Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Biological Activity Evaluation In Silico of Bis(4-Hydroxy-6H-1,3-Oxazin-6-One) Derivatives and the Products of Their Alcoholysis
Previous Article in Journal
Abstracts of the 1st International Online Conference on Separations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Identification and Synthesis of Semiochemical Substances Analogues of Stink Bugs †

by
Gulnara Shakirzyanova
1,*,
Ulugbek Togaev
1,2,
Omon Kholbekov
1 and
Muxriddin Xudoynazarov
3
1
Low Molecular Biologically Active Substances Laboratory, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, UzAS, M. Ulugbek Str., 83, Tashkent 100125, Uzbekistan
2
Engineering School, Central Asian University in Tashkent, 264 Milliy, bog St, Tashkent 111221, Uzbekistan
3
Chemistry Department, Gulistan State University, 4-Mikrorayon, Gulistan 120100, Uzbekistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 29th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 14–28 November 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ecsoc-29.
Chem. Proc. 2025, 18(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-29-26741
Published: 12 November 2025

Abstract

Stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae) produce a wide range of semiochemical compounds that function as pheromones, allomones, synomones, and kairomones. This study aimed to isolate, identify, and synthesize the main semiochemical components of the metathoracic glands of Aelia rostrata, A. melanota, Eurygaster integriceps, and E. maura. Extracts from male and female glands were analyzed using GC–MS, which revealed that (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate was the dominant compound in all four species. In addition, several α,β-unsaturated aldehydes with chain lengths of C6–C8, including (E)-2-hexenal, (E)-2-heptenal, (E)-2-octenal, and (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, were detected. These compounds are characterized by strong odors and irritant properties, acting as defensive allomones and alarm pheromones. Synthetic routes were developed for these key compounds. In particular, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate was efficiently synthesized via acetylation of (E)-2-hexen-1-ol using acetic anhydride in the presence of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) as a catalyst. This approach significantly reduced the reaction time to 30 min and improved the yield to 90%. Although DMAP is widely used in organic synthesis, the simplicity and efficiency of this optimized protocol for producing semiochemical analogues of stink bugs have not been previously reported. Preliminary trials with synthetic lures indicated their potential for pheromone-based monitoring of stink bug populations in cereal fields. The optimized semiochemical blends developed in this study are expected to contribute to integrated pest management strategies by enabling more effective detection and control of these economically important pests.

1. Introduction

Stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae) are among the most economically important insect groups, feeding on a wide range of host plants and causing serious damage to many crops [1]. Both nymphs and adults attack wheat by feeding on leaves, stems, and grains, resulting in direct yield losses [2].
Beyond physical feeding injury, stink bugs (Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae) secrete salivary enzymes into developing grains, initiating predigestion and enabling the insects to bypass seed defense mechanisms, including digestive enzyme inhibitors and antifeedants [3]. These salivary secretions contain proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes, which degrade gluten proteins and starches within the grain. As a result, flour milled from damaged grains exhibits markedly reduced baking quality [4]. Remarkably, grain damage as low as 2–3% can render an entire flour lot unacceptable for commercial baking [5].
Frequent outbreaks of Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae in cereal crops highlight the urgent need for reliable phytosanitary assessment and the development of preventive monitoring tools. One promising approach is the identification of pheromones in Eurygaster and Aelia populations and the synthesis of highly attractive analogues. Such semiochemical tools would enable early detection of infestations and precise determination of pest distribution within different agroclimatic zones, particularly during vulnerable stages of crop development. Moreover, evaluating the influence of abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic factors on the bioecological parameters of stink bug populations is critical for establishing sustainable pest control strategies.
Stink bugs (Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae) are known to synthesize a broad spectrum of semiochemical compounds that regulate communication and ecological interactions, including pheromones, allomones, synomones, and kairomones. Among these, protective allomones secreted by the metathoracic glands are well studied and play a central role in chemical defense. However, other semiochemically mediated behaviors, such as sexual communication, host-plant selection, and overwintering aggregation, remain insufficiently explored at the chemical and molecular levels [6]. In our study, we identified alarm pheromones with aggregation properties from the metathoracic glands of stink bugs and, based on GC–MS structural analysis, proposed synthetic pathways for analogue compounds that can be evaluated as lures in field trials.

2. Methods and Materials

GC–MS analyses were performed on an Agilent 5000 GC with split and splitless injectors, coupled to an Agilent 5977B GC/MSD in SIM, SCAN, and EI (70 eV) modes. An HP-5 ms Ultra Inert column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) was used, with hydrogen as the carrier gas (1.2 mL/min, constant flow). Injection volume was 0.25 μL in splitless mode at 280 °C. The oven temperature program was: 50 °C (1 min), 20 °C/min to 180 °C, then 0.5 °C/min to 195 °C, hold for 20 min. Transfer line, ion source, and quadrupole temperatures were set at 320 °C, 230 °C, and 150 °C, respectively. Mass spectra were acquired over the range 25–600 amu with a solvent delay of 3.5 min. Solvents and reagents were purified by standard distillation or recrystallization. TLC was carried out on Silufol silica gel plates with ethyl acetate/hexane (1:5) as the eluent, visualized with iodine vapor. Flash chromatography was performed on Merck 60 F254 silica gel using hexane/ethyl ether mixtures.
Collection of Biological Material under Field Conditions. Study of Specific Features of Maintaining Biological Material under Laboratory Conditions.
Specimens of Eurygaster integriceps, E. maura, Aelia rostrata, and A. melanota were collected from experimental wheat and barley fields. Initial field surveys involved visual inspection for insect presence, yellowing of leaves, stem necrosis, and spike wilting. Population density was estimated using systematic sampling with a 50 × 50 cm frame and entomological nets. Adults were then collected manually from foliage into glass containers. All developmental stages were present in the field, but only adult specimens were used for further study. In the laboratory, adults were maintained in rearing containers under controlled temperature and continuous ventilation. Plant material was replaced with fresh material every 2–3 days, and humidity was sustained by adding moistened filter paper to the containers (Figure 1).
Dissection of the metathoracic glands from the biological material of Eurygaster integriceps, Eurygaster maura, Aelia rostrata, and Aelia melanota.
To prevent premature release of glandular contents, approximately 50 adult stink bugs were individually frozen prior to dissection. The insects were then fixed dorsally in Petri dishes and dissected under a stereomicroscope. Dissection involved a longitudinal incision along the dorsal abdominal margin extending to the metathoracic region and beneath the scutellum. The dorsal cuticle was gently lifted, and internal organs were removed with fine surgical scissors to expose the metathoracic glands (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Following dissection, the metathoracic gland complex situated in the ventral abdominal region was carefully removed with fine forceps and placed into solvent-filled vials (hexane, methylene chloride, or dichloroethane) for subsequent chemical extraction.
Identification of the composition of metathoracic glands from the biological material, determination of structural features, and detection of dominant and minor components of the attractant substances of insect metathoracic glands.
Secretions from the metathoracic glands of male and female Eurygaster integriceps, E. maura, Aelia rostrata, and A. melanota were analyzed by GC–MS, and the results are presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Preliminary GC–MS results indicated that the metathoracic gland extracts of all examined species contained identical major constituents, specifically (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate and n-undecane. Both compounds are characterized by strong odors and irritant properties, making them effective chemical defenses that function as readily detectable warning signals. Furthermore, the hydrocarbon fraction plays an important role in modulating semiochemical release, acting as both a solvent and a substrate for the controlled emission of more volatile compounds.
Different synthetic pathways for the obtaining pheromone components and key synthons.
Synthesis of (E)-2-hexenal. (E)-2-hexen-1-ol (5.0 g, 0.05 mol) dissolved in 25 mL of methylene chloride was added dropwise to a suspension of pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC, 13.0 g, 0.06 mol) in 100 mL of methylene chloride. The reaction mixture gradually turned black, consistent with aldehyde formation, and was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. After the addition of 50 mL of hexane, stirring was continued for 30 min. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (SiO2, L100/160) with methylene chloride/hexane (2:1) as the eluent, yielding 3.0 g (65%) of (E)-2-hexenal.
Synthesis of (E)-2-hexen-1-yl acetate (Method 1). A solution of (E)-2-hexen-1-ol (0.05 mol) and acetic anhydride (0.05 mol) in benzene (100 mL) was prepared in a round-bottom flask equipped with mechanical stirring and a reflux condenser fitted with a CaCl2 drying tube. One drop of concentrated sulfuric acid was added as a catalyst, and the reaction mixture was refluxed with continuous stirring for 6 h. After completion, the mixture was poured onto ice, and the organic phase was separated. The organic layer was washed with aqueous sodium carbonate solution (3 × 50 mL) followed by water (3 × 50 mL), then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by vacuum distillation (bp 85–87 °C at 1 mmHg), affording 4.5 g (65%) of (E)-2-hexen-1-yl acetate.
Synthesis of (E)-2-hexen-1-yl acetate (Method 2). A mixture of (E)-2-hexen-1-ol (5.0 g, 0.05 mol) and acetic anhydride (10.2 mL, 0.1 mol) was stirred at room temperature in the presence of pyridine (15.0 mL) for 15 h. The reaction was quenched by pouring onto ice-cold water (~100 mL), and the mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 25 mL). The organic phase was separated, washed with water (50 mL) and then with saturated NaCl solution (50 mL), and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Following solvent removal, the crude product was purified by vacuum distillation to afford (E)-2-hexen-1-yl acetate (bp 85–87 °C/1.0 mmHg, yield 5.5 g, 70%).
Synthesis of (E)-2-hexen-1-yl acetate (DMAP-catalyzed). (E)-2-hexen-1-ol (0.95 mmol) was reacted with acetic anhydride (0.95 mmol) in the presence of DMAP (0.095 mmol) as a catalyst in methylene chloride, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was diluted with methylene chloride (10 mL) and quenched with 30% aqueous acetic acid until the pH reached 5–6. The organic layer was separated, washed with saturated NaCl solution, and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After solvent removal under reduced pressure, the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (SiO2, L100/160) using hexane/ether (1:1) as the eluent (Rf = 0.8). The reaction afforded the acetate in 90% crude yield with >95% purity confirmed by GC.

3. Results and Discussion

The use of pheromones in hemipteran pest management has considerable potential, but their application must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking into account both biological characteristics and economic feasibility. Comparable research on termites demonstrated that bait-based systems can be optimized as a cost-effective control strategy. Hemipteran responses to pheromones vary markedly among species. For instance, mirids of the genus Phytocoris respond strongly to synthetic pheromone analogues, and pheromone traps are widely employed for monitoring their population dynamics and associated crop damage. In contrast, phytophagous stink bugs in the families Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae are only weakly attracted to pheromone sources when other communication cues are absent [7]. These insects often approach pheromone sources but fail to enter traps, as short-range orientation relies primarily on vibrational signals rather than volatile chemicals. Consequently, mating in Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae involves a two-step process: long-range attraction mediated by pheromones and short-range localization facilitated by substrate-borne vibratory signals generated by both sexes [8].
Many species of stink bugs are polyphagous, exhibit high mobility, and readily disperse between cultivated crops and adjacent vegetation. Owing to their wide host range and capacity for rapid movement, they are considered one of the four most economically significant insect pest groups globally [9]. A key adaptive feature of these insects is the presence of well-developed scent glands [10,11], which secrete a variety of defensive compounds that deter predators. These secretions typically contain short-chain alcohols, aldehydes, esters, (E)-2-alkenals, 4-oxo-(E)-2-alkenals, alkanes, monoterpenes, and aromatic alcohols and aldehydes. The chemistry of stink bug pheromones is even more diverse, encompassing simple esters, monoterpenes, linear, monocyclic, and multicyclic sesquiterpenoids, as well as structurally novel acetogenins.
For many Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae species, pheromone-based mating disruption strategies are limited in effectiveness because the insects do not remain consistently on a given crop; after mating, females readily migrate to other host plants. Identified pheromone components range from relatively simple straight-chain esters and aldehydes to structurally more complex molecules. However, the biological role of these semiochemicals is still poorly characterized. In certain species, sex pheromones are unambiguous, with one sex releasing the signal and the other responding to facilitate mating. In contrast, in species where adults of both sexes, and even immature nymphs, respond to the same compounds, the functional basis of this attraction remains unresolved. Clarifying these communication mechanisms is critical for assessing the feasibility and reliability of pheromone-based tools in pest management programs targeting Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae.
Monitoring stink bug populations in cereal crops through conventional entomophytosanitary methods is time-consuming and laborious, often requiring repetitive field sweeping, laboratory sorting, and detailed species-level identification—tasks made even more challenging under conditions of high pest density. This has created a need for alternative, more objective approaches to hemipteran monitoring. According to published studies, the main semiochemical attractants of stink bugs are 2-alkenals (particularly E-isomers), saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, and 4-oxo-(E)-2-alkenals [12]. Pheromone structures have been elucidated for nearly 45 species of Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae [13], with research efforts concentrated primarily on pests of soybean, coffee, and fruit and vegetable crops. The chemical ecology of stink bugs in this region remains largely uncharacterized. By contrast, pheromonal communication in stink bugs infesting cereal crops in Uzbekistan has not previously been examined. Our study addresses this gap, and we expect that results from field trials will contribute to the development of pheromone-based monitoring tools for integration into cereal crop pest management programs.
Development of Synthetic Methods for Analogues of Attractive Compounds of Stink Bugs.
Stink bugs are often described as miniature chemical factories due to their well-developed scent glands, which occur in the abdomen of immature stages and in the metathoracic region of adults [14]. In many phytophagous Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae, pheromones differ both chemically and functionally from defensive secretions and are synthesized in tissues separate from those producing defensive compounds. Nonetheless, the distinction between pheromonal and defensive secretions has sometimes been blurred. A number of compounds have been designated as pheromones despite minimal or inconclusive bioassay data confirming their function as intraspecific signals involved in mating, aggregation, or other behaviors.
Previous studies have demonstrated that α,β-unsaturated aldehydes can act simultaneously as aggregation pheromones, alarm signals, and defensive secretions in insects [15,16]. Experimental evidence indicates that exposure to C6–C8 α,β-unsaturated aldehydes produces moderate but reversible paralysis in crickets. This phenomenon has been attributed to (E)-2-alkenals, whose relatively small molecular size and structural features facilitate rapid cuticular penetration. Conversely, aldehydes with longer carbon chains exhibit reduced penetration efficiency. Similar effects were observed for (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, which also induced temporary locomotor paralysis. These findings suggest that short-chain α,β-unsaturated compounds may interfere with locomotion-related physiological processes, potentially by disrupting neurotransmission through competitive antagonism or weak blockade of neuronal target sites.
Analysis of metathoracic gland secretions from Eurygaster integriceps, E. maura, Aelia rostrata, and A. melanota identified (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate as the dominant compound. To support further applications, we optimized its synthesis and proposed alternative synthetic routes using improved reagents and catalytic techniques. Literature indicates that α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, including (E)-2-hexenal, play multiple ecological roles as aggregation pheromones, alarm signals, and defensive compounds [17]. Their biological activity is partly due to electrophilic reactivity, enabling covalent interactions with cysteine residues in proteins, enzyme active sites, glutathione, and other thiol-containing molecules such as coenzyme A, which can disrupt physiological processes and act as a toxic defense mechanism [18,19,20]. In our study, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate, together with n-undecane and n-tridecane, represented approximately 90% of the secretion profile and were consistently detected in both Aelia and Eurygaster. These long-chain hydrocarbons likely act as solvents or carriers, regulating the release of more volatile semiochemicals. Building on these structural insights, we developed an original method for synthesizing analogues of the identified compounds, which will be evaluated in field trials for their attractiveness to stink bugs. Unsaturated E-fragment compounds were synthesized via the Wittig–Horner reaction under phase-transfer catalytic conditions, providing efficient access to the desired products in high yield. Comparable approaches have been applied in the synthesis of weevil aggregation pheromone analogues [21].
(E)-2-hexen-1-ol and (E)-5-decen-1-ol were synthesized under the described conditions, affording 55% yield Scheme 1. The obtained (E)-2-hexen-1-ol was subsequently oxidized with pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC), producing (E)-2-hexenal in 75% yield, as outlined in Scheme 2.
In addition, the unsaturated alcohol was acetylated under standard reaction conditions to give the corresponding acetate in 65% yield, as presented in Scheme 3.
The resulting unsaturated alcohol was also converted into the corresponding acetate in the presence of dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) as a catalyst [14], using acetic anhydride.
Catalytic conditions significantly improved the synthetic process, reducing the reaction time to 30 min and increasing the yield to 90% Scheme 4. This approach thus demonstrated clear advantages for obtaining the desired product efficiently.
Comprehensive GC–MS analysis of metathoracic gland extracts enabled the identification and structural characterization of both dominant and minor secretion components. The major compounds detected were (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate and n-undecane, which together constituted approximately 90% of the total extract content and were found in both sexes. These compounds were consistently associated with Aelia rostrata, A. melanota, Eurygaster integriceps, and E. maura, species that are widespread in cereal-growing regions of Uzbekistan and Central Asia.
On the basis of structural analysis, we designed synthetic methods for the preparation of pheromone precursors (synthons) and successfully synthesized the major semiochemical components intended for application in pheromone-based monitoring systems.
Alongside the dominant compounds, additional substances were identified in both male and female specimens, including (E)-2-hexenal, (E)-5-decen-1-ol, n-tridecane, hexadecane, and tridecyl butyrate. These aldehydes and esters are characterized by strong odors and irritant properties, enabling them to function as warning signals and defensive secretions. The long-chain hydrocarbons are likely involved in modulating semiochemical release, serving as substrates for the gradual emission of more volatile compounds. Taken together, these findings indicate that the metathoracic gland secretions include alarm pheromones with aggregation effects.

