lead on the surfaces of pristine and B, Si and N-doped graphene. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2020, 600, 412639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vo, T.S.; Hossain, M.M.; Jeong, H.M.; Kim, K. Heavy metal removal applications using adsorptive membranes. Nano Converg. 2020, 7, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Okoro, H.K.; Pandey, S.; Ogunkunle, C.O.; Ngila, C.J.; Zvinowanda, C.; Jimoh, I.; Lawal, I.A.; Orosun, M.M.; Adeniyi, A.G. Nanomaterial-based biosorbents: Adsorbent for efficient removal of selected organic pollutants from industrial wastewater. Emerg. Contam. 2022, 8, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gök, G.; Kocyigit, H.; Gök, O.; Celebi, H. The use of raw shrimp shells in the adsorption of highly polluted waters with Co2+ Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 186, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kayranli, B.; Gok, O.; Yilmaz, T.; Gok, G.; Celebi, H.; Seckin, I.Y.; Mesutoglu, O.C. Low-cost organic adsorbent usage for removing Ni2+ and Pb2+ from aqueous solution and adsorption mechanisms. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2022, 19, 3547–3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tulun, Ş.; Akgül, G.; Alver, A.; Çelebi, H. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference system modelling for chlorpyrifos removal with walnut shell biochar. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, X.; Cui, B.; Yuan, B.; Wang, X.; Fan, L.; Yu, D.; He, Z.; Sheng, L.; Liu, J.; Lu, J. Liquid metal microparticles phase change medicated mechanical destruction for enhanced tumor cryoablation and dual-mode imaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yun, G.; Tang, S.-Y.; Sun, S.; Yuan, D.; Zhao, Q.; Deng, L.; Yan, S.; Du, H.; Dickey, M.D.; Li, W. Liquid metal-filled magnetorheological elastomer with positive piezoconductivity. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Tang, J.; Daeneke, T.; O’Mullane, A.P.; Stewart, L.A.; Liu, J.; Majidi, C.; Ruoff, R.S.; Weiss, P.S.; Dickey, M.D. Emergence of liquid metals in nanotechnology. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 7388–7395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Rahim, M.A.; Tang, J. Low melting temperature liquid metals and their impacts on physical chemicstry. Acc. Mater. Res. 2021, 2, 8–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Daeneke, T.; Khoshmanesh, K.; Mahmood, N.; de Castro, I.A.; Esrafilzadeh, D.; Barrow, S.J.; Dickey, M.D.; Kalantar-zadeh, K. Liquid metals: Fundamentals and applications in chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 4073–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dong, J.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, M. Liquid Metal-Based Devices: Material Properties, Fabrication and Functionalities. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, M.; Yao, S.; Rao, W.; Liu, J. Transformable soft liquid metal micro/nanomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2019, 138, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sharma, D.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, P. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of amphoteric galactomannan derivative for the mitigation of malachite green and congo red dye from aqueous solution. Cellulose 2022, 29, 1035–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Noohi, Z.; Nosouhian, S.; Niroumand, B.; Timelli, G. Use of kow melting point metals and alloys (Tm < 420 °C) as phase change materials: A review. Metals 2022, 12, 945. [Google Scholar]
  38. Çelebi, H.; Gök, G.; Gök, O. Adsorption capability of brewed tea waste in waters containing toxic lead(II), cadmium (II), nickel (II), and zinc(II) heavy metal ions. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gök, G.; Çelebi, H. Laboratory scale elimination of some heavy metals with hollow aluminosilicate spheres. Int. J. Ecosys. Eco. Sci. 2019, 9, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Çelebi, H.; Gök, O. Evaluation of lead adsorption kinetics and isotherms from aqueous solution using natural walnut shell. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2017, 11, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Bubble dispersions of liquid metals (such as surface layering, alloy formation) (b) Liquid metal potential: internal and external factors and possible reactions; (c) Post-transition metals (blue) in the periodic table and those considered as post-transition metals (gray and light orange) (adapted from [32]).
Figure 1. (a) Bubble dispersions of liquid metals (such as surface layering, alloy formation) (b) Liquid metal potential: internal and external factors and possible reactions; (c) Post-transition metals (blue) in the periodic table and those considered as post-transition metals (gray and light orange) (adapted from [32]).
Engproc 31 00017 g001
Figure 2. Pre-treatment values for Pb made with different adsorbents/biosorbents.
Figure 2. Pre-treatment values for Pb made with different adsorbents/biosorbents.
Engproc 31 00017 g002
Table 1. Specific properties, sources, and international limits of Pb [13,14,15].
Table 1. Specific properties, sources, and international limits of Pb [13,14,15].
Permissible Limits
WHOUSEPAEPA
0.01 mg/L0.01 mg/L0.015 mg/L
Properties
DensityAtomic WeightHeat of fusionHeat Capacity
11.34 g/cm3207.2 g/mol4.77 kJ/mol0.13 J/g K
Electron affinityBoiling pointMelting Point
35.1 kJ/mol1740 °C327.5 °C
Sources
Metal plating, Paint, Laundry process, Mining sector, Battery manufacturing, Steel industries, Alloys, Ceramics, Plastics, Glassware
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çelebi, H.; Bahadir, T.; Şimşek, İ.; Tulun, Ş. Reasons for High Adsorption Efficiencies in Lead Removal from Aquatic Solution. Eng. Proc. 2023, 31, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13812

AMA Style

Çelebi H, Bahadir T, Şimşek İ, Tulun Ş. Reasons for High Adsorption Efficiencies in Lead Removal from Aquatic Solution. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 31(1):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çelebi, Hakan, Tolga Bahadir, İsmail Şimşek, and Şevket Tulun. 2023. "Reasons for High Adsorption Efficiencies in Lead Removal from Aquatic Solution" Engineering Proceedings 31, no. 1: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13812

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop