Next Article in Journal
Field Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Monitoring Using Electrochemical Sensors with Partial Least Squares Regression
Previous Article in Journal
Antimony Tin Oxide—Prussian Blue Screen-Printed Electrodes for Electrochemical Sensing of Potassium Ions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Towards Low Temperature VOCs Chemoresistors: Graphene Oxide Versus Porphyrin-Based Materials †

by
Eleonora Pargoletti
1,2,
Francesca Tessore
1,2,
Gabriele Di Carlo
1,2,
Gian Luca Chiarello
1 and
Giuseppe Cappelletti
1,2,*
1
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali (INSTM), Via Giusti 9, 50121 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Chemical Sensors and Analytical Chemistry, 1–15 July 2021; Available online: https://csac2021.sciforum.net/.
Chem. Proc. 2021, 5(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2021-10418
Published: 30 June 2021

Abstract

:
The sensing of gas molecules is of fundamental importance for environmental monitoring, the control of chemical processes, and non-invasive medical diagnostics based on breath analysis in humans. Herein, the synthesis of hybrid materials (SnO2/graphene oxide-GO and SnO2/porphyrins composites) with ad hoc properties led to chemoresistors able to reduce the acetone sensing temperature, guaranteeing acceptable LOD values. As such, boosted potentialities, especially in terms of tuned selectivity and low water interference, may be obtained.

1. Introduction

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are a huge class of molecules emitted from a large variety of both biogenic and anthropogenic sources [1]. They are considered as a critical factor for air pollution, and they give rise to serious problems for both the environment and human health [1,2] due to their easy diffusivity, volatility, and toxicity even at low concentrations [3]. Moreover, some VOCs, present in the human’s breath can be considered as biomarkers of specific illnesses, as they are strictly correlated to several metabolic processes. Among them, acetone can be considered a biomarker for type I diabetes as its concentration in breath varies from 300 to 900 ppb in healthy people to more than 1800 ppb for diabetics [4].
For all these reasons, the monitoring of these compounds has become mandatory. A promising solution for the detection and quantification of VOCs consists in the implementation of chemoresistive gas sensors, based on the electrical resistance variation of the sensing material in the presence of target molecules. The key to facing this challenge is the development of miniaturized chemical sensors, capable of selective sensing a few ppb of VOCs, giving stable and reproducible responses in the presence of high concentrations of interfering species, such as water vapor and other gases [5].
Notably, n-type semiconductor metal oxide (MOS such as SnO2, WO3, ZnO, and TiO2) devices have already been used quite extensively for several applications. They are compact, low-cost, easy to produce and use, and able to detect a wide variety of gaseous species [6,7]. Although these features make such kind of sensors a convenient alternative to the traditional and most sophisticated analytical techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry and gas chromatography), there are also some drawbacks. Specifically, they can only operate at high temperatures (200–400 °C), showing short lifetime and low selectivity, so that it is difficult to selectively analyze multiple species in complex matrices [3].
To overcome these problems, the coupling of metal oxides with other matrices (such as carbonaceous- or porphyrin-based materials) [8,9] seems to be the key factor to create nano-composites capable of sensing at low temperatures (<100 °C), simultaneously achieving good selectivity and sensitivity (ppb level) towards a target compound.
Therefore, the present work is aimed at evaluating and comparing the sensing performances of SnO2 coupled with different porphyrins and graphene oxide (GO) towards acetone molecules, at mild temperatures (150 °C and 75 °C) under UV light, in a fixed SnO2/matrix weight ratio.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hybrid Synthesis, Electrodes Preparation and Sensing Tests

SnO2 nanoparticles were chosen to be grown onto graphene oxide (GO) material by following a very easy hydrothermal method, already reported in our previous works [6,7,8]. According to earlier studies, we adopted 32:1 salt precursor-to-GO weight ratio since it resulted as the optimal one in terms of sensing performances at low operating temperatures [3].
Three different ZnII porphyrins were synthesized according to previous papers [10,11,12], namely ZnTPP, ZnTPP(F20), and ZnTPP(F20CN); their relative chemical structures together with the UV-Vis spectra in CH2Cl2 solution are reported in Figure 1. The UV-Vis patterns are the ones typically observed for porphyrins metal complexes [13], with an intense (ε ≈ 105 M−1 cm−1) Soret or B band at 400–450 nm and two weaker (ε ≈ 103–104 M−1 cm−1) Q bands at 500–600 nm (see the inset in Figure 1).
Then, the SnO2-porphyrin sensors were obtained by depositing onto Pt-based interdigitated electrodes (IDEs), through a hot-spraying method [6,7,8], a first layer of porphyrin (0.6 mg mL−1 in EtOH) followed by a thin film of SnO2 (2.5 mg mL−1 in EtOH). The mass ratio between SnO2 and porphyrin (verified by a microbalance) is 32:1 as in the case of the SnO2/GO composite.
Sensing measurements towards acetone at 150 °C and 75 °C under UV light (Jelosil HG500 lamp; effective irradiation power: 30 mW cm−2) were performed, adopting the chamber, already described elsewhere [14]. The tests have been carried up to 150 °C since the porphyrin complexes degrade at higher temperatures [15]. The sensor response is reported as: (Rair/Racetone) − 1, where Rair is the film resistance in air and Racetone is the film resistance at a given concentration of the acetone gas. We also computed the sensor response (tres) and the recovery times (trec).

2.2. Powders and Porphyrins Characterizations

SnO2 and SnO2/GO samples were characterized by specific surface area measurements (Micromeritics Tristar II 3020, (Norcross, GA, USA), X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD, Philips PW 3710, Texas City, TX, USA) analyses and Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS, Shimadzu UV-2600, Kyoto, Japan) to evaluate powders optical band gaps (Eg) by means of Kubelka-Munk equation [3,8].
The goodness of the as-synthesized powders has been verified through 1H- and 19F-NMR spectroscopy in CDCl3. The NMR spectra are fully in agreement with the recent literature [10,11,12].

3. Results and Discussion

Hybrid sensing materials, such as SnO2-porphyrins and SnO2-graphene oxide composites, arouse interest thanks to the possible complementary features between the two components, showing cooperative and synergistic behavior [6,9].
In the case of SnO2/GO hybrid, the formation of nano-heterojunctions with a three-dimensional SnO2 network has been verified by a combination of physical and chemical characterizations. Specifically, Table 1 reports the specific surface area (SBET), together with total pores volume (Vtot. pores), the average domain size by X-ray diffraction analysis (<dXRPD>) and optical band gap (Eg) of pure SnO2 and GO, together with the composite (SnO2/GO) sample. Moreover, HRTEM, XPS, Raman and responsivity analyses (already reported in our previous works [3,8]) corroborate that a nano-heterojunction occurs when tin oxide particles are grown onto GO sheets, allowing an intimate contact between the semiconductor and the graphene oxide matrix. This fact leads to a signal intensity of three times higher with respect to that of the pure SnO2 (Figure 2a) in the case of 20 ppm of acetone at 150 °C under UV light. Notably, the SnO2/GO was able to reach a LOD of 100 ppb of acetone thanks to the synergistic effect between n-type MOS and p-type GO [3,6]. Furthermore, the response (tres around 60 s) and recovery (trec around 90 s) times seem to be comparable with those of pure SnO2.
Then, the sensors obtained overlapping a SnO2 and porphyrin layers were tested. Specifically, to evaluate the effect of the porphyrin matrix on the sensing properties of SnO2, the responses of SnO2/ZnTPP and SnO2/ZnTPP(F20) were compared to that of pristine SnO2 as shown in Figure 2a. The combination of SnO2 with the ZnTPP porphyrin matrix has undoubtedly a beneficial effect on the sensing performance, as reported in the recent literature [9,15,16]. Li et al. observed that light has a beneficial influence in the gas sensing by ZnO nanorods functionalized with porphyrins [16]. They asserted that light activates a charge transfer from the porphyrin to the ZnO, simultaneously creating a depletion of electrons, which favors the charge transfer from the donor-absorbed species.
Moreover, the main interfering species in the gas sensing process is humidity, especially at low T: Chen et al. [17] observed that the moisture can adsorb on the semiconductor oxide surface, interacting with the acetone molecules and leading to a dramatic change in the final sensor behavior. Indeed, a fluorine modified porphyrin, named as SnO2/ZnTPP(F20), was synthesized and tested, since fluorine atoms may confer hydrophobic character leading to a possible reduction of the water interference. Unfortunately, no positive results were obtained and the signal intensity halved compared to that of the pure SnO2 powders, probably due to the strong electron density attractor capability of F-groups [10,11,12]. Notably, the sensor response of SnO2/ZnTPP(F20CN) at 150 °C (Figure 2a) is the most intense one among the tested hybrid materials, since this ZnII porphyrin carries a cyano-acrylic moiety able to bind SnO2 and to impart a proper directionality to charge-injection [11,12]. Moreover, the CN group acts as a buffer towards the strong electron acceptor behavior of F atoms, guaranteeing concomitantly the desired hydrophobicity to prevent the water interference. All the porphyrin-based sensors reached LOD values of 200 ppb at 150 °C, notwithstanding an increase in the response times of around 25–30% and the recovery times significantly longer (around 200 s).
Finally, further tests were carried out at 75 °C (Figure 2b): while no acetone response (20 ppm) was appreciable in the case of pure SnO2, a reversed behavior in conductance with SnO2/GO sample occurred. This phenomenon is reported to be typical of metal oxide semiconductors, operating at low temperatures due to a greater amount of adsorbed oxygen species and moisture [17]. Instead, under these conditions SnO2/ZnTPP(F20CN) produces a positive response, even if the LOD is 600 ppb, corroborating the synergistic effect between the fluorine species and the anchor group.
We believe that these findings can provide guidelines for the engineering of miniaturized chemoresistive sensors for low-temperature detection of acetone molecule. The excellent performances of the SnO2-GO nano-heterojunctions and especially of SnO2/ZnTPP(F20CN) composite can pave the way for the development of tunable low-cost materials for the fabrication of optoelectronic devices for various applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.P., F.T. and G.C.; methodology, E.P., G.L.C. and G.D.C.; validation, E.P.; formal analysis, E.P.; investigation, E.P.; data curation, E.P. and G.D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D.C.; writing—review and editing, E.P., F.T. and G.D.C.; supervision, G.D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received financial support from the Università degli Studi di Milano through the “PSR2019 Azione A” projects.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, Y.; Wen, M.; Li, G.; An, T. Recent advances in VOC elimination by catalytic oxidation technology onto various nanoparticles catalysts: A critical review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 281, 119447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ren, F.; Gao, L.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Alqrni, A.; Al-Dossary, O.M.; Xu, J. Enhanced BTEX gas-sensing performance of CuO/SnO2 composite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 223, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pargoletti, E.; Hossain, U.H.; Di Bernardo, I.; Chen, H.; Tran-Phu, T.; Chiarello, G.L.; Lipton-Duffin, J.; Pifferi, V.; Tricoli, A.; Cappelletti, G. Engineering of SnO2–Graphene Oxide Nanoheterojunctions for Selective Room-Temperature Chemical Sensing and Optoelectronic Devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 39549–39560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Güntner, A.T.; Abegg, S.; Königstein, K.; Gerber, P.A.; Schmidt-Trucksäss, A.; Pratsinis, S.E. Breath Sensors for Health Monitoring. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tricoli, A.; Nasiri, N.; De, S. Wearable and Miniaturized Sensor Technologies for Personalized and Preventive Medicine. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pargoletti, E.; Hossain, U.H.; Di Bernardo, I.; Chen, H.; Tran-Phu, T.; Lipton-Duffin, J.; Cappelletti, G.; Tricoli, A. Room-temperature photodetectors and VOC sensors based on graphene oxide-ZnO nano-heterojunctions. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 22932–22945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pargoletti, E.; Verga, S.; Chiarello, G.L.; Longhi, M.; Cerrato, G.; Giordana, A.; Cappelletti, G. Exploring SnxTi1−xO2 Solid Solutions Grown onto Graphene Oxide (GO) as Selective Toluene Gas Sensors. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pargoletti, E.; Tricoli, A.; Pifferi, V.; Orsini, S.; Longhi, M.; Guglielmi, V.; Cerrato, G.; Falciola, L.; Derudi, M.; Cappelletti, G. An electrochemical outlook upon the gaseous ethanol sensing by graphene oxide-SnO2 hybrid materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 483, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ekrami, M.; Magna, G.; Emam-djomeh, Z.; Yarmand, M.S.; Paolesse, R.; Di Natale, C. Porphyrin-Functionalized Zinc Oxide Nanostructures for Sensor Applications. Sensors 2018, 18, 2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Di Carlo, G.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Pizzotti, M.; Tessore, F.; Trifiletti, V.; Ruffo, R.; Abbotto, A.; Amat, A.; De Angelis, F.; Mussini, P.R. Tetraryl ZnII porphyrinates substituted at β-pyrrolic positions as sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells: A comparison with meso-substituted push-pull ZnII porphyrinates. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10723–10740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Orbelli Biroli, A.; Tessore, F.; Di Carlo, G.; Pizzotti, M.; Benazzi, E.; Gentile, F.; Berardi, S.; Bignozzi, C.A.; Argazzi, R.; Natali, M.; et al. Fluorinated ZnII porphyrins for dye-sensitized aqueous photoelectrosynthetic cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 32895–32908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Berardi, S.; Caramori, S.; Benazzi, E.; Zabini, N.; Niorettini, A.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Pizzotti, M.; Tessore, F.; Di Carlo, G. Electronic properties of electron-deficient Zn(II) porphyrins for HBr splitting. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Di Carlo, G.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Tessore, F.; Pizzotti, M.; Mussini, P.R.; Amat, A.; De Angelis, F.; Abbotto, A.; Trifiletti, V.; Ruffo, R. Physicochemical investigation of the panchromatic effect on β-substituted ZnII porphyrinates for DSScs: The role of the π bridge between a dithienylethylene unit and the porphyrinic ring. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 7307–7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Americo, S.; Pargoletti, E.; Soave, R.; Cargnoni, F.; Trioni, M.I.; Chiarello, G.L.; Cerrato, G.; Cappelletti, G. Unveiling the acetone sensing mechanism by WO3 chemiresistors through a joint theory-experiment approach. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 371, 137611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anjali, K.; Jayaraj, L.K.N.; Ayyamperumal, C. Zinc-tetraphenylporphyrin grafted on functionalised mesoporous SBA-15: Synthesis and utilisation for nitroaldol condensation. J. Porous Mater. 2020, 27, 1191–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Kang, S.; Mu, J. Preparation and enhanced visible light-driven catalytic activity of ZnO microrods sensitized by porphyrin heteroaggregate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 6705–6709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, H.; Bo, R.; Shrestha, A.; Xin, B.; Nasiri, N.; Zhou, J.; Di Bernardo, I.; Dodd, A.; Saunders, M.; Lipton-Duffin, J.; et al. NiO–ZnO Nanoheterojunction Networks for Room-Temperature Volatile Organic Compounds Sensing. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Investigated ZnII porphyrins and their UV-Vis spectra.
Figure 1. Investigated ZnII porphyrins and their UV-Vis spectra.
Chemproc 05 00060 g001
Figure 2. Sensor response intensities for both pure SnO2 and hybrid materials towards 20 ppm of acetone under UV light at (a) 150 °C and (b) 75 °C.
Figure 2. Sensor response intensities for both pure SnO2 and hybrid materials towards 20 ppm of acetone under UV light at (a) 150 °C and (b) 75 °C.
Chemproc 05 00060 g002
Table 1. Surface area (SBET), total pore volume (Vtot. pores), crystallite domain size by XRD analysis (<dXRD>) and optical band gap (Eg, by Kubelka-Munk extrapolation).
Table 1. Surface area (SBET), total pore volume (Vtot. pores), crystallite domain size by XRD analysis (<dXRD>) and optical band gap (Eg, by Kubelka-Munk extrapolation).
SampleSBET (m2 g−1)Vtot. pores (cm3 g−1)<dXRD> (nm)Eg (eV)
GO300.02011
SnO2670.210153.6
SnO2/GO550.13383.4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pargoletti, E.; Tessore, F.; Carlo, G.D.; Chiarello, G.L.; Cappelletti, G. Towards Low Temperature VOCs Chemoresistors: Graphene Oxide Versus Porphyrin-Based Materials. Chem. Proc. 2021, 5, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2021-10418

AMA Style

Pargoletti E, Tessore F, Carlo GD, Chiarello GL, Cappelletti G. Towards Low Temperature VOCs Chemoresistors: Graphene Oxide Versus Porphyrin-Based Materials. Chemistry Proceedings. 2021; 5(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2021-10418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pargoletti, Eleonora, Francesca Tessore, Gabriele Di Carlo, Gian Luca Chiarello, and Giuseppe Cappelletti. 2021. "Towards Low Temperature VOCs Chemoresistors: Graphene Oxide Versus Porphyrin-Based Materials" Chemistry Proceedings 5, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2021-10418

APA Style

Pargoletti, E., Tessore, F., Carlo, G. D., Chiarello, G. L., & Cappelletti, G. (2021). Towards Low Temperature VOCs Chemoresistors: Graphene Oxide Versus Porphyrin-Based Materials. Chemistry Proceedings, 5(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/CSAC2021-10418

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop