Next Article in Journal
A Joint Optimization of Maintenance and Scheduling for Unrelated Parallel Machine Problem Based on Hybrid Discrete Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study of Steam–Water Direct Contact Condensation in a Horizontal Pipe Geometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Modeling and Simulation of Traditional Single U-Tube Model and Similar Scaled Model of Underground Storage System Based on Similar Scale Function †

1
Mechanical Engineering Department, NFC Institute of Engineering and Technology, Multan 60650, Pakistan
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (Narowal Campus), Narowal 51750, Pakistan
4
Biomedical Engineering Department, NFC Institute of Engineering and Technology, Multan 60650, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering (ICAME-22), Islamabad, Pakistan, 25 August 2022.
Eng. Proc. 2022, 23(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023023
Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering)

Abstract

:
Seasonal thermal energy storage is mostly used to make solar energy more consistent. There are very few research studies available on thermal energy storage mechanisms due to their large size requirements and high computational power. The current research study aims to compare the similar single-tube CFD model with simulation results of the original single-tube model using similarity theory. The temperature field changes before and after the similarity processing of the model are obtained, and the two are compared, so that the accuracy of the similarity functions’ relationship can be verified.

1. Introduction

American researchers [1,2] proposed the idea to store heat in soil in the 1960s, and Nordic researchers started work to develop a seasonal heat storage mechanism in the 1980s. At the beginning of the study [3], long-term soil heat storage was only applied in large-scale solar central heating systems or district heating systems. Yumrutas et al. [4] studied a solar-based heating system equipped with a tank containing hot water to analyze the impact of climatic conditions on the operating system. In 1997, Inalli [5] analyzed and discussed solar thermal storage systems with soil regenerative subsystems through computational and modeling simulations. They simulated and predicted soil storage temperatures and collector plates.
In order to perform a complete analysis, Richard A. Beier et al. [6] developed an 18 m-long sandbox test bench. A thermal response test was conducted to investigate various thermal parameters. Sakellariou and Ratchawang et al. [7,8] showed that the long-term storage of solar energy in the heat storage system is relatively more technical and economical, and its operating efficiency is ideal. Z. Abbas et al. [9,10] performed a research study to store cold energy using borehole heat exchangers to fulfill seasonal cooling and heating applications inside domestic and commercial buildings using a similar-scale model. The major issues in performing the research on thermal energy storage include the large storage volume for experimental setup, high computing power, and accuracy of obtained results. Thus, current research work aims to implement the concept of similarity theory to develop a similar-scale model of a soil heat storage mechanism. After establishing an actual-size soil heat storage model and a similar-size model of a single tube, simulations are performed using Ansys Fluent. The temperature field changes before and after the similar processing of the model are obtained, and the two are compared so that the correctness of the similarity function relationship can be verified. The proposed research work aims to establish an accurate relationship between the actual-size model and the similar-size model based on the similar function relationship.

2. Research Methodology

2.1. CFD Foundation

Methods for studying flow problems generally include traditional experimental measurement methods, theoretical analysis methods, and CFD numerical simulation methods. The above three methods can be regarded as a complete set of research method systems. The results obtained by the experimental test method are the basis for the other two methods. However, the construction and measurement of experimental systems are often limited by various practical operations. In the current research study, AnsysFluent simulation software is used to import the fluid flow file. Firstly, single-tube models of actual size and similar size are established. Then, the two single-tube models are used to simulate simple working conditions, and the obtained temperature field distribution is completely consistent, which verifies the correctness of the derived similar function relationship.

2.2. Establishment of a Single-Tube Model

The parameters of the actual-size model and similar-scale-based model are given in Table 1. This paper determines the similar-scale factor as 20 [10]. The surface boundary is set to a constant temperature boundary, and the hourly temperature change data are imported through a user-defined function (UDF).

3. Results

Solving Single-Tube Model

The similar-size model and actual model are solved according to the above model size design and operation parameter settings. After the solution, of the obtained results of both models are analyzed from the temperature field distribution and the temperature curve distribution. The cloud map of the temperature field distribution is shown in Figure 1. It can be seen from the temperature field distribution diagram that although the calculated number of steps and duration are different for the two models, the obtained temperature field distribution is basically the same. In order to more clearly compare the temperature fields of the two models, this paper takes a line at the depth of the middle of the model, which is located in the middle of the model and runs horizontally through the model. The temperature data on the line are taken out, and the temperature distribution curve can be drawn, as shown in Figure 2.
In Figure 2, the horizontal axis at the top represents the position coordinates in the similar-scale model, and the corresponding red dotted line is the temperature distribution; the horizontal axis at the bottom shows the position coordinates in the actual-size model, the corresponding black dotted line is the temperature distribution in the actual-size model. It can be seen from the figure that although the two models are different in spatial scale and the calculated steps and duration are different, the soil temperature distribution calculated by the two models is the same, which fully proves the accuracy of the proposed data.

4. Conclusions

In this research work, the CFD traditional model and similar model of a soil thermal storage system are established for a single tube, and the analysis and verification are carried out step by step. The specific content and conclusions are: Firstly, single-tube models of actual size and similar size are established. Then, the two single-tube models are used to simulate simple working conditions, and the obtained temperature field distribution is completely consistent, which verifies the correctness of the derived similar function relationship. It can be considered that the proposed modeling method can be implemented for a tube group model using complex conditions, and can save a large amount of required computational power.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.A.; methodology, Z.A. and S.A.; software, Z.A. and D.C.; validation, Z.A., S.A., and M.W.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.A. and M.W.K.; writing—review and editing, Z.A., S.A., D.C., and M.W.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China and NFC IET Multan, Pakistan for providing the opportunity to finish this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mazzarella, L.; Pedrocchi, E. Monitoring a Solar-Assisted Heat Pump with Seasonal Ground Coupled Storage: Analysis of the First Results. In Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Brussels, Belgium, 5–6 November 1986; pp. 199–209. [Google Scholar]
  2. van den Brink, G.J.; Hoogendoorn, C.J. Ground Water Flow Heat Losses for Seasonal Heat Storage in the Soil. Sol. Energy 1983, 30, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peltola, S.S.; Lund, P.D. Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Modeling Approaches for Sizing of Seasonal Storage Solar Heating Systems. Sol. Energy 1992, 48, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yumrutas, R.; Kaska, Ö. Experimental Investigation of Thermal Performance of a Solar Assisted Heat Pump System with an Energy Storage. Int. J. Energy Res. 2004, 28, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Inalli, M.; Ünsal, M.; Tanyildizi, V. A Computational Model of a Domestic Solar Heating System with Underground Spherical Thermal Storage. Energy 1997, 22, 1163–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beier, R.A.; Smith, M.D.; Spitler, J.D. Reference Data Sets for Vertical Borehole Ground Heat Exchanger Models and Thermal Response Test Analysis. Geothermics 2011, 40, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sakellariou, E.; Axaopoulos, P.; Wright, A. Energy and Economic Evaluation of a Solar Assisted Ground Source Heat Pump System for a North Mediterranean City. Energy Build 2020, 231, 110640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ratchawang, S.; Chotpantarat, S.; Chokchai, S.; Takashima, I.; Uchida, Y.; Charusiri, P. A Review of Ground Source Heat Pump Application for Space Cooling in Southeast Asia. Energies 2022, 15, 4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abbas, Z.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Yong, L.; Wang, R.Z. Experimental Investigation of Underground Seasonal Cold Energy Storage Using Borehole Heat Exchangers Based on Laboratory Scale Sandbox. Geothermics 2020, 87, 101837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abbas, Z.; Yong, L.; Abbas, S.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, R.Z. Performance Analysis of Seasonal Soil Heat Storage System Based on Numerical Simulation and Experimental Investigation. Renew Energy 2021, 178, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of temperature field distribution (a,b) in single-tube model.
Figure 1. Comparison of temperature field distribution (a,b) in single-tube model.
Engproc 23 00023 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of temperature curve distribution in single-tube model.
Figure 2. Comparison of temperature curve distribution in single-tube model.
Engproc 23 00023 g002
Table 1. Parameter settings in single-tube model.
Table 1. Parameter settings in single-tube model.
Model ParameterUnitActual SizeSimilar Size
Storage lengthm201
Storage widthm80.4
Buried tube lengthm160.8
Inlet water temperature°C4040
Inlet flow ratem/s0.510
Radial far boundary-1818
Surface boundary-air temperatureair temperature
Step sizeS1010
Step count-25,92065
Total lengthh720.18
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbas, Z.; Abbas, S.; Khalid, M.W.; Chen, D. Modeling and Simulation of Traditional Single U-Tube Model and Similar Scaled Model of Underground Storage System Based on Similar Scale Function. Eng. Proc. 2022, 23, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023023

AMA Style

Abbas Z, Abbas S, Khalid MW, Chen D. Modeling and Simulation of Traditional Single U-Tube Model and Similar Scaled Model of Underground Storage System Based on Similar Scale Function. Engineering Proceedings. 2022; 23(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbas, Zulkarnain, Saqlain Abbas, Muhammad Waqas Khalid, and Dongwen Chen. 2022. "Modeling and Simulation of Traditional Single U-Tube Model and Similar Scaled Model of Underground Storage System Based on Similar Scale Function" Engineering Proceedings 23, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023023

APA Style

Abbas, Z., Abbas, S., Khalid, M. W., & Chen, D. (2022). Modeling and Simulation of Traditional Single U-Tube Model and Similar Scaled Model of Underground Storage System Based on Similar Scale Function. Engineering Proceedings, 23(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop