Next Article in Journal
Large Language Model-Assisted Course Search: Parsing Structured Parameters from Natural Language Queries
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Sensitivity Electrochemical Sensor Based on Polyaniline/Sodium Alginate Composite for Pb and Cd Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Nikolay Kakanakov
* and
Sevil Ahmed-Shieva
Faculty of Electronics and Automation, Plovdiv Branch, Technical University of Sofia, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
All papers published in this volume are presented at the 14th International Scientific Conference TechSys 2025—Engineering, Technologies and Systems, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 15–17 May 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 100(1), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025100067
Published: 15 August 2025
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: Single-blind.
  • Conference submission management system: Web based—Open Journal Systems version 3.1.1.4, hosted in Technical University of Sofia, Plovdiv branch.
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 86.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 67.
  • Number of submissions published: 66.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 78%.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.93.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 69.
  • Any additional information on the review process: All papers are reviewed through processes administered by the Academic Editors, with the assignment of two independent reviewers to each paper. If the reviews of a manuscript are too different, a third reviewer is assigned. The selection of reviewers for each paper is performed by the Section Editor to guarantee the assignment of experts in the corresponding field of research. The type of peer review is single-blind, with authors revealed to reviewers to avoid potential conflicts of interest and inappropriate self-citation and self-plagiarism. Reviewers have the opportunity to add their activity to the Reviewer Recognition System (former Publon). Section Editors and the Editorial Board of the conference further review the manuscripts after the conference and before sending them for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kakanakov, N.; Ahmed-Shieva, S. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 100, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025100067

AMA Style

Kakanakov N, Ahmed-Shieva S. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 100(1):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025100067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kakanakov, Nikolay, and Sevil Ahmed-Shieva. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 100, no. 1: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025100067

APA Style

Kakanakov, N., & Ahmed-Shieva, S. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 100(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025100067

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop