Next Article in Journal
Chitosan-Based Bactericidal Interpenetrated Hydrogels
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of the Type and Amount of Plasticizer on the Sensory Properties of Microspheres Sensitive to Lipophilic Ions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Extraction of Germinated Seeds by Conventional and Modern Methods †

National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry, 202 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 17th International Symposium “Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development” PRIOCHEM, Bucharest, Romania, 27–29 October 2021.
Chem. Proc. 2022, 7(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007001
Published: 28 February 2022

Abstract

:
The germination process of whole seeds activates and multiplies the composition of amino acids, antioxidants, vitamins, proteins, enzymes, and sugars, and decreases phytate and protease inhibitors concentrations. Furthermore, germination contributes to the improved digestibility of plant proteins; conversion of carbohydrates to simpler forms for easy assimilation; bioavailability of minerals; freeing up of minerals for absorption; and an increase of beneficial enzymes. The aim of this paper was to perform the extraction of alfalfa germinated seeds using conventional and modern methods for the purpose of physical-chemical characterization. The extraction of germinated seeds was carried out by several methods, namely conventional (hydro-alcoholic and autoclave extraction) and modern (ultrasound-assisted extraction) methods. For each method, the following parameters have been set: solvent/substrate ratio, temperature, and reaction time. Hydro-alcoholic extraction was performed according to the method described by Piantino et al. (2008) with minor modifications [1]. The parameters were as follows: ethanol:water ratio 70:30 v/v, reaction time 24 h, at room temperature, and stirred at 150 rpm. Autoclave extraction was performed according to the method described by Maurizio D’Auria (2021) using parameters temperature (121 °C), pressure (1 bar), and reaction time (15 min) [2]. Ultrasound-assisted extraction carried out according to the method described by Ahmad and Shehta (2020) with modifications [3]. The parameters were as follows: 70% ethanol, substrat:solvent ratio 1:10, reaction time 10, 20, 30 min, at room temperature in an ultrasonic bath. The proximate chemical composition analysis for each extract was performed, which refers to water content, total nitrogen, crude protein, carbohydrates, ash, and both macro and micro elements using standard methods. Following the comparative analysis of the preliminary results obtained for the four extracts, the modern method ultrasound-assisted extraction was selected. The mean percentage of chemical compounds was: moisture (at 105 °C) 78.2 ± 0.48%, crude protein 23 ± 1%, and ash (at 550 °C) 3.09 ± 0.004%. The preliminary chemical analysis of the extracts served as the basis for the selection of the extraction method. Conventional methods require a long time for extraction and use solvents at high costs. The interest in using modern methods for the extraction of germinated seeds is growing due to reduced reaction time and solvent volume involved and the accuracy of results obtained.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.P. and C.R.; methodology, D.P. and C.R.; investigation, D.P.; resources, D.P. and C.M.; writing-original draft preparation, D.P., C.R. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P3-3.5-EUK-2019-0169, within PNCDI III and project number PN 19.23.01.01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study did not require ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Piantino, C.R.; Aquino, F.W.B.; Follegatti-Romero, L.A.; Cabral, F.A. Supercritical CO2 extraction of phenolic compounds from Baccharis dracunculifolia. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2008, 47, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. D’Auria, M.; Mecca, M.; Bruno, M.R.; Todaro, L. Extraction methods and their influence on yield when extracting thermo-vacuum-modified chestnut wood. Forests 2021, 12, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmad, A.; AShehta, H. Assessment of the effects of different extraction methods on the phytochemicals, antimicrobial and anticancer activities of Eruca sativa extracts. Nov. Res. Microbiol. J. 2020, 4, 825–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pasarin, D.; Rovinaru, C.; Matei, C. Extraction of Germinated Seeds by Conventional and Modern Methods. Chem. Proc. 2022, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007001

AMA Style

Pasarin D, Rovinaru C, Matei C. Extraction of Germinated Seeds by Conventional and Modern Methods. Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 7(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pasarin, Diana, Camelia Rovinaru, and Catalin Matei. 2022. "Extraction of Germinated Seeds by Conventional and Modern Methods" Chemistry Proceedings 7, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop