Next Article in Journal
Hilbert Fractal PIFA Antenna for DCS, PCS, UMTS and WiMAX Wireless Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Sequencing and Merging Procedures at Three European Airports Using Opensky Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Frequency Control System Effectiveness in a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Plant †

Laboratory Signals and Systems (LSS), IGEE, University M’hamed Bougara Boumerdes (UMBB), Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Conference on Computational Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Online, 10–12 December 2021.
Eng. Proc. 2022, 14(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022014001
Published: 24 January 2022

Abstract

:
Combined cycle gas turbines (CCGTs) have considerable merits and are mainly the most frequently researched topics in power generation, due to their attractive performance characteristics and low-emission combustion system. A change in power demands throughout a power system is reflected by a change in the frequency in the network. Therefore, a significant loss in a power system without a suitable control system can cause an extreme frequency disturbance in the network. However, it has been observed that many research studies have focused on control issues and voltage stability, contrary to frequency control, which receives less interest in this field. Considering these remarks, our contribution deals with the frequency control system. This study focuses on the effectiveness of the frequency control system in a combined cycle gas turbine plant. Thus, a dynamic model for a CCGT plant has been developed in MATLAB/Simulink, and the power system responses are examined following the frequency deviation.

1. Introduction

Combined cycle gas turbines (CCGTs) are widely used because they can reach a higher efficiency by producing a great amount of electrical power with low carbon dioxide emissions, compared with conventional plants [1,2]. Nowadays, there is an increasing interest in combined cycle gas turbines, especially in countries endowed with huge natural gas resources [3].
Operating power systems have become more complex than traditional systems, due to the great interconnection and presence of new technical equipment. Thus, in a generation power plant, there is more than one generating unit providing power into the system. Generator speed is significant for power generation plant performance, as it is widely dependent on the performance of the fuel system, the feed water, the combustion system, and the air flow system [4]. For satisfactory operation of this system, the frequency should be kept practically constant.
Depending on the frequency deviation, the frequency control system provides local and automatic frequency control by adjusting the speed governor within a few seconds after a disturbance, in order to maintain the stability of the power system [5]. The speed variation and frequency transient have a direct effect on the air flow and fuel flow supply, since the air compressor and the fuel system are both attached to the shaft of the unit (CIGRE, 2003) [6,7,8]. Therefore, it is necessary to involve a suitable frequency control system, in such power plant.
This study is based on the dynamic model of a CCGT, proposed by Kakimoto and Baba (2003) [5], which was inspired by Rowen (1983) [9]. Our contribution focuses on the governing control system. The simulation model of the system was developed in MATLAB/Simulink, and the impact of the load variation and the damping change on the CCGT plant was examined.

2. Combined Cycle Process

In a CCGT, the gas turbine provides two-thirds of the total unit power output and the steam turbine provides the other third. Practically, the overall thermal efficiency of the power plant, in a combined cycle system, increases from 37% to 57–61% [3,8]. In a CCGT, air is compressed isentropically in the compressor before being fed into a combustion chamber, where fuel is added and burned. The energy of the expanding air is then converted into mechanical work in a turbine [10]. The gases exhausted from the gas turbine are used to drive a steam turbine, by transmitting these gases through the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). This process is the basis of a combined cycle gas turbine plant. The mechanical power produced by the steam turbine is converted into electrical power by the generator.

3. Mathematical Modeling of the Combined Cycle Gas Turbine

The thermodynamic process of the gas and steam turbine is modeled using algebraic equations (Spalding and Cole, 1973), consistent with adiabatic compression and expansion, as well as with the heat exchange in the HRSG [6,8]. It is assumed that the mixture of air and gas is almost equal to the air flow. The ratio of the input–output temperatures for the isentropic compression is given as follows [6,8]:
x = ( P r 0   W ) γ 1 γ  
where
γ : The ratio of specific heat;
Pr: The actual compressor ratio (for nominal airflow (W = 1 pu), Pr = Pr0).
However, the compressor discharge temperature (td) and the gas turbine exhaust temperature (te) can be written, respectively, as:
t d = t i ( 1 + x 1 η c )
t e = t f   [ 1 ( 1 1 x ) η t ]
where
ti: The ambient temperature;
tf: The gas turbine inlet temperature.
η c and η t are, respectively, the compressor and turbine efficiency.
The mechanical output power produced by the gas turbine is given by:
E g = K 0   [   ( t f   t e   ) ( t d   t i   ) ]   W
The mechanical output power produced by the steam turbine is given by:
E s = K 1   t e   W
In a steady state and for initialization purposes, the generation output power of the plant is given by:
P = E g + E s  
The inlet temperature (Tf) and exhaust temperature (Te) (note that for normalized conditions Tf = Te = 1 (pu)) are:
T f = t f 273 t f 0  
T e = t e 273 t e 0

4. Frequency Falls Effect on the CCGT

It is known that various power grid blackouts are caused by the imbalance in frequency control requirements [7,11]. The falling system frequency has several effects on the CCGT plant. One of them is expressed in the inertia response. This response, alongside with the load response, is important to the power system in damping the initial frequency fall [3]. Another effect of droop frequency is a fall in the compressor speed, which leads to a drop in the pressure and a reduction in the airflow, which means an increase in fuel consumption and a rise in temperature [7,12]. At this time, the temperature controller will actually reduce the fuel demand; consequently, the output power of the gas turbine decreases.

5. Power System Frequency Control

Since the frequency network is proportional to the generator speed, frequency control may be achieved by regulating the rotor speed of the generator. This is assumed by the speed governing control system which is installed in order to adjust the output power and regulate the speed and the frequency deviation [13]. Depending on the sign of the frequency deviation, the frequency control action is expected to start automatically and immediately provide power support by increasing or decreasing the active power output [11].

5.1. Load Response to the Frequency Deviation

The generator speed variations lead to a change in the power output and incite a frequency imbalance [4]. The dependency of the speed (frequency) on the load may be expressed as:
Δ P e = Δ P L + D   Δ w r
where
Δ P L : load change;
Δ w r : speed deviation;
D : load damping constant.
The damping constant is expressed as a percent change in load for one percent change in frequency [4]. When more than one generator is operating in parallel, the output power of each unit can only be varied by adjusting its load reference, which directly affects the speed variation. The loads are lumped into an equivalent single damping constant, ‘D’, and the equivalent generator has an equivalent inertia constant of Meq [4]. The equivalent generator speed represents the frequency, and in per unit (pu), the two are equal ( Δ w r = Δ f ) (Figure 1).

5.2. Turbine Governing Systems Response

It is assumed that the frequency is the same at all times and at all points in the network. Regardless of the location of the load change, all producing units for speed governance will contribute to the global change in generation [4]. Therefore, we consider only a single inertia value, which gathers all the inertia of the individual units. This is done by summing the individual kinetic energies into a single generation kinetic energy value [4]. The speed governing process developed by Kundur [4], shown in Figure 2 is applied in this study.

6. Simulation Model of CCGT

The dynamic model of the combined cycle gas turbine plant consists of power generation units and their control system. In this study, the combined cycle system is constituted by two turbines (gas turbine and steam turbine) and one generator unit. The model is based on the simplified transfer function of gas and steam turbines and eventually the control system, which is planned as follows:
The first loop consists of the speed governor (load frequency control), which is necessary for the stability of the system. It detects frequency anomalies and regulates the fuel request signal.
The fuel control is directly related to the rotor speed. The rotor speed and frequency have a direct influence on air and fuel consumption [3].
The temperature control loop has a significant role in the operating system of the power plant, as it adjusts the fuel flow (Wf) and airflow (W) based on measurements of the exhaust temperature, by adjusting the fuel demand when the frequency falls and the output power decreases [2].
The selection of the control loops (frequency or overheat) is achieved using the low-value-select (LVS) by switching the lower value (Tc or Fd).
The simulation model is shown in Figure 3, and the parameters are cited in Appendix A.

7. Simulation Results and Discussion

The effect of the damping constant on the system dynamic is shown in Figure 4. In the transient state, it can be seen that the frequency drop decreases with the increase in damping constant “D”. In the steady state, the output power and frequency remain at their nominal values. It is noted that a value of D = 2 means that a 1% change in frequency would cause a 2% change in load [4].
In Figure 5, it can be seen that the output power and frequency deviation decrease as the load change is lower, which means that the system control adjusts the output power generation according to the load change. When the frequency deviation is slight (Δf = −0.09 Hz), the frequency takes less time to return to its nominal value compared to the case of an overload change, where the frequency drop is about Δf = −0.51 Hz. It can be noted that the steady state depends on this change. In this phase, for lower load changes, the output power is less than its nominal value and the frequency deviation is very slight, but in a positive sense (Δf = +0.005 to Δf = +0.01 Hz). For the overload change, the output power is greater than its nominal value and the frequency deviation still falls (Δf = −0.13 Hz).
Figure 6 illustrates that, for a step change in load at t = 0 s, the frequency drops in the transient time and then remains at its nominal value (no frequency deviation, Δf = 0 Hz). At time t = 50 s, a step load is applied to the system. When there is no load, the frequency deviation reaches Δf = + 0.2 Hz; at t = 50 s it falls to Δf = −0.03 Hz. After that, the frequency returns to its nominal value, as does the output power, during the steady state.

8. Conclusions

The dynamic responses to load and damping changes, which are expressed by a change in frequency, are presented in this paper. Depending on the speed deviation characteristics and the frequency sensitivity to the load change, the action of the speed governor control results in a steady-state frequency deviation. The output power of the CCGT remains at more or less its rated value, until the frequency of the system returns to its nominal value. As the frequency depends on the output power, the frequency should remain nearly constant in order to maintain the speed generator at its rated value. Consequently, the reliability and effectiveness of the frequency control system is necessary for the stability of power system generation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, D.T.; visualization and supervision, H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Simulation parameters used in this study [8].
Table A1. Simulation parameters used in this study [8].
SymbolDescriptionValue
t i Compressor inlet temperature30 °C
t d 0 Compressor discharge temperature390 °C
t f 0 Gas turbine inlet temperature1085 °C
t e 0 Gas turbine exhaust temperature535 °C
P r 0 Compressor pressure ratio11.5
γ Ratio of specific heat1.4
η c Compressor efficiency0.85
η t Turbine efficiency0.85
RSpeed Regulation0.04
T t Temperature control integration rate0.469
T c   m a x Temperature control upper limit1.1
T c   m i n Temperature control lower limit0
F d   m a x Fuel control upper limit1.5
F d   m i n Fuel control lower limit0
T v Valve positioner time constant0.05
T f u Fuel system time constant0.4
T w Air control time constant0.4669
T c d Compressor volume time con-stant0.2
K 0 Gas turbine output coefficient0.0033
K 1 Steam turbine output coefficient0.00043
T g Governor time constant0.05
K 4 Gain of radiation shield (instantaneous)0.8
K 5 Gain of radiation shield0.2
T 3 Radiation shield time constant15
T 4 Thermocouple time constant2.5
T 5 Temperature control time constant3.3
K 3 Ratio of fuel adjustment0.77
K 6 Fuel valve lower limit0.23
T m Time constant heat capacitance of waste heat recovery boiler5
T b Boiler storage time constant20
T i Turbine rotor time constant18.5

References

  1. Raja, A.J.; Christober Asir, R.B.D.; Thiagarajan, C.C.Y. Frequency Excursion and Temperature control of Combined Cycle Gas Plant Including SMES. Int. J. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2010, 2, 1793–8163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Talah, D.; Bentarzi, H. Ambient Temperature Effect on the Performance of Gas Turbine in the Combined Cycle Power Plant. Algerian J. Env. Sci. Technol. 2021. Available online: https://www.aljest.net/index.php/aljest/article/view/513 (accessed on 17 January 2022).
  3. Spath, P.L.; Mann, M.K. Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Generation System; National Renewable Energy Lab.: Golden, CO, USA, 2000.
  4. Kundur, P. Control of Active Power and Reactive Power. Power System Stability and Control; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 581–601. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kakimoto, N.; Baba, K. Performance of Gas Turbine-Based Plants During Frequency Drops. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2003, 18, 1110–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mantzaris, J.; Vournas, C. Modelling and Stability of a Single-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant. Int. J. Thermodyn. 2007, 10, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lalor, G.; O’Malley, M. Frequency Control on an Island Power System with Increasing Proportions Combined Cycle Gas Turbines. In Proceedings of the IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference, Bologna, Italy, 23–26 June 2003. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rai, J.N.; Naimul Hasan, A.B.B.; Garai, R.; Rahul Kapoor, I. Performance Analysis of CCGT Power Plant using MATLAB/Simulink Based Simulation. Int. J. Adv. Res. Technol. 2013, 2, 285–290. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rowen, W.I. Simplified Mathematical Representation of Heavy Duty Gas Turbines. J. Power 1983, 105, 865–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lindsley, D. Power Plant Control and Instrumentation; The Institution of Electrical Engineers: London, UK, 2005; pp. 10, 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gezer, D.; Taşcıoğlu, Y.; Çelebioğlu, K. Frequency Containment Control of Hydropower Plants Using Different Adaptive Methods. Energies 2021, 14, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lalor, G.; Ritchie, J.; Flynn, D.; O’Malley, M. The Impact of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Short-Term Dynamics on Frequency Control. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2005, 20, 1456–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bevrani, H. Robust Power System Frequency Control, 2nd ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 23–26. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Generating units’ power output.
Figure 1. Generating units’ power output.
Engproc 14 00001 g001
Figure 2. Simplified block diagram of the governing system.
Figure 2. Simplified block diagram of the governing system.
Engproc 14 00001 g002
Figure 3. The simulation model used in this study.
Figure 3. The simulation model used in this study.
Engproc 14 00001 g003
Figure 4. The effect of the damping constant “D” on the system dynamic: (a) mechanical output power; (b) frequency deviation.
Figure 4. The effect of the damping constant “D” on the system dynamic: (a) mechanical output power; (b) frequency deviation.
Engproc 14 00001 g004
Figure 5. Load change effect on the system: (a) mechanical output power; (b) frequency deviation.
Figure 5. Load change effect on the system: (a) mechanical output power; (b) frequency deviation.
Engproc 14 00001 g005
Figure 6. Output power and frequency deviation for PL = 1: (a) step time = 0; (b) step time = 50 s.
Figure 6. Output power and frequency deviation for PL = 1: (a) step time = 0; (b) step time = 50 s.
Engproc 14 00001 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Talah, D.; Bentarzi, H. Frequency Control System Effectiveness in a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Plant. Eng. Proc. 2022, 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022014001

AMA Style

Talah D, Bentarzi H. Frequency Control System Effectiveness in a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Plant. Engineering Proceedings. 2022; 14(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022014001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Talah, Djamila, and Hamid Bentarzi. 2022. "Frequency Control System Effectiveness in a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Plant" Engineering Proceedings 14, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022014001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop