Utilization of Solar Panels in Various Applications: A Systematic Literature Review †
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Research Questions
- How does the use of solar panels in the transportation sector impact carbon emissions reduction and dependence on fossil fuels?The use of solar panels in the transportation sector significantly contributes to reducing carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuel [7]. Solar panels generate electricity without burning fossil fuels, minimizing carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions. Electric vehicles recharged using energy from solar panels provide an environmentally friendly solution compared to fossil fuel-powered vehicles. Furthermore, utilizing solar panels as a renewable energy source reduces the need for fuel imports and enhances energy independence. For instance, solar panels have been used on cars, trains, and electric charging stations to support sustainable transportation. Although challenges such as technological efficiency and initial investment costs remain, innovations continue to drive improvements in solar panel performance. With proper implementation, solar-powered transportation becomes a strategic step in mitigating climate change and decarbonizing the transportation sector.
- How has solar panel technology developed in various sectors (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and transportation) over the past decade?Over the past decade, solar panel technology has rapidly advanced across various sectors, from residential to transportation. In the residential sector, integrating energy storage systems using lithium-ion batteries allows households to store energy for use at night or during cloudy weather [8], improving energy resilience and cost efficiency. Additionally, the adoption of bifacial solar panels, which can capture light from both sides, has increased energy efficiency by 10–30% compared to traditional panels. In the commercial sector, office buildings increasingly adopt solar panels to support sustainability initiatives and reduce operational costs [9], either through on-grid systems connected to public power grids or off-grid systems with energy storage for greater resilience. At the industrial sector, large production facilities such as Tesla Gigafactory and companies like Tata Steel use solar panels to reduce their carbon footprint and energy costs [10]. especially in powering irrigation pumps in remote areas and sustainable agricultural technologies such as solar-powered cold storage, which minimizes post-harvest waste [11]. In the transportation sector, solar-powered electric vehicles are being developed, utilizing solar energy to extend vehicle range. Furthermore, solar-based charging stations have been implemented in several countries [12], to provide clean energy for electric vehicles. These developments demonstrate the significant potential of solar panels in supporting the transition to environmentally friendly energy across sectors.
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin-film solar panels?Monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin-film solar panels each have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Monocrystalline panels are known for their highest efficiency, around 18–22%, due to being made from highly pure single-crystal silicon [13], making them suitable for areas with limited space, although they are relatively more expensive. On the other hand, polycrystalline panels, made from fragments of silicon melted together, have lower efficiency, around 17% but are more affordable and environmentally friendly in their production compared to monocrystalline [14]. Meanwhile, thin-film panels, made from thin layers of photovoltaic materials like cadmium telluride or amorphous silicon, offer flexibility and lightweight properties, making them ideal for portable applications or rooftops that cannot support heavy loads [15]. However, thin-film panels have lower efficiency, only about 10–12%, and require larger areas to generate the same power output as other types. Additionally, thin-film panels generally have a shorter lifespan compared to monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels. By considering specific needs and conditions, selecting the appropriate type of solar panel can maximize efficiency and cost benefits.
3. Results
3.1. How Does the Use of Solar Panels in the Transportation Sector Impact Carbon Emissions Reduction and Dependence on Fossil Fuels?
3.1.1. Reduction of Carbon Emissions
- -
- Solar-powered vehicles can avoid up to 1.5 tons of CO2 emissions per year compared to conventional vehicles [17].
- -
- Moreover, solar-powered charging stations that support solar-based electric vehicles reduce reliance on electricity grids, which are often still dependent on fossil fuel energy sources. This further lowers the transportation sector’s carbon footprint.
3.1.2. Dependence on Fossil Fuels
- –
- Dependence on Fossil Fuels: A significant portion of the global transportation sector still relies on fossil fuels (gasoline and diesel) to power vehicles.
- –
- Solar Vehicles and Reduced Dependence: By using solar energy as the primary power source for vehicles, dependence on fossil fuels can be minimized. In solar-based electric vehicles, solar panels installed on the vehicle’s roof charge the battery directly, whether the vehicle is parked or in motion. This reduces the need for fossil fuels to generate electricity for charging electric vehicles.
3.2. How Has Solar Panel Technology Developed Across Various Sectors (Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Agricultural, and Transportation) over the Past Decade?
3.2.1. Residential Sector
- –
- The adoption of photovoltaic systems offers significant cost-saving potential for households. Annual savings range from USD 29.72 to USD 293.27 (10–100% of energy needs), demonstrating the economic benefits achievable, particularly for strata 2 and 3 consumers in Bogotá, Colombia [18].
- –
- Energy Storage Integration: Many households now complement solar panel systems with energy storage using lithium-ion batteries, such as Tesla Powerwall. These systems allow homes to store energy generated during the day for use at night or during cloudy weather, enhancing energy resilience and cost efficiency.
- –
- Bifacial Solar Panels: Bifacial solar panels, capable of capturing sunlight from both sides (front and back), have become increasingly popular in residential installations. These panels can produce 10–30% more energy than traditional monofacial solar panels [19].
3.2.2. Commercial Sector
- –
- Adoption in Office Buildings: Over the past decade, commercial buildings, particularly office towers, have increasingly adopted solar panels as part of sustainability initiatives and energy cost-saving measures.
- –
- On-Grid and Off-Grid Systems: Many commercial buildings now choose on-grid systems that connect solar panels to the public electricity grid [20]. This allows companies to send excess energy back to the grid and receive financial incentives. Meanwhile, buildings in remote areas or those requiring high energy resilience are adopting off-grid systems equipped with energy storage.
3.2.3. Industrial Sector
3.2.4. Agricultural Sector
- –
- Solar-Powered Irrigation: Solar technology has been widely used to power water pumps in irrigation systems, particularly in remote areas or regions without access to electricity grids. In India, more than 300,000 solar-powered pumps have been installed for agricultural irrigation, reducing dependence on expensive diesel fuel and air pollution [21].
- –
- Sustainable Farming Applications: Solar panels support sustainable farming by providing renewable energy for agricultural processing, such as grain drying and milk processing. Flexible solar technologies, like solar-powered cold storage, help preserve the freshness of produce and reduce post-harvest losses in rural areas.
3.2.5. Transportation Sector
- –
- Solar-Powered Electric Vehicles: Solar-powered electric vehicles have rapidly advanced over the past decade. Companies like Lightyear One and Sono Motors have launched electric cars equipped with solar panels to extend their driving range by utilizing solar energy directly. For instance, Lightyear One can add up to 12 km of range per day under sunny conditions.
- –
- Solar Charging Stations: In countries like Japan and Australia, solar-powered charging stations for electric vehicles have been introduced. These stations are equipped with solar panels to generate clean energy for charging electric vehicles.
3.3. What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline, and Thin-Film Solar Panels? (See Table 1)
3.3.1. Monocrystalline Solar Panels
- Advantages:
- –
- High Efficiency: Monocrystalline panels provide the highest energy efficiency, with a conversion rate of around 18% to 22%, depending on the quality and model. This means more energy can be generated from a smaller space.
- –
- Performance in Low Light: These panels perform better in low-light or cloudy conditions due to the efficient electron conduction of their single crystal.
- –
- Durable and Long-lasting: Monocrystalline panels have a long lifespan, with many lasting over 25 years while retaining more than 80% of their efficiency.
- Disadvantages:
- –
- Higher Cost: Monocrystalline panels are more expensive than polycrystalline and thin-film panels due to higher production costs and a more complex manufacturing process.
- –
- Material Waste: The manufacturing process involves cutting large silicon crystals, resulting in higher material wastage.
3.3.2. Polycrystalline Solar Panels
- Advantages:
- –
- Lower Cost: Polycrystalline panels are more affordable than monocrystalline panels because their production process is simpler and involves less material wastage.
- –
- Good Efficiency: With an efficiency range of 15% to 17%, they are suitable for large-scale applications.
- –
- Availability and Production Cost: They are widely available and faster to produce, making them a cost-effective option.
- Disadvantages:
- –
- Lower Efficiency: While efficient, polycrystalline panels require more space to produce the same amount of power as monocrystalline panels.
- –
- Performance at High Temperatures: Polycrystalline panels tend to experience a greater drop in efficiency in high-temperature conditions.
3.3.3. Thin-Film Solar Panels
- Advantages:
- –
- Lowest Cost: Thin-film panels are cheaper to produce compared to monocrystalline or polycrystalline panels due to their minimal material usage and simpler manufacturing process.
- –
- Lightweight and Flexible: These panels can be installed on flexible surfaces, such as curved roofs, clothing, or portable applications like backpacks.
- –
- Performance in Low Light: Certain types, particularly those using amorphous silicon or cadmium telluride, perform better under low-light or indirect lighting conditions.
- Disadvantages:
- –
- Low Efficiency: Thin-film panels have the lowest efficiency among the three types, ranging between 10% and 12%, requiring more area to generate the same amount of energy.
- –
- Durability and Lifespan: These panels tend to have a shorter lifespan and, in some cases, lose efficiency more quickly compared to monocrystalline or polycrystalline panels.
- –
- Performance at High Temperatures: While they perform well in low light, thin-film panels suffer significant efficiency losses in high-temperature environments.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cui, F. Research on Future Development and Challenges of New Energy. Adv. Econ. Manag. Polit. Sci. 2025, 162, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arvizu, D.; Balaya, P.; Cabeza, L.F.; Hollands, K.G.T.; Jäger-Waldau, A.; Kondo, M.; Konseibo, C.; Meleshko, V.; Stein, W.; Tamaura, Y.; et al. Direct Solar Energy. In Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 333–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barasa Kabeyi, M.J.; Olanrewaju, O.A. Solar Energy as a Sustainable Energy for Power Generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Melbourne, Australia, 14–16 November 2023; IEOM Society International: Southfield, MI, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayat, M.B.; Ali, D.; Monyake, K.C.; Alagha, L.; Ahmed, N. Solar energy—A look into power generation, challenges, and a solar-powered future. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 1049–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almoghira, G.; Hussein, A.A. A Review of Solar Energy Applications in Transportation Sector. In Proceedings of the 2024 6th International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT), Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia, 3–5 December 2024; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyvönen, J.; Santasalo-Aarnio, A.; Syri, S.; Lehtonen, M. Feasibility study of energy storage options for photovoltaic electricity generation in detached houses in Nordic climates. J. Energy Storage 2022, 54, 105330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinyemi, T.O.; Ramonu, O.J. Mitigation of CO2 Emissions in Transportation and Industrial Processes using Renewable Energy Technologies. Eur. J. Eng. Technol. Res. 2019, 4, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taboada, H.; Xiong, Z.; Jin, T.; Jimenez, J. Exploring a solar photovoltaic-based energy solution for green manufacturing industry. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 20–24 August 2012; pp. 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owolabi, O.F.; Ogundipe, D.S.; Makinde, P. Integration of renewable energy-powered cold storage solutions for reducing post-harvest food waste in rural agricultural areas. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2024, 24, 1829–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, N.A.; Shreyash, K.S.; Adithya, N.V.; Namitha, D.; Kalyan, C.P. Integration and Implementation of Renewable Energy based Charging Station. In Proceedings of the 2023 First International Conference on Cyber Physical Systems, Power Electronics and Electric Vehicles (ICPEEV), Hyderabad, India, 28–30 September 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jairam, Y.; Kumar, U.V.; Rajesh, Y.; Surya, K.S.; Simhadri, M.K. A REVIEW OF Solar Panel Efficiency: The Influence of Installation Angles and Design. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag. 2024, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amick, J.A.; Ghosh, A.K. Practical Limiting Efficiencies for Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1983, 130, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sibinski, M.; Znajdek, K. Innovative Elastic Thin-Film Solar Cell Structures. In Solar Cells—Thin-Film Technologies; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triandini, E.; Jayanatha, S.; Indrawan, A.; Werla Putra, G.; Iswara, B. Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia. Indones. J. Inf. Syst. 2019, 1, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balode, L.; Dolge, K.; Blumberga, D. Sector-Specific Pathways to Sustainability: Unravelling the Most Promising Renewable Energy Options. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arieffadillah, M.F.; Kumara, I.N.S.; Divayana, Y. The Development of Solar PV Car to Reduce Carbon Emissions from Transport Sector. J. Electr. Electron. Inform. 2021, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minak, G.; Lukovic, M.; Maglio, S.; Kojic, S. Toward a sustainable mobility: A solar vehicle for a new quality of life. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 659, 012075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrera, N.A.G.; González, D.C.P.; Mesa, F.; Aristizábal, A.J. Procedure for the practical and economic integration of solar PV energy in the city of Bogotá. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badran, G.; Dhimish, M. A comparative study of bifacial versus monofacial PV systems at the UK’s largest solar plant. Clean Energy 2024, 8, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukir, S.S. (On–Grid) Solar System Designing with a Capacity of 10kw. J. Altern. Renew. Energy Sources 2022, 8, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, A.; Shah, T.; Tewari, N.P. Solar irrigation pumps: Farmers’ experience and state policy in Rajasthan. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 2014, 49, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
Characteristic | Monocrystalline | Polycrystalline | Thin-Film |
---|---|---|---|
Efficiency | 18–22% | 15–17% | 10–12% |
Production Cost | Expensive | Cheaper | Cheapest |
Performance in Low Light | Excellent | Good | Good |
Performance in High Temperatures | Good | Tends to worsen | Excellent |
Space Requirement | Requires smaller space | Requires more space | Requires extensive space |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
David, R.P.; Faisal, I.; Alamsyah, V.B.; Narputro, P. Utilization of Solar Panels in Various Applications: A Systematic Literature Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 107, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107033
David RP, Faisal I, Alamsyah VB, Narputro P. Utilization of Solar Panels in Various Applications: A Systematic Literature Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 107(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107033
Chicago/Turabian StyleDavid, Robby Pahlevi, Irwan Faisal, Viery Bagja Alamsyah, and Panji Narputro. 2025. "Utilization of Solar Panels in Various Applications: A Systematic Literature Review" Engineering Proceedings 107, no. 1: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107033
APA StyleDavid, R. P., Faisal, I., Alamsyah, V. B., & Narputro, P. (2025). Utilization of Solar Panels in Various Applications: A Systematic Literature Review. Engineering Proceedings, 107(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107033