4. Conclusions

The present research investigated the chemical ecology of stink bugs (Pentatomidae and Scutelleridae) of the genera Eurygaster and Aelia, which are important pests of cereal crops in Uzbekistan. Biological material was collected under field conditions, and procedures for maintaining live specimens in the laboratory were established. Metathoracic gland extracts were prepared using organic solvents and analyzed by GC–MS. Structural analyses revealed that (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate and n-undecane were the predominant components in both males and females, together accounting for approximately 90% of the secretion profile. These compounds were consistently identified in Aelia rostrata, A. melanota, Eurygaster integriceps, and E. maura.
In addition to the dominant compounds, several minor components were detected, including (E)-2-hexenal, (E)-5-decen-1-ol, n-tridecane, hexadecane, and tridecyl butyrate. Aldehydes and esters were characterized by strong odors and irritant properties, suggesting their role as defensive signals, whereas hydrocarbons likely function as substrates for regulating the release of volatile compounds. On this basis, alarm pheromones with aggregation effects were identified. Synthetic approaches for the preparation of semiochemical compounds were developed, and the synthesis of key pheromone precursors was optimized. Field testing of synthetic analogues is currently underway in cereal crop fields. These efforts are expected to provide effective tools for the development of pheromone-based [22] monitoring systems and to contribute to integrated pest management strategies for grain protection in Uzbekistan and Central Asia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.S. and O.K.; methodology: U.T.; synthesis: G.S. and O.K.; GC-MS—analysis: U.T., M.X. and G.S.; writing: G.S. supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by: Agency for Innovative Development under the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Innovation of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The housing of the biomaterial in the laboratory conditions and the experimental protocol complied with “Rules for working with experimental animals” developed and approved by the Ministry of Health of the USSR (1977) and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2000). Biotesting was conducted according to authorization by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments based on a protocol approved by the Committee on Animal Ethics of the Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, AS RUz (Protocol No. 138/2b of 18 January 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arnett, R.H., Jr. American insects. In A Handbook of the Insects of America North of Mexico; Crane Press: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1993; 850p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hosseininaveh, V.; Bandani, A.; Hosseininaveh, F. Digestive proteolytic activity in the Sunn Pest, Eurygaster integriceps. J. Insect Sci. 2009, 9, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mehrabadi, M.; Bandani, A.R.; Allahyari, M.; Serrao, J.E. The Sunn Pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) digestive tract: Histology, ultrastructure and its physiological significance. Micron 2012, 43, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Allahyari, M.; Bandani, A.R.; Habibi-Rezaei, M. Subcellular fractionation of midgut cells of the Sunn Pest Eurygaster integriceps (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae): Enzyme marker of microvillar and perimicrovillar membrane. J. Insect Physiol. 2010, 56, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Parker, B.L.; Amir-Maafi, M.; Skinner, M.; Kim, J.; EL-Bouhssini, M. Distribution of Sunn Pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae), in overwintering sites. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2011, 14, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Millar, J.G. Pheromones of True Bugs. In The Chemistry of Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals II; Topics in Current Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; Volume 240, pp. 37–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McBrien, H.L.; Millar, J.G. Phytophagous bugs. In Pheromones of Non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants; Hardie, J., Minks, A.K., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 1999; 277p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cokl, A.; Virant-Doberlet, M. Communication with Substrate-Borne Signals in Small Plant-Dwelling Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2003, 48, 29–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Aldrich, J.R.; Hrimian, A.K.; Zhang, A.; Share, P.W. Bug pheromones (Hemiptera, Heteroptera) and tachinid fly host-finding. Landesmuseen Neue Ser. 2006, 50, 1015–1031. [Google Scholar]
  10. Weiler, L.; Barão, K.R.; Cassis, G.; Grazia, J. Morphology of the External Scent Efferent System of Neotropical Shield Bugs (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae: Pachycorinae). Zoomorphology 2017, 136, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rohanová, M.; Schaefer, C.W.; Křížková, P.; Vilímová, J. Scent Efferent System of Dorsal bdominal Scent Glands in Nymphs of Rhopalidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomomorpha) and Its Comparison with Other Pentatomomorpha. Zool. Anz. 2016, 260, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Capinera, J. Invasive Stink Bugs and Related Species (Pentatomoidea). Biology, Higher Systematics, Semiochemistry, and Management; McPherson, J.E., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; Volume 101, 350p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ögür, E.; Tuncer, C. Chemical Analysis of the Metathoracic Scent Gland of Eurygaster maura (L.) (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2019, 21, 1473–1484. [Google Scholar]
  14. Staddon, B.W. The scent gland of Heteroptera. Adv. Insect Physiol. 1979, 14, 351–418. [Google Scholar]
  15. Noge, K.; Becerra, J.X. 4-Oxo-(E)-2-hexenal produced by Heteroptera induces permanent locomotive impairment in crickets that correlates with free thiol depletion. FEBS Open Bio 2015, 5, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shakirzyanova, G.S.; Romanova LCh Babaev, B.N.; Abdukacharov, V.S.; Iskandarov, T.I.; Gaibova, S. Synthesis of synthetic analogue Sitophilus weevils aggregation pheromone and studying of hygienic and toxicological indexes. Acta Agric. Slov. 2021, 117, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheikh, M.C.; Takagi, S.; Yoshimura, T.; Morita, H. Mechanistic studies of DCC/HOBt-mediated reaction of 3-phenylpropionic acid with benzyl alcohol and studies on the reactivities of ‘active ester’ and the related derivatives with nucleophiles. Tetrahedron 2010, 6, 7272–7278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Togaev, U.; Rakhmonkulova, A.; Sharma, M.; Agarwal, S.; Turaev, A.S.; Tillyabaev, Z.; Matchanov, A.; Khodja-Akhmedova, K.; Ruzmetov, R.; Abdullaev, I.; et al. Whole metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiome of higher termites (Microcerotermes turkmenicus Luppova, 1976) in Uzbekistan. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 41, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Togaev, U.; Turaev, A.S.; Mathur, V.; Tilyabaev, Z.; Zhaloliddinov, F.; Turageldiyev, S.; Shakirzyanova, G.; Khashimova, M.; Rustamov, K.; Matchanov, A. Innovative Strategies for Termite Management: Development and Evaluation of Effective Baits against Anacanthotermes turkestanicus. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2024, 21, 1429–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thakur, H.; Agarwal, S.; Buček, A.; Hradecký, J.; Sehadová, H.; Mathur, V.; Togaev, U.; van de Kamp, T.; Hamann, E.; Liu, R.-H.; et al. Defensive glands in Stylotermitidae (Blattodea, Isoptera). Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2024, 79, 101346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shakirzyanova, G.; Nabiev, A.; Kholbekov, O.; Abdukakharov, V. Pheromone Monitoring in the Granaries of Uzbekistan. Agric. Sci. 2023, 14, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Omon, K.; Gulnara, S.; Azimjon, M.; Bahrom, B.; Turgun, J.; Jahongir, T. The Study of Allelochemicals of the Melon Fly (Myiopardalis pardalina Bigot.). Agric. Sci. 2023, 14, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Eurygaster integriceps specimens prepared for dissection.
Figure 1. Eurygaster integriceps specimens prepared for dissection.
Chemproc 18 00057 g001
Figure 2. Preparation of biological material for dissection.
Figure 2. Preparation of biological material for dissection.
Chemproc 18 00057 g002
Figure 3. Dissection process.
Figure 3. Dissection process.
Chemproc 18 00057 g003
Figure 4. GC–MS ion fragmentation profile of metathoracic gland extracts from Eurygaster integriceps and Eurygaster maura. The chromatogram (top) and representative mass spectrum (bottom) indicates major component: a peak at retention time (t) = 4.07 min with a diagnostic fragment ion at m/z 143, corresponding to (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate (MW = 142.23); TIC chromatogram. The chromatographic trace is plotted in a single color; the different colors in the legend on the right indicate individual integrated peaks and do not represent separate colored lines in the chromatogram.
Figure 4. GC–MS ion fragmentation profile of metathoracic gland extracts from Eurygaster integriceps and Eurygaster maura. The chromatogram (top) and representative mass spectrum (bottom) indicates major component: a peak at retention time (t) = 4.07 min with a diagnostic fragment ion at m/z 143, corresponding to (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate (MW = 142.23); TIC chromatogram. The chromatographic trace is plotted in a single color; the different colors in the legend on the right indicate individual integrated peaks and do not represent separate colored lines in the chromatogram.
Chemproc 18 00057 g004
Figure 5. GC–MS ion fragmentation profile of metathoracic gland extracts from Aelia rostrata and A. melanota. A peak at t = 4.67 min with a fragment ion at m/z 156, corresponding to n-undecane (MW = 156.31).
Figure 5. GC–MS ion fragmentation profile of metathoracic gland extracts from Aelia rostrata and A. melanota. A peak at t = 4.67 min with a fragment ion at m/z 156, corresponding to n-undecane (MW = 156.31).
Chemproc 18 00057 g005
Scheme 1. This scheme shows a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons (HWE) olefination of an aldehyde with diethyl phosphonoacetate, followed by LiAlH4 reduction to give the allylic alcohol.
Scheme 1. This scheme shows a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons (HWE) olefination of an aldehyde with diethyl phosphonoacetate, followed by LiAlH4 reduction to give the allylic alcohol.
Chemproc 18 00057 sch001
Scheme 2. This is PCC oxidation of a primary allylic alcohol to the corresponding aldehyde.
Scheme 2. This is PCC oxidation of a primary allylic alcohol to the corresponding aldehyde.
Chemproc 18 00057 sch002
Scheme 3. Acetylation of the allylic alcohol to the corresponding allyl acetate using Ac2O/pyridine or Ac2O/Et3N (C6H6) as alternative conditions.
Scheme 3. Acetylation of the allylic alcohol to the corresponding allyl acetate using Ac2O/pyridine or Ac2O/Et3N (C6H6) as alternative conditions.
Chemproc 18 00057 sch003
Scheme 4. Acetylation of the allylic alcohol with acetic anhydride/DMAP in CH2Cl2 to give the corresponding allyl acetate.
Scheme 4. Acetylation of the allylic alcohol with acetic anhydride/DMAP in CH2Cl2 to give the corresponding allyl acetate.
Chemproc 18 00057 sch004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shakirzyanova, G.; Togaev, U.; Kholbekov, O.; Xudoynazarov, M. Identification and Synthesis of Semiochemical Substances Analogues of Stink Bugs. Chem. Proc. 2025, 18, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-29-26741

AMA Style

Shakirzyanova G, Togaev U, Kholbekov O, Xudoynazarov M. Identification and Synthesis of Semiochemical Substances Analogues of Stink Bugs. Chemistry Proceedings. 2025; 18(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-29-26741

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shakirzyanova, Gulnara, Ulugbek Togaev, Omon Kholbekov, and Muxriddin Xudoynazarov. 2025. "Identification and Synthesis of Semiochemical Substances Analogues of Stink Bugs" Chemistry Proceedings 18, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-29-26741

APA Style

Shakirzyanova, G., Togaev, U., Kholbekov, O., & Xudoynazarov, M. (2025). Identification and Synthesis of Semiochemical Substances Analogues of Stink Bugs. Chemistry Proceedings, 18(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-29-26741

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop